Talk:Marvel Cinematic Universe/Archive 10

935:, but you need a source that supports it, and discuss it in more detail in the body of the article. A cleaner dividing line, which I think is likely the one taken by a plurality of reliable sources, would be between "film" and "television", according to which Coulson's (and Carter's, Sitwell's and Stark's) appearances in the Blu-Ray shorts would not count as separate media to the feature films, and we could happily lump the streaming shows in with the network television; but that would only increase the number of characters who have at least "appeared" in "all" (two) media exponentially. And if this definition also includes "comic books" and "video games" as separate "media of the MCU", that would be giving more undue weight to non-canonical promotional materials that the creative forces behind neither the films nor the TV shows take as being part of "the universe". 367:

do you know what that means? It certainly doesn't mean that the Daredevil and Doctor Strange comics are in separate universes. It simply means that both comics take place in the larger Marvel Comics Universe, but they don't cross-over. The same thing accounts for the shows and movies of the MCU. They all take place in the same larger Cinematic Universe, but they do not directly cross-over. Otherwise you're saying, "Well, the movies are impacting the shows, so that clearly proves the movies aren't in the same universe as the shows." The movies are doing their own thing, and the shows are doing their own thing, and they are not mandated to force-feed us cross-overs. I'm curious, though: do you also feel that the Marvel/Netflix shows are part of a separate universe, apart from both the movies and

436:

episodes of Daredevil that their total duration surpassed that of AOS, but not the total episode number. It's these sorts of questions that keep me up at night. Anyway, I don't think it's unreasonable to classify a season as a single release. It seems to be a good equalizer: regardless of how many minutes of content we're getting within a season, divided among how many episodes, we're still getting a season of content. It would probably still, at this point, count Clark Gregg as having appeared more than any other character, but at least it would be a number possible to beat in the future, not a ridiculous 90+ appearances. Honestly, the only guy who should appear that much is Stan Lee. -

2002:

In the past, this has been the accepted layout, though said editor pointed out that the reasoning in the past was that images of every director couldn't fit and got goppy-looking. However, this can all be solved by making the directors' images smaller - as I have done similarly on the DCEU page. As this makes the page consistently look the same, and due to the fact that an average reader would have no clue that the editors have decided to only include selected directors - making the page inconsistent - I suggest we add in each of the directors' images by their FIRST respectively entry in the MCU. Adds to the aesthetic and layout of the page.--

848:

steer clear of the drahma boards for a while, so it wouldn't be me acting out on these so-called "threats" anyway. Stop edit-warring while refusing to engage in discussion, stop referring to the status-quo as "consensus", stop removing maintenance tags, and stop referring to the addition of maintenance tags as a change to the text of the article that requires "consensus". No one thinks a maintenance tag is a potential improvement to the article that we should get consensus to implement: that claim was ridiculous when CurtisNaito made it two years ago, and it's still ridiculous now that you are making it.

3174:

Silver Surfer, Galactus, Fantastic Four, etc. In the event that the deal goes through (and it is believed that the announcement could come as early as next week), how should we address it in this article? Even if the report doesn't shed any light on the direction that Disney plans on taking these properties, it probably does at least deserve a mention on this page. At the very least it probably deserves an initial mention in the Cultural Impact section under 20th Century Fox. In any case, such a merger will have enormous impacts on both the MCU and the current X-Men series at Fox.

2142: 564:

of these is acceptable by itself, and I have seen people get TBANned for less than you have now done. WP:CALC is about whether a simple calculation has to be sourced in the body of an article; it has nothing whatsoever to do with inclusion of material in the lead that is not included elsewhere in the article, and this isn't even a simple calculation (you are counting individual episodes as separate appearances, but at least one other user thinks a season is one appearance, and I'm actually more inclined to take one TV show as one appearance).

960:"All the different media of the MCU" is all that are defined in the opening two sentences of the lead paragraph (and subsequent subsections): feature films, comic books, short films (One-Shots), television series (regardless of release platform) and digital series. Nothing about this is arbitrary as you are claiming (seemingly with your personal opinion of what is and isn't considered canon material of the MCU). As for sources to support it, the table in the section does so, as we have Coulson spanning all four columns, with sources. - 302:

also has to be backed up directly in the body of the article. (I think case could be made for either of those as well, or even for Robert Downey Jr.'s Tony Stark, since honestly he was the first to cross over into another film franchise and the number of MCU films not to feature him, name-drop him, or shoe-horn one of his relatives in for marquee value and to tie specifically back to him could still be counted on one hand, while Coulson was a character in

31: 1583:) - Aside from both Kevin Feige and James Gunn confirming that Stan Lee has played the same character in every Marvel Cinematic Universe property, the Netflix shows give him the name Captain Irving Forbush of the NYPD. Irving Forbush is the alter-ego of the Marvel superhero Forbush Man. I'm in support of him being added to the recurring characters, since we actually have a name for him and it happens to be someone from the comics. 4786: 4223: 3657: 2086: 1312: 759:

be of Gregg and Coulson. So how about this: "Phil Coulson, portrayed by Clark Gregg, is an original character to the MCU, that has appeared across all the different media of the MCU." This keeps our desire to have the mention be Coulson, and is factually correct in that he is the only character/actor to appear in the films, TV series, One-Shots, digital media, and the tie-in comics. -

1869:

question is 'why do we need those colored boxes?' and further more 'what determines the color!?'. Whatever the argument is for them, I think they should be removed. None of the films listed have them. If your argument is to keep them, then 'why don't we put colored boxes next to each of the films, too?'...yeah completely superfluous to have it on the page.--

3277:- totally agree with the 'studios influenced' section. Where two of the larger sections have now been integrated into the MCU - perhaps a short description of how the studio attempted similar 'shared universes', but then ultimately rebooted (Sony) and joined, or were bought out (Fox) and will be integrated. The section definitely needs to be shortened. 4835: 3720: 2945:"Thor: Ragnarok, Black Panther, Ant-Man and the Wasp, Avengers: Infinity War, and the Untitled Avengers film have until one month after its physical home media release to be nominated for a Good Article. (Discussions on this retention period limit here and here.) They then need to be nominated to the Good Topic per the instructions here." 585:

can we really compare a network series to a Netflix series, which generally have fewer episodes? Another option would be to say, "X has appeared in most number of MCU titles" and count each title equal regardless of episode or season count. It would also mean that One-Shots and digital series are also counted the same as films.--

4678:. Namely, that we haven't been doing a great job of including alt descriptions with images. We just need to go through the pages and make sure that anything not really conveyed by the captions on images is being described in an alt so that people who can't see the images get an equivalent experience to everyone else. - 541:) to get to this: be it an episode counts as 1 appearance, a whole season is one appearance, or a group of episodes to get to "feature film length" (so like 3-4, 40 min episodes). That is why it is included as such in the lead, which doesn't necessarily mean it is pulled verbatim from somewhere in the article. - 4411:". But we see that he has updated his armor significantly, similar to that of the 'Bleeding Edge' armor from the comics, that is nanotechnology based and stored in the new arc reactor he has in his chest. Perhaps these film pages and any other related articles should be updated to reflect that? (here's a 4928:

Well, we should be able to just remove the fair use rationale from the image. It is literally just text, there is no fair use required. I just wanted to have a little discussion before I did it; I am going to be bold and do it now, anyone can revert me and we can continue the discussion if necessary.

4083:

I actually think it should go in the "Cultural impact" section as its own subsection. Because what it seems to me you are trying to add Cambalachero, is the influence the MCU had on the 616 Universe, not necessarily MCU versions or MCU inspired characters appearing in the comics. If it was the later,

3239:

Now that two of our main examples of studios being influenced by the MCU have been partly integrated or discussed to be integrated with the MCU, I wondered whether others wanted to discuss potentially restructuring that aspect of this article, having a smaller influenced by section that just mentions

3110:

Marvel Cinematic Universe characters such as Iron Man, Captain America, etc. have made significant appearances in several films with box office receipts amounting to billions. These incredibly popular characters are simply delegated to small sections composed of mere paragraphs or even just sentences

2446:

I didn't actually get to c/e yet (so standby on that), but I'm not sure a table would be appropriate, because we've generally reserved the tables for "in canon" MCU material. So if we want to continue that, then maybe splitting to a separate list is also appropriate. But then again, all of are splits

926:

is by using an arbitrary definition of "media" that includes "Blu-Ray special features" and "network television" as separate media from "feature films", but lumps Netflix in with network television, and even under such a definition it's not clear how Howard Stark, Peggy Carter, Jasper Sitwell are not

758:

The onus of the sentence, as I've stated, is to be the lead mention for the recurring characters section of the article. Also as I've mentioned, the previous consensus was the current wording. Obviously there has been disagreement on this specific wording, but seems to be agreement the mention should

605:

cross-over because his first television appearance post-dates his in-universe death, which the films for which the MCU is named have been sticking to, but that's beside the point.) Just stating that he has made X number of appearances doesn't make sense, as it would beg the questions "So? Is that the

495:

is equivalent to ten or twenty movies is essentially ignoring the films -- is out of the question) and unverifiable. But it seems virtually everyone here is still missing the point that this information should not be in the lead unless it mentioned somewhere in the body of the article. I'm re-tagging

366:

is meaningless? That doesn't make any sense to me. The MCU is not obligated to have every character cross-over to every other property, just like every Marvel comic is not obligated to have every character cross-over all the time. If the Daredevil comics never cross-over to the Doctor Strange comics,

3208:

There is a paragraph at "Business practices". It may be expanded when new info is available (if it is either confirmed or rejected). Yes, if it happens it will be a turning point with several consequences and may deserve its own section, but let's wait and see. Have in mind that we can't really talk

2616:

The reason I kept the prose as such was because, unlike the films/TV series etc., these video games do not have a separate list article where this info would be included. As such, these bits as they pertained to the universe, seemed the most relevant to keep on this article (at least the Lego stuff,

2385:

Finished going all of the different versions of the games and they seem to be very loosely based on either the film universe or the film itself. I've gone a head and added the short summaries of each game. As a note (to whomever read this), please don't be quick to revert if you do not like the list

705:

is only allowed with consensus. RM has a good point: Stan Lee has been in 15 films and 2 TV series for a total of 17 appearances while Clark Gregg has been in 4 films, 2 one-shots, 1 TV series, and 1 digital series for a total of 8 appearances. However, I am still in favor of removing it entirely as

563:

Stop removing maintenance templates without addressing the issues. I pinged you the first time you reverted me, and you ignored all subsequent discussion until I readded the template, and you reverted again regardless. In other words, you (1) edit-warred to (2) remove a maintenance template. Neither

536:

The inclusion in the lead is to make mention of the recurring character section, as sections in the article should be noted in the lead. As such, Coulson got the mention because not only is he original to the MCU (as noted), he has appeared the most (also as noted). This is no matter how you look at

297:

Anyway, regardless of whether the films take place in the same universe as the TV shows (I don't think they do, but I'm fine waiting for that to become "official" before adding it to the article), the fact is that the lead currently contains a somewhat controversial claim, not supported by a sourcs,

112:

This section was originally opened without a title because I'm a dunce. Dinoslider applied the title "Most appearances". This apparently led to the discussion veering somewhat off-topic, with a number of editors (including, ironically, the one who had initially removed the "not in body" tag) stating

4106:

But the Cultural Impact is for influences outside of Marvel. We already have information about how the MCU’s success has influenced their own films (increasing the number of films per year, etc.) and growth into other media in the development section. Also it’s nice to keep related topics together.

