Talk:Rajat Gupta - Knowledge

1361:. Just look at her entry and you will see how far out of the Wiki Guidelines this has gone. This is not a resume or a paper for Law School, this is Knowledge and the rules are clearly defined. So even with the upcoming trial this again is not a "news" site that should be updated with the daily headlines, that clearly warrants another entry. For this entry it will be post-scripted on the verdict. You guys put quality work into this and I don't want to take away from Gupta's career accomplishments, goodwill or the impending charges but Wiki is a summary, not a redundancy or bibliography of litigious charges without conviction. The US vs Rajaratnam section is way too much for this entry. I will insist and enlist more editors to trim this down. Again, this is a not a place to make a case for an upcoming trial, nor is it a Law School paper. Let's get started. You can also always reach out to me on My talk board too. It's great to meet you both and look forward to working with you on this. 1401:. The "Law School paper" ref's I can't comment on directly -- no direct "Law" in me or my work -- but I stick by hoping that the content is not lost. I'm not "mak a case"; I'm tracking what seem to be the significant elements in a case which has been in preparation and will continue to unfold with RGupta as the central figure; he's the one on trial here. Finally, you cite one negative Wiki policy ("what it's not") and BLP; that's not much for policy backing; yes there are norms; I'm not revoking what I've conceded above here today but your air of authority on Wiki policy seems a bit high-handed, overall, I have to say. We shall see. 3269:) who is a current senior partner at McKinsey, and given his professional maturity and focus it seems quite likely that it is this other Rajat Gupta who had this MGI role. Absent clearer, preferably secondary, sourcing that it would indeed be the subject of this article in this role, and not the other guy, the claim that this indicates McKinsey has renewed its relationship with the subject of this artlce seems like suspect WP:OR. No objections to having my removal reverted if whoever does so can find clear sourcing that does not rely on name alone. 234: 213: 339: 318: 349: 745: 1290:

judge; who's just as or more liable to challenge the prosecution as the defense. In other words, all the players are pretty central, capable, prepared. I think it has the potential to be the first real public airing of part of the mess in the world financial system since 2008. It could fizzle but that too would be a big story. It's no problem, to me, that it's taken several years already to get to such a case. It took time in the

181: 2033:

not, I'd still warn against that feeling. The tapes exist. They will not be "disproven". They and the rest may not be deemed "proof of a crime" but they are and will be part of history and this individual's part in history. The "not guilty" verdict, should it come, of course becomes then the court's conclusion to that segment of the individual's life, and part of history. But wipe the events out of his/r biography? Not in

3263:) a section of the article starting "Despite McKinsey's assertions of severing ties with Gupta, Gupta was listed as a member of the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) Council...". This section seems to rely on primary research that "Rajat Gupta" was for some time listed, following the subject of this articles' release from prison, on the MGI website and publications. However, there is a different Rajat Gupta ( 708: 119: 95: 64: 531: 510: 630: 603: 244: 640: 1235:

agreement I will set the 4 section headers and we can move around existing content and then work on triming them, not because they are poorly sourced, but because Knowledge is for the casual reader, too much intricacies of any subject loses the reader. We need to make this so the everyday person walks away saying now they understand the subject we are writing on.

1197:, glad to be working with you both. An impending trial is a great time to clean this up before hand. Though the BLP Guidelines are mainly in place to prevent slander and false claims it does not protect filling a Wiki Entry with every source out there (hence the removal of the mentor example, just because it's quoted somewhere does not make it Wiki worthy). 446: 425: 2290:, you put a lot of good work into the list, we should put in prose as I always suggested and attempted before you changed it again. If we take it out before the trial the entry looses neutrality with this subjects Insider Trading section being documented a current event with the information changing rapidly as the event progresses. I will reinstate. -- 793: 3074: 1271:

challenge you because I knew how vulnerable the article was to "attack/Wikification/whatever". My likes the lists while I and maybe you, Monster, incline against them. On trial detail, maybe My is with me; or I'm alone on that one. It's tangled, for sure. Getting away from guidelines? Prob. so to some degree, but hard to solve.

