243:
222:
861:
Taking a square-pixels screenshot of a 720×576 movie results in 768×576 for 4:3, or 1024×576 for 16:9. If your source has been cropped to 704×576, it works out to approximately 750×576. Similar story with NTSC. I haven't seen any standard definition video which is expected to be played at wider-than-widescreen, as this article's table suggests, including, of course, live (Freeview) broadcasts. Attempting to play a 704×576 source at 4:3 (or 16:9) results in a slightly stretched image.
540:. If one of the authors wants to stand up for this work, now is your chance to do so. If you wrote it originally for this article and the site in question has lifted that. If, however, you lifted the text from that page and put it here, please just remove it and say so... and please don't do it in the future ;) I'll revisit this in a week or so to look for development. As an aside, as I look at this article, I can't help but wonder if we would be better served just redirecting
434:
364:
731:
Television? The terminology is not used in other mediums - photographs/resolutions are mega/pixels. It is like saying the temperature is hot at 25c and the next day saying 26c is hot. I know there are the 1080 and 720 formats but why wasn't megapixels good enough for this? And I notice there is
Extended Definition and Enhanced Definition available also. Seems anything to confuse the common folk is good for the industry.
191:
354:
253:
327:
730:
To my memory, when the BBC launched 625-line television, it was described as High
Definition Television, it seems a little odd that this terminology can now be applied to the present as the old HDTV becomes SDTV and a new HDTV takes over - is there really any such thing as Standard or High Definition
771:
The main page of this article leaves me wondering how many colors are possible from pixel to pixel in standard definition. Am I right to assume that the color range is greater than can be resolved by the human eye? Or is there some technical jargonese that explains which colors are possible, and
860:
While this article only covers television, I'd recommend any authors to experiment with VLC (or ffmpeg/Handbrake etc.) while playing DVDs, or any other sources where the intended resolution and pixel aspect ratio have been preserved. They will have a 16:15 aspect ratio for 4:3, and 64:45 for 16:9.
855:
I'm really not convinced by this section. The behaviour I have seen on TV equipment is a 720-wide picture uses the entire frame width (either 4:3 or 16:9), while 704 leaves 8 blank columns on either side of the image. Or more than 8 if you consider anything at the consumer level that can display
805:
Indeed there are. SMPTE 259M does not state that program content should be scaled to 704 pixels wide, nor is it a 'mistake' for broadcasters to have program content in the entire 720 samples. The difference between 720 and 704 is NOT for blanking. There are 858 samples per line. 720 are for
750:
system was called "high definition" when it was first transmitted in the 1930's. Early experimental TV systems had as few as 12 lines. For decades the term fell into disuse because all TV was in the same ballpark, so it was revived to describe the new 1000+ line systems.
806:
program content and 138 are for blanking. Also refer to BT.601 for further details. 704x480 is ratiometric with the actual size of the active picture area of NTSC video, which is 710.85 samples wide by 485 lines tall. Also, 704 is the closest modulo 16 size to 710.85.
647:
If we (very roughly) consider the standard display pixel as a E*E square, then the above approximated PAR still have an error of ~2*E on standard display and ~3*E on anamorphic display. There are better approximations which give error much less than 0.5*E, for example :
558:
Even if the author of the original content submitted this to
Knowledge, it's still not of a suitable standard for an encylopedia. The original article contains many glaring inaccuracies, biased and unsubstantiated assertations and some complete gibberish. Here are some
598:
Yeah, I agree that the quality of the content of the article is pretty low. However, I wasn't about to start trying to fix an article that may be about to be deleted anyways. I suspect I will be soon deleting vast swaths of this one and suggesting a merge with
443:
337:
153:
643:
720/480 * 10/11 = 15/11 for standard "4/3" NTSC display 720/576 * 12/11 = 15/11 for standard "4/3" PAL display 720/480 * 40/33 = 20/11 for anamorphic "16/9" NTSC display 720/576 * 16/11 = 20/11 for anamorphic "16/9" PAL display
636:
Therefore, the PAR of NTSC 720/480 is the same as of NTSC 704/480, i.e. 10/11 standardly and 40/33 anamorphically. Similarly the PAR of PAL 720/576 is the same as of PAL 704/576, i.e. 12/11 standardly and 40/33 anamorphically.
909:
448:
579:"SDTV will give a greater range of choice in the type of viewing material you will be able to access. Children's programs, documentaries, films, and public affairs -- the choice will be far greater than before."
