452:
31:
442:
421:
890:"Herenigde Nasionale Party" and "New National Party" look as though they were just rebrandings rather than formally different bodies, though I acknowledge that historically a lot of parties in the Commonwealth were not arranged in a way that makes this an easy distinction. It seems logical to have a single article on the party (with maybe break-outs for individual sections of the history if it gets too long), not multiple articles saying different things.
317:
290:
92:
186:
162:
327:
196:
629:
82:
64:
22:
819:. Should the latter be considered a direct continuation of the National Party or as a new party? The fact that there exists two articles suggests that it is two different parties, but the article about the National Party said that this party was disbanded in 2005, suggesting that the New National Party is a direct continuation. This is a bit confusing to me. --
393:
258:
1052:"During the 1980s the South African government converted from a policy of heavy state intervention in the economy to the new faith in private enterprise and the free market preached by international development agencies and increasingly by third world countries and formerly socialist ones. This newfound faith of the National Party was highly political."
886:
are inconsistent about whether the different names represent formally different parties or merely a single party that went through rebranding, especially when absorbing smaller groups. Curiously the 1934 split (where there is scope for debate over whether the continuity flows into the United Party or
1134:
Someone keeps removing material in the table describing the details of the party that says that the party ended its support for apartheid in the early 1990s. The article fully acknowledges that the party supported apartheid for many years, however it is very dishonest to remove all mention from the
950:
included in the
National Party than blacks. If it is disagreeable to remove White Supremacy then perhaps we could change it to anti-black, or something like that because that represents the true form of the national party. The national party would often include colored and Indians to keep control.
949:
I am suggesting this be removed as the party's political ideologies but I do not expect it to be removed. I base this on the fact the the
National Party was for the most part a union between "whites and colored" and that fact alone is not in keeping with "White Supremacy". Also, Indians were more
974:
You are joking, aren't you? The
National Party was expressly dedicated to a whites-only system of government. Not only that, but *every single prime minister and president* of South Africa prior to De Klerk had been involved with (and almost without exception, convicted for being involved with)
1055:"As the 1980s ripened, the "solutions" to be offered by the market became more attractive to Ă©lites, and the ruling National Party appeared willing to jettison its traditional national social baggage almost in direct proportion to the ANC's continuing embrace of communism."
678:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
734:
Not yet... at the moment the so-called "relaunch" sounds like not much more than a publicity stunt, and I'm not even sure it deserves a mention as a footnote on the page about the NP. However, time will tell whether the new party proves notable or not.
35:
928:
into this article because in this case it really was just a rebranding in a (rather weak) attempt to distance itself from it's own
Apartheid past. The rebranding had no significant effect on the organisational structure of the party.
1247:
1049:"The National Party (NP) had characterised itself as the party of law and order, supporting a free market economy and being committed to a non-racial democracy in which minority and cultural rights would be protected."
1162:
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding, I did not remove anything nor contribute anything to the ideology section, i just corrected the flag size and then all of a sudden, you accused my edit as "Vandalism", Please see
1237:
1252:
1167:), it's quite far isnt it? ,also it might have been some other editors before me who edited it and i didnt look carefully enough, in a sense, it is my fault for not correcting it respectivelly.
675:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
402:
300:
537:
That was my first though. In fact, i was about to redirect there until i saw the line above and realised it may get controversial. Time will tell how it should best be handled
1317:
1262:
1199:
I did not know what is the reason for you to take back your statement, but i think it is best to keep it here. anyhow there is no point on discussing this even further.
138:
887:
remains with Malan's rump, and for that matter whether
Hertzog unmerged out of the United Party in 1939 or was just a breakaway) hasn't yet spawned confusing articles.
1312:
1287:
272:
267:
172:
924:
on the grounds that it was created by an actual change in the organisation and structure in that two separate organisations merged to create it. I Support merging
1292:
1307:
1277:
383:
373:
242:
144:
593:
for another party that claims to be a continuation of one that went into a merger, but is legally a different entity. Is it really fair to say there was a
1322:
1267:
656:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
1282:
1232:
248:
763:
Sure, but anyone can create a website and register with the IEC. It doesn't prove they are a significant party deserving their own article... yet.
