3013:"Socialism is an ideology with the core belief that a society should exist in which popular collectives control the means of power, and therefore the means of production. In application, however, the de facto meaning of socialism has changed with time. Although it is a politically-loaded term, it remains strongly-related to the establishment of an organized working class; created through either revolution or by social evolution, with the purpose of building a classless society. Socialism had its origins in the ideals of the Enlightenment, during the Industrial Age/Age of Industrialization, amid yearnings for a more egalitarian society. It has also increasingly become concentrated on social reforms within modern democracies. This concept and the term Socialist may refer to a group of ideologies, an economic system, or a state that exists or has existed." The definition of Socialism given by the Knowledge article of what Socialism is. If we accept this to be true then National Socialism is NOT socialism. Nowhere in Nazism is there a belief society should exist with popular collectives controlling the means of power/production. Even if we use the De-Facto meaning of Socialism, Nazi Germany never had any intention of producing a class-less society (according to Knowledge's articles on Nazism and National Socialism) or an egalitarian society.--
3551:
nationalists and racists. I don't see this being in any way contradictory - they were not communists. Goebbels went so far as to suggest in his diaries that the only difference between
National Socialism and communism was that NS wanted communism only for Germany and national independence from the rest of the world. There is a long tradition in German intellectual history of dreaming about "national socialism" - read for instance Fichte's 'GeschloĆner Handelsstaat', a fascinating text that also influenced communist thought. In the Weimar republic some fantasised about "national Bolshevism" - read Ernst Niekisch and Ernst JĆ¼nger on all that. Hitler's speeches were full of ranting against the apparently blood-sucking capitalist allied nations of the West. In reality there may not have been much difference between economic pratice in Germany and other Western countries - but Hitler & Co. certainly insisted at least on an ethos of socialism. An ideology of social equality remains in Germany to this day - top managers there generally earn less than their counterparts in, for instance, the UK or the US (and have to pay higher taxes). So long. 1st March 2006
3475:
Poland, that was invaded and has suffered trumendeous casualties during the war?? What about
Belgium and Holland, that were trying to remain neutral but the Nazis wouldn't respect it? What about Yugoslavia, that had coup d'etat in the eve of Nazi invasion, and has rejected to collaborate with the Nazis and was punished for it with bombardment and invasion, same happening in Greece as well??? Today it is well known what countries were pro-Axis and what countries were Allies. Pro-axis were (at least during the most of the course of the war): Germany (including Sudetenland, Austria, Prussia, nazi puppet of Slovakia), Italy and its dominions like Albania and Croatia (Independent State of Croatia), Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, nazi Finland and Norway. Allies were: Great Britain and Ireland with dominions, Soviet Union, France, Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), Greece, Poland, Denmark, Belgium, Holland, Czech Republic etc....for some time these states (most) were absorbed by Germany but they largely opposed the war and have had significant resistance movements even during occupation, which is the basic criteria for its Allied- enrollment.
2176:
want the Jews to be there to begin with, with the exception of the few that were overlooked (some war veterans, etc.) I see what you are suggesting: a persecuted minority remained in
Germany from the moment the Nazi regime took power up until its collapse. However, to undermine your theory, the "Final Solution" is the last of a long line of initiatives to rid Germany of this minority. In theory, national socialism is a regional interpretation of socialism, just as International Communism is another. You're not going to gain ground by arguing that this minority was not completely done away with and national equality was, therefore, not attained. In the same sense, the Soviet Union was never truly "socialist" simply because party members were hoisted above everyone else and the peasantry was trampled upon in favor of the factory hand. The facts remain that the Germans wanted an empire solely for the German Volk, which led to a nationalized culture-indentity.
3480:(including parts of Kosovo IIRC), bits of Dalmatia, and Montenegro (including bits of the Sandzak) were under Italian occupation or influence, Slovenia was divided between Italy (Carniola), Germany (southern Styria) and Hungary. Serbia and the ICS were Nazi puppets. Also please refrain from referring to Finland as being 'Nazi Finland' during WWII, they were co-belligerents and nothing more, they were just trying to recover what the Soviets stole from them during the winter war and maybe some of the ethnically-related Karelia. The map is accurate for the time-period. By you logic Italy could count as an ally as they had a resistance movement and the King Vittorio Emmanuelle III and some generals overthrew Mussolini and were eventually allowed to contribute to the allied war effort against the Germans in the balkans (though the King was reduced to 'ruling' a few scraps of land in Puglia).
2219:
a supposed universal struggle between commoner and oppressor is besides the point. If your definition of socialism maintains the same worker-obsessive focus, than you will be at odds with any real-world manifestation, as it is almost delusional. However, bits and pieces deserve our attention for the same reason some people would prefer to live in the USSR than their contemporary "democracy". As for NS Germany, the facts remain that initial Nazi anti-Semitism - and not that which involved wartime factors or the wishes of the extremist fringe - targeted Jewish capitalists for "exploiting the German country" and encouraged those of the Fat Cat legacy to flee. Sounds like a flavor of socialism to me. In theory, all is for the nation AND the nation is for the German. Corporate monopolies increased after 1933, but it was
3382:] and note the trouble it caused. I claim that when there is clear WP error and omission, as with legality, the research is to the source, and to the correction therefrom. If there is a historical anomaly, it appears to me that whatever means are necessary to find the source and the truth, are reasonable necessity. If in fact the clearest and most final source is the Nuremburg Trials or, some day, the vatican Archive for 1930-1933, and if Shirer passes on to the more stark following history, leaving only clear allusion and quotations of approbation, and leaves question hanging, if other historians build on this and leave questions hanging, and if then Cornwell et al, leave questions hanging- I see no reason not to relate what sourced questions are left hanging.
2131:
favours the people within the nation. You could go into any nation and find favoured groups, and thus we find this is a too broad definition of socialism. Next, you go on to define socialism as the state subjegating the individual. Again, with this definition many many nations in the world are socialist including the US. Your specific examples of "economic planning, abrogation of private property, conscription" have too occured in many nations around the world including the United States especially during wartime. I think you have the correct idea, but the specifics I believe are flawed. With this definition in hand, I could classify anyone and anything as socialist.
1787:
insisting on not providing any sort of distinction between them and
Marxist versions of socialism is that you are fond of lumping "left-wing" socialism in the same category as fascism. Whether that is a valid judgment or not, it certainly would be more useful for the reader to note that there are some distinctions, and I think perhaps to give a little history of the name which indicates that it is not identical to Marxist socialism (which is what is generally meant by "socialism" in my familiarity with the term, not just a vague sense of state control, a usage only used by pundits), and is more in tune with the spirit of Knowledge NPOV policies. --
2110:
economic successes (until its impatience for territorial expansion undid it), and relative religious tolerance (compared to
Communist states). Mass killings seem to be pretty standard in authoritarian states, and don't strike me as being so unique to Nazism as popular culture makes them out to be. People are often horrible, and I sympathize with Germans who feel they have been particularly maligned, while human rights abuses came long before Nazism, and continue to this day. In conclusion, we can learn from their mistakes without soiling the "good name" of socialism, and most importantly, while maintaining perspective. ] 17:37, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
3189:)." Yes, 99% of the world says "Nazi," but our readers deserve accuracy and some background on what they are reading. Not to stick my hand into a hornet's nest here (and not to start an argument over whether they were "real socialists" or not) but omitting the term "socialist" when discussing the Third Reich is like omitting "Neocon" when talking about today's United States. (Although, "Neocon America," while maybe destined for use in future encyclopedias when discussing the U.S. 2001-present, would itself be an incorrect title.) Anyways, thank you all and I'd love to hear your comments on my talk page.
383:
accused being acquitted means, other than that there was sufficient evidence to indict, but not to convict -- that's why we have trials -- to make sure that the accused are PROVEN guilty before being punished. And by the way, the whole point of the Geneva
Conventions was to establish some rules to modern warfare -- I think if you check your facts, you'll see that western warfare has, at least since the Middle Ages, had some rules. When killing technology outstripped the range of those rules, it became necessary to try to redefine those rules, hence the Geneva Conventions.
3355:
time to Hitler, to the Church, to the German public and to
International opinion, the events and their affect are not linked, not mentioned. Yes kaas is put under the banner of Cornwell at Weimar Republic because that was the only way i could link him, but as another reason for the failure of Weimar-you see nought .Eventually you come across it in an Articles text,was it at National Socialist Doctrine, ie nowhere. From the Church side it is now visible via Pius XII, but heavily massaged into the dominating hagiography and certainly not including the words Adolf Hitler.
4217:
31:
3489:
as much as that it's simply bad style - slang should have no place in an encyclopedia (as far as I'm concerned, at least... ). An encyclopedia should educate it's readers and not feed them with crude knowledge of history. I therefore suggest replacing "Nazi" with "National
Socialist" - at least in the article's title and in the first few paragraphs. Maybe some of the rest of you might like to comment below. 22nd February, 2006
3026:"popular collective" in the Soviet system? It was left powerless as a wing of the Party, yet this is as close to "socialism" in that private property was (largely) nationalized, "predatory" capitalism ended and so on and so forth. Again, if we hold socialism up on a pedestal, no, this utopia was not achieved. There are few reservations to throwing around terms such as "democracy" and the like, so what gives with socialism?--
4429:, there is a further reading link to a main article: Occupation of Poland (1939ā1945) (Nazi crimes against the Polish nation). As for additions and work done since the timeframe of October you mention, that had to do with the ACR review. The article is already over the recommended byte limit and we just cannot include everything in large detail; that is what links to other articles is for, which is available to the reader.
309:
such crimes. Moreover, it is becoming ever more likely that even those who were on the winning side (of whatever conflict) will not avoid justified prosecution. (For example, I heard a very interesting interview with an ex-US Secretary of State who was asked, in the context of
Pinochet's arrest, why he no longer traveled outside the US -- he was very irate about why he didn't have to answer that type of question...)
1254:) but it does not necessarily mean a country with an Emperor as a head of state. But definitely it is not the antonym of republic. "Weimar Republic" is just a political term. The official name of the Weimar Republic was "Deutsches Reich", like the predecessing monarchy. ItĀ“s rather to be translated simply with country or state. All in all, in "Third Reich" the "Third" is more fascist propaganda than the "Reich".
2197:
is used. Socialism lowers the higher and rises the lower; it doesn't eliminate the lower. Though it may in the end reach the same goal, it is not the socialist way the goal is accomplished. It really depends on how socialism is defined, and still calling the Nazis socialist even if there is a little socialist in them is deceptive. The US is no less socialist then the Nazis if you start extending it's meaning. --
2862:"Commie" is a slang, colloquial term in English, and a pejorative term. "Nazi" is simply the standard English word, nothing more and nothing less. Please consult any standard English dictionary. And as I mentioned to you on your talk page, "Nazist" is not an English word... you won't find it in the dictionary. Perhaps English is not your mother tongue? This may be a cause of misunderstanding. --
2162:. They support equality, and to some that looks like they are favoring a group, the worse off group. Really all they want is to be equal. So how can the Nazis be socialists when they make no clame of equality and made no attempt to bring it about (other then killing everyone that wasn't āequalā already). So before you start filling the WP with POV nonsense, read a book on the thing you hate. --
3712:
2973:(consequences) so I bring it here where it should form a small part of an 'Industrialists' section.This is brought in by John Toland as immediate consequence of Hitler's rigged success .The subject of the magnates bank-rolling Hitler prior to the rigged success is completely absent here , and so is their link to his supposed economic miracle, concerning which this sheds light.
4236:
Reich, making millions of Poles stateless, and in effect what was happening in occupied-Poland was happening in the
Greater German Reich (which happens to be the subject of this article). I find this type of omissions very shameful, and the constant removal on new materiel no matter how small very questionable (Btw, the secton on Poland had an image until some more took it down). --
651:
Polish independence guarantee). Especially in case of Britain it is very doubtful that Hitler had ever originally planed to attack it, so the Battle of Britain was most probably triggered by the British war declaration itself. One can also argue that The French and British war declaration was the most important step to move a regionally confined conflict towards a world war.
3380:, is an embarrassment. Because even though apparently Germany still qualifies this treaty as legal, the Government which made it is in all other respects considered illegal. There is an anomaly, equivalent to the anomaly that I have had to correct in WP, that Hitler came to power legally. If you care see what Shirer says here about that see that other conversation
3958:: "All encyclopedic content on Knowledge must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." Where are the reliable sources describing Nazi Germany as a socialist state?
2272:
polemic. Nazism made no effort to nationalize the means of production, or to end private property, or really to promote any kind of economic equality whatsoever. It did not arise from the politics of the left, but from the right-wing soup of Volkisch nationalism and anti-semitism. Its presidential candidate in 1925 was the ultra-right-wing WWI general
1517:
or were intimidated by his brownshirts. I would compare it to a shakedown operation (like Jesse Jackson does, go to businesses and threaten retaliation or boycott or in Hitler's case seizure of property if they did not pay up). Also, Hitler was no socialist either, he was someone who wanted power for one thing only, to expand Germany at others expense. --
1475:
people die (apparently all the dying and human rights abuses are due to capitalists). Anarchism somehow gets tied in as well, I'm not sure how or why, but maybe thats the cause of the police states communists are so fond of? As far as proof of Nazi's being socialist, I can provide a bit of that (I happen to like proof, myself). Chip chip cheerio,
3181:). I do not know this for certain, but I do not believe the term "Nazi" was used in Germany until sometime after the fall of the Third Reich, which makes the term "Nazi Germany" a questionably accurate name. This article doesn't even seem to mention the actual title of the party in the first few paragraphs. My suggestion: anywhere the term
1968:. There is no grand conspiracy here, Spade, except in the eyes of those with the worst of intentions. You are showing yourself to be a grade-A jackass. And yes, I've seen the "facts", i.e. that Hitler called himself Volkisch, as if that is a significant fact in this debate (if you'd like to get into the ramifications of National Socialist
3347:, thus the puzzle is still strangely incomplete. We are basically asked to believe, by the editing line preventing its inclusion, that although indeed the Centre Party's dissolution was on the Vatican's bargaining table (Ā ! ), that the coincidence of a prelate of the Church negotiating a crucial persuasive but indelieverd
1773:"National Labour Law of January 20, 1934, the state would exert direct influence and control over all business employing more than twenty persons. In other words, both employers and employees were put under the control of the government." Large public works projects, 100% employment, these sorts of things are socialist.
