277:, ie a not well known US city outside the US. The wealth of the respective cities is completely irrelevant (though here the California city does have an impressive track record, making me wonder why I had never heard of it). Whereas the political reality is very important. Knowledge is already overbearingly US centered and I believe in countering that systemic bias in order to create both a more NPOV encyclopedia and a more NPOV disambiguation page, justifying my edit on the immensely greater importance of Costa Rica as a political city. The laws and authority that keeps a nation of several million people together and gives those people status in the world (the legitimate right to travel using Costa Rican passports etc) all comes from San Jose. There is nothing remotely comparable in San Jose, California, which doesnt even rule the state of California let alone legitimise and guarantee the sovereignty and freedom of a people in the world. Besides, hits on a search engine counts as original research and is certainly not sourced.
1270:(the relevant Manual of Style section) state that you should "provide redirects from alternative forms that use or exclude diacritics". So no, I do not agree you on this. Regardless of whether you are an English speaker in the U.S. or another country, it is inconvenient to enter the "é" with the accent; and most users may not immediately know the difference because of search engines and optical character recognition errors, or because the accent may be too small to be noticeable when displayed on their device. Maybe it is easy for you to enter the "é" with the accent or notice it on your screen, but for an elderly or handicapped person in Australia, trying to rely on
506:
because eBay and Adobe (to name two) are headquartered there. San Jose, California is regularly visited by the
President of the United States with enough frequency that the Secret Service maintains an office there; the last time a U.S. President visited San Jose, Costa Rica was President Clinton back in 1997. Also, both the city of San Jose, California and the surrounding metro area are home to larger, better educated, and far wealthier populations than their counterparts in Costa Rica. When I have the time this summer I plan to formally initiate the proposed move process.--
319:
disambiguation page, to fit the different needs of different readers. Both places are clearly there so nobody should actually have any problems. To argue that the
California place is more important to the world economy is a controversial statement that may not be true, but whether it is or not this isnt the place to discuss that especially as there is no policy of making richer places more important (for what I hope are obvious reasons). In the past we were all accustomed to nationally based encyclopedias but this is an international; not an American encyclopedia.
308:. In percentage terms San Jose, CA is closer in population to London than it is to Burnley. San Jose has 13 times the population of Burnley, and more than twice the population of Manchester. The main reason that San Jose isn't more known around the world is that it gets lumped in with Sunnyvale, and Santa Clara as part of Silicon Valley, or with those areas plus San Francisco and Oakland, and a few other places as the San Francisco Bay Area (even though San Jose has more people than the city of San Francisco).
1266:, the guideline regarding the use of modified letters such as accents or other diacritics in article titles, states that "Search engines are problematic unless their verdict is overwhelming; modified letters have the additional difficulties that some search engines will not distinguish between the original and modified forms, and others fail to recognize the modified letter because of optical character recognition errors". And that is probably also why both WP:DIACRITICS and
22:
71:
53:
1082:
344:
capital. Knowledge is not a job opportunity search engine or a collection of curious nicknames. Why not simply list the two cities along with the others? Myself, I'd think unqualified "San José" would never usually refer to San José, California, unless you're
American and/or looking for a job in Silicon Valley. --
1232:
One additional factor I failed to mention in the proposal is that in
English language keyboards/devices, “e” is generally the natural and convenient character to immediately show up and it takes more effort and intentionality beyond that to get to “é” combined with English being the de facto official
475:
It's much larger and far more important and notable than the other San Jose. Usually, when people accidentally book the wrong reservation and end up in San Jose, Costa Rica, they're actually trying to get to San Jose, California, not the other way around. People make history in San Jose, California
329:
We can't even argue which is more important from a global/economic scale can we? Costa Rica as a whole doesn't even have a third of the GDP of San Jose of
Silicon Valley. Not to mention exports... I think alot of people on the internet would look for San Jose because of it's job opportunites, or just
287:
When I type San Jose, I expect to find the
Silicon Valley city. I didn't even know of a San Jose outside of the States until I the first time I visited this page on Knowledge. San Jose is very large, old and more important to the world economy. Besides California comes before Costa Rica in ABC order,
1308:
generally says that "terms that differ only in capitalization, punctuation and diacritic marks ... should almost always share a disambiguation page". There are only a handful of entries listed without the accent, plus many subjects related to the
