1775:
Amritraj in 2010. That a top-ranked athlete (Amritraj won 16 international tennis titles between 1973 and 1988) appears in the film seems to me to be a cameo “worth mentioning”. It is ironic to me that previous contributors have removed references to
Amritraj citing “unreliable” sources, namely Memory Alpha and IMDB. Yet both publishers are noted at the article’s close, presumably as ones the authors believed to have some credibility. Further, the names of several other cast members -- one uncredited -- appear in the article with no citations at all. One can only speculate about the biases of those who feel Amritraj’s name is unworthy of mention in this article.
233:
more literate than people are today. I think it'd be no problem at all for people to do a little research and then competently defend themselves. It'd be no harder than compiling a master's degree thesis at a modern university, and plenty of total idiots can manage that. Now, I'm not saying there wouldn't still be experts on law and even law specialists. But the current system, where the law as a system is closed to outsiders, where buying a lawyer's services isn't a free choice but is forced upon you, would definitely not be allowed to exist in the liberalized society depicted in Trek.
1816:"Layla said to the others that she had never engaged in this acting thing before and asked what she should do. They told her to act naturally. With the cameras rolling, Layla walked down the street into shot and soon came to the spot where Uhura and Chekov were unsuccessfully trying to find out from passing pedestrians where the nuclear wessels were. Most of the extras who were asked this question looked at the two like they were from another planet and carried on. Layla, however, answered them. Naturally."
31:
199:
sounds like a form of money to me! My guess is that it's possible that "credits" are a form of money issued to
Federation citizens who are coming into contact with members of societies that still use money (like the Ferengi); they give the others the credits, which can be redeemed for certain set goods by the Federation itself. Ie., they're a government-backed security used for trade with less-developed societies.
1386:
of set locations may be, they do not illustrate why it was recognized in this manner like a shot of the film does. I'd track down something myself, but this isn't my baby, so I'll leave the decision for the most informative shot to someone else. Remember guys, fair use isn't suffocatingly strict; we can justify an un-free image here or there (though the above suggested video is a bit excessive for the project).--
209:
lawyers to exist. After all, if you could understand the law yourself, why would you need a lawyer? It's the most brilliant, and obvious, scam in our society. The
Federation, though, seems to me to be a society that would be pretty intolerant of large-scale scams. My guess is that the laws in the Federation are understood by the citizens, so no one needs lawyers. If accused, they defend themselves.
1138:
344:, it's just unlikely that it's Nimoy unless he's effecting a different voice. I just put on my DVD (I don't have closed captioning). Obviously it's not Spock, who in the very next scene is still on Vulcan, nor does it sound like Leonard Nimoy to me. Nimoy was directing, so maybe he decided to alter his voice and throw that line out. But I don't think it's him.
710:, he states that they did indeed use hidden cameras and that the woman was NOT an extra but that they loved her interaction with Nichols and Koenig so much that they later approached her to offer her payment for that scene's inclusion. Haven't seen the DVD interview you mention, but Nimoy's statement in the book directly contradicts what you assert.
1864:
697:
had made up herself and so it was decided to sign her up as an actor and keep her dialogue in. I think it is doubtful these scenes were filmed with hidden camera as they also state that the policeman on the motorbike was a real policeman assigned to facilitate the filming that day and that he was drafted in as an extra.
1824:
more cites to support this. At any rate, to say that she was told not to speak and disobeyed her instructions would not seem consistent with the cite - surely she'd have said if she had done so. I've "been bold" and corrected it. I'll see if I can find out more and do say if anyone has more cites on this.
2059:
I find all this fuss over the question of swearing more than a bit ridiculous. All that was said about swearing was that Spock noted that Kirk's use of "colorful metaphors" had INCREASED. It was never stated or even implied that there was no swearing in the future or that Kirk himself never swore.
2011:
Actually, the animal is an ass- the male is a 'jack', the female is a 'jenny'. ("Donkey' is a relatively late invention and comes from 'dun', referring to the animal's color.) The anatomical word is unrelated to the animal; it's an
American corruption of the British 'arse'. Terms like "you're an ass"
1926:
in a Star Trek production? While Kirk and Spock are riding in
Gillian Taylor's truck, she wants to know if they are with the military and if perhaps they want to teach aquatic mammals to "retrieve torpedoes or some dipshit stuff like that?" and Kirk replies, "No, ma'am, no dipshit." As far as I know,
1899:
This part of the Trivia makes no sense. How many times during the original series did we hear "dammit" come out of Bones' mouth? I call that a swear. Swearing is clearly alive and well in the 23rd century. I'm thinking of deleting that paragraph from the trivia. (Even though the "double dumb ass
1545:
Still needs to be sourced reliably. Whether you consider it obvious is not enough - but if (as you say) the comparison has been made thousands of times, then it shouldn't be hard to provide a more reliable source than IMDB - which is not considered realiable, and scifi movie page just says "reminded
844:
Both are reliable sources, so it's not a matter of who's "correct". I'm not seeing how they are necessarily contradictory. We simply don't know how much of it was written into the script (by Meyer) and how much Nimoy either contributed to during script development or during filming itself. Here's the
