Knowledge

Talk:Prohibited degree of kinship

Source đź“ť

199: 178: 288: 267: 98: 77: 108: 298: 46: 21: 648: 740:
Used to be that deformities where still born, no matter if they where still born or not, the charge/costs onto society being fastly larger, and that, without social security and amassed conglomerate aid packages. Come to think of it, I suppose that it could very well be that that social security and
414:
1/7 of today's world population is in a consanguineous relationship. Clearly the taboo factor is a cultural one. The article is 4 years old so its likely way over 500M couples now. I'd wager, but can't be bothered to find out, that many cultures don't find it a taboo. Scientifically the risks of 1st
472:
This section is overly broad and collapses an incredible range and diversity of Asian peoples into one group. It is, I would argue, too imprecise to be useful. Content should be changed to refer to specific ethnic/national/religious groups, trying to be as specific as possible. Additionally, if
770:
Currently, the article refers to the Marriage Act (1949), and says that relationships between men and their close female relatives/women and their close male relatives are legally prohibited. As same-sex relationships have been legalised since 1949, and marriage is now possible between same-sex
732:
It is NOT a cultural universal, there used to be times in history where that happened, and quite frequently, there being a limited number of partners available. As time advances knowledge, that taboo became placed, but NOT for any other reason except the larger probability of obtaining double
692:
Moving unilaterally is generally allowed. I'm not aware of any rules about renaming during a deletion discussion. But since you apparently know of some, please do point them out. Anyway, the parentheses are somewhat immaterial to me. If they are that important to you, I won't object.
401:
Ahem. "Nearly." Surely, "some areas" can be found that are exceptions to almost any social generalization. The article neither supports nor condemns inbreeding, and does not say that it is taboo to everybody. If you want to place more variety in the article, edit the thing.
733:
recessives in offspring, which increments the chance of an infertil birth (death birth), natural abortion (if they´re lucky within the first weeks & month, if not, at a later stage of development with all that that implies), or post birth biological defects higher.
736:
That has nothing to do with culture, nor with morals, nor with ethics, solely medical biology & survivability in such a form and manner that the offspring remain at least modestly pertinent in their capacity to use two hands, two feets, and parts of their brain.
198: 177: 495:
I agree that this is mostly too broad to be useful, and also, as far as I know, the last comment about Korean law is actually incorrect, because those proscriptions remain in force. The one useful part, the first one on Korea, I've added to
382:
The conclusion is that there are large parts of the world where it is desirable or required to marry within the family. In some areas, the cultural and support advantages of close intermarrying outweigh the genetic problems.
565:
I'm removing material on this page and merging it into more specific sections. For the record, here is where each removed section went. Some this might have been paraphrased to make it "mesh" with the other pages.
473:
Asian groups are to be noted specifically, why are other groups (eg. African, European, Latin American, etc.) not clarified as well. I would argue that this section needs to be removed or clarified extensively.
249: 31: 771:
partners, I suspect (but do not know for sure) that this legislation has been amended to become gender-neutral. If so, this should appear in the article; if not, that should
455:
If third cousins means those who have a common great-great-grandparent, then under current (1983) canon law they are related in the eighth degree of the collateral line.
818: 239: 580:
The Eastern Church - First sentence thrown out. No sources, and does it mean in the civil-law degree counting method or canon-law? Last sentence moved to
828: 813: 354: 344: 458:
Were degrees of kinship calculated differently before 1917, or 1983? If so, a comment is needed on the quoted text; if not, a correction is needed.
823: 215: 538:
already. However, some of the material relating to uncle-niece marriages and affinal prohibitions can't go there, so I suggest it be moved to
431: 803: 751: 320: 160: 150: 480: 713:
This article seems to be only about Western societies and not any other ones. I'm not an expert but the focus here is far too narrow.