California city can be spelled either way, so it does
1256:
Since this is the
English Knowledge, I would assume that most readers and editors would still be using an English language keyboards/device, not a Spanish one, regardless if they are in the U.S. or in other countries. And thus a typical English-speaking reader or editor in Australia, Canada, the UK,
397:
And just to clear up an error on the Wiki page on San José, California - the "angicized" version of "San José" is Saint Joseph; the accent over the "e" was dropped by the US postal
Service when it "simplified" and standardized their "official" spelling of the names of cities and towns all across the
168:
You cant compare some obscure US city with a capital city of a sovereign nation. To reinforce the argument with stats from a deeply US centered, California based company doesnt really stand up. The fact that it gives as many hits as Moscow merely proves my point. Are we writing an encyclopedia or a
299:
I'm not necessarily opposed to the Cost Rican city being listed first (even though the CA city is larger and effects the world more) as it is a capital city, but its just silly to compare San Jose, CA with
Burnley. To consider it as famous or important as Burnley would seem to indicate an anti-US
1375:
You mention the policy stating that "terms that differ only in capitalization, punctuation and diacritic marks ... should almost always share a disambiguation page" – Do you know why the 0.1%, 0.5%, 2% break the “ALMOST ALWAYS” rule in this case? (Compared to the default mainstream 98-99.9% that
393:
So what if San José, Costa Rica is the capitol of an obscure Third-World country? There are some real hell-holes around the world that are national capitols. San José, California is the third-largest city in the state that has the 11th-largest economy in the world and it was the state capitol of
343:
May I? I'm an Argentinian and I've never been to either Costa Rica or the United States. I consider myself fairly well educated and informed (geopolitically). If someone asked me up front to name an important city called San José, I would immediately say "San José de Costa Rica". It's a national
505:
No, it suggests that many other countries have incompetent travel agents. San Jose, Costa Rica is an obscure backwater that rarely makes international headlines. (Actually, one could say the same thing about Costa Rica in general.) San Jose, California is frequently in international headlines
318:
California does not come before Costa Rica as it is not a sovereign country. Unitede States comes after Costa Rica. I am certain that San Jose is newer than San José. When I type San Jose I expect to find the capital city not some Silicon Valley place I had never heard of. That is why we have a
441:
Yes, the article named "San Jose" or "San José" should redirect to a disambiguation, because two major cities in the world share this name, and it's just a fair result. Both cities have the same size and similar achievements (one is an important industrial city, the other one is a capital of a
1209:
discussion above. There is no clear and consistent distinction between the having the accent and not having it. And the city of San Jose, CA does not help matters when it officially accepts both depending on whether it is upper- or lowercase, among others, as stated in the last paragraph of
1457:, whatever the Spanish Knowledge is doing should be irrelevant to what is happening here on the English Knowledge, even if they are doing the same thing, primarily because the common usage of each respective language may be different. They are using parenthetical disambiguation titles like
829:
It's a bad idea, if at all avoidable, to have different articles whose titles differ only by a diacritic, especially one so haphazardly used or omitted. It's not clear from the proposal what Red Slash wants the title of the article on the California city to be, but surely having
363:
Old Guard, you are assuming that people have heard of San Jose in California whereas I would argue it is an obscure place for most non/Americans. All those arguing in its favour are Americans and you none of you seem to have realised that most Americans have never heard of it.
653:– while it's common to drop the accent from the name of the California San José, it's certainly not rare to keep it, as on the city's home page. A disambig page seems like the right thing here. And it already has the appropriate redirects from non-accented variants.
750:
should lead to the same place as it's clear that there is no clear and consistent distinction made between them by English speakers. The only settlement that has a claim to primary topic status is the Californian one, so it or the dab page needs to be at this title.
194:, which has 10 times the population). In contrast, the GDP of all of Costa Rica is about $ 18 billion, which means the portion of the Californian city's economy devoted to exports is larger than the entire economy of the nation the Costa Rican city is the capital of.
687:- as I have stated above, the better arrangement is to have the California city of San Jose under this article title because it is by far the most commonly referred-to "San Jose" in the English language and is far more important than the one in Costa Rica. --
1241:
if it hasn’t been mentioned at all in previous discussions, and if there are significant differences between the digital process of mainstream English language keyboarding vs mainstream Spanish language keyboarding, it offers a compelling new argument.