696:
The number of permutations of this myth makes it very difficult to figure out the truth. William
Shatner and Leonard Nimoy recount a different version of this tale in the commentary on the DVD release. In their version, the woman was an extra who was determined to use this piece of dialogue which she
653:
The scenes in which Uhura and Chekov asked passersby (including a police officer) where the "nuclear wessels" were located were filmed via hidden camera. The passersby were not actors and were unaware that they were being filmed. It was intended that Chekov's
Russian accent combined with the unusual
1839:
The source says nothing about whether the other extras had been given instructions before she joined them. Therefore, to say that they had been given instructions is OR and I've removed the sentence you added. We summarize sources; we do not provide readers with "the most natural interpretation" or
1472:
The Star Trek probe looks like the
Rendezvous with Rama spacecraft, except for the sphere. The comparison has been made thousands of times over the years, even back when the film was new. Yes. lots of journalists and film reviewers have made the comparisons, not just forum posts on Star Trek fan
1385:
I would like to echo these old sentiments on needing to work in at least one screenshot into the article. As anal as we can be about having as few non-free images as possible, I think it's important to remember that the film secured an Oscar nomination for best cinematography. And as great pictures
605:
Also, I've never heard anybody refer to
Superman 3 as "the one with Richard Pryor in." It may just be me, it may be that he's slightly less of a celebrity in the UK, I don't know. And as you say, SineBot, given the number of Trek movies, it may be a good way to distinguish it from the bunch. Surely
1774:
There is no dispute whatsoever about Mr. Amritraj's appearance in Star Trek IV. He is fully credited, and is quite recognizable in the film. I have today restored the information citing multiple credible sources, including the Press Trust of India and the Rolex Awards of
Excellence, which honoured
1425:
had any effect on conservation efforts or reduction in whaling? I think I once read that following the movie, hunting of humpbacks essentially stopped altogether. I'm not sure that could be correct the Knowledge article on humpback whales article says the ban has been in place since 1966, 20 years
972:
Is is absolutely necessary to provide a citation for an audio track? It is not likley printed anywhere that the composer reused or reworked parts of the animated Lord of the Rings soundtrack for use on this one, but it is evident when listened to. I'll post a couple of quick YouTube links here so
447:
I happen to be Finnish and can confirm that the whaler's DO speak Finnish. The whalers are deffenitely yelling "Mitä helvettiä!" (What the hell?) when the Bird of Pray turns off its cloaking device. Additionally when the harpoon hits the ship one of the men clearly says "Mitä hittoa tuo on?" (What
289:
Twice now I have posted up an item in the Trivia section talking about a particular scene. The scene in question is where the Klingon ambassador says, "Remember this well! There shall be no peace as long as Kirk lives!". As he storms out a voice, Leonard Nimoy, calls out "You pompous ass!" This is
222:
I suppose. I was mostly thinking of personal injury, contract law, corporate law, and divorce attorneys. I don't think that laws would be all that simple, after all contact with the various alien species, with complex societal, cultural, and legal differences differences from humanity, both inside
208:
for lawyers. The reason we need lawyers in our society is that the laws are deliberately made to be incomprehensible without specialized training (by using archaic forms of language, for instance). The only logical reason to make the laws incomprehensible to the public is to provide a reason for
95:
Regarding the trivia tidbit claiming that the people on the street in the "nuclear wessels" bit are actually random passersby in SF, and not actors: Though ST was not yet the cultural juggernaut it is in 2005, wouldn't Koenig and Nichols be recognized in their twentieth year as Chekov & Uhura?
1823:
The most natural interpretation is surely that she joined the extras after they had been given the instructions not to speak to Checkov and Uhura, and so didn't get the instruction, and took her instruction to "act naturally" as including responding to questions. Perhaps we can see if we can find
1271:
Well, this is a biggie -- lots of detail so I assume you'll be moving to FAC before long -- reckon it should do okay there. I haven't verified all references by any means but the sources look reliable, images appear to be correctly licensed, coverage is full and unbiased, and the prose is fine.
1007:
Then since a citation is not likely to be found unless someone actually posts it, perhaps the line should simply be rephrased to something like "as the writer of the Lord of Rings (1978) soundtrack, the Star Trek IV soundtrack has many similarities to the previous work", or perhaps even something
232:
Well, yes, but if you were going to be involved in a case, all you would have to do would be to do some basic research on the applicable laws. The laws wouldn't be written in today's deliberately-incomprehensible lawyerese code, and it's already been demonstrated that Federation citizens are far
1449:
I'm going to say it definitely had no effect on humpback whale conservation. By 1966 there were at best only a few thousand humpbacks worldwide out of a population that once numbered over 125,000. The moratorium on commercial whaling did come into effect in 1986, but that had more to do with the
463:
Not really a gaffe. Many Starfleet ships are named after battles, such as Saratoga and Yorktown (well, they're really named after famous warships, usually USN, but that's a detail). It's not out of the question that the Leningrad was named after the siege of the city during the second world war.
