Talk:Penn State child sex abuse scandal/Archive 2

1490:. There is probably nothing in Centre County not tied to Penn State. If you've ever lived there, you know that to be true. Your Corbett article specifically discusses using Joe Paterno as a scapegoat. The words "Penn State" appear in that article about 20 times. It specifically states that Corbett was "raking in cool millions in campaign contributions from Penn State-related benefactees, big wheels and alums." Did you even read the article that you linked? Corbett is also a member of Penn State's board of trustees. That is hardly makes him unrelated to Penn State. Calling Corbett's role a partisan "cheap shot" is strictly your partisan POV. Even with that said, you cannot pull out a few articles on peripheral events related to this scandal and say "see, there are other things that aren't explicitly the univeristy's fault so it can't be titled as such". Such articles to not invalidate the fact that the overwhelming majority of coverage on events and people are at, related to, or involve Penn State. Coincidentally, it is telling that both of the articles that you linked refer to the issue as the "Penn State scandal". This isn't surprising though because almost all media does. 1482:

him. When Penn State's Athletic Director and Senior Vice President are on trial, the focus will be on them. When the civil litigation against Penn State is in full swing, that will be the story. Are we to create separate stub and start-class articles every month for the "Tim Curley perjury scandal" or the "Gary Shultz coverup scandal" or one called the "Penn State riots" and one called the "Graham Spanier resignation" and one called the "Joe Paterno firing" and one called the "Rodney Erickson alumni apology tour" and one called "Board of Trustees Chairman resignation" and one called the "Department of Education Penn State Cleary Act Investigation" or one called the "NCAA Penn State inquiry"? Perhaps those articles will break out naturally in the future, but this article is the parent of all of those issues and is correctly titled to encompass all aspects of the story of the scandal. The focal point is "Penn State" and everything, including future breakout articles, stems from it. There is no way around that.

551:, is referred to by no less than 90% of the national and international media as some variation of the "Penn State Scandal", and absolutely involves more than just Jerry Sandusky's alleged crimes, as the arrest of two high level Penn State officials can attest to. The reason his crimes are a scandal is the institutional coverup that, according to the grand jury report, ranged from the janitors to the highest reaches of the administration, as well as the arrests, suspensions and resignations of some of the most prominent figures at Penn State, not to mention the subsequent fallout including the student riots, civil litigation against the university, and whistle blowers speaking to the culture of coverup and control that has allegedly plagued the institution. The recent attempts by the university's President and PR department to spin this away from the university 2336:

right? Particularly in retrospect. "In bad taste." Like that. But bad jokes certainly happen. They are one of the ways people communicate. At this point of course I see no humor in the "joke" nor do I believe Dowd did; I hope you don't, seriously, either. "Jokes" in the face of a horror one can't see a way to change or challenge are common and informative. Particularly a horror like this which, while close at hand, doesn't necessarily threaten most members of a group. So the joke is a "casual warning shot" for the majority. I see the Sandusky-threat joke as a grim marker of the mindset which seems to have allowed this alleged outrage to fester -- so close but ... -- for years. In the context, now, of Sandusky being tried on charges which would seem to put the horrible truth to the "joke", I don't see citing the "joke" as breaking the policies you've cited.

1258:

highest reaches of the administration, as well as the arrests, suspensions and resignations of some of the most prominent figures at Penn State, not to mention the subsequent fallout including the student riots, civil litigation against the university, and whistle blowers speaking to the culture of coverup and control that has allegedly plagued the institution. There are multiple ongoing investigations of the university by the FBI, the Department of Education, the state of Pennsylvania, NCAA inquiries, and on and on, not to mention multiple lawsuits against the university not just from alleged victims, but from to the media attempting to access information through open record laws as well as insurance companies alleging university negligence in its handling of the situation. Even the Second Mile charity has been reported to be "

3462:

The fact is that the Freeh Report was commissioned by the PSU trustees and is the official record of the incident. To "argue" about the motivations of the trustees in commissioning it is to stray into POV: the trustees commissioned it, Freeh assembled it, and the trustees let it stand. Those are verifiable facts. The Paterno family did not accept the conclusions of the report. They created their own investigation and selected the investigators (the two primary verifiable facts) who could hardly be called "independent" since they were given the commission to clear Paterno's name by his family, a point easily sourcable from RS and that (as above) would be one of many absolutely essential critiques of the Paterno family's effort should any edit attempt to give it equal weight to the Freeh Report.

2023:, this page has to use a self-descriptive title or be deleted by an admin/crat at one point. I suggest you start thinking of a new title. If you think you have enough factual material that centers on Penn State, I can suggest a self-descriptive title "Penn State alleged culpability of Jerry Sandusky sex crimes" or something along those lines. Of course, that means we another self-descriptive title "Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse allegations" to hold the "epicenter" materials. Whether its one page or separate pages, I don't care. Even if you changed the title, if you mention "Penn State sex abuse scandal" on this page, google will list it as a top hit so don't worry about your preferred title being forgotten or disassociated from the alleged "whiteashing". TTFN. — 3050:

incidents allegedly took place at Penn State (note that the JS was not indicted on any of those charges), but that the majority took place elsewhere and the fact that JS was a FORMER coach at Penn State, but worked at the Second Mile during the entire time period, makes this Topic erroneous, and sensationalized. As the leadership from Penn State who stand accused have NOT been indicted yet...and it appears that all charges may be dropped...this again is misleading. This we know is true: Sandusky worked at the Second Mile the ENTIRE time that he was abusing children. ALL of his victims were groomed through this organization...NONE through Penn State.

2766:

refer the matter to Pennsylvania State Police. At the heart of the scandal is the power granted to the University to provide government services on its campus, i.e., the power to hire and supervise a police department. The power and right of the university to operate the campus police had been challenged in court unsuccessfully. (See Rogalski v. PSU, Middle District of Pennsylvania 1988-89) The difference is that when a state actor like a municipal corporation, i.e. State College, fails to properly investigate a crime, it is protected by sovereign immunity from legal liability, but a state affiliated university, has no such immunity.

1787:". The media initially came up with "Penn State sex abuse scandal" to refer to scandal for whatever reason but it is not necessarily an accurate name. Did you check the hits google returned? Excluding this wikipedia page, the top twenty pages of hits are news articles and editorials dated around November 2011. Naturally, there are more articles linking back to those primary articles. Just because the term had a headstart, does not make it right. At this time, the media consensus on what to call the scandal is somewhat in flux. If you checked google news instead, you would know that. 1699:. The individual crimes, which are more than just Sandusky's, are only components of one giant scandal all linked to protecting the university. To take a page from your book, feel free to start a break-out article more thoroughly covering Jerry Sandusky's alleged crimes or the crimes of Tim Curly or Gary Schultz. The vast majority of articles and reports specifically talk about events in the context of Penn State, even in spite of Penn State's PR campaign. Here are specific articles discussing specifically why it is a "Penn State scandal" and not a "Jerry Sandusky scandal": 2444:(not as strong as a tone) to it. Your very shift from this talk page to my user page, in this context, may speak to a discomfort with addressing the issue directly (in turn revealed in, may I call it overcompensation? (talk-down-ness), there). I venture into such analysis with some trepidation but this is after all personal all around, wouldn't you agree? Deeply personal events in others' lives; and our personal judgment calls. And feelings: I was stung by "snarky"; you were stung, maybe, by "tone". I trust you'll consider this, also, as/if we go forward. Cheers. 1532: 1829:". Am I being difficult here? Or should I just escalate / defer this issue to the crats? Between you and me, I think PSU BOT and Corbett are busy CYA on this, especially after claiming that Baldin was only representing Penn State not Curley and Schultz at the Grand Jury hearing, but that is just my opinion not a statement of fact, which cannot be incorporated into wikipedia. To me, the cover-up is just another case of rich elites covering up for another rich elite, no matter how foul. BTW, you might want to check out how wikipedia handles the following: 3391:

into the extent and causes of the scandal with the aim of determining and assigning blame. There is a world of difference between such a report and a critique commissioned by the family of one of the complicit parties, the purpose of which from its creation was not an objective probe into issues of guilt and responsibility but rather a pre-determined attempt at vindication of that party. Its very purpose thus disallows it as any kind of RS, and the prior edit here did an adequate job of summarizing it without giving it undue weight.

1394:. Focus about the subject matter and beat it to death. The subject is Jerry Sandusky and his alleged sex with multiple male children, so call the scandal "Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal". If you are really hell-bent on Penn State, you are welcome to create a page for "Penn State (mis)handling of Jerry Sandusky alleged child sex abuse" or something. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to be part of the Sandusky cover-up, not just those affliated to Penn State. TTFN. — 2071:

up to be, why didn't the AG charge him as the "ring-leader" for the cover-up? The legal case for the cover-up is falling apart BTW, with the death of Paterno, since he was actually (gasp) the cooperating witness for the prosecution. If you insist, you need to establish "Joe Paterno is Penn State" first (possibly in Joe Paterno's article if not here) with indisputable facts, not with editorial opinions. You may have to do the same with "The Second Mile is Penn State". o.0

3532:

of the mountains of criticism that it in its turn received. What I would not like, though, would be to place the Paterno family report as co-equal to the Freeh report or to have the article appear to be trying to vindicate Paterno. It's a fine line indeed between reporting what the family report said and presenting it as of itself factual or accurate. I have a fairly intense work schedule over the next few days but will return to this ASAP. regards,

31: 2412:

you may have noted my distinguishing between reporting and opinion. Yes, she's an opinion writer now. But she's a reporter at base. And what I was citing was a piece of reporting. Maybe not reporting that would make it in a "regular news" story, but reporting. And my trust of her reporting is strong, here. In other words, I don't think she or her sources are "making it up". That is an important test you both seem to be ignoring.

1126:). As such, I feel using Google or any search engine to establish "common use" for new terms is circular and asinine. Then again, when I googled in "Penn State sex abuse scandal", most of the top hits link back to older news articles and editorials (and the actual name used in the hits did not match the "exact" search), so a web search may be misleading. I did Google news search instead for the past month: 867:- Google "Joe Paterno sex abuse scandal", and I get ~2,610,000 results. But it's not about him, nor is it about Penn State. Knowledge is neutral. While we can blindly follow sources, redirects from other likely searches are cheap. Our policy says NPOV. We shouldn't be drawing with the big crayon just because it's big; we're trying to stay inside the lines we've drawn for ourselves. 2273:, with the comment it "add no informational content". It bore directly on JSandusky. Yes, it's a different kind of knowledge. Yes, it was reported in the context of an opinion column. But for me it added a layer of useful knowledge about both the individual and the surroundings/context of his activities -- in other words, information, and of solid credential. Any thoughts? 3121: 299:

within the links of the university and with its own sidebar as it's a major part of the school's history - this is fine. However, a redirect from "Penn State sex abuse scandal" to "Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal" with the latter as the title is more appropriate given the singular nature of the story. Please consider this- it'd be greatly appreciated.