1261:
besides the U.S. would still be likely hitting the "e" (without the accent) key even if they are searching for any topic regarding San Jose, Costa Rica or any other topic that has the "é" (with the accent) because of the inconvenience. Furthermore,
272:
Your last comment is not only completely unprovable but I would argue it is wrong. I for one had never heard of San Jose in California till i came to this page so I dispute that it is anything like as famous as Manchester. More like as famous as
1233:
language of San Jose, CA and its most closely-related topics. With the Costa Rican city, I’m presuming that the topic and its surrounding infrastructure broadly has Spanish as its dominant de facto language. Any thoughts regarding that idea?
914:
Major difference is that most users of an English language encyclopedia can type capitals from their keyboard easily, but not diacriticals - so people shouldn't have to get the diacriticals right to get simply to the page they need.
414:
OK, for over a year there were two SJs listed up top. I have reverted SquawkBox's edit, which threw SJ California into the main list (linking mostly to stubs). I'm not going to argue SJ Cal belongs ahead of a national capital,
807:
pointing to different places, despite how logically that would fix a whole boatload of our problems. So we're going to be stuck with this disambiguation for now. Not probably the worst thing in the history of the world.
179:
There are many ways to measure importance. If we're just looking politically, than I agree, the Capital of Costa Rica is more important than the County Seat of Santa Clara County. However, that not the only
1034:
Indeed, this reliance on capitalization to distinguish uses has puzzled me for a long time. It is something that is easily confused and really should be treated as exceptional rather recommended as a norm.
1282:
if the software cannot easily make the distinguish because they are only programmed to understand the common English alphabet without any diacritic marks. So per those two guidelines I just mentioned,
1426:. Not that it makes much of a difference with regards to English. #2, are these numbers based on some evidence or are you just pulling things out of thin air because you think it helps your case?
261:). The truth of the matter is that when a user of our site enters the string "San Jose" or "San José" into our search box, most of the time, they're not looking for the capital of Costa Rica.
183:
The population of the California city is roughly 50% larger than the Costa Rican city. However, depending on how you define the term, their metropolitan areas have about the same population.
190:
from the 2000 US Census shows that the city in California is the United States' second-largest exporting city with $ 26.8 billion in manufacturing exports (less than 4% behind the #1 city,
846:?), but that goes against the general agreement on US cities, unless the Costa Rica city is to be promoted based on its national-capital status in spite of its lower general prominence. --
446:
San José – or San Jose – is the Spanish for Saint Joseph. According to the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency's GEOnet Names Server, it is the most common place name in the world
169:
googlepedia? More importantly are we writing the US encyclopedia of world affairs or an international encyclopedia? The answer to the latter is that we are not a US centered encyclopedia.
670:
per Dicklyon; it's not safe to assume that all English speakers (or even most of them) are aware of the correct usage/non-usage of an accent in the California city's name. --
1093:
900:. With diacritics, we're always supposed to have a redirect from the plain variety; it's hard to do that if you're going to try to use the plain one for a different topic.
1143:
being "San Jose" without the acute accent on the "e", and official name being "San José" with the acute accent on the "e", there have been various move proposals on it (see
1258:
374:
As a European I had not even heard about a city called San Jose in California. It is pretty obvious that most people would expect to find the capital of Costa Rica. --
636:
if it isn't displaced to point to particular city. Many of the entries on the page do not contain accents, so the simpler form should be used to title the page. --
795:, because it would follow U.S. conventions with City, State. And there's no way it's beating out the capital of Costa Rica and a slew of other smaller cities for
590:. Note the accent. In the English-speaking world, I don't believe anybody ever uses "San José" to refer to the major U.S. metropolis. I would in fact support
1519:). So unless there are any other editors supporting the OP regarding these San José pages, I would consider this discussion closed, keeping the status quo.
249:; the Californian city has twice the population and was incorporated as a city three years earlier, but the British city has a longer overall history and
953:
I can't think of any case in which we would use a dash to distinguish an article from a different one that uses a hyphen or a different type of dash.