3857:

For anybody interested and who has the time, I think we are getting to the point where the MCU-inspired attractions could probably get their own article, or we could at least put together a proposed new article where that stuff is split-off from here. A decent MCU-inspired video games article could

3804:

I am wondering why it was decided to exclude 'story by' credits within the chart. Other similar pages list the 'story writer' credit right after the screenwriter credit, unless there is no provided/credited story writer; then there is just the screenwriters inserted across the columns. What was the

2916:

would not be answered, because that subpage is not a discussion portal (as I explained), simply a means to display and keep track of the info. No one was going to answer it there, and it is very unlikely many others would even see it. Hence starting this discussion so you can ask you question and a

2755:

made for the Netflix series, and it also has an "episode" like the WHIH Newsfront series of viral videos. It hasn't been updated for The Defenders or The Punisher so far, but we may get more in the future. Shouldn't it be mentioned in the Digital Series section, or make a "Viral Videos" sub-section

2727:

that I think is worth considering. Because the Lego game is not technically a "tie-in" game, this option I have created removes the Lego game from the table, and restores it to its own subsection as it has essentially been on this article before these other VG additions. In my eyes, this helps with

2697:

Because there is so much of it. That plus the table puts the section way over the top in terms of weight. And like I said we don't go into detail about the content of the films, television series, one shots, or comic books here, so it's weird that we do that for the video games which as you pointed

2001:

This has been a topic touched on recently, and here's what I have to say about it. There were some constructive edits done by an editor that was quickly reverted on the argument that a consensus was already reached here. The directors' images on this page currently only include recurring directors.

1954:

It's a formatting that has been accepted by the TV project for displaying such info, and has been implemented here. Is it honestly a big deal if we have *gasp* two seasons with a similar color? No it isn't, so I don't see this as an issue or a problem going forward. It also isn't a "coding mess" as

793:

using random claims of "prior consensus" to justify edit-warring and removal of maintenance templates. If you cannot back up your "consensus" claims by pointing a discussion on this talk page where there was clear consensus for the content you are insisting is just fine exactly as it is and doesn't

625:

I should have clarified "X" and "Y" don't represent the number of appearances but the actor as in "Downey Jr. (for example) has appeared in the most number of films, while Greg has made the most number of television appearances." That way we aren't trying to compare apples to oranges. But I do like

435:

as an appearance as opposed to each episode. The TV series of the MCU don't have a set number of episodes per season (22, 13, 10, etc.) nor a set duration of each episode (Daredevil has reached as high as 65 minutes I think, while AOS has hit 41 or so). What would happen if we eventually had enough

392:

And this is ultimately why I rarely to anything here at Knowledge. There's too much red tape and bureaucratic ****. Do we need a source to say that Coulson has made such-and-such amount of appearances? Is it really considered Original Research to do kindergarten-level simple math and add all of his

289:

Thing is, though, Coulson's death is about the one area where we can be certain the creative powers behind the films are ignoring the TV series and pretending they exist in a different universe. We know as a near-certainty that he will never appear in another movie, since the guy who killed him off

274:

My reasoning was simple enough: Each episode counts as a separate entry in the MCU, just like each movie in a trilogy counts as a separate entry. So Coulson would have the most appearances overall in the MCU, even if he hasn't appeared the most in the movies or crossed-over the most. Beyond that, I

4121:

I don't know what the right place to put this is, but a section on the impact the MCU has had on the comics is more than just MCU-inspired characters appearing in other media, it should be about the general ways the comics have imitated the MCU, as well as why and if it has been successful if that

4038:

Marvel comics as well. The inhumans were pushed to leading roles in the detriment of the X-Men and even starred in crossover events, many characters are slightly or heavily modified to match their cinematic versions, the GOTG include their humor, "The Defenders" and "Avengers Assemble" had similar

3223:

After further research, it appears that Fox does not own, nor has ever held, the rights to Fantastic Four. The rights have been held by Constantin Films since at least the early-to-mid 80s, and every film in the franchise, including the 3 films released by Fox, were produced through them. It would

3173:

It is being reported that Disney is currently in the process of purchasing 20th Century Fox for an estimated $ 60 billion. As I'm sure most of you are aware, if this happens then that implication is that Marvel Studios will regain the rights to many A-list characters including the X-Men, Deadpool,

2775:

The article has no explanation of what it means by the term "phase", but the term is used throughout, starting in the lede, as if it had some sort of significance. (The term "Phase Two" is actually capitalized in the lede, which seems puzzling.) I actually came to the article because I'd heard the

1939:

Other TV shows may be able to sustain that formatting, but given how many various MCU television series there are, and seasons within those shows - I agree with other editors in saying it's going to become a coding mess. With how close two differing shades can look, it's going to get even hairier.

1216:

It is a logo for the MCU, released officially by Disney as part of a televised documentary about the MCU. And it is by far the best option. Your alternative not only is not a logo for the MCU (and so potentially confusing), it also applies only to two films at the moment, and this article is about

721:

Yeah, I agree for the reasons against mentioning it in the lead, at least without a source. I didn't think about Stan Lee, but again as important in real-life as he may be, putting him up against the characters of the MCU makes him seem kind of trivial in comparison. He's just the "Hey, fans, it's

584:

Is there another way to work around this? I does seem a bit like apples and oranges to me. A film appearance doesn't really equal a television episode. Could we say, "X has made the most appearances in MCU films, while Y has made most number of appearances in MCU television series"? But then again

301:

I fully agree that an argument could be made that Phil Coulson, as an MCU original character who appeared in most of the Phase I movies and One-Shots, and headlined the first MCU television series, is more worthy of mention in the lead of this article than Atwell's Carter of Jackson's Fury, but it

252:

agree on this, then one feigning agreement with me by blanking a sentence I had tagged, and the other then re-adding the sentence without the tag, is really sneaky. Removing maintenance tags without addressing the issues is a very serious issue (don't make me explain how), and using workarounds to

218:

That discussion is a mess, but there are only five people involved. Even if four of the five all agreed from start to finish (and a compromise that's no one's ideal is not the same as everyone being in full agreement) 4-1 would not be much of a "consensus"; and then there's the fact that they four

4368:

Agree with Adam. Also IP, the line is most certainly correct. Per the wording, Coulson is the only character to appear in ALL MCU media (no longer is the line stating "most appearances"). No other character has appeared in a feature film, One-Shot, TV series, or digital series. Coulson has in all

3944:

I was curious how or why it was decided to exclude Thor's last name in any of the cast listings. Everytime he introduces himself it's as "Thor Odinson". The argument could be made that he's introducing himself as Odin's son, but in the Norse mythology and Marvel's adaptation thereof this is how a

1652:

It may not change your opinion, but to clarify - the article didn't actually say that Feige was being "tongue-in-cheek". It said that even with Feige's statement about him being the same character, the author thought it was being done tongue-in-cheek. It's the author's opinion of it, not Feige's.

1188:, the current image is not the "Marvel Cinematic Universe" logo as it says it is. The image in use is a marketing image for a collection. It's a poor-colored image, with lousy placement. Something that better represents the MCU needs to be used. Never has this image appeared in any of the films.-- 847:

of disputed material, as it hadn't been changed -- it had been tagged, and you removed the tag without addressing the issues. And I'm not "threatening" you; I'm just warning you about what happens to editors who pull the kind of stuff you are pulling here. As you may be already aware, I intend to

737:

Yeah, and there's also the fact that the MCU is mostly notable for innovations in cross-franchise continuity (which is why Coulson gets mentioned and why I think a case could be made for Stark too), while Stan Lee had been making cameos in movies based on Marvel comics long before that (i.e., his

240:

agreed with Favre (although the latter appeared to be doing so in more of a generic sense that supported some hypothetical wording about how Gregg has appeared the most across the various MCU media, not the current wording about how Gregg has the highest numerical count of appearances if we count

4148:

This article gives a brief history or summary of "Other Studios" attempting to establish their own movie universe as opposed to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. After Disney/Marvel's acquisition of all the X-Men & Fantastic Four character rights from Fox, why is there no mention of this in the

1868:

So, when there were only several TV shows as a part of the shared universe, the whole colored boxes were pretty cool because they matched the themes/colors of their respective series. As the shows have exponentially increased, the colors become more and more obscure and completely irrelevant. My

674:

As I told Bold Clone above, I fully agree with your sentiment and think that Coulson probably does deserve mention in the lead. But that completely misses the point that this should not be in the lead if it's not in the body, and should not be in the body just because you and I (and however many

168:

On top of that, this type of claim must not be included in the lead unless also verified in the article body, regardless of whether it is accurate or not. Even though no one directly removed the maintenance template (if I was as conspiracy-minded as some users I've interacted with recently, I'd

1343:

I believe there was an error in naming Sony's universe. Technically, what they have is not a "Marvel Universe" as they only have rights to Spider-Man and Spider-man related characters. Therefore I suggest that any mention of "Sony's Marvel Universe" be renamed to "Sony's Spider-Man Universe".

647:

TV appearances of any main character will probably go beyond a main film character. But it's who's most relevant. Coulson has appeared more than any other character in several different media, such as films, one-shots, TV series, and web shorts. Beyond that, it's debatable. Or even mentioning

3834:

There may be an archived discussion mentioning this, but essentially, if giving the overview of each film, the screenwriter is the one that puts out what you see on the screen, even if the structure/premise of it was created by someone else. That's why "story by" credits have been omitted. -

144:

This talk page has nine archives, so alluding to some unspecified prior consensus when reverting a valid edit without linking it is disruptive. I'm inclined to think this info is just outdated (i.e., it originates in a time when Coulson had appeared in more films than any of the other actors

600:

I don't think that would solve it. This is a massive article with a relatively tiny lead section. The only way we can justify mentioning Coulson in the lead is by saying that he has made "the most appearances" (something that as of May 2017 is still true even by my conservative estimate) or

203:

wasn't really productive, so the status quo remained. My opinion is that since there was an argument on how to calculate it, then the answer is not clearly stated in the body and thus should not be stated in the lead. Even if it was, it seems like a pretty trivial fact in my opinion. -

2667:

How is keeping the prose as proposed any different than the prose featured for the other subsections of "Outside media" we have? It seems to be less than "Live attractions" and "Television specials" for sure. I don't feel by having it is giving any undue weight to these video games. -

3488:

I've linked the actual photo in the EL section of the film cast list, but as to where we mention the 10 year celebration, I'm still at a lose myself. I feel like it should probably be this article, but I don't think we should start a whole new section just for this info. -

113:

their agreement that Coulson should be stated as having the most appearances while ignoring my main point that such claims should not be in the lead if they are not also made in the article body. I have renamed the section accordingly, to avoid any more misunderstandings.

2868:

period or stage. What distinguishes Phase One (all-caps) from Phase Two? I could refer to the first three chapters of the book I'm currently reading as "phase one", but that would be silly unless there's some distinct change between those chapters and the ones that

1261:

Amy Pascal recently said at a press conference that Venom would be set in the same universe as the rest of the MCU and that Tom Holland could potentialy appear in the Venom movie. Meaning that the Venom movie should be added on to this page Here is the source:

938:

TLDR: The above suggestion by Triiiplethreat is based on an arbitrary definition of what count as "different media", and said arbitrary definition needs a source to be included in the article. I have no problem with the definition personally, but it has to be

2732:'s weight issue, because we can then look at this as two things: the "tie-ins" as the table, with the quick mentions of actor reprisals below, and then the Lego game as its own thing, with only the prose. Let me know how everyone feels about this option. - 2844:

Also, while it's not a term that's used in this context outside of MCU films, it's also kind of self-explanatory. A phase according to a quick google search is "a distinct period or stage in a process of change or forming part of something's development".