2407:, Jtalledo, and do find you a thoughtful editor from glancing sightings. However, I hope you'll still appreciate that an editor -- me -- cannot help but take personally the disrespectful, I'd have to call it, dismissal of my best estimation of a source. There are all too few, from before McQueary and on, to speak out forcefully and bravely (well, as one 1821:

jury pool. Penn State has been not charged with anything. Curley and Schultz are both innocent until proven guilty. Then again, so does Jerry Sandusky, so this page should really be called "Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse allegations" with another section (or new page) for "Penn State alleged cover-up of Jerry Sandusky sex crimes". Just like

3444:

You could just as easily argue that the board of trustees report was commissioned to clear the name of Penn State at large and place the blame on Joe Paterno. Has anyone else read both reports? It is also unclear how you can say that it is biased when it was undertaken by 3 independent investigators.

3251:

As a professor at Penn State, I really find it offensive to refer to this as a "scandal." This is a euphemism for what actually occurred: sex crimes and their cover-up. I do not have any idea how to address this, and I do not know where in the criminal process Spanier and co. are. But the tendency

2888:

There is not enough information about the Freeh report, especially criticism of it. Why is it that the conclusions of the report are not supported by the information presented in it? How can the NCAA use this report as its sole source to bypass its own procedures to punish the wrong people and have

2411:

put it, McQ. took a "middle road"; ... but "forcefully and bravely"? well, I'll leave that to others for now) for the less powerful in these cases. MDowd has proven herself to be willing and able to speak out forcefully and bravely (and insightfully) and has certainly earned my trust to a degree. And

1481:

First, as noted above and you fail to address that the vast majority of media coverage and stories have focused on Penn State. Of course the focuses of the story will change as news unfolds but Penn State is and will remain at the center of the scandal. When Sandusky is at trial, the focus will be on

1070:

So, I learned something new about the Ripper. But, my point remains the same. As for the general policy for the title of an object: "When the subject of an article is referred to mainly by a single common name, as evidenced through usage in a significant majority of English-language reliable sources,

1033:

written by someone claiming to be the murderer, that was disseminated in the media. Wow, you learn something new from wikipedia every day - I need to donate more often. Since you have been mentioning this "wiki policy", please point to me this policy that requires wikipedia to rely on the "mainstream

966:

have been called something other than the phrase that caught on. (Just as you can argue that the fact the school officials didn't notify the police make the name completely appropriate.) But, the solution is to find the most objective means of naming the article. And, I have yet to see anyone provide

908:

No offense, but this argument is a pretty clear indication of your bias in this matter. The fact that you feel "Paterno's moral and professional culpability was next to nothing" is yet another opinion that should have no bearing on this article. Again, the google search I pointed to above is thus far

462:

These people aren't necessarily "accusers" -- they are not plaintiffs in a case, but witnesses to a state prosecution. Adding "alleged" before victim is ok by me. (unless referring to grand jury report, where "Victim 1" etc is fine). BTW, I heard Sandusky's new defense is that he was teaching these

298:

Why is this called the Penn State sex abuse scandal? One man is the central figure in this story, and not the university- the entire school did not participate in his actions and you are condemning 3,000,000+ educated readers of your website with this title. It's perfectly unbiased to keep the page

3294:

I must disagree in turn with you. In the US media, the term scandal is most often applied to sex crimes; the fall-out over the shooting of Trayvon Martin is not referred to on Knowledge as a "scandal." If Knowledge is not concerned about how using the term "scandal" influences readers' perceptions

1866:

Wow, now Knowledge is tainting the jury pool! I guess just like 100s of local, national and international media outlets around the globe, dozens of them linked above. That may be one of the most ridiculous statements I've ever read, right up there with "media is no less biased than PSU PR". But what

1554:

Third, you really want to give special weight to month-long list of google hits that still doesn't come out in your favor? Well how about we list the major media that currently categorizes their collection of these stories under a variation of the "Penn State scandal" title, like what this Knowledge

957:

NO! This isn't an objective question about what WE think it should be called. It's what the general media calls it. If you want to call that a 'popularity argument', fine. The same can be said for why we allow citations to the New York Times, but don't allow people to cite Bobby Joe's Blog Only Read

739:

The immediate and common thread between all parties involved is Jerry Sandusky, not just Penn State. Yes, Penn State was a common thread for most of the persons involved, but Jerry Sandusky is the person around whom the entire scandal centers. I am maintaining that Penn State is unnecessarily broad,

443:

Many of the places I see the word victim are specifically refering to the grand jury report which refered to "Victim 1" and Victim 2" and so on as an identifier. In places where it's just standard prose writing I'd agree with you, but not anywhere where it's clearly and specifically refering to the

3531:

Interesting links. As you see, I rv'd the full restoration on the basis of lack of consensus for it - but that does not mean we can't work together to improve the section. I would be amenable to a careful expansion of the Paterno family report discussion, as long as the expansion also included some

3461:

I believe that you have expressed the difference between the two reports clearly here. You note that an editor "could just as easily argue" a point - but such "argument" is antithetical to the very purpose of Knowledge articles, which is to present the verifiable facts about the article's subject.

3424:

There should be no more than a sentence or two about the Paterno family report. It played no part in the investigation or its outcome. It's a biased report with only one purpose, clearing the name of Joe Paterno. It belongs on the Paterno page, not here. If it was placed here, than it would only be

3068:

As an initial response: The Freeh Report commissioned by the PSU Board of Trustees in unequivocal in its findings and makes exactly the opposite point, asserting that this is a Penn State scandal in the cover-up of Sandusky's activities by at least four top officials of the university. You can read

3049:

This page name needs to be renamed! It is the Jerry Sandusky/Second Mile Child Abuse Scandal This scandal was erroneously marketed by the media, initially, as a "Penn State" scandal. It has since been corrected in the media as the Jerry Sandusky/Second Mile scandal. HERE ARE THE FACTS: SOME of the

2619:

No offense to anyone who has edited this previously, but does some of the more graphic natures of the sexual crimes really need to be openly and publically aired? Instead of discussing him ejaculating or having boys place their hands on his penis --- couldn't this be toned down better for the sake

2584:

I added Category:Child sexual abuse to the Big Jock page. I thought that was enough to link the two (to each other and to others at other institutions). I think the "football" (two kinds) link is a bit attenuated. To have just the song as See also and no other CSA events seems sort of out of place;

2070:

MaroonGray123, I am not from Penn State so please excuse me for not emphatizing with their delusion that Joe Paterno is no more than a subordinate who escalated a possible sex crime to his superiors. Think about it from my perspective: if Paterno is as powerful as his legion of fans/haters make him

1281:

and the fall out which includes the downfall of the university's top leadership including the firing of the university's President and arrests of a Senior Vice President and its Athletic Director. Whether you think it is fair or not that Penn State is primarily associated with Sandusky's crimes, it

843:

Just to be clear, my search used quotation marks around those phrases. Is this ironclad evidence? No. But, when you have one search phrase showing more than 10x more hits that the other phrase, it certainly provides some insight into the matter. Unless someone comes up with some evidence to support

3560:

Please do respond when you get the chance. I think the major issue here is the implicit suggestion the the Freeh Report is the more accurate of the two and thus should constitute the basis of what is fact and what is not. Both reports in my mind are equal parts enlightening and dubious. People are

3072:

and note that it reads in the "Findings" section of the "Executive Summary" on page 14 that "Four of the most powerful people at the Pennsylvania State University - President Graham B. Spanier, Senior Vice President-Finance and Business Gary C. Schultz, Athletic Director Timothy M. Curley and Head

2425:

The word "open" has come back to me in thinking about this all since my last (long) entry. Yes, the phrase "open joke" is a common phrase. But MDowd didn't use it cavalierly; in a snarky way; I don't believe. She had reason to believe, from her source(s) that the joke was relatively widespread and

2335:

I appreciate the responses. Neither of you seem to look at the "information zone" from the point of view of, say, a vulnerable 13-year-old-boy or the, say, passing college sophomore or even mid-level coach (all potential objects of or propagators of the "joke"). This is what I'd call a "bad joke",

2200:

The grand jury presentment states that McQueary testified that, on March 1, 2002, at 9:30 pm, he entered the locker room at the Lasch Football Building at Penn State and heard what he believed to be the sounds of sexual activity coming from the shower. He looked in the shower and "saw a naked boy,

2191:

McQueary testified that, on March 1, 2002, at 9:30 pm, he entered the locker room at the Lasch Football Building at Penn State and heard what he believed to be the sounds of sexual activity coming from the shower. He looked in the shower and "saw a naked boy, Victim 2, whose age he estimated to be

2035:

It is not a trending name. The vast majority of major news outlets still use it as documented above. It has been explained by others why Google hits isn't a reliable and that is your only argument. I'm not going to rehash this over and over. This has already been through two discussions. You don't

1933:

are telling me that "Second Mile is Penn State" too because the large donations from Penn State? I'm sorry man, if you want to build a case against Penn State, that is fine with me, but wikipedia has to be neutral on this subject matter, which centers around "Jerry Sandusky" and his alleged "child

1493:

Speaking of people, your attempt to distance Sandusky from the university by claiming he was retired, like the university itself is trying to do, is patently misleading. Conveniently, you must have forgotten that he had Professor Emeritus status."He was given a parking pass and was allowed to keep

3390:

I agree with this. I think the treatment of the Paterno family-commissioned report was covered adequately in the previous edit. The Freeh Report was commissioned by the PSU Board of Trustees and as such carries with it the weight of official status. Freeh's investigation was just that: an inquiry

3274:

I disagree. "Scandal" is often applied to criminal behavior and refers not just to the behavior itself but to all of the fall-out, such as media coverage, criminal and civil repercussions, damage to reputation, and so forth. I think it's a great way to describe the Penn State/Sandusky debacle and

2349:

for now in detail though my general response would be that fictional re-imaginings of current events, also, can shed light on a situation and are regularly cited in Knowledge. Included here? If done right in a section of its own, it'd quite possibly be fine (to some if not you necessarily). But I

2302:

A layer of useful knowledge or a source of amusement (as you do cede that it was a joke)? Assuming it was the former, what additional insight would this add for the average reader? This quote provides no information unless you consider a snarky, unsupported gibe informative; particularly one that

1820:

There is no central authority on what to name this scandal, not the media, and certainly not PSU PR department. The only thing we can do is use a neutral and descriptive title. If you really feel Penn State should pay for its crimes, then you are doing a fantastic job using wikipedia to taint the