1332:
1242:
653:
508:
498:
349:
114:
1302:
1297:
1257:
680:
672:
668:
645:
1337:
976:
782:
1108:
957:
684:
218:
1272:
1031:
340:
295:
105:
69:
883:
816:
723:
474:
785:
article. They seem to have gone through some leadership squabbles, but still have candidates registered for the 2011 elections. —
1327:
1227:
589:
with the party dividing at one stage with what is effectively a breakaway rump carrying on the name into later years. See also
209:
167:
1119:
1204:
1172:
1013:
465:
426:
44:
549:
Smuts' party was originally the SAP then it merged with the original NP, and this was called the United Party, or 'UP'
778:
1080:
1039:
1017:
895:
921:
913:
879:
1200:
1182:
1168:
694:
590:
980:
961:
664:
636:
1185:
ok i understand, sorry this was a misunderstanding, i must have confused someone else user edit with yours
1097:
1190:
1148:
1035:
1130:
Please STOP removing info that the party abandoned its previous support for apartheid in the early 1990s
891:
754:
719:
598:
50:
1109:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gzLS7H3AHNAC&pg=PA143&lpg=PA143#v=onepage&q&f=false
1027:
1001:
953:
711:
1072:
708:
Should we start a new article for the
National Party which relaunched itself on the 5 August 2008?
640:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
21:
1076:
824:
690:
553:
332:
97:
1005:
574:
550:
473:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
348:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
217:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
113:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
934:
925:
917:
863:
838:
641:
441:
420:
546:
Sources on the Internet claim that it was the "South African Party", and not the Labour party.
1186:
1159:
1144:
1009:
614:
Why isn't J.B.M. Hertzog listed as a leader of the National Party? Please correct the list. --
841:
article to be anything but a redirect to this one. I support a merge of the two articles. —
1164:
1068:
750:
715:
1208:
1194:
1176:
1152:
984:
965:
938:
899:
867:
850:
828:
794:
772:
758:
744:
727:
698:
618:
601:
567:
846:
790:
768:
740:
201:
1120:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2kzgtyNPPiMC&pg=PA20#v=onepage&q&f=false
1060:
820:
564:
628:
195:
185:
161:
1221:
930:
859:
457:
316:
289:
657:
615:
345:
110:
586:
1064:
858:
They were the same party, and their history under the rebranded name was brief.
597:
National Party from 1914-2005 or was the 1934 entity a new party of refuseniks?
842:
786:
764:
749:
Please check their website out, they were registered with the IEC a week ago.
736:
447:
322:
191:
87:
81:
63:
1143:
Maoowwuuurunwuuuzhe, why are you removing white supremacy as an ideology?
214:
1098:
http://www.sahistory.org.za/article/south-african-general-elections-1994
392:
563:
The name of the party was "National Party" not "Nationalist Party". ďż˝
470:
257:
1135:
table that the party abandoned support of apartheid in early 90s.
912:
second proposal. This is two separate proposals to merge (1) the
997:
I can't find anywhere what the party's economic policies were.
812:
1248:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
575:
http://www.southafrica-newyork.net/consulate/images/nnplogo.gif
811:
According to this article the National Party was disbanded in
781:(their registered name) probably to resolve a redlink the the
530:
Should this page be merged with the New National Party Page?
15:
627:
391:
256:
652:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1238:
Knowledge vital articles in Society and social sciences
533:
I suppose that depends on how "new" the NNP really is.
1253:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
975:
pro-nazi activities, including murder, during WWII.
469:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
344:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
213:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
109:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
683:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
247:This article has not yet received a rating on the
143:This article has not yet received a rating on the
815:, but then there is another article about the
624:Fair use rationale for Image:NPsouthafrica.jpg
8:
777:A new article was created a while ago under
993:What were the party's stances on economics?
1318:South African politics task force articles
1025:
415:
284:
156:
58:
1263:Unknown-importance Conservatism articles
837:There is, indeed, little reason for the
573:A picture of the logo can be found at :
1313:C-Class South African politics articles
1288:Mid-importance political party articles
1090:
1059:It seems that the party was originally
417:
286:
158:
60:
19:
673:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
1293:Political parties task force articles
992:
403:the South African politics task force
7:
1308:Top-importance South Africa articles
1278:Unknown-importance politics articles
1071:policy during the 1980s and 1990s.--
920:into this article. I Oppose merging
783:South African general election, 2009
463:This article is within the scope of
338:This article is within the scope of
207:This article is within the scope of
103:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
585:This looks a similar situation to
542:What was the name of Smuts' party?
