Knowledge

Talk:Symbian/Archive 2

Source đź“ť

951:
and use the UI with mouse cursor). The UI controls were not designed for proper touch UI and multitouch support - these are just PC-style controls which are usable with mouse, keyboard or pen. There's no system support for gestures, at all - the only thing the developers can do is to roll their own. Support for touch text input was also added as a quick hack - at first it was fullscreen, then they added proper non-fullscreen keyboard, which requires the application to know that it wants to support non-full screen keyboard ... Existing applications are not aware of multitouch. Symbian^3 is just more layers added on top of the legacy code. Debugging tools DON't exist or can be barely qualified as debugging helpers. There's no support for developers to get application stack trace - when panic occurs, you're screwed. When "debugger" is lucky enough to catch the KERN-EXEC 3 before system kills the application, I haven't seen any stack trace even one time (just some assembly code, probably in ROM). Hell, Nokia even screwed GDB in N9. The "debugger" crashes either the phone or (if you're lucky) only itself, when the application crashes, or it may happen randomly. You can barely singlestep during the "debugging" session, the "debugger" will usually skip some code, continue with "full" execution or just plainly crash. Breakpoints don't work most of the time. Capabilities are joke - they create annoying capability matching problems between DLLs, yet knowledgeable developer can crash the phone with providing incorrect arguments to system services (even by accident). Most APIs are buggy, incomplete and don't behave consistently on different phone and firmware models. It's just a tip of the iceberg.
428:, since these two entities are no longer responsible for the development of the platform. Moving to Symbian Ltd. would be a pure anachronism, since they were not actually responsible for Symbian^1 release which was made through Symbian Foundation, and the Foundation is a bad choice too because it was recently reduced to a bunch of accontants performing "licensing activities" (and when it wasn't, their activity mostly consisted of making numerious 2086: 31: 1527: 1239: 1156: 1074: 992: 777:"In 2009-2010, Motorola, Samsung, LG, and Sony Ericsson announced their withdrawal from the platform, leaving only Nokia and several small Japanese-only vendors. By the end of 2010, Samsung will totally leave Symbian including the support and service and also remove all content relating to Symbian from its website, whereas Sony Ericsson will not introduce new mobile phone with Symbian." 652:. You see, I was confused about the articles and about the contributors that might view my actions as unnecessary or reckless or think I'm a vandal. So I decided to write up what I did and why, and state how I rewrote it to fit together and that it wasn't mindlessly done. Makes sense? I hope that ends all confusion. -- 1604:
I came here to fin some basic facts on Symbian, specifically the history of 2007-08 and ... I was sure that they were "here" last time I looked, but now there seems to be at least this one gaping hole: the dates in the Symbian version history are incomplete, with the most crucial one,. the release of
950:
Don't even get me started on Symbian. I have almost 6 years experience with Symbian app development. Touch UI support in Symbian is a joke and just a quick hack - old AVKON/EIKON slapped together with mouse event emulation, which was there for a long time (that's why you can connect mouse to Nokia N8
117:
I agree with Stichbury and disagree with Bpringlemeir. The article states "Symbian^1, as the first release, forms the basis for the platform. It incorporates Symbian OS and S60 5th Edition (which is built on Symbian OS 9.4) and thus it was not made available as open source." It incorporates but it is
1700:
When Steve Jobs, bragged about the iPhone having 'facetime' this was non-sense. The SonyEricson P990i had a front facing camera and I had been using 3G video-dialing well ahead. Even with the iPhone, you could n't use the network, you had to be on Wireless to use video calling. (this feature may be
1692:
It is a shame, that this phone was beaten firstly by Apple and then Android phones. If SonyEricson, had continued development of the P990i, there may well have been a challenger to the iPhone and Android. The P990i, did not have a centralised App marketplace (which was a strength of Apple iPhone and
417:
numbered releases like Symbian^1 aka S60 5th Edition, which is largely synonymous with Symbian now, its latest reincarnation Symbian^3, and its updates that should make up the cancelled Symbian^4 release. So feel free to add more information about actual shortcomings in the current numbered versions.
