Talk:Primark - Knowledge

2354:

Seems to me that it's a very poor attempt to place a quote into the article from "War on Want" - what evidence is there that Primark didn't take their responsibility clearly? Is Murray Worthy an expert on Primark work relations and practices? Is Primark's behaviour unusual for the clothing retail sector? Similarly, we don't use the article to overly praise Primark or report on every event that Primark was involved in. We don't list every award they've won, or we don't mention their staff raising money for Children In Need, etc, etc. It's not a company newsletter or bulletin board. Personally, I don't believe the building collapse should even be mentioned in the article - as has been pointed out, Primark didn't own the factories, had no part in running the factories, and was simply used the clothing manufacturer as a supplier. Please, could other editors weigh in with their opinions on this and lend a hand so that some sort of consensus can be reached please. --

1261:

except as a business name in Ireland - as a trade name in any country of the world, shall change all company names or titles, so as to eliminate "Penneys" therefrom, and shall never organize or acquire a business which includes this name. It shall also proceed to phase out step by step in Scotland and Northern Ireland all use of "Penneys" as a trademark, trade name or otherwise. Such phasing out shall be completed during 1978. Penney America shall cause the trademark registrations of "Power", "Quinnsworth", "Finefare", "Fine Ware" and "City Girl" to be relinquished. They acknowledge that the word "Primark" is not confusingly similar to "Penneys". While these trademark registrations and "Primark" may be used by the ABF Group, "Penneys" may be used by Penney America as a trademark and, except in Ireland, as a trade name in all countries of the world.

2527:

low paid workers manufacturing high street fashion for a variety of high street stores, and the fact that most of the links are from between 2006 and 2008 around the time the BBC made a documentary. None are relevant to this article in my opinion. They're mostly out of date. Just because Primark is mentioned as an example of a store, does not make it notable for inclusion in this article. That's pretty much my take on it. Since we disagree, there's no consensus, and we should really try to engage other editors into the discussion so that the matter can be resolved, because I don't believe we're going to resolve this between us. --

2481:? This is my point about including low-level detail that is subject to rapid change in articles. Many of the articles you inserted a mention are now out of date. So equally, other editors might take the stance that it is unwise to accept your "good intentions" to keep everything up to date. So far, it seems some "anonymous" IP editor is trying to do the job, and usually without adding a reference. My advice would be to not include any fact or figure that might need updating - that way the up-to-date facts and figures can be kept in the main article, with references. 3644:

fastest growing market for Primark. Or the most employees. Or most customers. Or whatever other measurements of "relevant" there might be - that's the point. You've chosen one method, but it's not clear why for any passing reader. But it's a small point, and I'm happy to let it go. In the beginning I just felt you hadn't understood why I had sorted alphabetically, and why "relevant" doesn't actually translate to any particular ordering. While I disagree with your reasons, it's not a big deal and hardly worth us getting in a knot over it. --

899:

them would be able to make the connection with the way they pronounce the word to the fact that the head office is in Dublin. They dont know where the head office is. The Scottish pronounce a lot of words differently to the English purely because of the difference in their accents. For example, Scottish people pronounce the world 'police' as 'polis'. The general way they sound their words is completely different in many respects.

1926: 1364: 437: 84: 288: 263: 74: 2073:) in regards to this topic. Note: I'm unwatching this page and if I was wrong here in my concerns, assessments, and or warning, I would appreciate a note on my talk page (not a page mention) telling me my mistake and I would be happy to come back and apologize set things straight. I currently do not see this as a possibility, but wanted to get that out there. I wish everyone a good day and happy editings!!! 53: 179: 158: 189: 352: 334: 22: 362: 1540:(affected|impacted|caused) Primark (in a certain way|to do something to fill the lack of supplies coming in)." have any reliable sources to cite it with? This way, the collapse could be mentioned in a way that will allow the reader to follow the link to read up on it if they chose, but not have all the extra details that I agree probably do not belong. 1601:

against something beautiful that God has given us -- the capacity to create, to work, to have dignity. How many brothers and sisters find themselves in this situation! Not paying fairly, not giving a job because you are only looking at balance sheets, only looking at how to make a profit. That goes against God!"

3303:

I think that the Nike link to sweatshops was very notable and received extensive coverage in news reports, books and even documentaries. In those reports, the focus was about Nike (and not the sweatshops per se), and therefore Nike wasn't a tangential mention, and the event was notable. I don't see

2526:

New Worl, you originally edited this article to insert a mention of the Savar incident. You've posted about 12 links which *you* say are relevant, but the only common thread are lots of pretty sensational and potentially libelous statements from "War on Want" (a tiny charity that tackles "poverty"),

2505:

The normal way of discussing something is sequential, so that the timeline of discussion is preserved, and other editors can see how a discussion progressed. New worl, your style of starting multiple discussions in several sections just doesn't work. Can you please, in future, sequentially add your

2353:

to continue to add to this article after the discussion above. If you want to add something in that is potentially libelous, please get agreement here first. For example, what exactly is the relevance to the story that protesters surrounded a Primark store on Oxford street? One store? Out of 256?

2060:

should do the trick for you... I consider them all to be fair and non-bias people. Before you claim that they are all my friends or whatnot, I'll inform you them most of them were involved in my (un)blocking a month and a half ago. Most of them are administrators, and most of them denied my unblock

981:

If it was meant to be pronounced 'Preemark' then would the spelling not be Pree or Prea. Pri is usually pronounced /aɪ/ as in Prime or /ɪ/ as in Primitive. The word Primary is only one letter different from the word Primark and Primary is pronounced /aɪ/. I was told that the actually pronunciation is

818:

All workers in their associated factories are paid a living wage that as a bare minimum covers all their basic needs and are consistent with local wage laws. All associated factory are paid the equivalent of at least the UK minimum wage in their country. Primark has deals with factories in Madrid and

777:

in regards to floor space the Manchester store is the biggest in the company having 100,000 sq ft but originally Oxford Street waa the biggest when opened, Manchester took the position when TK Maxx relocated giving Primark the full building. Advertising is only fairly new within Primark, when opening

3181:

I don't know if you are being deliberately obtuse, or if you just fail to see the point. Once again. We don't metion the employees because there's nothing notable or relevant to this article in doing that. Similarly, we don't mention the people that clean the offices or wash windows or supply the

3152:

You're missing the point. We don't mention the employees because there's nothing notable or relevant to this article about them. Sure, we could. We chose not to. Perhaps in the future something notable and relevant will cause someone to add to this article, but it hasn't happened yet. The point

3026:

Fact 2006 is the cause of 'In 2006, Primark joined the Ethical Trading Initiative, a collaborative organization bringing together businesses, trades unions and NGOs to work on labour rights issues in their supply chains' (quoted in the article) The article cannot omit the reason of Primark's join in

2684:

2091:

misunderstood what you were saying and took it as a threat, then saying "If you did that you would be blocked", and I can see why if that's what you meant. While I know it's not, I wouldn't interpret that as harassment or a threat, just trying to tell you that you would be blocked if you kept making

1146:

Removing:"2009 primark are planning to make verious adverts on televison. They have recently said that they do make children make their clothes" Don't Know Whether It's Just Bad Spelling Or Just Completely False. And I Sincerely Doubt The Second Part. Give Me A Source, I Might Believe It. Until Then

3531:

This is getting silly. Please point out where I made a claim that what you said was libelous. And again, I can't decide if you are being deliberately obtuse or if this is your normal interaction style. Let me be clear. A claim made by a spokesperson for "War on Want" directly blames Primark for

3481:

That's twice you've said I need to watch my language. Please inform me what exactly you find offensive to you because it's becoming very clear to me that by adding handpicked quotes and links to articles, you are attempting to link responsibility with Primark and other companies to this incident.

1647:

Your comment of "I can see a bigger picture here" worries me. Knowledge isn't a news channel, or a mechanism for publicizing a particular point of view. For example, the pope comment isn't relevant to the Primark article, because the pope doesn't mention Primark. So why bring it up? Adding this

1260:

5. On 26 February 1976, to settle their pending litigations and proceedings, Penney America and the ABF Group entered into the notified agreement, which became effective on 27 August 1976 (the operative date) and which is outlined below. (a) The ABF Group shall not use "Penneys" as a trademark or -

1003:

I genuinely can't believe anyone with half a brain cell would pronounce it "pree-mark". It's ridiculous. In Scotland, the education level before secondary/high school is not "pree-mary" school, its "pry-mary" school, spelled, yes, you guessed it "Primary". This pronunciation is prevalent throughout

908:

nope sorry your wrong, neds pronounce 'police' as 'polis', polis is just wrong, nothing to do with accent. the point i was trying to make is if the staff in scotland pronounce it preemark, then the customers are going to do the same. "The general way they sound their words is completely different

898:

I would say this was purely down to the accents of the Scottish and the Irish to be honest rather than it having anything to do with where the head office is based. My Husband and all his family are Scottish and all pronounce it 'preemark' but if u asked them why they pronounce in that way none of

2952:

Believe me, I've been very patient with you. But AGF only takes you so far - after that, the actions and comments of other editors become clear. I cannot think of any other reason why you would directly ask an editor, who disagreed with you, to make a disclaimer statement. In all my years, I've

2763:

You also state above that the article should mention the people who make the products. Why? We don't mention the employees, or their working conditions or pension arrangements. Why should the article mention people who don't even work for Primark? Or how would you suggest we limit the external

1521:

It's a tragic event, and has it's own article, but it is only tangentially related to the companies that were the customers of the factories. The factories were independently owned. Note that originally this was tacked into the "Criticisms" section (and still is in "criticisms" sections in other

1505:

the factory did not solely supply Primark - it was an 8 storey building that housed many different factories, shops and a bank. The various factories producted items for a range of customers including the Benetton Group, Joe Fresh, The Children's Place, Primark, Monsoon, and DressBarn. (New worl

681:

Departments and codes: 1=Accessories. 2=Socks and Tights. 3=NOT USED. 4=Womens Apparel. 5=Childrens Wear. 6=Mens Wear. 7=Shoes. 8=Womens Wear. 9=Special deals / Reduced Clothing. 11=Homeware 23/24=Xmas Shop 26=Sportswear 27=Todlerswear Pay: Standard wage for Sales Assistants. £3.69 per hour (under

3053:

This was answered already above. Those workers were not employed by Primark, but by a supplier. It simply giving Undue Weight to mention a supplier's workers without potentially mentioning others as well, etc. You were already told this in the Pope Francis article. If you want to grind an axe

2893:

and judge on actions and edits. But I really really don't like the tone and insinuation behind your "innocent" request. So please don't try to look for reasons to somehow devalue another editors contributions by suggesting that the editor may have an agenda. It's in poor taste, and fishing for

677:

How it works: Each section (or department) runs the operational side of the business. The (tactical) floor manager selects the stock that should be ordered and placed on the shop floor. The manager (strategic) controls the local shop, unlike other companies franchise system. The manager remain in

3643:

I agree in so far as the policy states only recommended relevant websites should be included. It says nothing about what order they should be added. So how do we define "relevant" - that's the point at issue. It could be the greatest number of stores. Or the highest revenue by country. Or the

3270:

Note how these are separate articles. If you want to set up a "Criticism of Primark" article, then that would be a good place to write about various work practices (so long as its sourced, etc). But they don't belong in the main article for an incident where the connection is that Primark did

1881:

My comment was in regard to the fact that his wording made me think that he was upset about something, was going to Google every possible piece of unreliable blog stuffs he could find and spam the crap out of the article with useless information. I simply wanted to make clear that would not be

1600:

spoke out against the working conditions in the factory: :"A headline that really struck me on the day of the tragedy in Bangladesh was 'Living on 38 euros a month'. That is what the people who died were being paid. This is called slave labour. Today in the world this slavery is being committed

928:

I remember a Christmas TV advertising campaign on Ulster TV during the eighties with the slogan "Primark, got a whole lotta things for Christmas, got a lot for the family" - it was definitly pronouned 'pree-mark' back then, however i have family in liverpool who insist on calling it 'pry-mark'.

1562:

articles states "Primark has been working with other retailers to review the country's approach to factory standards and will now push for this review to include building integrity". That's about the only Primark relevant discussions in *all* the articles. It's an event, for sure, but in my

1238:

Definetly in Mary Street, Dublin, this was even stated on the BBC Panorama programme on the company. This may change since Arthur Ryan is retiring. As for the Penneys/Primark, its just a different name. The chain was owned from the very beginning by ABF and originally called Penney's. The name

1101:

Is this section necessary? Is it of any interest to anyone except employees? There is nothing remarkable or significantly different compared to other retailers, and I have looked at other retailer's articles and none seem to have details regarding staff pay and low level management structure.

647:

by someone else - I'd support, Penneys and Primark are one and the same, even the logo is the same, only the logotype is different. They offer the same proposition and services. Penneys actually predates Primark, however since Primark is their corporate name (the Penneys stores have "Penneys -

3398:

What's the title of the article? Is Primark or Monsoon the focus of the article, with detailed reporting and maybe some facts and figures? Has an investigation been carried out? Or (in the interests of NPOV) is it simply a reporter adding big names to an article to generate some sensational

2725:

addition you with to make to the article? Note that adding a bunch of facts isn't the role of the Knowledge article. As I've said above, we don't make a note of a "fact" every time the work "Primark" hits a news article or is mentioned on the TV. This isn't the company bulletin board.

932:

That advert campaign (with the slogan "Penny's, got a whole lotta things..." etc) has ran every Christmas in living memory in the Irish media, until very recently. Incidently, the Primark name was apparently invented due to the company's inabillity to use Penny's outside of Ireland due to

2410:

That's the problem with spreading the same data into different articles - nobody bothers to update all the articles later. I see the death toll is now over 600 for example. Who will update all the articles with correct death tolls? Is it not better to simply wikilink to the main

2611: 1648:

into "Criticism" sections shows that you are looking at this incident with a POV which includes associating Primark with the low wages and dangerous working conditions. Unless you can find sources to back up your view (and they meet the criteria for sources), the rest is simply

2767:

BTW, you appear to misunderstand NPOV - that policy is to ensure that articles don't take sides. You say it is against policy (NPOV) to *not* mention these facts. I disagree, and what's more, your attempt to link Primark with responsibility for the incident is unsourced, is

3467:, said: ‘We’re here to send a clear message to Primark that the 300 deaths in the Bangladesh building collapse were not an accident – they were entirely preventable deaths. If Primark had taken its responsibility to those workers seriously, no one need have died this week.’ 2414:

Usually when disagreements break out on articles, it is best to simply stop editing the article until consensus can be reached. Mixing controversial edits with fixups isn't recommended because the whole lot is liable to get reverted, especially when the edits are mixed in

823:"All associated factory are paid" - should it say, "All associated factory workers"? Also: in the paragraph before, it quotes Geoff Lancaster talking about raising standards in Bangladesh - which appears to contradict the final sentence above. Can anyone make this clearer? 2764:

people that should be mentioned? Should we mention the people who work for the company that write the software that runs their computer systems? Or perhaps we should also mention the person that works for the cleaning contractor that cleans their stores in Spain?

3669:) and none include official sites to different languages so I've decided to remove them, We both definitely agree that warring over this is stupid, Anyway If you want to revert me then feel free as I think we both have different definitions of "relevant" ... 3532:

the loss of life. No evidence at all - they're still pulling bodies from the rubble - and *you* want to include the direct quote in an article? That statement is potentially libelous, and if you think I'm being unreasonable, go ask someone else. --

2789:

New worl - you were told previously that it's not a good idea to edit other people's comments. That includes interspersing your responses with another editor's comment. Can you sort the mess you've made above out to separate your response please.

3772:

Note: The bit about sweatshops says "Several companies refused to sign, including Walmart, Carrefour, Bonmarché, Mango, Auchan and Kik. The agreement was signed by Primark, Loblaw, Bonmarche and El Corte Inglés." So did Bonmarche sign or not?

875:

It is noted in the Trivia that Primark is pronounced "Pree-mark" in NI, but "Pry-mark" in Great Britain. When I lived in Glasgow everyone said "Pree-mark." Is this just a Glasgow thing, or should the trivia be changed to "Pree-mark" in NI

1223:

Are the headquarters definitely in Ireland? I can find no reference on the Primark, now the ABF website confirming this. Pennys may have started in Ireland, but where does Primark come in? Was it a merger or take-over or just a different

2953:

never seen that. I think it's a pretty sneaky tactic and my advice to you is not to try it on again. If that is a "bad adjective", feel free to complain. Or better still, explain why you requested a disclaimer in the first place. --

713:

to local newspapers as new stores have opened. A major exception to this is their Christmas advertising campaign, which has run on radio each Christmas (and occasionally on Irish television). In contrast to their main competitors,

763:

Seems to be a couple of contradictions in the article about advertising, with one section saying they do not advertise, and another saying that they do... Also the largest store in this article claims to be Manchester, but in the

3233:

Excellent, you agree that "external people" are not relevant. Can we now also agree that the "external people" working for other companies, supplying goods and services are also not relevant, even if a tragic incident occurs?

2061:

requests. Now that I'm satisfied that you will have ample other opinions to settle your dispute, I'm stepping away from this article. I've been as neutral as can be (I'd never heard of Primark before now being whereas I'm a

3054:

about poor conditions, take it somewhere else. We don't use articles for soapboxing. Also, if you have a good reference providing the reasons why Primark joined, I think that could be mentioned if it is deemed relevant. --

2970:

1/ You said that I am 'trying to do some Original Research to somehow continue to link Primark with the Savar incident'. You said that " attempting to link responsibility with Primark and other companies to this incident",

1431:, housing some 3000 workers collapsed, causing the deaths more than 400 people. Primark is one of the recipients of clothing made at the factory. The part of the factory making clothes for Primark was on the second floor. 3969: 3711:

I'd say, but they also don't list country specific websites. Happy to go with something that makes sense, and unless and until another editor joins the discussion with a different viewpoint, I'm happy to go with yours.

1042:"It is also Reilly Marshalls (of Nottingham) favourite shop, it is reported that he once spent an astonishing £11 there in one go. He purchased ten shirts, six pairs of socks, twelve t shirts and three pairs of jeans" 1696:" it had some citable impact on Primark as my suggestion above says. The pope has nothing to do about this discussion, slavery and whatnot doesn't belong in this discussion either. Let's stay on topic New worl... 985:

Why does the pronounciation section have "Northern Ireland, Ireland" listed? It should be Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, or in this case, seen as it is a whole island thing, just "Ireland." Am I

3788:

I have had a look at the reference and cannot make out which is meant. We just reflect what the reference says - confusing as it is. May need a better reference that gives a clearer statement of the position.