370:
parody. Speaking of the other two accusations, they were quite serious and about real issues, but nobody required that someone to be found "guilty" had to do something that wasn't standard in all other armies. And they weren't accused of breaking laws of war, they were accused of breaking something that never existed. --
3937:
correct or criticize other editors asking to include the "wrong" opinion, it is merely to present balanced views with full references. Since the above editors are obviously a) aware of this point of view exists and b) aware references exist to support it, it's more than a reasonable request. Knowledge is not censored.
2223:(and it is unclear how many of these decisions were concessions to financiers). It would have been interesting to see where Germany would have headed (besides war) since in the USSR, all the leftist griping about class led to its recreation through an ironic role reversal once the dust settled. It seems that
3550:
Ok - I don't want to carry on one of those pointless Knowledge discussions - I just want to say this: see above for what the term "National Socialist" meant. The "Nazis" WERE socialists in the sense that they sought to achieve a form of social justice within German society. At the same time they were
3307:
nonsense . The 11000 arrests of activists did not affect the vote in the Enabling Act. This article could be put right, in one short sentence but as revisionism is so powerful here on WP, I cannot expect to repair this article-it would last 5 minutes. I am, naturally enough, -blocked . The kick-back
2271:
The Soviet Union and Maoist China were socialist. And horrible. Nazi Germany was horrible, but not socialist. See how hard that was? I have no desire to put "real socialism" on a pedestal, but I do have a desire to define it in a fashion that approaches the scholarly consensus, and not right-wing
2196:
The Soviet Union was never truly socialist. Even if the goal of the Nazis may have been partly socialist (be equal), the means wasn't, and they never reached the goal. Therefore, only their intentions could even be considered socialist (at best), and even still they were not socialist is the sense it
1878:
Nowhere at the beginning of the article does it mention that "National Socialism" wasn't really socialism ala Soviet Union or Utopian Communism, but something COMPLETLY different. It leaves the reader with the impression that Hitler was a socialist (or, Hitler was a communist!) when, in truth, he was
1786:
many of their ultimate political outcomes look very similar to, say, the Leninists (anti-democratic state, state control of many resources of production, single-party rule, etc.). They are only "socialist" in the vaguest, most general sense, and it seems quite clear, Sam, that the main reason you are
626:
U-Boot -- (Unterseeboot) the infamous German submarines (Note that this word has been used since before World War I to the present day to refer to all submarines -- it has no unique connection to the Nazis. It is also unclear why German submarines are more "infamous" than the American submarines that
590:
By SoniC: I don't know if it makes sense to try and tell where all those different words came from. I mean, half of all English words are derived from Latin, French, even from Chinese (ketchup, for example) or Indian (shampoo, AFAIK). This is a science in and by itself. Maybe someone with far to much
4305:
the guidelines. Regarding the image I removed: There's really not room for more images; excessive images makes the page difficult to view for those reading the article on their phone, laptop, or tablet, and a tiny section like that one is too small to host an image, as it overlaps with the following
3858:
Diannaa is correct. Some European history is needed here. In the USA, libertarianism is currently on the right. (It used to be on the left in the US). In Europe, libertarians were always on the left. Monarchy was the main right-wing position in Europe until 1918 (when Germany, Russia, Austria &
3474:
I have a complaint, it has to do with the map of "Germany and its allies", which shows the entire Europe besides Britain and Soviet Union colored in blue (Axis colour on the map). Britain and Russia were not the only Allies in Europe, so I suggest that you at least change that subtitle!!! What about
3446:
I have found this article to be extremely useful thus far but I really think that it should contain information about life for the ordinary people in Nazi Germany. That information is hard to find and I believe that if we included that in this article then it would be used alot more for research in
3358:
I have always suspected a clear reason for this absence-which draws accusation of 'original research'- As far as my experience here, this is something which certain otherwise extremely well informed editors prefer to leave as a puzzle. A question or a contradiction, can be un-noticeable. For example
2624:
Present discription should be rewritten. There's a distinct lack of evidence as too whether or not the Nazi's lit it. And there's no consensus among the historical community whether or not they're guilty of this crime or not. And I'm talking about serious Historians, not the idiot Holocaust deniers.
2218:
Socialist as a universal, international concept it was not. However, the nation was pushed towards "socialization" - whether this was in accordance with some Marxist theory that never intended to hoist cultural and pseudo-biological identity to the forefront and instead focused almost exclusively on
1516:
complete nonsense, Hitler did not support capitalism, he merely used it. Hitler was an opportunist pur-sang. Whatever means could help him to power would do. And people with money could help him faster, however do remember that industrialists who did not want to support him had their property seized
369:
Just look at these four "accusations": first two are completely absurd. War was completely legal means of politics then (and is still one now). How one can be accused of doing something legal and what was being done by every bigger country in the worldĀ ? These two accusations alone made this trial a
321:
I disagree with the characterisation of the Nuremberg Trials as show trials or propaganda. Under customary international law going back centuries an occupying power has the right to try the troops, commanders or leaders of the defeated power for violations of the laws of war. The members of the Nazi
3936:
source reliability refers to accuracy of sourcing, not the point of view. Knowledge presents a balanced view not the correct one. It is not our job as editors to censor views and sources that offer an opinion that Nazi Germany was a socialist program. It's also not our job to decide what opinion is
3799:
We go by what the vast majority of reliable sources have to say. Evans 2003 page 170 describes the party as far-right; Shirer 1960 page 51 says right-wing. In the section "No Second Revolution" starting on page 204 Shirer describes how left-wing members of the party were seriously disappointed that
3488:
As has been said by someone else above - the beginning of the article doesn't say that the term "Nazi" is slang for "National Socialist" (a compound of the German "NAtional SoZIalist"). The fact that this (important) bit of information is missing from the beginning of the article doesn't bother me
2762:
I read somewhere (I don't remember, but it was reputable) that recent evidence indicates that it was in fact a mildly retarded Dutch Communist named van der Lubbe who set the fire, bragging about something he didn't do sounds like Goering but it's indisputable that the Nazis took advantage of it so
2557:
Well according to that reasoning, even Nazi Germany wasn't oppressive. So go ahead, change the article according to that. In fact DDR was based on Soviet style oppression that was as bad or even worse than the one in Nazi Germany. Millions died in gulags and because of Stalinist oppression. In Nazi
2175:
Bky1701, you make a very good point about equality but in your conclusion you miss key points. Nazi Germany was a flavor of socialism in that its Volk were given equal footing and the class system was seriously uprooted. The fact that NS Germany excluded others is simply irrelevant, for they didn't
1474:
My summary is that commies are rude and sassy, and more interested in hearing their own rhetoric and high-fiving one another than intellegibly discussing the particulars. Oh, and communists/socialists think "communism" or "socialism" never happened, and yet we should keep trying, no matter how many
1081:
There was no "Third Reich" de jure, the Weimar Republic's constitution from 1919 was valid until end of war 1945 (Well, mostly.) But the official name of the state was always "Deutsches Reich". "Third Reich" was invented by author Arthur Moeller van der Bruck in his book "Das Dritte Reich" in 1923.
304:
Taw, it seems to me that you are using propaganda in a purely pejorative way, and I'm not sure why. Propaganda is not necessarily a bunch of lies -- sometimes it's just an overpublication of the views of one (generally winning) side. In the case of the Nuremberg trials, yes, they were show trials
265:
Yes I suppose it would be partially redundant. However as pages get increasingly detailed and complex, it gets hard to find basic (or introductory) information on them. Therefore less general (more specific) topic names are more useful, especially if tied together through a general page. It doesn't
4364:
Of course we can have an image of Poland, just not in that tiny section. (At one time there were about 15 images of Poland in the article, which was excessive, but now it seems it's gone too far the other way!). I don't think we should use the one you added though, as the sourcing is not the best,
3559:
This article is disgustingly simple and riddled with errors. Considering the article's importance in indoctrinating younglings - as well their ability to add what they have learned(!) in High School - such an unbalanced and undereducated analysis of the regime is hardly unexpected. Even if you are
3513:
I take your point about people looking up terms they already know. Since you refer to "High School" I suppose you're from the US and it may be that the term "Nazi" is more easily understood there. Please keep in mind however that this encyclopedia is meant for anyone anywhere in the world speaking
3354:
Inclusion of this would be a massive bigoted impius POV, it is written. And decided at AHitler, where last attempted inclusion was immediately wiped. Conveniently in both the real world history and in Knowledge it is possible to obfuscate the events of the Reichskonkordat. However important at the
3025:
Then apparently neither was the Soviet Union, but it should be acknowledged that both build off of this egalitarian theory while combining elements that are foreign to the virtual definition of socialism. Practical application of the theory being turned into policy must be considered. Where is the
2956:
Some small clarity is provided by str1977 , saying that frick seems to have persuaded a 'council of reichstag eldersĀ ?) to allow for procedural amendment of the Reichstag , perhaps on the 23 march , a concoction to overcome a Socialist boycott of the sitting and Enabling Act vote. the dormancy is
2113:
Indeed, under Mao and Stalin, millions of people were either killed in Gulags/Camps off or deliberately starved into death. Even in smaller states like Cambodia, the Marxist Khmer Rouge deliberately killed a few million people, same thing went on in North Korea, communist Vietnam,... Just like the
1333:
This is POV. The reader can decide for themselves what they want to define as socialism, its a subjective term with a flexable definition. The Nazi's called themselves socialist, and thats a counter opinion, enough to give it a neutral stance in this article. Please keep your opinions in thye talk
777:
Hitler "reannexxed" Austria in ?1938? in a military action he called "Liberstruam"(Living Room in german).Although it was essentially without any fatalities, it was in clear violation of the Versialle Treaty and Austrian right to self determination. England and the U.S.A. decided to negotiate with
650:
Currently it sounds like Germany suddenly attacked a range of countries including France and Britain. In reality Germany attacked only Poland, which then led to war declarations by Britain and France towards Germany (and interestingly enough NOT towards the Soviet Union though it also violated the
396:
Second I know how political show trials work, because I lived in communist country and we had lot of them here. They work this way: some of minor accused are usually acquitted (often those who agree to colaborate with secret police), many of the accused are found guilty of only some of accusations
308:
Moreover, there is now a legal precedent for the punishment of those who walk the fine line between war crime and genocide. This has led to some very interesting court cases of late, and a new legal theory that any sovereign state can detain a citizen of another based on accusations of committing
3739:
If the Nazis were the extreme tip of the right-wing of political ideology, they would have favored the weakest of government power, not the strongest. The extreme right wing is manifested by libertarian (and at the climax of the right wing, anarchist) ideology in which individuals have all of the
3546:
Seriously, take a chill pill! Look up an encyclopedia. *Goes and looks* MY encyclopedia does not have anything on National Socialist, except for in the NAzi Germany article. When doing an assignment, someone is more likely to look up NAzi Germany. Who will benefit more - the person who already
3517:
High school is an international concept. I am, in fact, from Australia and no one referes to Nazi Germany as "National Socialist Germany", except for history teachers. I see that redirecting would be the right thing to do and we would have to make sure that it is made clear in the introduction
3363:
can be un-linked within text, even though sources are given repeatedly to show his importance. Oh he gets the sanitised safe mention-and his page is massaged, but no link and above all no mention of his being a prelate of the RC Church at the time, nor that he was personally arranging the crucial
3077:
Also why do people always have to use the word "Nazis"? The Axis forces on the Eastern Front included hundreds of thousands of troops from Italy, Romania, and Hungary each, as well as co-belligerent Finland and tens of thousands of Waffen-SS volunteers from all over Europe, as well as the Spanish
2308:
support some Socialistic ideas. However, these elements of the party never achieved any real power, and were largely purged in 1934. The Nazi regime was founded on an alliance with the reactionary right, and, as such, any radical Nazi economic policies, except for the anti-semitic ones, did not
2130:
An interesting assesment, though one I must disagree with. First off, you at first define "socialist" as a "collectivist ideololgy" favouring possibly different groups. However if we use this definition, every nation in the world is socialist for with nationalism comes a sort of collectivism that
2098:
Economic planning, abrogation of private property, conscription, and quite a few other things are clear examples of subjecting the individual to the state or the "greater good." Whatever this state claims to advocate, and whose "greater good" is in question, are only cosmetic differences. Aside
1948:
I believe in compiling information from a variety of sources, AND consulting the veracity of the sources. What I don't do is buy into the "everybody of POV X is evil, so we'll label them as revisionist and ignore them". Also, who better than a nazi to give info on Nazi economics? Have you seen my
566:
Notes by LA2: While holocaust as a phenomenon is certainly associated with Nazi Germany, this particular term is not a German word. On the other hand, there are other German non-Nazi words that are used in English language, and it could be worth while to explain them. Should this be done from a
465:
I suggest starting with the chapters on the end of the Weinmar Republic and Gleichschaltung. The previous form of the article was plainly wrong, it focused 80% on world war II military history, and the rest where just links, but the links ought to be integrated with the text and chapters expanded
441:
Actually, the joke is not in using "12 year reich", but in using the phrase "1000 year reich". The powers that were used the phrase "1000 year reich" a lot, and the joke was on them when it turned out that it came crashing down after twelve years, luckily. So referring to the "1000 year reich" in
333:
of those who were found gulity in the Nuremberg Trials were in fact not, or only partially. Don't quote me on this, I don't remember the source, maybe TV or newspaper. The Nuremberg Trials have a certain "guilty until proven otherwise" touch, though, again, I can't back this up right now. I think
4235:
yet there is no image in the entire article which highlights Polish suffering ā yet, some section have a double image in a thumb frame just to get the point across. What I also find disingenuous that the issue of Poland is minimized, yet this was a country which was fully annexed into the German
4119:
Thanks again. I'm not entirely sure of the technical aspects either, though I can look at it again tomorrow. My patience with the technical and bureaucratic aspect with this project are pretty much up, but that is another story. Thanks for the update to this page and for the assistance. I do
2565:
Yes, *I* don't dispute this either, however I just think we should refrain from emotionally charged comments presented as fact in an encyclopedia of any sort. Even "It is commonly accepted that X nation is totalitarian" is much better than "X nation is an evil dictatorship!", wouldn't you agree?