966:
This is all specialized, inside knowledge but if you have some reputable sources for it then at least some of it can be added. From an outsider perspective relating to what you wrote, it is clear that Symbian OS development went slow when compared to e.g. Android or iOS. And also that growth of the
1608:
Yes it's good to try and get alignment of titles and content but the most important thing is to arrange the available data so that it is easy to search and that means going from the general to the specific smoothly. It really is irrelevant if there are many articles, the key is their relationship
890:
have (UIQ, S60 5th, S^3, etc.) couldn't (or can't) match the touchscreen UI experience on iOS and Android, which appears to be responsible for the decline of Symbian's market share. This is something always peripherally insinuated and suggested in device reviews and editorials on tech sites and in
730:
I think that All about Symbian is one of the best sources on Symbian, though it has clearly a pro-Symbian bias, but if even they find the web browser wanting after a thorough comparison then it can be safely stated as such. Also, there were some other website that referred to the test by All about
1616:
Sorry, I know everyone's been working hard on it, but this article needs splitting not more mergeing and that's just the way it is. If we go on like this we'll end up with one mountain of an article simple headed Mobile Technology!! Merges SEEM like a logical thing but this article demonstrates
643:
I was only trying to keep things simple since there was so much confusion regarding the Symbian articles. Plus, I was the only one who took the initiative (read: bold) to merge the articles and I therefore assumed I'd get a lot of backlash from others who didn't approve. Luckily the whole process
416:
This section needs to explain the legacy of Symbian platform which resulted in its current poor ratings, that's why it needs some historical details of bad design decisions and why did they happen; however it's focus on the events of the past is not intended. It should actually talk about current
98:
I think a new page that describes the Symbian platform in its state as an open source platform is acceptable and propose to start one by repopulating the page here. The page should be restricted to discussion of the new Symbian platform and not contain information about past releases, devices or
1612:
It helps nobody to have an article which attempts to cover intricate and arcane detail at the same time as giving the broad overview. Sadly this article seems to do just that, missing critical dates off the timeline while giving a mass of impenetrable technical detail all wrapped up in a vast,
848:
It seems to be accepted that the main reason for Symbian's sharp market share loss since the introduction of the iPhone and Android was the failure of the platform's OEMs and/or contributors (read: Nokia) to create a Symbian user interface as similarly optimized for touch interaction as these
308:
is dead but still should there not be a reference to properly describe the history of Symbian? Or alternatively rephrase ”Since its creation Symbian“ to make it clear that the beginning of Symbian platform is meant (and therefore imply that Symbian OS might have had different choices if UI).
1265:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. 1100:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. 1018:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. 1685:
Sony Ericson developed the P800, P910 and then the P990i. All were Symbian based. The phones were ahead of their times. They ran Symbian and the clever thing was that they were touchscreen (operated by a stylus), with both a numeric keypad and a full QWERTY keyboard.
1326:! Who thought up that name as it sounds like a sex toy that has been around since the 1980s. I wonder how many people are going to feel comfortable with a sy(m)bian (sic)? In English pronunciation there is little difference between the two due to the soft em sound. 155:
has several packages added. However, just because Microsoft bundles IE with an OS release didn't give it a new page. Also, by having separate pages some of the history is missing. History is often important to readers of an Encyclopedia.
330:). Again I think this page only exist to ”beautify” Nokia's mistakes in (A) underestimating the importance of touch screens and (B) the choice of upgrading the non-touchscreen GUI “S60” over the already touch screen GUI “UIQ” (in a case of 90:
I believe it's time to start a Symbian platform page again. This page existed previously and was folded into the general Symbian OS page on the basis that they were much the same thing, and separation could be seen as a marketing ploy.
326:“touchscreens were practically nonexistent” is not true either. The “nonexistent” only applies for Nokia. Other companies had touch screen phones. For example Sony Ericsson had Symbian/UIQ based touch screen phones since 2002 ( 1693:
then later Android phones). Also, if they changed the screen from a stylus operated to finger touchscreen it would have been a step forward (although it was possible to use your finger, it was nevertheless delicate screen).
432:, while the actual code has been approved and contributed by Nokia alone due to their ultimate control of development teams for both Series 60 and Symbian OS). So this place is only logical to talk about current events. -- 94:
Now that Symbian is a fully open source platform it is a different entity to the previous incarnation (Symbian OS plus UI platform) and explaining that clearly on a single page is becoming more and more convoluted.
697:
They removed a paragraph about declining market share. Yes, market share is covered in the previous paragraph, but with the exact opposite POV. This content should be incorporated into the Competition section.
1707:
This is a failure on Sony, not to develop this phone further and match it when the Apple iPhone came out. Sony was wowed by the iPhone user interface, they forget they had stopped development on the P990i.
1696:
When I say the phone was ahead of its 'time' - let me explain - it was a time when people carried iPods (for music) and classic phones (for phone calls). The P800 (and later series) was everything in one.