206: 183: 808: 798: 667:
to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the
311: 272: 546:
section. (By the way, some of this stuff, like the unnecessarily long quotations of Canon Law, should just be deleted, IMO.) -
625: 527:
Given the overlap with these two other pages, and also the title's lack of concision and being uneasy to find (see Knowledge
451:
he Roman Catholic Church's ban on marriage within the fourth degree of relationship (third cousins) lasted from 1550 to 1917
664: 660: 652: 57: 780: 427: 121: 82: 27: 379:
has a series of articles and maps which refute the statement that "inbreeding is taboo in nearly all cultures".
755: 45: 484: 125:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 423: 403: 776: 741:
amassed conglomerate aid packages reduced those stillbirth´s where otherwise they would be stillbirths.
63: 718: 747: 613: 592: 581: 574: 476: 419: 528: 20: 656: 319:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
214:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
698: 679: 621: 551: 505: 651:
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against
287: 266: 714: 784: 759: 722: 702: 686: 629: 606: 599: 570: 555: 535: 521: 509: 497: 488: 462: 435: 406: 396: 393: 303: 792: 694: 672: 663:. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some 617: 547: 501: 744:
Sure you can handle the ethics of/within morality without going somewhat neurotic?
211: 97: 76: 412: 107: 459: 297: 293: 113: 103: 316: 605:
Asian Cultures - much of this was overgeneralized or wrong. Other stuff to
647: 588: 543: 539: 517: 415:
cousin marriage appear to be raised, though quite low (see link).
531:), there doesn't seem to be a reason why this page should exist. 534:
I've gone ahead and placed all material relating to cousins in
126: 39: 15: 389:
I am not adequately expert to provide a solid alternative.
386:
This page should be rewritten for a more nuanced outlook.
376: 315:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 210:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 587:Cypriot Orthodox Church - First sentence moved to 569:Catholicism - Sections on cousin marriage went to 668: 8: 598:Church of England - summarized and moved to 43: 261: 172: 71: 263: 174: 73: 7: 819:Low-importance Anthropology articles 309:This article is within the scope of 204:This article is within the scope of 119:This article is within the scope of 411:Assuming this article is accurate: 129:and the subjects encompassed by it. 62:It is of interest to the following 224:Knowledge:WikiProject Anthropology 30:on 13 January 2010. The result of 14: 829:Low-importance sociology articles 814:Start-Class Anthropology articles 443:Calculation of degrees of kinship 227:Template:WikiProject Anthropology 646: 642:Copied from Khin2718's talk page 296: 286: 265: 197: 176: 106: 96: 75: 44: 19: 573:. Sections on affinity went to 561:Destination of removed sections 349:This article has been rated as 329:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology 244:This article has been rated as 155:This article has been rated as 26:This article was nominated for 824:Start-Class sociology articles 332:Template:WikiProject Sociology 1: 785:15:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC) 489:15:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 407:08:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 397:18:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC) 323:and see a list of open tasks. 218:and see a list of open tasks. 760:22:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 703:07:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 687:04:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 661:Prohibited degree of kinship 630:02:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 556:06:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 510:06:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 463:14:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 804:Low-importance law articles 436:09:39, 25 August 2012 (UTC) 845: 355:project's importance scale 161:project's importance scale 348: 281: 243: 192: 154: 135:Knowledge:WikiProject Law 91: 70: 34:was nomination withdrawn. 809:WikiProject Law articles 799:Start-Class law articles 723:04:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 207:WikiProject Anthropology 138:Template:WikiProject Law 775:appear in the article. 