Knowledge

Talk:Nokia E52/E55

Source 📝

186: 168: 399:
wish they'd fix all these issues because it's stopping me from buying this phone, which I've been waiting for since it was announced. None of this changes the fact that the Controversy section in its current form does not belong on Knowledge (IMO), and my above arguments still stand. Knowledge shouldn't be used as a soapbox or backup repository for support issues. If this is what is desired, either make a new website, or find an existing website devoted to this purpose. I'm not going to bother trying to remove this section again, as I'm sure it will become irrelevant as the issues are either addressed or the product becomes obsolete. (I also apologize if my posts sound arrogant in any way. I'm trying to be objective.)
88: 70: 271: 250: 416:
not imagine that Nokia would not have been addressed publicly in various newspapers if the claims hold true. I would be able to state, that in my version with my firmware none of the problems occur and that I am very happy with it. My E75 that I had before got destroyed by a person who thought that it had a touchscreen. I am not an employee of Nokia and I was especially annoyed when they closed a factory in Germany. But the product itself is ok.
281: 39: 325: 98: 381:
Generally speaking, information of this sort should not be included in an encyclopedia until it is well-established fact, which for consumer products, tends to require at least a few years of consumer experience, not a few months which is how long this product has been available. Additionally, given
367:
It is composed entirely of unsupported and/or subjective claims, from the first sentence to the last. The first sentence states that this phone is "one of the most controversial Nokia phones" without any support. The next statement then introduces a list of "common" problems, without any indication
415:
I would support the opinion of the previous poster. I am amused that products are listed in Knowledge but I am not to argue about that. The section about the problems is meaningless. Actually I had bought the unit in November 2009 before I read about some of the problems in some user forums. I could
398:
I'm the same person who wrote the previous post and who removed the section recently. I notice that the section has been reinstated again, with an additional comment possibly insinuating that Nokia was responsible for its recent removal. I just want to clarify that I do not work for Nokia and I do
374:
After the list of problems, it is then claimed that "most" of them "should be fixed" in the first update. What does "should be fixed" mean? That there is a high probability that they will be fixed? That Nokia should fix them because their customers are very angry? To paraphrase a certain old
375:
Jedi: an update either fixes a problem or it doesn't, there is no "should". Which problems are going to be fixed, and how can we be sure that that constitutes "most" of them? Where are the citations to support any of this?
382:
the amount of press (and hence, general attention) these issues have received (which is little or none), it hardly merits its own section called "controversy". Merely known issues with an insufficiently tested product.
368:
what is meant by "common". How many posts in the support forums make a problem "common" as opposed to "rare"? Is there any official or expert confirmation that a particular problem is "common"?
465: 144: 150: 185: 167: 460: 120: 475: 226: 490: 342: 332: 111: 75: 232: 495: 485: 402: 385: 480: 470: 417: 371:
The list of problems is a vague list of anecdotal problems, and as with everything else in this section, unsupported by any citations.
437: 303: 202: 364:
Given that this section has already been removed and reinstated once, I am going to try to explain my problems with this section.
294: 255: 193: 173: 50: 406: 389: 103: 38: 421: 87: 69: 441: 430:
Ngage games activation was crippled by Nokia in E52 via Firmware Update 51. Thye have not yet fixed it.
56: 433: 302:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
201:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
119:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
116: 270: 249: 286: 17: 454: 378:
The last sentence is wholly speculation and it even declares itself as speculative.