129: 2098:

had charges in his info box it would be a mile long, so why not just wait for the verdict. I stand by that Wiki is not a news source. I've seen articles about the upcoming trial so is the intent to update every day of court? It's not what Wiki is for. Also the Affiliation list reads like a resume

1474:

simply be converted to a few paragraphs of mostly names; with the formers all grouped for example. Would condense a little but would look almost as weird. Again, maybe leave it until someone's willing to do the real "writing" job. Is there a template to put on the section to encourage that/discourage

1274:

My's comment above to the effect "Maybe we don't have to/want to address now" ("let the dust settle") has come back to me a couple of times as I've wrestled this around and around today here. In other words, history will sift this out; meanwhile, we have to build the basics of the historical record.

1011:

I hadn't tried to anticipate your preference -- list v. text -- but had tried to lean the above toward mine, which is text rather than list. Given your preference I can't see an easy solution and am willing to back down (again; for another stretch of time; let's say); leave it as is for now. If you'd

2775:

Not sure but don't you think your new lead is redundant since there are 3 sentences that address that in the next paragraph. I mean we get it, you hate the guy, but I don't think there is a person familiar with this subject that doesn't know that happened and needs that extra lead in to finally make

1406:

To My: I thought about the sandbox idea but am not sure I'll be participating. If you do it, maybe put a link to it here at least: I and others could "find you" if we want to join up. Awesome? We'll see. I'm expecting (without expectations, if that makes sense) you to have more appetite for the work

1048:

Back to do some updates, I was now particularly struck by the excessive three-paragraph introduction to the article. The first paragraph is fully adequate to introduce the article. I would have moved the two other paragraphs to the Summary sub-section which introduces the Career section except there

3272:

Partial disclaimer: About 5 years ago, I met this other Rajat Gupta, and heard from him how there are challenges in having the same last name as the infamous one, and be a current senior partner at McKinsey after the other one's history. This has attuned me to the possibility of confusion, which is

2460:

OK, I appreciate that, I will work with you. I ask the same of you, please discuss before re-inserting what we already discussed was going to be in the bigger story page. First I will ask, does it need it's own header or, as you pointed out, since it's a focal point of the Insider Trading section

2032:

I have sensed in some of Mike's comments (like the removal from the "info box" citing MMilken) the feeling that if there is a "not guilty" in the trial, all the charges and arrest and lead-up to the trial would become basically irrelevant to RGupta's story. Whether I'm right re: my sense of Mike or

1835:

OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS - Global Health Council; Board Member - Global Business Council (for Health); Board member - Emergency Management research Institute (EMRI); Founding Board Member - Health Management Research Institute (HMRI); Founding Board Member - Harvard School of Public Health;

1270:

to cut, trim and shape. And your timing and spirit seem good. But the divisions are deep and "baked in" and you risk cutting "muscle" along with duplication if you proceed as you did on your first round (as I think you've already conceded; but I have to make the point). Unlike My, I wasn't ready to

1136:

Hi Monstermike99! Welcome to the page -- glad to have you with us. I reverted your three edits because I disagreed with them: 1) the career table makes sense as a summary, 2) the "mentor" line is not subjective at all, and is described verbatim in the source, and 3) it's often hard to remove entire

1082:

Haven't had time to look at duplication at all -- so I leave it in your capable hands. Suggest we spin out the list of affiliations into a separate wikipedia article, but the idea of "List of Rajat Gupta's professional affiliations" sounds silly.... How else do we get an overview of what he's done?

913:

could go too, but I'd be happy to see just the List go for now. I put the "out of date" tag on the List long ago and I hate to think how poor it is now in terms of date-ness. Only caution: Make sure citations aren't orphaned in removal. I'd take the job on with a little support here, though I can't

2929:

Understood but in the event he does get it overturned that gets top billing because he will be a free man and in the US Justice system that conviction is null and void and just a glorious memory of his detractors. But I haven't even read about any updates on the appeal date, etc., so not an issue

2593:

The order was established so I am changing Philanthropy back to the spot after career. I am about to report this as war editing and put a lock to prevent these attacks because another anonymous editor made changes, which means this page is under attack from either a reputation.com-like outfit that

2266:

I've shifted from "asterisks" (dot points) to "colons" (indents) on a number of contributions in above sections. Dot points work well within a single contribution (or list :-)) but indents, I think per Wiki custom, work well to distinguish different contributors' or different times' contributions.

