657:
393:
805:. More can certainly be added to the article if you'd like. As for "whitewashing", that is a very apt description of what you are attempting. Blandly describing a foreign policy that seeks to grab territory, support jihadis, and redraw the map of the Middle East as "a political, social and economic philosophy that, in its broadest sense, accepts the Ottoman past as a reference point for the present and the future" is whitewashing to put it mildly. And "so what" is not an argument. Btw what is IGI Global? Who is the author of the piece you are citing?
832:... a leading international academic publisher committed to facilitating the discovery of pioneering research that enhances and expands the body of knowledge available to the research community. Working in close collaboration with expert researchers and professionals from leading institutions, including Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Harvard University, Stanford University, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford, Tsinghua University, and Australian National University...
243:
222:
881:
355:
331:
678:". The source clearly indicates that Turkey is also perceived by others like the only heir of the Ottoman Empire. Not only by itself. I would avoid statement which say what Turkey thinks or sees despite the expressions used in sources. Turkey is country. A country can not see or think or promote. Political ideology can promote. That is my opinion, but I am very open to hear other opinions of course.--
253:
191:
442:
421:
522:
Ottoman Empire was not
Turkish ruled. OE was not a nation state, but empire which included a lot of different nations. There were Greeks, Albanians, Serbs,.... who were highly positioned in Ottoman hierarchy. Also, readers could be mislead that Ottoman Empire was divided on areas controlled by ethnic
783:
3. So what? Those two things aren't mutually exclusive. YOU may think that the government is promoting Neo-Ottomanism. Heck, the government might even (deliberately or undeliberately) really promote Neo-Ottomanism. But this doesn't change the fact that key policy makers of the government expressed
753:
on the grounds that it 1) removed a scholarly source (Middle East
Critique), 2) is a pretty obvious attempt to sanitize and whitewash the topic, and 3) introduced the absurdity that Neo-Ottomanism is rejected by the Erdogan government, when it is plain as day that is in fact the Erdogan government
958:
While I have other concerns with this article, I know my opinions on this matter are outside academic consensus in some places, so I will simply be pointing out that "Islamist" has been added without discussion or sourcing. We've had this discussion before in the AKP page, and no one has provided
570:
846:
By saying things like neo-ottomanism is about "supporting jihadis", your molding the term to the recent
Erdogan foreign policy (as perceived by some), while neo-ottomanism is larger than that. The term is way older than any Erdogan government
897:. The editor is urged to refrain from further disruption like this as it appear to be an whitewashing attempt of a doctrine for which the international media report to be nationalist, Islamist and expansionist in its core. ---
599:
might be seen by somebody as publisher non-neutral from the subject. I don't know much about situation in Turkey. Who is the author of the text in that journal? Are there some additional sources which support such exceptional
823:. (2) This is the most funny part: You didn't even read the available abstract. As it literally states that the term has "wide range of interpretations". Yet you try to mold it in a single particular interpretation.
153:
913:
Also I took the time and updated abit the article by adding more sources from journalists and analysts across the world confirming the doctrine's expansionist and interventionist nature. Good day.---
674:
Thank you for your reply. Murat Somer is scholar who is authoritative in this field and can be regarded as RS (reliable source). I think that above mentioned sources can be used to support the claim "
934:
I suggest deletion of anything related to
Erdogan and AKP without references in this article. Erdogan and his party AKP was completely against the ideology of Nationalism until its coalition at 2018.
860:
And yes, "so what" is an argument when you fail to prove the relevancy of one thing to another. Government says A, but does B (according to you). This doesn't give you the right to delete A or B. --
819:
Your reply makes 2 things clear. (1) You haven't read the source beyond the title. Because the "Imperial
Grandeur and Selective Memory" isn't referring to neo-ottomanism, but about the public.
650:
In the same vein, Davutoglu argues that Turkey is the natural heir to the
Ottoman Empire that once unified the Muslim world and therefore has the potential to become a Muslim regional power.
1043:
492:
482:
518:
Neo-Ottomanism (Turkish: Yeni Osmanlıcılık) is a political ideology that in its broadest sense, promotes greater engagement with formerly
Turkish ruled areas of the Ottoman Empire.
1048:
597:"holds the conviction that the process of European integration is of crucial importance for Turkey, and that belonging solidly in the transatlantic security and value frameworks"
1023:
458:
1038:
147:
1033:
367:
449:
426:
555:
I agree if such statement is well sourced. Though, in that case I would say "a political ideology which sees Turkey as the only heir of the
Ottoman Empire."--
366:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
1028:
780:
2. I can't even take this point seriously. I'm not sure how it is "sanitized" and "whitewashed" here, but everybody is entitled to their own opinion I guess.
