903:
242:
384:
749:
739:
718:
284:
644:
505:
478:
515:
634:
613:
374:
450:
347:
858:
207:
316:
581:
1293:). That still doesn't mean his opinion is given undue weight because it isn't fringe or unique to him, placed in isolation just to attack the PPC. His opinion is being used to supplement a paragraph sourced throughout that describes the party as right-wing to far-right. You can't take the sentence out of its context in the article.
1299:
If we really wanted to balance out perspectives, we could add opposing or differing opinions cited by a reliable source. Maybe it'd be a good idea to expand on the sentence: "A number of political scientists have also described
Bernier's rhetoric as reminiscent of classical liberalism." Yet, it's not
1053:
has with its "left-wing" label (when the party is heavily liberal and somewhat fiscally conservative). Therefore the page includes the statement of "However In South Korea's conservative political structure, it is also called left-wing." Perhaps something could be written with regards to the PPC and
1288:
a PhD candidate? Because my reply to your original response is, sure, then let's change "political scientist" to "then PhD candidate" if we want to be really specific about his credentials instead of calling him a political scientist, scholar or columnist. Heck, let's remove labels altogether since
1152:
says the author is a "Ph.D Candidate, University of Guelph", I assume he got a PhD later but the time of writing should be what matters, so calling him a "political scientist" looks to me like credential inflation. But even if he was, why do his opinions matter? I'm calling this undue. Do others,
885:
Change "Right-wing to far-right political party in Canada" Please make some research before labeling a classical conservative, libertarian political party with a pejorative authoritarian etiquette and pick choosing hostiles tabloids is not research! Knowledge, you won't see a cent from me ever.
967:, mentioned with attribution deeper in the article, without linking. However, I have looked at the earlier threads about far-right on this talk page, and it seems to me keeping it is supported by one or more editors. So let's wait and see how much clear support exists for deleting or moving.
1236:. Budd's statement is not being stated as fact nor being cited in isolation. It is an opinion that is properly attributed and is clearly meant to supplement the paragraph describing the PPC as right-wing to far-right. His wording is unique to him but his opinion is not. And yes,
1344:
The PPC has neither seats in the House of
Commons nor the Senate, and is not His Majesty's Loyal Opposition. That would be the Conservative Party of Canada, commonly abbreviated as CPC, which is where the confusion arises I believe.
1403:
1138:". Budd argues that the party is "aimed at Canada's far right groups and supporters", who "may Bernier and the People's Party of Canada as a viable pathway to mainstreaming their xenophobic and nationalistic beliefs in Canada".
781:
153:
1187:
Sourced content being removed without explanation warrants a helpful note for new and anonymous editors so they remember to explain why. However, the same removal being done on a different account or IP without explanation
1398:
1099:
has a different idea of what certain labels mean. The only thing that matters is if reliable sources back up the interpretation you're proposing. Knowledge isn't a local free speech square; only notable POVs matter.
459:
357:
1262:. Caring what credentials he got later is like saying "When he was five, US President Joe Biden said something clever." Get it? Calling him president before he was president is (a) sometimes called
1300:
like this article doesn't give the PPC voice when it comes to describing itself; the majority of the "Principles and policies" section is a collection of statements taken from the PPC and
Bernier.
963:" in the lead sentence are The Guardian, National Observer, Toronto Star, Green Left Weekly. I'd say that they are giving a non-universal point of view and at best should be, in accordance with
1346:
147:
1134:
However, political scientist Brian Budd describes
Bernier's rhetoric and the party's platform as " the ideological tenets of a populist radical right, defined by a commitment to
1232:
Actually, I take back what I said about not supporting or opposing the removal. I do not think the reason you offered for its removal is sufficient, i.e. it does not constitute
1296:
But also, are you suggesting that "political scientist" is a label limited to scholars with PhDs in political science? This isn't prolepsis unless you set that parameter.
44:
1428:
595:
590:
488:
1360:
Ok, and? What confusion are you talking about? What specific information is incorrect? Nothing in this article claims that the PPC is His
Majesty's Loyal Opposition.
1463:
1393:
829:
819:
430:
1433:
1318:
My argument is that
Knowledge needn't publish non-notable students' opinions. So far I and the IP want Budd out, Yue wants Budd in. Anybody else have an opinion?
1448:
700:
690:
1007:). While the label fits, the connotation given by the article (Nazi & Confederate flags, facism, a variety of other hate-filled ideologies, etc.) does not.
791:
1087:
which describes the PPC in a similar manner to what you're advocating. It's worth noting that your example with the
Justice Party was pushed by a sock of
1453:
1014:) They are further right than most of the Canadian political spectrum, however not anywhere near the ideologies described on the far-right politics page.