2072:

Swliv, I completely agree with you. I'm sitting out a lot of these changes because too much is happening too quickly, and I want to respect Mike's willingness to improve the article. But 1) the Insider Trading 2011 name should definitely be changed, 2) Too much about insider trading has been taken

1676:

needs some work in terms of prose and probably should be trimmed down as more recent news made some conrtibutions obsolete. In terms of the Gupta case we might want to hold off on more edits with the trial upcoming, as you pointed out, but also because Wiki, again is not a news source so possibly

2790:

No hatred. Just want balance. First line said nothing about most significant event of last five years of career. We don't not say what everyone knows because "everyone knows it". Now first line intros the second paragraph which in turn intros the article. Seems balanced to me. Appreciate your not

1234:

The way to trim this down is to use this format. His pending trial should not be a line by line update on every day in court, just as the court cases that pertain to him and those cases that he wasn't on trial, like US vs Rajaratnam, should be a one liner at most in this entry. If we are all in

936:

Hey man, I don't think the list should be removed, because its a great snapshot to see the range of things he's done. Where things are outdated I've put "former." In general things should be mentioned twice -- once in paragraph form and once in list form -- if we are in fact going to describe his

2908:

clear?; it's a quibble but not I don't think an irrelevancy). On the native-language name rendition, are you confused there too? Please look at the article if so, see the boxes at the head of the article and in the infobox and opine on whether you think they serve any purpose as is. I'm favoring

1310:

I think we're a big step beyond "news-y" in this article; at least in some substantial parts. Yes, there are news bits added one on the next, particularly re: the trial prep. But I think the bits are in context, integrated, at least (most of, I hope) the ones I've worked on; I feel so. I hope we

2141:

From another direction, your willingness to presume to say "what Wiki is for" continues to grate. This is an important case and the pre-trial negotiations tell much of how our legal system and society treat such behavior particularly given the centrality of the judge, Rakoff, to a wide range of

1289:

mind as the relevant precedent. Boesky's good to be reminded of, here, but does seem like ancient history now. Wow. But RGupta has so much that is central to our day (building on all the precedents): the financial markets; the global economy; Goldman; P&G, too! And a tough, proven, involved

1302:

in 1933, four years after the "crash". (Pecora was the "the fourth and final chief counsel for the investigation" I've just learned from Wiki; for me, here, that's just another signal how these things develop slowly, complicatedly, and unpredictably.) (And we are in an election season, now, of

2991:

The template {{External links}} was placed Oct. '12 in the section. I cleaned up section a bit just now. It seems to me a valid collection of material related to the article, some I contributed. Some could be integrated into article, maybe even removed. Meanwhile, I removed the open-ended

2556:

I've already worked a bit at rewriting what you had in prose for the "post-McKinsey" section of his career biography. If I did it right, there shouldn't be anything in the affiliation list that isn't already in that section. In that case the list may already be fairly glossary-ready. :)

2327:

has always hated that list -- he just said "I can't quite believe you're still sticking a (re-jiggered) list like that into the body of the article ... except that I know on that I've always fought a losing battle. So far." So I tried to put it somewhere else. Anyway, do whatever :)

2539:

I understand that and I for one was against it in the first place but didn't want us to seem like shills for the SEC in taking that down, let me take a stab at putting it in prose for the most notable and important ones and then we can have the "glossary" of sorts at the end.

1449:

I don't want to diminish his vast contributions but the affiliations list is excessive. Should we reduce it to just current because I see a lot of "former" in the list? It's a tough call because obviously the Gates Foundation is notable and probably should stay. Thoughts?

2093:

The reason I chose that header for the article was that aside from Rajaratnam's trial there was even more insider trading and convictions that really stemmed from Rajaratnam's case. Regarding charges versus convictions, I'm not presuming anything. I'm simply saying, if say

1303:

course. Sweeping it away ....) Well, to conclude these thoughts: If premature deletion/"forgetting" happens in a more or less central case like RGupta's, then we impede the slow, tough, incremental overall process of examination, learning and accountability and then we

1311:

won't get overly righteous on that front here, in a developing story. Like that Wiki template on "this person just died; events may change quickly": A trial is slower, but "developing" all the same, no? If we don't gather the pieces now, as we go, when will we?