1805:

However, "thus"ly so each and every TV series that has been up for debate of whether it is a part of the MCU or not - HAS IN FACT been a part of the MCU. "Thus" the information in question will "thus" be added to the page, "thus". You can quote me on that

2859:

I did see the quotes you mentioned, Favre1fan93, but you're asking me to infer a lot from that. Especially with the unusual and extremely formal (all-caps) way the term is used. Prof Kilroy: the formal, all-caps usage of the term suggests a significance

1128:

I was just wondering why in the world the image at the top of the page is being used as the shared universes official logo? Marvel Studios has had an official logo as a separate entity separating itself from other Marvel productions since the release of

798:. Otherwise, making this claim as a justification for your edit-warring is even worse than the edit-warring and removal of templates in and of itself. Again, people have been TBANned for less than what you have now done multiple times. Stop it. Now. 3193:

page. For clarification, Fox is selling their production studio and some other assets, it is not a merger. Since the Marvel licenses are non transferable, the rights would revert back to Marvel if there is a sale regardless of who Fox sells to. -

2829:

Speaks to the planning and developing of the phases to be connected within themselves and the larger narrative of the MCU. So I don't necessarily think there needs to be another definition, but I'll still see if a source explaining such exists. -

2042:, if the editor's object was to make sure that more people were aware of their edit, then they are perfectly fine with listing it here. I obviously being the one to make the edits that were reverted, appreciate it when editors are collaborative.-- 2806:

Yes, the "Phases" are a way Marvel groups their films together, with each generally leading to an Avengers film at the end of the phase. I can see if there is a source out there that can be used to add something to this effect in the article. -

2909: 4817:

I noticed that the fourth Avengers film was titled Avengers: Reassembled. However, the title for this film has not been announced yet, so I suggest changing the title in the table from "Avengers: Reassembled" back to "Untitled Avengers Film".

312:

is going into its fifth season and Gregg has been a main cast member since the beginning, the article body already covers this, since it's not intuitive to take each episode of a TV show as an independent work -- again, by that logic most of

4509:

Whatever you guys think works. I just think that the later articles, like A:IW 3 & 4 should somehow reflect the updates to his armor. The media is talking notice, as seen in the ref I added above, so perhaps we should should as well. -

4320:

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) is an American media franchise and shared universe Phil Coulson, portrayed by Clark Gregg, is an original character to the MCU and the only character to appear across all the different media of the MCU.

3027:. I am not sure that this information is necessarily fancruft. Are you suggesting that the release dates should be cited? If so, that might have been more easily remedied by initiating discussion instead of wholesale removal. Thoughts? - 2056:

If that was the intent, it was not phrased in that way. It reads as if it was about this page and I responded as such. Had DisneyMetalhead referenced and/or linked to the page in question, I would have responded differently, if at all. -

3459:

Assuming we got analysis too, about how the photo shoot featured all the people it did, and that it was meant to start the 10 year celebration planned by the studio. Also potentially about the prizes for the contest they are running. -

3430:? I felt possibly here, but I wasn't sure the best location in this article. The list of films article could also have it, since the celebration is really about the films, and the photo completely ignores all the TV series. Thoughts? - 4198:

The phase three films listed in the table seem to have an extra column, with numbers (maybe running length) in the directors column, shifting all the columns after it one to the right, so they don't match up with the table headings.

160:

Even if it were true that each episode counted as an independent appearance, including that kind of data in the article is not interesting to the reader, when Atwell appeared in two TV series, multiple movies (not even just the

1691:

The same could be said of how did he get from Earth to the space rock he was on? We may not know fully how he traverses space or time, but our lack of knowledge regarding the details doesn't override a quote from Kevin Feige.

4669:

I am adding this here since it sort of applies to all of the pages across this topic, and hopefully somebody has the time to go through all of them (or at least a section or so) and sort this out. It was pointed out to me at

4339:

It doesn't really seem like something that should be noted in the lead. Fans like you and I may be interested in it, but in the scope of the article I think it is a bit much to give it as much weight as you are suggesting. -

2682:

Also, it seems we are in agreement to at least have the table replace what is there currently. I'm going to format up the refs and copy it over, while we continue to discuss if the prose elements should be included or not. -

1924:

If you have an issue with a well-established practice that is used in basically every television-related article on Knowledge, then I'm sure there are far more appropriate places for you to complain about it than here. -

4973:

To close out this, I uploaded it to Commons, a DR was filed, the DR was closed delete, a UDR was filed, and the file was restored. The fair use image was removed from enwiki and we are now using the Commons version.

3945:

last name came to be, and Marvel kept that as the character's name and for the same reason. In addition to this, over the multiple movies others call him Thor Odinson many times. Why was it decided to exclude that?--

879:

I would tweak it to highlight the notability of this achievement: "Phil Coulson, portrayed by Clark Gregg, is an original character to the MCU and the only character to appear across all the different media of the

1396:

I fixed it there, and the change showed up as-desired in an edit preview for this page (no change actually made), but the correction is not showing up on the actual page. Semi-protected needs to allow it through?

3781: 3397:

Even if you had a source for that, that doesn't mean can we add anything that states there is an upcoming IM4. RDJ saying he's "willing to" is a far cry from an actual announced film going into pre-production. -

1671:

I don't understand how he can be same character because he appears in a very wide time range. He appears in 1940s and 2010s. And in all of them he's in same age, has same appearance. How he can be same character

231:

both essentially agreed with me and Dinoslider (insofar as they both seemed to believe the article would be better off without the current sentence, regardless of what they thought should be in its place), while

2653:. We don't need a list article, that information can be found in their individual articles. I really can't get behind the prose in this article, and would rather create a separate list article if it's a must.-- 2621:) where we move the prose out of the table, below it in paragraphs? I don't think the character info should be added to the recurring cast table, again because it is not an "official" part of the universe. - 2872:

I can't be the only one puzzled by this. At the least, it would be informative to document when and where the term first appeared, even if no reliable source explains its meaning. Right now, it's not even

4544:. Maw and Obsidian arrive to retrieve the Time Stone from Strange, drawing the attention of Peter Parker. Maw captures Strange, but fails to take the Time Stone due to an enchantment. Stark and Parker, 4627:

I am unfamiliar with the term 'digital series' and can't find a definition anywhere on WP. What does it mean exactly. I am not a video game user and so I wonder if that is what is meant. Best Regards,

4317:

I was searching for the number designation of the MCU and was a little surprised it wasn't in the lead and had to search for it in the article. Could the lead be changed to something similar to this?

3224:

appear that Constantin and Fox may have a distribution deal in place, and the sale of Fox to Disney may not allow the rights to go back to Marvel. Something to keep in mind if the sale goes through.

1978:

I jus think that given how expansive and continuous the MCU is -- you all are going to run out of colors. What are you going to do then? Also don't *GASP* at other editors at their expense. Let's be

1081: 4746: 2757: 1345: 738:

making cameos in these films has nothing to do with these films in particular, and until a few weeks ago the continuity issue was just a fun joke among fans who think too much about this stuff).

817:

Prior consensus doesn't need to have a previous discussion: it is whatever wording is used until another user disagrees and challenges it. But since you're so hell-bent on needing a discussion,

3915:

No worries. I also would like to take a stab at something, but also know it wouldn't happen anytime soon. The content isn't going anywhere, and it isn't a super big priority in my opinion. -

1906:

Though this has been a trend, isn't it getting rather manotonous? What should happen if two shows/seasons have the same color poster? There's only so many colors in the rainbow. I think that

1634:

I am also against this, since it is still a bit unclear (the article even notes that Feige was being a bit "tongue-in-cheek"), but I have updated our mention of Lee with Feige's quote. -

157:

regular cast has made more appearances than Atwell, Downey, Evans, Hemsworth, Jackson, or Johansson, even though they are, with the (former) exception of Gregg, limited to one TV series.

648:

appearances at all in the lead is irrelevant because it might seem like favoritism. Probably mentioning Coulson at least would be suitable enough. Not sure about the rest (like RDJ). --

3901:

I would like to do these myself, but cannot promise that it would happen any time soon, which is why I thought I'd put it out there in case others wanted to go ahead with it sooner. -

1263: 992:

gets what the real problem here is. I guess I'm partly to blame for that -- I forgot to fill in the "Subject/headline" parameter when I opened this discussion, leaving someone else (

2517:. Should all be in agreement, I will do more work on the references for formatting (and filling them out if I needed. A lot are rough for now) and then add it into the article. - 4739:

Agent Carter has appeared in all the media that Phil Coulson has. You could take it one step further and remove that line all together but thats up to the editors to decide on.

2292:- the lead says "This story is set after the plot of the film, although the iOS and BlackBerry versions stick roughly to the film's plot" so the console version have new content. 2117:"Post-Phase Three" should be "Phase Four" and that same category should include Avengers - Infinity War which will be released on May 4th, 2018. (Yes, Star Wars Day, I know 😂 ) 4474:

Yeah. Because one could ~presume~ that even though we don't see it, he could still have non-nanotech suits. That's a stretch of a justification, but I hope you get the idea. -

2429: 1791:

Correct, an article for the series exists. But as DinoSlider pointed out, it is not confirmed at this time to be a show that exists in the MCU. Thus it is not featured here. -

2585:

Could you lose the prose and combine it all into one table? We could add a video games column to the recurring characters table if you're intent on keeping that information.--

2216:

Yes, little blurbs on each of the other games can probably be included here. I don't think a separate list should be created for them since they are outside the actual MCU. -

4122:

info is available. I don't know if it is big enough to be considered "cultural impact", but it shouldn't be down-played as just Marvel being consistent with itself either. -

3281:- that was initially thought to be the case, but it was later confirmed that The Fantastic Four are a part of the 20th Century Fox buyout, as Disney CEO has stated as much.-- 2262:. If any of the others listed in the navbox are not simply adaptions of the films, they should not be included. And I do believe most of them are, outside the Lego game. - 1166:

Exactly, this article is not for Marvel Studios, it is for the MCU. So why would we use a logo for something else instead of one for what the article is actually about? -

2908:

As my edit summary length ran out, please comment here with what appeared to be a question by you on the good topic status of MCU-related articles. Adding a question to

354:

isn't part of the MCU? Even though the show made sure to include the exact same type of mystic arts as the movie (i.e. portals)? Because Coulson didn't save the day in

3474:

I think it is worth noting somewhere, even if it is a small thing, but I am also unsure as to the best place for it. Probably not in the development section though. -

4323:

Marvel has designated the Marvel Cinematic Universe as Earth-199999 within the continuity of the company's multiverse, a collection of fictional alternate universes.

4034:

The MCU has several tie-in comics, which is already discussed in the article. There is, however, an issue that is not being discussed: the MCU had an impact on the

1393:

I had noticed a rogue colspan reference in the table on this page, but noted table inserted from List_of_Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_television_series#Netflix_series

843:

So your definition of consensus is what one user snuck into an article and managed to get it to stick for some arbitrary length of time? You didn't reestablish the

2353:

So then we have 5 (these + lego) out of the 7 games with different stories. Isn't it strange then leaving 2 games out? Also, then what's the verdict for these 4?--

2532:

Are you thinking of adding that here? It just seems like a pretty big and intrusive table for a group of things that are only sort-of related to the franchise. -

1148:

Because this article is called "Marvel Cinematic Universe" and the current image is an official Marvel representation of those words together. Please look to the

1774:

There's a Knowledge page for the team listing it as a release for the freeform shows. Unless you mean it might not be connected to anything else. I don't knoe.

3427: 2022: 417:

Regardless of whether it is cited, factually correct, or intuitively obvious, the fact is never mentioned in the article, so why should it be in the lead? -

4953:, but for some reason cannot get that version linked correctly in the infobox. Anyone want to give it a go? We can delete the fair-use version one as well. 4675: 3589:

Does anyone else think that the feature films table should include Rotten Tomatoes ratings? It would give people an idea of how popular/good the movies are

2776:

term used elsewhere, and was expecting an explanation here. Even if it's just an arbitrary grouping used by Marvel, it seems like that should be mentioned

165:

movies), and continued to cross over between the two rather than "transitioning" to TV like Coulson (who, as I said above, is still "dead" in the movies).

2984:, point #7. Additionally, all Featured Topics need to be kept up to date and have certain retention periods to meet. All that necessary info is linked. - 2513:

In my attempt to copy edit this content, I realized that a table would actually be the better way to go, as suggested by Triiiple. Please find that table

193:

On top of that, this type of claim must not be included in the lead unless also verified in the article body, regardless of whether it is accurate or not.