176:
right, because this only takes place a mere 300 years in the future, I can't imagine that they would ever make any changes to the US criminal justice system in a mere 3 centuries.. It's a movie! for all we know they don't enter pleas at all, and they're judged by flipping a tribble, heads you're
117:
The scene with Chekov and Uhura asking passerby where Alameda and the U.S. Enterprise were was completely unscripted, as was the young lady's clueless response, "Ooh, I don't think I know the answer to that one - I think it's in the bay, in Alameda." Crew had to chase her down after the shot was
1641:
In the article, the scene where Spock uses the Vulcan nerve pinch on a punk rocker listening to obnoxiously loud music on a bus is attributed to Nicholas Meyer, from a scene supposedly cut from a previous film of his, Time After Time. But in the commentary for Star Trek IV, by Leonard Nimoy and
198:
Well, the question remains, what would anyone do anything for? For love of doing it, I suppose. The concept of a money-less society is a very complicated idea which I don't think the show's creators ever really thought much about. Especially since sometimes they mention "credits", which sure
103:
Well, the thing is, under SAG (Screen Actors' Guild) rules, anyone who speaks on camera has to be paid for their time as an actor. Anyone crossing in front of the camera was probably asked not to speak. The story goes that the brunette lady who tried to be "helpful" ("it's across the bay, in
1970:
Um, just to point out, I think this needs to be removed. I distinctly remember both Kirk and Scotty calling Harry Mudd a jackass in "Mudd's Women". Who came up with this anyway? I say we either edit it to say that it is the first time the word is said in a movie or get rid of it altogether. -
448:
the heck is that?). Finally the guy on the crow's nest actually says "Siellä se puhaltaa!" which would literally translate as "There it/she blows!" which sounds rather ridiculous in Finnish, but the over-all pronounciation seems to indicate that the whaler's were not professional actors. -
1405:
hovering (after decloaking) over the water in front of the whaling ship. Another possibility would be a shot of the crew walking down the streets of San Francisco, looking like a cadet review, as it would show what the cast looked like. What aspects of the cinematography were lauded?
382:
It wasn't. Those items which could be sourced or which were relevant were integrated with the rest of the article. Paragraphs are good. Furthermore, Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and we're especially not a carbon copy of IMDb, nor Memory Alpha.
741:
The popularity of this film with the general public, the highest grossing Star Trek movie to date, prompted the decision to make a new spinoff series, which became Star Trek: The Next Generation. A teaser for Star Trek: The Next Generation was played before the film in some
1546:
me of Rama" - which is not much better. Don't get me wrong, I agree that the two are similar, but I don't think it's worth mentioning - there are literally thousands of fictional space ships out there, so some are bound to look similar, whether intentionally or not.
312:
One basic problem with it is that at the time the Klingon ambassador says it, to the Federation leaders, Spock is on Vulcan being picked up by the rest of the crew, who are flying a Klingon vessel and heading back to earth. Maybe somebody yells it, but it's not Spock.
573:
And Superman 3 is "the one with Richard Pryor in it"... yet its just not apropiate or encyclopedic to place it here. Though when there are 10 or so Star Trek movies and numerous episodes, "the one with whales" seems to be a good way to recognize it from the bunch.
1103:
Since much of the film takes place in the present day, it seems feasible that real-world photos and free alternatives can be considered for many frames; likewie, the lack of many signature special effects sequences means that the opportunity for non-free images is
1819:"The problem was, she wasn't supposed to say anything. But, because she did, the filmmakers decided that this was good, spontaneous stuff and that they should use it! A bit of rancor by fellow extras aside, Layla's star was now lit and hanging in the firmament."
1642:
William Shatner, Nimoy claims he wrote the scene into the film after encountering a similar situation in real life, wishing he really were Spock, so he could shut the man up. This commentary occurs at 45 minutes on my version, during the specified scene.
74:
Does anyone know what the actual name of the Pizza parlor is that Kirk and Gillian visit? If so, is it still standing? For the record, the hospital and glass factory are both still active buildings in San Francisco, in case anyone is planning a visit.
431:
If I would have to guess (without any real linguistic knowledge), I'd say it sounds like Icelandic. This could be way off, though. But I can rather confidently say that it is not Swedish. Not the words, pronounciation, nor "speech melody" fits into it.
674:
some extras involved in that scene, but Nimoy has made it clear that they also took advantage of the hidden camera to get reactions from random passersby as well. It's not made clear how just how many extras versus non-extras were involved.
187:
hehe ""The justice system works swiftly in the future now that they've abolished all lawyers." Not the right sci fi series, but probably accurate. I mean, star trek doesn't have money do they? and without money, what would lawyers do it for?
1789:
If you would like to point out which minor roles or cameos are not cited, that can be addressed. I see none that are. I've cleaned up your citation spam. And your casting aspersions is pretty damn stupid. There's no conspiracy to spite you.
940:
Ah, okay. But the fair use rationale says one of the purposes is "to provide the reader with a clear indicator they have reached the proper article." That purpose is not well fulfilled by an image without the film's distinctive wordmark.
424:
I'm Swedish, and listening to the two whaler-phraces I found: I can tell you it does not sound like any Swedish I've ever heard :) And besides... the geographic location of Sweden has provided for a very small population of whalers.
1035:, and it is clear that Mr. Rosenman has a distinct sound that appears to carry through many of his films. Although similar musical phrases and styles are often used, they are often mistakenly stated to be the same but are not. --
326:
Additionally, I said it was Leonard Nimoy who said it. I didn't say it was Spock. An important distinction. Nimoy said it while directing the scene, and the sound folks left it in, either as a joke or cause they didn't notice it.
928:
Commonality, as in the shared attributes. The NTSC DVD, Laserdisc, and VHS covers all used the same art work, although things like the logos, type, and text changed. In that way the art itself is the most representative aspect.
533:
If you read the novel version, you can find part of the answer. it appears that they simply wanted to converse with the whales, but that the whales alkso performed some sort of role as story-tellers, and perhaps philosophers.
167:
There should have been no lengthy trial after Kirk and crew returned to Earth. Almost immediately upon entering the council chambers, Kirk pleads guilty to the charges, on behalf of himself and the crew". Trials take place
957:
I am still of the opinion that the film's distinctive wordmark is a significant part of the identification of the film, and so to use a version of the poster without it is not maximizing the image's encyclopedic value.
654:
nature of his request would dissuade people from offering assistance. In the end, when a young woman does stop and offer some directions, the directors felt it was so comical that they decided it had to be included.