1257:

This scandal absolutely involves more than just Jerry Sandusky's alleged crimes, as the arrest of two high level Penn State officials can attest to. The reason Sandusky's crimes became a scandal is the institutional coverup that, according to the grand jury report, ranged from the janitors to the

724:

This is buoyed by Paterno's December interview with the Washington Post in which he outright said he didn't know it was possible for a male to rape another male (sounds odd to us internet denizens, but he was from another time). In other words, I am maintaining that Paterno was not necessarily as

3704:

Finally got back to this this morning. Someone beat me to it. I notice there are a two other references to Dowd. Though I haven't read either of those two columns, their use doesn't appear to be as ill-conceived as the Horror Story one. But the reference to her June 19 column appears to be a

2765:

From reading the Freeh Report, the State College Police Dept. was involved in the investigation of Sandusky in May, 1998 (page 45). Despite the fact that the State College Police Dept. had jurisdiction over the campus, it declined to pursue criminal action against Sandusky, nor did it apparently

2363:

Dowd put her name on it. I'll try to look at the previous debate on her other inclusion(s). I'd seen she was already cited; thanks for the debate citation. But in the "joke" context she has the credibility and standing to report it. If there's a rebuttal, that too of course would be allowed. But

1475:

I took the time to write this rebuttal to Hasdi Bravo's comments in the move discussion immediately above, but it had already closed by the time I submitted, so I'm going to post this anyway mainly because of the article links that could be useful for the article or in future discussions. I just

3646:

I think the factual accuracy of the page would be improved by making it evident that the claim in unsupported. I've been informed that is against policy unless there is a published reference that can be cited. So lacking that, it would seem that removal of the paragraph would be an improvement.

2201:

Victim 2, whose age he estimated to be ten years old, with his hands up against the wall, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky." However McQueary has later disputed this characterization denying that he ever used the words "anal" or "rape" to describe the incident to anybody.

2050:

The number of discussions that have gone through is really irrelevant. The naming of articles are always subject to change. There have been many an article titled one thing (on the grounds that it was how the media initially (~3-6 months) referred to a story) that were later changed. I don't

1686:

This isn't an article on a neologism. Even if it were, I've already linked dozens of reliable sources commenting about the name (and more are below). But what we are engaged in is a discussion about the name of an article about the events of a scandal. Even if that guideline was applicable, is

1518:

until after the scandal. Perhaps most importantly, it also ignores the allegations of Sandusky transporting victim #4 on Penn State charter flight and staying in Penn State's hotel for the 1999 Alamo Bowl when he was still an assistant coach, a matter that is the subject of a Pennsylvania, San

3486:

to be the basis for NCAA sanctions. Also, could you point to non-circumstantial evidence that the investigators were commissioned to clear Joe Paterno's name explicitly? Additionally, in terms of the trustees, your argument is a little flawed as, "(Trustee)Mr. Eckel said that Penn State never

1867:

jury pool? I thought "Penn State has been not charged with anything", as if an attorney general can arrest a university? Add that to the list of ridiculous statements. On the other hand, how many civil litigations thus far has Penn State now been named in? At least four: at least two victims

3365:

A critique of the report should be addressed under the heading of that report. A subheading covers a section of the topic, in this case the Penn State child sex abuse scandal. The critique is of the report, not of the topic itself, therefore giving it a section of its own would grant it

2554:

I disagree, no media link has been made between the two cases so we do not need to either. Also linking to a football clubs song is not appropriate. That should not be readded to this article without sources making the connection or comparing the situation, even then it is not needed.

1902:. If you actually get outside of the area, you would be aware that everyone, all over the country, refers to this as the "Penn State scandal", and your opinion about a Board of Trustees coverup just further drives home the appropriateness of the title beyond common name applicability. 884:- I think it is better for the name to focus on the "point of origin", and then state the people and entities affected by the scandal. Otherwise, the existing name may unnecessarily give the presumption of guilt to others that may or may not have nothing to do with the case. Read the 725:

involved as everyone thought he might have been a few months ago. Considering that Paterno is dead and the matter will never go before a court of law, the opinions of the public and the media are as specific as we're ever going to get, and it looks like public opinion has shifted.

2084:. If you are saying that the title should be based on objectivity rather than popularity then we may have some point of agreement here. As Jheiv noted, this article needs to be renamed at one point, just like titles the "vast majority of major news outlets" used before including 716:

has continued to receive considerable attention even as the rest of the scandal attention has died down. Joe Paterno is still the most well known Penn State figure, and his lack of inclusion changes the dynamics of where the scandal lies. For example, there was a call in the

2503:

Are the San Anton' cops investigating whether Chester molested the boys in the Alamo Bowl itself, or are they investigating whether it molested boys in a hotel room or other places during the week Penn State was in town???Johncheverly 20:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)johncheverly.

3642:

As currently written, it implies that Dowd attended the first day of the trial and that this open joke was revealed in the trial. And that's also the implication one gets from reading Dowd's column. However, there's nothing in the trial transcript that supports her claim.

1929:. Then, the unbiased media told me that Joe Paterno is responsible for enabling Jerry Sandusky because "Joe Paterno is Penn State". What the *hell* does THAT even mean? I must say that the more I dig into this, the more irrational and hysterical this turned out to be. Now 2018:

Anyhow, this may all be moot. It is clear to me that "Penn State sex abuse scandal" is nothing more than a "trending name" back in November 2011. My last google news search shows that the "unbiased" media is shifting to "Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal" instead. Without

1687:

Knowledge's name for this article "increase usage of the term" when everyone is already using it? The article was named as such because it was already the overwhelming common name, something you even seem to admit was the case in at least the past. You logic is flawed.

1694:

the common name according to a survey of local, national and international media. I've made the case it is distinctly a Penn State scandal because it involves so many people at all levels of the university, and most importantly which no one can seem to refute, because

3005:

This is all about the collectively poor judgement of many people who were all at Pennsylvania State University in some manner. So, why is the name of the article "Penn State child sex abuse scandal" instead of "Pennsylvania State University child sex abuse scandal"?

2135:

to consider here. Penn State has been doing a fine job to legally disassociate themselves (if not publically) from Sandusky, as well as Curley and Schultz. Knowledge CAN document facts against Penn State but CANNOT insinuate or suggest their guilt and/or culpability

406:

This is pretty standard in news media, since Sandusky is innocent until proven innocent. The term "accuser" was used for other child molestation incidents such as the one involving Michael Jackson. The current article is biased and implicitly finds Sandusky guilty.

1916:

Dude, I *am* outside of the Penn State area. The only times I have been to the state of Pennsylvania was when I was passing through to get to New York City. When I first read about "Penn State sex abuse scandal", my first thought was some kind of hanky-panky by the

2426:

commonly understood. So "open" is critical to the comments I made above about "information zone"s -- itself not an elegant phrase but an effort to explain. Much of your two comments, yours at least Jtalledo, maybe dwelt more on the "joke" component of the phrase.

958:

by His Mother.com. I'm not saying the Google search I provided is indisputable evidence, but when you have Phrase X used 10x more than Phrase Y, and both phrases are related to the exact same topic, I think it's a fair guess that Phrase X is the dominant phrase.

583:

The fact that Penn State administrators are trying to get the name of this incident changed in the media probably should be reported in this article, but it is indicative, in itself, of even more reason why the current article title is accurate and appropriate.

728:

Also involved in the scandal is the failure of the local district attorneys to act upon the evidence given to them earlier (aside: I am not faulting them, only stating that their lack of action on the issue is potentially scandalous and ought to be part of the

3156: 2971:

I completely 100% disagree. The scandal is due to the inaction of Penn State officials and the leadership of the Penn State football program. The story is not about one man's actions at all. Do not rename it! (Haven't we had this discussion before?) Dave

2569:

You don't need sources comparing the two situations. If there were sources, then obviously it wouldn't be in the See also section, it would be integrated in text. The reason it links to a song is that there isn't a page dedicated to the incident itself.

991:

because that is what the "general media" called it back in 2011, in anticipation of the mass panic and hysteria that never occured. Then again, we can always count on the "general media" as the source of neutral and unbiased information, especially the

2689:

Section's far too long. There's far too much dedicated to the discussion of the decision process/reaction to the decision. The main focus should be the penalties themselves, with perhaps a paragraph about everything else surrounding the penalties.

2856:

My apology at getting the name wrong. I think it deserves its own section because the investigation was commissioned by Penn State's board, Freeh is a notable figure, and the report's conclusions and Penn State's reaction were very public.

3665:

Yes, remove it. It is extremely misleading, at best. Not everyone realizes that Dowd likes to make sarcastic wisecracks for semi-humorous purposes, and she has little regard for the facts. It would be better to quote late night comedians.

1934:

sex abuse". Until Penn State officials and former employees has been convicted of anything, any allegations against Penn State are just allegations and must be stated as such, even if I think that PSU BOT and Corbett are as guilty as sin.

2140:). Thus, we cannot use THAT as a justification to have "Penn State" in the title, which is the gist your argument if I understand it correctly. Right now, this page is being used as a "dumping ground" to file a number of related topics: 1008:

No, you're right, we should use our subjective opinions about something; I'm going to change "Jack the Rippers" page to "Jack the Slicer", because he really didn't "rip" anyone. Who cares what the "mainstream media" refers to something

3073:

Football Coach Joseph V. Paterno - failed to protect against a child sexual predator harming children for over a decade. These men concealed Sandusky's activities from the Board of Trustees, the University community and authorities."

1523:

Of course, most of his victims were abused on Penn State facilities and he used the allure of Penn State to lure his victims. Because Jerry Sandusky was "retired" that makes the connection to Penn State irrelevant in what way again?

708:), and I even !voted for the move at that time (which was approved). However, having let the matter sit for a few months, new things have come to light, and my personal opinion on the nature of scandal has changed. Let me explain: 2620:

of readers. Personally I think the tone of the section detailing his crimes comes off as quite a bit pornographic in nature.... almost like the previous editor(s) wanted to write soft-core child porn --- and get away with it.

2945:

This scandal is not actually a Penn State Scandal, it is the Jerry Sandusky Scandal and should be renamed so. To date, there were 3 known assaults on the Penn State Campus late at night and the rest were in other locations.

2350:

hope you'd reconsider comparing the animated episode (coming from a fair "media" distance away) to the "don't bend over for soap around Sandusky" "open joke" (coming from the immediate coach/potential-alleged-victims circle).

2205:

Mostly because we really don't know how McQueary testified. We only that the grand jury presentment makes the characterization. The presentment is drafted by prosecutors and agreed to by a majority of the grand jury panel.

