163:
and Welsh law". This is not, nor has it ever been, a recognised term of art. And, with the greatest respect, the fact that one of the cases happens to have a Welsh town as one of the parties is hardly a relevant criterion for mentioning Welsh law. The legal system is administered from
Westminster and the law applied is English. My apologies, I wish that what you are proposing would make legal sense so that Wales could be mentioned, but since what we are trying to do in Wiki is to provide a good verifiable academic standard, I cannot agree to any requests to amend the term of art.
74:
53:
84:
22:
757:. Clearly the adjective meaning pleasant is the primary usage of "nice" in the English language, but we don't have an article on that topic in Knowledge since this is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. Of all usages that are relevant to Knowledge, clearly the city in France has primary usage, which is why that article is at
723:
Well, we have no where to send the reader who is looking for the emotion since we don't have an article on that topic. So, of those we can help, surely far more than 80% are looking for the legal term, and a hat note to the film and other uses should more than adequate for handling the remainder. I
484:
That the disambiguation page was moved without discussion and nobody noticed to object doesn't mean the term is a primary topic. On the face of it some discussion to validate the primary topic status is warranted. Or, in the absence of any discussion or evidence, I'd suggest that the proposal should
162:
and "English law" is the recognised term of art used more or less consistently throughout the entire academic literature on law. As I recall, Hallsbury may desribe the listing on the title page as the "Law of
England and Wales" but no-one that I have ever met before has ever used the phrase "English
909:
And all I'm saying is that the term is ambiguous. It matters little whether the film is an example of the use of the legal term (or of the common dictionary definition). If a person is looking for the film (or any of the other things named Malice), placing the legal term as the primary topic is not
1029:
I was not seriously suggesting that the film should be the primary topic. Only that there is still no convincing evidence that the legal term is the primary topic. If you examine the first several pages of Google results for Malice, few of them are explicitly about the legal term. Even your Google
681:
than other meanings". The "ill-will" dictionary meaning you speak of is not even covered as a topic at
Knowledge, which means it's not read at all. Among the uses that are searched for and read, clearly the legal meaning is significantly more commonly searched for than other meanings, as made
1007:
the year the film was made, 1993, we still get about 4M hits. But if we search for articles about the film, references that include both Alec
Baldwin as well as the year, we get only 14,800. It seems pretty clear to me, at least according to google searches, that the legal use is much more
779:. Quite apart from the dictionary definition, there are several terms on the disambiguation page and no convincing evidence that the legal term is significantly more likely to be what readers might expect. If anything, I'd suggest that the 1993 film is more widely known than the legal term.
871:
I'm just saying that the movie title is an example of use of the word as the legal term. Anyway, at least according to google results (see below), the film is not that widely known (I, for one, had never heard of it). Also, I started looking at
Knowledge links to
980:
Note that if you add the 41k hits on Alec
Baldwin to the 1.20M hits with the year of the movie (which would include the 15k that references both) you still get a much smaller number than the 8.3M hits produced when excluding 1993 as well as Alec Baldwin.
1030:
results indicate that of the approximately 9 million hits for the term, only approximately half that number are returned when limited to Malice +law. The term is ambiguous and having the disambiguation page at the base term is appropriate.
910:
going to help. Having the disambiguation page at the base term is the correct placement. The fact that people create links that should go to wiktionary is merely an additional indication that the legal term is not the primary topic.
700:
analysed the logic here: unless it is 80% likely that we are giving the reader the right article, we should not drag him through the wrong article, especially since some readers will miss or misunderstand hatnotes.
616:
and every reference to the term in a book title (as near as I can tell) refers to the legal usage, I can't find hardly any other usages in the google results, certainly nothing nearly as notable. Can you? The
940:
Alec
Baldwin is the main star in the film, so restricting the search for Malice to include his name might be a reasonable way to get a feel for the popularity of the film relative to other uses.
814:
Derivative use is not relevant. That logic would also support keeping
Plymouth, England at Plymouth, since all the other uses directly or indirectly derive from the original placename.
339:
Granted, there are films and games named "Malice", but none of them are major hits. I think the legal term is the primary meaning that someone would expect to find in an encyclopedia.
401:
186:
This i belive will clear up understanding in terms of duristiction (sp) without afecting the 'term of art' i hope that this would be an acceptible alteration to the article.--
594:. No evidence that the legal usage is most common, much less primary usage in our sense. Where there is no primary usage, the plain name should be the disambiguation page.
1135:
1167:
1163:
1149:
856:
Yes, and it has been the subject of considerable discussion. Many, including myself and Serge, do not support having the
English city at the plain name.
