Knowledge

Talk:Nibiru cataclysm/GA3

Source ๐Ÿ“

877: 857: 841: 813: 788: 765: 753: 732: 716: 698: 667: 631: 49: 497: 420: 268: 235: 437:- I'm having trouble verifying the statement: "Believers in Planet X/Nibiru have often confused it with Nemesis,". Ref 23 leads me , I'm not sure what the reference is: if it is one of those dated answered questions, that aught to be specifically stated, e.g. "Answered Tuesday, November 2, 2010" - I know it is not this one. Could it be ref 25? 707:
as that appears to the the "mouthpiece" of Nancy Lieder and it is being used as a source for Nancy Lieder's statements. Another one is Mike brown's Planets, but his Biography has him as the Richard and Barbara Rosenberg Professor of Planetary Astronomy at the California Institute of Technology, since
345:
Well refs 16, 19 and 21 appear to provide verification of what is claimed, but I'm having trouble confirming: "However, nearly a century of searching failed to turn up any evidence for such an object (Pluto was initially believed to be Planet X, but was later determined to be too small).".
54: 281:) 10:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC) - I also checked out ref 17. Its (I checked Amazon.com) a book: its full title seems to be a bit longer than given in the article, i.e. 87: 77: 661: 133: 129: 59: 114: 911: 566: 453: 369: 308: 605: 252:) is only partially cited. You've got the Journal's name, the article's title and the original pub. date; but not the Authors name. 106: 835: 82: 726: 187:
By now I've read the article through once and it appears to be at or about GA-level, but I've not checked all the citations.
194:
until last. I may fix "minor" problems as I go, but if I don't I will list them here. This may take another day or so.
617:
An informative, well referenced article on this topic of "forthcoming doom, or not, depending on your point of view".
641: 545:
At this point, there are a few minor fixes needed on a few of the citations so I'm putting the review On Hold.
913: 684: 568: 455: 371: 310: 807: 708:
1994 and his site is used as a source of information on planets. "Ask an Astrobiologist" is a NASA site.
122: 17: 906: 561: 448: 364: 303: 889:
I'm awarding this article GA status. Congratulations on bringing the article up to GA standard.
894: 589: 550: 507: 430: 392: 351: 290: 278: 257: 245: 224: 199: 172: 157: 827: 692: 649: 99: 609: 23: 703:
A few of the sources are blogs and/or personal websites. I'm accepting "Zeta Talk" as a
778: 645: 529: 191: 851: 657: 653: 190:
I'm now going to work my way through the article section by section, but leaving the
890: 704: 585: 546: 503: 426: 388: 347: 286: 274: 253: 241: 220: 195: 168: 153: 919: 898: 593: 574: 554: 511: 461: 434: 396: 377: 355: 316: 294: 261: 228: 203: 176: 161: 285:, and it would be helpful if the ISBN could be given in the citation. 580:
Thanks. Yes, I've backtracked a bit so there are some new ones in
248:) 10:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC) - I'm sorry to backtrack. Ref 9 ( 850:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
387:
Sorry for the delay, I'll try and get this review finished.
514:- Ref 45, Thomas O'Toole, seems to have a broken web link. 834:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
283:
The End of Days: Armageddon and Prophecies of the Return
141: 110: 713:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 559:ref subbed. Any other citation fixes needed? 8: 37: 68: 40: 7: 785:Fair representation without bias: 31: 875: 855: 839: 811: 786: 763: 751: 730: 714: 696: 665: 629: 495: 418: 266: 233: 219:This section looks OK so far. 1: 539:These three sections look OK. 876: 856: 840: 812: 787: 764: 752: 731: 715: 697: 666: 630: 936: 920:12:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 899:10:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 615: 594:16:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 575:16:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 555:15:40, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 512:10:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 462:13:28, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 435:13:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 397:12:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 317:17:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 295:13:53, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 262:13:53, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 831:to illustrate the topic? 378:15:28, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 356:21:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 229:20:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 204:20:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 177:07:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 162:07:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 24:Talk:Nibiru collision/GA3 623:reasonably well written 478:This section looks OK. 745:broad in its coverage 693:References to sources 18:Talk:Nibiru cataclysm 727:No original research 469:Scientific criticism 836:fair use rationales 486:Conspiracy theories 750:A. Major aspects: 680:factually accurate 628:A. Prose quality: 526:Cultural influence 852:suitable captions 96: 95: 22:(Redirected from 927: 916: 909: 879: 878: 859: 858: 843: 842: 815: 814: 790: 789: 767: 766: 755: 754: 734: 733: 718: 717: 700: 699: 669: 668: 633: 632: 571: 564: 502: 499: 498: 458: 451: 425: 422: 421: 374: 367: 313: 306: 273: 270: 269: 240: 237: 236: 183:Initial comments 146: 137: 118: 50:Copyvio detector 38: 27: 935: 934: 930: 929: 928: 926: 925: 924: 914: 907: 644:compliance for 602: 600:Overall summary 569: 562: 522:Public reaction 500: 496: 456: 449: 423: 419: 372: 365: 311: 304: 271: 267: 238: 234: 185: 167:I will review. 