1543:
97:
1176:
868:
to the Costa Rica one. No no no no no, that won't do at all. The diacritic cannot be used distinctively. That would cause no end of confusion. --
1441:
Yeah, where are those figures coming from, not that any such figures will help change my mind? Generally speaking, I have been citing various
896:
It's like the difference between bad and worse. We usually try not to use capitalization that way, but some times editors insist, like with
93:
78:
58:
1465:
for cities instead of comma-separated disambiguation that we use here, and they apparently do not need to list both cities at the top of
1015:
1445:
where "occasional exceptions may apply" based on forming a consensus when applying them to each individual situation like this one, not
1275:
1172:
1152:
1144:
1075:
1021:
940:
883:
679:
637:
476:
every day (for example, more patents are filed from San Jose than anywhere else in the United States), not in San Jose, Costa Rica. --
1474:
939:
That doesn't explain all the other untypable characters we use to distinguish between two different articles (such as dashes) --
1470:
1449:
that are "standards all users should normally follow". I do not think an exception should apply in this particular case. As for
1168:
1148:
717:
582:– With the exception of a few minor villages and small cities scattered around Latin America, no page has any claim to be at
235:
turns up 1.6 million hits, about a 5.7:1 ratio for the California city. Just to keep consistent with my previous example,
1160:
1020:
True, how do we change that? Can we prevail upon accessibility concerns to get rid of capital letter disambiguation? --
33:
1067:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
537:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1407:
1247:
1126:
998:
use capitalization to distinguish article titles. Users who rely on screen readers can't hear any difference between
1121:
I propose that “San Jose” be redirected to the California city and “San José” be redirected to the Costa Rica city.
1164:
627:
202:
330:
for curiosity regarding the "Capital of Silicon Valley". How many people here are even looking for Costa Rica?--
1482:
1478:
1183:
distinction between having the acute accent and not having it. And thus we should keep the status quo and have
453:
83:
1516:
1469:
before any other listings like we have to do on our disambiguation page. But again, the Spanish Knowledge's
1156:
843:
587:
572:
21:
1403:
1243:
1180:
1122:
1025:
944:
887:
641:
350:
258:
300:(or anti San Jose) bias. San Jose, CA is the 10th largest city in the US. Burnley isn't even listed in
1462:
1458:
882:
If we use capitalization in such a manner, what's the difference in using diacritics in this manner? --
401:
289:
214:
39:
379:
1305:
1263:
1211:
1140:
839:
705:
692:
595:
511:
481:
229:
222:
1191:
and keep the latter as the disambig page (because there are more existing entries with the accent).
701:
If it's most commonly referred to as "San Jose", why would you want its article called "San José"??
420:
1107:
1029:
873:
851:
814:
756:
612:
449:
424:
491:
The fact that they end up in Costa Rica seems to suggest that that is the more notable San Jose.--
375:
1446:
1354:
Do you know how the Spanish language WP is disambiguated for the “San Jose/San José” search term?
979:
905:
773:
713:
658:
250:
136:
1011:
675:
1524:
1490:
1431:
1314:
1295:
1219:
1196:
1040:
788:
419:, but by any reasonable measure (population, economics) SJ California belongs in the top two.
345:
305:
301:
1442:
1089:
496:
398:
United States, the official spelling used by the city government is the correct "San José".
187:
1477:
guidelines should do what is in the best interest for Spanish language readers, while the
688:
507:
477:
442:
country). Besides, according to the same cite in the article "San Jose (disambiguation)":
236:
1512:
1267:
1097:
925:
869:
847:
809:
752:
607:
365:
331:
320:
278:
254:
170:
144:
1537:
1485:
guidelines here should do what is in the best interest for English language readers.
1271:
975:
954:
901:
769:
731:
709:
654:
551:
309:
262:
191:
156:
1520:
1486:
1427:
1397:
1310:
1291:
1236:
1215:
1192:
1036:
1007:
671:
1287:
1188:
1003:
999:
865:
835:
804:
796:
747:
583:
576:
561:
492:
394:
California when San José, Costa Rica was still a sleepy little unknown village.