4730:

Phil Coulson, portrayed by Clark Gregg, is an original character to the MCU and the only character to appear across all the different media of the MCU.

1884:

This is a TV thing, which is why we don't do it for the films. The colours come from the posters for each season—go to any of the season articles (i.e.

4179:

I should have rephrased my question to "Why isn't it mentioned in the "Other studios" section?" But I didn't see that it was mentioned. Thanks though.

4188: 4158: 97: 89: 84: 1264:

https://www.comicbookmovie.com/venom/venom-is-a-part-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe-according-to-spider-man-homecoming-producer-amy-pascal-a151869

818: 200: 72: 67: 59: 2823:

A year later, Feige felt after the conclusion of Phase Three, Marvel might abandon grouping the films by phases, saying, "it might be a new thing."

3728: 3627: 3056:

Okay, maybe I am missing the in-universe part. Aren't those dates of cinematic release? Are you referring to the arrangement of films by title? -

2018: 727: 653: 2756:

for the WHIH Newsfront, New York Bulletin, and anything that may come next? They don't exactly fall in the same category as Slingshot after all.

922:

Umm... forgive me if I'm mistaken, but I don't recall Coulson appearing or even being mentioned in the streaming shows. The only way one gets to

450:

I don't really have an opinion on this, but as another data point iMDB ninewheels0 has compiled a list of MCU characters by on-screen time here:

3240:

the main examples with a few details, and then further elaborating on the situations with Sony and Fox in the development section. Thoughts? -

1435:

Felt this could maybe be added, but wasn't sure where. Marvel Studios has a giant scroll tracking the events and chronology of all the films.

195:

The last time this came up, there was an edit war on how to calculate who had the most appearances. I tried to help by removing the line with

4255: 1941: 454:-- Coulson is way out in front, followed by Daisy Johnson and Matt Murdock. The first strictly movie character is Tony Stark in 12th place. 2386:

as the time spent researching the games and finding the references took too much time. If it fits better as a stand-alone list, go ahead. --

675:

other Wikipedians) think it should be. It needs to be in the body, and needs a source that explicitly supports it, as otherwise we are just

2043: 1983: 1907: 1870: 1850: 1189: 4039:

line-ups, Phil Coulson migrates to the comic book universe, Quicksilver & the Scarlet Witch are no longer mutants, etc. Some sources:

2827:

These are put together at company retreats, which the studio holds every "18 months or so" to plan out and develop the phases of the MCU.

3382: 3320: 2723:

I have converted the section to a table, as discussed. Regarding the prose that I had included in my sandbox, I've created a new option

2414:

Can we convert it to table instead? It still seems to weighty. We don't even go into that much detail about the films in this article.--

1231:

The image of this article must be the one that is an accurate representation of the material in the article. The current one is that. -

1085: 4900: 4750: 3538: 3209:

about the impact of such a deal before it is actually made, as everything will depend on the terms and the fine print of such a deal.

2761: 1349: 723: 649: 169:

speculate that that was planned), removal of valid maintenance tags without addressing the issue is generally considered disruptive.

4355: 2968: 2244:

I thought we kept them off the same we kept the novelizations off, since for the most part they are just adaptations of the films.--

1006:)) to recontextualize my comment in light of something I wasn't interested in talking about. I've renamed this section accordingly. 4407: 3769: 3158: 2972: 1287:

I think I have added them in a way that doesn't imply that Marvel Studios is working on them. See also the list of films page. -

1003: 821:, with no consensus to change or update the wording as it was; this is what stood as current/prior consensus. And stop with your 677:

counting up numbers of episodes and/or seasons and arbitrarily measuring them against films based on our personal interpretations

2371:

that the Hulk game is also very loosely based on the movie and apart the beginning and the end, the whole story is different. --

1676:

EDIT: Ok I get it now, theory suggests he might a character like Uatu the Watcher but still against it because it's not clear -

4635: 3961: 469: 4044: 3727:. Placeholder dates for untitled projects are not added. They will be once films get attached to them. See the info noted at 2301: 1534: 1454:

Perhaps after the Earth-199999 info we could add a line saying Marvel started keeping a scroll tracking the films' events? -

1015: 950: 857: 807: 747: 688: 615: 573: 509: 328: 264: 180: 122: 47: 17: 4354:

That line about Coulson also hasn't been true for years, as he doesn't appear in the Netflix shows or other recent spinoffs.

4254:'Recurring cast and characters' section should be updated to include Wolfgang von Strucker's appearance in Agents of SHIELD 2310:- sounds like this maybe be after the events? Also, its an endless runner, this really cant be an adaptation of any story :) 1133:. With that in mind, why don't we use the official Marvel Studios logo as thus far it has only been used for MCU releases?-- 1514:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1142: 2877:

clear whether it's an official term or fanspeak the company adopted. (I would guess the former, but that's just a guess.)

2307: 1730:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

3132:

separate from the comic version of the character despite being in only one film. Relatively minor MCU characters such as

4583:

I think it’s best we change the cast discription. We can also added sourced information about specifics of the upgrade.—

2161: 431:

Just throwing in my two cents: one of the things I mentioned last time this debate came up was that we could count each

150: 4854: 3825: 3042:

Release dates are not fancruft, but a table that gives an in-universe chronology certainly is. This was a good lift.

2821:

Actually, reviewing the article, there is definition of the term in two places: 1) In the "Development/Films" section

1580: 1519:

Kevin Feige recently confirmed that Lee has been playing the same character in every film he's appeared in within the

601:

clarifying in some fashion that he has made the most "cross-over" between MCU media. (My opinion is actually that he

294:

has said he regrets the latter, and that isn't even getting into the behind-the-scenes drahms that heated up in 2015.

245:; adam also appears to have backpedaled that position, as he was the one who blanked the sentence after I tagged it). 2724: 2618: 2599: 2514: 1526: 1063: 38: 3688:

add the MCU release dates: 5/1/2020 7/31/2020 11/6/2020 5/7/2021 7/30/2021 11/5/2021 2/18/2022 5/6/2022 7/29/2022

3567:

I for one think that story writers on films where they are different from the screenwriters, should be included.--

3070:

The order was determined by a presumed in-universe chronological order. Everything else is already in the page. -

338:

That just seems stupid to me. (Not you personally, Mr. Hijiri88, only your argument.) The films might be ignoring

4796: 4412: 4259: 4233: 3987: 3950: 3810: 3693: 3667: 3613: 3572: 3286: 2850: 2194: 2096: 2007: 1915: 1811: 1520: 1436: 1322: 1277: 1138: 1105: 4674:, during an unrelated discussion, that there is a potential accessibility issue at some of our articles such as 4645:

It's just a series of videos made for digital release (on YouTube, for example). It doesn't really qualify as a

1217:

lots of films, plus a whole lot of other things. It doesn't make sense to use that logo over the current one. -

4912: 4588: 4493: 4184: 4154: 4149:

article? Is that because it hasn't been confirmed yet if any of these characters will be brought into the MCU?

4112: 4074: 3969: 3878: 3635: 3450: 3089: 3061: 3032: 2958: 2703: 2658: 2607: 2590: 2558: 2419: 2249: 2047: 1987: 1945: 1854: 1697: 1658: 1570: 1193: 885: 635: 590: 397:

It's an obvious and intuitive approach, and if you disagree, I'll just let Favre1fan93 step up to the plate. --

4872:

There is no way the infobox photos is copyrighted, right? Seems like it is the definition of just being text.

4415:) I know there are some regular editors that maintain these pages, so I figured I'd suggest it here. Cheers - 2461:

When you finish your c/e could you also update the lead? It currently lists the Lego game as the only game. --

1874: 4576: 4527: 4432: 2190: 1560: 1546: 1272:

will be as well. They both need to be added to this page. On another note, you need to sign your comments.^--

4792: 4632: 4229: 4015: 3663: 3386: 3324: 3129: 2289: 2154: 2120:

I actually just created an account because I couldnt believe this mistake so please fix it I beg of you 😂

2092: 2011: 1991: 1878: 1576: 1557: 1543: 1402: 1318: 4708:

to mention this stuff. It is, after all, a single university course, a curiosity, but nothing much more. --

4452:

Dropping it, or trading it for something generic like "highly advanced", or something along those lines? -

2130: 4402: 4394: 4059: 3982:

How does that negate the fact that he introduces himself as "Thor Odinson" throughout each of the films?--

3821: 3765: 3689: 3542: 3305: 3229: 3214: 3179: 2846: 3752: 3445:

What info are you planning to include? I'm not sure its worth mentioning without some sort of analysis.--

1693: 1654: 1566: 4766: 4683: 4671: 4654: 4479: 4443: 4374: 4359: 4345: 4300: 4127: 4089: 4084:

I would agree with TriiipleThreat that it should go in "Other media" with the guidebook information.. -

3920: 3906: 3892: 3863: 3840: 3736: 3594: 3558: 3508: 3494: 3479: 3465: 3435: 3260: 3245: 2989: 2922: 2835: 2812: 2737: 2688: 2673: 2640: 2626: 2602:

is what I am talking about. We don't even go it specifics about the content of the films on this page.--

2572: 2537: 2522: 2452: 2437: 2405: 2344: 2267: 2221: 1960: 1930: 1897: 1825: 1796: 1716: 1639: 1498: 1473: 1459: 1444: 1420: 1364: 1292: 1236: 1222: 1171: 1157: 1113: 1030: 965: 913: 899: 834: 764: 546: 393:

appearances together? Or do we need Kevin Feige to clarify everything for us? I agree with Favre1fan93:

153:. Anyway, if each episode of a TV series counts as an "appearance in the MCU", then every member of the 4438:

I'm okay with a slight reword if necessary. Or simply dropping "electromechanical" as the adjective. -

2025:. Your argument does not apply here since there are so many directors across several types of media. - 1540: 1398: 2126: 829:

of disputed material in articles (as I did, twice) is necessary and acceptable during a discussion. -

306:

s secondary cast until 2011.) It's not enough to say that since the body of the article mentions that

4742: 3983: 3946: 3806: 3789: 3761: 3757: 3609: 3568: 3534: 3378: 3344: 3316: 3282: 3199: 3154: 3146: 3075: 3047: 2295: 2062: 2030: 2003: 1911: 1889: 1885: 1807: 1764: 1603: 1597: 1586: 1273: 1134: 1077: 997: 979: 711: 627: 457: 441: 422: 405: 398: 280: 276: 237: 233: 209: 4989: 4968: 4944: 4916: 4893: 4861: 4827: 4770: 4754: 4720: 4687: 4658: 4639: 4614: 4592: 4497: 4483: 4469: 4447: 4378: 4363: 4349: 4333: 4304: 4286: 4263: 4208: 4173: 4131: 4116: 4093: 4078: 4063: 4019: 3991: 3973: 3954: 3924: 3910: 3896: 3882: 3867: 3844: 3829: 3814: 3793: 3773: 3740: 3711: 3697: 3639: 3617: 3598: 3576: 3562: 3546: 3512: 3498: 3483: 3469: 3454: 3439: 3415: 3390: 3358: 3348: 3328: 3290: 3264: 3249: 3233: 3218: 3203: 3183: 3162: 3093: 3079: 3065: 3051: 3036: 2993: 2975: 2962: 2926: 2886: 2854: 2839: 2816: 2793: 2765: 2741: 2707: 2692: 2677: 2662: 2644: 2630: 2611: 2594: 2576: 2562: 2541: 2526: 2470: 2456: 2441: 2423: 2409: 2395: 2380: 2368: 2362: 2348: 2323: 2276:

I'm reading the articles and I'm not really sure you can call them film adaptations. A few examples:

2271: 2253: 2239: 2225: 2210: 2178: 2134: 2066: 2051: 2034: 1964: 1949: 1934: 1919: 1901: 1858: 1829: 1815: 1800: 1783: 1768: 1749: 1720: 1701: 1685: 1662: 1643: 1627: 1607: 1539:. Therefore, I believe that Stan Lee should be added to the Recurring Characters section. See Here: 1502: 1477: 1463: 1448: 1424: 1406: 1382: 1368: 1353: 1296: 1281: 1240: 1226: 1211: 1197: 1175: 1161: 1117: 1089: 1034: 1020: 983: 969: 955: 917: 903: 889: 862: 838: 812: 768: 752: 731: 715: 693: 657: 639: 620: 594: 578: 550: 514: 479:

IMDb is self-published and unverifiable. It may be "accurate", but it's completely irrelevant (even

473: 445: 426: 412: 333: 284: 269: 213: 185: 127: 4923: 4908: 4584: 4551:, pursue Maw's spaceship, Banner contacts Steve Rogers, and Wong stays behind to guard the Sanctum. 4539: 4489: 4200: 4180: 4150: 4108: 4070: 3965: 3874: 3631: 3590: 3446: 3085: 3057: 3028: 3018: 2954: 2903: 2729: 2699: 2654: 2603: 2586: 2554: 2508: 2415: 2245: 2149: 1910:'s point holds validity in that it really isn't needed. It's becoming rather messy in my opinion.-- 1779: 1745: 1378: 881: 844: 826: 631: 586: 465: 4819: 4164:

It's mentioned in the last paragraph of the first section ("Development/Films") of the article. -

385:

main cast have done any crossovers, so while they may have more appearances, they do not have any

4628: 4204: 4011: 3707: 1846: 1623: 1207: 1012: 947: 854: 822: 804: 744: 685: 669: 612: 570: 506: 325: 261: 224: 177: 119: 4054:

Should this go in "other media", a new section of "Cultural impact", or some different article?

3604:

Maybe in a critical reception section...but I don't think it's absolutely needed in an already

1415:

the page to have it update. Your edit on the TV series list was correct and fixed the issue. -

4823: 4714: 4600: 4562: 4513: 4455: 4418: 4272: 4055: 3401: 3368: 3355: 3278: 3225: 3210: 3175: 2174: 4048: 4982: 4961: 4937: 4886: 4762: 4701: 4679: 4650: 4475: 4439: 4370: 4341: 4329: 4296: 4169: 4123: 4085: 3916: 3902: 3888: 3859: 3836: 3732: 3554: 3504: 3490: 3475: 3461: 3431: 3274: 3270: 3256: 3241: 3124: 2985: 2918: 2831: 2808: 2733: 2684: 2669: 2650: 2636: 2622: 2568: 2548: 2533: 2518: 2504: 2466: 2448: 2433: 2401: 2391: 2376: 2358: 2340: 2319: 2263: 2235: 2217: 2206: 1956: 1926: 1893: 1842: 1821: 1792: 1712: 1711:

The info regarding this is properly noted below the table. He should not be in the table. -

1681: 1635: 1494: 1469: 1455: 1440: 1416: 1360: 1288: 1232: 1218: 1185: 1181: 1167: 1153: 1109: 1026: 961: 909: 895: 830: 784: 760: 558: 542: 136: 2258:

I seem to maybe recall that? But I do agree with that feeling. So I'd hold off a sec there

4848: 4705: 4532:

Another way to go would be mentioning it in the plot as opposed to the cast credits, eg;

3785: 3340: 3195: 3150: 3137: 3071: 3043: 2882: 2789: 2058: 2039: 2026: 1979: 1760: 1593: 1412: 993: 975: 707: 437: 418: 228: 205: 4950: 4878:

Unless someone objects, I will find a higher resolution and amend the copyright status.

4292: 2304:- the plot sounds like an adventure from WW2 but maybe not the story we saw in the film? 3190: 1775: 1741: 1374: 1149: 702: 538: 497: 461: 3119: 2825:

This states how Marvel groups their films; and 2) In the "Business practices" section

1068:- "Marvel's Runaways" is missing in the TV list. Hulu will premiere it in early 2018. 223:

agree. They didn't even come to a compromise: at the time the discussion petered out,

3703: 3626:

The reception section is for the universe as a whole. For the individual films, see

2981: 1740:

Freeform.I would do it but Knowledge spreadsheets are more confusing than I thought.

1619: 1203: 1100:, it was just a comment from someone involved that may or may not be precise. As for 1007: 942: 849: 799: 739: 680: 607: 565: 501: 320: 256: 172: 114: 4488:

Maybe high-tech, “highly advanced suit of armor” could still mean late Middle Ages.—

3503:

We can sit on it for a while, this discussion here should remind us if we forget. -

1493:

The information has been noted properly as prose in the "Recurring cast" section. -

988:

So am I. Which is exactly why I find it so annoying that it seems increasingly like

4710: 4554: 4144:

Other Studios: Acquisition of Fox's Rights To X-Men & Fantastic Four Characters

3336: 2167: 1756: 676: 2400:

It looks okay, structurally. But I'm going to c/e it some and move refs around. -

3120:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Captain_America_in_other_media#Marvel_Cinematic_Universe

2910:

Knowledge:WikiProject Film/Marvel Cinematic Universe task force/Good Topic status

2553:

It looks a lot less intrusive than the prose currently included in the article.--

929:

the relatively few characters to appear across all the different media of the MCU

4977: 4956: 4932: 4904: 4881: 4547: 4325: 4165: 3133: 3111:

in "___ in other media" pages (or the pages dedicated to their comic versions):

2500: 2462: 2387: 2372: 2354: 2315: 2259: 2231: 2202: 1677: 1064:

http://comicbook.com/marvel/2017/06/01/marvel-the-punisher-netflix-premiere-date

626:

your idea of counting the number crossovers instead (Greg does crossover from a

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4040: 4842: 4646: 4398: 2878: 2864:

the ordinary meaning. Furthermore, as your definition says, there should be a

2801: 2785: 1630:

Since he is merely a cameo without a proper character or influence, i say no.

4736:

Phil Coulson, portrayed by Clark Gregg, is an original character to the MCU.

491:

emphasizes the films, so ignoring the films -- and saying that one season of

480: 4107:

You’re suggesting we split this information on imaginary in-universe lines.—

3114: 496:

since no one has provided a good reason that this should be an exception to

500:-- "The TV shows are part of the universe!" has nothing to do with this. 451: 106:

Potentially debatable claims should not be in the lead if not in the body

3125:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Thor_(Marvel_Comics)_in_other_media#Live-action

2649:

I still think the prose takes up too much real estate and adds too much

1202:

There is no other official logo for the MCU so what would you suggest?--

1072: 4761:

Statement is valid. Peggy Carter never appeared in a digital series. -

2936:

page is used for that, when a normal subpage can be utilized. But okay.

2339:

Yeah the ones you listed seem to be divergent of the film's stories. -

3753:

http://ew.com/movies/2018/03/09/marvel-studios-kevin-feige-mcu-future/

1739:

We should really add a row for the New Warriors under Television : -->

1468:

That was one option. Another was in the business practices section. -

924:

the only character to appear across all the different media of the MCU

253:

avoid anyone having to actually do that by themselves is ... not good.

4676:

Production of Avengers: Infinity War and the untitled Avengers sequel

2189:

I just noticed that the only video game mentioned in the article is

346:

surely isn't neglecting the larger MCU. Are you saying that because

3084:

Aww, fuck me; I totally missed the rest of the tables. So sorry. -

2617:

which has been here pretty much the longest). How about a version (

151:

any prior consensus could be easily invalidated by a new discussion

4069:

The "Other media" section with the other comic book information.--

4041:

15 Ways The MCU Changed Marvel Comics (And You Didn’t Even Notice)

3873:

No objections here on either account; attractions or video games.—

2971:

for good and featured topics? That's where our "rush" comes from.

1389:

Glitch in TV series table of Netflix series for Luke Cage season 2

1104:, we do not have confirmation yet that it is part of the MCU. See 2432:

or the like, with just a short paragraph here linking to that. -

2193:, while the navbox has 7 games in it. Should they be added under 3729:

List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films#Other potential projects

630:

perspective, we should leave in-universe details out of this).--

4143: 2428:

This honestly looks like something that should be developed at

4780: 4217: 3805:

purpose of omitting the story writers? Someone enlighten me.--

3651: 2080: 1306: 1152:

article for the current Marvel Studios logo in the infobox. -

25: 2967:

Subpages don't exist in article space. Are you familiar with

2567:

Agreed. Hence why I went with a table and not a prose c/e. -

1059:- Netflix' "The Punisher" will be released in November 2017. 4700:. Fair enough, I see some media mentions, but it seems like 4045:

How The Marvel Cinematic Universe Has Transformed The Comics

3115:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Iron_Man_in_other_media#Live-action

2635:

Alright, I could probably get behind that latest version. -

4693:

Mention of a course teaching about Marvel - trivia/undue?

2752: 1600:) Other than it being a continuity error, I support it. 298:

and not backed up by anything in the body of the article.

290:

in the film and brought him back in the first episode of

3751:

Black Panther 2 is officially confirmed by Kevin Feige:

3702:

What does these dates refer to? And is there a source?--

4698: 4649:, which is a full television series released online. - 3012: 2980:

ROttT is correct. These types of pages are allowed per

2913: 931:. There's nothing wrong with this arbitrary definition 395:

this is factually correct. an episode is an appearance.

379:

main cast have outstripped Atwell and Jackson combined.

317:

main cast have outstripped Atwell and Jackson combined.

196: 141: 4907:

prefers the actual intertitle over user recreations.--

3255:

I agree with exploring something along these lines. -

2780:. And if there's more to it than that, then it should 1373:

Don't forget about the Fantastic Four and Mutants(?)

4726:

the opening sentence about Phil Coulson is not valid

4269:

Do you have refs or season & episode numbers? -

2430:

List of Marvel Cinematic Universe video game tie-ins

2747:

WHIH Newsfront & New York Bulletin viral videos

1359:They can name their universe whatever they want. - 2021:page and you already started a discussion on that 3303:In the Post-Phase Three section, they only state 2367:Been going over the references and it seems from 2230:Ok, I'll add something based on the articles. -- 4557:. Suggested additions are in green with links.) 606:most number of appearances? Does that matter?" 2314:Anyways, let me know as its basically done. -- 2298:- the plot section doesn't sound like the film 1735:New Warriors Row (Television Section Addition) 4049:Ways the MCU changed the comics it comes from 3106:MCU characters should have their own articles 2077:Semi-protected edit request on 14 August 2017 1431:Official Marvel Studios scroll for chronology 1073:https://en.wikipedia.org/Runaways_(TV_series) 199:, but it was reverted as well. The resulting 8: 4553:(This is a section of the current plot from 4214:Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2018 4777:Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2018 3648:Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2018 3339:that states there will be an Iron Man 4. - 1303:Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2017 974:I am fine with TriiipleThreat's wording. - 4740: 4542:stored in an arc reactor worn on his chest 4004:A minor point: That really would be Thor 3755: 3532: 3426:Where is the best spot to include info on 3376: 3314: 3144: 3130:Christopher Nolan's Joker has his own page 1601: 1584: 1075: 455: 1531:appearance as a Federal Express Agent in 4875:File:Marvel Cinematic Universe logo.png 4369:(and the MCU tie-in comic books too). - 1759:stating that this show is in the MCU. - 1096:That was not an actual announcement for 3628:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films 2447:are for the "in canon" material too. - 2195:Marvel Cinematic Universe#Outside media 2019:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films 1820:What the hell are you talking about? - 1082:2A02:810C:C5C0:289C:E90B:8C3D:1918:2BE8 4747:2001:569:7C20:CF00:38F9:77D9:28DF:29A9 4545: 4537: 3553:What do you think is wrong with it? - 2826: 2822: 2758:2A02:587:8020:1700:94D1:9300:A141:4EE1 2017:The events you referenced were on the 1589:comment added 04:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC) 1346:2001:569:7C20:CF00:4F28:8ADA:83CE:658A 928: 923: 722:me, Stan "The Man" Lee" cameo guy. -- 394: 374: 350:didn't feature or mention Quake, that 192: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4711:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2698:out are not "officially" connected.-- 1055:Proposing Changes: Punisher, Runaways 452:http://www.imdb.com/list/ls033828946/ 7: 2201:article be created for the games? -- 1510:The following discussion is closed. 1123: 1071:It already has a Knowledge article: 537:the simple calculations (allowed by 4008:, (literally, "Thor, son of Odin.") 3585:Rotten Tomatoes Feature Films Table 3354:Despite millions of fans hoping... 796:you need to link to said discussion 381:Yep. Spot-on. However, none of the 4901:File:Marvel Cinematic Universe.png 3371:already said he could do one more 1888:) and you'll see what I mean. See 1573:) - Feige is quoted as saying it. 825:on topic bans. Reestablishing the 275:didn't really think it through. -- 24: 3313:3. Shouldn't we add Iron Man 4? 3189:This is already mentioned on the 706:it will always be contentious. - 4833: 4784: 4408:electromechanical suits of armor 4221: 3718: 3655: 2140: 2084: 1845:be careful with your vulgarity. 1726:The discussion above is closed. 1310: 1025:Adding in Triiiple's wording. - 29: 4313:Marvel Earth number designation 149:the only MCU TV series) and so 3858:also probably be worked on. - 3780:There is already a discussion 2766:23:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC) 2302:Captain America: Super Soldier 1535:Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 894:I'm fine with that wording. - 18:Talk:Marvel Cinematic Universe 1: 4536:Strange recruits Tony Stark, 3992:20:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC) 3640:21:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC) 3630:which does have a RT table.-- 3618:20:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC) 3599:19:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC) 3577:20:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC) 3265:06:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 3250:01:34, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 3163:04:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC) 3094:18:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3080:14:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3066:11:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3052:02:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3037:02:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 2994:16:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC) 2976:05:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC) 2963:01:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC) 2927:00:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC) 2308:Iron Man 3: The Official Game 724:Anythingspossibleforapossible 650:Anythingspossibleforapossible 375:again, by that logic most of 191:I agree with this statement: 3974:16:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 3964:as Thor, not Thor Odinson.-- 3955:15:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 3820:I am also wondering this. -- 3815:18:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 3563:07:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC) 3547:22:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC) 3513:20:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC) 3499:17:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC) 3484:21:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC) 3470:20:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC) 3455:18:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC) 3440:18:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC) 3416:15:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC) 3391:03:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC) 3359:00:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC) 3349:23:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC) 3329:23:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC) 3291:18:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 3234:02:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 3219:02:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 3204:01:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 3184:01:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 2887:18:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 2855:07:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC) 2840:22:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 2817:22:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 2794:19:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 4811:to reactivate your request. 4799:has been answered. Set the 4597:Fine with me either way. - 4248:to reactivate your request. 4236:has been answered. Set the 3682:to reactivate your request. 3670:has been answered. Set the 3015:of the release chronology, 2742:03:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 2708:08:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC) 2693:03:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC) 2678:03:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC) 2663:09:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 2645:06:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 2631:03:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 2612:15:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 2595:06:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 2577:03:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 2563:15:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 2542:05:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 2527:01:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 2179:01:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC) 2135:01:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC) 2111:to reactivate your request. 2099:has been answered. Set the 1755:We currently do not have a 1337:to reactivate your request. 1325:has been answered. Set the 1124:Page's Logo needs to change 5010: 4969:08:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC) 4945:08:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC) 4917:15:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC) 4894:06:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC) 4433:00:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC) 4305:21:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC) 4287:20:47, 28 April 2018 (UTC) 4264:16:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC) 4209:14:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC) 4189:03:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC) 4174:00:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC) 4159:23:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC) 4132:23:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 4117:06:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 4094:04:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 4079:17:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC) 4064:17:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC) 4020:12:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC) 3925:02:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 3911:02:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 3897:01:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 3883:01:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 3868:00:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 3845:04:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC) 3830:16:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC) 3794:01:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC) 3774:08:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC) 2771:No explanation of "phases" 2471:20:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC) 2457:18:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 2442:23:17, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 2424:20:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 2410:20:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 2396:16:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 2067:13:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC) 2052:23:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1992:23:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1965:18:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 1950:16:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC) 1859:23:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1644:22:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC) 1628:18:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC) 1549:18:18 29 April 2017 (UTC) 1527:Captain America: Civil War 4990:19:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC) 4862:00:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC) 4828:19:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC) 4797:Marvel Cinematic Universe 4389:Update for Stark's armor? 4234:Marvel Cinematic Universe 3741:00:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 3712:21:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 3698:20:52, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 3668:Marvel Cinematic Universe 3531:Anyone going to fix it? 3023:offered as edit summary: 2917:discussion can be had. - 2381:23:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2363:21:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2349:20:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2324:18:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2272:18:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2254:18:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2240:17:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2226:17:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2211:17:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 2097:Marvel Cinematic Universe 2035:19:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 2012:18:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 1935:22:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 1920:18:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 1902:04:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 1879:03:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 1849:is a real thing. Chill.-- 1830:04:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 1816:02:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 1608:18:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 1521:Marvel Cinematic Universe 1503:22:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 1369:03:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC) 1354:02:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC) 1323:Marvel Cinematic Universe 1297:23:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC) 1282:18:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC) 1106:Talk:Runaways (TV series) 4771:03:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 4755:02:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 4721:03:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 4688:09:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC) 4659:09:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC) 4640:12:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC) 4548:new Stark-designed armor 4393:In the cast listing for 1955:the IP is suggesting. - 1892:for more information. - 1801:21:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC) 1784:22:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 1769:15:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 1750:13:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 1728:Please do not modify it. 1721:23:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 1702:22:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 1686:21:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 1663:22:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 1512:Please do not modify it. 1486:Stan Lee Same Character. 