79:
526:
Therefore I propose to replace "with formerly
Turkish ruled areas of the Ottoman Empire" with "in territories which once belonged to Ottoman Empire".--
1018:
1013:
1003:
303:
313:
362:
336:
44:
1008:
777:. The only way your version will survive is to download the journal as I did, and pinpoint to me the page and text matching the text in Wiki.
85:
402:
341:
731:
710:
279:
820:
998:
959:
good enough sourcing for a claim like this. If the situation is the same here, I do not see a reason why "Islamist" should stay.
275:
99:
30:
168:
104:
20:
135:
74:
588:
266:
227:
202:
392:
683:
605:
560:
531:
65:
624:
Sustainable
Democratization and The Roles of The U.S.and The EU: Political Islam and Kurdish Nationalism in Turkey
935:
129:
735:
714:
454:
109:
802:
Grandeur"? Anyway, it's not hard to find additional sources about the imperialist nature of Neo-Ottomanism
125:
679:
601:
556:
541:
Agree. But I think we'd better add the sentence: "Turkey sees itself as only heir of the Ottoman Empire."
527:
208:
769:
1. The source itself is not the problem. The problem is false citing. It's abusing the source to write
175:
937:
727:
706:
676:
political ideology that in its broadest sense, promotes Turkey as the only heir of the Ottoman Empire
190:
915:
899:
161:
55:
457:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
278:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
979:
964:
770:
70:
623:
810:
759:
665:
638:
578:
546:
51:
865:
789:
774:
141:
941:
939:
880:
242:
221:
24:
992:
975:
960:
258:
887:
806:
755:
661:
634:
631:
574:
542:
592:
891:
861:
785:
354:
330:
773:
text on Knowledge. The text doesn't match the content of the source. It fails
248:
784:
rejection of the concept neo-Ottomanism, as provided by the 2 sources. --
983:
968:
948:
923:
907:
869:
814:
793:
763:
739:
718:
687:
669:
642:
609:
582:
564:
550:
535:
700:
In one lie it clearly states the others opinion that the Turkish are
271:
827:
632:
Vol. 5 No. 3 - Fall 2006 / The Euro-Atlantic: Fit For Global Action?
894:
for edits which are contentious and lack the necessary consensus
441:
420:
184:
15:
391:
587:
There is a policy of verifiability and request which says
654:
The Nation in the Global Era: Conflict and Transformation
895:
803:
751:
160:
954:
Are there sources which call Neo-Ottomanism Islamist?
453:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
974:Changing it since there have not been objections.
798:Did you notice that the title of the source is "
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1044:Mid-importance International relations articles
589:exceptional claims require exceptional sources
467:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
174:
8:
1049:WikiProject International relations articles
470:Template:WikiProject International relations
1024:Unknown-importance Ottoman Empire articles
415:
325:
216:
523:Turks and areas controlled by non-Turks.
1039:C-Class International relations articles
417:
327:
218:
188:
831:
376:Knowledge:WikiProject Former countries
1034:WikiProject Former countries articles
379:Template:WikiProject Former countries
7:
447:This article is within the scope of
360:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
1029:WikiProject Ottoman Empire articles
826:What IGI Global is you can read on
450:WikiProject International relations
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
754:that is promoting Neo-Ottomanism.
14:
879:
473:International relations articles
440:
419:
353:
329:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1019:C-Class Ottoman Empire articles
1014:C-Class former country articles
1004:High-importance Turkey articles
821:Don't judge a book by its cover
487:This article has been rated as
308:This article has been rated as
1:
984:06:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
969:15:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
870:00:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
719:01:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
688:17:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
670:16:38, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
643:16:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
610:16:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
583:15:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
565:15:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
551:14:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
536:12:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
461:and see a list of open tasks.
400:This article is supported by
282:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1009:All WikiProject Turkey pages
815:04:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
794:07:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
764:03:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
724:Maybe because they are?...
