Talk:Megalodon - Knowledge

3709:

wording and to the genus in the taxobox to specifically clarify this consensus so I am not sure why you changed it back, it gives a disingenuous impression to the reader. It is also inconsistent with the rest of the article, in the naming section it reads: "Megalodon was previously considered to be a member of the family Lamnidae, but it is now considered to be a member of the family Otodontidae, genus Carcharocles". So why only change the introduction? Again, I feel that this edit goes too far to the point of false balance and a misleading impression to the reader. As a point on the genus classification, genera are ultimately arbitrary as the sheer abundance of shark teeth mean that continuity between species of shark can be established. There are many chronospecies of megalodon that have existed since the palaeogene, and don't really effect the familial classification. My original edit might have been a bit too technical and clunky for an introduction, so I am not necessarily bothered by it simply being changed, but that the meaning is changed

3802:

for the most part. However the shear abundance of shark teeth means that continuity between species can be established over staggeringly long periods of time, where the form might change substantially. Which is unusual for vertebrates, but much more common for something like forams. In the fossil record normally eg dinosaurs, species are treated almost as if having spontaneously arisen and then gone extinct due to the incredibly poor resolution of the terrestrial fossil record. This why the problem is intractable, because it is a fundamental problem with the genus/species concept itself. I would personally stick with Charcharocles because this is the genus that the literature uses.

1997:

majority of readers also won't get it. In this context does "own weight in water" mean an amount of water weighing as much as the shark independent of immersion medium, or an amount of water weighing as much as the apparent weight of the shark when immersed in water? I expect the latter, but then some indication of the apparent weight is needed, as for a neutrally buoyant shark this would be zero. If the former, that is a huge mass of water, and the reason escapes me. Axial swimming is not explained in the article and does not appear to be explained anywhere else on Knowledge. A footnote may be useful. · · ·

2052:, and found a resource which explains the differences between body forms optimised for acceleration, maneuverability and sustained high speed. I think Kent is trying to say that the sand tiger is optimised for acceleration and possibly maneuverability, but is an inefficient form for sustained high cruising speeds, which tends to be represented by less flexible bodies and high aspect ratio caudal fins, and preferably near neutral buoyancy to minimise induced drag. I am going to look for a suitable wikilink, but may have to resort to a redlink. · · · 1111:

doubt cite) is that the average reader will be able to comprehend what the news article is saying. Also the journals they cite don't really have any free pdf's or anything, so they're not very accessible. If they do I've tried to replace them as best I can (but there's always a chance I missed a couple). theworldslargestsharksjaw.com is written by the Bertucci family (which is what is being discussed in the text). elasmo-research.com is backed by ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research, and all the writers are biologists, so it checks out for me

705: 684: 6507:"In this model, the great white shark is more closely related to the shark Isurus hastalis than to megalodon, as evidenced by more similar dentition in those two sharks; megalodon teeth have much finer serrations than great white shark teeth. In this model, the great white shark is more closely related to the mako shark (Isurus spp.), with a common ancestor around 4 mya." Is that one model? If so, it seems like a lot of repetition in the phrasing. If it's two models, then the difference between them should be made more clear. 3741:", but then again the taxobox uses Otodontidae, so I'm torn here. But in any case, fair point, there aren't that many that use that anymore, so I suppose it's kinda safe to say consensus's been reached; but in the rest of the article, should it take sides or should it not be changed from how it is right now? I'm not really sure there's a source that specifically says consensus has been reached, moreover they're just saying how it is in their opinion in an individual journal article or book or whatever 3043:"Scrutiny of the partially preserved vertebral megalodon specimen from Belgium revealed that it had a higher vertebral count than specimens of any known shark, possibly over 200 centra. Only the great white approached it." Can these two sentences be merged somehow? (maybe "Scrutiny of the partially preserved vertebral megalodon specimen from Belgium revealed that it had a higher vertebral count than specimens of any known shark, with the great white shark's equaling it, with possibly over 200 centra.) 478: 3705:"The taxonomic assignment of C. megalodon had been debated for nearly a century, but has recently reached consensus. In the past the two major interpretations were Carcharodon megalodon (under family Lamnidae) or Carcharocles megalodon (under the family Otodontidae). However recently, consensus has been reached that the latter view is correct and that megalodon is of the family Otodontidae deriving from sharks of the genus Otodus, and thus should be placed under the genus Carcharocles" 610: 3778:

all), typically doing a paper tangential to the topic (eg biometrics, population statistics etc). and cites older research, these articles are often given as a counter argument in Knowledge discussions of there still being a debate on taxonomy, where in actual fact they have just blindly followed the taxonomy of the older literature, and don't really have an opinion per se. In these cases I think that references like this should be taken with a grain of salt.

816: 3765:

bite force being used as a reference. The fact that the paper does not mention the discussion of taxonomy of megalodon at all is quite telling, and the reference they cite is a 1996 paper which solely mentions the charcharodon name. Had they discussed the taxonomy at all and said something like "we disagree and treat it as charcharodon megalodon for xyz reasons", it would be worthy of merit, and thus the debate could still be considered active in that case.

795: 241: 421: 3638:"In the past, the two major interpretations were Carcharodon megalodon (under the family Lamnidae) or Carcharocles megalodon (under the family Otodontidae)." This is very vaguely worded. Interpretation of what? What kind of interpretation? And what is "in the past"? You could say there has been a historical debate about its generic classification, and that one possibility is now in favour, but the current wording is just too weak. 469: 529: 511: 904: 715: 600: 579: 274: 1054: 211: 6510:"Megalodon was previously considered to be a member of the family Lamnidae, ..." This appears at the beginning of a paragraph that talks about the current preferred classification. It would seem to make more sense to mention this when the older model is discussed, both to consolidate the description of the older model and to make this paragraph more immediately about the current model. 2313:. Is it "a trend for specimens to be larger in the southern hemisphere than the northern", or just "a trend for specimens to be larger"? In effect I am asking whether the trend for larger in SH vs NH is exaggerated in the Pacific in relation to the Atlantic, or whether the trend for larger mean lengths in the Pacific than the Atlantic is greater than the hemispheric variation. · · · 5147:"Sharks generally are opportunistic feeders, but scientists propose that megalodon was largely a formidable predator." You could explain why "opportunistic feeder" is in contrast to "formidable predator". Especially since you later say about megalodon "Being an opportunist, it would have also gone after smaller fish", which sems like a contradiction. 4961:"crutiny of the partially preserved vertebral megalodon specimen from Belgium revealed that it had a higher vertebral count than specimens of any known shark, possibly over 200 centra; only the great white approached it." Why not moved this to after tyou mention the fossils form Belgium, instead of after mentioning fossils from Denmark? 6504:"The great white shark was previously considered to be a close relative to megalodon, and the two were placed in the same genus, due to dental similarity ..." The aside about genus could be omitted since it was discussed in the section immediately previous. This would again have the effect of creating a simpler sentence. 2561: 5488:"Their dietary preferences display an ontogenetic shift::65 Young megalodon commonly preyed on fish, giant sea turtles, dugongs,:129 and small cetaceans; mature megalodon moved to off-shore areas and consumed large cetaceans.:74–75" This is almost word for word already explained in the Prey relationships section. 3565:, where the artist has uploaded it (and almost all the images on that blog) himself. In fact, he uploaded images for Knowledge use long before he started his own website, and frequently asked for critique at the dinosaur art review page, so there is no copyright issue here (dual licenses are also fine). 6477:

I've had this on my watchlist for weeks, so about time I reviewed it. As usual with my reviews on science articles, I am coming from the perspective of a non-expert layperson who likes to read about ancient animals. I've only read part of the article so far. My initial concerns are about the Taxonomy

3764:

Hi, thanks for the response, sorry if the previous post came off as rude or cranky. Thanks for the reference, I think I have had similar discussions in the past. For this paper, it is not focused on Megalodon at all, instead as a discussion on the bite force of a living shark species, with Megalodons

3535:

I agree there is an image overload, but that's mainly because we have way too many repetitive images of teeth (3) and jaws (5). There is only a single restoration of the animal, far from the description/anatomy section where such are usually placed, yet there is still room there (even if you keep the

2134:

in Oxford and Merriam-Webster dictionaries, which both say "small, deep-set eyes", quite the opposite of "popping out". I think we can reasonably assume that the authors meant small, deep-set eyes, and as the meaning is clearly not obvious, suggest that the article is changed to clarify. There is no

5890:

Hmm, the "about the author" link says: "I am not a professional in Geology or Paleontology... I am just a very interested amateur..." etc, so I wonder. When the site is assembled by an enthusiastic amateur, how can we be sure that it meets the required standards of reliability? For example, is

3708:

No research for the past five or more years has suggested that Megalodon is part of Lamnidae,the latest papers I can see that suggest this are from the mid 2000's. The wording change seems to imply that there is still an active debate about the taxonomy, when there is not. I made this change to the

3801:

The genus and species concept works really well in in the modern world where you are only looking at a snapshot of time where every species is discrete. It also usually works really well in the fossil record as fossils usually only give a brief window into the past where is therefore also discrete

3777:

I think in future when we have disputes like this, only the opinions of current specialists should be considered. A lot of the time what happens is that someone who is not versed in the taxonomic debate does not read the literature carefully (Not that I blame them for this, publish or perish after

3370:

Alternative combinations (of genus and species names, such as Carcharodon megalodon) should also be listed in the taxobox synonyms. It is also better to spell out the genus names in the presently listed synonyms, otherwise we won't know what genus each invalid species was assigned to. All synonyms

2129:

I accept that the source said "pig-eyed". I checked, and it is there, but I could not access adjacent text to see what meaning they intended. Nevertheless, I do not get a clear understanding from the expression as used in the article, and question its usefulness as a description on that account. I

1110:

That would be a lot of refs to change considering all the fossilwork refs are just for the table. "Monster Shark" is by NatGeo so I'd say it's pretty reliable, and there's nothing wrong with citing news articles. The biggest difference between news articles and peer-reviewed studies (that they no

3773:

However the people who were writing the paper appear to be zoologists and not shark paleontologists. I don't think that they dug particularly deep on the topic, simply due to lack of relevance to the paper, and therefore simply just took the bite force data from the 1996 paper and the genus name

1996:

The paragraph is still incomprehensible to me, and is not linked to anything that explains it. I am not a specialist on animal swimming, but I am educated in basic hydrodynamics and have probably a better than average layman's knowledge of marine biology, so if I don't get it, I suspect that the

6534:

I ordered everything in order of importance, so what's important about the Agassiz thing is that it was officially described in 1843, and then it shoots off to less important (though still notable) information about some inconsistencies with the dating. I think I fixed that second paragraph in

4670:

Wouldn't they know where to look for it in the "estimations" section? In any case, the manual of style advises against short, single paragraph sections: "Very short or very long sections and subsections in an article look cluttered and inhibit the flow of the prose. Short paragraphs and single

1908:

This section seems excessively tentative. It suggests that the shark resembled at least four rather different extant species. It may be that there are different opinions as to which shark it most closely resembles, in which case this should be specifically mentioned, if possible mentioning the

5909:

which starts out with, "We’re pleased to announce this one is with avocational paleontologist and expert fossil-finder, Jason Kowinsky. Jayson is the creator of the popular website FossilGuy.com and a long-time contributor to paleontological discoveries and education," so it checks out for me

3941:

The "fossils" section seems like a hodgepodge of text that belongs in other sections. Some of it is about evolution, some is descriptive, some is about extinction date. I think this should be spread out to more appropriate sections. Especially the last two paragraphs, which are entirely about

1091:

Half of the citations seem to be Fossilworks.com. Wouldn't it be better to directly use the sources the website cites? Or at least condense it somehow. "Monster Shark" also doesn't seem to be a reliable source, most of such TV shows are overly exaggerated. "theworldslargestsharksjaw.com." and

5566:"The shark has made appearances in several works of fiction, such as the Discovery Channel's Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives." I don't think you need to arbitrarily name one of many media appearances in the intro. Also, it is way too early in the lead, should be at the bottom, if anywhere. 3294:

That's on the even vaguer end... "Modern era" could mean anything (all research is also modern?), and "sightings" is too uncritical, as it implies it has actually been seen. "Fiction and cryptozoology" is probably the most fitting after all, but if you want to be more inclusive, "cultural

1071:

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm trying to get it to FA status, but this article attained GA status back in 2008 (meaning I didn't write a bulk of it). I'm worried about referencing issues mainly because of that, I need to make sure that the text says what the refs say

5925:

I don't doubt that Mr Kowinsky is knowledgeable – this is, after all, his hobby. That doesn't alter the fact that this site is the work of an amateur, and thus in my view fails the required FA standards of quality and reliability, but I'll leave the coordinators to make a judgement here.