1940:
I'm hoping you've just misinterpretted what has been said here and are not actually arguing that "evidence" from a Holocaust denial website to support the notion that the Nazis were "socialist" makes sense. The first thing a historian does is consult the reputation/veracity of their sources, you
1781:
I think the key thing to note is that the Nazis did not agree with the philosophy or political theory of Marx, or the German Democratic Socialist Workers Party. Defining "socialist" as "large public works projects" is not a useful definition (what country is NOT socialist, then?) and is not what
1039:
Yuk. I see what you mean. I think the image can be saved if it is put in the proper context of a propagandistic image by associated text. Its an attempt to merge traditional German concepts together with Nazi Party concepts and to associate the two, which is a concept touched on briefly in the
431:
While the phrase "Twelve-Year Reich" is often used in a joking way, I don't believe any credible historian uses that term professionally. I think this is a case where one of this article's authors has let personal opinions skew his/her writing. Unless references can be quoted showing established
2227:
Socialism may be completely reliant on the presence of an outside "other" or at the very least, an external rival. Still, I invite you to name a civilization that has not thrived while castigating the outsider and promoting its own self-identity. Marxists are no stranger to this philosophy, but
1979:
Some extreme left-wing writers have worked tirelessly since 1945 to detach National Socialism from Socialism and instead, with ulterior political motives, attach it compleatley to the right-wing. These same left-wingers ignored Stalinās Gulags and Maoās death camps until the late 1970ās; again,
668:
from Chamberlain would have been to prefer for the Third Reich. That doesn't change the facts that their policy aimed at a radical revision of the Versailles peace; a policy that already at the time of the declarations of War had put an end to the independence of Austria and Czechoslovakia, and
382:
Sorry, Taw, but that's why they came up with the charge of Crimes against Humanity, I think -- no one had ever done anything remotely like the Holocaust (arguably, I know, but let's say, in the modern world) before -- special circumstances made this necessary. And I'm not sure what some of the
3375:
folds Weimar prior to the subsequent and intrinsically so , because sourced, Reichskonkordat. The beginning of the Third Reich, well, under changes or culture or alliances-no mention and no link. Again, I have always suspected in the curious absence that reference to the Reichskonkordat is not
2109:
I thank you for your wise and agreeable statements. While I understand the motivation of Socialists who wish to distance themselves from unpopular variations of their ideology, the category is incredibly broad and inclusive. IMO Nazism was significant among other totalitarian socialisms in its
2094:
1) Socialism generally defines a hodgepodge of ideologies that can seem to be radically different from one another, however 2) All forms of socialism are based on a collectivist ideology. 3) These ideologies can favor differing groups, such as "workers," a "master race," or whatever the stated
2027:
No, they opposed any form of workers control of the economy whether democratic socialism, social democracy or Communism, they opposed trade union rights and all facets of socialism. They just misappropriated the term as a means of appealing to the working class but, in practice, the Nazis were
1997:
Well, Degrelle, who always stayed a Nazi said here āIt is a fact that the newly rich classes emerging from the industrial revolution had enormously abused their privileges and it was for this reason that the National Socialists were socialists.ā So it shows Nazis did in fact view themselves as
4350:, but not for example the one showing Soviet POW which was in the section right below Poland? That's why I find some of the editing choices a bit questionable. Btw, in Germany there are monument to all different groups which were targeted by the Nazis, the one that missing is for the Poles. --
3732:
The article refers to the Nazi ideology as a right-wing one. Economically, the left wing supports a government-run economy and the right wing supports a free market. Social politics gets murkier, but I don't know of any compelling arguments that would prove the Nazis were socially right-wing
3479:
Yes, but if you actually look at the key at the top of the map it says it's for the period '41-'42 and during that period the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway and parts of France were occupied, Vichy France was a german satellite, Greece was divied up between Italy and Bulgaria, Albania
2832:"Nazi" is the standard term in English, for the party and the regime and for persons adhering to them. It is not "juvenile", and it is not considered a colloquialism or an abbreviation, it is simply the standard word used in English and far more commonly used than "National Socialist". The
3542:
Well, I suppose the Nazi faction wins then... I still think it's worrying however for an encyclopedia to pander to a sort of general level of knowledge - after all, people look things up in an encyclopedia to learn more about them. The fact that Google returns more search results for "Nazi"
2372:
I know you were responded to bky, but you were also making the general comment that opposition to the idea that the Nazis were socialist comes out of an idealization of socialism. I wanted to take issue with this, because, while perhaps this is occasionally true, it is not always the case.
3198:
Dear Paul, "Nazi" was used as early as the 1920s as a short name for the NSDAP and its adherents. It was formed in imitation of the earlier "Sozi", which is short for Sozialist or Sozialdemokrat. I agree that the title Nazi Germany is a bit casual but then again it's also very descriptive.
2523:
No. If a person in the US feels as if they are being oppressed, does that give them permission to go around Knowledge editing articles that make the US look like an evil totalitarian state? Knowledge should strive to be neutral, and while it should offer viewpoints, it shouldn't push them.
2550:, now does it? If we allow it for DDR, we must allow it for all nations (including the US), and I'm sure that many here would have difficulties with that. It is, in my opinion, NPOV to put that SOME think that the East was oppressive (which is true, without taking sides on the issue).
688:
Note to whomever corrected the spelling of "organisation" to "organization", both British and American spellings are acceptable on Knowledge. Gratutitous edits to change from one to the other are unnecessary, unless the spelling changes in an annoying manner within the one article
3859:
others) lost their monarchy). Then "right" in Europe shifted to fascism in many countgries & naziism in Germany. Nazis were never libertarian. As for "socialist" in NSDAP that refers not to Marxism but to the primacy of society over the individual (ie anti-libertarian).
3351:, up-ending the Reichstag , and instituting Dictatorship, that this is not reasonable to mention in the same breath as him being also a close friend and associate of the relevant Vatican power. And that the Reichskonkordat isn't relevant to the change in Germany in 1933.
642:
Note two things: In the East there are mentioned Red army and Polish army, which, because i am Pole, suits me well, but there wer also other armies in the east, although much much smaller. Second, i thought that it was England who declared war on Germany, not the opposite?
594:
I propose to use this particular page for terms that are really related to Nazi Germany, i.e. terms you will find when reading reports, literature or whatever about the Third Reich. These can be German terms now also used in English or other terms used in the Nazi context.
2338:
Actually, my comments were directed towards bky1701, but I appreciate your input. Always good to hear more than one voice, even you sound pained by your "obligation" to write. I'd bet the house that you were in a fit of procrastination, seeing as you're a grad student.Ā :)
1782:
people generally mean by socialist. I think a proper handling of this question would be to say that the name is a deliberate plagiarism of the Marxist party in Germany, and that the Nazis differed very greatly in their philosophy and political theory than the Marxists,
1588:
Dr. Goebbels said, "Germany is a republican Fuhrer-state". He also said, "Besides, I pay homage to the French Revolution for all the possiblities fo life and development that it brought the people. In that sense one could say, if you like, that I am a democrat."
2245:
United States!? Are you kidding? That is the antithesis of socialism compared to NS Germany and the rest of the more modern world. As I mentioned further below, I think part of the problem is this tendency to put "real socialism" on a pedestal of infallibility.
771:
Dear ohh dear. This article needs some serious work on pre-WWII. I've just remove a couple of recently contributed paragraphs that contained some classic ill-informed nonsense that Duffy would have blown his top at. I'm going to put this in Bad Jokes etc.. e.g.
3493:
I think we should keep the title, specially since Nazi Germany and the Holocaust is a big assignment topic in High School. We need to make it clearer what Nazi comes from as its quite unclear. We could/should bold out the letteres so it looks like thisĀ :
4416:
E-960, as stated this is only an overview article and given the subject matter one could pour in everything and throw in the kitchen sink. But, that is not practical and the fact is for the section mentioned, besides the links to other articles, including
322:
regime were accused of serious violations of international law, and I don't think anyone can really argue that they were innocent of what they were accused of. The trial and punishment of the accused was fair and legal, under the standards of the time. --
4251:
I agree with Diannaa's assessment. I have about 6' of books about Nazi Germany, a good portion of which is about the suffering of various peoples under the Nazi regime. It cannot all be put into this article, which is already very, very, long. It's a
1623:
Hitler said, "I am not only the conqueror but also the executor of Marxism--of that part that is essential and justified, stripped of its Jewish Talmudic dogma.". He also said, "This revolution of ours is the exact counterpart of the French Revolution."
4366:
3312:
digital advance....Oh I forgot to say that the revisor of Hitler was the User immediately above. He is the subject of the link 'diffs', as he contradicted himself from his much earlier agreement with Atkins and Tallet. This is enough to short-circuit
1829:
Hmm. Your seemingly refusal to address his points is interesting, though largely irrelevant - We should at least put that some people believe that Hitler was not a socialist, perhaps without stating the view as fact until this dispute is sorted out?
2611:
A web vandal apparently got a hold of my password and posted some pretty nasty messages then proceeded to attack my user page. Looks like they were blocked. Anyone know how to change a Knowledge password? In any event, the article was restored.
3376:
desired. That the clear illegality of the 23 (per Shirer and everyone after the Nuremberg Trials-) which led to Hitler himself, in effect, negotiating by this illegally effected 23 Act, a legal Internatinal treaty on behalf of Germany with the
526:
there is however no full documented proof that " 6 milion Jews" were killed. It is purely a propganda tool to shock the public & breed sympathy for the eternal whinging wandering Jew/Zionist movement, and it has been successful for 60 years.
4103:, because it may have something to do with how the system is handling hyphens and ndashes, or something like that. In any case it's beyond my technical abilities to figure out what's going on, and the folks at VPT are likely to be helpful.
3800:
the socialist part of the platform would not be carried out; he says on page 205 that Hitler never had any intention of fulfilling these campaign promises; "the Nazi socialist slogans had been merely propaganda" to win over the electorate.
1165:
contexts that is, in this case it is outright wrong. Hitler's Thousand Years Reich may well have become an empire, if the Anglo-Saxons had continued their passivity, but it seems as Churchill and Pearl Harbor put an end to that prospect.
4190:
2926:
Boringly , I say WP needs to get to the bottom of the above title, namely the vaunted(in WP) "changes of procedure" that allowed not only the loss of civil liberties (and I do not refer to the omission of the habeas corpus protectin
3743:
The Nazi ideology was, therefore, a left-wing one and not a right-wing one unless I am severely mistaken. Branding the Nazi ideology in the same manner as conservatives in the US are branded could appear disingenuous to some readers.
3107:
I believe the flag depicted as the "Nazi war flag" was simply the flag of the German navy during World War II, perhaps it is a misinterpretation due to the German word for navy--"Kriegsmarine" (people may know that Krieg means war in
2472:
You know, Nazis are commonly refered as socialists by many of people I know (and at least equal people refers to them as rightist, but that's not important). I am not sure if "most europeans" will correctly reflect the reality.
1972:, we could, but what we're really talking here are layman's understandings of typical economic terms). If those are your ideas of compelling historical facts, I'm going to have to say that, as a historian, I'm not impressed. --
2304:. Only with a bizarrely idiosyncratic definition of "socialism," which you seem to have, can one describe the Nazis as socialist, in general. It is true that there was a quasi-left-wing element within the party, who actually
3686:
The sentence reading "The German community was nationalized and both labor and entertainment, from festivals, to vacation trips to traveling cinemas, as part of the "Strength through Joy" program." is nonsensical in English.
505:
2004-01-09: "This persecution reached a peak in the last years of the regime, in which some 6 million Jews, *10 million Slavs*, and sundry others, were systematically killed. This genocide is referred to as the Holocaust..."
3146:
This sounds a little to straightforward and self-congraulatory to me, other factors have been cited such as hard work and financial discipline of the Germans, along with the boom in manufacturing as a result of the Korean
2460:
Any history book, any memoires, this is not in any way a contested issue ā on this side of the Atlantic, at least. It's possible that you, if you search carefully, can find some dissertations covering even this axiomatic
4067:
I believe someone changed a hyphen in the title to an ndash, or something like that. The answer is to replace the current file name with:File:Flag of Germany (1935ā1945).svgwhich links to the current name of the image.
3560:
going to resort to a single point of view, at least make an attempt to pass it off as legitimate by working on grammar. ---Okay, I added what I could. Hope my contributions are beneficial to the Wiki community. Cheers.
141:
I personally wouldn't have chosen to do it this way (I'm playing devil's advocate here, to an extent), but it does act as a useful link page and is almost certainly going to be a target for queries. These things should
2877:
i created this article when i was in year 12 for an assignment, it cannot be inside the encyclopedia as it is not biased nor make no conclusions, but it is a very good look at how each seem simila -- User:Whatsup_will
2228:
instead resort to ideological classifications rather than ethnic. I cannot agree with your statement that "socialists do NOT support one group over another" because they merely redefined their us and them world view.