1304:
And since we are dealing with a disambiguation page, the first bullet point in
1466:
1454:
1419:
1279:
246:
916:
838:
in Costa Rica is a non-starter. So that seems to leave moving this page to
140:
205:
being considered, so you dispute it's results. I would attempt to use the
1450:
1423:
1283:
1184:
897:
861:
831:
800:
792:
743:
591:
547:
218:
1515:
was placed on the OP on 10 June, based on issues unrelated to this one (
1081:
217:. So I attempted to locate a neutral source and found Netherlands based
197:
Common usage can in some way be measured by web hits. Unfortunatly, the
274:
1528:
1494:
1434:
1411:
1318:
1299:
1251:
1223:
1200:
1130:
1111:
1043:
983:
957:
948:
934:
909:
891:
877:
855:
819:
777:
760:
734:
696:
662:
645:
617:
555:
515:
500:
485:
457:
428:
404:
383:
368:
355:
334:
323:
312:
292:
281:
265:
173:
860:
Oh, now that I look closer, Red Slash does indeed seem to think that
730:; hatnotes will suffice to direct users to the appropriate article.
206:
198:
971:
967:
531:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
259:
San Jose-San Francico-Oakland Combined Metropolitan Statiscical Area
70:
52:
1061:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
152:
1418:
1, You can see for yourself how the Spanish Wiki disambiguates
245:
I would argue that the Californian city is about as obscure as
604:
expecting to get a target other than the capital of Costa Rica
15:
1088:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
791:, the city in California would never be listed at plain-Jane
626:
if the disambiguation page is to be moved, it should be move
288:
so it wouldn't have a POV if it were first, I would think. --
1080:
306:
http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_English_cities_by_population
302:
http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_cities_in_the_United_Kingdom
255:
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara Metropolitan Statistical Area
963:
600:
Very few English-language users type in the exact title
242:
on the same engine brings in not quite 1.5 million hits.
1179:
adding the accent). Therefore there is not a clear cut
632:
566:
88:
96:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
799:, and following your guys' logic, we can never have
1309:not make sense to split them and have redundancy.
86:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can
389:Being a sovereign country is not such a big deal
76:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
630:, though currently I think it should be called
228:there turns up almost 277 thousand hits, while
1205:This was basically also the consensus at the
974:. Other than those, I hope there are none.
8:
82:, an attempt to structure and organize all
19:
253:has a slightly larger population than the
47:
864:should point to the California city, and
471:San Jose, California should be moved here
92:attached to this talk page, or visit the
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
606:. So we should probably move it there.
49:
994:Although this is off-topic, we really
257:(although it is much smaller than the
7:
1471:es:Knowledge:Convenciones de títulos
598:, but that's beside the point here.
106:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation
1206:
1171:keeping it without the accent) and
1147:) and its related articles such as
186:Economically, there is no contest.
109:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
38:It is of interest to the following
1475:es:Knowledge:Ambigüedad en títulos
417:so I still have SJ CR listed first
14:
1544:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
1173:Berryessa/North San José station
410:Revision of 01:07, 31 March 2008
69:
51:
20:
1290:, or vice versa, not split up.
542:The result of the proposal was
1149:San Jose International Airport
1117:Proposing a split of redirects
215:suburb of the Californian city
203:suburb of the Californian city
1:
1139:. Due to the common name for
437:Redirecting to Disambiguation
313:22:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
501:14:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
486:02:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
1276:speech recognition software
458:20:54, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
1560:
1259:English-speaking countries
516:10:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
369:20:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
356:10:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
335:02:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
147:16:40, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
79:WikiProject Disambiguation
1529:02:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
1453:currently redirecting to
1212:San Jose, California#Name
1165:San Jose State University
1112:16:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
628:San Jose (disambiguation)
567:San José (disambiguation)
429:23:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
405:07:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
384:15:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
324:14:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
293:06:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
282:23:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
266:23:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
174:15:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
64:
46:
1495:20:34, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1483:Knowledge:Disambiguation
1479:Knowledge:Article titles
1463:es:San José (California)
1459:es:San José (Costa Rica)
1435:18:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1412:18:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1319:17:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1300:12:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1252:11:11, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1224:01:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1201:01:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
1187:continue to redirect to
1131:23:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
1092:. Please participate in
1076:Redirects for discussion
1064:Please do not modify it.
1044:13:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
962:I can think of a case:
556:19:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
534:Please do not modify it.
467:ur the cooliest og all'
207:world's #2 search engine
199:world's #1 search engine
1157:San Jose Public Library
1096:if you wish to do so.