1909:
The only time anyone swore in the original series was Kirk's "Let's get the hell out of here" in "City on the Edge of Forever". McCoy's well-known "Dammit, Jim" didn't come into existence until the feature films.
1092:
I'm going to try and push this towards GA or FA quality this autumn. One thing it's missing are some non-free images where they could be justified. Musing to myself (or anyone else) about what should be included:
1477:
This is mostly relevant because Clarke is relevant as a Sci Fi writer, Star Trek is relevant as a Sci Fi multimedia franchise, and similarities between the 2 (intentional or unintentional) are worth referencing.
1252:
in San Diego and LA respectively, within a few days of each other, so the article brought back pleasant memories... Both fish-out-of-water stories that couldn't help but resonate with a traveller... ;-) Cheers,
223:
and outside the federation, would be such that lawyers would surely be more like cultural experts for various societies. No one person could know all the rules and regs for any given situation, not even spock.
1728:
Knowledge prioritizes verifiable and reliable secondary sources, not least because they help describe scope and coverage. Why would Amritraj's cameo be worth mentioning if no reliable source comments on it?
2036:
23:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC) - I just saw a Spanish-dubbed version of this film. Curiously (and disturbingly), the phrase "Spanish Inquisition" was changed to "African witchcraft" (brujerĂa africana). Hmmm.
616:
The article refers to whales as a major plot element; that is enough, in the article itself, to confirm once a reader has found it that this is "the one...". The other thing required is a redirect; enter
275:
I'm surprised to see no discussion of the drastic change in appearance of interior of the Bird of Prey between Search For Spock and this movie. Is there anything out there about the reasons for this? --
2060:
It was NOTHING MORE THAN A JOKE, a dig at 20th century culture, that people swore so much and so often that Kirk believed he wouldn't be listened to unless his own speech reflected that of the times.
596:
I was going to bring this up. More specifically, I was going to ask if its referred to as 'the one with the whales' outside the UK. However, where should this piece of info be included in the article?
1947:("Broken Bow"), when Captain Archer, fed up with T'Pol's prattling on about how humans can't control their emotions, asks her rhetorically if she has any idea how much he'd "like to knock on ass."
354:
Sounded to me like it was him, I've been told by people it was him. But even if it's not, the mere fact that someone's shouting "You pompous ass!" at an ambassador is trivial enough to be trivia. :)
1143:
1658:
1622:
I added relevant portals, as long as they themselves were fairly good quality. i did not add the portal for film in the US, as its nowhere near as developed as the film portal. (mercurywoodrose)
747:
If the sucess of this film prompted TNG, surely the film would have finished its run before they would have a chance to develop trailers, and therefore couldnt have put them in before the film!
606:
we could have a note somewhere in the article - not necessarily in the leading paragraph - but somewhere on the page, that ST:IV is often referred to popularly as "the one with the whales".
1813:"After speaking with the assistant director on whether she could get a day's work, she was told she could and was instructed to stand with the group of extras already hired for the day."
401:
I am almost, (but not absolutely) certain that the whalers do NOT speak finnish. it sounds to me like swedish. this is approximately what I hear as the harpoon is deflected in "mid air"
1980:
A jackass is a donkey, and maybe terms like "smartass" and "dumbass" have more to do with donkeys than with anatomy. In any case, it's kind of silly. Now, when Kirk told his crew in
1570:
Hi, I'm not sure how to fix this, but the main article lists George Lucas as the film's producer. Obviously someone has intentionally changed it. Someone should fix this, thanks.
1473:
sites. It is a fact that both designs are similar (because they are both simple 3D shapes, you cannot dispute the similarity or you are disputing what a cylinder looks like).
1875:
323:
Oh, it's not bogus. Listen closely to the dialogue. Once you know what it is, you can't help but hear it. Plus, as I said, it's verified in the subtitles on the DVD version.
1312:"The probe's effects on Earth include generating cloud cover and vaporizing the oceans." -- this one-sentence para just sort of hangs there: 1) shouldn't we be discussing
1148:
164:"It is evident that a number of months must elapse between the crew returning to Earth and later taking command of the NCC-1701-A, in order to allow for a trial ..."
1176:
634:
Many people know this movie solely as "the one with the whales", and thus cataloging it as such would aid users in searching for and finding the correct article. -
1097:
A short video clip of the Probe running around, making sounds would help the production design and audio section, esp. since the audio described is very abstract.
875:
As mentioned in the image fair use pages, the commonality in things like home video releases and the theatrical posters, merchandise and promotion, et al, is the
1982:
1922:"The film marks the first use of the word 'ass' in a Star Trek production." True, but isn't it more significant that the film marks the first use of the word
1684:
I can't believe there is a dispute about this. I just checked on Netfilx and he is in the movie and listed in the cast list at the end as 'Starship Captain'.
1667:
The content you speak of is mentioned in the article (under filming); however it's not mutually exclusive with the idea that the scene originated with Meyer.
1166:
2012:
refer to the animal's reputation for stubborness and have no origin in anatomy. 'Asshole' as an insult is probably a convergent term, not of direct origin.
1441:
I didn't come across anything that touched on that topic in researching the article, so I'm going to tentatively say it didn't have any great effect.
1194:
2067:
1586:
1427:
717:
682:
172:
the entering of a plea (of not guilty) - not before. Upon entering a guilty plea, a court moves to sentencing, much as happened in the film.
135:
I could have sworn they were all extras except for the woman who actually answered the question... Oh well..--03:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
845:
quote from Meyer: "There was this scene with a boy and a radio that never made it into the finished film for various reasons" (Fischer 37).