127: 104: 98: 92: 64: 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 933: 931: 923: 922: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 874:Pass or Fail: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 848: 847: 846: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 760: 759: 758: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 723: 722: 721: 711: 710: 709: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 654:words to watch 638: 637: 636: 601: 598: 597: 596: 543: 542: 541: 540: 534: 533: 518: 517: 516: 515: 490: 489: 482: 481: 480: 479: 473: 472: 465: 464: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 411: 410: 409: 408: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 359: 358: 338: 337: 336: 335: 322: 321: 320: 319: 298: 297: 264: 231: 214: 213: 184: 181: 180: 179: 147: 94: 93: 91: 90: 85: 80: 74: 71: 70: 66: 65: 63: 62: 60:External links 57: 52: 46: 43: 42: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 932: 921: 918: 917: 912: 910: 903: 902: 901: 900: 896: 892: 881: 880: 873: 872: 870: 867: 861: 860: 853: 849: 845: 844: 837: 833: 832: 830: 829: 823: 817: 816: 809: 805: 804: 802: 798: 792: 791: 784: 783: 781: 780: 775: 769: 768: 761: 757: 756: 749: 748: 746: 742: 736: 735: 728: 724: 720: 719: 712: 706: 702: 701: 694: 690: 689: 687: 686: 681: 677: 671: 670: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634: 627: 626: 624: 620: 619: 618: 614: 613: 611: 608:review โ€“ see 607: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 578: 577: 576: 573: 572: 567: 565: 557: 556: 552: 548: 538: 537: 536: 535: 531: 527: 523: 520: 519: 513: 509: 505: 494: 493: 492: 491: 487: 484: 483: 477: 476: 475: 474: 470: 467: 466: 463: 460: 459: 454: 452: 445: 444: 436: 432: 428: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 406: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 394: 390: 379: 376: 375: 370: 368: 361: 360: 357: 353: 349: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 333: 330: 329: 327: 324: 323: 318: 315: 314: 309: 307: 300: 299: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 265: 263: 259: 255: 251: 250:Fortean Times 247: 243: 232: 230: 226: 222: 218: 217: 216: 215: 211: 208: 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 188: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 165: 164: 163: 159: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 125: 121: 116: 112: 108: 103: 102: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 75: 73: 72: 67: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 47: 45: 44: 39: 33: 25: 19: 905: 888: 868: 825: 800: 777: 762:B. Focused: 744: 683: 679: 622: 616: 612:for criteria 604: 603: 581: 560: 558: 544: 525: 521: 485: 468: 447: 446:Ref subbed. 404: 386: 363: 362:ref subbed. 331: 325: 302: 301:Refs fixed. 282: 249: 209: 189: 186: 150: 149: 142: 138: 124:Article talk 123: 119: 100: 97: 88:Instructions 326:Other names 111:visual edit 685:verifiable 55:Authorship 41:GA toolbox 808:edit wars 151:Reviewer: 78:Templates 69:Reviewing 34:GA Review 904:Thanks! 826:contain 824:Does it 610:WP:WIAGA 332:Planet X 83:Criteria 908:Serendi 891:Pyrotec 869:Overall 810:, etc: 779:neutral 658:fiction 586:Pyrotec 582:Origins 563:Serendi 547:Pyrotec 530:WP:Lead 504:Pyrotec 450:Serendi 427:Pyrotec 405:Nemesis 389:Pyrotec 366:Serendi 348:Pyrotec 305:Serendi 287:Pyrotec 275:Pyrotec 254:Pyrotec 242:Pyrotec 221:Pyrotec 210:Origins 196:Pyrotec 192:WP:Lead 169:Pyrotec 154:Pyrotec 134:history 115:history 101:Article 828:images 801:stable 799:Is it 776:Is it 743:Is it 678:Is it 660:, and 650:layout 621:Is it 528:& 705:WP:RS 662:lists 143:Watch 16:< 895:talk 682:and 646:lead 590:talk 551:talk 508:talk 431:talk 393:talk 352:talk 291:talk 279:talk 258:talk 246:talk 225:talk 200:talk 173:talk 158:talk 130:edit 107:edit 915:ous 806:No 725:C. 691:A. 642:MoS 640:B. 570:ous 457:ous 373:ous 312:ous 897:) 871:: 854:: 838:: 803:? 782:? 747:? 729:: 695:: 688:? 664:: 656:, 652:, 648:, 625:? 606:GA 592:) 584:. 553:) 524:, 510:) 433:) 395:) 354:) 328:- 293:) 260:) 227:) 202:) 175:) 160:) 132:| 113:| 109:| 893:( 588:( 549:( 532:- 506:( 501:Y 488:- 471:- 429:( 424:Y 407:- 391:( 350:( 334:- 289:( 277:( 272:Y 256:( 244:( 239:Y 223:( 212:- 198:( 171:( 156:( 139:ยท 136:) 128:( 120:ยท 117:) 105:( 26:)

Index

Talk:Nibiru cataclysm
Talk:Nibiru collision/GA3
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Pyrotec
talk
07:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Pyrotec
talk
07:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
WP:Lead
Pyrotec
talk
20:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Pyrotec
talk
20:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Pyrotec

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