1553:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 886:
Fair point, but I wasn't attempting to say that Symbian is in decline because it wasn't the first to have touch interaction. What I wanted to add to the article was that the touch interfaces that it
540:
I hope everything looks fine from a user and a developer perspective. I have worked with the platform myself so I restructured and did the merge based on what I understand of the Symbian OS.
1990: 1942: 1436: 700:"Old" criticism can be published in an encyclopedia. Include the date, or applicable version, if the source mentions it, and let the reader decide for her/himself. 2028: 2024: 2010: 1820: 1816: 1802: 905:
s60 5th edition received bad reviews for its (resistive) mono-touchscreen UI (i.e. non-multitouchscreen). This can be stated with plenty of sources, I think.
1960: 269:
landing page from “redirect” to “disambiguation”. I made the same mistake on first seeing the page. And I know Symbian and the history fairly well. --
1991:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120630220551/http://www.thesmartpda.com/50226711/six_years_of_symbian_produces_100_models_and_100_million_shipments.php
1932: 715:
The criticism section should cover criticism published in reliable sources. I swapped in a ZDnet link for a blog post and I'm sure there's more. --
1922: 1902: 393:
Most of the criticism does not address the performance of the platform/OS but the internal workings of the organization. So it belongs at either
1704:
I must admit, I still miss the P990i. It is a fantastic phone (both in physical design, clever flip out keypads) and clever in using the phone.
1636:
exists. I have to agree that these articles are not very coherent and the history of symbian article was originally not even a history article.
849:
plaftorms, and I believe this should be added to the Criticism section; however, good, reliable sources that can verify this appear to be rare.
429: 1768: 1656:"The current form of Symbian is an open-source platform developed by Symbian Foundation in 2009, as the successor of the original Symbian OS." 1994: 1943:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121124100409/http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/english/binary/pdf/support/trouble/manual/download/f07b/F-07B_E_All.pdf
1456:
the open source Symbian should stay here, the new closed source Symbian became Nokia OS, so Symbian still exists, as an open source system.
1485: 1333: 1291: 1245: 1666: 1457: 931: 758: 118:
not Symbian OS. Also all the planned releases have nothing to do with the old Symbian OS. The page could use a bit of cleanup though.
2000: 952: 488:
I also think the internal workings of the Symbian foundation and Symbian Ltd are not very relevant. Consumers look at the peformance.
192: 177: 125: 1946: 1080: 2006:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1719: 784:(has been shut down now), on 6 November 2010, and if you selected year 2010 only devices from Nokia, Sharp and Fujitsu were listed. 191:
There certainly is a Windows 7 page, along with pages for most major releases of Windows, and for each major release of Mac OS X. --
1974: 1586: 1304: 1216: 1133: 1051: 1163: 998: 711:. Is the writer an expert who's been published in reliable publications? Is there evidence this blog is a reliable publication? 1758: 352:
Now that Symbian website will be shut down, referenced articles will need to be archived with Web Cite or Internet Archive. --
442: 362: 1573: 1533: 278:
I made the same mistake too. Thanks for the disambig, but I do not think it is enough. I re-propose to merge the articles.
1961:
http://library.forum.nokia.com/index.jsp?topic=%2FWeb_Developers_Library%2FGUID-B7D6EFF3-16E6-45D5-9B74-8333BA83FC7B.html
2071: 1912: 704: 1511:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1365:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1582: 1300: 1212: 1129: 1047: 452:
I see your point. The root cause is the very poorly organized set of articles on Symbian. The main article should be
147:
pages. I guess the major problem is in the naming. This is like someone making a Linux distribution and calling it
2093: 331: 38: 1933:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100827014806/http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/05/31/qt-simulator-is-going-public
1980: 2027:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1819:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1923:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100626044119/http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/06/23/nokia-qt-sdk-10-released/
1489: 1440: 1903:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131111024336/http://www.watblog.com/2010/02/06/symbian-os-now-fully-open-source/
1337: 1670: 762: 2062: 1888: 1769:
http://web.archive.org/web/20111211010401/http://www.symbianblogs.com:80/history/110-symbian-2--history.html
1750: 1461: 1401: 956: 222: 196: 1936: 139:
Can anyone find a similar situation where an OS version has been given a particular page? Ie, there is no
2114: 1995:
http://www.thesmartpda.com/50226711/six_years_of_symbian_produces_100_models_and_100_million_shipments.php
1622: 1572:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1290:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1198:
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
474:
workings of Symbian LTD and Symbian platform. Just one unconfirmed supposedly inside story is not enough.
217:
If anyone has some screenshots of Symbian running, they could greatly add to the content of the article.