2715:

Let's not prepare the "why" and "why not" format because it calls for responses interspersed with your comments, and this isn't the best format for wikipedia where individual comments would no longer be kept

748:

It may be - I have started working in a flagship Primark store, and the above statement is more or less true; the HR person who finished off the induction said almost the same thing as the above statement.

3776:

Strange and inappropriate that so much of this article focuses on overseas labour issues. It distorts the whole article and comes across as politically motivated. I'll wait for comments before editing

778:

a new store there is local coverage but on a whole the company doesn't really have advertising. Penneys have a christmas advert and a jingle which is well known in Ireland but unheard of in England.

455: 558: 1817:

and let an administrator figure out what your comment above implies. I can also tell you that if I was an administrator on this wiki, I would likely consider that a threat and you would end up

1516:. Primark does get a mention, especially in British press (gives it a British angle - same press wouldn't mention Joe Fresh or Benneton in the article, whereas in the US press it's vice versa). 918:

I live near Birmingham, and most people I know say "Pree-mark". Honestly, this is the first time I've ever read that British/English people say "Pry-mark". In my experience, they just don't.

1180:

I have just uploaded the new logo, I had a few problems with the uploading because Knowledge keeps thinking it's a duplicate, I have now also included a Non Free rationale on the logo page.

3970:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160709093857/https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/%E2%80%98cry-help%E2%80%99-prisoner-chinese-forced-labour-jail-alleged-have-been-found-inside-primark

3959: 925:

I live near Edingbrugh, and we call Primark Pree-mark. In england they call it Pry-mark and in Ireland they call it Penneys. Honestly just stick to the one name. MON/30/03/09 18:13PM

846:

I removed a comment left by someone: "Its totally fabulous for lil cheapie bargains and you can customize them and if you go wrong it doesnt really matter beacause they are so cheap!"

2567: 2339: 2418:

But thank you for not reverting all your edits again. Have you had a chance to understand (not necessarily agree) why I object to mentioning the tragic incident in the article? --

3973: 3482:

Otherwise, please explain why you have chosen the quote above which states "If Primark had taken its responsibility to those workers seriously, no one need have died this week.".

2974:

2/ You even questioned an anonymous by using " " and discredited his support. Your words: "anonymous" IP editor is trying to do the job, and usually without adding a reference.

1962:'s words such as 'going to Google every possible piece of unreliable blog stuffs he could find and spam the crap out of the article with useless information' and his post here 2870:

HighKing, as a long term (since January 2009) and most contributed editor (51 v. 27 edits of 2nd most) in this article, is that O.K. for you to provide some disclaimer? Best,

603:

Jervis Street. They were an anchor tenant there when it opened, although I actually think thats closed down again by now - I can't remember seeing it last time I was there. --

4209: 889:

no you are right, in scotland it is pronounced preemark, probably due to the fact that the scottish head office is in dublin and is not the same as the english head office

3489:) and it certainly doesn't grant factual status (or lessen the potential libellous nature) to any comments to a spokesperson for a fringe organization like War on Want. -- 2129:

and stopped there by just saying nicely "I am not happy with words such as ' every possible piece of unreliable blog stuffs', 'spam the crap', 'useless information'. Best,"

3949: 3607:

If Primark has more stores in IRE/UK then in Germany, It makes more sense to list IRE/UK first? Plus Primark was founded in IRE so again they should have more priority,

1567:

article listing the various retailers that used these companies as suppliers, but it's not necessary to list the building collapse in each article on each retailer. --

2506:

responses to the bottom of the current discussion. Do not edit others comments (although you can cut and paste to respond. And try to keep it short as possible. --

1502:

Hi. I've updated the paragraph to better reflect the noteworthy elements of the link between Primark and the collapse of the building. To answer your questions:

4111: 4107: 4093: 4001: 3997: 3983: 3861: 3857: 3843: 3182:

computer systems, etc. And that's the same relationship that the workers making clothes has with Primark. As you've been already told, mentioning them would be

3703:

Most(?) chains choose to not operate their own stores in multiple European countries - at best they'll grant a franchise. More relevant would be something like

2238:

provided a long list of people you might ask for third opinions. While I'm sure we all despise child labor or the working conditions in Bangladesh, Knowledge is

2484:

So back to the question I posed. Have we any sort of agreement or consensus about the article? And the other articles you added a mention of the incident? --

2319:

shows some of India's poorest people, including children, working long, gruelling hours for poverty pay on Primark clothes in slum workshops and refugee camps.

4234: 408: 2982:

So I must protect myself, I need to let other editors know that I do not have personal interest here at all. A disclaimer would be perfect for that purpose.

1629: 1522:

articles). How can it be a "criticism"? That is potentially libellous, inferring that these companies had some part or fault in the building collapse. --

3440:

I disagree, and what's more, your attempt to link Primark with responsibility for the incident is unsourced, is original research and potentially libelous.

494: 481: 768:

article it claims to be there. I have never been to either of these stores, or seen any advertising, so am not really in a position to correct it myself.

2175: 1986: 414: 4079: 3960:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160325223918/http://www.dhakatribune.com/business/2013/nov/17/buyers%e2%80%99-compensation-rana-plaza-victims-far-reality

2646: 2642: 2638: 2335: 1257:

for an authoritative account. Most relevant fragment below. Anyone up for updating the article as appropriate (ideally creating a 'history' section)?

1596:

is a good approach. I can see a bigger picture there, more than a building collapse. I think the Pope have a part of a big picture here: On 1st May,

4224: 4204: 2602: 245: 235: 140: 130: 2566:

Facts in 2006 (to be added): In December 2006 investigators find sweatshops in Bangladesh where workers are making Primark clothes for 5p an hour.

4239: 3939: 665:

I'm not sure the information contained there has any place in an encylopedia, but I've moved it here in case somebody wants to put it back in.

4214: 3974:

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/%E2%80%98cry-help%E2%80%99-prisoner-chinese-forced-labour-jail-alleged-have-been-found-inside-primark

3963: 682:

18) £4.92 (£5.55 with London weighting) per hour (over 18) No paid breaks or lunches Overtime is standard rate Biometric hand system installed

2629: 2242:

to be used for advocacy. We should not base significant amounts of content solely on advocacy organizations and discredited (!) news reports.

2320: 1268: 3463:

store on Oxford Street in the City of Westminster in the West End of London. Speaking outside the store, Murray Worthy, from campaign group

3777: 967: 785: 468: 384: 3146: 1021: 947: 804:

I have had a go at tidying it up, but there is still loads to do. Comments on my alterations would help me as I am fairly new to this--

739:

don't think that its sourcable. Can't imagine any company not marketing itself in one way or another - If its important please discuss

629: 488: 2650: 1977:('I can also tell you that if I was an administrator on this wiki, I would likely consider that a threat and you would end up blocked') 3950:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090302054854/http://waronwant.org/campaigns/supermarkets/fashion-victims/inform/16360-fashion-victims-ii

3570: 1127:

I agree - this is a Knowledge page, not Primark's corporate website. If no one has objected within a week I will remove this section.

987: 211: 106: 2092:

threats like that. While it may be a bit BITEy, I believe it was perfectly appropriate given the circumstances. Just my view though.

1563:

opinion it simply doesn't meet the criteria to mention it at all in the articles on the various retailers. I've no problem with the

1004:

the English language. One idiot pronouncing a work wrong should not warrant a nation doing it or we will all end up talking nonsense!

4229: 4219: 4199: 4089:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

3979:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

3839:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1945: 1383: 856: 3019:

different types of stores(1), number of locations(2), dates of first openings in every countries(3), how large stores are(4), etc.

2674:

different types of stores(1), number of locations(2), dates of first openings in every countries(3), how large stores are(4), etc.

1900:

I am not happy with words such as ' every possible piece of unreliable blog stuffs', 'spam the crap', 'useless information'. Best,

3953: 2985:

It's all up to you. That's why I said 'is that OK'. I am not you and I would not link that question with anything at all. Cheers,

2316: 1692:

is very important here, I agree. I also think that in regards to the original question, that the collapsed should be mentioned "

1087: 946:

I have only ever heard the word pronounced with primary stress on the first syllable, ie /'pɹaɪmɑːk/ or /'pɹiːmɑːk/, et cetera.

2750: 2679: 2167: 2103: 1993: 1329: 1117: 375: 339: 294: 268: 1396:

I disagree with your two sentences. We can count how many articles in just The Guardian about both Primark and the incident.

2204:

are referenced through the citation of reliable published sources, so as to maintain a standard of verifiability (quote from

1778:

You have been with Knowledge longer than I am and I thought you know more about Knowledge values, pillars, etc. than I do...

1617: 549: 3453: 1345:

This is an event with a tangential connection with Primark at best. It shouldn't be mentioned in the Primark article. --

202: 163: 97: 58: 4154: 4044: 3904: 2856: 2572:

Facts in 2008 (to be added): In June 2008 Panorama finds 9 year olds working on Primark clothes in India for 60p a day.