2439:

Finally, Jtalledo, you may think and believe you "understand where coming from" but in light of my above response and our substantive disagreement, upon rereading it just now, it has at least a condescending ("talk down")

632:, like how led the charge of "moral obligation" failure with McQuery and Paterno, and how he pushed the Board of Trustees to fire Paterno instead of placing him administrative leave (as done with Curley and Schultz). BTW, 1145:

It looks like the former term is being phased out by the same "mainstream media" to a slightly more accurate title (although I personally think "Jerry Sandusky child molestation case" is better). YMMV. BTW, the redirect

844:

the opposite conclusion, there's no valid reason to change the title (and, arguments about why you personally think one title is a more precise description than the other is not a valid argument pursuant to Wiki policy.)

3252:

at PSU to refer to the whole episode as the "Sandusky scandal" really grossly understates the incident and is disrespectful to Sandusky's victims. I do not have an easy fix for this; just putting the idea out there.

961:

All of these other arguments about why some people think one phrase is more accurate than the other are irrelevant. These are opinions based on subjective standards. You can certainly find good reasons why the scandal

533:

is on trial here not PSU. Other media has since been calling it "Jerry Sandusky scandal" or "Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal". Should we do something similar (with neutral point of view in mind)? Thoughts? —

1319:, who as the AG assigned only one trooper on the Sandusky (while he assigned other resources prosecuting his political rivals) and let it drag for three years until he became Governor? No, because that is just a 1377:

Second Mile handles the children, not Penn State, and Jerry Sandusky had retired when two of his alleged victims were on PSU grounds. Why not call it "Second Mile sex abuse scandal?" In any case, we cannot claim

1300:

and this scandal absolutely involves more than just his alleged crimes, but the moment you call it Penn State scandal, you draw a fictitious boundary that scopes the crimes to just Penn State and its officials.

2919:

that is purportedly of Rodney Erickson. The first time I saw what Erickson actually looks like, I was surprised he looked nothing like the photo I'd seen on Knowledge. It actually looks like this is a photo of

1323:

partisan issue by Democrats, nothing to do with Penn State. Let we forget the hypocrisy when Corbett and Noonan accused McQuery and Paterno of doing "the bare minimum" and failing his "moral obligation", then

1115:

is newly term phrase coined by the media less than 3 months ago (Nov 7 2011), so I would think it is too early to qualify as a "usual term for the event" or under common usage, so that phrase would fall under

2816:

I notice that today's release of the Free report doesn't appear to be yet mentioned in the article. Anyone have a link to the report and an article that gives Penn State's Board of Trustee's reaction to it?

3613:

Additionally, with the removal of the title of the report in the subsection, the implicit critique of Chief Deputy Attorney General Frank Fina of the Freeh Report lends additional weight to the section.

1973:

There are dozens if not hundreds of articles out there explaining the culture and interconnections that exist at the school. I don't know how many article I have to link. Maybe if you read some of them.

1485:

Second, your statements about the stories that you linked about Second Mile and the governor not having anything to do with Penn State is false. I already linked a story showing that the Second Mile is

2769:

The State College Police should not get a free pass in their conduct here, which implicitly permitted Sandusky to continue his actions, including his off-campus actions in State College Borough.

1436:'s specific crimes. Everything is tied to Penn State and the coverup is the story here. There is clearly a Penn State scandal, in both actuality, and how most of the world refers to the events. 1432:

I absolutely agree that nothing has changed from the original discussion. As was previously noted, it is a scandal that has enveloped Penn State. There are many more facets to this story than

2185:

further stated that he "did not see insertion nor was there any verbiage or protest, screaming or yelling" and denied ever using the words "anal" or "rape" to describe the incident to anybody.

3503: 2209:

I'm not convinced at all that this is the best way to address this ambiguity, but I think its clear we need at least qualify the first section with something that notes his later testimony.

1894:

The issue has already been discussed and decided twice and brought up by you another time. Even a board of trustee candidate for Penn State published that opinion in the Center Daily Times.

1748: 1282:

is the epicenter of the scandal, and it is referred to as such by almost the entirety of the world's media, and that is unlikely to ever change no matter what PR firm Penn State retains.

923:

No offense, but your google argument is still a popularity argument. As a non-PSU graduate, I find it frustrating that the more I learn about the case, the less it has to do with PSU and

1756: 1507: 2537:

has been deleted and re-added several times. Just my two cents, I think it's relevant since it also relates to a sex abuse case associated with a football institution, although it was

1604: 1600: 354:

Keep it as is, for BLP reasons, and also for the fact that this thing has had far-reaching implications for the school and its personnel. Sandusky could redirect to this, of course. ←

1503: 1051:

In the popular media, the particle is sometimes referred to as the God particle, a title generally disliked by the scientific community as a media hyperbole that misleads readers

1556: 3167:

Upon initial viewing, and subsequent views, it appears that the photograph of the man at the top must be Jerry, this is not true. P{lease rearrage or remove until photo places

1252:. It is referred to by no less than 90% of the national and international media as some variation of the "Penn State Scandal" (still to this day). The media is not all biased. 1406:

WP:NEO is not applicable. Its a clear English description, not a new term with inside meaning not apparent through standard English language. Consider the current name not

752:

would be more accurate than the current title, but I don't see anyone proposing this (not the least of which is because some of the acts apparently occurred in other states;

1876: 2080:

the "google hits" argument. I disagreed with JoelWhy of using google hits to justify naming this article as "Penn State sex abuse scandal", so I have been using google as

1511: 1341:

with him at the Grand Jury hearing and refused representation by the then-Penn State lawyer? This is the Google News results for the past month (with duplicates removed):

1548: 526: 1499: 71: 59: 3506: 1535:

in order cite only things in the last month during a period of time when a slew of articles were talking about Penn State's deliberate attempt to rename the scandal..

379: 1495: 3091:

Not to mention the fact that the president of the university was not only asked to resign because of this scandal but has been indicted by a federal grand jury...

1487: 1259: 3705:

citation for some trial testimony. Wouldn't it be better to reference the trial transcript itself, rather than to reference Dowd's perception of the testimony?

2123:

If this is an accurate description of the topic, shouldn't this article be titled "Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse allegations" instead? The publisher for the

110:

The student newspaper today is reporting that the news van alone that was destroyed was $ 100000. I think that students caused more than $ 20000 in damages.

1842: 1159: 1137: 3504:

http://www.post-gazette.com/news/state/2013/07/16/PSU-trustees-call-Freeh-report-speculation-disapprove-of-NCAA-sanctions/stories/201307160202#ixzz30IMLAzYK

1333:

Sure, the PR department of PSU would love to spin this as anything but a "Penn State scandal", but the media is no less biased than PSU PR, and recently is

2316: 2243:

I believe its worth mentioning the "computer glitch" that made the grand jury report public as these meetings and their associated notes are often secret.

705: 548: 778:

The scandal is widely known as the "Penn State sex abuse scandal". Your arguments are all well and good, but have no bearing on what we name this article.

1608: 1804:

and its sub guideline WP:Neo don't apply here at all. Read the whole thing and the comment by Bagumba above. You're taking it completely out of context.

2648:

I didn't put those passages there, but I guess they are in the article to indicate the specificity of the initial allegations. Generally, Knowledge is

983:

Am I to understand we should let the "general media" dictate to wikipedia what this scandal should be called? Well, I suppose we should reinstate the

3379: 1998: 1970: 1652: 282: 240: 3350:

Seems to me that the Freeh Report critique deserves its own subheading on equal footing with the Freeh Report but others feel differently.Thoughts?

1946: 888:. Joe Paterno's moral and professional culpability was next to nothing, yet the article and media focused everything on him. I see zero mention on 3022:

IT IS NOT DUE TO THE INACTION OF PENN STATE LEADERSHIP. IT IS DUE TO THE INACTION OF SOCIAL SERVICES WHO INVESTIGATED SANDUSKY AND CLEARED HIM!

1962: 1883:, FBI over Penn State transporting victims across state lines, NCAA for institutional control, internal Board of Trustees investigation headed by 1309: 1105:). In such cases, the prevalence of the name, or the fact that a given description has effectively become a proper noun (and that proper noun has 368: 140:-- I'm not sure I agree with this. I checked a few navboxes of organizations / people who had "non-official" articles about them -- for example, 47: 17: 3727: 3577: 1825:

and other media-created terms, we can mention somewhere that the alleged sex crimes led to a scandal that is initially referred in the media as "

1664: 927:. To a layman, calling "Penn State sex abuse scandal" mean sex abuse scandal by "Penn State", which is both misleading and limiting in scope. Is 602:

Chill out, guys. I am just asking. :-/ Still, the scope cover-up could go beyond PSU, all the way to the state level, especially on how Governor

3561:

free to disagree, but having read both - that is what I think the fair conclusion to be. A good summary of that argument can also be found here:

1684:"Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Knowledge to increase usage of the term." 529:

and others, PSU President requested the scandal refered as "the Sandusky scandal" rather than Penn State scandal. It kind of make sense, since

2989:

Note that Penn State was handed one of the most severe sets of sanctions in NCAA history because of its role as an institution in the episode.

1868: 1588: 637: 211:

Done. I think the scope should only cover those people and organizations originally named in the grand jury investigation, at least for now. --

2183:

I realize that the grand jury presentment notes that McQueary saw victim 2 "being subjected to anal intercourse" , however we later note that

314:

This has been discussed in great detail, this is how RS refer to it, so the consensus of editors was that this was a more suitable scandal. --

2785: 1151: 502:

Knowledge necessarily must say "alleged victim" unless citing the grand jury document directly, in which case it would be in quotes anyway. ←

255: 1296:^^^ This is exactly the reason why the scandal should be refer to "Jerry Sandusky" rather than "Penn State". You are correct that he is the 3168: 2896: 2377:

Your tone to me, Jtalledo -- "snarky ... actually insightful ...". Well, you're entitled to it. I've reread my own opening query and don't

1544: 84:

While it is true he was arrested on Dec. 7, he spent one night in jail and posted bail of $ 250000 and was released yesterday (Thursday.)

1133: 807:

Google "Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal" = 80,800 results. Google "Penn state sex abuse scandal" = 1,580,000 results. Next topic please.

3743: 3302: 2801: 2250: 1832: 1035: 506: 358: 117: 91: 1793:

applies here UNLESS you have written a book on this particular topic AND named the book "Penn State sex abuse scandal" AND it became a

1312:

Sandusky's preliminary arraignment? No, because the judge only volunteered on the Second Mile, which has nothing to do with Penn State.

1071:

Knowledge generally follows the sources and uses that". "God Particle" = 1.4 million hits; "Higgs Boson" = 3.9 million hits. Try again.