3798:, one branch of Otodus becomes much larger in size and is then called Charcharocles, including several predecessor species like C. chubutensis etc, this then leads to Megalodon. As you can see, there are multiple genera covering a continuous sequence over 70 million years or more. 1520:

I replaced the book image, but I'm not too sure what to do with the map. It says you can use a modified version of the map, and the one on here is covered in dots, so that seems to check out. It says it can only be used as a resource, just not point-blank copy/pasted onto a page

6167:(77 now) Why not simply put the page numbers that verify the information given in the text? Chapter headings are not an acceptable alternative in paginated sources. The specified chapter "Final report" is not available in the Google extract, so the link is presently valueless. 1186:

Some other things, you should explain in the caption of the size comparison why Megalodon is shown twice. Also, it may be good to reverse the alignment of the Livyatan skull image and the megalodon chasing whales, since it is preferred that subjects of images face the text.

5410:"They probably also targeted the flipper in order to immobilize the whale before killing it" and "This suggests that megalodon would immobilize a large whale by ripping apart or biting off its locomotive structures before killing and feeding on it" repetitive. 4987:"a mature male, though relative and proportional changes in the skeletal features of megalodon are ontogenetic in nature, in comparison to those of the great white, as they also occur in great white sharks while growing." I'm not sure what you're saying here. 3231:"In fiction" Still seems a way too specific and inadequate title for something that includes info about wrong dating of teeth. This has nothing to do with fiction, and instead of making a new section, it would be better to just make the title more inclusive. 826: 3495:

NobuTamura/Arthur Weasley is a pretty prolific paleoartist on Knowledge (or at least was), he has done many images in different styles, from pencil to 3D, so there is no question it's his own. Much of his underwater work has the same style, see for example

3984:"Relationship between megalodon and the great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias)" This caption seems misleading, since the cladogram shows the relation with many sharks, not just with the white shark. So it should rather be "including the white shark". 3516:

I can find all those pictures on the website specified in the source, but I can’t find Megalodon on the website specified in the source. Also the article’s borderlining on picture overload and there’s already a pretty realistic Megalodon reconstruction

2403:

Checked: sample of 10 refs chosen from accessible websites. Some when checking specific content, some arbitrarily selected for no special reason. These checks are for validity only, i.e. the content is supported by the source. No comment on formatting.

2049: 6565:

Day 10: you've either run out of comments to give (which is fine), have chosen not to continue with the review (which is also fine), have gotten too busy to go on (which is alright), or you forgot to watch the page. Just let me know which one

5358:"The shark probably also had a tendency for cannibalism, much like contemporary sharks." You mention two different species in the preceding sentence, so specify megalodon instead of "the shark". This also avoids repetition of the word "shark". 3712:

Thus I am editing this section to draw comment, If you disagree then please respond to this comment, I am happy for my section to be changed as long as it accurately reflects that there is consensus in the Megalodon family classification.

2564:] may help to distinguish between the sub-classes (anguilliform, carangiform and thunniform) of axial swimming of the sharks considered. I am not sure, but think the distinction you need to make is between carangiform and thunniform modes. 5095:"The overall modal length has been estimated at 10.5 meters (34 ft), with the length distribution skewed towards larger individuals, suggesting an ecological or competitive advantage for larger body size." Why is this under range/habitat? 2254:

The section in italics is not clear. Do the 10.9 and 9.5 meters refer to mean lengths in the Pacific and Atlantic (both hemispheres) repectively, or to mean lengths in the southern hemisphere and northern hemisphere in one of these

3479:

I checked the source and it doesn't actually have a picture of megalodon in it (or at least not one labelled "megalodon"), and it doesn't really have the same style as all the other pictures on the sight which makes me question it

6811: 5020:

it's said in the caption what it is, and it's the only image in the section, and the only other thing in that section beyond that sentence is the table, and there's {{clear}} so it doesn't bleed into any other sections

6152:

Removed, added, but for page refs: it seems as if this is referencing the entire work (unlike ref #70)? Unless the chapter "Megalodon: The Fisherman's Nightmare" should be cited to support the text more explicitly. –

1092:"elasmo-research.com." also seems like dubious sources, and that is just at a glance. In general, most of such sources should be replaced with academic, peer-reviewed sources, not pop-science articles and TV-shows. 2560:"Axial swimmers" applies to both sand tigers and great whites, and does not distinguish between the two. It basically means they swim by flexing the body sideways, as opposed to flapping or undulating paired fins. 3702:"There has been some debate regarding the taxonomy of megalodon: some researchers argue that it is of the family Lamnidae, while others argue that it belongs to the family Otodontidae" as compared to the original 482: 3536:

basking shark). It's up to you, but I think the balance could certainly be improved, and it's kind of inappropriate that the reader has to get that far down the article to get an idea how the animal looked like.

6776: 6652:

Just a driveby really, and I don't wish to spoil the party, but there are 5 images showing the complete wide-open jaws of the species. They are remarkable, but perhaps this is slightly too many, too similar?

153: 4361:

The end of the Phylogeny indicates the species belongs in Otodus, but this is inconsistent with the rest of the article. What is the actual, current consensus, and when has it been established, and by who?

2557:"Pig eyed" still does not add value for me, as it must be followed by an explanation to clarify, which would be just as effective without the original epithet. I will not oppose on this point, just saying. 2359:. First paragraph of the section states probably an apex predator, so maybe "Also being an opportunist...". In same sentence, "small and fish" makes no sense, but not sure what is intended. "Smaller fish"? 2262:

11.6 and 9.6 metres mean length for the southern and northern hemispheres respectively; and 10.9 and 9.5 metres for the Pacific and Atlantic oceans respectively. The semicolon is there to separate the two

6801: 4591:

You mention informal names, yet overlook the fact that "megalodon" is itself an informal version of the specific name. Perhaps this could be stated, if the sources allow it. It is kind of similar to how

6816: 4648:

Not sure why "Largest known specimens" needs to be a separate section. Both examples are of teeth, so the text would seem to fit better in the section about teeth, which already contains measurements.

6771: 6048:(now 40): Being the brother of an expert does not of itself confer expertise – this is a tribute site. It's also unnecessary to include it, as the point in the text is covered by another reference. 6450:

Okay I added a paragraph to the Teeth and bite force section going over all the points you raised. It does seem kinda weird how the labial side's not convex but no one seems to be questioning it

1972:

However, since sand tiger sharks are displacement swimmers, and use drag to propel themselves; they are required to move around three or four times their own weight in water on each tail stroke.

631:-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 6836: 3781:

Pretty much every paper that discusses megalodon taxonomy over the past 5 years or more agrees with the Otodontidae classification, so again I think we can consider this case fairly settled.

6821: 6400:

How are the teeth oriented? Is the concave side facing to the inside or outside? I think this is very important, because it is counter-intuitive: I saw museum mounts that got this wrong. --

3023:

it also says the subject should be facing the text, so like the Megalodon painting shows the Megalodon facing the left so the picture should be on the right side so that it faces the text

1342:

This article is about a very very large shark that went extinct a really really long time ago. It also got to GA a really very long time ago in 2008, and now I'm here to see it through FA

3120:

Seems the image layout could still be improved. In the Taxonomy section, the white shark or tooth image could maybe be moved down, so they don't cluster above, both next to the cladogram.

2249:

Fossil remains show a trend for specimens to be larger on average in the southern hemisphere than in the northern, with mean lengths of 11.6 and 9.6 meters (38 and 31 ft), respectively;

392: 255: 6482:

The history of Agassiz's naming is inverted, describing his 1843 work, then an 1837 attribution to him, then 1835 articles. Why not describe the history in forward chronological order?

4435:

it’s less relevant. What’s most important is its relationship to the great white shark (classification at the family level), the rest of the paragraphs talk about its genus placement

4510:" The fact that these claims are in the same sentence makes it seem that the pig eyes appearance is also in contrast to the great shark. If not, it could be changed, maybe the order. 2048:

I read the source. It also fails to explain the meaning of axial swimming and the requirement to displace a large mass of water by drag adequately. I also did a little research into

2772:

it starts off every episode by popping up on the screen "location - x sea," "average temperature - x degrees," and "hazard - ..." and in this episode it said "hazard - Megalodon"

6786: 6621:

Since there is plenty of feedback from other editors and I continue to have other distractions, I'll stop where I was and the coordinator can treat my comments as "drive by". --

5384:"Fossil remains of some small cetaceans, for example cetotheres, suggest that they were rammed with great force from below before being killed and eaten." How is this evidenced? 3168:

It is slightly repetitive, so I'd just remove it or put it in the fiction section as decoration or something, but it's also a shame to remove it, so maybe just leave it as is.

1473:

File:Megbook.jpg and File:Earthmap1000x500compac.jpg should be checked by someone more expert. I am satisfied with the others. These two are probably OK too but I am not sure.

3794:

from the cretaceous period. After the K-Pg extinction, the genus split into branches. for most of the Palaeogene, the branch ancestral to megalodon is treated as the genus

4622:"were based on a weaker evaluation of the dental homology between megalodon and the great white shark" I have no idea what this means. What is a "weaker evaluation" here? 202: 280: 3265:

Maybe fiction and cryptozoology? It may also be an idea to make the title even more generic, if we want to include for example non-fictional media appearances or such.

1129:, which links to all those pages anyway. As for the documentary, I'm pretty sure it won't fly at FAC, so it's probably a good idea to find replacements for it before. 1596:

All images have alt text. I think some could be improved. I will get back to this for details or make the suggested changes myself if you are happy with that. · · ·

6831: 5266:"Being an opportunist, it would have also gone after smaller fish and other sharks" and "megalodon also would have been piscivorous" this means the same, redundant. 2290:

Exactly what it sounds like? I use that every day to mean "a quantity more than..." (and on occasion "more like..." depending on the context, but you get the idea)

656: 147: 666: 6876: 1974:

On the face of it, this does not make sense. Explain or link "displacement swimmer", explain how drag can propel anything, as it seems a contradiction in terms.

5940:

If a coordinator does find it unreliable, it's a secondary ref so I can easily just remove it and there's still gonna be another ref around citing the text

6841: 3856:"Swiss naturalist Louis Agassiz gave the shark its" I would rather say "this shark", when I read it first i thought you meant sharks in general as a taxon. 544: 516: 3826:

The "etymology" section seems to be too specifically named compared with the content. Perhaps change to "naming", as it is not simply concerned with the

1283: 79: 1228:"? If not, it should be removed, as the term is frowned upon by scientists today. If it is only used in some pop-science article, it should be removed. 5013:

Maybe the sentence under Locations of fossils could say "shown in the map below or some such, to make it clear that the text is connected to the image.

4428:"in the 1980s, megalodon was assigned to Carcharocles." and "Before this, in 1960, the genus Procarcharodon was", why is it not in chronological order? 4331:"concluded that it is a paraphyly." The term needs to be explained, and the sentence is also wrongly worded. A taxon can be paraphyletic, it cannot be 6796: 4562:"Due to fragmentary remains" and "Due to the lack of well-preserved fossil megalodon skeletons" seems repetitive, and could be consolidated into one. 2519:

said he'll be reviewing prose to make sure sure all the language's not too sciencey and weird, so I might do some minor copyedits should he start up

1773:

I am not familiar with the expression, is it standard or common usage in paleontology? I think it may be a bit obscure for the average reader. · · ·

6851: 6826: 6806: 4069:

You should be consistent in whether you give scientific names after common names or not. Now you mention modern shark species without and some with.

983: 767: 632: 373: 882: 777: 2493:

A lot has happened to the article since I last read through it carefully. Please ping me when the activity has subsided for a final check. · · ·

6535:

Taxonomy by merging it with the third, and then merging the fourth with the third. The most important thing about it is its classification into

5625:"Regarded as one of the largest and most powerful predators in vertebrate history," Only stated in the intro, which should not have unique info. 6866: 5651:"looked like a stockier version" Likewise only referred to as stocky in the intro, but you also fail to mention the other possible appearances. 872: 6781: 6707: 1273: 85: 6513:

The rest of the many different classification models are discussed in what seems like a hodgepodge order -- at least it isn't chronological.