2551:

I propose some additions. First I have two. I also prepare the format of 'why' and 'why not'. Please add your comments.

2474: 1593: 1564: 1537: 1513: 1420: 1313:

The total number of stores primark now has is up to 232 due to opening new stores in the united kingdom (bexleyheath).

462: 449: 33: 3044: 1666:

Are you sure that you don't see any link between the image and 'Living on 38 euros a month'? Do you see the image yet?

3829: 2620: 1728: 475: 4080:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150502100506/http://www.abf.co.uk/responsibility/our-actions/primark_ethical_trade_team

3511:

1. Can you count again how many times I said so? And can you count how many times you said 'libelous' or 'libellous'?

3084:

said that 'If there is additional coverage of statements made about workers rights, it might warrant a subsection...'

1688:

HighKing and New worl, I'm marking this as "helped" now and will continue watching it and commenting where needed.

2288: 1752: 2304: 1272: 1254: 648:

Operated by Primark" on their packaging) I would suggest leaving it at this location with a redirect at Penneys.

4110:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

4000:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3860:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2593: 3781: 2025: 2020:

Hello New worl! I'm going to help you out here and get you the help you requested. Let me echo a few people.

1152: 3940:

https://web.archive.org/web/20071008102159/http://www.ethicaltrade.org/Z/lib/2006/05/primark-press/index.shtml

1488:

Let's start with those questions and see if we can't find out whether or not it should really be in there. :)

971: 789: 4083: 1053: 951: 753:

In any case, it has advertised on UK Television, although possibly only Northern Ireland, not Great Britain.

4145: 4071: 4035: 3964:

http://www.dhakatribune.com/business/2013/nov/17/buyers%E2%80%99-compensation-rana-plaza-victims-far-reality

3931: 3895: 3821: 3249: 3215: 3135: 3088: 2665: 2625: 2121:

very much for your opinion. I agree with you that at first there was a misunderstanding. I took advice from

2057: 1025: 633: 960:

Well, I'm in Wigan, and it's always Pry-mark. If someone said 'Preemark' they would get very funny looks.

860: 4067: 3927: 3574: 2078: 1891: 1826: 1701: 1545: 1493: 1229: 1166: 1132: 1079: 1047: 991: 521: 3514:

2. Do you read Knowledge definition for 'libelous' before using such word many times against editor here?

2721:

It is impossible to answer your questions as you've posed them, so lets step back a little. What is the

1325: 982:

prɪmahrk but due to certain accents in Ireland it was often mispronounced with an ee sound instead of ɪ.

919: 4129:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

4117: 4019:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

4007: 3879:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3867: 3399:

coverage? Also, do I take it (seeing as this article is from 2010) that you're still trying to do some

2885:

I think what you're trying to do, in a roundabout way, is ask if I have a possible conflict of interest

2758:. The facts should be included as soon as possible to preserve (at least) one of five Knowledge pillars. 1872: 1296: 910: 833: 824: 723: 686: 501: 39: 4070:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3930:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3820:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3380: 3099: 2889:

in editing this article. Rest assured, I don't. BTW, your disclaimer isn't necessary. We all try to

2349:

due to selective sourcing to sensationalize the notion that Primark endorses slave labour. It is very

1010:

Their Christmas TV and radio advertising jingle in 1980s did indeed pronounce the name as 'Pree-mark'

754: 594: 3943: 1783:

Sweatshops' & Primark' for you so that all editors can have more resources to improve the article.

726:

in the UK, and there is evidence that most of Primark's customers first heard about the store through

3566: 3187: 2607: 2163: 1974: 1970: 1605: 1559: 1317: 1264: 1105: 1017: 963: 881: 852: 781: 625: 299: 273: 3102:

stated that 'Primark and Monsoon, have been caught up in recent exposés of labour practices through

2589: 2470: 1321: 21: 4181: 3746: 3689: 3628: 2598: 2376:, you reverted at least two edits without understanding how such edits help improving the article: 2126: 2098: 2000: 1757: 1148: 1113: 890: 769: 3375:

How about 'Primark and Monsoon, have been caught up in recent exposés of labour practices through

3304:

the same criteria with your linking of Primark and other retailers with the building collapse. --

3125: 383:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

210:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

105:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3717: 3649: 3598: 3537: 3522: 3494: 3472: 3422: 3408: 3388: 3359: 3323: 3309: 3294: 3276: 3261: 3239: 3223: 3195: 3172: 3158: 3142: 3111: 3059: 3040: 3032: 2990: 2958: 2943: 2921: 2899: 2875: 2813: 2795: 2777: 2731: 2690: 2678:

about people who make the products, how they are treated, how they are paid. It's a violation of

2556: 2532: 2511: 2489: 2460: 2423: 2398: 2359: 2265: 2213: 2183: 2171: 2143: 2045: 2010: 1980: 1963: 1949: 1905: 1844: 1800: 1793: 1671: 1657: 1637: 1613: 1572: 1527: 1461: 1404: 1387: 1350: 1209: 909:

in many respects" and generally correct! the english cannot (or do not) pronounce 'wh' 'aw' 'r'

4114:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

4004:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3864:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2573: 2323: 604: 4130: 4020: 3954:

http://www.waronwant.org/campaigns/supermarkets/fashion-victims/inform/16360-fashion-victims-ii

3880: 3517:

3. I use that quote because I need to protect myself against your 'libelous' claim against me.

3485:

And just because "The Guardian" reports on an event, it doesn't make the event notable (as per

1056:. Its prounounced Pre-mark as in 'pre-mark-up' prices hence the low end pricing of merchandise 3794: 3081: 3077: 2380:

1st edit by 180.234.93.156, updating the death toll from 501 to 550 in the building collapse:

2257: 2239: 2235: 2088: 2074: 2066: 1959: 1887: 1836: 1822: 1697: 1589: 1541: 1489: 1441: 1240: 1225: 1162: 1128: 938: 669: 652: 1161:

Are you really criticising someone's spelling before capitalising every word in your post???

3666: 2122: 2053: 2037: 2033: 1932: 1883: 1868: 1863:; he was going to Google whatever subject you guys are talking about to provide information 1810: 1536:

Are there any reports of Primark being impacted by this? Would a single sentence like "The

1370: 1292: 1185: 507: 367: 4137: 4027: 3887: 3609:

On another note I've never seen an alphabetical list on here in the 3yrs I've been here...

3486: 3183: 2748:

They are not simple facts. Without such facts, this article is a very good example of how

2634: 2350: 2205: 2029: 1867:

HighKing. No comment on the underlying issue, I'm just passing thru from the help desk. --

1818: 900: 538: 3603:

A bulleted list of recommended relevant websites, each accompanied by a short description

3126:

Re. 'We don't mention the employees, or their working conditions or pension arrangements'

2014: 1830: 4174: 4096:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3986:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3846:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3730: 3673: 3612: 2916:

for me? Do I do the same for you? No. Not to mention that I am a new comer here. Best,

2247: 2118: 2093: 2041: 1814: 1689: 1483:

How much coverage did Primark get in the article covering the story about the collapse?

1109: 514: 436: 194: 89: 4136:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

4026:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3886:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1839:. I didn't mean so. English is not my mother tongue. I will change my sentence. Best, 4193: 3713: 3645: 3591: 3533: 3518: 3490: 3468: 3418: 3404: 3384: 3355: 3319: 3305: 3290: 3272: 3257: 3235: 3219: 3191: 3168: 3154: 3138: 3107: 3055: 3036: 3028: 2986: 2954: 2939: 2935: 2917: 2895: 2890: 2886: 2871: 2828: 2809: 2791: 2773: 2727: 2686: 2552: 2528: 2507: 2485: 2456: 2419: 2394: 2373: 2355: 2261: 2209: 2179: 2006: 1901: 1840: 1806: 1667: 1653: 1633: 1609: 1568: 1558:

reports that Primark (and Loblaw) said they will be offering aid to the victims, and

1523: 1457: 1453: 1400: 1346: 1244: 1205: 1065: 805: 765: 727: 710: 3830:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110618132300/http://www.primarkresponse.com/panorama/

3790: 3658:

Good point .... I meant as in it being relevant store wise as well as founded wise,

3596:

As far as I'm aware Article links go by most relevant, Not in alphabetical order...

3400: 2769: 2585: 2346: 2021: 1649: 1597: 1925: 1509:

It is not the only factory. Primark has many many suppliers throughout the world.

1363: 1555: 4103: 3993: 3853: 3464: 2722: 2616: 2049: 1181: 740: 706: 3392: 3227: 832:

I changed this whole section as it was both unsourced and factually incorrect.

287: 262: 178: 157: 4102:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3992:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3852:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3351: 3286: 3253: 3092: 2590:

link 3 (An 80-hour week for 5p an hour: the real price of high-street fashion)

1428: 1255:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31978D0193:EN:HTML

1011: 357: 184: 79: 73: 52: 678:

control of the store and can function independently from other local chains.

3662: 3023:

about people who make the products, how they are treated, how they are paid.

2478: 2243: 1201: 3833: 2338:

finds child labourers in Bangladesh making Primark clothes for 3p an hour.

1729:"Dhaka: many dead as garment factory building that supplied west collapses" 1239:"Primark" allegedly came about due to fear of litigation from J.C. Penney. 705:

This reputation has come about despite the company spending very little on

4084:

http://www.abf.co.uk/responsibility/our-actions/primark_ethical_trade_team

2842: 2808:

I also added sub-headings so that all editors can follow the talk easily.