464: 382: 3259: 2708: 2639: 2520: 1520: 3595: 3507:

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8207795/report-freeh-report-source-criticizes-ncaa-penalties-penn-state-nittany-lions

2111: 1531:

is? Again, 90% of the world refers to this as some variation of the "Penn State scandal" and still does. You can't just brush aside

414: 190: 2131:, is calling this "Jerry Sandusky scandal". Why should we favor the title used by other news outlets over any other? There is also 1997:, however Knowledge has decided to use a more neutral article naming, and one that better represents the facts of the situation: " 1188:

The firing of Joe Paterno has continued to receive considerable attention even as the rest of the scandal attention has died down.

372: 333: 1736: 1494:

keys to the football facilities, with a personal office inside. As an esteemed guest, he was free to move openly around campus".

3053:

Please update all titles and references to the correct topic line ("Jerry Sandusky / Second Mile Child Sex Abuse Scandal"). --

2962: 2797:

If nothing else, it serves to illustrate the power of the university over everything in the community, including the police. ←

1527:

You seriously make a statement that the "media is no less biased than PSU PR"!??! You honestly believe that? Do you know what

3214: 2925: 2368:

the citation is required, right? It's not always pretty or universally acclaimed, but "anonymous sources" are routine, right?

1656: 1260:

so embedded in the Penn State community that we might as well start thinking of the charity as an extension of the university

1950: 1270:. Knowledge does not follow the dictates of PR consultants. Can we expect Penn State whitewash to be pushed every month now? 3196: 1592: 741: 332:

based on a "snowball" argument. I still believe that the consensus compromise was that the article should really be called

3137: 2832:

It is mentioned and cited in the lead section, but doesn't appear to be fully fleshed out later in the article. And it's

2739: 2108: 1163: 336:. RS refer to it as a lot of things, but people get their minds set on a certain article name and refuse to budge. Peace, 261:? If so, it's linked in the template title. The link is not visible on this article page since it is linking to itself. -- 3639:

Would there be any objection to removing or rewording the paragraph about Maureen Dowd's "American Horror Story" column?

2124: 1958: 1872: 1338: 722: 3376: 2889:

no jurisdiction to punish the right people? Kevin Slaten has been asking these questions on his radio show for months.

1752: 1716: 1700: 1682:

isn't applicable here at all. It is a guideline talking about how Knowledge is not a dictionary. I'll quote it anyway:

1515: 1510:, despite being under grand jury investigation. Not to mention that the Penn State Creamery had a flavor named after him 1325: 1199: 1112: 893: 822: 695: 629: 279: 237: 1942: 1462:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

670:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

3749: 3038: 2093: 1384:

for a name coined just 3 months ago --- any name for the scandal including "Penn State sex abuse scandal" falls under

1191: 988: 2051:

really see this article being renamed right now, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was renamed down the road.

1648: 753: 749: 606:

mishandled the Sandusky case as Attorney General. I thought it would make sense to focus on the "point of origin". —

2381:

I "asked for ". I hope you maybe now understand better where another serious editor was and is coming from. Cheers.

1941:

on this topic. I don't get how you can't get that Joe Paterno was the most dominating, powerful figure at Penn State

1888: 1708: 1672: 1660: 1536: 3286: 3133: 2981: 2673: 1895: 1740: 153: 38: 2408: 2781: 2118:

sexually assaulted or had inappropriate contact with at least eight underage boys on or near university property.

1712: 1540: 1337:

on what to call this scandal. Things have definitely with new facts come to light. Did you know that Paterno had

1267: 1263: 1162:" has about About 49,700 results. If you disagree with intepretation of the policy, we can escalate this dispute 761: 552: 1624: 3714: 3693: 3675: 3659: 3622: 3599: 3555: 3541: 3517: 3471: 3454: 3434: 3416: 3400: 3383: 3359: 3335: 3310: 3289: 3267: 3241: 3176: 3100: 3082: 3062: 3042: 3015: 2998: 2984: 2935: 2904: 2878: 2866: 2851: 2826: 2805: 2789: 2754: 2718: 2697: 2676: 2659: 2606: 2594: 2577: 2564: 2560: 2548: 2490: 2468: 2453: 2390: 2326: 2296: 2282: 2258: 2232: 2217: 2170: 2163:

I strongly suggest we start thinking about reorganization of the topics and/or articles. No big hurry. TTFN. —

2059: 2045: 2030: 2009: 1982: 1911: 1861: 1846: 1813: 1768: 1445: 1419: 1401: 1369: 1291: 1249: 1240: 1215: 1178: 1080: 1065: 1018: 1003: 976: 952: 945:

in question. If we later find out that Penn State has been hosting orgies involving with minors, let's talk. —

918: 903: 876: 853: 838: 816: 802: 798: 787: 773: 769: 688: 647: 613: 593: 578: 564: 541: 510: 493: 475: 453: 438: 422: 393: 362: 345: 323: 308: 286: 268: 244: 218: 202: 167: 141: 125: 99: 3172: 2900: 3578:

http://deadspin.com/5983159/what-the-paterno-familys-investigation-got-right-and-wrong-about-the-freeh-report

3306: 2254: 1954: 1612: 1266:). The recent attempts by the university's President and PR department to spin this away from the university 721:

for the PSU board to be ousted; it was even the headliner one day on a major conservative magazine's website.

121: 95: 3736: 3373: 3263: 2916: 2635: 2292: 2192:

ten years old, with his hands up against the wall, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky."

2041: 1978: 1966: 1907: 1836: 1809: 1764: 1287: 560: 319: 276: 234: 1785:, that may be in the process of entering common use, but has not yet been accepted into mainstream language 418: 3710: 3655: 3070: 2516: 909:

the only objective evidence presented -- and it strongly suggests the current name is the appropriate one.

304: 2269:

My inclusion of a piece of "common knowledge" -- "an open joke" -- reported by a reputable columnist was

3618: 3591: 3513: 3487:

approved the Freeh report's conclusions, that it approved only moving forward with its recommendations."

3450: 3412: 3355: 3282: 3237: 449: 145: 3706: 3651: 2871:

I moved it to the relatively small civil lawsuits section and changed the section title accordingly. --

2631: 3546:...and I will also respond as best I can to your specific questions above when time permits. regards, 1576: 273:

Right, of course . . . the colors of the box threw me off. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.--

3583: 3430: 3298: 3255: 3026: 3011: 3007: 2950: 2921: 2892: 2777: 2773: 2627: 2538: 2508: 2246: 1801: 1572: 1568: 1380: 1262:". Many articles continue to be produced about the impact of the scandal specifically on Penn State ( 1228: 684: 410: 300: 113: 87: 3205: 2954: 484:

Innocent until proven guilty, innocent until proven guilty. Keep repeating it to yourself, please.

2973: 2958: 2725: 2665: 2556: 2097: 2020: 1937:

I'm not building any case. I'm not writing these articles. The professional news media has 100s of

1899: 1441: 1102: 1097:

Sometimes that common name will include non-neutral words that Knowledge normally avoids (e.g. the

872: 794: 765: 198: 2001:". Eventually, this article will be no doubt be renamed similarly, but this will take some time. 1744: 1564: 3731: 3689: 3671: 3551: 3537: 3467: 3396: 3187: 3078: 2977: 2932: 2875: 2844: 2798: 2715: 2694: 2669: 2656: 2603: 2574: 2545: 2465: 2364:

reportage is allowed on the basis of a reporter's and a publication's credibility -- no citation

2323: 2288: 2037: 1974: 1903: 1805: 1760: 1283: 1091: 574: 556: 503: 355: 315: 265: 215: 3054: 3030: 3317: 3096: 2733: 2664:

I agree that they should remain as long as they are relevant and encyclopedic in tone. Dave (

2512: 1938: 1415: 1248:. It is a Penn State Scandal. Nothing has changed from from the original discussion, nor when 1236: 1211: 1195: 1076: 1014: 972: 914: 849: 834: 812: 783: 1704: 1109:), generally overrides concern that Knowledge might appear as endorsing one side of an issue. 547:

Absolutely Not. What you and Erickson are saying is 100% false. This matter has already been

3614: 3587: 3509: 3446: 3408: 3351: 3331: 3276: 3233: 2649: 2128: 1596: 1407: 1224: 1030: 445: 3320:. I think Dusty has it summed up right: it's the cover-up and related fallout that are the 1720: 1620: 1498:

Further, he conducted football campus at Penn State branch campuses up until at least 2009.

1231:

for lack of compelling reason to override common usage in favor of a softer, neutral name.—

3426: 3367: 3215:

http://progress.psu.edu/resource-library/story/penn-state-issues-statement-on-freeh-report

3058: 3034: 2994: 2862: 2822: 2590: 2486: 2449: 2404: 2386: 2278: 2228: 2132: 1644: 1147: 1098: 1026: 826: 718: 680: 589: 489: 376: 186: 3144: 1728: 1502:

He was also had access to the university's football facilities up until the scandal broke

1320: 3197:

http://progress.psu.edu/assets/content/Louis-Freeh-Report-on-Penn-State-ERRATA-SHEET.pdf

1636: 1584: 3407:

Changed to sub-heading three in order to put in the same subsection as the Freeh Report

2743: 2308: 2137: 2115: 1926: 1437: 1433: 993: 932: 868: 530: 194: 178: 174: 1580: 3685: 3667: 3547: 3533: 3463: 3392: 3074: 2929: 2872: 2837: 2712: 2691: 2653: 2600: 2571: 2542: 2534: 2462: 2320: 2304: 1789: 1679: 1528: 1390: 1122: 740:

while Jerry Sandusky is more specific. It would be just as accurate to call this the

570: 468: 434: 389: 341: 262: 212: 149: 3092: 2312: 1871:, ESPN suing to get access to the 1998 Penn State police investigation of Sandusky, 1668: 1628: 1616: 1453: 1411: 1232: 1207: 1072: 1043: 1010: 968: 910: 845: 830: 808: 779: 661: 3326: 3316:

I don't see the usage as strictly about sex crimes; consider the article on the

3295:

of its reliability, fine; I am not in a position to make such a judgement call.

2924:, who addressed Penn State's Grad School commencement on December 17, 2005. See 2833: 2736:, we may be able to base the name of the page on the full title of the report: " 2085: 1994: 1922: 1884: 1560: 1316: 1203: 1039: 984: 924: 889: 733: 713: 633: 621: 603: 182: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

885: 3445:

What evidence do you have to cite beyond the circumstantial that it is biased?

2990: 2858: 2818: 2749: 2586: 2482: 2445: 2382: 2315:". And note that inclusion of other, actually insightful Dowd quotes has been 2274: 2224: 2210: 2165: 2089: 2052: 2025: 2002: 1856: 1822: 1794: 1774: 1724: 1506:

and was in the university President's box for the football game the week prior

1396: 1385: 1302: 1173: 1155: 1117: 1060: 998: 947: 928: 898: 642: 608: 585: 536: 485: 466:. The attorney did not state what the punishment was for dropping the soap.-- 160: 1891: 1880: 1800:

All that matters is the Knowledge guideline not the definition of the word.

