155:
71:
131:
53:
165:
22:
227:
749:
have legislative capacity by the very definition of their name, otherwise they are no legislatures. I am not sure whether it is true, but maybe there are elected parliaments who have no legislative capacity, maybe the parliaments have only advisory capacity, and maybe the monarchs or their cabinets
370:
It does raise an interesting question about systems that are structurally non-partisan, but in practice are implemented in partisan ways. The US Presidency is (or was) structurally non-partisan. However, over time, it has evolved (devolved?) into a highly partisan office. We should try to find a
330:
While this is true, it needs to be balanced, I'd rather move things into the text, so that the advantages and disadvantages are made clear in prose. This is more in line with Jimmy Wales' preferences for article formation anyway. No advantage or disadvantage should be highlighted or hidden by this
466:
This article needs a copy-editor for cleanup. Several places say "nonpartisan" (without a dash) and other places say "non-partisan" (with a dash). Let's make that consistently say "nonpartisan" since "nonpartisan" is an entire legal word unto itself and is not a double-word which needs a dash to
282:
I think some residents of those states got a little overzealous. I've never been affiliated with a party and I've lived in Alaska, Oregon, and
Massachusetts, all of which allow this as an option. I also know from friends from North Dakota, Montana, Colorado, Nevada, New Hampshire, and Maine that
366:
runs candidates. To my understanding they do not do so officially, in that parties have no recognition in the system of government, acquire no funding, and are accorded no priviledge for having members elected. It might be fair to say it is informally partisan IF the council can be shown to be
283:
their states allows this. In fact, I've never heard of it not being allowed. If I had to guess, I'd say its the norm, but I'm not going to put that in there because I don't know. What I do know is that this is not limited to those to states and this paragraph misrepresents it as such. -Matt
611:
This article fails to provide a single source for the general usage of this term. The few sources provided has nothing to do with the term "non-partisan democracy". Even the wording of the description of the term in the introduction is nonsensical, and the article goes on to set up a number of
563:
wouldn't they techincally be non partision in nature? as they have banned all political parties, and their only party essenturally becomes the goverment? Such examples would be the USSR, other communist states, maybe even Lybia, and
380:
What does "official recognition of parties" mean? Public funding of parties or lack of legally enforcible party discipline are very common in democratic representation systems, either partisan or non-partisan.
744:
The sentence "De jure nonpartisan systems exist in several
Persian Gulf states, including Oman and Kuwait; the legislatures in these governments typically have advisory capacity only,..." is a paradox.
493:
I don't think the NGO part under
Examples really fits in. It's not an NGO, it's the leadership of a sect - there is not parties or politics in that. It's a bad example and therefore should be removed.
406:
The article says, "The system works with first past the post but is incompatible with proportional representation systems." I think, this is not correct. Voting could be by means of the
786:
781:
806:
241:
236:
141:
96:
78:
58:
811:
686:
682:
668:
271:
are not required to state an affiliation for a political party when registering to vote - unlike most states which require residents to specify whether they are
796:
211:
515:
I don't think the Bahai example fits either. This page is about political parties, rather than factions within a religion. Let's remove the Bahai example.
612:
fictional scenarios, as a kind of evidence for the existence of this term, without any sources provided as to when these scenarios are supposed to occur.
801:
217:
413:
816:
425:
501:
290:
187:
791:
565:
664:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
522:
474:
276:
272:
654:
549:
363:
178:
136:
371:
way to represent de-jure and de-facto partisanship in some way that is still NPOV. I'm really unclear on how to do this. --
367:
exercising block-voting or other practices of party-discipline. However, I'm not aware of this and it should be cited.
309:
I think the article in general is fine, but we may need a 'criticism' or 'disadvantages' section in order to balance it.
763:
755:
729:
33:
615:
This article is pure trash and is either a deliberate hoax or someones fixed ideas in the form of original research. --
442:
372:
332:
421:
384:
Democratic systems keep parties away from power - except elections. Parties excercising power are state-parties.
685:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
545:
407:
505:
294:
759:
751:
720:
646:
642:
638:
569:
704:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
692:
39:
645:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
441:
I'm going to start adding references and cleaning up. The article isn't in good shape as it stands. --
319:
620:
526:
518:
497:
478:
470:
417:
286:
21:
186:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
541:"Several countries with partisan parliaments use nonpartisan appointments to choose presidents."
689:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
583:
The article is practically unsourced! Selection of examples is random and concepts are unclear.
705:
348:
The Isle of Man and the
Channel Islands operate a system very close to a non partisan system.--
82:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
655:
https://web.archive.org/web/20040811164634/http://www.unicam.state.ne.us/learning/history.htm
594:
392:
90:
712:
616:
456:
349:
170:
671:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
758:) 08:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC) This may be non-partisan, but this is not democracy. --
711:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
164:
154:
130:
70:
52:
775:
658:
530:
509:
310:
767:
734:
624:
598:
573:
553:
482:
460:
445:
429:
410:
which requires no parties while at the same time it delivers proportional result.
396:
375:
352:
335:
322:
313:
298:
746:
678:
590:
388:
677:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
452:
160:
94:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
268:
264:
183:
84:
537:
several countries.. nonpartisan appoinments for presidents.... examples?
226:
15:
362:
An anon just deleted
Toronto from the examples, because the
225:
451:
It has been a while, and the article sorely lacks sources.
649:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
182:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
681:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
331:
process. Merely it should improve article flow. --
659:http://www.unicam.state.ne.us/learning/history.htm
216:This article has not yet received a rating on the
106:Knowledge:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
787:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
667:This message was posted before February 2018.
109:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
263:I took this out: "Residents of the states of
8:
782:C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
637:I have just modified one external link on
125:
47:
807:Top-importance political party articles
127:
49:
19:
812:Political parties task force articles
79:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
7:
797:Unknown-importance politics articles
586:Some serious sources are necessary.
176:This article is within the scope of
76:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
112:Elections and Referendums articles
14:
750:have the legislative capacity. --
641:. Please take a moment to review
802:C-Class political party articles
163:
153:
129:
69:
51:
20:
544:Are there examples for this?--
364:New Democratic Party of Canada
196:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
817:WikiProject Politics articles
735:19:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
574:07:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
559:so called popular democracies
461:16:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
299:21:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
234:This article is supported by
199:Template:WikiProject Politics
190:and see a list of open tasks.
768:08:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
599:07:19, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
531:18:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
483:18:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
397:07:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
237:Political parties task force
625:00:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
446:21:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
402:proportional representation
336:21:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
833:
698:(last update: 5 June 2024)
634:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
554:12:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
218:project's importance scale
792:C-Class politics articles
430:15:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
376:19:18, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
353:13:10, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
323:08:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
314:03:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
233:
215:
148:
103:Elections and Referendums
64:
59:Elections and Referendums
46:
740:A contradictory sentence
510:09:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
467:combine them together.
408:Single Transferable Vote
630:External links modified
443:Christian Edward Gruber
437:Cleanup and referencing
373:Christian Edward Gruber
333:Christian Edward Gruber
639:Non-partisan democracy
230:
28:This article is rated
546:CoincidentalBystander
416:comment was added by
279:, or another party."
259:Michigan and Virginia
229:
679:regular verification
179:WikiProject Politics
669:After February 2018
723:InternetArchiveBot
674:InternetArchiveBot
231:
34:content assessment
699:
521:comment added by
500:comment added by
473:comment added by
459:
433:
289:comment added by
256:
255:
252:
251:
248:
247:
202:politics articles
142:Political parties
124:
123:
120:
119:
824:
733:
724:
697:
696:
675:
607:Nonsense article
533:
512:
489:Examples - NGO's
485:
455:
411:
305:All pro, no con?