1414:

Hello. I'm assuming that the below blockquote is the content in question?

4170: 2299: 934: 3578: 3476: 3318:

Which books, which documentaries? Do you know how to cite your sources?

1992:

And could you please tell me if his participation in the talk is really

4063: 3923: 3813: 3460: 3417:

I don't understand what you mean by the last sentence. Please explain.

3167:

Then don't use such subjects in your argument. They will weaken yours.

2062: 715: 644: 615: 380: 351: 333: 207: 102: 3271:

business with one of the companies in the building that collapsed. --

3006: 2162:.". That's why I asked for help to see if any of these are violated: 1753:

Pope Francis Condemns 'Slave Labor' In Bangladesh: 'Goes Against God'

3944:

http://www.ethicaltrade.org/Z/lib/2006/05/primark-press/index.shtml

3007:

Is article's current version a very good example of NPOV violation?

2345:

I've reverted your additions. It seems to me that it is very much

1859:

Technical13, I'm sure he didn't mean he was going to try to Google

3704: 2643:

link 10 (Primark faces demonstration after child labour TV exposé)

1424: 3452:. I did not attempt to link anything. The following info is from 3130:

Answer: A very easy task for you because you edited this article

2831:

is a normal and neutral editor. I and my family have never ever:

2805:

HighKing, could you please focus on one main point per paragraph?

3708: 3403:

to somehow continue to link Primark with the Savar incident? --

2647:

link 11 (British retailers sell cheap clothes as workers suffer)

1809:

and or whom it may be directed at. What I can tell you is that

719: 2894:

private information is seen in poor taste and frowned upon. --

2639:

link 9 (Primark faces new claims that it uses sweatshop labour)

2603:

link 5 (Engaging the high street is the way to ethical clothes)

4185: 4159: 4049: 3909: 3798: 3755: 3721: 3698: 3653: 3637: 3541: 3526: 3498: 3426: 3412: 3363: 3327: 3313: 3298: 3280: 3265: 3243: 3199: 3176: 3162: 3115: 3063: 2994: 2962: 2947: 2925: 2903: 2879: 2817: 2799: 2781: 2735: 2694: 2560: 2536: 2515: 2493: 2464: 2427: 2402: 2363: 2269: 2251: 2217: 2187: 2108: 2082: 2070: 1920: 1909: 1895: 1876: 1848: 1705: 1675: 1661: 1641: 1621: 1592:

for your volunteer support. I agree that going to the article

1576: 1549: 1531: 1497: 1465: 1408: 1358: 1354: 1333: 1300: 1276: 1248: 1233: 1213: 1189: 1170: 1156: 1136: 1121: 1068: 1029: 995: 975: 955: 941: 922: 913: 903: 893: 884: 864: 836: 827: 808: 793: 772: 757: 743: 689: 672: 655: 637: 607: 597: 15: 1044:

from the article, why is this article so prone to vandalism?

456:

Knowledge:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies

2386:

2nd by me, providing clear explanation (link not found, +):

593:

AKAIK, BHS never is one of the ex-BHS sites, incidently. --

2260:

and I say 'peace' now for the better of Knowledge. Cheers,

1399:

Anyway I put up a tag to ask for third opinion here. Best,

4074:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

3934:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

3824:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1200:

The article differs from the "Company Profile" section on

1480:

Is it the "only" factory that makes clothing for Primark?

2444:

to update all the articles later' and then you reverted

3817: 3134:: Provide articles about Primark's employees that meet 2863: 2455:

I cannot accept your explanation for the two reverses.

2445: 2387: 2381: 2201: 2139: 1937: 1375: 685:

here pay is £3.83 under 18, £4.99 over 18, no overtime

819:

Vietnam and do not manufacture clothing in Bangladesh.

2967:

Because you clearly have had bad assumptions for me.

1554:

There are no reports of Primark being impacted - but

3153:

isn't about verifiability, it's about relevance. --

3095:

to have a simple but eye-opening experience for you.

2862:

I made the first edit in this article on 2 May 2013

2651:

link 12 (The real cost of fashion: a special report)

1805:

I'm not sure if that is intended to be some kind of

1310:

Some of the information on the page is out of date.