2014:
They opposed communism, communism is not the same as socialism. Its just a sub branch. In the same way Soviet communists opposed the Western European Social Democrats, and the communist Chinese denounced the Soviet
799:
I do not totally understand what you were writing here, but I guess that you mean Chamberlain and I can tell you that "Liberstruam" is definitely no German word and I do not know what it means, at least not living
397:
and majority is sentenced to less than attorney demanded. And that's all to make it look more like a real trial. Anyway I can't see much difference between Communist political show trials and Nuremberg show trial.
305:-- but was that bad? Since then, the world has taken more seriously the concept of "Crimes against Humanity" and there have been more and more attempts to prosecute those who are believed to have committed them.
1508:. Sam, we've had this debate before and you always lose only to pop up a few months later in another article pushing the same ignorant POV. In future, please try to learn about the topic you are writing about.
2052:? And no, a neutral discussion would reject holocaust denial out of hand. Do you also believe that those who believe the universe revolves around the earth must be party of any neutral discussion on astronomy?
1113:
About van der Bruck, there are many references: EncyclopƦdia britannica: German cultural critic whose book Das Dritte Reich (1923; āThe Third Empire,ā or āReichā) provided Nazi Germany with its dramatic name.
473:
This article should primarily deal with the political history of the Nazi regime, the German military history of WWII being dealt on a page of its own. Most of the Gleichschaltung article should also be moved
3238:
There are some problematic "members" in that section, especially in the sub-section "Others". Some have not actually lived in or during the Third Reich, though they were connected or had influence to Nazism.
3502:
alistische. I did this for my recent assignment. I do agree with you that the purpose of Knowledge and any encyclopedia is to educate but we have to keep in mind what the reader will more than likely look
2931:
by Hindenburg at the Fire Act ).That was an omission,. I mean the decree/procedure change that is so far un-sourced , which procedure enabled the arrest of Deputies . I point always to article two of the
3532:, not more "correct" ones. A quick Google search shows that "Nazi Germany" gets a hundred times the hits of "National Socialist Germany." In my experience pretty much all historians also prefer "Nazi." -
1980:
because of politics. However, many historians have put the record straight and managed to show that National Socialism is in fact a sub branch of Totalitarian Socialism just like Stalinism or Maoism is.
4082:
Thanks. I'm not going through hundreds of articles to fix someone else's screw up. But it is at least good to know what went down. And I left a message on the Commons page. Thanks again. Cheers. --
4026:
I noticed this on a number of historic battle articles, including one linked on the main page of Knowledge; the flag is not rendering properly. Here or anywhere else. Can anyone fix this? Thanks. --
3334:"Thus was parliamentary democracy finally interred in Germany, except for the arrests of the Communists and some of the Social Democrat deputies, it was done quite legally,though accompanied by terror."
867:
in one sense, but the article isn't referring to Hitler as an emperor. The word has some implications about referring to "the state", anyway -- even the communists called the East German Railways the
1960:
at the site in question? The main page of it says "Welcome to the World's largest website for Historical Revisionism!" The point about sources stands no matter what: if the source isn't trustworthy,
1906:
What's the deal with posting a link to a Holocaust revisionism website? This is pretty inappropriate and in awful taste, much less casting a bit of doubt on your ability to be NPOV, in my opinion. --
3905:
Unless I am badly mistaken, no one has even been able to come up with a neutral reliable source which labels the Nazi Party as anything other than right-wing. (The citation above is most definitely
2309:
actually come to pass. I'm getting tired of this nonsense coming up again and again. (I'm also tired of people who say things like "the Soviet Union was never truly socialist" being on my side...)
3514:
English and should therefore stay as linguistically neutral and accurate as possible. How about getting "Nazi Germany" to redirect to "National Socialist Germany"? Anyone else? 25th February 2006
1350:
The idea that the Nazis were or are somehow Socialist is a misunderstanding. There must be limits to Knowledge's reluctance to differentiate truths and facts from misconceptions and propaganda. --
2546:
Nice try, but no. My personal belief is that the DDR was an oppressive dictatorship. However, labelling a nation as an "oppressive dictatorship" doesn't quite fit in with the Knowledge policy of
1195:'s revert of my correction on this point seems highly surprising, unless it reveals an innsufficient grasp of the German language ā although it may of course be me, who is lacking in my English.
179:
We don't need to keep repeating ourselves - just link. You should find more detail about nazi gemrany in the specific nazi germany entry than in the general history of Germany entry. -rmhermen
1405:
The idea that the Nazis were or are somehow Socialist is a misunderstanding. There must be limits to Knowledge's reluctance to differentiate truths and facts from misconceptions and propaganda.
1023:
I think it would be useful with a caption indicating that it was an attempt to symbolize unification of Germany and Nazi Party. Just sitting there by itself it looks a little propaganda-ish.
3581:, drawn from the movement's occult influences. One can see this manifested in many areas, such as the Nazi mantra "Ein volk, ein reich, ein fuhrer", quite similar to the Christian Trinity. --
1065:
I'd like to see sources for this statement and exactly how the Soviet Union provoked (or planned to provoke) the western powers into going into war. If nothing is forthcoming I'll remove it.
2296:. They consciously modeled themselves on Mussolini's Fascists, who explicitly described themselves as right wing, and were violently opposed to the self-described parties of the left - the
3547:
knows its National Socialist or the one who knows it as NAzi. Also, they were really only NAtional Socialist in name, not in practise. Nazi fits better. IT also makes it less confusing.
3070:
This makes it sound like the Germans were essentially defeated for good at Stalingrad, and that all the Soviets did after that was advance westwards. Kursk was a massive offensive launched
513:
There where far more than 10 million civilian casualties in the former Soviet Union (Slavs), the number is actually around 20 million, that died from starvation, disease, and maltreatment.
2983:
bills ( Metall-Forschungsgesellschaft A.G.) which could be drawn by Government contractors , that acted as a form of promissary notes and which allowed Hitler to re-arm on a large scale.
4370:
4186:
3371:
This is not all the history, but it is absent history and as I say conveniently sits at the threshold of the Third Reich. The end of Weimar set at the barrier of 23 March 1933 ,at the
1678:
Not a "false dichotomy" at all. Goebbels is also "known" for being a professional liar, thus any claims he makes, particularly public cliams about the goals of Nazism, are unreliable.
1269:. The socialism in name only bit is unacceptable. As far as the empire distinction, I find it questionable, but will trust your judgement if you insist, and no one else steps in.
611:
might include not just a definition of the term but what some psychologists have to say about it (I don't know what psychologists do have to say about it, if anything, though). --
516:
Combine that with about 10 million deaths in the Red Army, and you get to the staggering number of about 30 million dead, the reason why the WW2 is still quite remembered there.
3809:
1453:
There has been rather extensive debates on other talk pages on this issue. I wonder if maybe Sam Spade was a participant also of this debates, and if he could sumarize those?
1849:. As far as whatever else Fastfission alluded to, discuss it in my talk page or something, its off topic here. I'd say my summary was sufficient . ] 23:25, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
673:
either German or Soviet acquisitions. The power balance shifting thusly could not be expected to be passively noted by the Western Powers. Ultimately, it threatened them. --
4365:
and it's not clear who is being shot. How do we know for sure (given the sketchy source) that they're even Polish? Better to choose a different photo. How about we replace
2676:
I just had a read of the Reichstag fire page and it doesn't seem to pass judgement (it refers to Halder implicating Goering, but also to a historian who argued against it).
917:
page therefore correctly mentions that the term is used in the German Lord's prayer (and throughout the Bible also) in a very transcendental meaning. See my new entry on
2505:
The phrase "endure communist oppression" is rather editorial. Anyone got a good idea for replacing it with something more neutral and in keeping with an encyclopedia?
4180:
3299:. However, even that limited aspect is forbidden, naturally. Naturally because even that post-Enabling Act scurrilous barter is shocking scandal, which leads into the
2042:
must be a part of any neutral discussion of past events. Your comments make it clear that NPOV has no place in your conception of a "tasteful" encyclopedia article. ]"
1936:
must be a part of any neutral discussion of past events. Your comments make it clear that NPOV has no place in your conception of a "tasteful" encyclopedia article. ]
2979:
The Reichstag success also brought into the open a number of industrialists who had supported Hitler , and unlimited credit was extended to the regime in the form of
1549:
Except that Nazism WASN'T a form of collectivism. Not in the least. See AG Farben, the Fricks and other industrialists who made a killing (literally and figuratively)
3276:
The inclusion of civil liberies is a means to avoid the truth - the truth is that un-constitutional arrest gave Hitler the chance to subvert the remaining catholic
3066:
The article states: "By February 1943 the Soviets had defeated the Nazis at Stalingrad and began the push westward, winning the tank battle at Kursk-Orel in July."
4318:. The sub-articles are linked in the navigation templates and section hatnotes for those interested in exploring different aspects of the topic in more detail. ā
1525:
The debate over whether National Socialism was really "socialism" is much ado about nothing. Basically, "socialism" has moved into the public domain (much like "
2886:. If you have an essay or original theory based on your own research, unfortunately an encyclopedia isn't the place for it (see the link to understand why). --
1546:"The important fact is that Nazism was a form of collectivism (see my other posts) and is different from other collectivist ideologies only in superficial ways"
3736:
Nazi is actually shorthand for 'National Socialist' which is 'Nationalsozialistische' in German. The Nazis controlled businesses, healthcare, and education.
2091:...and stick my nose where it may not belong. The following are my thoughts, which I offer with the hope that they can clear up the debate over "socialism."
619:
3812:
notes that "While Hitlerās party carried the word āsocialistā in its name, only a few of the policies pursued by him were left-wing or indeed socialist." ā
3303:
literature (multiple books exist). What about Knowledge civil liberties? We are under constant revisionist attack, and that is why this article repeats the
509:
The article about the holocaust talks about "3.5ā6 million Slavic civilians". Quite a difference. Someone with more expertise should try to clarify this...
3529:
3410:
3403:
3399:
This seccion is missing, there is no metion here of third reich relations here with Italy, Japan, Spain; Finland, Romania o USA before and during the war
996:
I've heard "Reich" translated as "realm" in English, this word has connotations of medieval Britain to me but perhaps it's more accurate than "empire".--
913:
has more connotations than a territory being ruled by an Emperor. It has a strong mythological background and is really not translatable to English; the
1535:
doesn't hold a copyright on it, so it isn't a proprietary name that is strictly controlled in its use. The important fact is that Nazism was a form of
591:
time on their hands can do such a page in the Linguistics section, but if you start something like that, you will end up having a complete dictionnary.
266:
require the general page page to be only an outline (hierarchy) though. It can have basic information and links to the more specific pages. -rmhermen
254:
History of Germany can easily include a general treatment of years 1933-1945 while Nazi Germany continues to be a highly detailed account. -rmhermen
1941:
know. Why don't you spend a few minutes thinking about whether or not you agree with me on this one before replying with another smartass comment. --
732:
YA HISTORY PRETTY MUCH SUCKS..I REALLY DONT CARE FOR IT AT ALL..I WOULD JUST LOVE IT IF TABATHA HOFF WOULD JUST MAKE ME MY DINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
607:
Of course, very many words borrowed from foreign languages are also names of topics about which enyclopedias might well want to have articles--e.g.,
4310:. This is an overview of the topic. Additional material is present at sub-articles. In fact you copied some of the material from the sub-articles
3295:
The kick-back did not, of course start then, as Hitler's speech proves , and sources attest and was not limited to the Centre but inculpates the
1060:
strategy to provoke Europe's capitalist powers into war against each other to facilitate Communist revolutions by their war-ravaged proletarians.
600:
274:
is not its function to collect/organize facts and pointers. I only think it is more important to integrate this page into general German history.
2967:
Consolidation of Power contains nil reference to the above . Indeed this subject is hard to find anywher in the german history pages, very hard .
3830:
2099:
from the damage done by association with National Socialism, there is no reason why this brand of socialism should be set apart from any other.
412:
You have to look beyond the basic four charges at the more detailed evidence, the small version alone takes up about 40ft of library shelving.
2642:
a common Knowledge problem. A briefer text here must somehow summarize the more throughout and more npov-ish text of a more specific article.
4311:
2276:, and prior to coming to power it was a member in good standing of several right wing coalitions with mainstream right wing groups like the
442:
conjunction with speaking of that period of time is used as a half-joking reference in exposing the lie that is behind the 1000-year claim.
3988:
not wikilinked at all, preferably at the earliest mention in the article? It seems like a very basic thing to miss off a Knowledge entry!
3284:
conclusion, that the kick-back scheme with the Centre started on 9 April 1933. I refer you to my response of a few days ago at final diffs
2824:
3618:. Moeller was an early mentor of the Nazi movement, but he dismissed Hitler whom he thought primitive. Goebbels forbade the book in 1939.
940:
What are you both talking about here? I've never doubted any of it (except maybe the statement that it was the Nazis who created the term
759:
Removed Book of Odin reference and Norway Adam and Eve. Did Google search on "Book of Odin" AND "Nazi" and got nothing. Need references.
2739:
a prominent general mentioned (I forgot who it was) that Goering had boasted to him that he had personally set fire to the Reichstag. --
2114:
Jews, all these other people were also killed because they were called the "enemies of the people/revolution/ideology/proletariat,...".
1346:
which they considered to be quite something else than Communism and Social Democracy (which is what generally is understood by the term
352:
I'd argue that the trial and punishment of the accused was fair and legal under the standards of the current time. One should point out
3332:] which will become Archive 7 doubtless very soon, and see where I expand and quote William L.Shirer re the legality of the takeover:
1845:
You can add that many contemporary socialists don't think he's a socialist w/o my objecting, anything more than that and you'll need a
4422:
4418:
4342:
4281:
was in the section on Poland not causing clutter or anything, it got removed, when I tried to re-added today all of a sudden there is
2301:
1131:
Term "Das Dritte Reich" was banned "Im Juli1939 verbot das Propagandaministerium die weitere Verwendung des Begriffes "Drittes Reich"
314:
So, I guess I'm asking what your implied objection is -- unless it's that others, including the Soviets, got away with their actions?