181: 161: 129: 108: 59: 2046:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2034: 1858: 1838:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1826: 1723: 218: 1926: 1887:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1749:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 170:
I think you can compare it with Debian and Ubuntu. One is based on another and both have a wiki page.
1417:
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
1184:
before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
1906: 1793: 1715: 1662: 1329: 932:
http://allthingsd.com/20110601/after-a-rough-couple-of-days-nokias-stephen-elop-live-at-d9/?refcat=d9
754: 256: 241: 173: 121: 2001:
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Hacker-plants-back-door-in-Symbian-firmware-1149926.html
799: 83: 1947:
http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/english/binary/pdf/support/trouble/manual/download/f07b/F-07B_E_All.pdf
1772: 236:
there are a bunch of other devices running Symbian that were released before those in the list. --
1968: 1954: 1633: 1397: 1379: 864:
Yes, there is some truth in it, but touch for symbian preceded iPhone and Android in the form of
789: 534: 438: 421: 398: 358: 327: 2031:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1823:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2047: 1839: 1975:
http://webhost.bridgew.edu/jsantore/Teaching-Archive/Fall2010/MobileDev/SYMBIAN_MDD_sennur.pdf
1641: 1618: 1537: 1393: 1249: 1084: 1002: 972: 938: 910: 873: 834: 807: 780:
I'm not sure if it counts for anything, but I visited the symbian foundation page on devices,
736: 653: 601: 544: 493: 479: 461: 406: 378: 283: 157: 104: 1896: 1854: 896: 854: 645: 578: 529: 2054: 1846: 1759:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100816010641/http://qt.nokia.com:80/products/platform/symbian/
553:
I'm super-confused about the talk pages. Would you explain where they ended up, and why? --
252: 237: 617:
I requested that move. Yet, I don't understand why you keep announcing the moves here. --
2013:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1805:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1558: 1270: 1189: 1105: 1023: 622: 79: 2053:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1845:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1913:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120118163456/http://www.developer.nokia.com/Develop/Qt/
1565: 1484:
There is already an article called Nokia OS. What should be done with that content?--
1375: 1277: 1202: 1193: 1181: 1112: 1030: 785: 720: 708: 668: 558: 433: 353: 339: 313: 270: 1609:
with one another and that the degree of granularity remains consistent within each.
2102: 1637: 1502: 1356: 968: 934: 927: 906: 869: 830: 803: 732: 489: 475: 457: 456:. I have only very limited time to re-organize the many symbian related articles. 425: 402: 394: 374: 279: 47: 17: 1762: 2101:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2020: 1812: 1712:
I preferred the P990 ahead of the Nokia range of Symbian based smartphones....
892: 850: 572: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1984: 1284: 1119: 1037: 2019:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1981:
https://archive.is/20130203165131/http://www.symbianone.com/content/view/7108/
1811:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1526: 1238: 1155: 1073: 991: 519: 1561:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1273:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1108:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1026:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1701:
available on older P800 or P910... I can't remember, but the P990i was 3G).
1579:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
1297:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
618: 2076: 1866: 1727: 1674: 1645: 1626: 1590: 1493: 1465: 1405: 1383: 1341: 1308: 1220: 1137: 1055: 976: 960: 942: 914: 900: 877: 858: 838: 811: 793: 766: 740: 724: 672: 656: 626: 604: 562: 547: 497: 483: 465: 447: 410: 382: 367: 342: 316: 287: 273: 260: 245: 226: 200: 185: 165: 133: 112: 87: 99:
commercial successes (built on Symbian OS, Symbian Software Ltd etc etc).
1916: 826: 751:
Series 60 3rd edition Feature Pack 2 models DO have Wi-Fi capabilities!
716: 664: 554: 1937:
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/05/31/qt-simulator-is-going-public/
1396:– Nokia already change the name of Symbian to Nokia OS(e.g. Nokia Belle 1147:
File:Nokia N8 Symbian Belle Screenshot.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
663:
How about the related talk page moves? Those moves confuse me, a lot. --
1880: 1742: 1389: 1180:; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review 930:
called Symbian/S60 crufty and slow to improve. Read the interview here
649: 588: 514: 453: 266: 1323: 1927:
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/06/23/nokia-qt-sdk-10-released/
1168:
Knowledge files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 January 2012
1166:, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: 1907:
http://www.watblog.com/2010/02/06/symbian-os-now-fully-open-source
825:
The article needs an update for Symbian Anna and new models, like
773:
Competition and alternatives. Device manufacturers pullout sources
1230:
File:SymbianBelle-ScreenShotsES.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
781: 510:
I'm the one responsible for the merging of the following pages:
1773:
http://www.symbianblogs.com/history/110-symbian-2--history.html
1065:
File:Symbian Belle Screenshot.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
470:
I do not agree with the amount and quality of sourcing for the
2080: 865: 305: 298: 25: 1778:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
983:
File:Symbian Anna Snapshot.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
644:
went smoothly and someone even did the last bit by renaming
891:
magazines, but never clearly enough to be used as sources.