3120:

The word philanthropist could be changed to criminal very easily - add some accuracy. I doubt that his one conviction is his only crime - how many stockholders do you have to cheat to make a million. Did Goldman Sachs press charges or did they shutup and duck.

1375:

Awesome job, guys. I propose this -- can we spin off a duplicate page on someone's wiki sandbox, and then all work on it there? This is like "Project RGupta 2.0." That way we can all make changes without worrying about the existing 1.x change stream by others.

959:". I haven't brought myself to reread the above section. I do think the article's much improved since the earlier days. But, since those days, I've also absorbed the general resistance in Knowledge for lists within articles. I can't find anything, for example, 1222:

Philanthrophy Section - a lot of what you have cited in Career fall into this category but needs to be better sourced as most are just referencing the Wiki entry of the group or organization Gupta belongs too. The List of professional affiliations is far too

2485:

he's accused of doing it with (the section in question). Sort of like the difference between data and metadata, facts and context. That's why I think a subheader is ok. We might want to add another subheader to the other half, like "charges and history" or

1325:

A separate trial article is OK if you really want it. But I think it fits fine here. RGupta had a big career; and he made allegedly a big mistake(s). With some trimming of duplication, I think there's room for the story of both in one article about him.

1207:. I do believe his accomplishments are noteworthy but we need to summarize. So we can do a rags to riches story but it should be where he started and where he ended up. Again, please look at the following entries that had similiar controversies like 1137:

sections without some justification. I think in this case, because it isn't defamatory material or something that violates BLP guidelines, the correct policy is to leave it up and hash it out here in the talk page. Please let me know if I'm wrong.

2903:

a clearance on appeal would not remove the record of the action and the conviction, just change the resolution; it'd be a major event, I'd agree, but whether it would lead to a major revamp of the article, I don't agree automatically in advance;

1635:

Welcome back, check out the new entry I made for the case, it needs work and trimming but goes more to what got away from the entry here in terms of summarization. And I linked Ron Daniel so I'm OK with my Mentors objection now. Thank you for

2130:; and they continue to contribute to our understanding of how celebrity culture works as well as to our artistic/cultural life; but that's rather a different realm than P&G and Goldman boardrooms, don't you think? Just showing my biases in 1426:

Some's clearly been done. More specifics below. I did a largely routine visit today, except for making the Controversy head more connected to the introduction and to the current event; will of course drop "prospective" when trial launches.

2026:

also makes me want to caution against too-heavy reliance on other Wiki articles as optimal expressions of either (a) Wiki policy or (b) what's best for RGupta, policy or anything else notwithstanding. An argument needs merits of its own,

2021:

to be emulated one way or another, though my mention left itself open to such an interpretation. I was referring, rather, to MStewart's insider trading case, as I recall it in history, as being a historical precedent to the RGupta case.

2614:

Just putting out for all editors, this section is in question and though I do agree the bullet format is not within Wiki guidelines, the accomplishments, career associations, etc., need to find a place in the entry itself. Help anyone?

2930:

for quite some time it seems. We are agreement on that. For the Native name I'm OK with deletion and in agreement with you also. 2 agreements in one day is more then we have had in 3 years so I say that is a good day my friend. --

2150:

trusted it was more than just imagining -- may end being the best encapsulation of the whole saga. Before the trial begins/began. Well, on we plunge, eh? For the record, noone's cut out the "everybody" citation/bit yet. Thank you.

1056:

One rationale for having a concise introduction is so the Contents box appears at least partly in the "first view" of the page. Then a reader can begin right away to get a real sense of the ... (hey!) contents of the article.

2348:

Hate is a strong word, stronger I think than I have used or would use, but it's true that I don't like the list. I also, sorry, don't like it as a free-standing article, just as I don't like the free-standing (prospective)

882:

Raj Rajaratnam, and also didn't trust the numbers -- I've seen figures as high as 105 years thrown around (say, if all the charges ran consecutively). Of course this will all evolve once the trial begins. Hope all is well!