291:
First, there was no Polish army in 1944-45. There were Polish army units of Red Army, but they were completely controlled by Rusians.
3672:
The eagle doesn't show the "coat of arms" but the "Party eagle". The coat-of-arms-eagle displayed the head turned to the left side.--
3568:
this article does not say who coined the term Third Reich. was it Hitler? was it an English speaking historian? please give details.
3989:
1814:
Alot of the rest of what you are saying is either wrong, or not relevant, but I would be ok with you presenting information on how
2811:"Nazi" is partisan, juvenile and pejorative. 'National Socialist Germany' or 'Germany under Hitler' is much more appropriate. --
4345:
3161:
I do not know if this has been brought up as an issue in the past, but this seems like something that should be fixed. The term
3955:
3933:
2600:
2453:
2411:
2079:
1712:
1660:
1576:
1280:
554:
4339:
4301:
My removing the addition is not related to the subject matter you chose to add, but is based on best practices as outlined in
2836:
policy applies. It is not pejorative except in the sense that, well, the Nazis don't exactly have a very good reputation. --
3805:
3782:
3280:
bloc. The truth is not acceptable here on WP , viz even the removal from Adolf Hitler of the half-way truth of John Kenney's
2990:
2883:
3043:
The Soviet Union was socialist, because its official ideology said that the people should control the means of production.
2480:
You traitor!Ā ;-)) If the ignorance is harboured already on the other side of Oder, how can we expect the Americans to learn?
2186:
2166:
707:, much of it not even about German involvement (e.g. North Africa). Shouldn't the pre-war years get at least as much space?
281:, then all the pieces will fall into place. Whether this peculiar place is called Nazi Germany or 1933-1945 is secondary. --
3258:
Lanz von Liebenfels, actually lived in Austria during the time it was annexed by Nazi Germany, but as a figure of obscurity
3891:
talk page has a nice little capsule of frequently asked questions, which Aluaxelman you may want to read on this subject.
1290:
Fun that you trust me! I think you can do that quite confidentially also with respect to how Europeans view the degree of
229:
While dedicated pages for important eras offer a good opportunity to collect some links, the overall picture should be in
3262:
Under the circumstances the best solution probably would be to rename or split up the "Others" section. Any suggestions?
1998:
socialists. In fact, Nazis were populist socialists in their domestic politics, at least when it came to ethnic Germans.
4202:
3591:
3461:
This section is badly missing. What was administrative status of occupied lands? Terminology? Satellites/protectorates?
2936:
and the contradiction between that and such "procedura" change. Vital , Str1977, so please please find it for the WP .
1098:: ...the North German Confederation (1867-1871) was transformed into the German Empire ("Deutsches Reich", 1871-1945)...
2439:
1805:
BTW, I'm fine w pointing out that Hitler opposed Social democracy, which is completely different from totalitarianism.
105:
79:
71:
66:
2685:
How does, "It is unclear whether the Nazi party was involved in the fire, but they undoubtedly took advantage of it"?
3770:
3343:
I came thru here to check , and no there is still no link out of here, Weimar not the central AHitler, towards the
2028:
entirely for capitalism and were bankrolled by industrialists and major capitalists as a bulwark against socialism.
4176:
2833:
2297:
243:
Another thing: You cannot cover WWII in ], because it inherently involves more than one. This is not the case with
38:
4443:
As for adding photos, I am sure something can be worked out; exchange as Diannaa mentions seems like a good idea.
4306:
section. Regarding the prose I removed: Articles should not be above a certain size - see the recommendations at
2501:
West Germany recovered by the 1960s, but East was not so lucky; it had to endure communist oppression until 1990.
3217:
button , prior to any necessary absolute repetition; ie this is done after source in good Faith. The source was
4055:
2064:? Holocaust denial would suggest denial of the holocaust, not an interpretation of nazi political practices as
104:
I think it does have a need for separate treatment and should be linked appropriately. In much the same way as
3413:. I am not a German, and (so) it needs people of the German wikipedian community to bring it up to scratch. -
3290:
2818:
2418:
Yes, and is perfectly clear and correct with the current wording. Leaving that out, and Knowledge propagates
432:
historians using that phrase, I believe the sentence should be removed on the grounds that it's innacurrate.
294:
Second, it wasn't just Germany but also Soviet actions (attack against Poland and Finland) that started WW2.
4479:
4263:
4198:
4157:
4108:
4073:
4041:
3916:
3603:
3602:. He belonged to an obscure and heterogenous movement of elitist-bohĆØme right wing intellectuals called the
1532:
1115:
400:
Third there was no rule of modern warfare that German Army broke that weren't being broken by everyone else.
4348:
4279:
3993:
2438:
Failing to provide the reader w uncited nonsense does a disservice to no one, other than perhaps yourself.
358:
that three of the Nuremberg defendants (von Papen, Frisch, and Schacht) were accquitted of all charges. --
4307:
4003:
Added. People are constantly editing the lead; it probably just got accidentally removed at some point. ā
3878:
3850:
3790:
2158:
There is a major fail in your reasoning: socialists do NOT support one group over another. To say this is
2061:
2039:
1933:
654:
3543:
illustrates exactly what I've said above: it's a slang term, used by everyone anyway. 26th February 2006
2814:
921:
also. It is exactly this fuzzy warm feeling that the Nazis exploited with the creation of the expression
211:
3420:
2904:
2567:
2551:
2525:
2132:
1969:
1880:
1831:
489:
3698:
3659:
3582:
2689:
2629:
2589:
Care to cite that? I'm done reverting for today, but tomorrow, tomorrow, is only... a d-a-y a-w-a-y...
2292:. The Nazis were brought to power by an intrigue within the extremely right-wing coterie of President
203:
3014:
3749:
3745:
3277:
3148:
3109:
3083:
2957:
still separtae and undated, and seems quite illegal viz section 2 Eact and the Empire Constitution .
2949:
2788:
2764:
2740:
1609:
1539:(see my other posts) and is different from other collectivist ideologies only in superficial ways.
1518:
1095:
997:
3688:
2852:
1771:
717:
Love to, but it will have to wait behind the dozens of other things I'd like to do. Maybe sometime.
433:
4051:
3427:
3415:
2594:
2447:
2405:
2293:
2073:
1706:
1654:
1570:
1274:
1203:
the National Socialist German Workers' Party, that however by most Europeans is held to have been
1139:
548:
134:. It would be better to categorize the History somewhat if you want to stress things like this. --
3673:
3447:
assignments etc. I may had a little go and add some of that myself later on today if I have time
2422:
political view that is neither mainstream nor considered correct. As far as I understand, this is
226:(this is only the 20th century). After that, follow the pattern with all other countries/regions.
4475:
4315:
4272:
4259:
4153:
4104:
4069:
4037:
3963:
3912:
3781:
You are severely mistaken. This is a common trope of the right-wing, and is counter-factual. See
3465:
2559:
2540:
2506:
2124:
2115:
2016:
1999:
1981:
1922:
1900:
690:
520:
494:
475:
467:
451:
343:
278:
230:
195:
188:
184:
162:
147:
131:
124:
4058:, et al.), it is not, but that is a subject for those dozens (or hundreds) of other articles. --
3092:
I agree that we should not refer to "Nazi" defeats. We should refer to German or Axis defeats.
2053:
2029:
1679:
1631:
1550:
1509:
427:
Because of its relatively short lifespan, historians sometimes call it the "Twelve-Year Reich."
4465:
4448:
4434:
4381:
4326:
4216:
4011:
3896:
3874:
3864:
3834:
3820:
3786:
3718:
3642:
3607:
3135:
2664:
2431:
1950:
1897:
1888:
1562:
1351:
1295:
1266:
1069:
918:
718:
708:
540:
223:
47:
17:
3308:
with the church is not a subject for inclusion on WP, not on Adolf Hitler and not anywhere.
1118:
1040:
article. It might also be moved farther down in the text to de-emphasize it if this is done.
603:. It isn't a style guide, it isn't a collection of foreign borrowings, etc., etc. It is an
3942:
3650:
3130:
3093:
3048:
2994:
2849:
But then again, neither do the communists, and we don't call them 'commies' in the wiki. --
2517:
2374:
2310:
2273:
2049:
1973:
1942:
1907:
1819:
1788:
1743:
1490:
872:
536:
339:
109:
664:
It's self-evident that non-involvement, non-commitment, or indirect support in the form of
4406:
4355:
4290:
4241:
4172:
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
3888:
3633:
3577:
I am almost certain it was the Nazis themselves. The spiritual value of three was part of
3569:
3519:
3504:
3448:
3344:
3190:
2146:
2102:
2011:
But the Nazis opposed socialism. How can you be a socialist if you are against socialism?
1540:
1187:
4129:
OK, I've posted a section on VPT. Hopefully they can figure it out. Thanks again.Ā :) --
3785:
article for a couple of academics deconstructing this nonsense and explaining the facts.
2997:, and their American lessor trials concerning Trading with The Enemy , never happened?
450:
This article should focus more on the 1930ās and Nazi domestic policy during the WWII. --
393:
First, Russians made things like Holocaust on much greater scale before WW2 even started.
3300:
3291:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/EffK/Evidence#3_December_2005
3213:
I refer any editors concerned with changes I make to sources povided through my recent
1701:
Care to cite that POV? Not that it matters, this whole Goebbels track is a red herring.
486:
And here's something for understanding the economy, another important chapter left out.
3619:
3615:
3578:
2714:
2652:
2590:
2547:
2443:
2401:
2289:
2069:
1823:
1774:
1702:
1650:
1566:
1526:
1494:
1476:
1439:
1335:
1322:
1270:
1192:
817:
544:
459:
194:
If you want to keep this page as more than a link page, you should consequently divide
4347:
but we can't have one of Poland? The one image of Poland gets removed after 1 Oct, 18
3808:
describes it as "an anti-socialist, anti-liberal, authoritarian, pro-business party";
4231:
to be extremely questionable, fist when I just added one image you removed it saying
4100:
3959:
3646:
3611:
3462:
3327:
3140:
2721:
2483:
2464:
1867:
1857:
1753:
1616:
1597:
1456:
1431:
1303:
1217:
1041:
1024:
845:
813:
807:
760:
674:
670:
608:
572:
258:
That's redundant. History of Germany can easily include a highly detailed account. --
199:
4367:
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-031-2436-03A, Russland, Hinrichtung von Partisanen-2.jpg
1377:
which they considered to be quite something else than Communism and Social Democracy
4458:
4444:
4430:
4374:
4335:
4319:
4258:
article in an encyclopedia, not a place to stuff in everyone's chosen information.
4224:
4004:
3892:
3860:
3813:
3372:
3263:
3200:
2970:
2933:
2782:
2613:
2198:
2163:
2065:
1739:
1603:
Hitler said, the Third Reich was a "people's republic"; (eine volkische Republik).
1536:
1066:
974:
926:
783:
632:
491:
271:
244:
207:
151:
97:
4483:
4469:
4452:
4438:
4410:
4385:
4359:
4330:
4294:
4267:
4245:
4206:
4161:
4146:
4133:
4124:
4112:
4086:
4077:
4062:
4045:
4030:
4015:
3997:
3967:
3946:
3920:
3900:
3882:
3868:
3853:
3824:
3794:
3753:
3711:
3701:
3691:
3676:
3662:
3653:
3636:
3622:
3585:
3572:
3536:
3522:
3507:
3468:
3451:
3433:
3386:
3321:
3266:
3228:
3203:
3193:
3151:
3112:
3096:
3086:
3051:
3030:
3017:
3003:
2940:
2915:
2890:
2866:
2840:
2767:
2692:
2667:
2632:
2377:
2343:
2313:
2250:
2201:
1921:
I just wanted to illustrate that Nazis DID in fact view themselves as socialists.
1000:
744:
703:
This should be an important article, but it has ended up being a brief history of
436:
3873:
Also I think you will find that most European sources call it right wing as well.
3771:
https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian
2647:
I admit my relative ignorance, but I do so far interpret the text in the article
1104:: ...Later, Deutsches Reich was the official name of Germany from 1871 to 1945...
3938:
3533:
3360:
3166:
3027:
2705:
That has too much of a revisionist sound to it. I would suggest something like:
2514:
2474:
2340:
2247:
2183:
1747:
1057:
942:
825:
778:
and finally appease Hitler through a English diplomat named Neville Chamberland.
741:
704:
665:
644:
584:
359:
282:
259:
248:
237:
166:
135:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4197:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. ā
1529:
1121:
816:
must be a mistake of some sort, as he died well before the NSDAP even existed.
669:
through the Molotow-Ribbentrop Pact was about to make all of the six remaining
4402:
4351:
4286:
4237:
4050:
Thanks. On this page, it appears to be so. On a ton of history pages (e.g.,
3801:
3185:
appears, replace its first mention in an article with "National Socialist (or
3082:
and a quarter million Soviet "volunteers" (Cossacks, Tsarists, POWs, etc.). --
2912:
2887:
2863:
2837:
2285:
2143:
Addressing the points you mentioned: 1) I agree 2) I agree 3) I almost agree.
1630:
And Dr. Goebbels was known for a) telling the truth? b) being a propagandist?
1505:
1428:
1033:
1016:
576:
300:
And last, Nuremberg was propaganda trial, what isn't clearly stated here. --]
466:
with āsee alsosā linking to articles that further elaborate on the topics. --
4426:
3383:
3318:
3225:
3000:
2937:
2281:
1861:
1649:
known for producing Nazi ideology, and is arguably the best source of such.