1897:
http://blog.symbian.org/2009/04/16/symbian-on-intels-atom/
1891:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1753:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1283:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
1201:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
1118:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
1036:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
103:
I disagree completely. The user below is also confused.
1355:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
1884: 1746: 1681:
P990i - exception Symbian based phone ahead of its time
693:
to the Criticism section concern me for three reasons:
689: 1689:
It is without doubt the best phone I have ever used!!
1501:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
338:
on the basis that this page is company propaganda. --
543:
Comments and everything accepted. Thank you, Tom --
2023:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1815:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1564:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 1518:
File:Nokia N8 Smartphone.jpg Nominated for Deletion
1439:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 1276:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 1111:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 1029:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 420:However I don't think this part should be moved to 232:the devices list only has some more recent devices 1292:image page (File:SymbianBelle-ScreenShotsES.png) 265:to prevent such misunderstanding I changed the 2009:This message was posted before February 2018. 1801:This message was posted before February 2018. 1763:http://qt.nokia.com/products/platform/symbian/ 334:). If the vote comes up again my vote will be 251:oops, aparently it's no the same Symbian... -- 8: 1985:http://www.symbianone.com/content/view/7108/ 1248:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 1083:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 1001:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 1437:polling is not a substitute for discussion 1318:Marketing name...I nearly fell of my chair 1164:File:Nokia N8 Symbian Belle Screenshot.jpg 1879:I have just modified 9 external links on 1741:I have just modified 2 external links on 1574:image page (File:Nokia N8 Smartphone.jpg) 322:touchscreens were practically nonexistent 1617:that it often isn't as simple as that. 1613:rambling and barely coherent article. 2099:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1917:http://developer.nokia.com/Develop/Qt/ 1209:This notification is provided by a Bot 1126:This notification is provided by a Bot 1044:This notification is provided by a Bot 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1790:to let others know (documentation at 1536:, has been nominated for deletion at 7: 1441:Knowledge's policy on article titles 1370:The result of the move request was: 1568:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 1322:Classic Nokia...sounds almost like 1280:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 1246:File:SymbianBelle-ScreenShotsES.png 1115:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 1033:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 506:Recent merge into Symbian platform 24: 1883:. Please take a moment to review 1745:. Please take a moment to review 1081:File:Symbian Belle Screenshot.jpg 967:number of applications was slow. 2084: 1525: 1237: 1154: 1072: 990: 29: 1999:Corrected formatting/usage for 1895:Corrected formatting/usage for 1532:An image used in this article, 1244:An image used in this article, 1192:then you may need to provide a 1162:An image used in this article, 1079:An image used in this article, 997:An image used in this article, 373:Some will move to forum Nokia. 2077:19:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC) 1600:Request to SPLIT this article. 999:File:Symbian Anna Snapshot.png 915:10:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC) 901:09:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC) 878:11:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC) 859:08:25, 12 September 2011 (UTC) 782:http://www.symbian.org/devices 389:Off topic contents: criticisms 1: 1429:, then sign your comment with 1342:17:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 1309:15:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 943:09:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC) 683:Criticism in reliable sources 627:14:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 605:14:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 563:06:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 548:11:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 88:16:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 1542:Deletion requests April 2012 1534:File:Nokia N8 Smartphone.jpg 1221:15:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 1138:14:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 767:02:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 498:17:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 484:15:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 