1109:). If the trial is of noteworthiness then we should build an entry for that, otherwise this entry should be trimmed down to Career, Philanthropy and Controversy. Some other notable figures with similar controversies are 1914:

as citation for nothing (too partisan). If their list illuminates a gap, though, I'd certainly find a good independent source, then add it in, with both cites if you'd like maybe. I'd also say if you could add something

2158:

for the new article? I don't think any other profile cases appear there. Name-changing is called "moving" an article, in Wiki, for ref. Should be pretty easy. But let's get consensus on a change before a change, eh?

1469:

them all. The "former"s are often "since the controversy". The "out of date" is also a necessary but unfortunate part of the section. I came to be comfortable with the section as is as I went back in today. The list

3311: 195: 1989:

section (above, per link) and I think in line with my more recent comments on this page, I have to say we now have duplication-removal and other major shifts in the article, all fast and relatively undiscussed,

1144:

here, since he's also interested in this page (as you can see from the talk page history). We had both been watching this page over a while, and I think it's time to tackle this more fully. Areas to tackle are:

2644:

Also merged part of appendix list into paragraph form in Outside McKinsey and Philanthropy sections. Tried to update status of these positions as much as possible. Let me know if anything needs fixing! Thanks,

2434:

Shortened and made it completely Gupta-centric. I've read many articles this weekend about Gupta's relationships as the central focus of his trial, so it should be on his wiki page. The wider stuff can go into

2134:? Possibly. I was aware of no charges against CSheen but I can imagine there are some, even many. If someone chose to document them conscientiously I wouldn't presume to rule that "out of bounds". But Sheen 3306: 2860:

I'm talking about right now is the language boxes. I also responded to your "if he gets the conviction overturned" with a general caution about how big a revamp might be needed. Clear? Hope so. Cheers.

1895:

That reads like a resume, plus the site seems to be something the subject created for himself. Though I believe it is all true the source is the subject which makes it self-serving and questionable.--

992:

I think if you add more ==s the section title becomes bold. Hmm... so should I try eliminating some of the paragraphs and just keeping the list? I think the list is essential, since he's done so much.

1965:

I can't quite believe you're still sticking a (re-jiggered) list like that into the body of the article ... except that I know on that I've always fought a losing battle. So far. Sorry, hafta say it.

2720:

Yes, you had missed it on web page 6 of my source. In checking it I found my wording was a little strong for either source so I've changed the wording and restored my newer, stronger source. Cheers.

2659:

Merged in as much of the Educational affiliations as possible into the body of the article, and removed the rest of the appendix. This should now be more compliant with wikipedia styles I think.--

492: 3122: 3411: 2575:

Update: I just double checked and it looked ok? Nothing in one that wasn't in the other. So I'm going to move it near the end and retitle. Hope I'm not jumping the gun. Feel free to cmt here.

3366: 1731:

back to the bottom since it doesn't make sense to a reader who doesn't know the subject to have that as the intro, logically it would come after they read the controversy to get more info --

1226:

Controversy - This section would include a summary of these cases, minus the sub-headers and like I mentioned if these cases are noteworthy of a page I will help in building a seperate entry

1510:

For me it was a sign of another level of activity around the trial. I think you've already moved it to Controv. section. I can certainly live with that. I'd be less inclined to remove it.

457:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 3376: 585: 575: 458: 190: 105: 1591:

sorry guys, I've been away this week. Not sure which section you're talking about. I remember reading somewhere a reference to Ron Daniel as mentor. He has a wiki page, I think it's

1576:

I left it in for now but since neither figure is notable (no Wiki entry) I think they are irrelevant to the reader. Kind of like me pointing out my heroes as kid, nobody cares.

3396: 3381: 3371: 3331: 2843:

Let me know what specifically you are talking about. Obviously I'm going to object if all you want to keep is all the conviction on appeal talk and erase the rest of his life. --

290: 3316: 2099:

in it's bulleted format, I know it's important and notable but not in that metrical style. So I think we have a great opportunity to tell the story from start to finish in the

1923:

site (even including its, say, having a stellar biography), either from the site itself or particularly from third parties, that'd be good, done right. Mike is more skeptical

1140:

The second point is that this page needs a lot of work. It's very long and we should figure out what to do with some of the stuff like redundant lists (see above). Roping in

43: 1166:

The final point is that this subject is about to be in a criminal trial, and there will be a bunch of edits. Does it make sense for the dust to settle or hammer it out now?