1501:
1291:
1210:
1135:
580:
1964:. If it is so clear that the Nazis thought of themselves as socialist then
1132:
837:
183:
No, we should definitely not repeat ourselves. The question is whether the
3223:
A History of the German Republic, a foundational historian in the subject.
1313:
I have read that academics view 'reich' usage nearly approximates that of
1209:
May be accidental, or not, but the issue is sufficiently explained at the
3377:
3296:
2558:
German it was more of an ethnic thing, although also fueled by ideology.
1531:" for example) and can be used by anyone to describe their product. The
1294:
within NSDAP. Please note that I did word it carefully, considering both
1257:
It is a quite old word, probably by the same root like the Indian "raj".
1181:
841:
612:
404:
384:
371:
335:
323:
315:
173:
155:
113:
2048:
Why do you keep using the euphemism "historical revisionism" instead of
3985:
3977:
2800:
2060:
Maybe because I'm not using a euphemism, and am actually talking about
1815:
1373:
No, no, the Nazi most definitely didn't call themselves Socialists but
1342:
No, no, the Nazi most definitely didn't call themselves Socialists but
1176:
955:
899:
859:"Third Reich" is the usual way of referring to it in English, and yes,
853:
849:
93:
1592:
Nazism is called the "Brown Creed". (brown refering to the brownshirt
1056:
Sources made available after the collapse of the Soviet Union reveals
587:(an all-you-can-eat buffet of mostly cold dishes, also from Swedish).
130:
I see the special role of this era, but it is an integral part of the
4152:
Ah, double redirects, that explains it. Glad it's straightened out.
3047:, the USSR was run rather differently, but that's a different issue.
1299:
1158:
1085:
Third paragraph should make clear "Third Reich" was just a nickname.
881:
403:
Fourth, most of accused officials had little to do with Holocaust. --
4099:
Actually, I think you should ask a question about this situation at
2911:
Anyone can edit, and sometimes they do. It's not there anymore. --
1317:
in english. However I think it is a specific german word without an
4215:
3126:
2536:
1314:
1171:
1154:
1101:
914:
894:
782:
Unfortunately I don't have time to sort this out myself right now.
568:
2763:
ultimately I don't know if it's really relevant who started it.--
2400:
please read the talk page. This has been discussed ad infinitum.
1607:...which demonstrates a lack of understanding for the concept of
1032:
This is propaganda-ish. Have a look at Wolfram's contributions.
946:). All I'm wondering about is why anyone would want to translate
4168:
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
2277:
1846:
1424:
1419:
236:
sjc, if you want to do it, go right ahead, I will follow you. --
161:
Yes, it should be a link page, pointing to various parts of the
575:(the joy over the failure of others). Then we have classes of
2532:
1435:
297:
Third, Germans didn't declare war on UK, it was the opposite.
219:
215:
25:
4401:
That would be a good option that I can definitely support. --
342:("De-Nazification")? It might be helpful in this context. --
3317:
editing. I at any rate, am prevented, but you can try ...
1593:
1563:
Talk:Nazi_Germany#National_Labour_Law_of_January_20.2C_1934
4338:
the Soviet Union has the following images in this article
2882:
Your message seems to have gotten truncated. Please note
3368:, and privately met Hitler in a shuttle back from Rome.
2513:
They felt they were being oppressed. Is that not enough?
1247:
I think it can be translated into Empire (Roman Empire =
2531:
So according to you DDR communists were not oppressive?
1966:
it should be present in mainstream historical literature
879:
I'm not quite sure I understand what you're getting at.
4276:
3697:
fixed. a few words appeared to be missing beforehand.--
3139:) due to economic aid by the United States of America (
2585:
Most Political Scientists think JFK is a Jelly Donut...
2152:
1500:
Hitler didn't just oppose social democracy, he opposed
1199:
4187:
National anthem of Nazi Germany, Horst Wessel Lied.oga
3954:
Lexlex, you linked to a mere essay, not a policy. Per
2993:. Why this blind-spotĀ ? Why are we behaving as if the
1493:, which is completely different from totalitarianism.
270:
I think we agree on most points. What I dislike about
165:
hierarchy. As it is, you find here more than there. --
4371:
File:Public execution of 54 Poles in Rożki (1942).jpg
3804:
has three sources describing the party as far-right.
2123:
Great points Paul, itās a really precise assessment.
2086:
3457:
Geography/Administrative organization of Third Reich
2655:
to indicate Goering's involvement to be most likely.
1082:
However, the term was officially banned since 1939.
4220:
Occupied Poland fully annexed into the German Reich
4142:
It appears to be fixed now via VPT. Thanks much!--
3062:
Description of tide turning a little too simplistic
1401:(which is what generally is understood by the term
950:with "third empire". I'd just delete the latter --
3911:a neutral reliable source.) This is a non-issue.
2901:why does it say this at the bottom of the page --
1953:I've already compiled? ] 09:46, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1489:BTW, I'm fine w pointing out that Hitler opposed
1229:The German names for France, UK and Austria are
973:Done.Ā :-) I wasn't quite aware that we agreed.
112:, it deals with a specific historical feature.
1746:? In our days' language usage, Goebbels was a
1225:The word "Reich" is not a big thing in German.
622:. I have added a link. I have also taken out
618:2002-04-29: For the record, that page exists:
3074:, which nevertheless did end badly for them.
1417:That is not correct. The limits are based on
423:Regarding this article's following sentence:
92:Is this really needed? This should all be in
8:
3125:"West Germany recovered economically by the
2969:Str1977 rejects this below as off topic to
620:List of German expressions in common English
3610:in 1919. He heavily infleunced people like
2153:I'm just going to jump right into this 2...
4285:which just sounds like a bogus argument.--
3411:Knowledge:German_Wikipedians'_notice_board
1334:pages, and out of the article name space.
539:. Contrast the above w what I said down @
3442:Life for the ordinary people in this time
3426:
3246:Houston Stewart Chamberlain, died in 1927
2717:article then does the closer examination.
2087:I'm just going to jump right into this...
154:and if they aren't they soon will be....
4233:"here's not room for another image here"
3728:Was the Nazi ideology really right wing?
3518:that the article is about "Nazi Germany"
1296:Talk:Nazi Germany#Socialist in name only
1267:Talk:Nazi Germany#Socialist in name only
3763:
3409:Since it is much needed, I created the
3118:Too much credit given to Marshall Plan?
2991:Rhenish-Westphalian Industrial Magnates
2783:Other Prominent persons in Nazi Germany
2160:totally ignoring the basis of socialism
1767:National Labour Law of January 20, 1934
627:were far more successful -- ie, deadly)
2948:] relevant discussion of dubious from
2660:I hope you can find a shorter wording!
1149:Third Reich translated as Third Empire
583:(a proxy official, from Swedish), and
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4474:I retoractively agree with swapping.
4312:Nazi crimes against the Polish nation
4120:appreciate it. Best of wishes.Ā :) --
3833:is clearly Democratic by that logic.
3831:Democratic People's Republic of Korea
3165:, as most of you probably know, is a
1879:not. Perhaps it should be clarified?
638:england declared war? eastern armies?
288:This argument has many false claims:
119:My point is: These things absolutely
7:
3740:power and the government has none.
3338:The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich
2922:The Dormancy change in Procedure etc
1896:Nazis not socialist? Well read this
541:Talk:Nazi_Germany#National_Socialism
187:, 1933 - 1945 should be part of the
4457:I've gone ahead with the change. ā
338:means. Do we have an article about
277:What's needed is some structure in
4423:Polish culture during World War II
4419:Expulsion of Poles by Nazi Germany
3598:in which he fantasised about some
3326:In continuation of this point see
571:(anxiety, feeling of despair) and
420:(german: "TausendjƤhriges Reich")
24:
3272:Civil Liberties are not the point
3234:Prominent persons in Nazi Germany
1899:, sounds pretty socialist to me.
1361:Your 1/2 right (almost exactlyĀ ;)
172:Do you want to do it or shall I?
3710:
3628:what were the first two reiches?
3249:Arthur de Gobineau, died in 1882
1157:definitely can be translated as
567:separate page? I'm thinking of
416:12 year reich or 1000 year reich
29:
3956:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
2873:sparta and nazi germany article
1738:ā give us a break ā what about
1198:The removal, at the same time,
3887:Diannaa is correct. BTW - the
3658:This is also in the article.--
2884:Knowledge:No original research
2711:Goering is reported to have...
2497:The article currently states:
836:"?? Shouldn't we delete this?
437:01:56, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
4016:14:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
3998:13:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
3968:20:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
3947:18:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
3537:21:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
3523:21:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
3508:20:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
3484:Problems with the term "Nazi"
3469:23:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
3452:06:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
3322:08:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
3267:10:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
3229:12:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
3204:09:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
3194:15:47, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
3152:00:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
3113:23:57, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
3097:00:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
3087:23:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
3004:11:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2941:11:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
2768:23:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
1015:Is the German Eagle usefulĀ ?
1001:23:05, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
601:Knowledge is not a dictionary
4484:02:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
4470:01:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
4453:00:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
4439:00:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
4411:00:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
4386:00:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
4360:23:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
4331:23:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
4295:23:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
4268:23:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
4246:23:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
4207:03:22, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
3921:15:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3901:14:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3883:10:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3869:07:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3854:06:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3825:05:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3795:05:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3754:04:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
3709:
3592:Arthur Moeller van den Bruck
3434:02:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
3252:Guido von List, died in 1919
3018:01:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
2221:under the thumb of the Party
1891:. ] 22:46, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
4227:, I find the argument that
4162:13:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4147:07:23, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4134:06:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4125:06:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4113:06:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4087:05:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4078:05:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4063:05:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4046:05:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
4031:05:09, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
3645:. The Second Reich was the
3594:wrote the influential book
3387:19:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
2916:01:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
2891:01:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
2867:02:18, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
2841:01:13, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1300:Nazism#Nazism and socialism
191:or not. I think it should.
127:, so why repeat them here?
106:History of the Roman Empire
4504:
4212:Oppression of ethnic Poles
3702:04:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
3692:07:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
3623:11:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
3429:File:UW Logo-secondary.gif
3031:01:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
2834:Knowledge:Use common names
2743:11:08:05, 2005-08-27 (UTC)
2603:) 18:03, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2456:) 17:16, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2414:) 15:40, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2378:00:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
2344:23:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
2202:01:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
2187:01:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
2167:07:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
1822:were repugnant to Nazi's.
1734:Goebbels "producing" Nazi-
1645:False dichotomy, Goebbels
1521:11:04:19, 2005-08-27 (UTC)
1283:) 15:37, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1169:In this context, the word
579:from other languages like
4036:I believe I've fixed it.
3677:11:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
3663:06:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
3654:19:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
3637:10:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
3632:what were the first two?
3606:and founded the infamous
3586:06:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
3573:10:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
3255:Karl Lueger, died in 1910
3209:Coalition decree issuance
3052:15:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
2562:16:09, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2554:02:33, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2543:16:39, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2528:22:51, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2520:16:02, 2004 Nov 18 (UTC)
2509:15:28, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2314:15:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
2251:08:42, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
2105:16:52, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2082:) 17:00, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1976:00:42, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1945:00:04, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1903:16:37, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1883:22:49, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1870:08:35, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
1826:16:03, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1750:rather than an ideologue.
1715:) 18:39, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1663:) 17:12, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1579:) 17:06, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1543:21:51, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1325:01.39 2nd Jan 2004 (UTC)
1220:15:21, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
1153:Although the German word
1036:18:43, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
1027:18:38, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
1019:18:32, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
875:23:47 Apr 30, 2003 (UTC)
856:23:40 Apr 30, 2003 (UTC)
763:04:53, 10 Sep 2003 (UTC)
745:08:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
557:) 08:39, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
497:12:00, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
470:23:05, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
462:22:15, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
454:21:48, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
4056:Battle of Kasserine Pass
3717:This is an Archive. See
3641:The First Reich was the
3404:German Wiki Notice Board
2803:14:32, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2724:18:43, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
2616:05:47, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
2570:18:02, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2486:08:24, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
2477:08:01, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2467:08:22, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
2396:Socialist in name only 2
2284:, most notably the Anti-
2149:05:24, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
2127:18:34, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2118:18:38, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2056:22:30, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
2032:22:33, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
2019:16:04, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2002:03:26, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1984:15:08, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1925:03:27, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1910:20:50, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1834:21:47, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1791:15:51, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1777:20:57, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1756:08:53, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
1619:08:39, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
1553:16:51, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1512:22:16, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1497:20:37, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1338:02:50, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1306:19:56, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
1142:17:23, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1044:18:52, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
902:23:56 Apr 30, 2003 (UTC)
820:11:05, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
786:09:16, 10 Sep 2003 (UTC)
711:14:16, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
677:08:53, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
523:05:31, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
478:08:53, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
88:Old discussion from 2001
3604:Conservative Revolution
3528:Knowledge policy is to
3395:international relations
2693:01:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
2668:10:13, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
2633:08:10, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
2434:17:04, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2135:19:27, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1889:Talk:Nazi_Germany#facts
1682:17:14, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1634:16:51, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1533:Socialist International
1479:20:35, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1459:18:58, 2004 Nov 6 (UTC)
1442:15:49, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1354:10:55, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1072:10:15, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
958:00:12 May 1, 2003 (UTC)
721:14:31, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
4308:Knowledge:Article size
4275:, as late as 1 Oct, 18
4221:
3179:Nationalsozialistische
2493:Communist East Germany
2426:what Knowledge should
2062:Historical revisionism
2040:Historical revisionism
1934:Historical revisionism
1329:Socialist in name only
4219:
4022:Flag in info box ....
3600:Deutscher Sozialismus
3103:Not a "Nazi war flag"
2791:, why did you remove
2707:It's commonly held...