276: 93: 23: 324: 299: 445: 425: 410: 393: 198: 32: 298:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 197:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 115:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 231:This article has not yet received a rating on the 149:This article has not yet received a rating on the 466:Unknown-importance Telecommunications articles 8: 36: 244: 162: 64: 129:Knowledge:WikiProject Telecommunications 461:Start-Class Telecommunications articles 246: 164: 132:Template:WikiProject Telecommunications 66: 7: 292:This article is within the scope of 191:This article is within the scope of 109:This article is within the scope of 55:It is of interest to the following 476:Unknown-importance Brands articles 31: 323: 279: 269: 248: 184: 166: 96: 86: 68: 37: 491:Low-importance Finland articles 337:This article has been rated as 112:WikiProject Telecommunications 1: 496:All WikiProject Finland pages 426:12:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC) 312:Knowledge:WikiProject Finland 306:and see a list of open tasks. 205:and see a list of open tasks. 123:and see a list of open tasks. 486:Start-Class Finland articles 411:09:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC) 394:09:41, 4 November 2009 (UTC) 315:Template:WikiProject Finland 211:Knowledge:WikiProject Brands 481:WikiProject Brands articles 471:Start-Class Brands articles 214:Template:WikiProject Brands 135:Telecommunications articles 512: 343:project's importance scale 233:project's importance scale 151:project's importance scale 336: 264: 230: 179: 148: 81: 63: 446:06:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 104:Telecommunication portal 45:This article is rated 295:WikiProject Finland 194:WikiProject Brands 126:Telecommunications 117:Telecommunications 76:Telecommunications 51:content assessment 436:comment added by 357: 356: 353: 352: 349: 348: 243: 242: 239: 238: 161: 160: 157: 156: 22:(Redirected from 503: 448: 327: 320: 319: 318:Finland articles 316: 313: 310: 289: 284: 283: 282: 273: 266: 265: 260: 252: 245: 219: 218: 215: 212: 209: 188: 181: 180: 170: 163: 137: 136: 133: 130: 127: 106: 101: 100: 99: 90: 83: 82: 72: 65: 48: 42: 41: 33: 27: 511: 510: 506: 505: 504: 502: 501: 500: 451: 450: 431: 403:203.126.130.140 386:203.126.130.140 362: 317: 314: 311: 308: 307: 285: 280: 278: 258: 217:Brands articles 216: 213: 210: 207: 206: 134: 131: 128: 125: 124: 102: 97: 95: 49:on Knowledge's 46: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 509: 507: 499: 498: 493: 488: 483: 478: 473: 468: 463: 453: 452: 361: 358: 355: 354: 351: 350: 347: 346: 339:Low-importance 335: 329: 328: 321: 304:the discussion 291: 290: 287:Finland portal 274: 262: 261: 259:Low‑importance 253: 241: 240: 237: 236: 229: 223: 222: 220: 203:the discussion 189: 177: 176: 171: 159: 158: 155: 154: 147: 141: 140: 138: 121:the discussion 108: 107: 91: 79: 78: 73: 61: 60: 54: 43: 30: 24:Talk:Nokia E52 18:Talk:Nokia E52 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 508: 497: 494: 492: 489: 487: 484: 482: 479: 477: 474: 472: 469: 467: 464: 462: 459: 458: 456: 449: 447: 443: 439: 435: 428: 427: 423: 419: 418:84.119.86.108 413: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 376: 372: 369: 365: 359: 344: 340: 334: 331: 330: 326: 322: 305: 301: 297: 296: 288: 277: 275: 272: 268: 267: 263: 257: 254: 251: 247: 234: 228: 225: 224: 221: 204: 200: 196: 195: 190: 187: 183: 182: 178: 175: 172: 169: 165: 152: 146: 143: 142: 139: 122: 118: 114: 113: 105: 94: 92: 89: 85: 84: 80: 77: 74: 71: 67: 62: 58: 52: 44: 40: 35: 34: 25: 19: 438:86.96.226.15 432:— Preceding 429: 414: 401: 397: 384: 380: 377: 373: 370: 366: 363: 338: 293: 192: 110: 57:WikiProjects 360:Controversy 47:Start-class 455:Categories 434:unsigned 341:on the 309:Finland 300:Finland 256:Finland 208:Brands 199:brands 174:Brands 53:scale. 16:< 442:talk 422:talk 407:talk 390:talk 333:Low 227:??? 145:??? 457:: 444:) 424:) 409:) 392:) 440:( 420:( 405:( 388:( 345:. 235:. 153:. 59:: 26:)

Index

Talk:Nokia E52
Talk:Nokia E52

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Telecommunications
WikiProject icon
Telecommunication portal
WikiProject Telecommunications
Telecommunications
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Brands
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Brands
brands
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Finland
WikiProject icon
Finland portal
WikiProject Finland
Finland
the discussion
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.