1014:- here's their advert in 1981, 2nd ad in the clip. 379:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 206:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4106:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3996:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3856:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1944:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 1382:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 2621:link 7 (Retailers slammed over factory conditions) 1935:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 1477:Does the factory "only" make clothing for Primark? 1373:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 413:This article has not yet received a rating on the 2930:Plus, you can count how many times you have used 1474:My questions that may help figure this out are: 297:, a project which is currently considered to be 2594:link 4 (What can you buy for 5p in Bangladesh?) 2305:Primark in storm over conditions at UK supplier 1506:has added the same info to all those articles). 814:I think this paragraph is slightly confusing: 4092:This message was posted before February 2018. 3982:This message was posted before February 2018. 3842:This message was posted before February 2018. 2160:be blocked from editing without further notice 1813:will not be tolerated and I won't hesitate to 2630:link 8 (Disgusting... but Primark's so cheap) 8: 3726:That's actually very true, Anyway reverted.. 1999:You can see more reference information here 1512:Well - take a look at the wikipedia article 3585:External Links - Most relevant/alphabetical 1936: 1374: 1012:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELnuijThhpU 495:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes 482:Category:Company articles needing attention 4210:C-Class Ireland articles of Mid-importance 4062:I have just modified one external link on 3812:I have just modified one external link on 3661:I've looked through other store wikis (IE 3080:to see how others responsed. For example, 2176:Knowledge:Please do not bite the newcomers 1987:Knowledge:Please do not bite the newcomers 1287:Seems odd that the stress would be on the 1015: 709:, which has consisted of little more than 444:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 422: 328: 257: 152: 47: 3922:I have just modified 4 external links on 3214:They are not notable. And please provide 3834:http://www.primarkresponse.com/panorama/ 2932:"someone trying to do" + your assumption 2256:Thanks everyone for your great support. 3250:Criticism_of_Apple_Inc.#Labor_practices 3089:Criticism_of_Apple_Inc.#Labor_practices 1770: 1720: 1064:Is there actually such a department??? 330: 259: 154: 49: 19: 1444:. It was the only part in the section 2977:3/ You used many bad adjectives here. 520:Help expand stub articles located at 7: 3078:the talk in the Pope Francis article 1456:who kept using a bunch of WP terms. 469:Category:Unassessed company articles 373:This article is within the scope of 293:This article is within the scope of 200:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 4235:Unknown-importance company articles 2835:worked in fashion, retail industry; 722:, Primark have never advertised on 38:It is of interest to the following 3459:On 27 April protesters surrounded 2855:I didn't know about Primark until 2756:violated for such a long long time 622:Primark is a very cheap shop :) 14: 4066:. Please take a moment to review 3926:. Please take a moment to review 3816:. Please take a moment to review 2127:Knowledge:Help_desk#Knowledge:NPA 2001:Knowledge:Help_desk#Knowledge:NPA 1781:Now I will do some Google search 3768:Conflicting info about Bonmarché 3027:the Ethical Trading Initiative. 3015:The current article only stated 2685:the Ethical Trading Initiative. 2670:The current article only stated 1924: 1362: 546:Tag company talk pages with the 435: 360: 350: 332: 286: 261: 187: 177: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 4225:Mid-importance fashion articles 4205:Mid-importance Ireland articles 2751:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 2680:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 2393:Please explain why you did so. 2300:Primark linked to UK sweatshops 393:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies 309:Knowledge:WikiProject Retailing 240:This article has been rated as 135:This article has been rated as 4240:WikiProject Companies articles 4186:22:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC) 3209: 2851:known a Bangladeshi in person. 1249:19:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 1190:20:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1122:01:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 535:Tag company articles with the 396:Template:WikiProject Companies 312:Template:WikiProject Retailing 1: 4215:All WikiProject Ireland pages 4050:12:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3756:19:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3722:19:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3699:18:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3654:18:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3638:14:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3454:Reliable source: The Guardian 2912:How many times have you used 2772:and potentially libelous. -- 2200:All information for my edits 1996:as a third opinion provider? 1334:23:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1030:19:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 996:13:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 885:04:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 758:19:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 673:16:05, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 656:16:05, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 608:19:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 598:17:20, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 387:and see a list of open tasks. 220:Knowledge:WikiProject Fashion 214:and see a list of open tasks. 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Ireland 109:and see a list of open tasks. 3579:14:57, 25 October 2013 (UTC) 2475:List of industrial disasters 1958:Could you please tell me if 1594:2013 Savar building collapse 1565:2013 Savar building collapse 1538:2013 Savar building collapse 1514:2013 Savar building collapse 1341:2013 Savar building collapse 1277:17:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 1234:14:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1214:09:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 1171:14:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1157:22:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 1137:14:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 956:15:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 933:registration of the name by 894:14:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 638:13:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 426:WikiProject Companies To-do: 223:Template:WikiProject Fashion 118:Template:WikiProject Ireland 4160:03:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC) 2934:for other editors. Is this 2369:Did you read before revert? 2005:Thank you very much. Best, 1964:User_talk:New_worl#May_2013 1948:, or consider visiting the 1632:here. How it may be named! 1386:, or consider visiting the 837:18:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 809:23:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 699:I have cut the paragraph - 4256: 4123:(last update: 5 June 2024) 4059:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 4013:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3919:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3873:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3809:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3352:Apple_Inc.#Labor_practices 3035:) 17:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2838:worked for advocacy group; 1771:'Sweatshops' & Primark 1301:23:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 976:15:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 942:16:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 904:10:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 828:12:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 415:project's importance scale 246:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 3799:19:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC) 2178:. Thank you again. Best, 1078:This comment was left by 1046:This comment was left by 923:17:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 914:08:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 865:07:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC) 744:13:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 690:08:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 421: 412: 345: 281: 239: 172: 134: 67: 46: 4230:C-Class company articles 4220:C-Class fashion articles 4200:C-Class Ireland articles 2542:Edit requests 6 May 2013 2026:User:Boing! said Zebedee 1088:17:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 1069:22:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 1054:15:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 794:21:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 773:00:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 4169:There is no mention of 4055:External links modified 3915:External links modified 3910:20:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 3805:External links modified 3542:11:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3527:10:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3499:17:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 3477:18:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 3434: 3427:12:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3413:11:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3393:11:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3364:12:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3328:12:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3314:11:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3299:11:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3281:11:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3266:10:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3244:17:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 3228:18:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 3216:Knowledge:Verifiability 3200:11:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3177:10:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3163:17:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 3147:18:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 3136:Knowledge:Verifiability 3116:10:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3064:17:34, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 3045:18:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2995:15:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2963:15:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2948:15:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2926:15:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2904:14:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2880:13:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2818:13:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 2800:10:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 2782:17:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2736:17:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2695:17:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2666:Knowledge:Verifiability 2626:Manchester Evening News 2561:17:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2537:15:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2516:15:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2494:16:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2465:16:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2428:16:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2403:08:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2364:16:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC) 