1970:reactionary modernism
1201:of the qualification
42:of past discussions.
3336:page 249, fair use,
3278:Centre Party Germany
3169:of the German words
3122:The article states:
2950:Centre Party Germany
2903:unsigned comment by
2851:unsigned comment by
2813:unsigned comment by
2535:is as oppressive as
1375:National Socialists,
1344:National Socialists,
1096:Wilhelm I of Germany
657:, 09:36, 2004 Dec 28
655:user:217.255.124.138
4177:Deutschlandlied.ogg
4052:Battle of the Bulge
3791:click to talk to me
3590:In 1923 the author
3366:Letter of Guarantee
3349:Letter of Guarantee
3340:, pan Books 1959.
3129:, being called the
2294:Paul von Hindenburg
1860:is not the same as
869:Deutsche Reichsbahn
212:German Post-War Era
4316:General Government
4222:
4199:Community Tech bot
3009:National Socialism
2905:User:81.231.226.58
1874:National Socialism
1077:Term "Third Reich"
279:History of Germany
231:History of Germany
196:History of Germany
189:History of Germany
185:History of Germany
163:History of Germany
148:History of Germany
132:History of Germany
125:History of Germany
108:is separated from
3934:Neutrality Policy
3733:(conservative).
3725:
3724:
3721:for current talk
3719:Talk:Nazi Germany
3643:Holy Roman Empire
3282:Atkins and Tallet
3136:Wirtschaftswunder
2907:
2897:"I am not a NAZI"
2855:
2828:
2440:Cite your sources
2288:movement and the
1887:Perhaps not. See
1796:Scroll up and see
919:Holy Roman Empire
458:I strongly agree
224:Reunified Germany
204:Weimarer Republic
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:Talk:Nazi Germany
4495:
4463:
4379:
4324:
4229:"here's no room"
4145:
4132:
4123:
4085:
4061:
4029:
4009:
3847:
3844:
3841:
3838:
3818:
3773:
3768:
3714:
3707:
3706:
3596:Das Dritte Reich
3530:use common names
3432:
3430:
3219:Alfred Rosenberg
3131:economic miracle
2995:Nuremburg Trials
2989:With a link to
2902:
2850:
2812:
2799:from the list?--
2568:Comrade Tassadar
2552:Comrade Tassadar
2526:Comrade Tassadar
2274:Erich Ludendorff
2133:Comrade Tassadar
2050:holocaust denial
1881:Comrade Tassadar
1832:Comrade Tassadar
1820:Social democracy
1744:Alfred Rosenberg
1491:Social democracy
1434:, not editorial
1389:That is correct.
1091:Some references:
767:Pre-WWII history
684:english spelling
537:holocaust denial
340:Entnazifizierung
329:I remember that
110:History of Italy
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4503:
4502:
4498:
4497:
4496:
4494:
4493:
4492:
4461:
4377:
4322:
4214:
4170:
4143:
4130:
4121:
4083:
4059:
4027:
4024:
4007:
3982:
3889:Talk:Nazi Party
3845:
3842:
3839:
3836:
3816:
3778:
3777:
3776:
3769:
3765:
3730:
3684:
3670:
3630:
3566:
3557:
3486:
3459:
3444:
3428:
3407:
3397:
3345:Reichskonkordat
3305:civil liberties
3274:
3236:
3211:
3159:
3120:
3105:
3064:
3011:
3006:
2963:
2924:
2899:
2875:
2809:
2789:User:Punkmorten
2786:
2622:
2609:
2607:Evil Web Vandal
2587:
2495:
2398:
2155:
2089:
1876:
1769:
1586:
1557:Except that it
1331:
1227:
1188:Weimar Republic
1151:
1094:Name of Reich:
1079:
892:, not just any
829:
811:
769:
757:
740:mmmm, dinner --
730:
701:
686:
640:
564:
503:
501:civilian deaths
448:
418:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4501:
4499:
4491:
4490:
4489:
4488:
4487:
4486:
4441:
4425:and operation
4399:
4398:
4397:
4396:
4395:
4394:
4393:
4392:
4391:
4390:
4389:
4388:
4213:
4210:
4195:
4194:
4184:
4169:
4166:
4165:
4164:
4141:
4139:
4138:
4137:
4136:
4116:
4115:
4096:
4095:
4094:
4093:
4092:
4091:
4090:
4089:
4023:
4020:
4019:
4018:
3981:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3927:
3926:
3925:
3924:
3923:
3871:
3827:
3797:
3775:
3774:
3762:
3761:
3757:
3729:
3726:
3723:
3722:
3715:
3705:
3704:
3683:
3680:
3669:
3666:
3649:of 1871-1918.
3629:
3626:
3616:Ernst Niekisch
3579:Nazi mysticism
3565:
3562:
3556:
3553:
3540:
3539:
3511:
3510:
3485:
3482:
3477:
3472:
3458:
3455:
3443:
3440:
3438:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3393:
3391:
3273:
3270:
3260:
3259:
3256:
3253:
3250:
3247:
3244:
3243:Richard Wagner
3235:
3232:
3210:
3207:
3158:
3155:
3119:
3116:
3104:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3072:by the Germans
3069:
3063:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3054:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3010:
3007:
2999:
2987:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2962:
2961:Industrialists
2959:
2954:
2953:
2923:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2898:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2874:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2859:
2858:
2857:
2856:
2853:User:Andrelvis
2844:
2843:
2815:157.157.79.109
2808:
2805:
2785:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2718:
2715:Reichstag fire
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2686:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2671:
2670:
2661:
2657:
2656:
2653:Reichstag fire
2644:
2643:
2621:
2620:Reichstag Fire
2618:
2608:
2605:
2586:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2503:
2502:
2494:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2481:
2469:
2468:
2462:
2436:
2435:
2397:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2290:Harzburg Front
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2170:
2169:
2154:
2151:
2139:
2137:
2136:
2128:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2088:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1893:
1892:
1875:
1872:
1865:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1768:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1751:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1621:
1620:
1614:
1585:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1527:shredded wheat
1523:
1522:
1504:and supported
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1454:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1432:expert sources
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1356:
1355:
1330:
1327:
1323:user:max rspct
1321:equivalent -
1312:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1285:
1284:
1262:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1193:User:Sam Spade
1175:is rather the
1150:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:Mikko Paananen
1137:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1099:
1092:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1014:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
933:
932:
931:
930:
904:
903:
830:
828:
824:OLD TALK From
822:
810:
805:
804:
795:
790:
789:
788:
787:
768:
765:
756:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
729:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
700:
697:
695:
685:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
659:
658:
652:
639:
636:
629:
628:
616:
597:
563:
560:
559:
558:
511:
502:
499:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
447:
444:
417:
414:
410:
409:
408:
407:
401:
398:
394:
388:
387:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
356:
355:
354:
353:
347:
346:
319:
318:
311:
310:
306:
286:
268:
263:
256:
252:
241:
181:
177:
170:
159:
139:
117:
102:
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4500:
4485:
4481:
4477:
4476:Beyond My Ken
4473:
4472:
4471:
4467:
4460:
4456:
4455:
4454:
4450:
4446:
4442:
4440:
4436:
4432:
4428:
4424:
4420:
4415:
4414:
4413:
4412:
4408:
4404:
4387:
4383:
4376:
4372:
4368:
4363:
4362:
4361:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4346:
4343:
4340:
4337:
4334:
4333:
4332:
4328:
4321:
4317:
4313:
4309:
4304:
4300:
4299:
4298:
4297:
4296:
4292:
4288:
4284:
4280:
4277:
4274:
4273:Beyond My Ken
4271:
4270:
4269:
4265:
4261:
4260:Beyond My Ken
4257:
4256:
4250:
4249:
4248:
4247:
4243:
4239:
4234:
4230:
4226:
4218:
4211:
4209:
4208:
4204:
4200:
4192:
4188:
4185:
4182:
4178:
4175:
4174:
4173:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4155:
4154:Beyond My Ken
4151:
4150:
4149:
4148:
4135:
4128:
4127:
4126:
4118:
4117:
4114:
4110:
4106:
4105:Beyond My Ken
4102:
4098:
4097:
4088:
4081:
4080:
4079:
4075:
4071:
4070:Beyond My Ken
4066:
4065:
4064:
4057:
4053:
4049:
4048:
4047:
4043:
4039:
4038:Beyond My Ken
4035:
4034:
4033:
4032:
4021:
4017:
4013:
4006:
4002:
4001:
4000:
3999:
3995:
3991:
3987:
3979:
3975:
3969:
3965:
3961:
3957:
3953:
3952:
3951:
3950:
3949:
3948:
3944:
3940:
3935:
3922:
3918:
3914:
3913:Beyond My Ken
3910:
3909:
3904:
3903:
3902:
3898:
3894:
3890:
3886:
3885:
3884:
3880:
3876:
3872:
3870:
3866:
3862:
3857:
3856:
3855:
3852:
3849:
3848:
3832:
3828:
3826:
3822:
3815:
3811:
3807:
3803:
3798:
3796:
3792:
3788:
3784:
3780:
3779:
3772:
3767:
3764:
3760:
3756:
3755:
3751:
3747:
3741:
3737:
3734:
3727:
3720:
3716:
3713:
3708:
3703:
3700:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3690:
3682:Social Policy
3681:
3679:
3678:
3675:
3667:
3665:
3664:
3661:
3656:
3655:
3652:
3648:
3647:German Empire
3644:
3639:
3638:
3635:
3627:
3625:
3624:
3621:
3617:
3613:
3612:Otto Strasser
3609:
3605:
3601:
3597:
3593:
3588:
3587:
3584:
3580:
3575:
3574:
3571:
3563:
3561:
3554:
3552:
3548:
3544:
3538:
3535:
3531:
3527:
3526:
3525:
3524:
3521:
3515:
3509:
3506:
3501:
3497:
3492:
3491:
3490:
3483:
3481:
3476:
3471:
3470:
3467:
3464:
3456:
3454:
3453:
3450:
3441:
3439:
3436:
3435:
3431:
3425:
3423:
3422:
3417:
3412:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3394:
3392:
3389:
3388:
3385:
3381:
3379:
3374:
3369:
3367:
3362:
3356:
3352:
3350:
3346:
3341:
3339:
3335:
3331:
3329:
3328:Pope Pius XII
3324:
3323:
3320:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3302:
3301:Hitler's Pope
3298:
3293:
3292:
3288:
3287:
3283:
3279:
3271:
3269:
3268:
3265:
3257:
3254:
3251:
3248:
3245:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3233:
3231:
3230:
3227:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3208:
3206:
3205:
3202:
3196:
3195:
3192:
3188:
3184:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3168:
3164:
3157:Article title
3156:
3154:
3153:
3150:
3144:
3142:
3141:Marshall Plan
3138:
3137:
3133:(German term
3132:
3128:
3123:
3117:
3115:
3114:
3111:
3102:
3098:
3095:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3085:
3081:
3080:Division Azul
3075:
3073:
3067:
3061:
3053:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3041:
3040:
3039:
3038:
3037:
3032:
3029:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3016:
3008:
3005:
3002:
2998:
2996:
2992:
2982:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2975:
2974:
2972:
2968:
2960:
2958:
2951:
2947:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2939:
2935:
2930:
2921:
2917:
2914:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2906:
2896:
2892:
2889:
2885:
2881:
2880:
2879:
2872:
2868:
2865:
2861:
2860:
2854:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2842:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2826:
2823:
2820:
2816:
2806:
2804:
2802:
2798:
2794:
2790:
2784:
2781:
2769:
2766:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2742:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2723:
2719:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2694:
2691:
2687:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2669:
2666:
2662:
2659:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2631:
2626:
2619:
2617:
2615:
2606:
2604:
2602:
2599:
2596:
2592:
2584:
2569:
2564:
2563:
2561:
2560:GeneralPatton
2556:
2555:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2544:
2542:
2541:GeneralPatton
2538:
2534:
2530:
2529:
2527:
2522:
2521:
2519:
2516:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2508:
2507:MatthewWilcox
2500:
2499:
2498:
2492:
2485:
2479:
2478:
2476:
2471:
2470:
2466:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2455:
2452:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2413:
2410:
2407:
2403:
2395:
2379:
2376:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2345:
2342:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2315:
2312:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2252:
2249:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2226:
2222:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2203:
2200:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2168:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2156:
2150:
2148:
2144:
2141:
2134:
2129:
2126:
2125:GeneralPatton
2122:
2117:
2116:GeneralPatton
2112:
2111:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2081:
2078:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2055:
2051:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2031:
2018:
2017:GeneralPatton
2013:
2012:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2001:
2000:GeneralPatton
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1983:
1982:GeneralPatton
1978:
1977:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1954:
1952:
1947:
1946:
1944:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1935:
1924:
1923:GeneralPatton
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1902:
1901:GeneralPatton
1898:
1895:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1882:
1873:
1871:
1869:
1863:
1859:
1858:Corporativism
1848:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1833:
1828:
1827:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1812:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1776:
1772:
1766:
1755:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1714:
1711:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1662:
1659:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1633:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1618:
1613:
1611:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1598:working class
1595:
1590:
1583:
1578:
1575:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1552:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1528:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1498:
1496:
1492:
1478:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1458:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1378:
1374:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1328:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1261:
1260:frapowierski
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1232:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1214:
1212:
1208:
1207:by name only.