358:Knowledge:WikiProject South Africa
123:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism
14:
1323:WikiProject South Africa articles
1268:WikiProject Conservatism articles
884:New National Party (South Africa)
361:Template:WikiProject South Africa
126:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
1283:C-Class political party articles
1233:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1045:Here are some relevant sources:
671:. Using one of the templates at
450:
440:
419:
325:
315:
288:
194:
184:
160:
90:
80:
62:
29:
20:
503:This article has been rated as
378:This article has been rated as
1333:Top-importance Africa articles
1243:C-Class level-5 vital articles
685:Media copyright questions page
227:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
1303:C-Class South Africa articles
1298:WikiProject Politics articles
1258:C-Class Conservatism articles
1195:17:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
1153:15:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
829:14:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
773:14:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
759:14:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
704:THE PARTY HAS BEEN RELAUNCHED
654:boilerplate fair use template
477:and see a list of open tasks.
400:This article is supported by
352:and see a list of open tasks.
265:This article is supported by
230:Template:WikiProject Politics
221:and see a list of open tasks.
117:and see a list of open tasks.
1024:This interests me as well.
1018:02:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
681:criteria for speedy deletion
483:Knowledge:WikiProject Africa
268:Political parties task force
1338:WikiProject Africa articles
1209:10:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
1177:10:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
779:National Party South Africa
745:19:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
728:15:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
699:23:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
486:Template:WikiProject Africa
1354:
1081:19:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
966:19:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
939:07:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
868:21:21, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
851:19:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
795:19:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
665:the image description page
602:11:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
568:22:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
509:project's importance scale
384:project's importance scale
249:project's importance scale
145:project's importance scale
1273:C-Class politics articles
1139:White Supremacy Removed ?
922:Herenigde Nasionale Party
914:Herenigde Nasionale Party
900:20:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
880:Herenigde Nasionale Party
667:and edit it to include a
619:20:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
554:16:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
502:
435:
399:
377:
310:
264:
246:
179:
142:
75:
57:
1040:20:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
878:Currently this article,
646:explanation or rationale
591:Liberal Party (UK, 1989)
341:WikiProject South Africa
106:WikiProject Conservatism
1328:C-Class Africa articles
985:13:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
637:Image:NPsouthafrica.jpg
1228:C-Class vital articles
632:
396:
261:
1067:, but adopted a more
648:as to why its use in
631:
541:
395:
364:South Africa articles
260:
129:Conservatism articles
36:level-5 vital article
210:WikiProject Politics
333:South Africa portal
98:Conservatism portal
926:New National Party
918:New National Party
839:New National Party
817:New National Party
669:fair use rationale
633:
466:WikiProject Africa
397:
262:
45:content assessment
1042:
1030:comment added by
1021:
1004:comment added by
956:comment added by
730:
714:comment added by
581:One party or more
523:
522:
519:
518:
515:
514:
414:
413:
410:
409:
283:
282:
279:
278:
233:politics articles
173:Political parties
155:
154:
151:
150:
1345:
1122:
1117:
1111:
1106:
1100:
1095:
1069:economic liberal
1020:
998:
968:
908:first proposal.
892:Timrollpickering
709:
644:but there is no
599:Timrollpickering
491:
490:
487:
484:
481:
460:
455:
454:
453:
444:
437:
436:
431:
423:
416:
366:
365:
362:
359:
356:
335:
330:
329:
328:
319:
312:
311:
306:
303:
292:
285:
235:
234:
231:
228:
225:
204:
199:
198:
188:
181:
180:
175:
164:
157:
131:
130:
127:
124:
121:
100:
95:
94:
93:
84:
77:
76:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1218:
1217:
1141:
1132:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1118:
1114:
1107:
1103:
1096:
1092:
999:
995:
951:
947:
945:White Supremacy
876:
874:Merger proposal
809:
807:The same party?