1094:the redirect discussion
1030:03:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
1016:14:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
984:18:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
958:15:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
949:03:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
935:14:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
910:05:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
892:04:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
878:01:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
856:01:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
820:00:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
778:08:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
761:18:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
735:17:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
697:16:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
680:14:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
663:06:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
646:03:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
618:23:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
159:01:43, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
112:Disambiguation articles
1163:removing the accent),
1155:removing the accent),
1085:
1084:
834:be in California but
1443:Knowledge guidelines
1335:Two quick questions:
1141:San Jose, California
844:San José, California
840:San Jose, California
596:San Jose, California
588:San José, Costa Rica
573:San José, Costa Rica
1286:should redirect to
1280:accessibility issue
1278:, it may become an
1169:previous discussion
1153:previous discussion
1074:"San jo" listed at
720:) 17:08, 7 May 2013
232:San Jose California
225:San Jose Costa Rica
209:, but, alas, it is
30:disambiguation page
1447:Knowledge policies
1086:
251:Greater Manchester
34:content assessment
1404:Mrbeastmodeallday
1244:Mrbeastmodeallday
1123:Mrbeastmodeallday
722:
708:comment added by
164:Which comes first
128:
127:
124:
123:
120:
119:
1551:
1401:
1376:follow the rule)
1240:
1145:previous 2016 RM
1104:
1066:
932:
923:
812:
721:
702:
635:
610:
569:
536:
354:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
91:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1534:
1533:
1395:
1234:
1207:#Requested move
1181:WP:SMALLDETAILS
1119:
1098:
1079:
1071:
1062:
926:
917:
827:General comment
810:
768:per Thryduulf.
703:
631:
608:
594:redirecting to
565:
532:
526:
473:
465:
439:
412:
391:
348:
346:Pablo D. Flores
166:
137:Puerto San José
133:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
87:
12:
11:
5:
1557:
1555:
1547:
1546:
1536:
1535:
1532:
1531:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1438:
1437:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1272:screen readers
1268:MOS:DIACRITICS
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1161:see discussion
1118:
1115:
1078:
1072:
1070:
1069:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
912:
823:
822:
781:
780:
763:
737:
725:
724:
723:
682:
665:
648:
580:
579:
570:
540:
539:
527:
525:
524:Requested move
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
472:
469:
464:
461:
450:JorgeRodriguez
438:
435:
433:
411:
408:
390:
387:
373:
361:
360:
359:
358:
338:
337:
316:
315:
296:
295:
271:
269:
268:
243:
201:is based in a
195:
184:
181:
180:consideration.
165:
162:
161:
160:
135:Can I include
132:
129:
126:
125:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
103:Disambiguation
84:disambiguation
74:
62:
61:
59:Disambiguation
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1556:
1545:
1542:
1541:
1539:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1513:community ban
1510:
1509:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1399:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1307:
1306:WP:DABCOMBINE
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:WP:DIACRITICS
1260:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1238:
1231:
1230:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1116:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1103:
1102:
1095:
1091:
1083:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1065:
1059:
1058:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
960:
959:
956:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
938:
937:
936:
933:
931:
930:
924:
922:
921:
913:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
894:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
858:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
828:
825:
824:
821:
818:
817:
813:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
783:
782:
779:
775:
771:
767:
764:
762:
758:
754:
749:
745:
741:
738:
736:
733:
729:
726:
719:
715:
711:
707:
700:
699:
698:
694:
690:
686:
683:
681:
677:
673:
669:
666:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
647:
643:
639:
634:
629:
625:
622:
621:
620:
619:
616:
615:
611:
605:
603:
597:
593:
589:
585:
578:
574:
571:
568:
563:
560:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
545:
538:
535:
529:
528:
523:
517:
513:
509:
504:
503:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
470:
468:
463:dont need you
462:
460:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
436:
434:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
409:
407:
406:
403:
402:69.107.77.100
399:
395:
388:
386:
385:
381:
377:
371:
370:
367:
357:
352:
347:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
333:
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
314:
311:
307:
303:
298:
297:
294:
291:
290:72.177.34.169
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
276:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
237:a search for
234:
233:
227:
226:
223:A search for
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
192:New York City
189:
185:
182:
178:
177:
176:
175:
172:
163:
158:
154:
151:yes, it is a
150:
149:
148:
146:
142:
138:
130:
116:
99:
95:
90:
89:edit the page
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1136:
1120:
1100:
1099:
1087:
1063:
1060:
1022:65.94.76.126
995:
941:65.94.76.126
928:
927:
919:
918:
884:65.94.76.126
842:(or perhaps
826:
815:
784:
765:
739:
727:
704:— Preceding
684:
667:
650:
638:65.94.76.126
623:
613:
601:
599:
581:
543:
541:
533:
530:
474:
466:
445:
444:
440:
432:
416:
413:
400:
396:
392:
372:
362:
317:
270:
238:
231:
224:
210:
167:
134:
94:project page
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
1481:policy and
1473:policy and
1467:es:San José
1455:es:San José
1451:es:San Jose
1424:es:San Jose
1420:es:San José
1177:previous RM
1004:super speed
1000:Super Speed
213:based in a
188:This report
155:after all.