466:13:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC) 448:20:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 411:19:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 383:09:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC) 368:20:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 1540:in the following category: 1056:18:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 977:20:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC) 961:20:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC) 741:20:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 725:03:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 673:01:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 657:19:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 2140: 2040:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1876:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1867:06:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 1832:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1738:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1591:02:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 1494:20:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC) 1466:06:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 1406:18:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC) 1384:12:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1285:Commons Undeletion Request 1252:for the following reason: 1120:Commons Undeletion Request 1087:for the following reason: 1038:Commons Undeletion Request 1005:for the following reason: 868:. I dunno why UIQ failed. 525:Into the following pages: 227:14:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 201:02:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 839:07:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 812:20:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC) 794:01:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC) 575:further moved this page: 343:05:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 317:07:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 288:08:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 274:05:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 1728:11:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 1508:Please do not modify it. 1478:Any additional comments: 1362:Please do not modify it. 261:04:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 246:04:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 186:09:51, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 166:13:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC) 134:21:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC) 113:00:59, 26 May 2010 (UTC) 1872:External links modified 1734:External links modified 1675:21:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 1646:16:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC) 1627:20:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 844:Criticism not extensive 1659:Someone update this. 1583:CommonsNotificationBot 1301:CommonsNotificationBot 1213:CommonsNotificationBot 1130:CommonsNotificationBot 1089:Other speedy deletions 1048:CommonsNotificationBot 2097:of past discussions. 42:of past discussions. 2021:regular verification 1813:regular verification 1254:Copyright violations 1007:Copyright violations 348:symbian.org shutdown 2011:After February 2018 1803:After February 2018 1782:parameter below to 1182:deletion guidelines 800:Sony Ericsson Vivaz 690:recent set of edits 2065:InternetArchiveBot 2016:InternetArchiveBot 1808:InternetArchiveBot 1634:history of Symbian 1566:fair use rationale 1278:fair use rationale 1194:fair use rationale 1113:fair use rationale 1031:fair use rationale 535:History of Symbian 422:Symbian Foundation 399:Symbian Foundation 328:Sony_Ericsson_P800 151:. I get that the 2127: 2126: 2109: 2108: 2103:current talk page 2041: 1865: 1833: 1718:comment added by 1665:comment added by 1597: 1596: 1546:What should I do? 1538:Wikimedia Commons 1332:comment added by 1315: 1314: 1258:What should I do? 1250:Wikimedia Commons 1227: 1226: 1173:What should I do? 1144: 1143: 1093:What should I do? 1085:Wikimedia Commons 1062: 1061: 1011:What should I do? 1003:Wikimedia Commons 757:comment added by 703:I question using 430:design committees 332:Not Invented Here 176:comment added by 124:comment added by 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2131: 2123: 2111: 2110: 2088: 2087: 2081: 2075: 2066: 2039: 2038: 2017: 1972: 1958: 1861: 1860:Talk to my owner 1856: 1831: 1830: 1809: 1797: 1730: 1677: 1557:If the image is 1529: 1522: 1521: 1510: 1433: 1427: 1421: 1364: 1344: 1269:If the image is 1241: 1234: 1233: 1188:If the image is 1158: 1151: 1150: 1104:If the image is 1076: 1069: 1068: 1022:If the image is 994: 987: 986: 769: 692: 646:Symbian platform 579:Symbian platform 530:Symbian platform 401:, but not here. 188: 136: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2119: 2085: 2069: 2064: 2032: 2025:have permission 2015: 1966: 1952: 1889:this simple FaQ 1874: 1864: 1859: 1824: 1817:have permission 1807: 1791: 1751:this simple FaQ 1736: 1713: 1683: 1660: 1654: 1602: 1520: 1515: 1506: 1474: 1431: 1425: 1419: 1413: 1360: 1350: 1327: 1320: 1232: 1203:Deletion Review 1149: 1067: 985: 846: 823: 775: 752: 749: 709:reliable source 688: 685: 508: 446: 391: 366: 350: 324: 302: 234: 215: 171: 119: 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2137: 2135: 2125: 2124: 2117: 2107: 2106: 2089: 2059: 2058: 2051: 2004: 2003: 1997: 1989:Added archive 1987: 1979:Added archive 1977: 1963: 1949: 1941:Added archive 1939: 1931:Added archive 1929: 1921:Added archive 1919: 1911:Added archive 1909: 1901:Added archive 1899: 1873: 1870: 1857: 1851: 1850: 1843: 1776: 1775: 1767:Added archive 1765: 1757:Added archive 1735: 1732: 1711: 1682: 1679: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1605:^3 missing.. 