60:
186:
I'm rather concerned that the IP doing the review here has no other edits except for starting this. As someone who has followed this article from afar, I'd be willing to do the review if the starting of the review is some sort of mistake. If not, I'll just observe. Just a note, this article has had
144:
140:
125:
65:
117:
98:
88:
70:
276:
IPs can't do reviews so I am failing this nomination. Looking at the article it is not of GA standards, if the niomintor wants feedback, try reading
133:
174:
110:
93:
44:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
302:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
17:
168:
254:
206:
23:
164:
289:
230:
240:
192:
285:
226:
277:
293:
263:
234:
215:
178:
281:
225:
them, but not review. So, feel free to go ahead with the review.
239:
On second thought, I'm probably too involved to do the review.
221:
Just as a note, Sven, IPs can't review articles. They can
188:
152:
121:
8:
24:Talk:Manav Rachna College of Engineering/GA1
48:
79:
51:
7:
40:The following discussion is closed.
31:
298:The discussion above is closed.
1:
18:Talk:Manav Rachna University
294:00:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
264:00:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
235:22:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
216:00:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
179:20:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
317:
187:some strange history, see
300:Please do not modify it.
42:Please do not modify it.
43:
261:
213:
107:
106:
41:
22:(Redirected from
308:
260:
255:
252:
212:
207:
204:
157:
148:
129:
61:Copyvio detector
49:
27:
316:
315:
311:
310:
309:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
274:
256:
249:
245:
241:
208:
201:
197:
193:
184:Outside comment
165:122.176.150.135
138:
115:
109:
103:
75:
46:
36:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
314:
312:
297:
280:and perhaps a
273:
272:Technical fail
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
247:
243:
199:
195:
158:
105:
104:
102:
101:
96:
91:
85:
82:
81:
77:
76:
74:
73:
71:External links
68:
63:
57:
54:
53:
47:
38:
37:
35:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
313:
301:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
271:
265:
262:
259:
253:
251:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
219:
218:
217:
214:
211:
205:
203:
190:
185:
181:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
163:
159:
156:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
136:
132:
127:
123:
119:
114:
113:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
56:
55:
50:
45:
33:
25:
19:
299:
275:
257:
242:
222:
209:
194:
183:
182:
171:
161:
160:
153:
149:
135:Article talk
134:
130:
111:
108:
99:Instructions
39:
286:Jezhotwells
282:peer review
227:Dana boomer
122:visual edit
66:Authorship
52:GA toolbox
162:Reviewer:
89:Templates
80:Reviewing
34:GA Review
278:WP:WIAGA
223:nominate
175:contribs
94:Criteria
250:anguard
202:anguard
145:history
126:history
112:Article
154:Watch
16:<
290:talk
258:Wha?
246:ven
231:talk
210:Wha?
198:ven
189:this
169:talk
141:edit
118:edit
292:)
284:.
233:)
191:.
177:)
143:|
124:|
120:|
288:(
248:M
244:S
229:(
200:M
196:S
172:·
167:(
150:·
147:)
139:(
131:·
128:)
116:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.