174:
80:
53:
90:
22:
162:
297:
I don't think
Roseland should be merged into Santa Rosa. Santa Rosa is incorporated, and last I checked, Roseland was outside the city limits. The U.S. Census Bureau treats Roseland as a separate place, so I think Knowledge should also. -
187:
63:
363:
There are no city limits for
Roseland because Roseland is not a city! It is a CDP. However, that does not make it part of the city of Santa Rosa. I think you've made a mistake. Please reconsider. Best,
326:
What's your source? I'm looking at a AAA street map updated in 2007 that clearly shows
Roseland as an unincorporated area even though it's surrounded by incorporated areas of Santa Rosa. --
449:
192:
408:
444:
226:
454:
247:
tag to the article (which doesn't require an AFD), I've removed the notice. I don't have a strong opinion as to whether or not it should be merged—anyone else?
439:
152:
142:
459:
434:
118:
327:
273:
explaining why I re-reverted it, why the AFD wasn't actually ever filed, and requesting that he please continue the discussion over here.
312:
I've checked- It's in the city limits of Santa Rosa. It is a specific neighborhood of Santa Rosa, just like
Downtown or Bennett Valley.
403:
103:
58:
282:
256:
399:
179:
33:
395:
331:
21:
380:
349:
I have checked myself. Nowhere does it show City Limits for
Roseland. IT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD OF SANTA ROSA.
211:
39:
391:
387:
369:
339:
303:
278:
252:
117:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
416:
95:
354:
317:
270:
379:
I would prefer to keep this a separate article and not do a merge. This area is or was a
365:
335:
299:
274:
248:
241:
428:
230:
413:
79:
52:
233:
was malformed, and that no reason was given for it, and that directly after that
210:
African
American and Asian American statistics are messed up. someone fix them?
419:
373:
358:
343:
321:
307:
286:
260:
350:
313:
266:
234:
222:
169:
113:
108:
85:
383:, and so there are census stats in the page history that should be preserved.
334:) 21:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC) I got logged out. Sorry, that was me, --
161:
386:
If it has been annexed by Santa Rosa, we should do the same thing when
269:
undid my revision, but the AFD is still malformed. I added a note on
390:
was incorporated a few months ago: The city annexed the CDP's of
15:
160:
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
384:
229:(or possibly two) on this article. Given that the
450:Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
409:former census-designated places in California
8:
445:Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
19:
455:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
47:
49:
7:
398:, and so we moved those articles to
101:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
440:Low-importance California articles
14:
404:Quail Valley, Menifee, California
188:San Francisco Bay Area task force
172:
127:Knowledge:WikiProject California
88:
78:
51:
20:
460:WikiProject California articles
435:Start-Class California articles
406:. I can find other examples of
147:This article has been rated as
130:Template:WikiProject California
1:
420:03:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
412:that were done the same way.
400:Sun City, Menifee, California
374:02:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
359:01:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
344:21:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
322:20:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
185:This article is supported by
180:San Francisco Bay Area portal
121:and see a list of open tasks.
308:06:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
287:00:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
261:05:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
476:
153:project's importance scale
168:
146:
73:
46:
396:Quail Valley, California
381:census-designated place
217:Deletion, merger, or ?
165:
104:WikiProject California
64:San Francisco Bay Area
28:This article is rated
164:
392:Sun City, California
388:Menifee, California
133:California articles
166:
34:content assessment
207:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
96:California portal
467:
246:
240:
182:
177:
176:
175:
135:
134:
131:
128:
125:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
465:
464:
425:
424:
295:
244:
238:
219:
178:
173:
171:
132:
129:
126:
123:
122:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
473:
471:
463:
462:
457:
452:
447:
442:
437:
427:
426:
423:
422:
348:
328:76.191.213.161
294:
293:merge proposal
291:
290:
289:
218:
215:
212:71.132.149.123
208:
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
193:Low-importance
184:
183:
167:
157:
156:
149:Low-importance
145:
139:
138:
136:
119:the discussion
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
472:
461:
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
432:
430:
421:
418:
415:
411:
410:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
361:
360:
356:
352:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
323:
319:
315:
310:
309:
305:
301:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:his talk page
268:
265:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
243:
236:
232:
228:
225:attempted to
224:
216:
214:
213:
194:
191:(assessed as
190:
189:
181:
170:
163:
159:
158:
154:
150:
144:
141:
140:
137:
120:
116:
115:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
407:
362:
347:
325:
311:
296:
220:
209:
186:
148:
112:
102:
40:WikiProjects
227:file an AFD
30:Start-class
429:Categories
267:User:Clab6
237:added the
235:User:Clab6
223:User:Clab6
124:California
114:California
109:U.S. state
59:California
366:Stepheng3
336:Stepheng3
300:Stepheng3
283:Contribs
257:Contribs
414:Zzyzx11
221:Today,
151:on the
417:(Talk)
36:scale.
351:Clab6
314:Clab6
242:merge
402:and
394:and
370:talk
355:talk
340:talk
332:talk
318:talk
304:talk
279:Talk
275:Dori
253:Talk
249:Dori
231:AFD
143:Low
111:of
431::
372:)
364:--
357:)
342:)
320:)
306:)
285:)
281:•
259:)
255:•
245:}}
239:{{
195:).
62::
368:(
353:(
338:(
330:(
316:(
302:(
277:(
251:(
155:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