2270:14:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 2252:19:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2218:16:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2188:16:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2109:15:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2083:13:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 2058:User:AutomaticStrikeout 2015:09:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 1910:19:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1896:19:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1877:18:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1849:18:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1831:18:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1706:17:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1676:17:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1662:17:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1642:14:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1622:14:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1577:17:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1550:12:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1532:12:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1498:11:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1466:14:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1409:11:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1355:11:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1306:Out of date information 3442: 3087:Second, can you go to 3076:First, please re-read 2848:gone to Bangladesh nor 2580:More reliable sources: 1433: 1204:. Which is right? -- 522:Category:Company stubs 28:This article is rated 3438: 3381:Guardian 2010 article 3287:Nike,_Inc.#Sweatshops 3254:Nike,_Inc.#Sweatshops 3210:Re. 'external people' 3093:Nike,_Inc.#Sweatshops 3021:No information at all 2857:the building collapse 2676:No information at all 2568:Link: The Independent 2469:Have you updated the 2234:This seems resolved; 2156:as you did at Primark 2087:From what I can see, 1762:Retrieved 1 May 2013. 1417: 559:requests for comments 550:WikiProject Companies 376:WikiProject Companies 295:WikiProject Retailing 4104:regular verification 3994:regular verification 3854:regular verification 2608:The Herald (Glasgow) 2317:protest hits Primark 2164:Knowledge:Harassment 1971:Knowledge:Harassment 1939:ask another question 1735:. London. 2013-04-25 1377:ask another question 1291:Can anyone confirm? 589:BHS Ireland purchase 4094:After February 2018 3984:After February 2018 3844:After February 2018 3446:watch your language 2599:The Daily Telegraph 2450:was done gracefully 1758:The Huffington Post 1419:On 25 April, 2013, 203:WikiProject Fashion 98:WikiProject Ireland 4171:Rita Ora X Primark 4165:Rita Ora X Primark 4148:InternetArchiveBot 4099:InternetArchiveBot 4038:InternetArchiveBot 3989:InternetArchiveBot 3898:InternetArchiveBot 3849:InternetArchiveBot 3450:talk about editors 3186:and probably fail 2574:Link: The Observer 2452:by 180.234.93.156. 2336:War on Want report 2172:Knowledge:Civility 2148:defamatory content 2046:User:Fluffernutter 1981:Knowledge:Civility 1966:are violations of 1076:]. I will remove. 315:Retailing articles 34:content assessment 4124: 4014: 3874: 3667:C. & J. Clark 3569:comment added by 3401:Original Research 3218:if you disagree. 2770:original research 2612:link 6 (Revealed) 2146:that "if you add 2089:User:Technical 13 2069:kind of guy from 2067:Fruit of the Loom 1956: 1955: 1941:on your talk page 1882:allowed as it is 1804: 1797: 1628:The Guardian has 1625: 1608:comment added by 1448:that was deleted 1421:a garment factory 1394: 1393: 1379:on your talk page 1337: 1320:comment added by 1267:comment added by 1196:Number of stores? 1124: 1108:comment added by 1086: 1032: 1020:comment added by 978: 966:comment added by 855:comment added by 842:Removed vandalism 784:comment added by 640: 628:comment added by 618:into this article 586: 585: 582: 581: 578: 577: 574: 573: 570: 569: 327: 326: 323: 322: 256: 255: 252: 251: 151: 150: 147: 146: 4247: 4177: 4158: 4149: 4122: 4121: 4100: 4048: 4039: 4012: 4011: 3990: 3908: 3899: 3872: 3871: 3850: 3753: 3744: 3737: 3696: 3687: 3680: 3635: 3626: 3619: 3595: 3581: 3100:Guardian article 2477:? Or what about 2473:article? Or the 2142:, he told me at 2106: 2101: 2096: 2054:User:Thumperward 2038:User:Nerdfighter 2034:User:Writ Keeper 1943: 1928: 1921: 1798: 1791: 1763: 1750: 1744: 1743: 1741: 1740: 1725: 1624: 1602: 1556:this BBC article 1381: 1366: 1359: 1336: 1314: 1279: 1147:I'm Removing It 1103: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1081:§©ʁİƃƀȴıŋ’ Ƨł₥ȫȠ 1052: 1050: 1049:§©ʁİƃƀȴıŋ’ Ƨł₥ȫȠ 961: 867: 796: 643:As suggested at 623: 553: 542: 508:Portal:Companies 450:Article requests 439: 432: 431: 423: 401: 400: 399:company articles 397: 394: 391: 370: 368:Companies portal 365: 364: 363: 354: 347: 346: 336: 329: 317: 316: 313: 310: 307: 290: 283: 282: 277: 265: 258: 228: 227: 226:fashion articles 224: 221: 218: 197: 192: 191: 190: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 123: 122: 121:Ireland articles 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 4255: 4254: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4190: 4189: 4175: 4167: 4152: 4147: 4115: 4108:have permission 4098: 4072:this simple FaQ 4057: 4042: 4037: 4005: 3998:have permission 3988: 3932:this simple FaQ 3917: 3902: 3897: 3865: 3858:have permission 3848: 3822:this simple FaQ 3807: 3770: 3747: 3738: 3731: 3690: 3681: 3674: 3629: 3620: 3613: 3589: 3587: 3564: 3437: 3377:rogue suppliers 3212: 3128: 3104:rogue suppliers 3017:many numbers of 3009: 2826: 2672:many numbers of 2635:The Independent 2582: 2549: 2544: 2524: 2522:Arbitrary break 2371: 2332: 2321:Another article 2313: 2296: 2286: 2206:Knowledge:Libel 2138:After my edits 2104: 2099: 2094: 2030:User:iridescent 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1751: 1747: 1738: 1736: 1727: 1726: 1722: 1603: 1423:in Rana Plaza, 1343: 1315: 1308: 1285: 1269:213.155.151.233 1262: 1221: 1198: 1178: 1144: 1099: 1097:Store Structure 1080: 1077: 1062: 1048: 1045: 1038: 873: 850: 844: 802: 779: 697: 663: 620: 591: 566: 563: 547: 536: 398: 395: 392: 389: 388: 366: 361: 359: 314: 311: 308: 305: 304: 271: 225: 222: 219: 216: 215: 193: 188: 186: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 4253: 4251: 4243: 4242: 4237: 4232: 4227: 4222: 4217: 4212: 4207: 4202: 4192: 4191: 4166: 4163: 4142: 4141: 4134: 4087: 4086: 4078:Added archive 4056: 4053: 4032: 4031: 4024: 3977: 3976: 3968:Added archive 3966: 3958:Added archive 3956: 3948:Added archive 3946: 3938:Added archive 3916: 3913: 3892: 3891: 3884: 3837: 3836: 3828:Added archive 3806: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3778:46.171.180.178 3769: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3727: 3670: 3659: 3610: 3608: 3606: 3597: 3586: 3583: 3560: 3558: 3557: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3515: 3512: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3483: 3436: 3435:Re. 'libelous' 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3211: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3132:since Jan 2009 3127: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3096: 3085: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3048: 3047: 3024: 3011:Yes. Because: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2975: 2972: 2928: 2914:bad adjectives 2907: 2906: 2869: 2867: 2853: 2852: 2849: 2846: 2839: 2836: 2825: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2806: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2682: 2668: 2656: 2654: 2653: 2632: 2623: 2614: 2605: 2596: 2581: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2570: 2548: 2545: 2543: 2540: 2523: 2520: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2482: 2471:Benneton Group 2453: 2442:nobody bothers 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2416: 2412: 2391: 2390: 2384: 2370: 2367: 2343: 2342: 2340:Another source 2331: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2302: 2295: 2292: 2285: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2112: 2111: 2085: 2042:User:Vacation9 1990: 1989: 1984: 1978: 1954: 1953: 1946:user talk page 1929: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1787: 1772: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1745: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1510: 1507: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1481: 1478: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1416: 1415: 1392: 1391: 1384:user talk page 1367: 1342: 1339: 1307: 1304: 1284: 1281: 1220: 1217: 1197: 1194: 1177: 1174: 1149:QuietusExtraho 1143: 1140: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1061: 1058: 1037: 1036:More Vandalism 1034: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 968:92.234.199.137 920:86.132.141.178 872: 869: 843: 840: 813: 801: 798: 786:86.179.140.173 770:Craighennessey 761: 760: 734: 733: 718:and George at 711:press releases 696: 693: 662: 659: 619: 612: 611: 610: 590: 587: 584: 583: 580: 579: 576: 575: 572: 571: 568: 567: 565: 564: 562: 561: 555: 554:project banner 544: 532: 524: 510: 497: 484: 471: 458: 443: 441: 440: 428: 427: 419: 418: 411: 405: 404: 402: 385:the discussion 372: 371: 355: 343: 342: 337: 325: 324: 321: 320: 318: 291: 279: 278: 266: 254: 253: 250: 249: 242:Mid-importance 238: 232: 231: 229: 212:the discussion 199: 198: 195:Fashion portal 182: 170: 169: 167:Mid‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Mid-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 90:Ireland portal 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4252: 4241: 4238: 4236: 4233: 4231: 4228: 4226: 4223: 4221: 4218: 4216: 4213: 4211: 4208: 4206: 4203: 4201: 4198: 4197: 4195: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4172: 4164: 4162: 4161: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4139: 4135: 4132: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4119: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4095: 4090: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4060: 4054: 4052: 4051: 4046: 4041: 4040: 4029: 4025: 4022: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4009: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3985: 3980: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3920: 3914: 3912: 3911: 3906: 3901: 3900: 3889: 3885: 3882: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3869: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3845: 3840: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3810: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3783: 3779: 3774: 3767: 3757: 3754: 3752: 3751: 3750:→Talk to me!→ 3745: 3743: 3742: 3736: 3735: 3728: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3697: 3695: 3694: 3693:→Talk to me!→ 3688: 3686: 3685: 3679: 3678: 3671: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3636: 3634: 3633: 3632:→Talk to me!