6871: 6856: 6766: 6718: 4046:

I feel like some people'd get confused why it suddenly changes from "model" to "scheme" (as if there's a difference) then back to "model"

5891:

there any evidence that the site's content is mentored by, has been approved by or recommended by universities or other learned bodies?

5677:

You could mention in the intro that it is mainly/only known from teeth and vertebrae, which is the reason for the various size estimates.

5066:"(although the megatooth lineage in general is thought to display a trend of increasing size over time)" What is the "megatooth lineage"? 2653:

However this result appears to be an error within the matrix and the average position for this individual is actually 19.6 meters (64 ft)

4780:"for its maximum confirmed size and the conservative minimum and maximum body mass of megalodon" Maybe these sizes could be listed here. 3472:

It doesn't seem like a white shark-like appearance has been ruled out, but it's explicitly mentioned as a possibility under description.

957: 623: 584: 4895:"The jaws would have given it a "pig-eyed" profile." Not sure what the jaws have to do with the eyes, and isn't this repetition anyway? 4165:

article says 16 mya considering I can't find anyone else who says that except for the one source they both cite (which I can't access)

2940:

I'm gonna be gone over the weekend to a place where wifi is a foreign concept, so I'll answer any more comments on Monday (or Tuesday)

1026: 742: 6846: 848: 44: 5790:

when the page number isn’t specified in the refs, I just put {{rp}} directly after each mention of the ref to specify page numbers

6861: 6791: 6033:

it’s written by Joseph Bertucci, brother of Vito Bertucci, and the discussion on the Bertucci reconstruction is what it’s citing

5989:(It's 32 now) That may be your view, but the chapter is paginated and there is no reason at all for not providing the page refs. 4454:"One idea on how megalodon appeared" Seems ambiduous, maybe say "one interpretation of megalodon's physical appearances is that". 3012: 4128:

You mention various geological ages without links or dates, but this will mean nothing to many readers, so you should add both.

2079:

It is clearer to me. If you are satisfied that that is the intended meaning of the source I am happy with it. OK for me. · · ·

1555: 1491: 1022: 922: 99: 30: 4210:"to classify the shark C. auriculatus into". Sounds weird, maybe say "was established to contain C. auriculatus" or some such. 5783:

Ref 12: There are 21 citations to a page range 1–159. How is someone to check any of these, short of scouring the whole book?

2041:

The source specifies own mass, which is unambiguous. Weight in water is ambiguous as it can mean apparent weight. Own weight

914: 104: 20: 5495:

the Prey relationships section just says young megalodon ate more fish, but it goes more in-depth what mature megalodon eat

3146:

Under "Teeth and bite force", the Baltimore jaw image seems a bit redundant and crammed-in, could be moved somewhere else.

1730:

First paragraph suggested that Megalodon:The Monster Shark Lives is a documentary. I changed it. No action required · · ·

1007: 74: 4161:

considering great whites evolved 6.5 million years ago (at the very earliest), I removed it. I'm not really sure why the

3787:

The genus level taxonomy for Megalodon is a complete nightmare. This is for a number of reasons, I will explain briefly.

5514:" from Ancient Greek: μέγας (megas) "big, mighty" and ὀδoύς (odoús) "tooth"" All this detail should not be in the intro. 3689:

Hello, I am am the author of this section that was changed, I am quite unhappy with this change for a number of reasons.

1931:

Then perhaps the section should lead with a mention that opinions differ, and possibly mention who holds which opinion.

1451:

File:Meg bitten cetacean vertebra.jpg - not found at source url, page may have changed. OTRS ticket on file, assuming OK

839: 800: 737: 728: 689: 491: 168: 5905:

Well on that About the Author page it also lists him doing something with the Paleontological Society, it says he did

4536:

The section "Anatomy" is incorrectly named; size and external shape are also anatomy. Maybe you mean internal anatomy.

446: 250: 135: 65: 4865:"this means that most fossil specimens are poorly preserved" In a section about anatomy, that's not really what this 2896:

In prey relations, the text is being sandwiched between the two images, so if that could be fixed, it would be great.

2483:

Looks OK on a sample check. (see above) I don't do ref formatting reviews, but have not noticed any obvious problems.

1537: 4154:"and predate the transitional Pliocene fossils." What transitional fossils? You have not introduced what these are. 3321:

The external links and videos should be cleaned up; some of the links don't work, and some are just redundant junk.

2871:

Using a dab like that is a bad idea (it's just going to draw people trying to fix it), so I resolved by creating a

999: 210: 185: 4655:

so people can find information quickly. Most likely people’re gonna be reading this article to see how big it got

1916:

there’re three different ideas as to what it really looked like, so they’re split into three different paragraphs

6405: 450: 4754:"hough a reconstruction at USNM approximate" Since you've aleady mentioned the museum, you could say "the USNM". 221: 6612: 6572: 6549: 6456: 6441: 6424: 6371: 6356: 6305: 6261: 6205: 6143: 6098: 6068: 6039: 6009: 5980: 5946: 5916: 5881: 5855: 5825: 5805:(This is now ref 14) I understand the system now you've explained it, but I wonder if the general reader will. 5796: 5754: 5690: 5664: 5638: 5608: 5579: 5553: 5527: 5501: 5475: 5449: 5423: 5397: 5371: 5331: 5305: 5279: 5253: 5215: 5186: 5160: 5134: 5108: 5082: 5053: 5027: 5000: 4974: 4948: 4908: 4882: 4852: 4822: 4793: 4767: 4741: 4715: 4661: 4635: 4609: 4578: 4549: 4523: 4493: 4467: 4441: 4415: 4389: 4348: 4302: 4275: 4249: 4223: 4197: 4171: 4141: 4111: 4082: 4052: 4023: 3997: 3955: 3928: 3898: 3869: 3843: 3747: 3680: 3651: 3625: 3585: 3523: 3486: 3432: 3384: 3357: 3285: 3244: 3218: 3188: 3159: 3133: 3091: 3074: 3057: 3029: 2997: 2966: 2947: 2929: 2910: 2872: 2862: 2778: 2731: 2672: 2625: 2577: 2525: 2372: 2296: 2269: 2214: 2144: 2120: 2070: 2032: 2017: 1987: 1940: 1922: 1874: 1808: 1764: 1689: 1563: 1527: 1407: 1348: 1330: 1252: 1211: 1167: 1152: 1117: 1081: 468: 316: 240: 198: 194: 190: 4091:

No, I mean some times you mention a species and give its scientific name afterwards, but sometimes you don't.

2432:

Renz, Mark (2002), partly checked, pages not fully accessible, samples checked were good. no problem detected.

4735:

intermediate tooth which is what the text before it was talking about, but I removed it since it's redundant

2486:

media. See above: reasonable variety of images, appropriate for purpose, licensing issues appear to be fixed.

6658: 5436:"preferred nursery sites" You need to explain what a nursery site even is before going into detail about it. 4262:

In the phylogeny section, you are inconsistent in whether you mention authors and dates for theories or not.

3533: 2453:

well-written: Could use some more copyediting. I will do what I can, but don't claim to be very good at it.

961: 951: 918: 109: 2325:

Fixed it myself after referring to source. No further action required if you are OK with the change. · · ·

1698:

Fair comment. If the accepted procedure is to list only species synonyms in the infobox, no problem. · · ·

704: 683: 129: 6685: 6336: 6233: 6172: 6053: 5994: 5931: 5896: 5810: 5768: 3816: 3721: 3205:

The vertebra under "Prey relationships" could be right aligned so it doesn't cluster with the skull photo.

5842:

Ref 17: Same problem – this time 31 citations without page references, in a book with at least 517 pages.

2456:

comprehensibility to the layperson reasonable for the topic. Some clarification needed as detailed above.

1608:

I have made some alt text copyedits, and plan to do more. Feel free to revert if you disagree with them.

1466:

File:Orca pod southern residents.jpg - looks OK, checked source and license corresponds with commons tag.

273: 5121:"formidable predator", "a formidable feeding apparatus", seems repetitive when used in close succession. 4010:" In this model, the great white shark", and "In this model, the great white shark is", very repetitive. 3554: 3257: 2830: 2811: 2799: 2744: 2714: 2685: 2638: 2590: 2538: 2497: 2385: 2329: 2317: 2282: 2227: 2157: 2083: 2056: 2001: 1953: 1887: 1821: 1777: 1734: 1714: 1702: 1643: 1631: 1615: 1600: 1576: 1512: 1481: 1420: 947: 928: 497: 260: 1494:. The book cover currently has no fair-use rationale for this page and can't be used here without one. 125: 6401: 4402:

You mention various subgenera, like Otodus (Megaselachus) megalodon, so this term could be mentioned.

2429:

Ferretti, Francesco; Boris Worm; Gregory L. Britten; Michael R. Heithaus; Heike K. Lotze1 (2010) - OK

1545: 1499: 6493:." This could be a more straightforward sentence, such as, "Agassiz assigned megalodon to the genus 2357:

Being an opportunist, it would have gone after small and fish and other sharks given the opportunity

1454:

File:Earthmap1000x500compac.jpg - source archived, I don't know how to check licensing for this one.

6675: 6608: 6568: 6545: 6452: 6437: 6420: 6367: 6352: 6319: 6301: 6275: 6257: 6219: 6201: 6158: 6139: 6116: 6094: 6064: 6035: 6005: 5976: 5942: 5912: 5877: 5851: 5821: 5792: 5750: 5686: 5660: 5634: 5604: 5575: 5549: 5523: 5497: 5471: 5445: 5419: 5393: 5367: 5327: 5301: 5275: 5249: 5211: 5182: 5156: 5130: 5104: 5078: 5049: 5023: 4996: 4970: 4944: 4904: 4878: 4848: 4818: 4789: 4763: 4737: 4711: 4657: 4631: 4605: 4574: 4545: 4519: 4489: 4463: 4437: 4411: 4385: 4344: 4298: 4271: 4245: 4219: 4193: 4167: 4137: 4107: 4078: 4048: 4019: 3993: 3951: 3924: 3894: 3865: 3839: 3743: 3676: 3647: 3621: 3581: 3519: 3482: 3428: 3380: 3353: 3281: 3240: 3214: 3184: 3155: 3129: 3087: 3070: 3053: 3025: 2993: 2962: 2943: 2925: 2906: 2858: 2774: 2727: 2668: 2621: 2573: 2521: 2368: 2292: 2265: 2210: 2140: 2116: 2066: 2028: 2013: 1983: 1936: 1918: 1870: 1804: 1760: 1685: 1559: 1523: 1403: 1344: 1326: 1248: 1207: 1163: 1148: 1127: 1113: 1077: 615: 454: 161: 55: 847:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

6733: 6654: 5725: 5708: 5593: 5200: 4807: 4678: 4316: 4096: 4037: 3969: 3883: 3665: 3570: 3541: 3507: 3448: 3417: 3300: 3270: 3173: 3111: 2309:, and is what I would expect it to mean. What I asked was what concept in the sentence "more so" 1233: 1192: 1134: 1097: 354: 335: 226: 175: 70: 2470:

stable: Looks fine. A lot of constructive work over the last few months and no recent edit wars.

2435:

Siverson, Mikael; Johan Lindgren; Michael G. Newbrey; Peter Cederström; Todd D. Cook (2013) - OK

1448:

File:Giant white shark coprolite (Miocene; coastal waters of South Carolina, USA).jpg - looks OK

5318:

What is a "killer sperm whale? You need to link and give a scientific name at first occurrence.

4802:

Not for the white shark, whose size is specifically referred to here the only time, I believe.

3499: 6332: 6229: 6168: 6049: 5990: 5927: 5892: 5806: 5764: 4162: 3812: 3734: 3717: 2710:

This covers up to end of section 3. My concentration is flagging, so will finish later. · · ·

1394:

Source link doesn't appear to have original publication - when/where was this first published?

264: 51: 6581:

Apologies, I did let myself get distracted. Will take back up with more comments tomorrow. --

4921:"Chondrocranium" could be explained, also, the paragraph it appears in ends without citation. 2251:

and in the Pacific more so than the Atlantic 10.9 and 9.5 meters (36 and 31 ft) respectively.

1463:

File:Megalodon teeth.png - looks OK, checked source and license corresponds with commons tag.

6711: 6626: 6586: 6522: 6331:

Otherwise, sources look of appropriate quality and reliabiliuty. No spotchecks carried out.