301:
204:
203:
200:
197:
194:
173:
168:
167:
157:
150:
149:
144:
133:
126:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
97:our project page
91:electoral reform
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
832:
831:
827:
826:
825:
823:
822:
821:
772:
771:
760:Himbeerbläuling
752:Himbeerbläuling
742:
727:
722:
690:
683:have permission
673:
647:this simple FaQ
632:
609:
581:
561:
539:
516:
495:
491:
488:
468:
439:
418:Martinwilke1980
412:âThe preceding
404:
360:
346:
307:
284:
261:
201:
198:
195:
192:
191:
171:Politics portal
169:
162:
139:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
830:
828:
820:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
774:
773:
741:
738:
717:
716:
709:
662:
661:
653:Added archive
631:
628:
608:
605:
603:
580:
577:
560:
557:
538:
535:
502:82.201.206.171
490:
487:
464:
463:
438:
435:
403:
400:
359:
356:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
306:
303:
260:
257:
254:
253:
250:
249:
246:
245:
242:Top-importance
232:
222:
221:
214:
208:
207:
205:
188:the discussion
175:
174:
158:
146:
145:
134:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
829:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
779:
777:
770:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
748:
739:
737:
736:
731:
726:
725:
714:
710:
707:
703:
702:
701:
694:
688:
684:
680:
676:
670:
665:
660:
656:
652:
651:
650:
648:
644:
640:
635:
629:
627:
626:
622:
618:
613:
606:
604:
601:
600:
596:
592:
587:
584:
578:
576:
575:
571:
567:
558:
556:
555:
551:
547:
542:
536:
534:
532:
528:
524:
520:
513:
511:
507:
503:
499:
486:
484:
480:
476:
472:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
436:
434:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
409:
401:
399:
398:
394:
390:
385:
382:
378:
377:
374:
368:
365:
357:
355:
354:
351:
343:
337:
334:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
316:
315:
312:
304:
302:
300:
296:
292:
291:76.119.33.197
288:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
258:
243:
240:(assessed as
239:
238:
228:
224:
223:
219:
213:
210:
209:
206:
189:
185:
181:
180:
172:
166:
161:
159:
156:
152:
151:
147:
143:
138:
135:
132:
128:
116:
99:
98:
93:
92:
87:
86:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
747:Legislatures
743:
721:
718:
693:source check
672:
666:
663:
636:
633:
614:
610:
602:
588:
585:
582:
579:POV, sources
566:184.77.10.72
562:
543:
540:
514:
492:
465:
440:
405:
386:
383:
379:
369:
361:
347:
317:
308:
281:
262:
235:
177:
95:
89:
83:
77:
40:WikiProjects
517:âPreceding
496:âPreceding
469:âPreceding
344:Microstates
320:Countakeshi
285:âPreceding
776:Categories
730:Report bug
617:Saddhiyama
523:24.4.147.8
475:24.4.147.8
350:Darrelljon
273:Republican
713:this tool
706:this tool
564:others.--
453:â jossi â
85:elections
719:Cheers.â
519:unsigned
498:unsigned
471:unsigned
426:contribs
414:unsigned
318:Done. --
287:unsigned
277:Democrat
269:Virginia
265:Michigan
193:Politics
184:politics
137:Politics
643:my edit
358:Toronto
311:E.Cogoy
30:C-class
591:peyerk
457:(talk)
389:peyerk
36:scale.
764:talk
756:talk
621:talk
595:talk
570:talk
550:talk
527:talk
506:talk
479:talk
422:talk
393:talk
295:talk
267:and
687:RfC
657:to
212:???
778::
766:)
700:.
695:}}
691:{{
623:)
597:)
589:--
572:)
552:)
529:)
508:)
481:)
428:)
424:â˘
395:)
387:--
297:)
275:,
244:).
140::
88:,
762:(
754:(
732:)
728:(
715:.
708:.
619:(
593:(
568:(
548:(
525:(
504:(
477:(
432:.
420:(
391:(
293:(
220:.
100:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