79:
1423:
1418:
795:
571:
561:
1458:
1388:
1192:
at best indicates the editor does not care about the notice(s) and is editing at different locations, and at worst warrants a suspicion of socking.
194:
190:
1049:"The PPC is far-right within the Canadian political sphere. It could be viewed as more moderate in global politics". Somewhat similar to what the
666:
440:
1443:
1438:
1039:
Could we perhaps add a footnote to the political position in the info-box to avoid confusion with the far-right label. Such as what is on the
1408:
85:
1176:
785:
767:
723:
943:
I would expect an expert source for the categorization. Journalists are experts in what happened today, but are not political scientists.
168:
1180:
887:
777:
537:
135:
1413:
657:
618:
301:
246:
198:
1350:
406:
1017:
For me, because of what is described on the far-right page, I don't think the label fits here. "Right-wing" alone should be fine.
932:
99:
30:
1043:
info-box stating: "The RN is considered part of the radical right, a subset of the far-right that does not oppose democracy."
528:
483:
104:
20:
129:
1010:
The party's about us page describes themselves with "common sense, populism, classical conservatism, and libertarianism." (
1240:, so the label "political scientist" is fine. It took one quick search; we do not have to speculate his credentials here.
74:
922:
397:
352:
327:
292:
1149:
125:
1050:
65:
928:
297:
206:
185:
175:
1074:
948:
761:
24:
217:
1323:
1271:
1158:
1059:
1003:
Describing the PPC as "far-right" isn't so much as issue as what the
Knowledge page for "far-right" describes (
972:
1035:
Addition of a footnote to the "far-right" label to avoid/deter confusion with other (actual) far-right parties
891:
915:
864:
109:
1022:
964:
1125:
1055:
754:
333:
141:
1018:
1070:
944:
315:
1319:
1267:
1170:
1154:
968:
910:
649:
161:
55:
665:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
536:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
405:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1004:
222:
70:
51:
1141:
771:, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of
219:
1233:
1091:, who was initially topic banned for forcing this exact kind of wording. The problem with
994:
520:
738:
717:
1373:
1354:
1327:
1313:
1275:
1263:
1253:
1225:
1205:
1162:
1113:
1078:
1063:
1040:
1026:
998:
976:
952:
936:
895:
772:
514:
504:
477:
1382:
1369:
1309:
1249:
1221:
1201:
1109:
1088:
389:
1095:
a label means a certain thing for one audience and a different thing for another is
221:
1084:
986:
662:
266:
1135:
990:
744:
639:
633:
612:
510:
379:
373:
346:
1237:
1011:
960:
449:
1260:
I assume he got a PhD later but the time of writing should be what matters
1362:
1302:
1290:
1242:
1214:
1194:
1129:
1102:
533:
1069:
The citations next to "right-wing" and "far-right" seem sufficient. —
402:
1404:
Low-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
1289:
we can't verify it verbatim and we're "inflating" his credentials (
580:
1183:
across several other articles, again without proper explanations.
262:
Q1: Why is the People's Party of Canada described as "far-right"?
241:
852:
309:
278:
231:
223:
15:
1280:
So your argument then is that his inclusion is undue because
1399:
C-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
579:
448:
989:. I don't see any refs that say this is not the case. -
1210:
1145:
460:
WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada
252:
160:
1185:
I do not support or oppose the content being removed.
661:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
532:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
401:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1179:has been restoring unexplained content removals by
1211:And I wonder what their modus operandi could be...
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
174:
8:
1238:he did complete his PhD in Political Science
296:. Please read recent comments, look in the
1153:enough for a consensus, think it is good?
849:Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2022
712:
607:
472:
341:
1012:https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/about
1429:Low-importance political party articles
714:
609:
474:
343:
313:
1464:Low-importance Libertarianism articles
1394:Low-importance Canada-related articles
1133:
775:and related subjects in the Knowledge.
1434:Political parties task force articles
7:
1449:Low-importance Conservatism articles
1347:2806:101E:4:B6DB:A544:9E0D:EA93:C7B9
804:Knowledge:WikiProject Libertarianism
655:This article is within the scope of
526:This article is within the scope of
395:This article is within the scope of
807:Template:WikiProject Libertarianism
23:for discussing improvements to the
675:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism
14:
1454:WikiProject Conservatism articles
678:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
293:previous arguments being restated
1424:C-Class political party articles
1419:Low-importance politics articles
1140:The sentence was an addition by
1083:For such a change you'll need a
901:
856:
747:
737:
716:
642:
632:
611:
513:
503:
476:
382:
372:
345:
314:
282:
240:
205:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1459:C-Class Libertarianism articles
1389:C-Class Canada-related articles
824:This article has been rated as
695:This article has been rated as
566:This article has been rated as
435:This article has been rated as
546:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
332:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1444:C-Class Conservatism articles
1439:WikiProject Politics articles
669:and see a list of open tasks.