1168:. I am taking a break to give others a chance to state their position. TTFN. 3223: 2311:. Including it would be like including quotes from the South Park episode " 2149:"Penn State firing of Joe Paterno in relation to Jerry Sandusky sex crimes" 1953:

or that the Second Mile was tightly tied to the university on many levels.

2738:

Report of the Special Investigative Counsel Regarding the Actions of the

430: 385: 337: 1034:

media" in naming an article. It would simplify the naming fiasco on the

628:

I noticed no mention of Governor Corbett on this page, particularly his

3209: 3200: 3191: 1640: 1879:

How many investigations is it embroiled in? DOE for violations of the

3148: 2100:, we don't even have a citation for the first sentence on this page: 1987:

Unfortunately, its not that easy. The "professional" news media has

328:

I agree with Mglasgow11. The answer is that, back in early November,

2711:

before actually doing so, given previous disputes over the name. --

1732: 2747:". Shouldn't we archive the report on the commons or something? — 2729: 1875:

and Penn State's insurance company claiming university negligence.

1632: 1308:

Do you see any mention on this page on Judge Leslie Dutchcot, who

1150:

has about 43,200,000 results according to google, but the article

3206:

http://progress.psu.edu/assets/content/Press_Release_07_12_12.pdf

1095:. You neglected the other part which the policy was alluding to " 793:

Proof that it is more common than Jerry Sandusky scandal please?

2458: 1132:"Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal" (About 41 results, including 173:

Agreed. I'd prefer a Penn State sex abuse scandal navbox, with

1898:

As stated by others, there is already a clear and overwhelming

679:, previous RM consensus was very strong for the current title. 375:

since every single alleged victim was a program participant in

3729:

A great article from the NY Times magazine on Spanier's role.

3188:

http://progress.psu.edu/assets/content/REPORT_FINAL_071212.pdf

3115: 25: 2158:"The Second Mile's role in Jerry Sandusky alleged sex crimes" 2146:"Penn State alleged culpability of Jerry Sandusky sex crimes" 1476:

wanted it to be part of the record, sorry for the length.....

3119: 1350:"Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal" (About 184 results) 1029:

you are referencing? The name "Jack the Ripper" came from a

381:... and since the scandal has all but shut down Second Mile 2761:

Responsibility of State College Police Dept. in the scandal

2707:

Probably would've been wise to discuss moving this page to

2187:

So there is clearly a conflict here. Maybe changing this:

1777:

are not restricted to just newly coined word. Look it up: "

967:

a single objective argument about why it should be changed.

760:

I rest my case, and hope that we can come to an agreement.

555:. Knowledge does not follow the dictates of PR consultants. 3227: 3218: 2652:, so if they're deemed relevant I guess they'll remain. -- 2143:"Penn State handling of Jerry Sandusky alleged sex crimes" 1277:. Much like Watergate and all great scandals, here to the 748:, but this isn't as specific as it should be either. Even 706:

Talk:Penn State sex abuse scandal/Archive 1#Requested move

2155:"Tom Corbett's role in Jerry Sandusky alleged sex crimes" 1690:

Finally, I'm not just claiming common name, although it

896:

is well documented and published before. NPOV. Right. —

704:– I realize we just had this discussion 2.5 months ago ( 660:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

2585:

and I also wouldn't want a recap of the Category list.

2478: 2270: 1353:"Penn State child sex abuse scandal" (About 53 results) 1190:

This is more of an argument for a separate article for

700: 329: 137: 1046:

despite the clearly biased statement in that article:

1452:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

1356:"Jerry Sandusky child sex scandal" (About 19 results) 1344:"Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal" (About 66 results) 3482:

of the incident? It is a non-legal document and not

3425:

fair to subject it to a critical evaluation itself.