1601: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1570: 1569: 1562: 1548: 1547: 1530: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1513: 1503:requested move 1497: 1496: 1486:174.93.169.157 1481: 1480: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1446: 1445: 1420:*'''Support''' 1412: 1409: 1387: 1368: 1367: 1357:requested move 1351: 1349: 1348:Requested move 1346: 1334:109.156.27.217 1319: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1288: 1287: 1281: 1274: 1260: 1259: 1242: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1206: 1205: 1199: 1196: 1175: 1174: 1159: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1123: 1122: 1116: 1109: 1095: 1094: 1077: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1041: 1040: 1034: 1027: 1013: 1012: 995: 984: 981: 980: 979: 948: 947: 946: 945: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 881: 880: 845: 842: 822: 819: 817: 815: 814: 802:is from 2010. 774: 771: 748: 745: 744: 743: 713: 712: 705:this blog post 701: 698: 684: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 661: 660: 659: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 610: 609: 608: 607: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 585:To this page: 583: 582: 581: 566: 565: 538: 537: 532: 523: 522: 517: 507: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 486: 468: 436: 418: 390: 387: 386: 385: 356: 349: 346: 323: 320: 301: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 233: 230: 214: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 189: 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2136: 2122: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2090: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2056: 2052: 2049: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2036: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2012: 2007: 2002: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1976: 1970: 1964: 1962: 1956: 1950: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1877: 1871: 1869: 1868: 1862: 1855: 1848: 1844: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1828: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1804: 1799: 1795: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1733: 1731: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1709: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1680: 1678: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1667:87.202.34.103 1664: 1657: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1567: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1552: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1528: 1524: 1523: 1517: 1512: 1509: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1458:70.24.248.211 1455: 1451: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1426:*'''Oppose''' 1424: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398:Asiaworldcity 1395: 1391: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1352: 1347: 1345: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1325: 1317: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1286: 1282: 1279: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1264: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1235: 1229: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1146: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1099: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1064: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 993: 989: 988: 982: 978: 974: 970: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 954: 944: 940: 936: 933: 929: 926: 925: 924: 923: 916: 912: 908: 904: 903: 902: 898: 894: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 862: 861: 860: 856: 852: 843: 841: 840: 836: 832: 828: 820: 818: 813: 809: 805: 801: 798: 797: 796: 795: 791: 787: 783: 778: 772: 770: 768: 764: 760: 759:89.180.219.59 756: 746: 742: 738: 734: 729: 728: 727: 726: 722: 718: 710: 706: 702: 699: 696: 695: 694: 691: 682: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 655: 651: 647: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 628: 624: 620: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 606: 603: 600: 599: 598: 597: 590: 587: 586: 584: 580: 577: 576: 574: 571:I found that 570: 569: 568: 567: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551: 550: 549: 546: 541: 536: 533: 531: 528: 527: 526: 521: 518: 516: 513: 512: 511: 505: 499: 495: 491: 487: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 449: 444: 440: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 414: 413: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 