588:This article is supported by
549:Template:WikiProject Politics
540:and see a list of open tasks.
457:This article is supported by
409:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1409:All WikiProject Canada pages
1328:15:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
1314:00:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
1276:22:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
1254:20:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
1226:20:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
1206:20:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
1163:19:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
1051:Justice Party in South Korea
591:Political parties task force
415:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
1064:16:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
999:18:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
977:14:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
879:to reactivate your request.
867:has been answered. Set the
418:Template:WikiProject Canada
269:describe the party as such.
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1480:
1175:You should also note that
1114:22:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1079:19:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
959:The sources cited for "to
830:project's importance scale
768:WikiProject Libertarianism
701:project's importance scale
572:project's importance scale
441:project's importance scale
257:Frequently asked questions
1414:C-Class politics articles
1374:05:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
1355:03:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
1027:05:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
823:
732:
694:
627:
587:
565:
498:
456:
434:
367:
340:
289:Discussions on this page
265:A1: The preponderance of
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
953:04:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
937:01:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
896:01:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
762:People's Party of Canada
658:WikiProject Conservatism
25:People's Party of Canada
810:Libertarianism articles
765:is within the scope of
421:Canada-related articles
985:It is well-sourced to
584:
453:
322:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1340:Incorrect information
1054:its far-right label.
929:ScottishFinnishRadish
755:Libertarianism portal
681:Conservatism articles
583:
452:
199:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
913:for this alteration
529:WikiProject Politics
105:No original research
923:edit semi-protected
909:please establish a
650:Conservatism portal
1085:reliable source(s)
1005:Far-right politics
787:Articles Requested
585:
454:
398:WikiProject Canada
328:content assessment
304:before commenting.
295:
86:dispute resolution
47:
1146:24 September 2021
907:Not done for now:
883:
882:
844:
843:
840:
839:
836:
835:
711:
710:
707:
706:
606:
605:
602:
601:
552:politics articles
489:Political parties
471:
470:
467:
466:
308:
307:
300:, and review the
290:
277:
276:
255:
230:
229:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1471:
1367:
1307:
1258:As I explained,
1247:
1219:
1199:
1174:
1107:
926:
905:
904:
874:
870:
860:
859:
853:
812:
811:
808:
805:
802:
757:
752:
751:
750:
741:
734:
733:
728:
720:
713:
683:
682:
679:
676:
673:
652:
647:
646:
645:
636:
629:
628:
623:
615:
608:
554:
553:
550:
547:
544:
523:
518:
517:
507:
500:
499:
494:
491:
480:
473:
423:
422:
419:
416:
413:
392:
387:
386:
385:
376:
369:
368:
363:
360:
349:
342:
325:
319:
318:
310:
286:
285:
279:
267:reliable sources
245:
244:
232:
224:
210:
209:
200:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1479:
1478:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1379:
1378:
1372:
1363:
1342:
1312:
1303:
1252:
1243:
1224:
1215:
1204:
1195:
1168:
1122:
1112:
1103:
1071:Toast for Teddy
1037:
965:WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV
920:
902:
872:
868:
857:
851:
809:
806:
803:
800:
799:
798:
792:Become a Member
753:
748:
746:
726:
680:
677:
674:
671:
670:
648:
643:
641:
621:
551:
548:
545:
542:
541:
521:Politics portal
519:
512:
492:
486:
420:
417:
414:
411:
410:
388:
383:
381:
361:
355:
326:on Knowledge's
323:
283:
273:
272:
271:
270:
263:
258:
256:
226:
225:
220:
197:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1477:
1475:
1467:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1381:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1361:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1320:Peter Gulutzan
1301:
1297:
1294:
1268:Peter Gulutzan
1241:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1213:
1193:
1177:216.41.137.156
1171:Peter Gulutzan
1155:Peter Gulutzan
1132:re-inserting,
1128:removing, and
1126:216.41.137.156
1121:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1101:
1081:
1056:ZlatanSweden10
1041:National Rally
1036:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1015:
1008:
1001:
980:
979:
969:Peter Gulutzan
956:
955:
940:
939:
881:
880:
861:
850:
847:
842:
841:
838:
837:
834:
833:
826:Low-importance
822:
816:
815:
813:
801:Libertarianism
778:Template Usage
776:
773:Libertarianism
759:
758:
742:
730:
729:
727:Low‑importance
724:Libertarianism
721:
709:
708:
705:
704:
697:Low-importance
693:
687:
686:
684:
667:the discussion
654:
653:
637:
625:
624:
622:Low‑importance
616:
604:
603:
600:
599:
596:Low-importance
586:
576:
575:
568:Low-importance
564:
558:
557:
555:
538:the discussion
525:
524:
508:
496:
495:
493:Low‑importance
481:
469:
468:
465:
464:
455:
445:
444:
437:Low-importance
433:
427:
426:
424:
407:the discussion
394:
393:
377:
365:
364:
362:Low‑importance
350:
338:
337:
331:
320:
306:
305:
291:often lead to
287:
275:
274:
264:
261:
260:
259:
239:
238:
237:
235:
228:
227:
218:
216:
215:
212:
211:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1476:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1384:
1375:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1339:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1308:
1306:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1266:, (b) wrong.