6199:

Assuming it's been pushed over to ref no. 78, it has a location and the chapter's specified

5906: 3551: 3254: 2880: 2827: 2808: 2796: 2741: 2711: 2682: 2635: 2587: 2535: 2510: 2494: 2382: 2326: 2314: 2279: 2224: 2154: 2080: 2053: 1998: 1950: 1884: 1818: 1774: 1731: 1711: 1699: 1640: 1628: 1612: 1597: 1573: 1509: 1478: 1417: 1304: 429: 223: 1490:

The map appears to be pretty much identical to the source site, which is problematic given

420: 4236:"Before this, however, in 1960," Insert sentence overload, you could easily cut "however". 1860:

I switched it to "those four sharks" because I figure it'd be confusing saying "the genus

1541: 1495: 1474: 4480:

The Steno shark image takes a lot of vertical space, perhaps add the "upright" parameter.

2515:

Well the last edit was over ten days ago, so I think things are kinda settling down now.

6710:

has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see

6681: 4672: 2417:

Weinstock, J. A. (2014), Partly checked, some pages not accessible, no problem detected.

2183:

Megalodon is represented in the fossil record by teeth, vertebral centra, and coprolite.

815: 794: 6485:"The teeth of megalodon are morphologically similar to those of the great white shark ( 6394:

A bit more on the general shape might be helpful … They are concave on one side, right?

6315: 6271: 6215: 6154: 6112: 5573:

figured I'd put it in the paragraph where it talks about what people are doing with it

4565:

The article appears to be in US English, yet you have metres and kilometres throughout.

4032:

You could say "according to one scheme" or such one if the times, to avoid repetition.

2700:

Megalodon, like contemporaneous sharks, made use of nursery areas to house their young,

141: 3253:

How about "Fiction and misconceptions"? There have been no plausible sightings. · · ·

6760: 6729: 6693: 5721: 5704: 5589: 5196: 4803: 4674: 4312: 4286: 4092: 4033: 3965: 3879: 3661: 3566: 3537: 3503: 3444: 3413: 3296: 3266: 3169: 3107: 2026:"own weight in water" means in the most literal sense possible "own weight in water" 1296: 1229: 1188: 1130: 1093: 831: 2706:

is a bit of a stretch here. It suggests a more enclosed region than seems probable.

2464:

well-researched: Appears adequately cited, and those refs I have checked look good.

1225: 1061: 825: 628: 539: 535: 4508:

and it may have had a pig-eyed appearance, in that it had deep-set and small eyes.

3660:"Some argue" is listed as "weasel words", you could say "some researchers argue". 3069:

This is all I have to nitpick on. It is a really very well-written, solid article!

528: 510: 6497:

because its teeth are morphologically similar to those of the great white shark (

6489:), and on the basis of this observation, Agassiz assigned megalodon to the genus 6478:

section, which as currently written seems unnecessarily confusing. Specifically:

3942:

morphology, surely belongs under description/anatomy, which is very short anyway.

6725: 6622: 6597: 6582: 6560: 6518: 6026:

Ref 37: what makes theworldslargestsharksjaw.com a high quality reliable source?

3497: 3393:

Ah, there's a problem with listing genera separately from species here, though;

2876: 2516: 1442:

File:Megalodon jaws on display at the National Baltimore Aquarium.jpg - looks OK

1300: 720: 599: 578: 927:

Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 8 June 2022 by

5462:"Neonate megalodons" Not sure why such an uncommon word needs to be used here. 3791: 1126:

I think you could replace all those distracting links by simply using this one

821: 736:. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at 710: 605: 3501: 2807:

Fixed it myself. No more issues as far as I can see, moving to support · · ·

913:

to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include

6108: 5602:

It was notable enough to get its own little paragraph specifically about it

4593: 3609: 2185:

Only one coprolite? If so, "a coprolite". If more than one, use plural form.

1315: 992: 24: 6390:

I am wondering if you could include more information on the tooth anatomy:

5974:

chapter name is specified in this ref so the page numbers don’t have to be

445:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 4728:"but this tooth is still designated as intermediate." What does this mean? 4289:

are mentioned in that section, perhaps mention the word if the sources do.

6689: 6397:

How do the teeth differ in shape according to their location in the jaw?

5236:, it would have also gone after smaller fish and other sharks given the 1460:

File:VMNH megalodon.jpg - looks OK. source checked, OTRS ticket on file.

5868:

Refs 23 and 40: what makes fossilguy.com a high quality reliable source

3563: 3470: 3412:

itself. So what I meant is you should list full binomials as synonyms.

1909:

specific attributes that are hypothesized to match each of the species.

3790:

Megalodons ancestry can be directly traced to a genus of shark called

3612:, is there any published information about this? Could be interesting. 1369:

File:Megalodon shark jaws museum of natural history 068.jpg - looks OK

3795: 2467:

neutral: As far as I can tell. No reasons found to suspect otherwise.

1375:

File:Megalodon tooth with great white sharks teeth-3-2.jpg - looks OK

225: 5344:"In areas where their ranges seems to overlap" Should be past tense. 3863:

should I do that for every time is says "the shark" in the article?

1669:

spp? Phylogeny section appears to suggest that other synonyms exist.

1282:

Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in

6688:), and this is very good article. :) Great! Goodl luck with FAC. -- 6349:

I’ll try to fix the rest later, life got really busy really quickly

4928:

looks like I accidentally deleted that ref a few edits back, fixed.

4839:"and coprolite." I'm pretty sure it should be coprolites in plural. 732:, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to 5658:

fixed, and I think "stocky" and "robust" are effectively synonyms

844: 733: 6228:

It's actually 81 now, and the necessary details have been added.

2107:

What is a "pig-eyed appearance" intended to mean in this context?

6737: 6697: 6662: 6630: 6616: 6590: 6576: 6553: 6526: 6460: 6445: 6428: 6409: 6375: 6360: 6340: 6323: 6309: 6279: 6265: 6237: 6223: 6209: 6176: 6162: 6147: 6120: 6102: 6072: 6057: 6043: 6013: 5998: 5984: 5967:

Ref 29: as per 12 and 17 – 7 citations, no p. refs, book 389 pp.

5950: 5935: 5920: 5900: 5885: 5859: 5829: 5814: 5800: 5772: 5763:

Sorry, I mis-typed 7 for 2 – but ref 2 has since been replaced.

5758: 5729: 5712: 5703:

Seems only a couple of points and answers need to be addressed.

5694: 5668: 5642: 5612: 5597: 5583: 5557: 5540:

You capitalise as "Megalodon" a few places, which is inaccurate.

5531: 5505: 5479: 5453: 5427: 5401: 5375: 5335: 5309: 5283: 5257: 5219: 5204: 5190: 5164: 5138: 5112: 5086: 5057: 5031: 5004: 4978: 4952: 4912: 4886: 4856: 4826: 4811: 4797: 4771: 4745: 4719: 4682: 4665: 4639: 4613: 4582: 4553: 4527: 4506:"The jaws may have been blunter and wider than the great white, 4497: 4471: 4445: 4419: 4393: 4352: 4320: 4306: 4253: 4227: 4201: 4175: 4145: 4115: 4100: 4086: 4056: 4041: 4027: 4001: 3973: 3959: 3932: 3902: 3887: 3873: 3847: 3820: 3751: 3725: 3684: 3669: 3655: 3629: 3589: 3574: 3557: 3545: 3527: 3511: 3490: 3452: 3436: 3421: 3388: 3361: 3304: 3289: 3274: 3260: 3248: 3222: 3192: 3177: 3163: 3137: 3115: 3095: 3078: 3061: 3033: 3011:

We could have images aligned to the left wherever possible, per

3001: 2970: 2951: 2933: 2914: 2884: 2866: 2856:

that was one purpose,it just lists all the movies in the series

2833: 2814: 2802: 2782: 2747: 2735: 2717: 2688: 2676: 2641: 2629: 2593: 2581: 2541: 2529: 2500: 2388: 2376: 2332: 2320: 2300: 2285: 2273: 2230: 2218: 2160: 2148: 2124: 2086: 2074: 2059: 2036: 2021: 2004: 1991: 1956: 1944: 1926: 1890: 1878: 1824: 1812: 1780: 1768: 1737: 1717: 1705: 1693: 1646: 1634: 1618: 1603: 1579: 1567: 1549: 1531: 1515: 1503: 1484: 1477:, perhaps you would be kind enough to check them. Cheers, · · · 1423: 1411: 1352: 1334: 1256: 1237: 1215: 1196: 1171: 1156: 1138: 1121: 1101: 1085: 6812:

Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences

3086:- A very solid article, and well deserves a shiny star to it! 1048: 911:

contributor has declared a personal or professional connection

898: 462: 415: 227: 15: 6543:, and I'm trying to keep the Casier theories close together. 1469:

File:Megbook.jpg - looks OK, but I am not expert on fair use.

5588:

But why name one specifically out of several documentaries?

3106:

I'll take a look at this soon. Some initial thoughts below.

2848:

Mega shark series is a dab link, so that needs to be fixed.

2135:

entry in Wiktionary. Either reword or a footnote would do.

6777:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once

4671:

sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading."

4311:

Of course, got to that part after I added the comment...

1439:

File:Megalodon teeth.jpg - looks OK (dead link to source)

1145:

but I'm still holding onto the NatGeo documentary for now

5195:

It seems the term means it is higher in the food chain.

1802:

the neck of the tooth is where the root meets the crown

1710:

I see that this has been changed. Looks OK to me. · · ·

1224:

Do any of the scientific sources actually use the term "

6802:

Knowledge vital articles in Biology and health sciences

6130:

sign, also publisher location missing, and no page refs

1308: 1041: 1034: 1003: 385: 366: 347: 328: 309: 6817:

FA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences

2439:

Additional checks when researching for clarification.

1849:

Are these four sharks those which are now assigned to

1457:

File:Physeteroidea - Livyatan melvillei.JPG - looks OK

160: 6772:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page

6255:

Assuming it's now ref no. 79, it's already specified

4076:

where is the scientific name before the common name?

2011:"axial swimmers that flex their body for propulsion" 4296:

it's mentioned in the paragraph about chronospecies

1665:

Infobox gives four synonyms as C. spp. Are they all

843:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 627:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4698:"at the National Museum of Natural History (USNM), 2114:the source said “pig-eyed” which means popping out 1934:I just opened the paragraphs with "one idea is..." 1745:

competing figures still exist as to when it evolved

1143:I did the fossilworks thing (good idea by the way) 6837:FA-Class Palaeontology articles of High-importance 6192:Ref 75: publisher location missing and no page ref 5040:"its inferred tolerated temperature range is" Was? 1381:File:FMIB 45542 Cetorhinus maximus.jpeg - looks OK 279:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as 6822:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors 6745:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 5819:I've been using it for a while, seems okay to me 5102:it talks about its habitat and its effects on it 5720:- everything looks good to me now content-wise. 5292:"some species became pack predators" Like which? 3808:Again thanks for the response, much appreciated 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 6680:Hi, I write quality articles on Czech version ( 2759:..where it is defined as a "hazard" to the era. 1286:. No further edits should be made to this page. 1161:It took a while but I replaced the NatGeo ref 6751:No further edits should be made to this page. 6724:template in place on the talk page until the 4184:"Later on in the 1980s" Too informal wording. 1272:The following is an archived discussion of a 174: 8: 6787:Knowledge articles that use American English 5173:"a higher trophic level" Could be explained. 4700:which is part of the Smithsonian Institution 4335:paraphyly, which denotes the concept itself. 3878:No, it was just ambiguous in that instance. 1627:External links look OK on Checklinks. · · · 263:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 259:as one of the best articles produced by the 253:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 3949:I moved them to their appropriate sections 3469:Any reason why this restoration isn't used? 3351:I removed all the deadlinks and weird ones 2420:Prothero, D. R. (2015), 1 use checked as OK 2138:I just appendaged an explainer on the end 554:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 6517:That's where I've paused; more to come. -- 1853:? If so it would be clearer to mention it. 1639:Redirect check looks OK on Rdcheck. · · · 1284:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 789: 678: 573: 557:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 505: 433:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 288: 235: 4787:already listed in the Statistics section 3338:changed to "In fiction and cryptozoology" 3013:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Images#Location 1387:File:Carcharodon megalodon.jpg - looks OK 3238:I changed it to "Fiction and sightings" 2826:Commented to end of article text. · · · 1847:was erected and included the four sharks 960:) This user has declared a connection. ( 466: 4869:, but rather it is just the reason why. 2423:Bendix-Almgreen, Svend Erik (1983) - OK 791: 680: 575: 507: 6832:High-importance Palaeontology articles 6107:Added the website and publisher (from 2758: 2699: 2652: 2604: 2356: 2248: 2198: 2182: 1971: 1842: 1744: 1445:File:Megalodon skeleton.jpg - looks OK 939: 935: 2443:Pimiento, C.; Balk, M. A. (2015) - OK 1540:appears to be an unmodified version. 740:. This project is an offshoot of the 453:, this should not be changed without 7: 6877:Articles with connected contributors 4629:changed "weaker" to "less-reliable" 4105:I saw one for the mako shark, fixed 3532:The image is right here on the site: 2657:average position for this individual 2278:To what does "more so" refer? · · · 837:This article is within the scope of 621:This article is within the scope of 3127:I moved the great white image down 2978:Oh no, completely forgot about it! 1384:File:Megalodon scale.svg - looks OK 641:Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology 23:for discussing improvements to the 6842:WikiProject Palaeontology articles 6248:Ref 76: publisher location missing 4269:added 17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 3915:What did Agassiz base the name on? 3182:I guess I'm leaving it as is then 2476:structure: Also seems appropriate. 2473:lead: Seems generally appropriate. 1864:was erected and included the four 644:Template:WikiProject Palaeontology 14: 6314:Changed to newspaper parameter – 5875:it’s written by palaeontologists 5741:Ref 7: publisher location missing 6797:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 3550:The image is licensed NC. · · · 2605:largest fish that has ever lived 2461:comprehensive: Looks good to me. 1052: 934:Error: Disclosures that use the 902: 824: 814: 793: 713: 703: 682: 608: 598: 577: 527: 509: 476: 467: 419: 272: 239: 209: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 6852:High-importance Fishes articles 6827:FA-Class Palaeontology articles 6807:FA-Class level-5 vital articles 6085:Ref 57: lacks publisher details 4935:"from Gram Formation" From the. 4816:added max size for great white 4687:merged with Estimations section 1556:File:Land shallow topo 2048.jpg 1538:File:Earthmap1000x500compac.jpg 1378:File:White shark.jpg - looks OK 877:This article has been rated as 772:This article has been rated as 661:This article has been rated as 4368:depends who you ask. Some say 4017:I did that to avoid confusion 2411:Does Megalodon still live - OK 2305:That is an explanation of the 2208:I just removed “post-cranial” 1372:File:Stenoshark.jpg - looks OK 1157:03:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 1139:01:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC) 1122:22:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 1102:20:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 560:Guild of Copy Editors articles 496:It is of interest to multiple 1: 6867:Top-importance shark articles 6663:14:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC) 6631:15:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 6617:01:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC) 6591:04:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC) 6577:05:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC) 6137:I just specified the chapter 6129:Ref 71: there's a stray : --> 3619:added to the Anatomy section 3279:"Modern era"? "Appearances"? 2834:11:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC) 2815:08:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2803:08:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2795:would make more sense. · · · 2783:00:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2748:08:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2736:00:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2718:07:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC) 2689:08:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2677:00:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2642:08:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2630:00:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2594:08:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2582:00:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2542:06:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC) 2530:18:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC) 2501:04:47, 25 November 2017 (UTC) 2426:Fitzgerald, Erich (2004) - OK 2199:post-cranial generated forces 1436:File:Megalodon.jpg - looks OK 1086:22:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC) 942:for at least one contributor. 851:and see a list of open tasks. 635:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 6782:Old requests for peer review 6738:12:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC) 6698:09:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC) 6554:23:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 6527:05:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 6461:03:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 6446:01:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 6429:23:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 6410:20:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 6376:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 6361:13:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 6341:16:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 6324:22:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 6310:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 6280:22:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 6266:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 6238:23:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 6224:22:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 6210:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 6177:23:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 6163:22:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 6148:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 6121:22:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 6103:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 6073:00:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 6058:23:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 6044:13:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 6014:00:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 5999:23:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5985:13:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 5951:19:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 5936:16:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 5921:00:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 5901:23:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5886:13:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 5860:13:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 5830:00:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 5815:23:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5801:13:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 5773:23:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5759:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 5730:23:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC) 5713:15:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 5695:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5669:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5643:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5613:22:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5598:20:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5584:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5558:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5532:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5506:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5480:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5454:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5428:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5402:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5376:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5336:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5310:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5284:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5258:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5220:22:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5205:20:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 5191:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5180:does "more predatory" work? 5165:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5139:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5113:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5087:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5058:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5032:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 5005:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4979:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4953:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4913:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4887:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4857:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4827:22:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 4812:20:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 4798:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4772:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4746:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4720:23:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4683:17:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 4666:22:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4640:22:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4614:22:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4583:22:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4554:22:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4528:22:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4498:22:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4472:22:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4446:22:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4420:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4394:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4353:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4321:13:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4307:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4254:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4228:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4202:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4176:22:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 4146:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4116:04:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC) 4101:13:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4087:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4057:22:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 4042:13:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 4028:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 4002:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 3974:13:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 3960:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 3933:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 3903:22:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 3888:13:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 3874:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 3848:17:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) 3821:15:53, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3784:Now for your main question: 3752:01:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3726:23:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 3685:23:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3670:09:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3656:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3630:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3590:23:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3575:16:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3558:16:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3546:13:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3528:13:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3512:09:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3491:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3453:09:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3437:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3422:15:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3397:contains species other than 3389:14:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3362:14:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3305:09:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3290:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3275:15:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3261:15:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3249:14:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3223:14:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3193:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3178:15:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3164:14:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3138:14:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3116:12:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3096:06:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3079:19:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 