371: 370: 369: 364: 360: 355: 347: 345: 344: 341: 337: 333: 329: 321: 319: 318: 315: 310: 307: 300: 297: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 272: 268: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 231: 229: 228: 224: 220: 219:SaiferPhoenix 212: 202: 198: 194: 190: 187: 183: 179: 175: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 137: 135: 131: 127: 123: 116: 115: 114: 110: 106: 102: 101: 100: 96: 92: 89: 85: 81: 74: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2120: 2098: 2092: 2063: 2060: 2035:source check 2014: 2008: 2005: 1878: 1875: 1852: 1827:source check 1806: 1800: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1777: 1740: 1737: 1714:— Preceding 1710: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1661:— Preceding 1658: 1655: 1632:The article 1619:LookingGlass 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1578: 1577: 1571: 1550: 1549: 1541: 1507: 1500: 1477: 1453: 1449: 1434: 1428: 1422: 1416: 1388: 1371: 1369: 1361: 1354: 1328:— Preceding 1321: 1296: 1295: 1289: 1262: 1261: 1253: 1208: 1207: 1177: 1176: 1167: 1161: 1125: 1124: 1097: 1096: 1088: 1043: 1042: 1015: 1014: 1006: 953:89.67.144.21 949: 928:Stephen Elop 887: 847: 824: 821:Needs update 816: 779: 776: 750: 714: 686: 542: 539: 524: 509: 471: 426:Symbian Ltd. 395:Symbian Ltd. 392: 351: 335: 325: 311: 304:I know that 303: 235: 216: 213:screenshots? 193:210.84.59.38 178:81.181.70.18 158:Bpringlemeir 152: 148: 145:Debian Lenny 144: 140: 126:81.181.70.18 105:Bpringlemeir 97: 93: 78: 65: 43: 37: 18:Talk:Symbian 2091:This is an 1794:Sourcecheck 1720:92.25.19.47 1551:Don't panic 1263:Don't panic 1178:Don't panic 1098:Don't panic 1016:Don't panic 753:—Preceding 654:Tom Jenkins 602:Tom Jenkins 573:User:BD2412 545:Tom Jenkins 172:—Preceding 120:—Preceding 36:This is an 2072:Report bug 1472:Discussion 520:Symbian OS 253:TiagoTiago 238:TiagoTiago 2121:Archive 2 2115:Archive 1 2055:this tool 2048:this tool 1969:dead link 1955:dead link 1847:this tool 1840:this tool 1372:not moved 731:Symbian. 141:Windows 7 80:Stichbury 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2061:Cheers.— 1853:Cheers.— 1716:unsigned 1663:unsigned 1559:non-free 1435:. Since 1394:Nokia OS 1376:JHunterJ 1330:unsigned 1271:non-free 1190:non-free 1106:non-free 1024:non-free 827:Nokia X7 786:Yosh3000 755:unsigned 472:internal 340:Krischik 314:Krischik 271:Krischik 174:unsigned 153:platform 122:unsigned 2094:archive 1973:tag to 1959:tag to 1885:my edit 1881:Symbian 1863::Online 1780:checked 1747:my edit 1743:Symbian 1638:Andries 1390:Symbian 969:Andries 935:Andries 907:Andries 870:Andries 831:Andries 804:Andries 733:Andries 650:Symbian 589:Symbian 515:Symbian 490:Andries 476:Andries 458:Andries 454:Symbian 443:contibs 403:Andries 375:Andries 363:contibs 280:Andries 267:Symbian 149:Linux 3 39:archive 1965:Added 1951:Added 1788:failed 1450:Oppose 1411:Survey 1324:sybian 893:Capdor 851:Capdor 434:Dmitry 354:Dmitry 1454:Split 747:Wi-Fi 707:as a 336:merge 16:< 1784:true 1724:talk 1671:talk 1652:Huh? 1642:talk 1623:talk 1587:talk 1490:talk 1462:talk 1432:~~~~ 1402:talk 1380:talk 1374:-- 1338:talk 1305:talk 1217:talk 1134:talk 1052:talk 973:talk 957:talk 939:talk 911:talk 897:talk 888:does 874:talk 855:talk 835:talk 808:talk 790:talk 763:talk 737:talk 721:talk 687:The 669:talk 623:talk 619:uKER 559:talk 494:talk 480:talk 462:talk 439:talk 407:talk 379:talk 359:talk 284:talk 257:talk 242:talk 223:talk 197:talk 182:talk 162:talk 130:talk 109:talk 84:talk 75:Page 2029:RfC 1993:to 1983:to 1945:to 1935:to 1925:to 1915:to 1905:to 1821:RfC 1798:). 1786:or 1771:to 1761:to 1505:. 866:UIQ 717:Pnm 665:Pnm 648:to 555:Pnm 424:or 397:or 306:UIQ 299:UIQ 143:or 2042:. 2037:}} 2033:{{ 1971:}} 1967:{{ 1957:}} 1953:{{ 1834:. 1829:}} 1825:{{ 1796:}} 1792:{{ 1726:) 1673:) 1644:) 1625:) 1589:) 1581:-- 1492:) 1464:) 1452:, 1423:or 1404:) 1392:→ 1382:) 1359:. 1340:) 1307:) 1299:-- 1219:) 1211:-- 1136:) 1128:-- 1054:) 1046:-- 975:) 959:) 941:) 913:) 899:) 876:) 857:) 837:) 829:. 810:) 792:) 765:) 739:) 723:) 671:) 625:) 561:) 496:) 482:) 464:) 409:) 381:) 312:-- 286:) 259:) 244:) 225:) 199:) 184:) 164:) 132:) 111:) 86:) 2105:. 2074:) 2070:( 2057:. 2050:. 1849:. 1842:. 1722:( 1669:( 1640:( 1621:( 1585:( 1488:( 1460:( 1443:. 1400:( 1378:( 1336:( 1303:( 1215:( 1132:( 1050:( 971:( 955:( 937:( 909:( 895:( 872:( 853:( 833:( 806:( 788:( 761:( 735:( 719:( 667:( 621:( 557:( 492:( 478:( 460:( 445:) 441:• 437:( 405:( 377:( 365:) 361:• 357:( 282:( 255:( 240:( 221:( 195:( 180:( 160:( 128:( 107:( 82:( 50:.

Index

Talk:Symbian
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Stichbury
talk
16:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Bpringlemeir
talk
00:59, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
81.181.70.18
talk
21:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Bpringlemeir
talk
13:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
81.181.70.18
talk
09:51, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
210.84.59.38
talk
02:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
SaiferPhoenix
talk
14:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
TiagoTiago
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