1265:
1261:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1212:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1191:
1186:
1182:
1181:208.98.222.92
1178:
1172:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1151:
1150:cited article
1147:
1143:
1139:
1137:
1131:
1127:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1034:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1006:
1002:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
983:
982:
981:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
957:
954:
950:
946:
942:
941:
938:
934:
930:
924:
918:
917:
912:
908:
900:
899:
898:
897:
893:
889:
888:23.233.60.111
878:
875:parameter to
866:
862:
855:
854:
848:
846:
831:
827:
821:
818:
817:
814:
797:
793:
789:
788:
783:
782:Change Patrol
779:
774:
770:
769:
764:
763:
756:
745:
743:
740:
736:
735:
731:
725:
722:
719:
715:
702:
698:
692:
689:
688:
685:
668:
664:
660:
659:
651:
640:
638:
635:
631:
630:
626:
620:
617:
614:
610:
597:
594:(assessed as
593:
592:
582:
578:
577:
573:
569:
563:
560:
559:
556:
539:
535:
531:
530:
522:
516:
511:
509:
506:
502:
501:
497:
490:
485:
482:
479:
475:
462:
461:
451:
447:
446:
442:
438:
432:
429:
428:
425:
408:
404:
400:
399:
391:
390:Canada portal
380:
378:
375:
371:
370:
366:
359:
354:
351:
348:
344:
339:
335:
329:
321:
317:
312:
311:
303:
299:
294:
288:
281:
280:
268:
254:
251:
248:
243:
236:
234:
233:
214:
213:
208:
204:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1364:
1343:
1304:
1285:
1281:
1259:
1244:
1216:
1196:
1189:
1184:
1123:
1104:
1096:
1092:
1048:
1045:
1038:
1019:Averagebilly
914:
906:
884:
876:
865:edit request
845:
825:
796:Project Talk
786:
766:
760:
696:
672:Conservatism
663:conservatism
656:
619:Conservatism
589:
567:
527:
458:
436:
396:
334:WikiProjects
249:
202:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1282:at the time
1142:Davide King
148:free images
31:not a forum
1383:Categories
1136:xenophobia
1124:I noticed
927:template.
919:using the
869:|answered=
1264:prolepsis
961:far-right
911:consensus
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1291:MOS:PUFF
1234:WP:UNDUE
1097:everyone
1093:claiming
1089:Storm598
1046:And/or:
543:Politics
534:politics
484:Politics
358:Politics
298:archives
203:180 days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1284:he was
828:on the
699:on the
570:on the
439:on the
324:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1286:merely
1148:. The
916:before
412:Canada
403:Canada
353:Canada
330:scale.
126:Google
1190:again
991:Ahunt
987:WP:RS
873:|ans=
863:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1351:talk
1324:talk
1272:talk
1159:talk
1120:Budd
1075:talk
1060:talk
1023:talk
995:talk
973:talk
949:talk
933:talk
892:talk
253:edit
247:view
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1365:Yue
1305:Yue
1245:Yue
1217:Yue
1197:Yue
1144:on
1130:Yue
1105:Yue
945:TFD
871:or
820:Low
691:Low
562:Low
431:Low
302:FAQ
176:TWL
1385::
1370:🌙
1353:)
1326:)
1310:🌙
1274:)
1250:🌙
1222:🌙
1202:🌙
1161:)
1110:🌙
1077:)
1062:)
1025:)
997:)
975:)
951:)
935:)
925:}}
921:{{
894:)
877:no
794:•
790:•
784:•
780:•
598:).
487::
356::
201::
193:,
156:)
54:;
1349:(
1322:(
1270:(
1173::
1169:@
1157:(
1073:(
1058:(
1021:(
993:(
971:(
947:(
931:(
890:(
832:.
703:.
574:.
463:.
443:.
336:.
250:·
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