1478:22:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1464:22:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1449:18:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1425:16:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1407:08:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1383:14:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 1241:15:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC) 1227:22:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC) 1212:19:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC) 1198:19:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC) 1176:04:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC) 1162:04:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC) 1143:03:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC) 1118:22:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC) 1090:21:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC) 1035:17:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC) 1021:04:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC) 984:16:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC) 970:04:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC) 956:23:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 918:21:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 904:19:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 890:19:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 863:06:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC) 839:04:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC) 813:23:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 769:19:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 753:15:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 732:15:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 716:15:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 694:15:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 658:14:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 640:16:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 621:15:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 595:13:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 579:07:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 551:04:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 515:20:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 474:17:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 446:16:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 427:15:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 413:14:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 334:06:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 285:03:09, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 270:23:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 214:22:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 186:20:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 128:04:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC) 4615:08:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 4593:07:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 4577:04:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 4528:14:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 4498:09:35, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 4484:04:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 4470:04:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 4448:03:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 4379:23:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 4364:05:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 4350:20:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC) 4334:18:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC) 4295:). I'm adding it in. - 3428:the 10 year photo shoot 3311:Guardians of the Galaxy 3025:"in universe fan cruft" 2290:Iron Man 2 (video game) 4395:Avengers: Infinity War 4388: 4194:Film table consistency 3887:Also no objections. - 3306:Spider-Man: Homecoming 3140:have their own pages. 2973:Reach Out to the Truth 2191:Lego Marvel's Avengers 248:And if adam and Favre 4733:should be changed to 2939:As per this comment: 1996: 1863: 1558:Total-Truth-Teller-24 1544:Total-Truth-Teller-24 42:of past discussions. 2953:What is the rush? - 2296:Thor: God of Thunder 2152:for this alteration 1886:Daredevil (season 1) 4951:uploaded to Commons 4540:new, upgraded armor 3527:Feature films table 3422:10 year celebration 2982:WP:SUB#Allowed uses 2897:Good topic question 2162:edit semi-protected 2148:please establish a 1268:Not only that, but 794:need to be tagged, 360:The Winter Soldier' 3007:Chronology removal 1523:; he mentions his 1513: 1270:Black & Silver 4815: 4814: 4757: 4745:comment added by 4610: 4572: 4523: 4465: 4428: 4282: 4252: 4251: 3822:Emir of Knowledge 3776: 3760:comment added by 3686: 3685: 3549: 3537:comment added by 3411: 3393: 3381:comment added by 3369:Robert Downey Jr. 3361: 3331: 3319:comment added by 3279:User:TheLastAmigo 3169:Disney/Fox merger 3165: 3149:comment added by 2969:retention periods 2115: 2114: 1997:Directors' images 1940:Just a thought.-- 1864:TV series' colors 1847:WP:CIVIL/SWEARING 1610: 1590: 1577:BrittonJeanSpears 1511: 1341: 1340: 1092: 1080:comment added by 1018: 953: 860: 810: 750: 691: 673: 618: 576: 512: 476: 460:comment added by 331: 267: 183: 125: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5001: 4987: 4985: 4980: 4966: 4964: 4959: 4942: 4940: 4935: 4927: 4891: 4889: 4884: 4860: 4837: 4836: 4806: 4802: 4788: 4787: 4781: 4717: 4638: 4613: 4608: 4575: 4570: 4526: 4521: 4468: 4463: 4431: 4426: 4285: 4280: 4243: 4239: 4225: 4224: 4218: 3726: 3722: 3721: 3677: 3673: 3659: 3658: 3652: 3414: 3409: 3353: 3022: 2907: 2805: 2552: 2512: 2197:or should a new 2172: 2165: 2144: 2143: 2106: 2102: 2088: 2087: 2081: 1843:User:Adamstom.97 1332: 1328: 1314: 1313: 1307: 1011: 946: 853: 803: 788: 743: 684: 667: 611: 569: 562: 505: 410: 403: 324: 260: 241:each episode of 176: 140: 118: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5009: 5008: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4983: 4978: 4976: 4962: 4957: 4955: 4938: 4933: 4931: 4921: 4887: 4882: 4880: 4870: 4868:Photo copyright 4841: 4834: 4804: 4800: 4785: 4779: 4728: 4719: 4715: 4695: 4667: 4631: 4625: 4606: 4598: 4568: 4560: 4519: 4511: 4461: 4453: 4424: 4416: 4391: 4315: 4278: 4270: 4256:138.251.246.170 4241: 4237: 4222: 4216: 4196: 4146: 4032: 3984:DisneyMetalhead 3947:DisneyMetalhead 3942: 3855: 3807:DisneyMetalhead 3802: 3800:Writing credits 3749: 3747:Black Panther 2 3719: 3717: 3690:Merrit melancon 3675: 3671: 3656: 3650: 3610:DisneyMetalhead 3587: 3569:DisneyMetalhead 3529: 3424: 3407: 3399: 3337:reliable source 3301: 3283:DisneyMetalhead 3171: 3143:Anyone agree? 3138:Trevor Slattery 3108: 3016: 3009: 2932:Not sure why a 2901: 2899: 2885: 2847:ProfessorKilroy 2799: 2792: 2773: 2753:this viral site 2749: 2546: 2498: 2187: 2185:Video game list 2171:(Jalen D. Folf) 2170: 2159: 2141: 2137: 2104: 2100: 2085: 2079: 2040:User:DinoSlider 2004:DisneyMetalhead 1999: 1942:205.122.234.207 1912:DisneyMetalhead 1866: 1808:DisneyMetalhead 1757:reliable source 1737: 1732: 1731: 1616: 1555: 1516: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1488: 1433: 1391: 1330: 1326: 1311: 1305: 1274:DisneyMetalhead 1259: 1135:DisneyMetalhead 1126: 1093: 1066: 1057: 782: 556: 406: 399: 238:User:adamstom97 234:User:Bold Clone 229:User:Rmaynardjr 163:Captain America 142:What consensus? 134: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5007: 5005: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4992: 4947: 4924:TriiipleThreat 4909:TriiipleThreat 4869: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4813: 4812: 4789: 4778: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4727: 4724: 4709: 4694: 4691: 4666: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4624: 4623:Digital series 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4605: 4602: 4585:TriiipleThreat 4580: 4579: 4567: 4564: 4558: 4552: 4546:equipped with 4518: 4515: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4490:TriiipleThreat 4460: 4457: 4423: 4420: 4390: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4314: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4277: 4274: 4250: 4249: 4226: 4215: 4212: 4195: 4192: 4181:Aidensdaddy2k9 4177: 4176: 4151:Aidensdaddy2k9 4145: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4109:TriiipleThreat 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4071:TriiipleThreat 4031: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4009: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3977: 3976: 3966:TriiipleThreat 3960:Because he is 3941: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3875:TriiipleThreat 3854: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3801: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3748: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3684: 3683: 3660: 3649: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3632:TriiipleThreat 3621: 3620: 3586: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3528: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3447:TriiipleThreat 3423: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3406: 3403: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3300: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3237: 3236: 3221: 3206: 3191:Marvel Studios 3170: 3167: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3086:Jack Sebastian 3058:Jack Sebastian 3029:Jack Sebastian 3019:TriiipleThreat 3008: 3005: 3003: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2955:Jack Sebastian 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2937: 2904:Jack Sebastian 2898: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2881: 2870: 2819: 2788: 2784:be explained. 2772: 2769: 2748: 2745: 2730:TriiipleThreat 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2700:TriiipleThreat 2680: 2655:TriiipleThreat 2647: 2604:TriiipleThreat 2587:TriiipleThreat 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2555:TriiipleThreat 2509:TriiipleThreat 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2416:TriiipleThreat 2383: 2365: 2312: 2311: 2305: 2299: 2293: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2246:TriiipleThreat 2186: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2125: 2113: 2112: 2089: 2078: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2044:50.232.205.246 1998: 1995: 1984:50.232.205.246 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1908:65.130.214.136 1871:65.130.214.136 1865: 1862: 1851:50.232.205.246 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1772: 1771: 1736: 1733: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1705: 1704: 1694:AnonWikiEditor 1674: 1673: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1655:AnonWikiEditor 1647: 1646: 1615: 1612: 1606:comment added 1567:AnonWikiEditor 1554: 1551: 1517: 1508: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1371: 1339: 1338: 1315: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1258: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1200: 1190:50.232.205.246 1150:Marvel Studios 1131:Doctor Strange 1125: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1070: 1061: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 940: 936: 882:TriiipleThreat 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 789:Again, please 756: 755: 719: 718: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 645: 644: 643: 642: 632:TriiipleThreat 587:TriiipleThreat 582: 581: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 390: 372: 356:Winter Soldier 348:Doctor Strange 318: 299: 295: 254: 246: 132: 131: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5006: 4991: 4988: 4986: 4981: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4967: 4965: 4960: 4952: 4948: 4946: 4943: 4941: 4936: 4925: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4892: 4890: 4885: 4876: 4873: 4867: 4863: 4858: 4857: 4852: 4851: 4846: 4845: 4840: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4825: 4821: 4810: 4807:parameter to 4798: 4794: 4790: 4783: 4782: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4737: 4734: 4731: 4725: 4723: 4722: 4718: 4712: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4692: 4690: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4677: 4673: 4664: 4660: 4656: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4637: 4634: 4630: 4622: 4616: 4612: 4611: 4607: 4603: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4582: 4581: 4578: 4574: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4556: 4550: 4549: 4543: 4541: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4530: 4529: 4525: 4524: 4520: 4516: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4481: 4477: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4467: 4466: 4462: 4458: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4445: 4441: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4430: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4414: 4410: 4409: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4347: 4343: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4331: 4327: 4324: 4318: 4312: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4294: 4291:It's ep 515 ( 4290: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4261: 4257: 4247: 4244:parameter to 4235: 4231: 4227: 4220: 4219: 4213: 4211: 4210: 4206: 4202: 4193: 4191: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4114: 4110: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4052: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4037: 4029: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4010: 4007: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3940: 3936: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3852: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3754: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3725: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3700: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3681: 3678:parameter to 3669: 3665: 3661: 3654: 3653: 3647: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3584: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3526: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3383:206.45.87.190 3380: 3374: 3370: 3360: 3357: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3321:206.45.87.190 3318: 3312: 3308: 3307: 3298: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3222: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3207: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3192: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3168: 3166: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3141: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3112: 