825:
The article gives two contradictory origins for the bit with the Spock and the punk: one attributes it to a similar cut scene from Meyer’s
661:
extras, with the exception of the one who actually gave them an answer, who just happened to be passing by because she lived in the area.--
504:
468:
If you can accept the concepts of the matter transporter and of backwards time travel, nothing else presents any serious logic problems.
806:
581:
2044:
1857:
1654:
1475:
Keep in mind: I did not say they copied the idea, or used it as a reference or even as inspiration. I simply said they look similar.
1036:
47:
17:
1623:
1032:
766:
1913:
I think that swearing is probably more the scatalogical and vulgar swearing of today, not such harsh epithets as hell and damnit
1650:
1479:
1529:
1171:
998:
Especially when dealing with audio, in which different people can hear different things, a citation is absolutely required.
788:
This is no joke , they really did figure out how to make transparent aluminum using lasers . Check it out in Science Daily :
478:
By the way, are there any names for Saint Petersburg that do not revere the icons of an authoritarian repressive regime?
1218:
This looks pretty decent on first glance; will review in more detail and leave comments over the next few days. Cheers,
1022:
The less direct we get, the less relevant it is. I'd remove it unless some sort of supporting evidence can be found.
558:
1455:
1338:
The $ 21 million mentioed here disagrees with the $ 24 million mentioned in the infobox -- they should be consistent.
625:
38:
441:
418:
1582:
1431:
865:
to revert a good-faith reversion? Perhaps a discussion would be in order instead of treating me like a vandal?
2071:
1884:
1829:
1757:
1719:
1689:
721:
686:
508:
85:
For the record, no longer an active question. Apparently the pizzia parlor was a set built on a sound stage. -
1935:, when Data, seeing the Enterprise-D's saucer section about to hit the atmosphere of Veridian III, says, "Oh,
482:
For about a week after the October-but-it-was-really-November Revolution, the city was called "Libertyville".
104:
Alameda"), was a stranger whose response was considered so worthwhile that she was paid for her speaking role.
810:
585:
2048:
1871:
1607:
1551:
618:
1627:
770:
748:
524:
1451:
1190:
1040:
178:
1948:
1505:
Is it necessary to point any source (googling I found this one, but I guess it doesn't have much wegith:
2075:
2052:
2016:
1994:
1975:
1965:
1951:
1932:
1917:
1904:
1889:
1849:
1833:
1796:
1784:
1761:
1735:
1723:
1705:
1693:
1673:
1631:
1611:
1590:
1555:
1533:
1499:
1487:
1459:
1435:
1410:
1395:
1377:
1363:
1351:
1262:
1239:
1227:
1213:
1117:
1107:
Video of the mind meld? Is it large enough/long enough to show the merging of different sourced content?
1069:
1055:
1044:
1026:
1017:
1002:
990:
962:
945:
935:
923:
914:
905:
869:
851:
838:
814:
774:
751:
725:
701:
690:
665:
643:
628:
622:
610:
600:
589:
567:
538:
527:
512:
486:
472:
452:
438:
390:
376:
358:
348:
334:
317:
307:
297:
279:
276:
258:
237:
227:
213:
192:
181:
154:
130:
97:
89:
79:
1752:
But the film itself is a primary source. Why is a secondary source prioritized over a primary source?
2063:
2040:
1646:
1578:
1574:
1517:
1483:
802:
762:
713:
678:
577:
500:
2033:
1521:
2029:
1879:
1825:
1753:
1715:
1685:
1525:
1065:
1013:
986:
564:
387:
830:
415:
1972:
1845:
1603:
1547:
1391:
1373:
1347:
1258:
1223:
1209:
791:
639:
1031:
It has taken some time, but I have reviewed more soundtracks by Leonard Rosenman, in particular
372:
trivia section blanked? Maybe send it to a separate article, but not blank the entire thing. -
1316:
these effects were created, not simply what they were; 2) in any case the para needs citation.
1285:
834:
607:
597:
449:
698:
1791:
1780:
1730:
1700:
1668:
1494:
1442:
1358:
1301:"...lighting the model practically" -- don't quite understand the use of "practically" here.
1234:
1112:
1050:
930:
900:
846:
1450:
little whaling of other species (particularly antarctic minke, sperm, fin, etc.) going on.
829:, the other to Nimoy having had a similar encounter in New York. Which is correct, please?
355:
331:
294:
293:
Twice posted, twice removed. What is unacceptable about this most trival bit of trivia?
1991:
1962:
1513:). I think the similarity is pretty obvious and has relevance. jackbravo 22 May 2012.
1320:
1280:
1061:
1009:
982:
896:
483:
469:
384:
345:
314:
304:
428:
And "vilket helvetes tull..." is 1. Not pronounced that way. 2. Total gibberish :)
1914:
1841:
1426:
before the movie was made. But, has anyone else heard of Star Trek having an impact?
1407:
1387:
1369:
1343:
1254:
1219:
1205:
1023:
999:
959:
942:
920:
911:
888:
866:
662:
635:
255:
224:
189:
1901:
1699:
No one has yet supplied a reliable source, unlike the other casting info provided.
892:
884:
373:
234:
210:
127:
86:
76:
2032:
to me." -- McCoy to Kirk in the hospital elevator, on their way to save Chekov. -
1327:
shot at their studio..." -- whose studio (not the humpback whales' I assume)? ;-)
1244:
Couldn't resist -- as a young Aussie on my first trip to the States in '86 I saw
2013:
1776:
1324:
880:
535:
151:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1510:
1506:
1060:
I'm in agreement that any similarity should not be indicated in the article.--
978:
974:
204:
As for the moneyless society, my guess is that they probably have a lot less
1049:
Either way, we need more than *just* a review to make most such assertions.