3062:00:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3034:00:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 3002:00:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 2971:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 2952:02:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC) 2934:05:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2915:23:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2885:16:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2867:15:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2389:06:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC) 2377:19:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2333:15:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 2321:08:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 2301:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 2286:06:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC) 2274:15:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2231:06:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC) 2219:19:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2161:19:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 2149:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 2125:12:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC) 2087:05:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 2075:00:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 2060:07:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 2037:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 2022:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 2005:06:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC) 1992:23:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 1957:08:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 1945:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1927:15:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 1891:19:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1879:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1825:19:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1813:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1781:07:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 1769:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1738:09:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC) 1718:15:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 1706:06:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC) 1694:01:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1647:19:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1635:19:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1619:06:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 1604:19:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1580:19:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1568:04:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 1550:03:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 1532:22:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1516:19:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1504:19:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1485:19:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1424:19:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 1412:22:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1353:01:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1335:01:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 857:Knowledge:WikiProject Sharks 752:Knowledge:WikiProject Fishes 6872:WikiProject Sharks articles 6857:WikiProject Fishes articles 6767:Knowledge featured articles 6719:featured article candidates 6602:Day 20: You know you don't 6418:I will do this on Saturday 6386:Comments by Jens Lallensack 2842:Support from Adityavagarwal 2201:? Link would be sufficient. 1274:featured article nomination 1257:02:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1238:01:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1216:02:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1197:01:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1172:19:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC) 1064:discussion has been closed. 860:Template:WikiProject Sharks 755:Template:WikiProject Fishes 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 6893: 6647:Comment from Chiswick Chap 4876:changed to "consequently" 3405:cannot be synonyms of the 3371:should also redirect here. 3295:significance" could work. 1680:sure, but not synonyms of 1611:Done with alt-text. · · · 938:parameter should also use 883:project's importance scale 778:project's importance scale 667:project's importance scale 393:Featured article candidate 2408:Roesch, B. S. (1998) - OK 1508:Thanks Nikkimaria. · · · 1307:) 12:06, 8 December 2017 876: 809: 771: 698: 660: 624:WikiProject Palaeontology 593: 522: 504: 402: 355:Good article reassessment 336:Good article reassessment 291: 287: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 6847:FA-Class Fishes articles 6748:Please do not modify it. 3892:changed to "this shark" 2873:Mega Shark (film series) 2045:water is less ambiguous. 1279:Please do not modify it. 909:The following Knowledge 743:WikiProject Tree of Life 726:This article is part of 281:Today's featured article 6862:FA-Class shark articles 6792:FA-Class vital articles 6434:most likely on Saturday 1554:I switched it out with 962:Special:Diff/1090031708 6606:to do a review right? 6499:Carcharodon carcharias 6487:Carcharodon carcharias 4382:Megaselachus megalodon 4374:Carcharocles megalodon 3608:There is a photo of a 3401:, so synonyms of that 3101:Comments from FunkMonk 2130:found definitions for 1949:That is better. · · · 1361:Support by Pbsouthwood 647:Palaeontology articles 75:avoid personal attacks 4702:" Why is this needed? 4409:I just wikilinked it 4370:Carcharodon megalodon 3739:Carcharodon megalodon 3737:from 2016 that says " 2659:mean in this context? 2534:Thanks, on it. · · · 2414:Alten, S. (2011) - OK 2190:Teeth and bite forces 1793:visible V-shaped neck 923:neutral point of view 551:Guild of Copy Editors 548:, on 2 November 2015. 545:Guild of Copy Editors 517:Guild of Copy Editors 483:level-5 vital article 203:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 6686:cs:Létavec stěhovavý 6473:Comments from RL0919 6292:should be italicised 915:conflict of interest 451:relevant style guide 447:varieties of English 317:Good article nominee 105:No original research 6609:User:Dunkleosteus77 6569:User:Dunkleosteus77 6546:User:Dunkleosteus77 6453:User:Dunkleosteus77 6438:User:Dunkleosteus77 6421:User:Dunkleosteus77 6368:User:Dunkleosteus77 6365:Well that happened 6353:User:Dunkleosteus77 6302:User:Dunkleosteus77 6258:User:Dunkleosteus77 6202:User:Dunkleosteus77 6140:User:Dunkleosteus77 6095:User:Dunkleosteus77 6065:User:Dunkleosteus77 6036:User:Dunkleosteus77 6006:User:Dunkleosteus77 5977:User:Dunkleosteus77 5943:User:Dunkleosteus77 5913:User:Dunkleosteus77 5878:User:Dunkleosteus77 5852:User:Dunkleosteus77 5822:User:Dunkleosteus77 5793:User:Dunkleosteus77 5751:User:Dunkleosteus77 5687:User:Dunkleosteus77 5661:User:Dunkleosteus77 5635:User:Dunkleosteus77 5605:User:Dunkleosteus77 5576:User:Dunkleosteus77 5550:User:Dunkleosteus77 5524:User:Dunkleosteus77 5498:User:Dunkleosteus77 5472:User:Dunkleosteus77 5446:User:Dunkleosteus77 5420:User:Dunkleosteus77 5394:User:Dunkleosteus77 5368:User:Dunkleosteus77 5328:User:Dunkleosteus77 5302:User:Dunkleosteus77 5276:User:Dunkleosteus77 5250:User:Dunkleosteus77 5212:User:Dunkleosteus77 5183:User:Dunkleosteus77 5157:User:Dunkleosteus77 5131:User:Dunkleosteus77 5105:User:Dunkleosteus77 5079:User:Dunkleosteus77 5050:User:Dunkleosteus77 5024:User:Dunkleosteus77 4997:User:Dunkleosteus77 4971:User:Dunkleosteus77 4945:User:Dunkleosteus77 4905:User:Dunkleosteus77 4879:User:Dunkleosteus77 4849:User:Dunkleosteus77 4819:User:Dunkleosteus77 4790:User:Dunkleosteus77 4764:User:Dunkleosteus77 4738:User:Dunkleosteus77 4712:User:Dunkleosteus77 4658:User:Dunkleosteus77 4632:User:Dunkleosteus77 4606:User:Dunkleosteus77 4575:User:Dunkleosteus77 4546:User:Dunkleosteus77 4520:User:Dunkleosteus77 4490:User:Dunkleosteus77 4464:User:Dunkleosteus77 4438:User:Dunkleosteus77 4412:User:Dunkleosteus77 4386:User:Dunkleosteus77 4345:User:Dunkleosteus77 4299:User:Dunkleosteus77 4272:User:Dunkleosteus77 4246:User:Dunkleosteus77 4220:User:Dunkleosteus77 4194:User:Dunkleosteus77 4168:User:Dunkleosteus77 4138:User:Dunkleosteus77 4108:User:Dunkleosteus77 4079:User:Dunkleosteus77 4049:User:Dunkleosteus77 4020:User:Dunkleosteus77 3994:User:Dunkleosteus77 3952:User:Dunkleosteus77 3925:User:Dunkleosteus77 3895:User:Dunkleosteus77 3866:User:Dunkleosteus77 3840:User:Dunkleosteus77 3744:User:Dunkleosteus77 3677:User:Dunkleosteus77 3648:User:Dunkleosteus77 3622:User:Dunkleosteus77 3582:User:Dunkleosteus77 3520:User:Dunkleosteus77 3483:User:Dunkleosteus77 3429:User:Dunkleosteus77 3381:User:Dunkleosteus77 3354:User:Dunkleosteus77 3282:User:Dunkleosteus77 3241:User:Dunkleosteus77 3215:User:Dunkleosteus77 3185:User:Dunkleosteus77 3156:User:Dunkleosteus77 3130:User:Dunkleosteus77 3054:User:Dunkleosteus77 3026:User:Dunkleosteus77 2994:User:Dunkleosteus77 2963:User:Dunkleosteus77 2944:User:Dunkleosteus77 2907:User:Dunkleosteus77 2859:User:Dunkleosteus77 2775:User:Dunkleosteus77 2728:User:Dunkleosteus77 2725:changed to "birth" 2669:User:Dunkleosteus77 2622:User:Dunkleosteus77 2574:User:Dunkleosteus77 2522:User:Dunkleosteus77 2369:User:Dunkleosteus77 2293:User:Dunkleosteus77 2266:User:Dunkleosteus77 2211:User:Dunkleosteus77 2141:User:Dunkleosteus77 2117:User:Dunkleosteus77 2067:User:Dunkleosteus77 2029:User:Dunkleosteus77 2014:User:Dunkleosteus77 1984:User:Dunkleosteus77 1937:User:Dunkleosteus77 1919:User:Dunkleosteus77 1901:External appearance 1871:User:Dunkleosteus77 1843:in 1960, the genus 1805:User:Dunkleosteus77 1761:User:Dunkleosteus77 1686:User:Dunkleosteus77 1560:User:Dunkleosteus77 1524:User:Dunkleosteus77 1404:User:Dunkleosteus77 1345:User:Dunkleosteus77 1327:User:Dunkleosteus77 1249:User:Dunkleosteus77 1208:User:Dunkleosteus77 1164:User:Dunkleosteus77 1149:User:Dunkleosteus77 1114:User:Dunkleosteus77 1078:User:Dunkleosteus77 616:Paleontology portal 449:. According to the 261:Knowledge community 5748:Which one's that? 3774:without scrutiny. 2608:largest fish ever 2481:Not checked (yet). 2349:Prey relationships 1246:I just removed it 840:WikiProject Sharks 738:WikiProject Fishes 729:WikiProject Fishes 542:, a member of the 492:content assessment 292:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 4163:great white shark 3552:Peter (Southwood) 3255:Peter (Southwood) 3153:any ideas where? 2828:Peter (Southwood) 2809:Peter (Southwood) 2797:Peter (Southwood) 2742:Peter (Southwood) 2712:Peter (Southwood) 2683:Peter (Southwood) 2636:Peter (Southwood) 2588:Peter (Southwood) 2536:Peter (Southwood) 2495:Peter (Southwood) 2489:length. Seems OK. 2383:Peter (Southwood) 2327:Peter (Southwood) 2315:Peter (Southwood) 2280:Peter (Southwood) 2241:Range and habitat 2225:Peter (Southwood) 2155:Peter (Southwood) 2081:Peter (Southwood) 2054:Peter (Southwood) 1999:Peter (Southwood) 1951:Peter (Southwood) 1885:Peter (Southwood) 1819:Peter (Southwood) 1775:Peter (Southwood) 1749:Competing figures 1732:Peter (Southwood) 1712:Peter (Southwood) 1700:Peter (Southwood) 1641:Peter (Southwood) 1629:Peter (Southwood) 1613:Peter (Southwood) 1598:Peter (Southwood) 1574:Peter (Southwood) 1510:Peter (Southwood) 1479:Peter (Southwood) 1418:Peter (Southwood) 1338: 1069: 1068: 1042:Watch peer review 970: 969: 897: 896: 893: 892: 889: 888: 788: 787: 784: 783: 677: 676: 673: 672: 572: 571: 568: 567: 534:This article was 461: 460: 414: 413: 410: 409: 283:on July 22, 2018. 234: 233: 66:Assume good faith 43: 6884: 6750: 6723: 6717: 6714:, and leave the 6682:cs:Mantela zlatá 6679: 6615: 6601: 6575: 6564: 6552: 6459: 6444: 6427: 6374: 6359: 6308: 6264: 6208: 6146: 6101: 6071: 6042: 6012: 5983: 5949: 5919: 5884: 5858: 5828: 5799: 5757: 5693: 5667: 5641: 5611: 5582: 5556: 5530: 5504: 5478: 5452: 5426: 5400: 5374: 5334: 5308: 5282: 5256: 5218: 5189: 5163: 5137: 5111: 5085: 5056: 5030: 5003: 4977: 4951: 4911: 4885: 4855: 4825: 4796: 4770: 4744: 4718: 4664: 4638: 4612: 4581: 4552: 4526: 4496: 4470: 4444: 4418: 4392: 4378:Otodus megalodon 4351: 4305: 4278: 4252: 4226: 4200: 4174: 4144: 4114: 4085: 4055: 4026: 4000: 3958: 3931: 3901: 3872: 3846: 3805:Hope this helps 3750: 3683: 3654: 3628: 3588: 3526: 3489: 3435: 3387: 3360: 3288: 3247: 3221: 3191: 3162: 3136: 3060: 3032: 3000: 2983:Link naturalist. 2969: 2950: 2923:More by evening! 2913: 2865: 2781: 2734: 2675: 2628: 2580: 2528: 2514: 2448:General criteria 2375: 2299: 2272: 2217: 2147: 2123: 2073: 2064:is it good now? 2035: 2020: 1990: 1943: 1925: 1877: 1811: 1767: 1692: 1566: 1536:The problem is, 1530: 1416:OK to me. · · · 1410: 1365:Image licenses: 1351: 1333: 1322: 1291:The article was 1281: 1255: 1214: 1170: 1155: 1120: 1084: 1056: 1055: 1049: 1039: 1030: 1011: 944: 943: 941: 937: 929:Compassionate727 906: 905: 899: 865: 864: 861: 858: 855: 834: 829: 828: 818: 811: 810: 805: 797: 790: 760: 759: 756: 753: 750: 723: 718: 717: 716: 707: 700: 699: 694: 686: 679: 649: 648: 645: 642: 639: 618: 613: 612: 611: 602: 595: 594: 589: 581: 574: 562: 561: 558: 555: 552: 531: 524: 523: 513: 506: 489: 480: 479: 472: 471: 463: 430:American English 426:This article is 423: 416: 405:Featured article 403:Current status: 388: 386:December 8, 2017 369: 367:October 11, 2017 350: 331: 312: 310:January 17, 2008 289: 276: 251:featured article 243: 236: 228: 214: 213: 204: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 6892: 6891: 6887: 6886: 6885: 6883: 6882: 6881: 6757: 6756: 6755: 6746: 6721: 6715: 6673: 6671: 6649: 6607: 6595: 6567: 6558: 6544: 6475: 6451: 6436: 6419: 6402:Jens Lallensack 6388: 6366: 6351: 6300: 6256: 6200: 6138: 6093: 6063: 6034: 6004: 5975: 5941: 5911: 5876: 5850: 5820: 5791: 5749: 5738: 5685: 5659: 5633: 5603: 5574: 5548: 5522: 5496: 5470: 5444: 5418: 5392: 5366: 5326: 5300: 5274: 5248: 5210: 5181: 5155: 5129: 5103: 5077: 5048: 5022: 4995: 4969: 4943: 4903: 4877: 4847: 4817: 4788: 4762: 4736: 4710: 4656: 4630: 4604: 4573: 4544: 4518: 4488: 4462: 4436: 4410: 4384: 4380:, and some say 4343: 4297: 4270: 4244: 4218: 4192: 4166: 4136: 4106: 4077: 4047: 4018: 3992: 3950: 3923: 3893: 3864: 3838: 3742: 3675: 3646: 3620: 3580: 3518: 3481: 3427: 3379: 3352: 3280: 3239: 3213: 3183: 3154: 3128: 3103: 3052: 3024: 2992: 2961: 2942: 2905: 2857: 2844: 2787:I see. Perhaps 2773: 2726: 2667: 2620: 2572: 2554: 2552:latest comments 2520: 2508: 2450: 2401: 2367: 2291: 2264: 2209: 2139: 2115: 2065: 2050:fish locomotion 2027: 2012: 1982: 1935: 1917: 1869: 1803: 1759: 1684: 1655: 1572:OK to me · · · 1558: 1522: 1402: 1363: 1343: 1325: 1319: 1277: 1267: 1247: 1206: 1162: 1147: 1112: 1076: 1053: 1045: 1020: 997: 991: 987: 980: 940:|editedhere=yes 933: 932: 903: 862: 859: 856: 853: 852: 830: 823: 803: 774:High-importance 758:Fishes articles 757: 754: 751: 748: 747: 719: 714: 712: 693:High‑importance 692: 663:High-importance 646: 643: 640: 637: 636: 614: 609: 607: 588:High‑importance 587: 559: 556: 553: 550: 549: 490:on Knowledge's 487: 477: 455:broad consensus 384: 365: 348:August 19, 2012 346: 327: 308: 230: 229: 224: 201: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 6890: 6888: 6880: 6879: 6874: 6869: 6864: 6859: 6854: 6849: 6844: 6839: 6834: 6829: 6824: 6819: 6814: 6809: 6804: 6799: 6794: 6789: 6784: 6779: 6774: 6769: 6759: 6758: 6754: 6753: 6741: 6740: 6728:goes through. 