632:
sad artifact of the power of the internet. And I don't think I could find any reliable sources to suit your criteria. Very few "reliable sources" bother to go into this sort of topic in depth. Michael Heiser is one of the few academically credited people to bother to debunk
Sitchin, for instance. Most of the citations to fringe cites are merely to show that they are there, and that they do say what they say. They're not meant as valid sources of information.
690:
and the one most people will be looking for. Lieder herself initially called it Nibiru, as well as Planet X, though I believe Planet X was first, and the Nibiru connection was made later. I'm a bit confused as to your citing the other guy; he actually told me the problems had been resolved and that I should renominate the page. Still, I don't think I can find enough third party sources to satisfy your criteria, so I'd be happy to let it go.
337:
545:
508:
397:
302:
227:
207:
187:
143:
123:
599:
569:
479:
447:
426:
365:
273:
663:? I just do not see how this article as it stands can ever become a good article. If few reliable sources have commented on it then it is not notable enough for inclusion in Knowledge. Th previous reviweer laid out in detail the problems so I won't repeat them. My instincsts are to fail this nomination, but I am going to ask for other opinions.
689:
2000+ people are logging onto this page every day. It's notable because there is enough disinformation out there for millions to actually believe it, and to be frightened of it. Roland
Emmerich is making a movie about it for God's sake. As to why it's called Nibiru, that is its most common name now,
631:
I'm not sure what you mean by "in context". These are just the ramblings of a lonely, slightly eccentric middle-aged woman; they're not really in any context. Just because this idea has grown out of all proportion to its origins doesn't mean it is linked to any grand cultural patterns. It's just a
375:
is not RS; Thwe refernces to the zetatalk site would be better dealt with by a simple summary of her beliefs and a reference to the site; ref #6 is not RS; ref #14 is a forum not RS; refs 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 are not RS; likewise 29, 37, 39, 42; I am not sure about 33
379:. I rather agree with the comments in the earlier review regarding teh whole NPOV thing. They apply here in that alrge sections of the artciel are sourceed to clearly non RS websites.
722:
OK, We are making no progress here so I will not list this at the present time. If you do not agree with tis decision I recommend that you take this to a community reassessment at
659:
I agree that the theory is just the ramblings of an eccentric. I note that she appears to describe the object as Planet X, who decided it was to be called the
73:
69:
54:
697:
639:
46:
606:
I recommend a through rewrite to put this theory in conetxt, much as suggested in teh first GAn review. On hold for seven days.
537:
389:
294:
699:
641:
323:
731:
668:
611:
244:
99:
62:
17:
692:
634:
344:
This is the difficult bit when writing about fringe theories. I fixed one dead link but ref #19
218:
The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
280:
I did make a couple of copy-edits. I am concerned that a large section of the first section,
727:
664:
607:
527:
240:
134:
The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see
Knowledge:Neutral point of view.
95:
39:
23:
465:
91:
377:
723:
561:
284:, of the article is devoted to an in depth account of various statments on her site.
576:
I don't find the image useful, why is it there? this mythical planet doesn't exist.
357:
198:
The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
735:
705:
672:
647:
615:
345:
248:
103:
114:
The article completely lacks reliable sources – see
Knowledge:Verifiability.
373:
154:
There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including
239:
Ok as far as quick fail criteria are concerned, on to main review.
372:
Ref #1 although debunking Lieder's theories is not RS; ref #2
81:
50:
94:, following its nomination for Good Article status.
8:
536:(images are tagged and non-free images have
90:I shall be reviewing this page against the
7:
598:
568:
531:, where possible and appropriate.
478:
446:
425:
364:
272:
31:
597:
567:
543:
506:
477:
474:Fair representation without bias
445:
424:
395:
363:
335:
300:
271:
225:
205:
185:
141:
121:
109:Quick fail criteria assessment
1:
544:
507:
396:
336:
301:
254:Checking against GA criteria
226:
206:
186:
142:
122:
736:01:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
706:15:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
673:12:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
648:04:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
616:20:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
249:19:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
104:19:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
758:
24:Talk:Nibiru collision/GA2
261:reasonably well written
560:(appropriate use with
486:Not convinced of this.