429:... or alternatively, you can say "alleged victim" 1368:"Penn State/Jerry Sandusky/Joe Paterno scandal" ( 1347:"Penn State sex abuse scandal" (About 55 results) 1154:has about 32,800,000 results, while the redirect 1129:"Penn State sex abuse scandal" (About 78 results) 1469:Response to rebuttal in previous move discussion 1359:"Penn State child sex scandal" (About 3 results) 1273:Boiling it down, Sandusky committed the alleged 2742:Related to the Child Sexual Abuse Committed by 1388:, of which the wikipedia policy is very clear, 825:. Also, a hit does not always provide articles 1089:Since you did not provide me with a link, its 330:the discussion was probably closed prematurely 2599:Sounds like a reasonable solution. Thanks. -- 2152:"Perjury case of Gary Schultz and Tim Curley" 1921:. Until several weeks ago, I didn't know who 1779:a neogolism is a newly coined term, word, or 1158:has about 197,000 results while the article " 138:this article has been added to the PSU Navbox 8: 1843:Franklin child prostitution ring allegations 1362:"Jerry Sandusky scandal" (About 438 results) 1160:Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show controversy 373:The Second Mile-Penn State Sex Abuse Scandal 1038:page. While we are at it, we should rename 334:Jerry Sandusky-Penn State Sex Abuse Scandal 2223:Your suggestion appears to be a good one. 736:, which has nothing to do with Penn State. 3147:may be able to locate suitable images on 3113:We Need a Phot of the Man Himself "Jerry 1410:if a clearer COMMONNAME is not apparent.— 1303:What you see depends on what you look for 521:Renaming proposal: Jerry Sandusky Scandal 3224:http://progress.psu.edu/the-freeh-report 1999:Climatic Research Unit email controversy 1365:"Penn State scandal" (About 570 results) 1250:raised the subject less than a month ago 2036:have consensus or policy on your side. 1315:Do you see any mention on this page on 18:Talk:Penn State child sex abuse scandal 3275:that we should leave the title as is. 2287:Adds nothing useful or informative. -- 1519:Antonio Police, and FBI investigation. 1225:anything is broken to warrant a change 444:wording within the actual documents.-- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1759:. Is 15 enough? There are many more. 1697:the university coverup is the scandal 1152:Native Americans in the United States 931:the problem / villian here, or is it 7: 3723:Huge source on Graham Spanier's role 3478:Can you clarify by what you mean by 3210:http://www.webcitation.org/6IsjY0t8v 3201:http://www.webcitation.org/6IsjSgIzA 3192:http://www.webcitation.org/6IsjLGOmO 675:The result of the move request was: 463:boys cleaning hygiene in the shower. 1833:Lawrence Franklin espionage scandal 1514:and the Book Store stocked his book 1107:become the usual term for the event 1036:The Last Airbender: Legend of Korra 2709:Penn State child sex abuse scandal 2359:"Unsupported" I obviously concede 2107:refers to allegations that former 24: 1669:The Chronicle of Higher Education 636:defended Paterno's response (see 191:Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story 1192:Penn state firing of Joe Paterno 892:'s in this article, even though 701:Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal 402:Change all "victim" to "accuser" 29: 1939:sourced and documented articles 754:United States sex abuse scandal 750:State College sex abuse scandal 569:MaroonGray213, indeed, indeed. 2905:00:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2623:Please consider changing this. 1629:Lehigh Valley The Morning Call 886:preliminary hearing transcript 227:Shouldn't the nav box include 1: 3635:Dowd "Horror Story" reference 3311:16:45, 6 November 2013‎ (UTC) 3101:02:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 3083:19:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 3069:the entire Freeh Report here 3063:17:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 3043:17:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 2740:Pennsylvania State University 2405:your response and sensitivity 2233:22:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2218:22:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2171:15:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 2109:Pennsylvania State University 2060:16:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2046:09:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2031:04:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 2010:16:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 1983:09:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 1912:10:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 1862:05:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 1814:10:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 1488:intimately tied to Penn State 511:03:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 494:02:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 476:01:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 454:21:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 439:21:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 423:17:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 394:15:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 363:15:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 346:14:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 324:19:27, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 309:19:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 287:03:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 269:00:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 245:14:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 219:13:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 203:12:49, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 168:05:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 3750:18:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC) 3715:00:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC) 3694:05:11, 25 October 2014 (UTC) 3676:02:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC) 3660:02:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC) 3336:18:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 3290:17:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 3268:13:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 2936:14:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC) 2196:to something qualified like 2105:Penn State sex abuse scandal 1887:, who knows how many others. 1827:Penn State sex abuse scandal 1769:11:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 1446:06:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 1420:07:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 1402:04:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 1292:04:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1241:22:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1216:20:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1200:Penn State sex abuse scandal 1179:02:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 1113:Penn State sex abuse scandal 1081:22:33, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1066:22:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1019:21:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1004:20:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 977:20:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 953:19:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 919:16:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 904:15:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 877:20:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 854:21:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 839:20:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 817:19:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 803:19:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 788:19:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 774:19:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 696:Penn State sex abuse scandal 689:11:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 648:13:59, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 614:15:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 594:22:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 579:14:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 565:00:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 542:04:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 256:Penn State sex abuse scandal 126:19:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 100:19:31, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 3650:Dissenting opinions sought. 3324:that the title refers to. — 3242:01:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 3016:06:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2999:12:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 2985:12:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 2806:11:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 2790:18:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC) 2732:it not dismissed as a paid 1993:of articles using the term 935:? If you really want to be 827:purely about the seach term 823:comparing GHITS above 1,000 251:Um... are you referring to 3765: 3623:15:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3600:23:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3556:23:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3542:22:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3518:16:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3472:15:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3455:14:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3435:05:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3417:13:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 3401:05:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 3384:13:43, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 3360:23:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 2755:09:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 1633:Johnstown Tribune-Democrat 630:unique role in the scandal 154:CCNY Point Shaving Scandal 132:This article in PSU navbox 2879:10:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 2867:09:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 2852:06:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 2836:. You missed an "h". -- 2827:06:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 2719:21:55, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 2698:19:58, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 2677:17:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 2660:17:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 2607:13:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 2595:20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 2578:19:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 2565:19:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 2549:18:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 2491:23:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 2469:22:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 2454:15:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 2391:22:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 2345:I'm not going to address 2327:20:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 2297:20:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 2283:19:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 2259:14:02, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 1625:Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 987:page to disambiguate the 3182:Archives of report files 3177:14:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 1847:Franklin Coverup Scandal 1459:Please do not modify it. 1328:the BOT to fire Paterno. 1268:is laughably transparent 667:Please do not modify it. 553:is laughably transparent 159:What are your thoughts? 142:Template:Duke University 3228:http://archive.is/0ubTT 3219:http://archive.is/hcxx5 3128:It is requested that a 2911:"Rodney Erickson" photo 1837:AIPAC espionage scandal 1621:Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 1533:3.6 million Google hits 762:Vote now and vote often 3124: 2941:Page should be renamed 1478: 1339:two of his own lawyers 1279:scandal is the coverup 1227:. Continue to follow 3346:Freeh Report Critique 3123: 1919:state of Pennsylvania 1617:Philadelphia Inquirer 1473: 1310:apparently mishandled 821:Care must be used in 732:Also involved is the 146:Duke lacrosse scandal 42:of past discussions. 3722: 3151:and other web sites. 3109:Jerry Sandusky photo 2922:Arden L. Bement, Jr. 2539:association football 2076:Also, I am actually 1555:article is doing... 1529:conflict of interest 939:, then focus on the 549:discussed previously 80:Sandusky re-arrested 3145:WordPress Openverse 3138:improve its quality 3136:in this article to 1223:Not convinced that 1103:Teapot Dome scandal 371:got it... Ok then, 3143:The external tool 3125: 2744:Gerald A. Sandusky 2724:We were lacking a 1673:Comcast Sports Net 1649:Sports Illustrated 653:Requested move (2) 3603: 3586:comment added by 3318:Watergate scandal 3301:comment added by 3258:comment added by 3165: 3164: 3152: 3046: 3029:comment added by 2967: 2953:comment added by 2928:for reference. -- 2895:comment added by 2793: 2776:comment added by 2644: 2630:comment added by 2525: 2511:comment added by 2303:runs contrary to 2271:deleted wholesale 2249:comment added by 2216: 2096:. Due to lack of 2058: 2008: 1845:(redirected from 1835:(redirected from 1609:Los Angeles Times 1194:, which could be 1025:Do you even read 746:sex abuse scandal 474: 413:comment added by 166: 152:doesn't have the 144:doesn't have the 116:comment added by 106:Damages from riot 90:comment added by 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3756: 3746: 3741: 3734: 3602: 3580: 3313: 3279: 3270: 3161: 3159: 3142: 3122: 3116: 3045: 3023: 2966: 2947: 2907: 2847: 2840: 2792: 2770: 2730:The Freeh Report 2643: 2624: 2524: 2505: 2261: 2215: 2213: 2179:Content Conflict 2129:The Patriot-News 2114:assistant coach 2082:counter-examples 2057: 2055: 2007: 2005: 1613:Associated Press 1597:The Boston Globe 1461: 1042:article back to 989:closure of I-405 703: 669: 473: 425: 260: 254: 165: 163: 128: 102: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3764: 3763: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3744: 3737: 3732: 3725: 3637: 3581: 3480:official record 3348: 3296: 3277: 3253: 3249: 3184: 3157: 3155: 3120: 3111: 3024: 2948: 2943: 2913: 2890: 2845: 2838: 2814: 2778:Doctor Franklin 2771: 2763: 2705: 2687: 2625: 2617: 2531: 2506: 2501: 2477:Took that as a 2409:commenter y'day 2267: 2244: 2241: 2211: 2181: 2053: 2003: 1925:was, much less 1637:Huffington Post 1605:Chicago Tribune 1601:Washington Post 1471: 1466: 1457: 1246:Strongly Oppose 1148:American Indian 1099:Boston Massacre 894:his involvement 719:Daily Collegian 699: 665: 655: 626: 523: 408: 404: 377:The Second Mile 258: 252: 189:, and possibly 187:The Second Mile 161: 134: 111: 108: 85: 82: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3762: 3760: 3724: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3679: 3678: 3636: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3347: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3248: 3245: 3231: 3230: 3221: 3212: 3203: 3194: 3183: 3180: 3169:71.182.198.112 3163: 3162: 3153: 3141: 3126: 3110: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3086: 3085: 3021: 3019: 3018: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2942: 2939: 2915:I removed the 2912: 2909: 2897:96.247.198.166 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2813: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2762: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2728:back then. If 2704: 2701: 2686: 2685:NCAA