789:WP:USPLACE
689:Coolcaesar
508:Coolcaesar
478:Coolcaesar
247:Manchester
98:discussion
1257:or other
1101:Steel1943
996:shouldn't
870:Trovatore
848:Trovatore
753:Thryduulf
710:LtPowers
544:not moved
421:Yasha1969
366:TV Genius
332:Old Guard
321:TV Genius
279:TV Genius
171:TV Genius
145:SqueakBox
141:Guatemala
1538:Category
1288:San José
1284:San Jose
1189:San José
1185:San Jose
976:Dicklyon
902:Dicklyon
898:Red Meat
866:San José
862:San Jose
836:San José
832:San Jose
805:San José
801:San Jose
797:San José
793:San Jose
770:Gentgeen
748:San José
744:San Jose
718:contribs
706:unsigned
655:Dicklyon
633:San Jose
602:San José
592:San Jose
586:besides
584:San José
577:San José
562:San José
310:Twfowler
263:Gentgeen
230:one for
219:Walhello
157:Gentgeen
131:Comments
1521:Zzyzx11
1487:Zzyzx11
1402:Thanks
1398:Zzyzx11
1311:Zzyzx11
1292:Zzyzx11
1237:Zzyzx11
1216:Zzyzx11
1193:Zzyzx11
1012:call me
966:versus
787:As per
785:Comment
728:Support
676:call me
376:Vitzque
275:Burnley
1137:Oppose
1090:San jo
1014:Russ)
955:Powers
766:Oppose
740:Oppose
732:Powers
685:Oppose
678:Russ)
668:Oppose
651:Oppose
624:Oppose
493:Ykraps
239:Moscow
36:scale.
1432:wiser
1428:older
1175:(see
1167:(see
1151:(see
1041:wiser
1037:older
1008:R'n'B
1006:. --
816:Slash
672:R'n'B
614:Slash
28:This
1525:talk
1517:diff
1491:talk
1461:and
1422:and
1408:talk
1315:talk
1296:talk
1274:and
1248:talk
1220:talk
1197:talk
1127:talk
1108:talk
1026:talk
1002:and
980:talk
970:and
945:talk
906:talk
888:talk
874:talk
852:talk
811:Red
803:and
774:talk
757:talk
746:and
714:talk
693:talk
659:talk
642:talk
609:Red
552:talk
546:. --
512:talk
497:talk
482:talk
454:talk
448:. --
425:talk
380:talk
351:Talk
211:also
153:wiki
143:? --
920:Pam
548:BDD
304:or
139:in
1540::
1527:)
1511:A
1493:)
1430:≠
1410:)
1317:)
1298:)
1250:)
1222:)
1214:.
1199:)
1129:)
1110:)
1039:≠
1028:)
982:)
947:)
908:)
890:)
876:)
854:)
776:)
759:)
742:.
716:•
695:)
661:)
644:)
575:→
564:→
554:)
514:)
499:)
484:)
456:)
427:)
382:)
221:.
1523:(
1489:(
1406:(
1400::
1396:@
1313:(
1294:(
1246:(
1239::
1235:@
1218:(
1195:(
1159:(
1125:(
1106:(
1024:(
1010:(
978:(
972:—
968:–
964:-
943:(
929:D
904:(
886:(
872:(
850:(
772:(
755:(
712:(
691:(
674:(
657:(
640:(
550:(
510:(
495:(
480:(
452:(
423:(
378:(
353:)
349:(
100:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