3105: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3020: 3014: 3006: 3004: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2946: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2938: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2915: 2911: 2905: 2896: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2803: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2770: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2754: 2746: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2726: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2681: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2550: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2384: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2300: 2297: 2294: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2169: 2163: 2157: 2156: 2151: 2147: 2139: 2138: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2110: 2107:parameter to 2098: 2094: 2090: 2083: 2082: 2076: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2005: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1890:WP:TVOVERVIEW 1887: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1734: 1729: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1707: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1670: 1669: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1613: 1611: 1609: 1605: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1588: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1552: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1522: 1515: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1485: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1394: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1336: 1333:parameter to 1324: 1320: 1316: 1309: 1308: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1257: 1254: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1054: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1017: 1014: 1009: 1005: 1002: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 981: 977: 973: 972: 971: 967: 963: 959: 958: 957: 952: 949: 944: 941: 937: 934: 930: 925: 921: 920: 919: 915: 911: 907: 906: 905: 901: 897: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 878: 864: 859: 856: 851: 846: 842: 841: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 814: 809: 806: 801: 797: 792: 786: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 766: 762: 754: 749: 746: 741: 736: 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 717: 713: 709: 704: 701: 695: 690: 687: 682: 678: 671: 670:edit conflict 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 655: 651: 641: 637: 633: 629: 628:WP:Real-world 624: 623: 622: 617: 614: 609: 604: 599: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 580: 575: 572: 567: 560: 555: 554: 553: 552: 548: 544: 540: 516: 511: 508: 503: 499: 494: 490: 488: 484: 478: 477: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 453: 449: 448: 447: 443: 439: 434: 430: 429: 428: 424: 420: 416: 415: 414: 411: 409: 404: 402: 396: 391: 388: 384: 380: 378: 373: 370: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336: 335: 330: 327: 322: 319: 316: 314: 308: 307: 300: 296: 293: 288: 287: 286: 282: 278: 273: 272: 271: 266: 263: 258: 255: 251: 247: 244: 239: 235: 230: 226: 222: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 187: 182: 179: 174: 170: 166: 164: 158: 156: 152: 148: 143: 138: 130: 129: 124: 121: 116: 110: 109: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4975: 4954: 4930: 4879: 4877: 4874: 4871: 4855: 4849: 4843: 4838: 4816: 4808: 4793:edit request 4741:— Preceding 4738: 4735: 4732: 4729: 4696: 4668: 4626: 4601: 4599: 4563: 4561: 4559:Thoughts? - 4555:Infinity War 4531: 4514: 4512: 4508: 4456: 4454: 4419: 4417: 4406: 4392: 4322: 4319: 4316: 4273: 4271: 4253: 4245: 4230:edit request 4197: 4178: 4147: 4056:Cambalachero 4053: 4035: 4033: 4005: 3943: 3938: 3856: 3803: 3756:— Preceding 3750: 3723: 3701: 3687: 3679: 3664:edit request 3605: 3588: 3539:83.86.129.86 3533:— Preceding 3530: 3425: 3402: 3400: 3377:— Preceding 3372: 3366: 3335:There is no 3315:— Preceding 3310: 3304: 3302: 3238: 3226:TheLastAmigo 3211:Cambalachero 3176:TheLastAmigo 3172: 3145:— Preceding 3142: 3128: 3123: 3118: 3113: 3109: 3024: 3013:this removal 3010: 3002: 2944: 2933: 2900: 2874: 2865: 2861: 2781: 2777: 2774: 2750: 2722: 2497: 2313: 2198: 2188: 2153: 2145: 2122: 2119: 2116: 2108: 2093:edit request 2000: 1977: 1867: 1840: 1773: 1738: 1727: 1708: 1675: 1617: 1592: 1575: 1565: 1563:- Per Above 1556: 1533: 1532: 1525: 1524: 1518: 1509: 1434: 1399:Wjwarren4269 1395: 1392: 1342: 1334: 1319:edit request 1269: 1267: 1260: 1255: 1130: 1127: 1108:for more. - 1101: 1097: 1076:— Preceding 1067: 1058: 1000: 989: 932: 845:WP:STATUSQUO 827:WP:STATUSQUO 795: 790: 757: 720: 646: 602: 583: 535: 492: 486: 482: 456:— Preceding 432: 407: 400: 389:appearances. 386: 382: 376: 368: 363: 362:s impact on 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 311: 309: 305: 303: 291: 249: 242: 220: 171: 167: 162: 159: 154: 146: 133: 111: 78: 43: 37: 4905:MOS:TVIMAGE 4763:Favre1fan93 4476:Favre1fan93 4440:Favre1fan93 4401:, Stark is 4371:Favre1fan93 4356:70.79.59.95 4297:Favre1fan93 4086:Favre1fan93 3917:Favre1fan93 3889:Favre1fan93 3837:Favre1fan93 3733:Favre1fan93 3491:Favre1fan93 3462:Favre1fan93 3432:Favre1fan93 3309:sequel and 3275:Favre1fan93 3271:Adamstom.97 3257:Favre1fan93 3134:Erik Selvig 2986:Favre1fan93 2919:Favre1fan93 2912:as you did 2832:Favre1fan93 2809:Favre1fan93 2734:Favre1fan93 2685:Favre1fan93 2670:Favre1fan93 2623:Favre1fan93 2569:Favre1fan93 2549:Adamstom.97 2519:Favre1fan93 2505:Adamstom.97 2449:Favre1fan93 2402:Favre1fan93 2341:Favre1fan93 2264:Favre1fan93 2218:Favre1fan93 2127:ForFangirls 1957:Favre1fan93 1793:Favre1fan93 1713:Favre1fan93 1602:—Preceding 1585:—Preceding 1495:Favre1fan93 1470:Favre1fan93 1441:Favre1fan93 1417:Favre1fan93 1233:Favre1fan93 1186:Adamstom.97 1182:Favre1fan93 1154:Favre1fan93 1027:Favre1fan93 962:Favre1fan93 927:also among 896:Favre1fan93 831:Favre1fan93 785:Favre1fan93 761:Favre1fan93 559:Favre1fan93 543:Favre1fan93 225:User:Magegg 137:Favre1fan93 36:This is an 4801:|answered= 4716:reply here 4680:adamstom97 4651:adamstom97 4647:web series 4538:who has a 4399:Avengers 4 4342:adamstom97 4238:|answered= 4124:adamstom97 3903:adamstom97 3860:adamstom97 3853:New splits 3786:DinoSlider 3762:El Loco 96 3672:|answered= 3608:article.-- 3555:adamstom97 3505:adamstom97 3476:adamstom97 3341:DinoSlider 3242:adamstom97 3196:DinoSlider 3151:Shredderzx 3072:DinoSlider 3044:Rcarter555 3011:Regarding 2782:definitely 2637:adamstom97 2534:adamstom97 2434:adamstom97 2166:template. 2158:using the 2123:Goodnight 2101:|answered= 2059:DinoSlider 2027:DinoSlider 1927:adamstom97 1894:adamstom97 1822:adamstom97 1761:DinoSlider 1636:adamstom97 1594:Batman3095 1456:adamstom97 1361:adamstom97 1327:|answered= 1289:adamstom97 1219:adamstom97 1168:adamstom97 1110:adamstom97 994:DinoSlider 976:DinoSlider 910:adamstom97 908:Me too. - 708:DinoSlider 419:DinoSlider 387:cross-over 277:Bold Clone 206:DinoSlider 201:discussion 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 12 85:Archive 11 79:Archive 10 4899:There is 4702:WP:TRIVIA 4672:WT:ACCESS 2778:somewhere 2751:There is 2651:WP:WEIGHT 2619:seen here 2150:consensus 2146:Not done: 2023:talk page 1806:"thus".-- 1776:ToxicReap 1742:ToxicReap 1375:ToxicReap 1008:Hijiri 88 943:Hijiri 88 850:Hijiri 88 800:Hijiri 88 740:Hijiri 88 681:Hijiri 88 608:Hijiri 88 566:Hijiri 88 502:Hijiri 88 462:Bflaminio 321:Hijiri 88 257:Hijiri 88 197:this edit 173:Hijiri 88 115:Hijiri 88 73:Archive 9 68:Archive 8 60:Archive 5 4743:unsigned 4706:WP:UNDUE 4405:having " 4403:noted as 4201:Snowhihi 4051:, etc. 4006:Odinsson 3962:credited 3770:contribs 3758:unsigned 3724:Not done 3704:Refuteku 3606:gigantic 3591:Loki2727 3535:unsigned 3379:unsigned 3373:Iron Man 3317:unsigned 3299:Iron Man 3159:contribs 3147:unsigned 2875:entirely 2866:distinct 1980:WP:CIVIL 1620:Refuteku 1204:Refuteku 1102:Runaways 1098:Punisher 1078:unsigned 1062:Source: 1004:contribs 939:sourced. 485:of the M 470:contribs 458:unsigned 304:Iron Man 4820:Bocks89 4629:Barbara 3939:Odinson 3375:film. 3269:Users: 2869:follow. 2507:, and 2199:list of 2168:jd22292 1982:here.-- 1614:Against 1604:undated 1587:undated 1553:Support 1180:Users: 880:MCU."-- 823:threats 703:WP:CALC 603:doesn't 539:WP:CALC 498:WP:LEAD 377:Agents' 39:archive 4984:(Talk) 4979:Kees08 4963:(Talk) 4958:Kees08 4939:(Talk) 4934:Kees08 4888:(Talk) 4883:Kees08 4665:Images 4326:Gonnym 4166:Brojam 4030:Comics 3367:Well, 2862:beyond 2501:Gonnym 2463:Gonnym 2388:Gonnym 2373:Gonnym 2355:Gonnym 2316:Gonnym 2260:Gonnym 2232:Gonnym 2203:Gonnym 2155:before 1709:Oppose 1678:Tehonk 1561:(talk) 1547:(talk) 1437:Source 990:no one 933:per se 493:Agents 433:season 383:Agents 369:Agents 364:Agents 352:Agents 344:Agents 342:, but 340:Agents 315:Agents 310:Agents 292:Agents 243:Agents 221:didn't 219:users 155:Agents 4844:L293D 4805:|ans= 4791:This 4609:child 4571:child 4522:child 4464:child 4427:child 4281:child 4242:|ans= 4228:This 3937:Thor 3676:|ans= 3662:This 3410:child 2879:Xtifr 2802:Xtifr 2786:Xtifr 2105:|ans= 2091:This 1841:Hey, 1672:then? 1413:Purge 1331:|ans= 1317:This 1256:Venom 408:Clone 16:< 4913:talk 4903:but 4839:Done 4824:talk 4767:talk 4751:talk 4697:Re: 4684:talk 4655:talk 4604:WOLF 4589:talk 4566:WOLF 4517:WOLF 4494:talk 4480:talk 4459:WOLF 4444:talk 4422:WOLF 4397:and 4375:talk 4360:talk 4346:talk 4330:talk 4301:talk 4293:here 4276:WOLF 4260:talk 4205:talk 4185:talk 4170:talk 4155:talk 4128:talk 4113:talk 4090:talk 4075:talk 4060:talk 4036:main 4016:talk 4012:Pine 3988:talk 3970:talk 3951:talk 3921:talk 3907:talk 3893:talk 3879:talk 3864:talk 3841:talk 3826:talk 3811:talk 3790:talk 3784:. - 3782:here 3766:talk 3737:talk 3731:. - 3708:talk 3694:talk 3636:talk 3614:talk 3595:talk 3573:talk 3559:talk 3543:talk 3509:talk 3495:talk 3480:talk 3466:talk 3451:talk 3436:talk 3405:WOLF 3387:talk 3356:wolf 3345:talk 3325:talk 3287:talk 3273:and 3261:talk 3246:talk 3230:talk 3215:talk 3200:talk 3180:talk 3155:talk 3136:and 3090:talk 3076:talk 3062:talk 3048:talk 3033:talk 2990:talk 2959:talk 2934:talk 2923:talk 2914:here 2883:tälk 2851:talk 2836:talk 2813:talk 2790:tälk 2762:talk 2738:talk 2725:here 2704:talk 2689:talk 2674:talk 2659:talk 2641:talk 2627:talk 2608:talk 2600:Here 2591:talk 2573:talk 2559:talk 2538:talk 2523:talk 2515:here 2467:talk 2453:talk 2438:talk 2420:talk 2406:talk 2392:talk 2377:talk 2369:here 2359:talk 2345:talk 2320:talk 2268:talk 2250:talk 2236:talk 2222:talk 2207:talk 2175:talk 2131:talk 2063:talk 2048:talk 2031:talk 2008:talk 1988:talk 1961:talk 1946:talk 1931:talk 1916:talk 1898:talk 1875:talk 1855:talk 1826:talk 1812:talk 1797:talk 1780:talk 1765:talk 1746:talk 1717:talk 1698:talk 1682:talk 1659:talk 1640:talk 1624:talk 1598:talk 1581:talk 1571:talk 1542:. - 1499:talk 1474:talk 1460:talk 1445:talk 1421:talk 1403:talk 1379:talk 1365:talk 1350:talk 1293:talk 1278:talk 1237:talk 1223:talk 1208:talk 1194:talk 1184:and 1172:talk 1158:talk 1139:talk 1114:talk 1086:talk 1031:talk 998:talk 980:talk 966:talk 914:talk 900:talk 886:talk 835:talk 819:here 791:stop 765:talk 728:talk 712:talk 654:talk 636:talk 591:talk 547:talk 483:name 481:the 466:talk 442:talk 423:talk 401:Bold 281:talk 236:and 227:and 210:talk 4803:or 4795:to 4413:ref 4240:or 4232:to 3674:or 3666:to 2103:or 2095:to 1329:or 1321:to 147:and 4949:I 4915:) 4853:• 4826:) 4809:no 4769:) 4753:) 4686:) 4657:) 4636:✉ 4633:✐ 4591:) 4496:) 4482:) 4446:) 4377:) 4362:) 4348:) 4332:) 4303:) 4262:) 4246:no 4207:) 4199:-- 4187:) 4172:) 4157:) 4130:) 4115:) 4092:) 4077:) 4062:) 4047:, 4043:, 4018:) 3990:) 3972:) 3953:) 3923:) 3909:) 3895:) 3881:) 3866:) 3843:) 3828:) 3813:) 3792:) 3772:) 3768:• 3739:) 3710:) 3696:) 3680:no 3638:) 3616:) 3597:) 3575:) 3561:) 3545:) 3511:) 3497:) 3482:) 3468:) 3453:) 3438:) 3389:) 3347:) 3327:) 3289:) 3263:) 3248:) 3232:) 3217:) 3202:) 3182:) 3161:) 3157:• 3092:) 3078:) 3064:) 3050:) 3035:) 2992:) 2961:) 2925:) 2853:) 2845:-- 2838:) 2815:) 2764:) 2740:) 2706:) 2691:) 2676:) 2661:) 2643:) 2629:) 2610:) 2593:) 2575:) 2561:) 2540:) 2525:) 2503:, 2469:) 2455:) 2440:) 2422:) 2408:) 2394:) 2379:) 2361:) 2347:) 2322:) 2270:) 2252:) 2238:) 2224:) 2209:) 2177:) 2164:}} 2160:{{ 2133:) 2109:no 2065:) 2050:) 2033:) 2010:) 1990:) 1963:) 1948:) 1933:) 1918:) 1900:) 1877:) 1857:) 1828:) 1814:) 1799:) 1782:) 1767:) 1748:) 1719:) 1700:) 1684:) 1661:) 1642:) 1626:) 1618:-- 1501:) 1476:) 1462:) 1447:) 1439:- 1423:) 1405:) 1381:) 1367:) 1352:) 1335:no 1295:) 1280:) 1239:) 1225:) 1210:) 1196:) 1174:) 1160:) 1141:) 1116:) 1088:) 1033:) 1019:) 1016:やや 982:) 968:) 954:) 951:やや 916:) 902:) 888:) 861:) 858:やや 837:) 811:) 808:やや 767:) 751:) 748:やや 730:) 714:) 692:) 689:やや 679:. 656:) 638:) 619:) 616:やや 593:) 577:) 574:やや 549:) 513:) 510:やや 472:) 468:• 444:) 438:RM 425:) 358:, 332:) 329:やや 283:) 268:) 265:やや 250:do 212:) 184:) 181:やや 126:) 123:やや 94:→ 64:← 4926:: 4922:@ 4911:( 4859:) 4856:✎ 4850:☎ 4847:( 4822:( 4765:( 4749:( 4713:| 4704:/ 4682:( 4653:( 4587:( 4492:( 4478:( 4442:( 4373:( 4358:( 4344:( 4328:( 4299:( 4258:( 4203:( 4183:( 4168:( 4153:( 4126:( 4111:( 4088:( 4073:( 4058:( 4014:( 3986:( 3968:( 3949:( 3919:( 3905:( 3891:( 3877:( 3862:( 3839:( 3824:( 3809:( 3788:( 3764:( 3735:( 3706:( 3692:( 3634:( 3612:( 3593:( 3571:( 3557:( 3541:( 3507:( 3493:( 3478:( 3464:( 3449:( 3434:( 3385:( 3343:( 3323:( 3285:( 3259:( 3244:( 3228:( 3213:( 3198:( 3178:( 3153:( 3088:( 3074:( 3060:( 3046:( 3031:( 3021:: 3017:@ 2988:( 2957:( 2921:( 2906:: 2902:@ 2849:( 2834:( 2811:( 2804:: 2800:@ 2760:( 2736:( 2702:( 2687:( 2672:( 2657:( 2639:( 2625:( 2606:( 2589:( 2571:( 2557:( 2551:: 2547:@ 2536:( 2521:( 2511:: 2499:@ 2465:( 2451:( 2436:( 2418:( 2404:( 2390:( 2375:( 2357:( 2343:( 2318:( 2266:( 2248:( 2234:( 2220:( 2205:( 2173:( 2129:( 2061:( 2046:( 2029:( 2006:( 1986:( 1959:( 1944:( 1929:( 1914:( 1896:( 1873:( 1853:( 1824:( 1810:( 1795:( 1778:( 1763:( 1744:( 1715:( 1696:( 1692:- 1680:( 1657:( 1653:- 1638:( 1622:( 1596:( 1579:( 1569:( 1497:( 1472:( 1458:( 1443:( 1419:( 1401:( 1377:( 1363:( 1348:( 1291:( 1276:( 1235:( 1221:( 1206:( 1192:( 1170:( 1156:( 1137:( 1112:( 1084:( 1029:( 1013:聖 1010:( 1001:· 996:( 978:( 964:( 948:聖 945:( 912:( 898:( 884:( 855:聖 852:( 833:( 805:聖 802:( 787:: 783:@ 763:( 745:聖 742:( 726:( 710:( 686:聖 683:( 672:) 668:( 652:( 634:( 613:聖 610:( 589:( 571:聖 568:( 561:: 557:@ 545:( 507:聖 504:( 489:U 487:C 464:( 440:( 421:( 371:? 326:聖 323:( 279:( 262:聖 259:( 208:( 178:聖 175:( 139:: 135:@ 120:聖 117:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index