→ 3627: 3625: 3624: 3618: 3617: 3604: 3600: 3593: 3584: 3582: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3561: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3513: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3441: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3285:Can you read 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3248:Please go to 3247: 3246: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3188:WP:NOTABILITY 3185: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3137: 3133: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3025: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3013: 3012: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2981: 2976: 2973: 2969: 2968: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2866: 2865: 2860: 2858: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2840: 2837: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2830: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2766: 2762: 2757: 2753: 2752: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2724: 2720: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2683: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2667: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2627: 2624: 2622: 2618: 2615: 2613: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2600: 2597: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2547:Two additions 2546: 2541: 2539: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2521: 2519: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2389: 2385: 2383: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2375: 2368: 2366: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2352: 2348: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2322: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2301: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2291: 2290: 2283: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2240:not a soapbox 2237: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2150:to Knowledge 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2110: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2090: 2086: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2003: 2002: 1997: 1995: 1988: 1985: 1982: 1979: 1976: 1972: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1965: 1961: 1951: 1947: 1942: 1940: 1934: 1930: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1802: 1801:edit conflict 1795: 1794:edit conflict 1790: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1779: 1776: 1775:Hi HighKing, 1761: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1746: 1734: 1730: 1724: 1721: 1717: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1520: 1515: 1511: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1475: 1473: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1432: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1397: 1389: 1385: 1380: 1378: 1372: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1340: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1311: 1305: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1283:pronunciation 1282: 1280: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1258: 1256: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1195: 1193: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1175: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1096: 1094: 1089: 1083: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1059: 1057: 1055: 1051: 1043: 1035: 1033: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1022:85.255.234.91 1019: 1013: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 993: 989: 983: 979: 977: 973: 969: 965: 958: 957: 953: 949: 948:130.88.85.111 944: 943: 940: 936: 930: 926: 924: 921: 916: 915: 912: 911:81.156.33.251 906: 905: 902: 896: 895: 892: 887: 886: 883: 879: 871:Pronunciation 870: 868: 866: 862: 858: 854: 847: 841: 839: 838: 835: 834:86.136.142.95 830: 829: 826: 825:217.68.21.230 822: 820: 815: 811: 810: 807: 799: 797: 795: 791: 787: 783: 775: 774: 771: 767: 766:Oxford Street 759: 756: 752: 751: 750: 746: 745: 742: 738: 732: 731: 729: 728:word of mouth 725: 721: 717: 712: 708: 702: 701: 700: 694: 692: 691: 688: 687:81.156.33.251 683: 679: 675: 674: 671: 666: 660: 658: 657: 654: 649: 646: 641: 639: 635: 631: 630:195.188.28.99 627: 617: 613: 609: 606: 602: 601: 600: 599: 596: 588: 560: 556: 551: 545: 540: 534: 533: 531: 529: 525: 523: 519: 517: 516: 511: 509: 506: 504: 503: 498: 496: 493: 491: 490: 485: 483: 480: 478: 477: 472: 470: 467: 465: 464: 459: 457: 454: 452: 451: 446: 445: 442: 438: 434: 433: 430: 429: 425: 424: 420: 416: 410: 407: 406: 403: 386: 382: 378: 377: 369: 358: 356: 353: 349: 348: 344: 341: 338: 335: 331: 319: 302: 301: 296: 292: 289: 285: 284: 280: 275: 270: 267: 264: 260: 247: 243: 237: 234: 233: 230: 213: 209: 205: 204: 196: 185: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 4168: 4146: 4143: 4118:source check 4097: 4091: 4088: 4061: 4058: 4036: 4033: 4008:source check 3987: 3981: 3978: 3921: 3918: 3896: 3893: 3868:source check 3847: 3841: 3838: 3811: 3808: 3775: 3771: 3749: 3748: 3740: 3739: 3733: 3732: 3692: 3691: 3683: 3682: 3676: 3675: 3631: 3630: 3622: 3621: 3615: 3614: 3602: 3588: 3571:2.96.166.188 3565:— Preceding 3562: 3559: 3552: 3449: 3445: 3444:You need to 3443: 3439: 3376: 3374: 3213: 3131: 3129: 3103: 3098:Third, this 3082:Andrewman327 3020: 3016: 3010: 2931: 2913: 2868: 2861: 2854: 2845:of companies 2827: 2788: 2755: 2749: 2703: 2675: 2671: 2660: 2655: 2586:The Guardian 2550: 2525: 2504: 2449: 2441: 2392: 2372: 2344: 2287: 2284:The timeline 2258:Technical 13 2236:Technical 13 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2144:my talk page 2075:Technical 13 2022:User:Yunshui 2004: 1998: 1991: 1960:Technical 13 1957: 1938: 1933:help request 1888:Technical 13 1864: 1860: 1837:Technical 13 1823:Technical 13 1786: 1782: 1780: 1777: 1774: 1756: 1748: 1737:. Retrieved 1733:The Guardian 1732: 1723: 1715: 1698:Technical 13 1693: 1627: 1604:— Preceding 1598:Pope Francis 1590:Technical 13 1587: 1542:Technical 13 1490:Technical 13 1449: 1445: 1442:Technical 13 1418: 1398: 1395: 1376: 1371:help request 1344: 1316:— Preceding 1312: 1309: 1288: 1286: 1263:— Preceding 1259: 1253:Indeed, see 1252: 1237: 1226:Darkieboy236 1222: 1219:Headquarters 1199: 1179: 1163:Smurfmeister 1160: 1145: 1129:Smurfmeister 1126: 1100: 1092: 1063: 1041: 1039: 1016:— Preceding 1009: 988:82.46.48.147 984: 980: 959: 945: 931: 927: 917: 907: 897: 888: 877: 874: 848: 845: 831: 821: 817: 816: 812: 803: 780:— Preceding 776: 762: 755:NotMuchToSay 747: 736: 735: 704: 703: 698: 684: 680: 676: 667: 664: 661:How it works 650: 642: 621: 595:83.70.59.159 592: 541:|Companies}} 527: 526: 513: 512: 500: 499: 487: 486: 474: 473: 461: 460: 448: 447: 374: 298: 241: 201: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 3599:WP:ELLAYOUT 3465:War on Want 3350:Do you see 2841:worked for 2617:Retail Week 2324:Another one 2123:Floquenbeam 2050:User:Sladen 1869:Floquenbeam 1104:—Preceding 962:—Preceding 857:86.46.22.12 851:—Preceding 707:advertising 695:Advertising 624:—Preceding 4194:Categories 4155:Report bug 4045:Report bug 3905:Report bug 3563:] gefd d 3553:assd asd 2824:Disclaimer 2440:You said ' 2158:, you may 1973:including 1739:2013-04-25 1716:References 1429:Bangladesh 1060:"Fat Wear" 901:TammiMagee 882:Spiderdust 880:Scotland? 724:television 4138:this tool 4131:this tool 4028:this tool 4021:this tool 3888:this tool 3881:this tool 3663:Debenhams 3448:when you 2843:this sort 2754:has been 2716:together. 2479:Joe Fresh 2415:sequence. 2351:WP:POINTy 2119:Vacation9 1884:WP:POINTy 1815:report it 1811:vandalism 1446:Incidents 1322:Mattricus 1110:Gandygatt 390:Companies 381:companies 340:Companies 306:Retailing 269:Retailing 4144:Cheers.— 4034:Cheers.— 3894:Cheers.— 3729:Thaanks 3714:HighKing 3672:Thanks, 3646:HighKing 3611:Thanks - 3592:HighKing 3567:unsigned 3534:HighKing 3519:New worl 3491:HighKing 3487:WP:EVENT 3469:New worl 3419:New worl 3405:HighKing 3385:New worl 3356:New worl 3320:New worl 3306:HighKing 3291:New worl 3273:HighKing 3258:New worl 3236:HighKing 3220:New worl 3192:HighKing 3184:WP:UNDUE 3169:New worl 3155:HighKing 3139:New worl 3108:New worl 3056:HighKing 3037:New worl 3029:New worl 2987:New worl 2955:HighKing 2940:New worl 2918:New worl 2896:HighKing 2872:New worl 2829:New worl 2810:New worl 2792:HighKing 2774:HighKing 2728:HighKing 2704:WHY NOT: 2687:New worl 2553:New worl 2529:HighKing 2508:HighKing 2486:HighKing 2457:New worl 2446:the edit 2420:HighKing 2411:article? 2395:New worl 2374:HighKing 2356:HighKing 2262:New worl 2210:New worl 2180:New worl 2007:New worl 1950:Teahouse 1902:New worl 1861:HighKing 1841:New worl 1668:New worl 1654:HighKing 1634:New worl 1630:an image 1618:contribs 1610:New worl 1606:unsigned 1569:HighKing 1524:HighKing 1458:New worl 1454:HighKing 1401:New worl 1388:Teahouse 1347:HighKing 1330:contribs 1318:unsigned 1265:unsigned 1206:HighKing 1176:New Logo 1118:contribs 1106:unsigned 1066:Artybrad 1040:Removed 1018:unsigned 986:Right?-- 964:unsigned 935:JC Penny 891:Davidb90 853:unsigned 806:Screen42 782:unsigned 737:I REALLY 626:unsigned 543:template 502:Maintain 476:Copyedit 300:inactive 274:inactive 4068:my edit 4064:Primark 3928:my edit 3924:Primark 3818:my edit 3814:Primark 3791:Keith D 3601:states 3461:Primark 2723:Notable 2168:neutral 2117:Thanks 1994:neutral 1975:threats 1819:blocked 1690:WP:NPOV 1588:Thanks 1142:Source? 800:Tidy up 716:Matalan 645:Penneys 616:Penneys 557:Answer 489:Infobox 244:on the 217:Fashion 208:Fashion 164:Fashion 139:on the 112:Ireland 103:Ireland 59:Ireland 30:C-class 4178:rose64 3734:→Davey 3677:→Davey 3616:→Davey 2936:WP:AGF 2891:WP:AGF 2887:WP:COI 2448:which 2063:Levi's 2056:, and 1807:threat 1182:Bevanl 849:Lol. 741:Mike33 614:Merge 539:portal 463:Assess 36:scale. 3741:2010→ 3705:Tesco 3684:2010→ 3623:2010→ 3190:. -- 2347:WP:OR 2152:again 1931:This 1652:. -- 1650:WP:OR 1450:twice 1440:Yes, 1425:Dhaka 1369:This 1293:kwami 1289:mark. 1224:name? 605:Kiand 528:Other 515:Stubs 4182:talk 4180:🌹 ( 4173:. -- 3795:talk 3782:talk 3718:talk 3709:Lidl 3650:talk 3575:talk 3538:talk 3523:talk 3495:talk 3473:talk 3423:talk 3409:talk 3389:talk 3360:talk 3324:talk 3310:talk 3295:talk 3277:talk 3262:talk 3256:. 3252:and 3240:talk 3224:talk 3196:talk 3173:talk 3159:talk 3143:talk 3112:talk 3091:and 3060:talk 3041:talk 3033:talk 2991:talk 2971:etc. 2959:talk 2944:talk 2922:talk 2900:talk 2876:talk 2864:here 2814:talk 2796:talk 2778:talk 2732:talk 2691:talk 2661:WHY: 2592:and 2557:talk 2533:talk 2512:talk 2490:talk 2461:talk 2424:talk 2399:talk 2388:link 2382:link 2360:talk 2330:2006 2311:2008 2294:2009 2289:Link 2266:talk 2248:talk 2244:Huon 2214:talk 2202:here 2184:talk 2140:here 2100:tion 2095:Vaca 2079:talk 2011:talk 1906:talk 1892:talk 1886:... 1873:talk 1845:talk 1827:talk 1702:talk 1672:talk 1658:talk 1638:talk 1614:talk 1573:talk 1560:this 1546:talk 1528:talk 1494:talk 1462:talk 1405:talk 1351:talk 1326:talk 1297:talk 1273:talk 1245:talk 1230:talk 1210:talk 1202:here 1186:talk 1167:talk 1153:talk 1133:talk 1114:talk 1026:talk 992:talk 972:talk 952:talk 861:talk 790:talk 720:ASDA 634:talk 4176:Red 4112:RfC 4082:to 4002:RfC 3972:to 3962:to 3952:to 3942:to 3862:RfC 3832:to 3707:or 2125:at 2071:USA 1983:and 1835:Hi 1452:by 1241:Rdd 939:Rdd 937:.-- 878:and 670:Rdd 653:Rdd 409:??? 236:Mid 131:Mid 4196:: 4184:) 4125:. 4120:}} 4116:{{ 4015:. 4010:}} 4006:{{ 3875:. 3870:}} 3866:{{ 3797:) 3784:) 3720:) 3712:-- 3665:, 3652:) 3577:) 3540:) 3525:) 3497:) 3475:) 3425:) 3411:) 3391:) 3383:) 3362:) 3354:? 3326:) 3312:) 3297:) 3289:? 3279:) 3264:) 3242:) 3234:-- 3226:) 3198:) 3175:) 3161:) 3145:) 3114:) 3106:' 3062:) 3043:) 2993:) 2961:) 2946:) 2938:? 2924:) 2902:) 2878:) 2859:. 2816:) 2798:) 2790:-- 2780:) 2734:) 2726:-- 2693:) 2649:, 2645:, 2641:, 2628:: 2619:: 2610:: 2601:: 2588:: 2559:) 2535:) 2518:. 2514:) 2492:) 2463:) 2426:) 2401:) 2362:) 2268:) 2250:) 2216:) 2208:. 2186:) 2174:, 2170:, 2166:, 2154:, 2081:) 2065:- 2052:, 2048:, 2044:, 2040:, 2036:, 2032:, 2028:, 2024:, 2013:) 1908:) 1894:) 1875:) 1865:to 1847:) 1829:) 1821:. 1755:. 1731:. 1704:) 1694:if 1674:) 1660:) 1640:) 1620:) 1616:• 1575:) 1548:) 1530:) 1496:) 1464:) 1427:, 1407:) 1353:) 1332:) 1328:• 1299:) 1275:) 1247:) 1232:) 1212:) 1192:. 1188:) 1169:) 1155:) 1135:) 1120:) 1116:• 1074:No 1028:) 994:) 974:) 954:) 863:) 792:) 668:-- 651:-- 636:) 552:}} 548:{{ 537:{{ 4157:) 4153:( 4140:. 4133:. 4047:) 4043:( 4030:. 4023:. 3907:) 3903:( 3890:. 3883:. 3793:( 3780:( 3716:( 3648:( 3605:, 3594:: 3590:@ 3573:( 3536:( 3521:( 3493:( 3471:( 3421:( 3407:( 3387:( 3379:( 3358:( 3322:( 3308:( 3293:( 3275:( 3260:( 3238:( 3222:( 3194:( 3171:( 3157:( 3141:( 3110:( 3058:( 3039:( 3031:( 2989:( 2957:( 2942:( 2920:( 2898:( 2874:( 2812:( 2794:( 2776:( 2730:( 2689:( 2637:: 2555:( 2531:( 2510:( 2488:( 2459:( 2422:( 2397:( 2358:( 2264:( 2246:( 2212:( 2182:( 2105:9 2077:( 2009:( 1952:. 1904:( 1890:( 1871:( 1843:( 1825:( 1803:) 1799:( 1796:) 1792:( 1760:. 1742:. 1700:( 1670:( 1656:( 1636:( 1612:( 1571:( 1544:( 1526:( 1492:( 1460:( 1403:( 1390:. 1349:( 1324:( 1295:( 1271:( 1243:( 1228:( 1208:( 1184:( 1165:( 1151:( 1131:( 1112:( 1024:( 990:( 970:( 950:( 859:( 788:( 730:. 632:( 530:: 518:: 505:: 492:: 479:: 466:: 453:: 417:. 303:. 276:) 272:( 248:. 143:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index