623:
They were all derrived from the assumption that the active display area, i.e. one of perfect aspect ratio 4/3 (16/9) is the entire 720*480 and 720*576 display, which is wrong. The actual active display area is
904:
914:
711:
It has to do with the resolution, not the aspect ratio. The reference provided also does not support the claim - it doesn't define SDTV. SDTV is 480i, EDTV is 480p, and HDTV is 720p, 1080i or 1080p.--
147:
44:
836:". E.g. the USA no longer broadcasts SDTV, right? Maybe wording under should reflect that, that this is only historical info. Any idea how non-mainstream SDTV is not and non-16:9?
889:
309:
299:
884:
509:
Have fun. This is a great service, wikipedia. Best wishes. I'm not logged in - you may acknowledge to me at basketx7@7aol.com. (Remove spam-fighting 7s first.)
275:
899:
786:
No you definitely should not assume that. NTSC color TV never had a great gamut, and was later degraded from the original spec to use brighter phosphors.
424:
414:
79:
640:
Unlike the 704-vertical-line (NTSC and PAL) display, for 720-vertical-line one the display aspect ratio (DAR) is no longer 4/3 (or 16/9). Indeed, it is
856:
images without overscan will almost certainly be an HD display, and therefore upscaled, but going there is making life complicated for no good reason.
866:
919:
894:
266:
227:
620:
The pixel aspect ratios (PARs) listed for NTSC 720/480 and PAL 720/576 (8/9, 16/15 and their anamorphic counterparts, 64/45, 32/27) are incorrect.
512:
386:
168:
85:
862:
773:
668:
390:
135:
810:
787:
689:
524:
809:
This article is poor enough it should be fixed by a subject matter expert (which I am not), or should be deleted and redirected.
377:
332:
129:
99:
30:
541:
104:
24:
20:
125:
74:
202:
175:
65:
564:"SDTV is a digital format that provides a high quality picture, very similar to that of digital versatile disk."
709:
In USA, SDTV refers to digital television broadcast in 4:3 aspect ratio, the same aspect ratio as NTSC signals.
258:
777:
672:
190:
814:
791:
693:
520:
141:
109:
242:
221:
569:"The quality of these new digital transmissions will become the standard for the future of broadcasting."
516:
208:
664:
584:"These television sets were very expensive, much like when the first compact disc players appeared."
686:
Actually PAL video is 702x576 and not 704x576, the PAR for 4:3 is 128/117 and for 16:9 is 1024/702.
841:
161:
55:
274:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
604:
549:
70:
736:
369:
271:
51:
870:
845:
818:
795:
781:
760:
740:
720:
697:
676:
607:
593:
552:
473:
is not coded exactly right, or maybe there is a glitch in the Search-engine, or something,
716:
433:
382:
489:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Standard-definition_television&action=edit
504:
Search
Knowledge for Standard-definition television - it might be called something else.
837:
756:
687:
574:"In order to fully experience SDTV or HDTV, you will need to buy a new television set."
477:
878:
470:
You DO have an article called "Standard-definition television." I have been reading
363:
732:
658:
Jukka Aho: A Quick Guide to
Digital Video Resolution and Aspect Ratio Conversions.
654:
PAR = 72/79 or (even better) PAR = 4320/4739 for NTSC 720/480 and NTSC 704/480.
590:
385:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
712:
359:
248:
752:
659:
537:
747:
381:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about
353:
326:
833:
829:
600:
545:
499:
We don't have an article called "Standard-definition television"
184:
15:
910:
High-importance
Broadcast engineering and technology articles
475:
but, you DO have an article of that title. It is located at
828:"SDTV resolution by nation; different countries use either
432:
905:
Start-Class
Broadcast engineering and technology articles
915:
Broadcast engineering and technology task force articles
488:
486:
this page I am typing into, which page is addressed at
536:
Looks like vast swaths of this article are taken from
478:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Standard-definition_television
160:
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
444:
the
Broadcast engineering and technology task force
484:Here's the erroneous text that appears at top of
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
389:. To improve this article, please refer to the
651:PAR = 128/117 for PAL 720/576 and PAL 704/576
627:710.85 * 486 for NTSC 702 * 576 for PAL
174:
8:
494:Editing Talk:Standard-definition television
188:
890:Low-importance Telecommunications articles
589:I vote this article be removed forthwith.
321:
216:
660:http://www.iki.fi/znark/video/conversion/
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Telecommunications
885:Start-Class Telecommunications articles
323:
287:Template:WikiProject Telecommunications
218:
726:Standard Definition / High Definition
633:704 * 480 for NTSC 704 * 576 for PAL
7:
767:Color range for standard definition?
375:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
900:Mid-importance television articles
14:
399:Knowledge:WikiProject Television
362:
352:
325:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
920:WikiProject Television articles
895:Start-Class television articles
863:Here for the one billionth edit
419:This article has been rated as
402:Template:WikiProject Television
304:This article has been rated as
542:Standard-definition television
472:it! Maybe, your <HEAD: -->
267:WikiProject Telecommunications
25:Standard-definition television
1:
772:how many colors there are?