118:
taken to get her to sign a SAG waiver and permission to use her in the film.
1197:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
464:
Another thing Star Trek is good for is coming up with lame explanations.
1863:
406:
approximate meaning: "what the hell is this nonsense..."
1272:
Aside from my little ce, just a few minor concerns before passing...
553:
source to fill in the cite that's left wanting, but nevertheless an
177:
guilty, tails it's a mistrial, no pesky juries getting in the way--
657:
This isn't exactly true. If I remember correctly, the people were
919:
Could you perhaps elaborate? I'm still not sure what you meant.
147:
1961:
has always done is to inspire intellectual discourse. Like dis.
759:
The tralers wer placed at the start oif the VHS movie release
621:
in the Search box and click Go - this was set up a year ago. -
405:- "vilket helvetes tull..." - <sound of ship decloaking: -->
25:
1870:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
792:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090727130814.htm
1862:
559:
Everything2 node titled "I liked the one with the whales"
1599:
862:
1931:
was not uttered in a Star Trek production again until
973:
perhaps it can be enough proof: Star Trek IV titles -
412:
are any scandinavians able to confirm or reject this?
1598:
Done, thanks for pointing it out. It was changed in
879:, not the poster. It's the same reason that entries
821:
The Punk on the Bus: contradictory information given
523:What did the aliens contact the whales even want?
1357:I believe I have addressed all the above issues.
1637:Nimoy claims authorship of the punk rocker scene
1368:Yes indeed, happy to pass -- well done! Cheers,
1811:
146:Can someone verify that the molecule is one of
1943:being used again until the premier episode of
1714:Why is the film itself not a reliable source?
910:I'm not sure what you mean by "commonality".
8:
1493:Where are these sources of which you speak?
1507:http://www.scifimoviepage.com/mar99pik.html
409:I am unable to make out the next comments.
2038:
1990:was something, by mid-1960s TV standards.
1511:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092007/trivia
1401:One popular shot in other media is of the
1126:
979:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT18OJEPU9Q
975:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn7qNOdyUSE
796:23 years after the release of Star Trek 4
1805:Correction of the Layla Sarakalo summary
330:I assure you, it's there. Go listen. :)
1157:
1129:
1651:2601:484:c201:565c:1016:16f1:1455:dc91
1195:Talk:Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home/GA1
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
1986:, "Let's get the hell out of here!"
1100:Otherwise a static shot of the probe
1840:indeed, any interpretation at all.
1233:Ok... thanks for the quick grab :P
493:I think they serve 'freedom fries'.
1856:The one with the whales listed at
109:Nevermind, I found it! From IMDB:
24:
18:Talk:Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home
1033:Battle for the Planet of the Apes
561:. And yes, it is in popular use.
29:
1983:The City on the Edge of Forever
1900:on YOU!" line was hilarious) -
1809:If you read the cite, it says
1421:Does anyone know if the movie
629:12:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
513:01:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
442:19:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
435:Hopefully I was of some help.
1:
2076:19:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1905:05:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1797:15:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
1785:12:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
1762:22:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
1736:16:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
1724:14:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
1706:21:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
1694:15:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
1632:18:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
1423:Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home
1411:19:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
1396:12:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
1027:14:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1018:13:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1003:13:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
991:00:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
963:15:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
946:17:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
936:16:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
924:13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
915:17:50, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
906:16:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
870:15:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
852:20:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
839:20:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
726:02:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
702:23:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
691:02:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
611:22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
601:18:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
590:05:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
487:02:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
391:15:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
377:09:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
280:20:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
254:I suppose you are correct :)
155:20:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
131:07:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
1460:22:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
1436:00:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
1378:23:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1364:14:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1352:02:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1263:02:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1240:02:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1228:01:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1214:01:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
644:00:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
453:20:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
2028:"Sounds like the goddamned
2017:06:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1118:16:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
977:Lord of the Rings titles -
666:06:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
539:18:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
528:18:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
359:23:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
349:04:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
335:03:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
318:03:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
308:03:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
298:02:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
290:verified in the subtitles.
2092:
1918:05:13, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
799:Who would have thunk it?
752:10:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
706:If you read Nimoy's book,
259:05:13, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
238:02:24, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
228:01:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
214:01:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
193:09:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
182:23:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
1995:02:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1976:01:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1966:01:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
1952:00:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
1890:22:10, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1793:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1732:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1702:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1674:16:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
1670:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1612:14:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1591:13:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1496:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1444:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1360:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1236:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1114:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1052:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
932:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
902:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
848:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
815:04:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
775:03:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
545:"The one with the whales"
473:14:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
90:03:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
2053:03:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
1874:. Please participate in
1858:Redirects for discussion
1850:20:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
1834:15:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
1556:11:26, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
1534:01:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
1500:17:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
1488:01:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
1070:14:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
568:04:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
1895:Swearing in the future?
1878:if you wish to do so.
1876:the redirect discussion
1872:The one with the whales
1566:Main article correction
1298:Who or what is "Rodis"?
1056:20:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
1045:18:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
619:the one with the whales
519:Aliens conacting Whales
419:17:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
396:
80:07:53, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
1867:
1821:
303:That it sounds bogus.
1933:Star Trek Generations
1866:
670:It was a mix. There
42:of past discussions.