1204:
1200:
1196:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1148:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1076:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1002:
999:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
976:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
957:
953:
949:
945:
944:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
928:
924:
923:Drittes Reich
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:
906:
905:
901:
897:
896:
891:
889:
884:
883:
878:
877:
876:
874:
870:
866:
862:
857:
855:
851:
847:
846:Reichskanzler
843:
839:
835:
827:
823:
821:
819:
815:
814:Wilhelm Grimm
809:
808:Wilhelm Grimm
806:
803:
802:
798:
794:
793:
785:
781:
780:
779:
775:
774:
773:
766:
764:
762:
754:
746:
743:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
727:
720:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
710:
706:
698:
696:
693:
692:
691:Robert Merkel
683:
676:
672:
671:border states
667:
663:
662:
661:
660:
656:
653:
649:
648:
647:
646:
637:
635:
634:
625:
624:
623:
621:
615:
614:
610:
609:schadenfreude
606:
605:encyclopedia.
602:
596:
592:
588:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:schadenfreude
570:
561:
556:
553:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
524:
522:
521:GeneralPatton
517:
514:
510:
507:
500:
498:
496:
495:GeneralPatton
492:
490:
487:
477:
476:GeneralPatton
472:
471:
469:
468:GeneralPatton
464:
463:
461:
457:
456:
455:
453:
452:GeneralPatton
445:
443:
439:
438:
435:
429:
428:
424:
421:
415:
413:
406:
402:
399:
395:
392:
391:
390:
389:
386:
381:
380:
373:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
344:Magnus Manske
341:
337:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
317:
313:
312:
307:
303:
302:
301:
298:
295:
292:
289:
285:
284:
280:
275:
273:
267:
262:
261:
255:
251:
250:
246:
240:
239:
234:
232:
227:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:German Empire
197:
192:
190:
186:
180:
176:
175:
169:
168:
164:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
138:
137:
133:
128:
126:
122:
116:
115:
111:
107:
101:
99:
95:
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4400:
4302:
4282:
4254:
4253:
4232:
4228:
4223:
4196:
4171:
4140:
4025:
3983:
3931:
3907:
3906:
3875:Slatersteven
3835:
3810:this article
3806:This article
3787:Peacemaker67
3766:
3758:
3742:
3738:
3735:
3731:
3699:68.81.242.37
3685:
3671:
3668:Coat of Arms
3660:68.81.242.37
3657:
3640:
3631:
3599:
3595:
3589:
3583:68.81.242.37
3576:
3567:
3558:
3549:
3545:
3541:
3516:
3512:
3499:
3495:
3487:
3478:
3473:
3460:
3445:
3437:
3419:
3414:
3408:
3398:
3390:
3373:Enabling Act
3370:
3365:
3357:
3353:
3348:
3342:
3337:
3333:
3325:
3314:
3309:
3304:
3294:
3285:
3281:
3275:
3261:
3237:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3212:
3197:
3186:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3162:
3160:
3145:
3134:
3124:
3121:
3106:
3079:
3076:
3071:
3068:
3065:
3044:
3012:
2988:
2980:
2971:Enabling Act
2966:
2965:I note that
2964:
2955:
2934:Enabling Act
2928:
2925:
2900:
2876:
2821:
2810:
2796:
2792:
2787:
2710:
2706:
2690:210.8.216.82
2665:Johan Magnus
2649:specifically
2648:
2639:
2630:203.17.44.84
2627:
2623:
2610:
2597:
2588:
2504:
2496:
2450:
2437:
2432:Johan Magnus
2427:
2423:
2419:
2408:
2399:
2305:
2224:
2220:
2181:
2159:
2145:
2142:
2138:
2101:
2097:
2095:purpose is.
2093:
2090:
2076:
2066:Totalitarian
2047:
2026:
1965:
1962:find another
1961:
1957:
1932:
1877:
1856:
1804:
1783:
1770:
1740:Adolf Hitler
1735:
1709:
1657:
1646:
1622:
1608:
1602:
1591:
1587:
1573:
1558:
1548:
1545:
1537:collectivism
1524:
1499:
1488:
1418:
1404:
1400:
1376:
1372:
1352:Johan Magnus
1347:
1343:
1332:
1318:
1311:
1277:
1259:
1256:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1230:
1228:
1215:
1206:
1202:
1197:
1186:
1180:
1170:
1168:
1162:
1152:
1084:
1080:
1055:
1054:
1013:
951:
947:
941:
922:
910:
893:
887:
886:
880:
868:
864:
860:
858:
833:
831:
812:
801:
797:
796:
792:
791:
776:
770:
758:
755:Book of Odin
731:
728:Panzer tanks
719:DJ Clayworth
709:DJ Clayworth
702:
699:wwII history
694:
687:
641:
630:
617:
604:
598:
593:
589:
565:
551:
532:
525:
518:
515:
512:
508:
504:
488:
485:
449:
440:
430:
426:
425:
422:
419:
411:
357:
334:that's what
330:
320:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
276:
272:Nazi Germany
269:
264:
257:
253:
245:Nazi Germany
242:
235:
228:
208:Nazi Germany
193:
182:
178:
171:
160:
152:World War II
143:
140:
129:
120:
118:
103:
98:World War II
91:
60:
43:
37:
4144:Surv1v4l1st
4131:Surv1v4l1st
4122:Surv1v4l1st
4084:Surv1v4l1st
4060:Surv1v4l1st
4028:Surv1v4l1st
3990:2.24.71.140
3980:wikilink???
3564:Third Reich
3520:Banana.girl
3505:Banana.girl
3449:Banana.girl
3361:Ludwig Kaas
3286:15 December
3167:portmanteau
3045:In practice
3015:GinAndTonic
2807:New section
2068:socialism.
2015:communists.
1974:Fastfission
1943:Fastfission
1908:Fastfission
1789:Fastfission
1784:even though
1748:spin doctor
1403:Socialism).
1348:Socialism).
1235:Vereinigtes
1058:the Kremlin
948:Third Reich
943:Third Reich
909:In German,
826:Third Reich
705:World War 2
666:appeasement
645:user:szopen
585:smorgasbord
562:linguistics
36:This is an
4278:this image
4191:discussion
4181:discussion
3802:Nazi Party
3759:References
3746:Aluaxelman
3634:Kingturtle
3570:Kingturtle
3149:Critic9328
3110:Critic9328
3108:German).--
3084:Critic9328
2797:Wallenberg
2765:Critic9328
2741:Marcel1975
2286:Young Plan
1565:. Cheers,
1519:Marcel1975
1506:capitalism
1429:verifiable
1242:Ćsterreich
1238:Kƶnigreich
1231:Frankreich
998:Critic9328
977:2003-05-01
929:2003-04-30
863:does mean
577:loan words
4427:AB-Aktion
4283:"no room"
3689:Enzedrail
3620:Teodorico
3175:Socialist
2946:See Also
2793:Schindler
2591:SamĀ Spade
2444:SamĀ Spade
2442:, buck-o.
2402:SamĀ Spade
2282:Stahlhelm
2140:Comrade:
2070:SamĀ Spade
1862:Socialism
1703:SamĀ Spade
1651:SamĀ Spade
1567:SamĀ Spade
1502:socialism
1292:Socialism
1271:Sam_Spade
1249:Rƶmisches
1211:Socialism
1205:Socialist
952:ersatzlos
848:yes, but
818:Kent Wang
581:ombudsman
545:SamĀ Spade
434:Spookfish
123:to be in
80:ArchiveĀ 5
72:ArchiveĀ 3
67:ArchiveĀ 2
61:ArchiveĀ 1
3960:Dimadick
3932:Per the
3608:Juniklub
3498:tionalso
3421:ĪĪĪĪĪĪĪĪ£
3416:Calgacus
3378:Holy See
3297:Holy See
3171:National
2929:left off
2825:contribs
2722:Ruhrjung
2601:contribs
2484:Ruhrjung
2465:Ruhrjung
2454:contribs
2412:contribs
2300:and the
2280:and the
2225:National
2080:contribs
1956:Did you
1868:Ruhrjung
1754:Ruhrjung
1736:ideology
1713:contribs
1661:contribs
1617:Ruhrjung
1610:vƶlkisch
1577:contribs
1457:Ruhrjung
1427:'s, and
1304:Ruhrjung
1281:contribs
1218:Ruhrjung
1182:republic
1042:Ark30inf
1025:Ark30inf
842:dictator
761:Ark30inf
675:Ruhrjung
555:contribs
4459:Diannaa
4445:Kierzek
4431:Kierzek
4375:Diannaa
4336:Diannaa
4320:Diannaa
4225:Diannaa
4005:Diannaa
3986:Germany
3984:Why is
3978:Germany
3976:why no
3893:Kierzek
3861:Rjensen
3814:Diannaa
3674:Gomeira
3264:Str1977
3221:, 1936
3215:history
3201:Str1977
3143:),..."
2651:on the
2614:Husnock
2424:exactly
2199:Bky1701
2164:Bky1701
1816:Marxism
1177:antonym
1067:Mintguy
975:djmutex
927:djmutex
850:Emperor
832:"Third
784:Mintguy
633:djmutex
474:here.--
150:and/or
100:, etc.
94:Germany
39:archive
4344:, and
4255:survey
4101:WP:VPT
3939:Lexlex
3851:(talk)
3651:john k
3534:SimonP
3330:/talk
3147:War.--
3094:john k
3049:john k
3028:Hohns3
2518:(Talk)
2515:Joseph
2475:Szopen
2461:issue.
2430:do. --
2375:john k
2341:Hohns3
2311:john k
2248:Hohns3
2184:Hohns3
1596:, the
1561:, see
1213:page.
1159:empire
888:Kaiser
882:Empire
865:empire
838:FĆ¼hrer
834:empire
742:Hohns3
360:Chenyu
283:Yooden
260:Yooden
249:Yooden
238:Yooden
167:Yooden
146:be in
136:Yooden
4403:E-960
4369:with
4352:E-960
4287:E-960
4238:E-960
3463:mikka
3127:1960s
2913:Curps
2888:Curps
2864:Curps
2838:Curps
2638:This
2539:was?
2537:Stasi
2054:AndyL
2030:AndyL
1951:facts
1680:AndyL
1632:AndyL
1584:facts
1551:AndyL
1510:AndyL
1420:facts
1319:exact
1315:realm
1252:Reich
1172:Reich
1161:, in
1155:Reich
1134:also
1102:Reich
1034:Ericd
1017:Ericd
954:. --
925:. --
915:Reich
911:Reich
898:. --
895:Reich
890:reich
873:Arwel
871:. --
861:Reich
852:? --
800:room.
569:angst
446:focus
16:<
4480:talk
4466:talk
4449:talk
4435:talk
4407:talk
4382:talk
4373:? ā
4356:talk
4327:talk
4314:and
4303:your
4291:talk
4264:talk
4242:talk
4203:talk
4158:talk
4109:talk
4074:talk
4042:talk
4012:talk
3994:talk
3964:talk
3943:talk
3917:talk
3897:talk
3879:talk
3865:talk
3829:And
3821:talk
3783:this
3750:talk
3555:Ughh
3384:EffK
3319:EffK
3310:Some
3226:EffK
3191:Paul
3187:Nazi
3183:Nazi
3173:and
3163:Nazi
3001:EffK
2981:Mefo
2938:EffK
2819:talk
2795:and
2713:The
2595:talk
2548:NPOV
2448:talk
2406:talk
2278:DNVP
2147:Paul
2103:Paul
2074:talk
1958:look
1847:cite
1742:and
1707:talk
1655:talk
1571:talk
1541:Paul
1425:cite
1302:. --
1298:and
1275:talk
1265:See
1240:and
1163:some
599:But
549:talk
533:that
531:Now
331:some
247:. --
144:also
121:have
3908:not
3846:Fir
3843:een
3840:rgr
3837:Eve
3614:or
3503:up.
3466:(t)
3315:any
2709:or
2533:FBI
2428:not
2420:one
2306:did
2302:SPD
2298:KPD
1824:Sam
1818:or
1775:Sam
1559:was
1495:Sam
1477:Sam
1440:Sam
1436:POV
1336:Sam
1244:.
1185:in
1179:of
1070:(T)
885:is
631:--
613:LMS
543:;)
535:is
460:Sam
405:Taw
385:JHK
372:Taw
336:Taw
324:SJK
316:JHK
220:DDR
216:BRD
198:in
174:sjc
156:sjc
114:sjc
4482:)
4468:)
4462:š
4451:)
4437:)
4421:,
4409:)
4384:)
4378:š
4358:)
4341:,
4329:)
4323:š
4293:)
4266:)
4244:)
4205:)
4160:)
4111:)
4076:)
4054:,
4044:)
4014:)
4008:š
3996:)
3966:)
3945:)
3919:)
3899:)
3881:)
3867:)
3823:)
3817:š
3793:)
3752:)
3500:zi
3496:Na
3289:],
2801:AI
2720:--
2688:--
2663:--
2640:is
2628:--
2482:--
2463:--
2339:--
2246:--
2182:--
1866:--
1752:--
1647:is
1615:--
1600:)
1594:SA
1455:--
1438:.
1423:,
1233:,
1216:--
1120:,
1117:,
956:KF
900:KF
854:KF
844:,
840:,
689:--
519:--
493:--
233:.
222:,
214:,
210:,
206:,
202:,
96:,
76:ā
4478:(
4464:(
4447:(
4433:(
4405:(
4380:(
4354:(
4325:(
4289:(
4262:(
4240:(
4201:(
4193:)
4189:(
4183:)
4179:(
4156:(
4107:(
4072:(
4040:(
4010:(
3992:(
3962:(
3941:(
3915:(
3895:(
3877:(
3863:(
3819:(
3789:(
3748:(
3424:)
3418:(
3177:(
2952:.
2827:)
2822:Ā·
2817:(
2612:-
2598:Ā·
2593:(
2451:Ā·
2446:(
2409:Ā·
2404:(
2077:Ā·
2072:(
2038:"
1864:.
1807:"
1803:"
1710:Ā·
1705:(
1658:Ā·
1653:(
1612:.
1574:Ā·
1569:(
1278:Ā·
1273:(
1190:.
552:Ā·
547:(
218:/
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.