1234:
258:
Malice is hateful or very bad. For example if someone is malice its like if someone purposely is clapping at a play when not to soppose to.
232:
Malice is a worddefining mean and hateful. For exmple when you are at a play and someone starts to clap when not suppose to that is malice.
126:
1097:
1077:
265:
239:
218:
136:
211:
Does this basically mean, if someone says they are going to hit me and threating me with violence. Does that mean they are
Malicing me?
492:
434:
362:
340:
326:
1136:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060313092450/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd000518/rivers-1.htm
544:
is not notable enough (in an encyclopedia sense) to even have an entry here. Of the uses that are notable, clearly the legal sense is
843:
1239:
1229:
1145:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
937:
I'm trying some different google searches to try and ascertain the relative popularity of searches for the legal term and the film.
1139:
1061:
I'm not a lawyer but the first paragraph says there is express malice only when there is deliberate killing of a person.
1210:
405:
33:
1050:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
293:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
306:
1064:
I'm pretty sure there are all kind so express malice. I think all I've got to do is punch you out for no reason.
97:
58:
1166:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1081:
775:
It seems the !votes should be in the Survey section, not the Discussion section, no? But following along here,
269:
243:
1101:
999:
So if we search for Malice references that include references to the law, but exclude all hits that reference
222:
21:
466:. As the legal term has been identified as the primary article, the qualifier "(legal term)" is unnecessary.
1201:
1127:
847:
496:
438:
366:
344:
330:
101:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1123:
1009:
674:
618:
549:
322:
302:
1185:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1173:
39:
1126:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
382:
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
1073:
1017:
900:
801:
766:
729:
706:
687:
652:
630:
599:
582:
557:
523:
488:
261:
235:
214:
876:
and I'm finding many of them are clearly references to the legal term, and have started fixing them
625:. What kind of evidence do you need to realize that the legal usage clearly meets this criteria? --
196:
I have absolutely no problem with your proposed amendment. Thank you for being so understanding. =)
463:
450:
358:
314:
697:
1170:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1186:
1035:
915:
861:
832:
819:
784:
1096:
Can malice lead to contamination? Can contamination also lead to malice what my mom told me?
1140:
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd000518/rivers-1.htm
471:
1193:
1013:
896:
797:
762:
725:
702:
683:
648:
626:
595:
578:
553:
519:
187:
1152:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
891:
for the noun, which should go to the wiktionary entry (if they are to be links at all)
1192:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1223:
613:
1119:
1031:
911:
857:
815:
780:
612:
No evidence that the legal usage is the primary usage? When you consider that the
430:
197:
164:
73:
52:
1159:
467:
176:
159:
83:
172:
thanks for taking the time to explain this to me, so what about the following.
1158:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1067:
Am I wrong? Murder is one example of express malice, but not the only one.
180:
89:
79:
1085:
839:
994:
Results 1 - 10 of about 3,960,000 for Malice +law -"Alec Baldwin" -1993.
696:
Whence? From observing practice, which is the basis of all guidelines.
955:
Including the year of the film, 1993, might be illustrative as well:
888:
884:
873:
515:
459:
454:
354:
318:
179:
civil law (being the law of England and Wales), relevant case law in
1215:
1105:
1038:
1021:
918:
904:
864:
851:
822:
805:
787:
770:
733:
710:
691:
656:
634:
603:
586:
561:
527:
500:
475:
442:
370:
348:
334:
310:
273:
247:
226:
200:
190:
167:
1012:
criteria of "significantly more commonly searched for and read". --
970:
Results 1 - 10 of about 8,310,000 for Malice -1993 -"Alec Baldwin"
1046:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
361:. No-one has been bothered by this until now, nine months later.
761:. The situation is very similar for the legal term, malice. --
758:
754:
647:, "ill-will", may be primary usage; if that is not, nothing is.
975:
Results 1 - 10 of about 14,800 for Malice +1993 +"Alec Baldwin"
643:
usage of the term, which it is not. The root sense of malice,
102:
15:
1070:
Badly written, someone should fix it but I am not a lawyer.
950:
Results 1 - 10 of about 8,890,000 for Malice -"Alec Baldwin"
510:, it is the emotion. But there may not be one; either way I
353:
Another point: in February, someone changed the redirect at
753:
For precedence that contradicts PMAnderson's argument, see
485:
be to move the disambiguation page back to the base term.
1130:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
540:
Knowledge is not a dictionary. The emotion definition of
945:
Results 1 - 10 of about 41,700 for Malice +"Alec Baldwin"
883:. Of course a quicker fix would be to move this page to
892:
880:
877:
287:
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal.