784:Transparent Aluminum
736:The article states
2030:Spanish Inquisition
1949:User:24.168.150.118
1468:Probe Design (Rama)
1319:"Most shots of the
1276:Article dab links:
1008:even less direct.--
968:Soundtrack Citation
1939:." I don't recall
1868:
160:Trial? What trial?
2066:comment added by
2055:
2043:comment added by
1663:
1649:comment added by
1602:by an IP vandal.
1594:
1577:comment added by
1537:
1520:comment added by
1452:SaberToothedWhale
1417:Impact on Whaling
1286:The Long Way Home
1185:
1184:
805:comment added by
765:comment added by
716:comment added by
681:comment added by
592:
580:comment added by
515:
503:comment added by
397:Whalers' language
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2083:
2078:
1887:
1882:
1794:
1733:
1703:
1671:
1662:
1643:
1593:
1571:
1536:
1514:
1497:
1445:
1361:
1237:
1139:Copyvio detector
1127:
1115:
1053:
933:
903:
849:
817:
777:
749:The Fashion Icon
728:
693:
575:
525:Arthurian Legend
498:
364:Massive blanking
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2068:150.131.128.243
2061:
1897:
1885:
1880:
1861:
1807:
1792:
1731:
1701:
1682:
1669:
1644:
1639:
1620:
1579:Brianjcavanaugh
1572:
1568:
1515:
1495:
1470:
1443:
1428:150.203.110.172
1419:
1359:
1321:humpback whales
1235:
1189:This review is
1181:
1153:
1125:
1113:
1090:
1088:Non-free images
1051:
970:
931:
901:
860:
847:
827:Time After Time
823:
800:
786:
760:
734:
718:150.131.128.180
711:
683:150.131.128.180
676:
651:
649:Nuclear Wessels
549:Perhaps not an
547:
521:
461:
407:
399:
366:
287:
273:
179:205.188.116.195
162:
144:
98:Troy McClure SF
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2089:
2087:
2058:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1896:
1893:
1860:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1818:
1817:
1815:
1814:
1806:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1754:SonOfThornhill
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1716:SonOfThornhill
1709:
1708:
1686:SonOfThornhill
1681:
1680:Vijay Amritraj
1678:
1677:
1676:
1638:
1635:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1600:this edit here
1567:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1503:
1502:
1469:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1418:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1340:
1339:
1329:
1328:
1317:
1303:
1302:
1299:
1289:
1288:
1283:
1281:The Advertiser
1275:
1270:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1200:
1199:
1183:
1182:
1180:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1152:
1151:
1149:External links
1146:
1141:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1124:
1121:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1098:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
969:
966:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
917:
859:
856:
855:
854:
822:
819:
785:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
745:
744:
733:
730:
650:
647:
632:
631:
594:
593:
565:Andrew Rodland
546:
543:
542:
541:
520:
517:
505:134.117.158.83
495:
494:
490:
489:
476:
475:
460:
457:
456:
455:
423:
404:<clunk: -->
403:
398:
395:
394:
393:
365:
362:
352:
351:
321:
320:
310:
286:
283:
272:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
217:
216:
201:
200:
185:
184:
161:
158:
143:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
123:
122:
121:
120:
111:
110:
106:
105:
93:
92:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2088:
2079:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2056:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2035:
2031:
2018:
2015:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
1996:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1984:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1974:
1973:Defunctzombie
1969:
1968:
1967:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1919:
1916:
1911:
1907:
1906:
1903:
1894:
1892:
1891:
1888:
1883:
1877:
1873:
1865:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1826:Robert Walker
1820:
1810:
1804:
1798:
1795:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1773:
1772:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1737:
1734:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1679:
1675:
1672:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1636:
1634:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1604:Chaheel Riens
1601:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1565:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1548:Chaheel Riens
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1512:
1508:
1501:
1498:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1476:
1467:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1424:
1416:
1412:
1409:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1362:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1333:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1300:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1293:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1204:
1198:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1134:
1133:
1128:
1122:
1120:
1119:
1116:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1087:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
967:
965:
964:
961:
947:
944:
939:
938:
937:
934:
927:
926:
925:
922:
918:
916:
913:
909:
908:
907:
904:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
873:
872:
871:
868:
864:
857:
853:
850:
843:
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
828:
820:
818:
816:
812:
808:
807:70.75.177.174
804:
797:
794:
793:
789:
783:
776:
772:
768:
764:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
750:
743:
739:
738:
737:
731:
729:
727:
723:
719:
715:
709:
704:
703:
700:
694:
692:
688:
684:
680:
673:
668:
667:
664:
660:
655:
648:
646:
645:
641:
637:
630:
627:
624:
620:
615:
614:
613:
612:
609:
603:
602:
599:
591:
587:
583:
582:200.83.56.249
579:
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
562:
560:
556:
552:
544:
540:
537:
536:Steve, Sm8900
532:
531:
530:
529:
526:
518:
516:
514:
510:
506:
502:
492:
491:
488:
485:
481:
480:
479:
474:
471:
467:
466:
465:
458:
454:
451:
446:
445:
444:
443:
440:
439:85.225.27.109
436:
433:
429:
426:
421:
420:
417:
413:
410:
402:
392:
389:
386:
381:
380:
379:
378:
375:
371:
363:
361:
360:
357:
350:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
336:
333:
328:
324:
319:
316:
311:
309:
306:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
291:
284:
282:
281:
278:
277:129.74.161.50
270:
260:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
239:
236:
231:
230:
229:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
212:
207:
203:
202:
197:
196:
195:
194:
191:
183:
180:
175:
174:
173:
171:
165:
159:
157:
156:
153:
149:
141:
134:
133:
132:
129:
125:
124:
119:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
107:
102:
101:
100:
99:
91:
88:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2057:
2045:74.66.220.40
2039:— Preceding
2027:
1987:
1981:
1958:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1928:
1923:
1921:
1912:
1908:
1898:
1869:
1822:
1812:
1808:
1683:
1645:— Preceding
1640:
1621:
1573:— Preceding
1569:
1516:— Preceding
1504:
1474:
1471:
1422:
1420:
1402:
1384:
1341:
1331:
1330:
1325:scale models
1313:
1305:
1304:
1291:
1290:
1274:
1269:
1249:
1245:
1217:
1202:
1201:
1188:
1177:Instructions
1110:
1091:
1037:66.110.6.119
971:
956:
876:
863:Using popups
861:
826:
824:
798:
795:
790:
787:
746:
740:
735:
707:
705:
695:
671:
669:
658:
656:
652:
633:
608:WikiReaderer
604:
598:WikiReaderer
595:
563:
554:
550:
548:
522:
496:
477:
462:
437:
434:
430:
427:
422:
414:
411:
408:
400:
369:
368:Why was the
367:
353:
341:
329:
325:
322:
292:
288:
274:
205:
186:
169:
166:
163:
145:
116:
94:
73:
70:Pizza Parlor
60:
43:
37:
2062:—Preceding
1624:108.94.3.63
1250:Croc Dundee
1246:Voyage Home
1191:transcluded
858:Film poster
801:—Preceding
767:70.50.222.7
761:—Preceding
712:—Preceding
677:—Preceding
576:—Preceding
551:appropriate
499:—Preceding
36:This is an
1957:One thing
1945:Enterprise
1881:TheAwesome
1480:68.6.76.31
1144:Authorship
1130:GA toolbox
708:I Am Spock
356:Wilybadger
332:Wilybadger
295:Wilybadger
271:Continuity
2034:Radioflux
1992:Wahkeenah
1963:Wahkeenah
1959:Star Trek
1522:Jackbravo
1203:Reviewer:
1167:Templates
1158:Reviewing
1123:GA Review
1062:RedKnight
1010:RedKnight
983:RedKnight
742:theaters.
623:Fayenatic
484:Wahkeenah
470:Wahkeenah
459:leningrad
385:Mackensen
346:Wahkeenah
315:Wahkeenah
305:Wahkeenah
61:Archive 1
2064:unsigned
2041:unsigned
1915:WookMuff
1842:Ca2james
1659:contribs
1647:unsigned
1587:contribs
1575:unsigned
1530:contribs
1518:unsigned
1388:Remurmur
1370:Ian Rose
1344:Ian Rose
1342:Cheers,
1255:Ian Rose
1220:Ian Rose
1206:Ian Rose
1172:Criteria
803:unsigned
763:unsigned
714:unsigned
679:unsigned
663:Vercalos
636:Tombrend
578:unsigned
501:unsigned
450:TheHande
256:WookMuff
225:WookMuff
190:WookMuff
1902:Kasreyn
1618:Portals
1332:Release
1306:Effects
899:do so.
831:Jock123
555:amusing
416:Edgjerp
374:Husnock
235:Kasreyn
211:Kasreyn
128:Kasreyn
87:Husnock
77:Husnock
39:archive
2014:CFLeon
1777:Ns kid
1408:Powers
1403:Bounty
1292:Design
1024:Powers
1000:Powers
960:Powers
943:Powers
921:Powers
912:Powers
895:, and
867:Powers
626:(talk)
388:(talk)
370:entire
285:Trivia
152:DBBell
1323:were
1193:from
1104:less.
557:one:
342:there
340:It's
170:after
148:Lexan
142:Lexan
16:<
2072:talk
2049:talk
1988:that
1937:shit
1929:shit
1924:shit
1886:Hwyh
1846:talk
1830:talk
1781:talk
1758:talk
1720:talk
1690:talk
1655:talk
1628:talk
1608:talk
1583:talk
1552:talk
1526:talk
1509:and
1484:talk
1456:talk
1432:talk
1392:talk
1374:talk
1348:talk
1259:talk
1248:and
1224:talk
1210:talk
1066:talk
1041:talk
1014:talk
987:talk
897:VIII
835:talk
811:talk
771:talk
722:talk
687:talk
672:were
640:talk
586:talk
509:talk
497:-G
206:need
1941:ass
1314:how
889:III
877:art
732:TNG
659:all
2074:)
2051:)
1848:)
1832:)
1783:)
1760:)
1722:)
1692:)
1661:)
1657:•
1630:)
1610:)
1589:)
1585:•
1554:)
1532:)
1528:•
1486:)
1458:)
1434:)
1394:)
1376:)
1350:)
1334::
1308::
1294::
1261:)
1226:)
1212:)
1111:--
1068:)
1043:)
1016:)
989:)
981:--
893:VI
891:,
887:,
885:II
883:,
837:)
813:)
773:)
724:)
699:IP
689:)
642:)
588:)
534:--
511:)
150:?
2070:(
2047:(
1844:(
1828:(
1779:(
1756:(
1718:(
1688:(
1653:(
1626:(
1606:(
1581:(
1550:(
1524:(
1482:(
1454:(
1430:(
1390:(
1372:(
1346:(
1257:(
1222:(
1208:(
1064:(
1039:(
1012:(
985:(
881:I
833:(
809:(
769:(
720:(
685:(
638:(
584:(
507:(
126:-
96:-
75:-
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.