525:It is illustrated by
466:neutral point of view
433:unresolved at present
92:Good Article criteria
18:Talk:Nibiru cataclysm
170:or large numbers of
538:fair use rationales
178:, or similar tags.
414:broad in its scope
319:factually accurate
562:suitable captions
503:No edit wars etc.
22:(Redirected from
749:
702:
695:
661:Nibiru collision
644:
637:
601:
600:
571:
570:
547:
546:
510:
509:
481:
480:
449:
448:
428:
427:
399:
398:
367:
366:
358:reliable sources
339:
338:
304:
303:
275:
274:
229:
228:
209:
208:
189:
188:
145:
144:
125:
124:
86:
77:
58:
27:
757:
756:
752:
751:
750:
748:
747:
746:
700:
693:
642:
635:
463:It follows the
421:(major aspects)
256:
67:
44:
38:
36:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
755:
753:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
622:
620:
619:
618:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
579:
578:
577:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
356:(citations to
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
255:
252:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
152:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
87:
35:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
754:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
707:
704:
703:
698:
696:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
646:
645:
640:
638:
623:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
604:
603:
602:
595:
592:
591:
589:
586:
580:
575:
574:
573:
572:
565:
563:
557:
551:
550:
549:
548:
541:
539:
533:
532:
530:
529:
524:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
504:
501:
500:
498:
494:
485:
484:
483:
482:
475:
472:
471:
469:
467:
462:
453:
452:
451:
450:
443:
439:
432:
431:
430:
429:
422:
418:
417:
415:
411:
403:
402:
401:
400:
393:
391:
385:
378:
374:
371:
370:
369:
368:
361:
359:
353:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
333:
329:
328:
326:
325:
320:
316:
308:
307:
306:
305:
298:
296:
290:
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
269:
265:
264:
262:
258:
257:
253:
251:
250:
246:
242:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
217:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
197:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
133:
120:
119:
118:
117:
116:
115:
113:
112:
111:
110:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
88:
85:
84:
80:
75:
71:
66:
65:
61:
56:
52:
48:
43:
42:
33:
25:
19:
691:
660:
633:
630:
593:
587:
559:
535:
526:
502:
496:
473:
464:
441:
420:
413:
387:
355:
332:(references)
331:
322:
318:
292:
281:
267:
260:
238:
175:
171:
168:unreferenced
167:
163:
159:
155:
108:
107:
89:
82:
78:
64:Article talk
63:
59:
40:
37:
728:Jezhotwells
665:Jezhotwells
608:Jezhotwells
241:Jezhotwells
96:Jezhotwells
51:visual edit
454:unresolved
324:verifiable
594:Pass/Fail
442:(focused)
176:clarifyme
34:GA Review
347:is dead.
694:Serendi
636:Serendi
588:Overall
282:Origins
268:(prose)
156:cleanup
74:history
55:history
41:Article
724:WP:GAR
528:images
497:stable
495:It is
468:policy
412:It is
317:It is
259:It is
160:wikify
83:Watch
16:<
732:talk
669:talk
612:talk
321:and
245:talk
172:fact
164:NPOV
100:talk
70:edit
47:edit
701:ous
643:ous
295:MoS
734:)
726:.
671:)
614:)
596::
590::
566::
558:b
542::
534:a
505::
499:.
476::
470:.
444::
440:b
423::
419:a
416:.
394::
390:OR
386:c
362::
354:b
334::
330:a
327:.
299::
291:b
270::
266:a
263:.
247:)
174:,
166:,
162:,
158:,
102:)
72:|
53:|
49:|
730:(
667:(
610:(
564:)
540:)
392:)
388:(
360:)
297:)
293:(
243:(
98:(
79:·
76:)
68:(
60:·
57:)
45:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.