3326: 551: 453: 430: 1617:

BTW, there's been a ton of work done on this page, I feel like I'm behind -- but great job! what should I be doing to catch up, or what sections should I be working on?

1526:+1 with Swliv. And wasn't there a movie reference too? Yes these sorts of things are self-serving -- we should be vigilant about cutting down anything that looks like 1337:

It's a bit scary because I knew nothing about any of it before now and still don't know much (yet). But it seems nonetheless to buttress my support of My on this one.

1393:

To Monster: OK on another entry for the trial; as at MStewart I guess; since you're insistent; if you're willing to do it; I think most of the Rajaratnam has a place

1704:

page, right? Would hate to be undoing someone else's hard work. So as Mike is taking huge chunks out, I think I'll sit out and save up energy for next week's trial.

1028:

Yep, I'll think about it. Maybe we should merge the list with the "post-McKinsey" section in career. Will try out a change if I have time and report back here. :)

3361: 3202: 3198: 3184: 482: 2053:

been overly trimmed/re-directed but I am concerned by the rapidity and some of the emphases of the changes. I trust the overall article and its now-accompanying

1495:

This seems very self serving and promotional. I suggest we either remove it or make it a line in the controversy section since it has to do with his trial(s).

2378: 2195: 538: 515: 1996:. And we have them at a time of presumably heightened attention to the page, with the trial. Having reviewed quickly the above series of recent comments, the 3406: 3296: 722: 48: 3356: 3170: 1723:

Just a reminder Wiki is not a newspaper, Wiki is not for daily updates on any trial, we can update after it's over. What we need help in is trimming down

31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1203:

Career Section - minus the Career summary which is redundant. I also object to a career progression chart because it violates what Wiki is Not Guidlines

3416: 3401: 300: 3346: 2350: 2305: 2155: 1554:

There certainly was a movie reference. Nothing automatically self-serving about a movie. It certainly ought still to be in the article, IMHO. Mike?

1329:

On a smaller scale: I agree with My's "mentor" inclusion quite strongly. My has worked hard to bolster and integrate McKinsey into this article and

960: 407: 397: 3030:

after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add

3321: 3301: 1008:

I've never known a section-headline to come out non-bold; going up to three "="s from two does make it bold but also smaller than the rest; weird.

951:

I disagree quite completely. And you may have noticed my "three times" above. I'd forgotten how much had already been said on this subject in the

147: 23: 3391: 3336: 698: 688: 3351: 3341: 2381:

or to the non-Kumar alternative (in red also for now, above), please go to that "Inspiration; title?" section linked to just above. Thanks.

2261:

link at left of article helpful on this sort of subject but don't see that it archives past links, alas, for purposes of the present issue.

151: 2879:

Not clear, no hope :) Please say exactly what you are talking (give an example) about because I'm not getting what you are alluding to? --

3421: 3386: 2776:

them aware. It's in the infobox, has a second Wiki about the trial, etc. Just search his name and everything is related to the trial. --

2684: 266: 3126: 155: 3180:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1357:

Great input. First step is I will implement the new section headers, without removing any content. You bring up a good example of

717: 613: 146:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 2687:

in that "actually", too?) I could scoff at three edits to do one, just before, but we all make mistakes. I do try to remember the

2143: 1279:

hand, your "get it ready for the trial", Monster, also rang attractively and strongly to me when I first read and considered it.

3273:

why I am making this edit. But I do not have any relationship with either one that could be considered a conflict of interest.

142: 100: 257: 218: 2977:

re: Aswini Kumar Gupta case in 1936; from External links. If related to article subject, restoration in context encouraged.

363: 323: 3245: 3171:

https://web.archive.org/web/20131103100230/http://www.financialexpress.com/news/isb-aiming-to-be-world-no.1-gupta/656936

2495:

the section about the wiretaps -- but this section was particularly important to include in a reduced and modified form.

75: 1660:), which pretty much talks about what we discussed. I based the size of the Controvesy, in terms of paragraphs off of 1945:

OK, agree that friends.com is out as a source. I'll go ahead and integrate these lists, with asterisks where need be.