984:
Now let's try to limit the search to the legal term:
514:
this move, and recommend the move of the dab page to
1162:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
796:
That film is an example of the legal term usage! --
404:, please explain your reasons, taking into account
989:Results 1 - 10 of about 4,150,000 for Malice +law.
965:Results 1 - 10 of about 8,350,000 for Malice -1993
960:Results 1 - 10 of about 1,020,000 for Malice +1993
506:It should not be; if there is a primary sense of
429:The following was a contested move proposal at
1148:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
682:evident by a google search for "malice". --
673:usage" criteria"? The criteria cited at
19:
1118:I have just modified one external link on
402:polling is not a substitute for discussion
158:In the law, England and Wales is a single
47:
300:leave the plain name as the disambig page
887:... There are also examples of links to
1008:prevalent than the film, and meets the
49:
669:Where do you get this "80% to 90% of
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
105:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
639:Evidence that it is 80% to 90% of
14:
1122:. Please take a moment to review
1092:Can malice lead to contamination?
1057:First sentence is wrong isn't it?
677:is "significantly more commonly
82:
72:
51:
20:
298:The result of the proposal was
131:This article has been rated as
406:Knowledge's naming conventions
1:
1106:07:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
1039:16:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
1022:15:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
919:16:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
905:15:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
865:14:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
852:13:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
823:13:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
806:03:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
788:03:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
771:04:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
734:00:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
724:mean, let's be reasonable. --
711:19:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
692:16:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
657:02:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
635:01:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
623:much more used than any other
604:22:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
587:21:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
562:21:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
546:much more used than any other
528:19:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
501:14:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
443:14:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
394:, then sign your comment with
371:14:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
349:14:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
335:14:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
311:10:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
1235:High-importance law articles
476:23:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
227:16:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1216:08:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
1086:18:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
321:— Seems to be primary use,
274:16:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
248:16:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
201:07:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
191:03:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
183:and misfeasance...........
168:01:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
1256:
1179:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1115:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
137:project's importance scale
130:
111:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
67:
46:
1240:WikiProject Law articles
1230:Start-Class law articles
1048:Please do not modify it.
424:Any additional comments:
290:Please do not modify it.
114:Template:WikiProject Law
1111:External links modified
462:currently redirects to
28:This article is rated
679:searched for and read
1160:regular verification
592:Very strongly Oppose
1150:After February 2018
1056:
464:Malice (legal term)
451:Malice (legal term)
359:Malice (legal term)
315:Malice (legal term)
1204:InternetArchiveBot
1155:InternetArchiveBot
698:User:Robert A West
34:content assessment
1180:
1076:comment added by
833:Plymouth, England
709:
655:
602:
526:
491:comment added by
303:Anthony Appleyard
276:
264:comment added by
250:
238:comment added by
229:
217:comment added by
154:England and Wales
151:
150:
147:
146:
143:
142:
1247:
1214:
1205:
1178:
1177:
1156:
1088:
705:
651:
598:
522:
503:
398:
392:
386:
292:
259:
233:
212:
119:
118:
115:
112:
109:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1220:
1219:
1208:
1203:
1171:
1164:have permission
1154:
1128:this simple FaQ
1113:
1094:
1071:
1059:
1054:
1010:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
935:
703:Septentrionalis
675:WP:PRIMARYUSAGE
649:Septentrionalis
596:Septentrionalis
520:Septentrionalis
486:
420:
396:
390:
384:
378:
323:WP:PRIMARYUSAGE
288:
282:
256:
209:
156:
133:High-importance
116:
113:
110:
107:
106:
98:WikiProject Law
88:
81:
62:High‑importance
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1253:
1251:
1243:
1242:
1237:
1232:
1222:
1221:
1198:
1197:
1190:
1143:
1142:
1134:Added archive
1112:
1109:
1098:112.209.65.184
1093:
1090:
1078:107.198.86.118
1058:
1055:
1053:
1052:
1043:
1042:
1041:
997:
996:
995:
991:
990:
978:
977:
976:
972:
971:
967:
966:
962:
961:
953:
952:
951:
947:
946:
934:
933:Google results
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
869:
868:
867:
826:
825:
809:
808:
791:
790:
773:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
716:
715:
714:
713:
662:
661:
660:
659:
607:
606:
589:
577:. Per nom. --
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
548:, and thus is
533:
532:
531:
530:
479:
478:
427:
426:
419:
416:
415:
414:
411:
410:
385:*'''Support'''
377:
374:
313:
296:
295:
283:
281:
280:Requested move
278:
266:207.70.191.118
255:
252:
240:207.70.191.118
219:217.206.25.201
208:
205:
204:
203:
155:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
141:
140:
129:
123:
122:
120:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1252:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1225:
1218:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1175:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1116:
1110:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1091:
1089:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1068:
1065:
1062:
1051:
1049:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1003:Alec Baldwin
1002:
993:
992:
988:
987:
986:
985:
982:
974:
973:
969:
968:
964:
963:
959:
958:
957:
956:
949:
948:
944:
943:
942:
941:
938:
932:
920:
917:
913:
908:
907:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
879:
875:
870:
866:
863:
859:
855:
854:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
834:
830:
829:
828:
827:
824:
821:
817:
813:
812:
811:
810:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:
793:
792:
789:
786:
782:
778:
774:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
749:
748:
735:
731:
727:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
712:
708:
704:
699:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
680:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
619:primary usage
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
588:
584:
580:
576:
573:
572:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
502:
498:
494:
493:128.232.1.193
490:
483:
482:
481:
480:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
452:
448:
447:
446:
444:
440:
436:
435:128.232.1.193
432:
425:
422:
421:
417:
413:
412:
409:
407:
403:
395:
391:*'''Oppose'''
389:
383:
380:
379:
375:
373:
372:
368:
364:
363:128.232.1.193
360:
356:
351:
350:
346:
342:
341:128.232.1.193
337:
336:
332:
328:
327:128.232.1.193
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
294:
291:
285:
284:
279:
277:
275:
271:
267:
263:
253:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
230:
228:
224:
220:
216:
206:
202:
199:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
184:
182:
178:
173:
170:
169:
166:
161:
153:
138:
134:
128:
125:
124:
121:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1202:
1199:
1174:source check
1153:
1147:
1144:
1120:Malice (law)
1117:
1114:
1095:
1072:— Preceding
1069:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1047:
1045:
1004:
1000:
998:
983:
979:
954:
939:
936:
844:87.115.80.23
835:
776:
750:
678:
670:
644:
640:
622:
621:standard is
591:
574:
545:
541:
511:
507:
449:
433:: (moved by
428:
423:
399:
393:
387:
381:
357:to point to
352:
338:
299:
297:
289:
286:
257:
231:
210:
185:
174:
171:
157:
132:
117:law articles
96:
40:WikiProjects
487:—Preceding
260:—Preceding
234:—Preceding
213:—Preceding
103:legal field
30:Start-class
1224:Categories
1211:Report bug
1014:Born2cycle
897:Born2cycle
798:Born2cycle
763:Born2cycle
726:Born2cycle
707:PMAnderson
684:Born2cycle
653:PMAnderson
627:Born2cycle
600:PMAnderson
579:Born2cycle
554:Born2cycle
524:PMAnderson
418:Discussion
188:Happyhaydn
181:negligence
90:Law portal
1194:this tool
1187:this tool
614:1993 film
1200:Cheers.—
1074:unsigned
840:Plymouth
489:unsigned
400:. Since
262:unsigned
236:unsigned
215:unsigned
1124:my edit
751:Comment
645:malitia
575:Support
550:primary
198:David91
177:English
165:David91
135:on the
1001:either
889:Malice
885:Malice
874:Malice
777:Oppose
542:malice
516:Malice
512:oppose
508:malice
468:Neelix
460:Malice
455:Malice
376:Survey
355:Malice
319:Malice
254:Malice
207:Malice
36:scale.
1036:wiser
1032:older
916:wiser
912:older
895:. --
862:wiser
858:older
820:wiser
816:older
785:wiser
781:older
431:WP:RM
160:state
1102:talk
1082:talk
1018:talk
901:talk
848:talk
831:uh?
802:talk
767:talk
759:Nice
755:Nice
730:talk
688:talk
631:talk
583:talk
558:talk
552:. --
497:talk
472:talk
439:talk
397:~~~~
367:talk
345:talk
331:talk
325:. —
307:talk
270:talk
244:talk
223:talk
127:High
1168:RfC
1138:to
838:at
671:all
641:all
175:In
108:Law
59:Law
1226::
1181:.
1176:}}
1172:{{
1104:)
1084:)
1034:â‰
1020:)
1005:or
914:â‰
903:)
860:â‰
850:)
842:.
836:is
818:â‰
804:)
783:â‰
769:)
732:)
690:)
633:)
585:)
560:)
518:.
499:)
474:)
458:—
453:→
445:)
441:)
388:or
369:)
347:)
333:)
317:→
309:)
272:)
246:)
225:)
1213:)
1209:(
1196:.
1189:.
1100:(
1080:(
1016:(
899:(
893:3
881:2
878:1
846:(
800:(
765:(
728:(
686:(
629:(
581:(
556:(
495:(
470:(
437:(
408:.
365:(
343:(
329:(
305:(
268:(
242:(
221:(
139:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