363:WikiProject Former countries
288:Knowledge:WikiProject Turkey
291:Template:WikiProject Turkey
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1065:
750:I have reverted this edit
740:20:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
493:project's importance scale
403:WikiProject Ottoman Empire
314:project's importance scale
949:18:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
652:R. Harris, Jerry Harris,
514:The first sentence says:
486:
435:
399:
348:
307:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
924:13:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
908:12:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
628:Turkish Policy Quarterly
999:C-Class Turkey articles
890:, I just had to revert
464:International relations
455:International relations
427:International relations
382:former country articles
396:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
395:
100:Neutral point of view
746:Whitewashing attempt
105:No original research
397:
267:WikiProject Turkey
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
730:comment added by
709:comment added by
680:Antidiskriminator
602:Antidiskriminator
557:Antidiskriminator
528:Antidiskriminator
510:Turkish → Ottoman
507:
506:
503:
502:
499:
498:
414:
413:
410:
409:
324:
323:
320:
319:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1056:
922:
906:
883:
742:
721:
475:
474:
471:
468:
465:
444:
437:
436:
431:
423:
416:
384:
383:
380:
377:
374:
373:Former countries
368:join the project
357:
350:
349:
344:
337:Former countries
333:
326:
296:
295:
292:
289:
286:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1064:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1054:
1053:
989:
988:
956:
932:
914:
898:
748:
725:
704:
698:
656:, BRILL, 2009,
512:
472:
469:
466:
463:
462:
429:
381:
378:
375:
372:
371:
339:
310:High-importance
294:Turkey articles
293:
290:
287:
284:
283:
257:
252:
250:
231:High‑importance
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1062:
1060:
1052:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1001:
991:
990:
987:
986:
955:
952:
931:
930:Biased article
928:
927:
926:
918:SilentResident
902:SilentResident
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
824:
781:
778:
747:
744:
697:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
646:
645:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
593:founded by NGO
511:
508:
505:
504:
501:
500:
497:
496:
489:Mid-importance
485:
479:
478:
476:
459:the discussion
445:
433:
432:
430:Mid‑importance
424:
412:
411:
408:
407:
398:
388:
387:
385:
358:
346:
345:
342:Ottoman Empire
334:
322:
321:
318:
317:
306:
300:
299:
297:
280:the discussion
276:related topics
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
25:Neo-Ottomanism
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1061:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
996:
994:
985:
981:
977:
973:
972:
971:
970:
966:
962:
953:
951:
950:
947:
946:
945:
940:
938:
936:
929:
925:
921:
919:
912:
911:
910:
909:
905:
903:
896:
893:
889:
886:
882:
871:
867:
863:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
833:
829:
828:their website
825:
822:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
801:
797:
796:
795:
791:
787:
782:
779:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
765:
761:
757:
752:
745:
743:
741:
737:
733:
732:83.86.142.220
729:
722:
720:
716:
712:
708:
703:
695:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
648:
647:
644:
640:
636:
633:
629:
625:
622:Murat Somer,
621:
620:
611:
607:
603:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
567:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
539:
538:
537:
533:
529:
524:
520:
519:
515:
509:
494:
490:
484:
481:
480:
477:
460:
456:
452:
451:
446:
443:
439:
438:
434:
428:
425:
422:
418:
405:
404:
394:
390:
389:
386:
369:
365:
364:
359:
356:
352:
351:
347:
343:
338:
335:
332:
328:
315:
311:
305:
302:
301:
298:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
259:Turkey portal
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
957:
943:
942:
933:
917:
901:
884:
878:
799:
749:
726:— Preceding
723:
711:99.115.20.86
705:— Preceding
701:
699:
675:
653:
649:
627:
596:
525:
521:
517:
516:
513:
488:
448:
401:
361:
309:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
771:WP:ORIGINAL
571:this source
569:Can we use
148:free images
31:not a forum
993:Categories
944:BerkBerk68
702:aggressive
591:. Journal
775:WP:VERIFY
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
976:Uness232
961:Uness232
885:Comment:
800:Imperial
728:unsigned
707:unsigned
600:claim?--
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
888:Khirurg
847:policy.
807:Khirurg
756:Khirurg
662:Takabeg
658:p. 394.
635:Takabeg
575:Takabeg
543:Takabeg
491:on the
312:on the
199:C-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
892:Randam
862:Randam
786:Randam
595:which
285:Turkey
272:Turkey
228:Turkey
205:scale.
126:Google
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
980:talk
965:talk
866:talk
811:talk
790:talk
760:talk
736:talk
715:talk
696:Bias
684:talk
666:talk
639:talk
606:talk
579:talk
561:talk
547:talk
532:talk
304:High
274:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
483:Mid
176:TWL
995::
982:)
967:)
916:âť–
900:âť–
868:)
830::
813:)
792:)
762:)
738:)
717:)
686:)
668:)
660:.
641:)
630:,
626:,
608:)
581:)
573:?
563:)
549:)
534:)
340::
156:)
54:;
978:(
963:(
920:âť–
904:âť–
864:(
809:(
788:(
758:(
734:(
713:(
682:(
664:(
637:(
604:(
577:(
559:(
545:(
530:(
495:.
406:.
370:.
316:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