6676:Dunkleosteus77 6670: 6667: 6666: 6665: 6648: 6645: 6644: 6643: 6642: 6641: 6640: 6639: 6638: 6637: 6636: 6635: 6634: 6633: 6515: 6514: 6511: 6508: 6505: 6502: 6483: 6474: 6471: 6470: 6469: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6413: 6412: 6398: 6395: 6387: 6384: 6383: 6382: 6381: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6329: 6328: 6327: 6326: 6312: 6294: 6293: 6290:New York Times 6285: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6268: 6250: 6249: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6212: 6194: 6193: 6189: 6188: 6187: 6186: 6185: 6184: 6183: 6182: 6150: 6132: 6131: 6126: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6105: 6087: 6086: 6082: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6078: 6077: 6076: 6075: 6028: 6027: 6023: 6022: 6021: 6020: 6019: 6018: 6017: 6016: 5969: 5968: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5870: 5869: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5844: 5843: 5839: 5838: 5837: 5836: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5785: 5784: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5743: 5742: 5737: 5736:Sources review 5734: 5733: 5732: 5715: 5700: 5699: 5698: 5697: 5679: 5678: 5674: 5673: 5672: 5671: 5653: 5652: 5648: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5627: 5626: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5568: 5567: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5542: 5541: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5516: 5515: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5490: 5489: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5464: 5463: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5438: 5437: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5412: 5411: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5386: 5385: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5360: 5359: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5352: 5346: 5345: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5338: 5320: 5319: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5294: 5293: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5268: 5267: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5242: 5241: 5229: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5175: 5174: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5167: 5149: 5148: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5123: 5122: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5097: 5096: 5092: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5068: 5067: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5042: 5041: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5015: 5014: 5010: 5009: 5008: 5007: 4989: 4988: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4963: 4962: 4958: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4937: 4936: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4923: 4922: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4897: 4896: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4889: 4871: 4870: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4841: 4840: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4782: 4781: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4756: 4755: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4730: 4729: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4704: 4703: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4650: 4649: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4624: 4623: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4598: 4597: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4567: 4566: 4563: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4512: 4511: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4482: 4481: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4456: 4455: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4430: 4429: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4363: 4362: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4337: 4336: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4291: 4290: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4264: 4263: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4238: 4237: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4212: 4211: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4186: 4185: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4156: 4155: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4130: 4129: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4071: 4070: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4012: 4011: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 3986: 3985: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3944: 3943: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3917: 3916: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3858: 3857: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3832: 3831: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3701: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3640: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3614: 3613: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3577: 3562:Not on Commons 3474: 3473: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3373: 3372: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3323: 3322: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3207: 3206: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3122: 3121: 3118: 3102: 3099: 3088:Adityavagarwal 3071:Adityavagarwal 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3046: 3045: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3018: 3017: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 2986: 2985: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2955: 2954: 2926:Adityavagarwal 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2899: 2898: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2851: 2850: 2843: 2837: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2767: 2766: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2708: 2707: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2661: 2660: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2614: 2613: 2612:to have lived. 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2566: 2565: 2562:This reference 2558: 2553: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2491: 2490: 2487: 2484: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2465: 2462: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2449: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2437: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2409: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2361: 2360: 2353: 2352: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2257: 2256: 2245: 2244: 2242: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2203: 2202: 2194: 2193: 2191: 2187: 2186: 2179: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2046: 2024: 1976: 1975: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1911: 1910: 1905: 1904: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1862:Procarcharodon 1855: 1854: 1845:Procarcharodon 1839: 1838: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1797: 1796: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1753: 1752: 1741: 1740: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1671: 1670: 1662: 1661: 1659: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1637: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1492:this statement 1471: 1470: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1396: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1362: 1356: 1340: 1339: 1324:Nominator(s): 1318: 1313: 1312: 1289: 1288: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1241: 1240: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1200: 1199: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1105: 1104: 1067: 1066: 1057: 1047: 1046: 1044: 990: 986: 981: 979: 976: 974: 968: 967: 966: 965: 926: 907: 895: 894: 891: 890: 887: 886: 879:Top-importance 875: 869: 868: 866: 863:shark articles 849:the discussion 836: 835: 819: 807: 806: 804:Top‑importance 798: 786: 785: 782: 781: 770: 764: 763: 761: 725: 724: 708: 696: 695: 687: 675: 674: 671: 670: 659: 653: 652: 650: 633:the discussion 620: 619: 603: 591: 590: 582: 570: 569: 566: 565: 563: 532: 520: 519: 514: 502: 501: 495: 473: 459: 458: 424: 412: 411: 408: 407: 400: 399: 396: 389: 381: 380: 377: 370: 362: 361: 358: 351: 343: 342: 339: 332: 329:March 31, 2009 324: 323: 320: 313: 305: 304: 301: 298: 294: 293: 285: 284: 277: 269: 268: 244: 232: 231: 222: 220: 219: 216: 215: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6889: 6878: 6875: 6873: 6870: 6868: 6865: 6863: 6860: 6858: 6855: 6853: 6850: 6848: 6845: 6843: 6840: 6838: 6835: 6833: 6830: 6828: 6825: 6823: 6820: 6818: 6815: 6813: 6810: 6808: 6805: 6803: 6800: 6798: 6795: 6793: 6790: 6788: 6785: 6783: 6780: 6778: 6775: 6773: 6770: 6768: 6765: 6764: 6762: 6752: 6749: 6743: 6742: 6739: 6735: 6731: 6727: 6720: 6713: 6709: 6705: 6702: 6701: 6700: 6699: 6695: 6691: 6687: 6683: 6677: 6668: 6664: 6660: 6656: 6655:Chiswick Chap 6651: 6650: 6646: 6632: 6628: 6624: 6620: 6619: 6618: 6614: 6610: 6605: 6599: 6594: 6593: 6592: 6588: 6584: 6580: 6579: 6578: 6574: 6570: 6562: 6557: 6556: 6555: 6551: 6547: 6542: 6538: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6530: 6529: 6528: 6524: 6520: 6512: 6509: 6506: 6503: 6500: 6496: 6492: 6488: 6484: 6481: 6480: 6479: 6472: 6462: 6458: 6454: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6443: 6439: 6435: 6432: 6431: 6430: 6426: 6422: 6417: 6416: 6415: 6414: 6411: 6407: 6403: 6399: 6396: 6393: 6392: 6391: 6385: 6377: 6373: 6369: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6350: 6347: 6346: 6345: 6344: 6343: 6342: 6338: 6334: 6325: 6321: 6317: 6313: 6311: 6307: 6303: 6298: 6297: 6296: 6295: 6291: 6287: 6286: 6281: 6277: 6273: 6269: 6267: 6263: 6259: 6254: 6253: 6252: 6251: 6247: 6246: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6221: 6217: 6213: 6211: 6207: 6203: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6191: 6190: 6180: 6179: 6178: 6174: 6170: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6160: 6156: 6151: 6149: 6145: 6141: 6136: 6135: 6134: 6133: 6128: 6127: 6122: 6118: 6114: 6110: 6106: 6104: 6100: 6096: 6091: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6084: 6083: 6074: 6070: 6066: 6061: 6060: 6059: 6055: 6051: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6032: 6031: 6030: 6029: 6025: 6024: 6015: 6011: 6007: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5996: 5992: 5988: 5987: 5986: 5982: 5978: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5970: 5966: 5965: 5952: 5948: 5944: 5939: 5938: 5937: 5933: 5929: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5918: 5914: 5908: 5904: 5903: 5902: 5898: 5894: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5874: 5873: 5872: 5871: 5867: 5866: 5861: 5857: 5853: 5849:Same’s above 5848: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5841: 5840: 5831: 5827: 5823: 5818: 5817: 5816: 5812: 5808: 5804: 5803: 5802: 5798: 5794: 5789: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5782: 5781: 5774: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5756: 5752: 5747: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5740: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5727: 5723: 5719: 5716: 5714: 5710: 5706: 5702: 5701: 5696: 5692: 5688: 5683: 5682: 5681: 5680: 5676: 5675: 5670: 5666: 5662: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5650: 5649: 5644: 5640: 5636: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5624: 5623: 5614: 5610: 5606: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5581: 5577: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5565: 5564: 5559: 5555: 5551: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5539: 5538: 5533: 5529: 5525: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5513: 5512: 5507: 5503: 5499: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5487: 5486: 5481: 5477: 5473: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5461: 5460: 5455: 5451: 5447: 5442: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5435: 5434: 5429: 5425: 5421: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5409: 5408: 5403: 5399: 5395: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5387: 5383: 5382: 5377: 5373: 5369: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5357: 5356: 5350: 5349: 5348: 5347: 5343: 5342: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5321: 5317: 5316: 5311: 5307: 5303: 5298: 5297: 5296: 5295: 5291: 5290: 5285: 5281: 5277: 5272: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5265: 5264: 5259: 5255: 5251: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5240:." Redundant. 5239: 5235: 5231: 5230: 5221: 5217: 5213: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5193: 5192: 5188: 5184: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5172: 5171: 5166: 5162: 5158: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5146: 5145: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5120: 5119: 5114: 5110: 5106: 5101: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5094: 5093: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5065: 5064: 5059: 5055: 5051: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5039: 5038: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5012: 5011: 5006: 5002: 4998: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4986: 4985: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4960: 4959: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4934: 4933: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4920: 4919: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4894: 4893: 4888: 4884: 4880: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4863: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4838: 4837: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4815: 4814: 4813: 4809: 4805: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4786: 4785: 4784: 4783: 4779: 4778: 4773: 4769: 4765: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4753: 4752: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4734: 4733: 4732: 4731: 4727: 4726: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4701: 4697: 4696: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4673: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4647: 4646: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4621: 4620: 4615: 4611: 4607: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4595: 4590: 4589: 4584: 4580: 4576: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4564: 4561: 4560: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4535: 4534: 4529: 4525: 4521: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4504: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4479: 4478: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4453: 4452: 4447: 4443: 4439: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4431: 4427: 4426: 4421: 4417: 4413: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4401: 4400: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4360: 4359: 4354: 4350: 4346: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4334: 4330: 4329: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4288: 4287:chronospecies 4284: 4283: 4277: 4273: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4261: 4260: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4235: 4234: 4229: 4225: 4221: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4209: 4208: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4182: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4164: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4153: 4152: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4127: 4126: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4068: 4067: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4009: 4008: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3983: 3982: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3964:Much better. 3963: 3962: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3940: 3939: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3914: 3913: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3854: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3830:of the names. 