677:15:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
616:Incorrect Pixel Aspect Ratios
441:This article is supported by
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
871:23:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
698:14:12, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
527:) 17:49, May 28, 2006 (UTC)
497:Jump to: navigation, search
290:Telecommunications articles
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
936:
846:14:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
746:Even the original British
721:16:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
608:16:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
594:12:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
553:22:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
425:project's importance scale
310:project's importance scale
741:01:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
440:
418:
347:
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
819:06:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
796:06:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
782:05:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
761:05:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
630:or, taken approximately
259:Telecommunication portal
824:Time to change the map?
437:
378:WikiProject Television
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
515:comment was added by
436:
393:for the type of work.
100:Neutral point of view
801:Glaring Inaccuracies
532:Copyright Violation?
105:No original research
405:television articles
387:join the discussion
383:television programs
851:Pixel aspect ratio
704:Definition of SDTV
438:
281:Telecommunications
272:Telecommunications
228:Telecommunications
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
679:
667:comment added by
528:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
370:Television portal
320:
319:
316:
315:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
927:
662:
510:
407:
406:
403:
400:
397:
391:style guidelines
372:
367:
366:
356:
349:
348:
343:
340:
329:
322:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
935:
934:
930:
929:
928:
926:
925:
924:
875:
874:
853:
826:
803:
769:
728:
706:
618:
534:
511:—The preceding
468:
449:High-importance
404:
401:
398:
395:
394:
368:
361:
341:
335:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
257:
252:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
933:
931:
923:
922:
917:
912:
907:
902:
897:
892:
887:
877:
876:
859:
852:
849:
825:
822:
802:
799:
774:216.99.198.124
768:
765:
764:
763:
727:
724:
705:
702:
701:
700:
682:
669:118.68.183.131
657:
617:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
586:
585:
581:
580:
576:
575:
571:
570:
566:
565:
561:
560:
538:this page here
533:
530:
507:
506:
505:
500:
498:
496:
495:
491:
487:
485:
481:
480:
476:
474:
471:
467:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
439:
429:
428:
421:Mid-importance
417:
411:
410:
408:
374:
373:
357:
345:
344:
342:Mid‑importance
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:Low-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
276:the discussion
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
932:
921:
918:
916:
913:
911:
908:
906:
903:
901:
898:
896:
893:
891:
888:
886:
883:
882:
880:
873:
872:
868:
864:
857:
850:
848:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
823:
821:
820:
816:
812:
811:146.115.66.42
807:
800:
798:
797:
793:
789:
788:146.115.66.42
784:
783:
779:
775:
766:
762:
758:
754:
749:
745:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
725:
723:
722:
718:
714:
710:
703:
699:
695:
691:
690:77.113.93.250
688:
685:
684:
683:
680:
678:
674:
670:
666:
661:
655:
652:
649:
645:
641:
638:
634:
631:
628:
625:
621:
615:
609:
606:
605:Reverend Loki
602:
597:
596:
595:
592:
588:
587:
583:
582:
578:
577:
573:
572:
568:
567:
563:
562:
557:
556:
555:
554:
551:
550:Reverend Loki
547:
543:
539:
531:
529:
526:
522:
518:
517:63.210.89.130
514:
503:
502:
501:
492:
490:
482:
479:
465:
450:
447:(assessed as
446:
445:
435:
431:
430:
426:
422:
416:
413:
412:
409:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
371:
365:
360:
358:
355:
351:
350:
346:
339:
334:
331:
328:
324:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
858:
854:
827:
808:
804:
785:
770:
729:
708:
707:
681:
656:
653:
650:
646:
642:
639:
635:
632:
629:
626:
622:
619:
548:instead. --
535:
508:
493:
483:
469:
466:SDTV article
442:
420:
376:
338:Broadcasting
305:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
663:—Preceding
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
879:Categories
396:Television
333:Television
838:comp.arch
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
748:405 line
665:unsigned
525:contribs
513:unsigned
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
733:pebbens
423:on the
308:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
591:M0thr4
205:scale.
126:Google
713:RLent
603:. --
559:gems:
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
867:talk
842:talk
834:576i
830:480i
815:talk
792:talk
778:talk
757:talk
753:Algr
737:talk
717:talk
694:talk
673:talk
601:480i
546:480i
521:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
832:or
544:to
415:Mid
300:Low
176:TWL
881::
869:)
844:)
817:)
794:)
780:)
759:)
739:)
719:)
696:)
675:)
523:•
451:).
336::
156:)
54:;
865:(
840:(
813:(
790:(
776:(
755:(
735:(
715:(
692:(
671:(
519:(
427:.
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