706:
626:
612:
583:
561:
544:
528:
489:Africa articles
488:
485:
482:
479:
478:
456:
451:
449:
429:
363:
360:
357:
354:
353:
331:
326:
324:
304:
298:
232:
229:
226:
223:
222:
202:Politics portal
200:
193:
170:
128:
125:
122:
119:
118:
96:
91:
89:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1351:
1349:
1341:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1140:
1137:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1112:
1101:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1061:third position
1057:
1056:
1053:
1050:
994:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
977:82.176.204.198
946:
943:
942:
941:
875:
872:
871:
870:
853:
808:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
705:
702:
691:BetacommandBot
625:
622:
611:
608:
606:
582:
579:
578:
577:
560:
557:
543:
540:
539:
538:
527:
524:
521:
520:
517:
516:
513:
512:
505:Top-importance
501:
495:
494:
492:
475:the discussion
462:
461:
445:
433:
432:
430:Top‑importance
424:
412:
411:
408:
407:
398:
388:
387:
380:Top-importance
376:
370:
369:
367:
350:the discussion
337:
336:
320:
308:
307:
305:Top‑importance
293:
281:
280:
277:
276:
273:Mid-importance
263:
253:
252:
245:
239:
238:
236:
219:the discussion
206:
205:
189:
177:
176:
165:
153:
152:
149:
148:
141:
135:
134:
132:
115:the discussion
102:
101:
85:
73:
72:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1350:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1244:
1241:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1223:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1138:
1136:
1129:
1121:
1116:
1113:
1110:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1022:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
986:
982:
978:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
967:
963:
959:
958:98.234.110.66
955:
944:
940:
936:
932:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
904:
903:
902:
901:
897:
893:
888:
885:
881:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
854:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
833:
832:
831:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
806:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:
760:
756:
752:
748:
747:
746:
742:
738:
733:
732:
731:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
703:
701:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:. Thank you.
686:
682:
676:
674:
670:
666:
663:Please go to
661:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:
630:
623:
621:
620:
617:
609:
607:
604:
603:
600:
596:
592:
588:
580:
576:
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
558:
556:
555:
552:
547:
536:
535:
534:
531:
525:
510:
506:
500:
497:
496:
493:
476:
472:
468:
467:
459:
458:Africa portal
448:
446:
443:
439:
438:
434:
428:
425:
422:
418:
405:
404:
394:
390:
389:
385:
381:
375:
372:
371:
368:
351:
347:
343:
342:
334:
323:
321:
318:
314:
313:
309:
302:
297:
294:
291:
287:
274:
271:(assessed as
270:
269:
259:
255:
254:
250:
244:
241:
240:
237:
220:
216:
212:
211:
203:
197:
192:
190:
187:
183:
182:
178:
174:
169:
166:
163:
159:
146:
140:
137:
136:
133:
116:
112:
108:
107:
99:
88:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1187:Gooduserdude
1160:Gooduserdude
1145:Gooduserdude
1142:
1133:
1115:
1104:
1093:
1085:
1058:
1044:
1032:2.104.112.41
1026:— Preceding
1023:
1000:— Preceding
996:
948:
916:and (2) the
909:
905:
889:
877:
855:
834:
810:
707:
689:
677:
662:
649:
635:
634:
613:
605:
594:
584:
562:
548:
545:
532:
529:
504:
464:
401:
379:
355:South Africa
346:South Africa
339:
296:South Africa
266:
208:
120:Conservatism
111:conservatism
104:
70:Conservatism
51:WikiProjects
34:
1065:corporatist
952:—Preceding
751:Wasabigreen
716:Wasabigreen
710:—Preceding
1222:Categories
1086:References
1165:WP:VANDAL
1073:Jay942942
821:Oddeivind
587:Sinn FĂ©in
565:Dr.Poison
39:is rated
1028:unsigned
1014:contribs
1002:unsigned
954:unsigned
860:Greenman
724:contribs
712:unsigned
658:fair use
642:fair use
526:Untitled
301:Politics
224:Politics
215:politics
168:Politics
1006:Fartnut
910:Support
856:Support
835:Support
616:Discott
610:Leaders
551:Shizzel
507:on the
382:on the
41:C-class
906:Oppose
595:single
480:Africa
471:Africa
427:Africa
47:scale.
931:Roger
843:Gk sa
787:Gk sa
765:Zaian
737:Zaian
28:This
1205:talk
1201:東霄長熊
1191:talk
1183:東霄長熊
1173:talk
1169:東霄長熊
1149:talk
1077:talk
1063:and
1036:talk
1010:talk
981:talk
962:talk
935:talk
896:talk
882:and
864:talk
847:talk
825:talk
813:2005
791:talk
769:talk
755:talk
741:talk
720:talk
695:talk
650:this
559:Name
499:Top
374:Top
243:???
139:???
1224::
1207:)
1193:)
1175:)
1151:)
1079:)
1038:)
1016:)
1012:•
983:)
964:)
937:)
898:)
866:)
849:)
827:)
793:)
771:)
757:)
743:)
726:)
722:•
697:)
660:.
299::
275:).
171::
1203:(
1189:(
1181:@
1171:(
1163:(
1158:@
1147:(
1075:(
1034:(
1008:(
979:(
960:(
933:(
894:(
862:(
845:(
823:(
789:(
767:(
753:(
739:(
718:(
693:(
511:.
406:.
386:.
251:.
147:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