sanctions 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2616: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2557:BritishWatcher 2530: 2527: 2500: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2330: 2329: 2317:debated before 2266: 2263: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2203: 2202: 2194: 2193: 2180: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2156: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2125:first citation 2121: 2120: 2119: 2116:Jerry Sandusky 2074: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 1927:Jerry Sandusky 1852: 1851: 1850: 1840: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1589:New York Times 1470: 1467: 1465: 1464: 1454:requested move 1434:Jerry Sandusky 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1366: 1363: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1313: 1271: 1254: 1253: 1243: 1221:Oppose for now 1218: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1169: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1134:New York Times 1130: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1023: 1022: 1021: 994:New York Times 981: 980: 979: 959: 933:Jerry Sandusky 879: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 795:Magog the Ogre 766:Magog the Ogre 758: 757: 737: 730: 726: 712:The firing of 694: 692: 673: 672: 662:requested move 656: 654: 651: 625: 618: 617: 616: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 531:Jerry Sandusky 522: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 497: 496: 479: 478: 459: 458: 457: 456: 403: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 351: 350: 349: 348: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 248: 247: 222: 221: 206: 205: 179:Graham Spanier 175:Jerry Sandusky 133: 130: 107: 104: 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3761: 3752: 3751: 3748: 3747: 3742: 3740: 3735: 3728: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3634: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3579: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3508: 3505: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3382: 3381: 3378: 3375: 3369: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3345: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3328: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3303:146.186.53.75 3300: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3288: 3287:You can help! 3284: 3280: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3247:Title of Page 3246: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3229: 3225: 3222: 3220: 3216: 3213: 3211: 3207: 3204: 3202: 3198: 3195: 3193: 3189: 3186: 3185: 3181: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3160: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3118: 3117: 3114: 3108: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3051: 3047: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2940: 2938: 2937: 2934: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2918: 2910: 2908: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2880: 2877: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2841: 2835: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2800: 2799:Baseball Bugs 2796: 2795: 2794: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2767: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2710: 2702: 2700: 2699: 2696: 2693: 2684: 2678: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2621: 2614: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2583: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2535:Big Jock Knew 2529:Big Jock Knew 2528: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2499:Alamo Bowl??? 2498: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2470: 2467: 2464: 2460: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2410: 2406: 2403:I appreciate 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2367: 2362: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2348: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2325: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2289:Cameron Scott 2285: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2264: 2262: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2251:128.118.40.78 2248: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2214: 2207: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2186: 2178: 2172: 2168: 2167: 2162: 2157: 2154: 2151: 2148: 2145: 2142: 2141: 2139: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2117: 2113: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2073: 2069: 2061: 2056: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038:MaroonGray213 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2027: 2022: 2017: 2011: 2006: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1975:MaroonGray213 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1904:MaroonGray213 1901: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1859: 1858: 1853: 1848: 1844: 1841: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1830: 1828: 1824: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1806:MaroonGray213 1803: 1802:WP:Dictionary 1799: 1798: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1784: 1783: 1776: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1761:MaroonGray213 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1693: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1676: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1593:New York Post 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1525: 1522: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1491: 1489: 1483: 1479: 1477: 1468: 1463: 1460: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1393: 1392: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1381:WP:COMMONNAME 1376: 1371: 1367: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1342: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1304: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284:MaroonGray213 1280: 1276: 1272: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1229:WP:COMMONNAME 1226: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1125: 1124: 1120:as well (see 1119: 1114: 1110: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1094: 1093: 1088: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1001: 1000: 995: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 965: 960: 956: 955: 954: 950: 949: 944: 943: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 921: 920: 916: 912: 907: 906: 905: 901: 900: 895: 891: 887: 883: 880: 878: 874: 870: 866: 863: 855: 851: 847: 842: 841: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 819: 818: 814: 810: 806: 805: 804: 800: 796: 792: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 776: 775: 771: 767: 763: 755: 751: 747: 745: 738: 735: 731: 727: 723: 720: 715: 711: 710: 709: 707: 702: 697: 691: 690: 686: 682: 678: 671: 668: 663: 658: 657: 652: 650: 649: 645: 644: 639: 635: 631: 623: 619: 615: 611: 610: 605: 601: 595: 591: 587: 582: 581: 580: 576: 572: 568: 567: 566: 562: 558: 557:MaroonGray213 554: 550: 546: 545: 544: 543: 539: 538: 532: 528: 520: 512: 508: 505: 504:Baseball Bugs 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 477: 471: 470: 465: 461: 460: 455: 451: 447: 442: 441: 440: 436: 432: 428: 427: 426: 424: 420: 416: 412: 401: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 360: 357: 356:Baseball Bugs 353: 352: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 321: 317: 316:Cameron Scott 313: 312: 311: 310: 306: 302: 288: 285: 284: 281: 278: 272: 271: 270: 267: 264: 257: 250: 249: 246: 243: 242: 239: 236: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 217: 214: 210: 209: 208: 207: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 171: 170: 169: 164: 157: 155: 151: 150:Template:CUNY 147: 143: 139: 131: 129: 127: 123: 119: 118:75.102.74.137 115: 105: 103: 101: 97: 93: 92:75.102.74.137 89: 79: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3738: 3730: 3726: 3707:DiffuseGoose 3652:DiffuseGoose 3649: 3645: 3641: 3638: 3582:— Preceding 3576: 3502: 3483: 3479: 3423: 3371: 3368:undue weight 3349: 3325: 3321: 3297:— Preceding 3260:65.185.95.39 3254:— Preceding 3250: 3232: 3166: 3129: 3112: 3052: 3048: 3025:— Preceding 3020: 2982:Please help! 2949:— Preceding 2944: 2914: 2891:— Preceding 2887: 2843: 2842: 2815: 2812:Freeh report 2772:— Preceding 2768: 2764: 2748: 2737: 2726:WP:SECONDARY 2706: 2688: 2674:Please help! 2650:not censored 2632:61.31.142.13 2626:— Preceding 2622: 2618: 2533:The link to 2532: 2513:Johncheverly 2507:— Preceding 2502: 2441: 2378: 2365: 2360: 2346: 2313:The Poor Kid 2286: 2268: 2245:— Preceding 2242: 2208: 2204: 2195: 2184: 2182: 2164: 2104: 2098:WP:SECONDARY 2081: 2077: 2024: 2021:WP:SECONDARY 1989: 1988: 1930: 1918: 1900:WP:Consensus 1855: 1826: 1788: 1781: 1780: 1778: 1696: 1691: 1689: 1683: 1677: 1661:The Guardian 1553: 1551:, etc, etc. 1526: 1492: 1484: 1480: 1474: 1472: 1458: 1451: 1429: 1428: 1395: 1389: 1379: 1334: 1297: 1278: 1274: 1245: 1220: 1187: 1172: 1164: 1121: 1106: 1096: 1090: 1059: 1050: 1044:God particle 997: 963: 946: 941: 940: 936: 897: 881: 864: 777: 759: 743: 693: 676: 674: 666: 659: 641: 638:this article 627: 607: 535: 527:this article 524: 467: 409:— Preceding 405: 297: 274: 232: 228: 158: 135: 112:— Preceding 109: 86:— Preceding 83: 65: 43: 37: 3615:TheWarOfArt 3588:TheWarOfArt 3510:TheWarOfArt 3447:TheWarOfArt 3409:TheWarOfArt 3352:TheWarOfArt 3234:WhisperToMe 2834:Louis Freeh 2750:Hasdi Bravo 2361:except that 2166:Hasdi Bravo 2094:Carmegeddon 2086:Climategate 2026:Hasdi Bravo 1995:climategate 1923:Joe Paterno 1885:Louis Freeh 1857:Hasdi Bravo 1675:,etc, etc. 1397:Hasdi Bravo 1317:Tom Corbett 1204:Joe Paterno 1174:Hasdi Bravo 1092:WP:POVTITLE 1061:Hasdi Bravo 1040:Higgs boson 1027:the article 999:Hasdi Bravo 985:Carmageddon 948:Hasdi Bravo 925:Joe Paterno 899:Hasdi Bravo 890:Tom Corbett 756:, anyone?). 742:Penn State 734:Second Mile 714:Joe Paterno 643:Hasdi Bravo 634:Phil Knight 624:off-limits? 622:Tom Corbett 609:Hasdi Bravo 604:Tom Corbett 537:Hasdi Bravo 446:Cube lurker 415:99.55.175.4 183:Joe Paterno 136:I see that 36:This is an 3427:Dkspartan1 3130:photograph 3008:User101010 2978:Talk to me 2926:this photo 2734:WP:PRIMARY 2670:Talk to me 2347:South Park 2090:Nipplegate 1823:Nipplegate 1795:bestseller 1775:Neologisms 1665:Daily Mail 1386:neologisms 1370:one result 1321:cheap shot 1165:over there 1156:Nipplegate 1118:neologisms 929:Penn State 681:Mike Cline 301:Mglasgow11 231:article?-- 3739:Phightins 2955:Nellykire 2479:go-ahead. 1990:thousands 1881:Clery Act 1585:USA Today 1438:CrazyPaco 1408:WP:BROKEN 1298:epicenter 1264:like here 1138:USA Today 937:objective 869:Dru of Id 729:article). 677:Not moved 384:. Peace, 195:GrapedApe 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3686:Sensei48 3596:contribs 3584:unsigned 3548:Sensei48 3534:Sensei48 3484:intended 3464:Sensei48 3393:Sensei48 3299:unsigned 3256:unsigned 3134:included 3075:Sensei48 3039:contribs 3027:unsigned 2974:djkernen 2963:contribs 2951:unsigned 2930:Jtalledo 2893:unsigned 2873:Jtalledo 2786:contribs 2774:unsigned 2713:Jtalledo 2692:Jtalledo 2666:djkernen 2654:Jtalledo 2640:contribs 2628:unsigned 2615:Question 2601:Jtalledo 2572:Jtalledo 2543:Jtalledo 2521:contribs 2509:unsigned 2481:Thanks. 2463:Jtalledo 2321:Jtalledo 2247:unsigned 2239:Untitled 2133:WP:LIBEL 2112:football 1854:TTFN. — 1678:Fourth, 1641:EIN News 1573:Fox News 1565:ABC News 1561:CBS News 1196:spun out 996:. o.0 — 744:football 571:Jweiss11 469:Milowent 411:unsigned 263:Jtalledo 213:Jtalledo 114:unsigned 88:unsigned 3322:scandal 3093:ElKevbo 2802:carrots 2309:WP:NPOV 2138:WP:NPOV 2078:against 1412:Bagumba 1335:divided 1233:Bagumba 1208:Bagumba 1101:or the 1073:JoelWhy 1011:JoelWhy 969:JoelWhy 911:JoelWhy 882:Support 865:Support 846:JoelWhy 831:Bagumba 809:JoelWhy 780:JoelWhy 507:carrots 359:carrots 156:, etc. 39:archive 3684:Agree. 3327:C.Fred 3158:Upload 3149:Flickr 2933:(talk) 2876:(talk) 2839:Jayron 2716:(talk) 2703:Rename 2695:(talk) 2657:(talk) 2604:(talk) 2575:(talk) 2546:(talk) 2466:(talk) 2366:within 2324:(talk) 2305:WP:BLP 1790:WP:NEO 1782:phrase 1680:WP:NEO 1653:Forbes 1430:Oppose 1391:WP:NEO 1326:pushed 1275:crimes 1123:WP:NEO 1031:letter 964:should 942:object 266:(talk) 216:(talk) 3668:Roger 3278:Dusty 3055:PHD77 3031:PHD77 2991:Cla68 2917:photo 2859:Cla68 2819:Cla68 2587:Swliv 2483:Swliv 2446:Swliv 2383:Swliv 2275:Swliv 2265:Query 2225:Cla68 2212:jheiv 2054:jheiv 2004:jheiv 1198:from 1009:as... 640:). — 586:Cla68 486:Cla68 162:jheiv 16:< 3711:talk 3690:talk 3672:talk 3656:talk 3619:talk 3592:talk 3552:talk 3538:talk 3514:talk 3468:talk 3451:talk 3431:talk 3413:talk 3397:talk 3356:talk 3332:talk 3307:talk 3264:talk 3238:talk 3173:talk 3097:talk 3079:talk 3059:talk 3035:talk 3012:talk 2995:talk 2959:talk 2946:```` 2901:talk 2863:talk 2823:talk 2782:talk 2636:talk 2591:talk 2561:talk 2541:. -- 2517:talk 2487:talk 2459:O.K. 2450:talk 2387:talk 2379:feel 2319:. -- 2307:and 2293:talk 2279:talk 2255:talk 2229:talk 2103:The 2042:talk 1979:talk 1908:talk 1810:talk 1765:talk 1657:Time 1645:ESPN 1442:talk 1416:talk 1288:talk 1237:talk 1212:talk 1202:and 1136:and 1077:talk 1015:talk 973:talk 915:talk 873:talk 850:talk 835:talk 813:talk 799:talk 784:talk 770:talk 685:talk 590:talk 575:talk 561:talk 490:talk 450:talk 435:talk 419:talk 390:talk 367:oh, 342:talk 320:talk 305:talk 229:this 199:talk 122:talk 96:talk 3370:.-- 3140:. 3132:be 2442:air 1931:YOU 1581:BBC 1577:NPR 1569:NBC 1557:CNN 1456:. 620:Is 525:In 431:MPS 386:MPS 369:BLP 338:MPS 193:.-- 3733:Go 3713:) 3692:) 3674:) 3658:) 3621:) 3598:) 3594:• 3554:) 3540:) 3516:) 3470:) 3453:) 3433:) 3415:) 3399:) 3358:) 3334:) 3309:) 3283:💬 3266:) 3240:) 3226:- 3217:- 3208:- 3199:- 3190:- 3175:) 3099:) 3081:) 3061:) 3041:) 3037:• 3014:) 3006:-- 2997:) 2976:)| 2965:) 2961:• 2903:) 2865:) 2846:32 2825:) 2804:→ 2788:) 2784:• 2753:• 2690:-- 2668:)| 2642:) 2638:• 2593:) 2570:-- 2563:) 2523:) 2519:• 2489:) 2461:-- 2452:) 2389:) 2295:) 2281:) 2257:) 2231:) 2169:• 2127:, 2092:, 2088:, 2044:) 2029:• 1981:) 1969:, 1965:, 1961:, 1957:, 1949:, 1945:, 1910:) 1860:• 1849:). 1812:) 1797:. 1767:) 1757:15 1755:, 1753:14 1751:, 1749:13 1747:, 1745:12 1743:, 1741:11 1739:, 1737:10 1735:, 1731:, 1727:, 1723:, 1719:, 1715:, 1707:, 1703:, 1692:is 1671:, 1667:, 1663:, 1659:, 1655:, 1651:, 1647:, 1643:, 1639:, 1635:, 1631:, 1627:, 1623:, 1619:, 1615:, 1611:, 1607:, 1603:, 1599:, 1595:, 1591:, 1587:, 1583:, 1579:, 1575:, 1571:, 1567:, 1563:, 1559:, 1444:) 1418:) 1400:• 1305:. 1290:) 1239:) 1214:) 1206:.— 1177:• 1171:— 1111:" 1079:) 1064:• 1058:— 1017:) 1002:• 975:) 951:• 917:) 902:• 875:) 852:) 837:) 829:.— 815:) 801:) 786:) 772:) 764:. 698:→ 687:) 664:. 646:• 612:• 592:) 577:) 563:) 540:• 509:→ 492:) 472:• 452:) 437:) 421:) 392:) 361:→ 344:) 322:) 307:) 259:}} 253:{{ 201:) 185:, 181:, 177:, 148:, 124:) 98:) 3745:! 3709:( 3688:( 3670:( 3654:( 3617:( 3590:( 3550:( 3536:( 3512:( 3466:( 3449:( 3429:( 3411:( 3395:( 3380:W 3377:P 3374:T 3372:~ 3354:( 3330:( 3305:( 3285:| 3281:| 3262:( 3236:( 3171:( 3095:( 3077:( 3057:( 3033:( 3010:( 2993:( 2980:| 2972:( 2957:( 2899:( 2861:( 2821:( 2780:( 2672:| 2634:( 2589:( 2559:( 2515:( 2485:( 2448:( 2385:( 2291:( 2277:( 2253:( 2227:( 2136:( 2040:( 1977:( 1971:5 1967:4 1963:3 1959:2 1955:1 1951:3 1947:2 1943:1 1906:( 1896:7 1892:6 1889:5 1877:4 1873:3 1869:1 1839:) 1808:( 1763:( 1733:9 1729:8 1725:7 1721:6 1717:5 1713:4 1711:, 1709:3 1705:2 1701:1 1549:4 1547:, 1545:3 1543:, 1541:2 1539:, 1537:1 1521:7 1516:6 1512:5 1508:4 1504:3 1500:2 1496:1 1440:( 1414:( 1372:) 1286:( 1235:( 1210:( 1140:) 1075:( 1053:" 1049:" 1013:( 971:( 913:( 871:( 848:( 833:( 811:( 797:( 782:( 768:( 683:( 588:( 573:( 559:( 488:( 448:( 433:( 417:( 388:( 340:( 318:( 303:( 283:W 280:P 277:T 275:~ 241:W 238:P 235:T 233:~ 197:( 120:( 94:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index