671:Knowledge. Thank you. 453: 52:This article is rated 449: 312:WikiProject Sociology 230:Anthropology articles 593:Affinity (canon law) 582:Affinity (canon law) 575:Affinity (canon law) 542:, specifically the 709:Worldwide coverage 653:naming conventions 529:naming conventions 447:The article says, 335:sociology articles 58:content assessment 766:England and Wales 750:comment added by 683: 633: 616:comment added by 479:comment added by 439: 422:comment added by 372:Inbreeding taboo? 369: 368: 365: 364: 361: 360: 260: 259: 256: 255: 171: 170: 167: 166: 38: 37: 836: 777:Caeciliusinhorto 762: 728:Severe mistakes: 684: 681: 677: 659:, as you did to 650: 632: 610: 491: 438: 416: 337: 336: 333: 330: 327: 306: 301: 300: 290: 283: 282: 277: 269: 262: 250:importance scale 232: 231: 228: 225: 222: 201: 194: 193: 188: 180: 173: 143: 142: 139: 136: 133: 116: 111: 110: 100: 93: 92: 87: 79: 72: 55: 49: 48: 40: 23: 16: 844: 843: 839: 838: 837: 835: 834: 833: 789: 788: 768: 745: 730: 711: 680: 673: 639: 611: 607:cousin marriage 600:cousin marriage 571:cousin marriage 563: 544:religious views 536:cousin marriage 525: 522:Cousin marriage 498:cousin marriage 474: 470: 468:Asian Relations 445: 424:Canhazanonymous 417: 374: 334: 331: 328: 325: 324: 302: 295: 275: 229: 226: 223: 220: 219: 186: 140: 137: 134: 131: 130: 122:WikiProject Law 112: 105: 85: 56:on Knowledge's 53: 12: 11: 5: 842: 840: 832: 831: 826: 821: 816: 811: 806: 801: 791: 790: 767: 764: 752:190.204.18.169 729: 726: 710: 707: 706: 705: 638: 635: 562: 559: 524: 514: 513: 512: 469: 466: 444: 441: 404:68.103.194.207 373: 370: 367: 366: 363: 362: 359: 358: 351:Low-importance 347: 341: 340: 338: 321:the discussion 308: 307: 304:Society portal 291: 279: 278: 276:Low‑importance 270: 258: 257: 254: 253: 246:Low-importance 242: 236: 235: 233: 216:the discussion 202: 190: 189: 187:Low‑importance 181: 169: 168: 165: 164: 157:Low-importance 153: 147: 146: 144: 118: 117: 101: 89: 88: 86:Low‑importance 80: 68: 67: 61: 50: 36: 35: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 841: 830: 827: 825: 822: 820: 817: 815: 812: 810: 807: 805: 802: 800: 797: 796: 794: 787: 786: 782: 778: 774: 765: 763: 761: 757: 753: 749: 742: 738: 734: 727: 725: 724: 720: 716: 708: 704: 700: 696: 691: 690: 689: 688: 685: 678: 676: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 649: 644: 643: 636: 634: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 608: 603: 601: 596: 594: 590: 585: 583: 578: 576: 572: 567: 560: 558: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 532: 530: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 494: 493: 492: 490: 486: 482: 481:211.16.117.82 478: 467: 465: 464: 461: 456: 452: 448: 442: 440: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 413: 409: 408: 405: 399: 398: 395: 390: 387: 384: 380: 378: 371: 356: 352: 346: 343: 342: 339: 322: 318: 314: 313: 305: 299: 294: 292: 289: 285: 284: 280: 274: 271: 268: 264: 251: 247: 241: 238: 237: 234: 217: 213: 209: 208: 203: 200: 196: 195: 191: 185: 182: 179: 175: 162: 158: 152: 149: 148: 145: 128: 124: 123: 115: 109: 104: 102: 99: 95: 94: 90: 84: 81: 78: 74: 69: 65: 59: 51: 47: 42: 41: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 772: 769: 746:— Preceding 743: 739: 735: 731: 712: 674: 645: 641: 640: 637:January 2010 604: 597: 586: 579: 568: 564: 533: 526: 471: 457: 454: 450: 446: 418:— Preceding 410: 400: 391: 388: 385: 381: 375: 350: 310: 245: 221:Anthropology 212:Anthropology 205: 184:Anthropology 156: 141:law articles 120: 64:WikiProjects 612:—Preceding 516:Merge with 475:—Preceding 377:consang.net 127:legal field 54:Start-class 793:Categories 773:definitely 665:guidelines 591:, rest to 114:Law portal 657:consensus 326:Sociology 317:sociology 273:Sociology 748:unsigned 715:Alázhlis 695:Khin2718 675:Wine Guy 626:contribs 618:Khin2718 614:unsigned 548:Khin2718 502:Khin2718 477:unsigned 432:contribs 420:unsigned 28:deletion 353:on the 248:on the 159:on the 589:incest 540:incest 518:Incest 60:scale. 460:Jm546 781:talk 756:talk 719:talk 699:talk 682:Talk 669:test 622:talk 552:talk 506:talk 485:talk 428:talk 655:or 609:. 577:. 500:. - 394:Ted 345:Low 240:Low 151:Low 132:Law 83:Law 795:: 783:) 758:) 721:) 701:) 628:) 624:• 602:. 595:. 584:. 554:) 520:, 508:) 487:) 434:) 430:• 392:-- 779:( 754:( 717:( 697:( 620:( 550:( 504:( 483:( 426:( 357:. 252:. 163:. 66::

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Law
WikiProject icon
icon
Law portal
WikiProject Law
legal field
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Anthropology
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Anthropology
Anthropology
the discussion
Low
importance scale
WikiProject icon
Sociology
WikiProject icon
icon
Society portal
WikiProject Sociology
sociology

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