3829: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3811:Kind regards 3809: 3806: 3803: 3799: 3797: 3793: 3788: 3785: 3782: 3779: 3775: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3716:Kind regards 3714: 3710: 3706: 3703: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3637: 3636: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3606: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3578: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3555: 3553: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3534: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3502: 3500: 3498: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3471: 3468: 3467: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3369: 3368: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3350: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3320: 3319: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3258: 3256: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3230: 3229: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3204: 3203: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3144: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3119: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3104: 3100: 3098: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3044: 3041: 3040: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3016: 3014: 3009: 3008: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2984: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960:wifi at last 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2924: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2849: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2838: 2836: 2835: 2831: 2829: 2816: 2812: 2810: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2800: 2798: 2794: 2792: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2749: 2745: 2743: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2715: 2713: 2705: 2701: 2698: 2697: 2690: 2686: 2684: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2651: 2650: 2643: 2639: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2611: 2606: 2603: 2602: 2595: 2591: 2589: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2556: 2555: 2551: 2543: 2539: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2518: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2498: 2496: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2478: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2455: 2454: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2434: 2431: 2428: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2398: 2390: 2386: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2334: 2330: 2328: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2253: 2252: 2247: 2246: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2232: 2228: 2226: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2192: 2189: 2188: 2184: 2181: 2180: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2162: 2158: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2137: 2136: 2133: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2088: 2084: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2057: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2025: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 2000: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1958: 1954: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1907: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1892: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1846: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1826: 1822: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1795:on the teeth? 1794: 1790: 1789: 1782: 1778: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758:disagreement 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1733: 1729: 1728: 1719: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1642: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1630: 1626: 1620: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1581: 1577: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1480: 1476: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1456: 1453: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1425: 1421: 1419: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1287: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1269: 1264: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1185: 1184: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1073: 1065: 1063: 1058: 1051: 1050: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1005: 1001: 996: 995: 989: 988: 985: 982: 977: 975: 972: 963: 959: 956: 953: 949: 948:Havivavrahami 946: 945: 930: 924: 920: 919:autobiography 916: 912: 908: 901: 900: 884: 880: 874: 871: 870: 867: 850: 846: 842: 841: 833: 832:Sharks portal 827: 822: 820: 817: 813: 812: 808: 802: 799: 796: 792: 779: 775: 769: 766: 765: 762: 745: 744: 739: 735: 731: 730: 722: 711: 709: 706: 702: 701: 697: 691: 688: 685: 681: 668: 664: 658: 655: 654: 651: 638:Palaeontology 634: 630: 629:palaeontology 626: 625: 617: 606: 604: 601: 597: 596: 592: 586: 585:Palaeontology 583: 580: 576: 564: 547: 546: 541: 537: 533: 530: 526: 525: 521: 518: 515: 512: 508: 503: 499: 493: 485: 484: 474: 470: 465: 464: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 431: 425: 422: 418: 417: 406: 401: 397: 395: 394: 390: 387: 383: 382: 378: 376: 375: 371: 368: 364: 363: 359: 357: 356: 352: 349: 345: 344: 340: 338: 337: 333: 330: 326: 325: 321: 319: 318: 314: 311: 307: 306: 302: 299: 296: 295: 290: 286: 282: 278: 275: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 257: 252: 248: 245: 242: 238: 237: 218: 217: 212: 208: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 6747: 6744: 6704:Closing note 6703: 6672: 6613:push to talk 6603: 6573:push to talk 6550:push to talk 6541:Carcharocles 6540: 6536: 6516: 6498: 6494: 6490: 6486: 6476: 6457:push to talk 6442:push to talk 6433: 6425:push to talk 6389: 6372:push to talk 6357:push to talk 6348: 6333:Brianboulton 6330: 6306:push to talk 6289: 6262:push to talk 6230:Brianboulton 6206:push to talk 6169:Brianboulton 6144:push to talk 6099:push to talk 6069:push to talk 6050:Brianboulton 6040:push to talk 6010:push to talk 5991:Brianboulton 5981:push to talk 5947:push to talk 5928:Brianboulton 5917:push to talk 5907:an interview 5893:Brianboulton 5882:push to talk 5856:push to talk 5826:push to talk 5807:Brianboulton 5797:push to talk 5765:Brianboulton 5755:push to talk 5717: 5691:push to talk 5665:push to talk 5639:push to talk 5609:push to talk 5580:push to talk 5554:push to talk 5528:push to talk 5502:push to talk 5476:push to talk 5450:push to talk 5424:push to talk 5398:push to talk 5372:push to talk 5332:push to talk 5306:push to talk 5280:push to talk 5254:push to talk 5237: 5233: 5216:push to talk 5187:push to talk 5161:push to talk 5135:push to talk 5109:push to talk 5083:push to talk 5075:Carcharocles 5074: 5054:push to talk 5028:push to talk 5001:push to talk 4975:push to talk 4949:push to talk 4909:push to talk 4883:push to talk 4866: 4853:push to talk 4823:push to talk 4794:push to talk 4768:push to talk 4761:added "the" 4742:push to talk 4716:push to talk 4699: 4662:push to talk 4636:push to talk 4610:push to talk 4579:push to talk 4550:push to talk 4524:push to talk 4507: 4494:push to talk 4468:push to talk 4442:push to talk 4416:push to talk 4390:push to talk 4381: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4349:push to talk 4332: 4303:push to talk 4276:push to talk 4250:push to talk 4224:push to talk 4198:push to talk 4172:push to talk 4142:push to talk 4112:push to talk 4083:push to talk 4053:push to talk 4024:push to talk 3998:push to talk 3956:push to talk 3929:push to talk 3899:push to talk 3870:push to talk 3844:push to talk 3827: 3813:Hemiauchenia 3810: 3807: 3804: 3800: 3789: 3786: 3783: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3748:push to talk 3738: 3718:Hemiauchenia 3715: 3711: 3707: 3704: 3700: 3681:push to talk 3652:push to talk 3626:push to talk 3586:push to talk 3524:push to talk 3487:push to talk 3433:push to talk 3410:C. megalodon 3409: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3395:Carcharocles 3394: 3385:push to talk 3358:push to talk 3286:push to talk 3245:push to talk 3219:push to talk 3189:push to talk 3160:push to talk 3134:push to talk 3083: 3082: 3068: 3058:push to talk 3042: 3030:push to talk 3010: 2998:push to talk 2982: 2977: 2967:push to talk 2948:push to talk 2939: 2922: 2921: 2911:push to talk 2895: 2863:push to talk 2847: 2839: 2825: 2790: 2788: 2779:push to talk 2762: 2732:push to talk 2709: 2703: 2673:push to talk 2656: 2626:push to talk 2609: 2578:push to talk 2526:push to talk 2492: 2480: 2438: 2402: 2373:push to talk 2310: 2306: 2297:push to talk 2270:push to talk 2250: 2215:push to talk 2145:push to talk 2131: 2121:push to talk 2071:push to talk 2042: 2033:push to talk 2018:push to talk 1988:push to talk 1941:push to talk 1923:push to talk 1875:push to talk 1866:Carcharocles 1865: 1861: 1851:Carcharocles 1850: 1844: 1809:push to talk 1792: 1791:What is the 1765:push to talk 1748: 1690:push to talk 1681: 1678:Carcharocles 1677: 1676:Synonyms of 1667:Carcharocles 1666: 1564:push to talk 1528:push to talk 1472: 1408:push to talk 1364: 1358: 1349:push to talk 1341: 1331:push to talk 1323: 1292: 1290: 1278: 1271: 1253:push to talk 1226:missing link 1212:push to talk 1168:push to talk 1153:push to talk 1144: 1118:push to talk 1082:push to talk 1074: 1070: 1059: 1035: 1031: 1017:Article talk 1016: 1015: 1012: 993: 973: 971: 954: 910: 878: 838: 773: 741: 727: 662: 622: 543: 498:WikiProjects 481: 442: 438: 434: 427: 404: 391: 372: 353: 334: 315: 265:please do so 254: 246: 206: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 6537:Carcharodon 6495:Carcharodon 6491:Carcharodon 5238:opportunity 5234:opportunist 5073:changed to 4376:, some say 4372:, some say 2875:article. -- 2517:User:RL0919 2511:Pbsouthwood 2479:citations: 1747:- What are 1062:peer review 1004:visual edit 978:Peer review 721:Fish portal 536:copy edited 428:written in 374:Peer review 148:free images 31:not a forum 6761:Categories 6669:Very good! 5232:"Being an 3792:Cretolamna 2763:to the era 2655:What does 1542:Nikkimaria 1496:Nikkimaria 1475:Nikkimaria 256:identified 6712:WP:FAC/ar 6708:candidate 6539:and into 6316:Rhinopias 6272:Rhinopias 6216:Rhinopias 6155:Rhinopias 6113:Rhinopias 4594:thylacine 3610:coprolite 3443:Perfect! 3399:megalodon 2761:. Hazard 2740:OK · · · 2681:OK · · · 2634:OK · · · 2586:OK · · · 2399:Citations 2381:OK · · · 2311:refers to 2223:OK · · · 2197:What are 2153:OK · · · 1883:OK · · · 1835:Phylogeny 1817:OK · · · 1682:megalodon 1653:Sections: 1316:Megalodon 984:Megalodon 936:|checked= 734:Fish taxa 486:is rated 247:Megalodon 88:if needed 71:Be polite 25:Megalodon 21:talk page 6730:Ian Rose 6706:: This 6288:Ref 80: 6270:Added – 6214:Added – 6062:removed 5722:FunkMonk 5705:FunkMonk 5590:FunkMonk 5521:removed 5197:FunkMonk 4902:removed 4804:FunkMonk 4709:removed 4675:FunkMonk 4596:is used. 4313:FunkMonk 4243:removed 4093:FunkMonk 4034:FunkMonk 3966:FunkMonk 3880:FunkMonk 3733:There's 3662:FunkMonk 3567:FunkMonk 3538:FunkMonk 3504:FunkMonk 3445:FunkMonk 3414:FunkMonk 3297:FunkMonk 3267:FunkMonk 3170:FunkMonk 3108:FunkMonk 2840:Comments 2702:I think 2132:pig-eyed 1868:sharks" 1359:Comments 1297:Ian Rose 1293:promoted 1230:FunkMonk 1189:FunkMonk 1131:FunkMonk 1094:FunkMonk 1075:Thanks, 958:contribs 488:FA-class 443:traveled 398:Promoted 379:Reviewed 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 6299:It is? 5718:Support 3828:meaning 3407:species 3084:Support 2793:the era 2789:hazard 2307:meaning 2255:oceans? 2175:Anatomy 1027:history 1008:history 994:Article 881:on the 776:on the 665:on the 540:Corinne 439:defense 300:Process 207:30 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 6623:RL0919 6598:RL0919 6583:RL0919 6561:RL0919 6519:RL0919 6092:fixed 6003:added 5632:fixed 5547:fixed 5469:fixed 5417:fixed 5391:added 5325:fixed 5299:added 5273:fixed 5247:fixed 5209:fixed 5128:fixed 5047:fixed 4994:fixed 4968:fixed 4942:fixed 4846:fixed 4572:fixed 4543:fixed 4517:fixed 4487:added 4342:fixed 4191:fixed 4135:added 3922:added 3796:Otodus 3674:fixed 3645:fixed 3579:added 3496:these: 3426:fixed 2904:fixed 2877:RL0919 2666:fixed 2607:-: --> 2366:fixed 1981:fixed 1401:added 1301:FACBot 921:, and 854:Sharks 845:sharks 801:Sharks 749:Fishes 690:Fishes 494:scale. 322:Listed 303:Result 126:Google 6181:added 5684:done 5443:done 5365:done 5351:fixed 5154:done 4867:means 4603:done 4461:done 4285:Many 4217:done 3991:done 3837:done 3403:genus 3378:done 3212:done 3051:done 2991:done 2704:house 2619:done 2610:known 2571:done 1205:done 1060:This 1036:Watch 475:This 435:color 249:is a 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 6734:talk 6694:talk 6659:talk 6627:talk 6604:have 6587:talk 6523:talk 6406:talk 6337:talk 6320:talk 6276:talk 6234:talk 6220:talk 6173:talk 6159:talk 6117:talk 6111:) – 6109:here 6054:talk 5995:talk 5932:talk 5897:talk 5811:talk 5769:talk 5726:talk 5709:talk 5594:talk 5201:talk 4808:talk 4679:talk 4317:talk 4097:talk 4038:talk 3970:talk 3884:talk 3817:talk 3735:this 3722:talk 3666:talk 3571:talk 3542:talk 3508:talk 3449:talk 3418:talk 3301:talk 3271:talk 3174:talk 3112:talk 3092:talk 3075:talk 2930:talk 2881:talk 1658:Lead 1546:talk 1500:talk 1305:talk 1299:via 1234:talk 1193:talk 1135:talk 1098:talk 1023:edit 1000:edit 952:talk 768:High 657:High 360:Kept 341:Kept 297:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 6726:bot 6690:OJJ 6501:)." 1295:by 873:Top 538:by 176:TWL 6763:: 6736:) 6722:}} 6716:{{ 6696:) 6684:, 6661:) 6629:) 6589:) 6525:) 6408:) 6339:) 6322:) 6278:) 6236:) 6222:) 6175:) 6161:) 6119:) 6056:) 5997:) 5934:) 5899:) 5813:) 5771:) 5728:) 5711:) 5596:) 5203:) 4810:) 4681:) 4319:) 4099:) 4040:) 3972:) 3886:) 3819:) 3724:) 3668:) 3573:) 3556:: 3544:) 3510:) 3451:) 3420:) 3303:) 3273:) 3259:: 3176:) 3114:) 3094:) 3077:) 2932:) 2883:) 2832:: 2813:: 2801:: 2791:of 2746:: 2716:: 2687:: 2640:: 2592:: 2540:: 2499:: 2387:: 2331:: 2319:: 2284:: 2229:: 2159:: 2085:: 2058:: 2043:of 2003:: 1955:: 1889:: 1823:: 1779:: 1736:: 1716:: 1704:: 1645:: 1633:: 1617:: 1602:: 1578:: 1548:) 1514:: 1502:) 1483:: 1422:: 1310:. 1276:. 1265:FA 1236:) 1195:) 1137:) 1100:) 1040:• 1025:| 1006:| 1002:| 931:. 925:. 917:, 441:, 437:, 205:: 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 6732:( 6692:( 6678:: 6674:@ 6657:( 6625:( 6611:| 6600:: 6596:@ 6585:( 6571:| 6563:: 6559:@ 6548:| 6521:( 6455:| 6440:| 6423:| 6404:( 6370:| 6355:| 6335:( 6318:( 6304:| 6274:( 6260:| 6232:( 6218:( 6204:| 6171:( 6157:( 6142:| 6115:( 6097:| 6067:| 6052:( 6038:| 6008:| 5993:( 5979:| 5945:| 5930:( 5915:| 5895:( 5880:| 5854:| 5824:| 5809:( 5795:| 5767:( 5753:| 5724:( 5707:( 5689:| 5663:| 5637:| 5607:| 5592:( 5578:| 5552:| 5526:| 5500:| 5474:| 5448:| 5422:| 5396:| 5370:| 5330:| 5304:| 5278:| 5252:| 5214:| 5199:( 5185:| 5159:| 5133:| 5107:| 5081:| 5052:| 5026:| 4999:| 4973:| 4947:| 4907:| 4881:| 4851:| 4821:| 4806:( 4792:| 4766:| 4740:| 4714:| 4677:( 4660:| 4634:| 4608:| 4577:| 4548:| 4522:| 4492:| 4466:| 4440:| 4414:| 4388:| 4347:| 4333:a 4315:( 4301:| 4274:| 4248:| 4222:| 4196:| 4170:| 4140:| 4110:| 4095:( 4081:| 4051:| 4036:( 4022:| 3996:| 3968:( 3954:| 3927:| 3897:| 3882:( 3868:| 3842:| 3815:( 3746:| 3720:( 3679:| 3664:( 3650:| 3624:| 3584:| 3569:( 3540:( 3522:| 3506:( 3485:| 3447:( 3431:| 3416:( 3383:| 3356:| 3299:( 3284:| 3269:( 3243:| 3217:| 3187:| 3172:( 3158:| 3132:| 3110:( 3090:( 3073:( 3056:| 3028:| 3015:. 2996:| 2965:| 2946:| 2928:( 2909:| 2879:( 2861:| 2777:| 2765:? 2730:| 2671:| 2624:| 2576:| 2524:| 2513:: 2509:@ 2371:| 2295:| 2268:| 2213:| 2143:| 2119:| 2069:| 2031:| 2016:| 1986:| 1939:| 1921:| 1873:| 1807:| 1763:| 1751:? 1688:| 1562:| 1544:( 1526:| 1498:( 1406:| 1347:| 1329:| 1303:( 1251:| 1232:( 1210:| 1191:( 1166:| 1151:| 1133:( 1116:| 1096:( 1080:| 1032:· 1029:) 1021:( 1013:· 1010:) 998:( 964:) 955:· 950:( 885:. 780:. 746:. 669:. 500:. 457:. 267:. 199:3 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index