663: 653: 608: 2893:

Hmm. You made a comment about a "major revamp ... if" and I responded at 16:28 with a general caution ("something"

2760:

Maybe a dumb question: Is there any use to the "রজত কুমার গুপ্ত" boxes in the lead and the infobox of the article?

761: 1397:, then. The term "encyclopedic" did come to mind to rebut your "summary". "Enlist more editors" makes me think of 1012:

like to take out third mentions it would be an improvement; I may too. Meanwhile, thanks for re-engaging. Cheers.

3174: 2630:

I took a section of the list and put it into paragraph form in the Philanthropy section. Makes more sense there.

2361: 2199: 2005: 1848:

US-INDIA BUSINESS COUNCIL - Board Member/ Executive Committee Member for approx. 10 years - Chairman for 3 years

373: 3201:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3160: 1340:

And, on a small scale, Monster, I did some indent editing on your entry above. For clarity, hopefully helpful.

1318:

central to the Gupta trial. And I don't think it's well covered in the Rajaratnam article. So it has to be here

773: 2594:

represents the SEC or maybe some disgruntled ex-McKinsey people. Either way neutrality must be maintained. --

2142:

financial-misdeed-accusation trials/settlements. That a blogger can even imagine that RGupta's defense may say

1592: 1854:

GATES FOUNDATION - Strategic Advisor for 10+ years - Chairman of Advisory Council on Global Development

1829:

GLOBAL FUND FOR AIDS, MALARIA, & TUBERCOLOSIS - Founding Board Member - Chairman of the Board for 3 years

63: 3236: 3152: 2935: 2884: 2848: 2812: 2807:

I understand your point. I guess if he gets the conviction overturned then this will need a major revamp. --

2781: 2743: 2710: 2620: 2599: 2545: 2466: 2313: 2295: 2248: 2185: 2108: 1900: 1746:

Changed it to "main" because that's what we mean. It should be at the top to emphasize "there's more here."

1736: 1686: 1641: 1581: 1500: 1455: 1366: 1240: 1126: 1060:

Did you, My2011, look at the Wiki policy I cited above on lists, by the way? Lists are clearly not favored.

32: 2705:

Nothing personal, wasn't an attack. If I mistankenly misread the original source, my apologies. Cheers. --

2522:

The affiliation list feels more like an appendix to me -- can I move it to the end of the article? Thanks,

1802:

PRATHAM (India) - Reading, Writing, & Math skills of 3-12 year olds - Board Member from inception

265:

articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3148: 2826:

the empty or illegibly cluttered boxes in the lead and the infobox unless there is objection/explanation.

832: 825: 818: 2364:. I guess, also, that my dislike of the two free-standing spin-offs comes for somewhat different reasons. 2073:

out and 3) We have to be careful to balance the positives and negatives, and be careful to undue weight.

3220:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3208: 3106: 3086:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2931: 2880: 2844: 2808: 2777: 2739: 2706: 2616: 2595: 2541: 2462: 2309: 2291: 2244: 2181: 2104: 1896: 1732: 1682: 1637: 1577: 1496: 1451: 1362: 1266:

But I haven't seen a way to reconcile the two camps. Monster, you're the first to come in with the true

1236: 1122: 81: 3151:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3038:

to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

1665: 861:

by the term lengths possible; ... but excluding them from the intro? Yo'r choice ... for now, I guess.

2308:, his affiliations are notable but not as a stand alone. That seems very pro-Gupta and not neutral -- 1845:

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM - Foundation Board Member for 10+ years - Member of WEF US Board since inception

3064: 2664: 2436: 2357: 2226:

A lot of related Knowledge articles used to link to this page. Please be careful with section moves!

2177: 2100: 2054: 2000:

and a few of the edits, I have a few concerns. I hope I haven't missed things in my relative haste.

1817:

TSINGHU UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL (Beijing, China) - Board Member for 5+ years; Zhu Rongji Chairman

1808:

HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL - Board of Dean’s Advisors for 10+ years - Chairman of the Board for 3 years

1728: 1724: 1701: 1673: 42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 2491:

I promise to be careful before readding -- and I don't think too much needs to be readded, frankly,

1866:

MILLENIUM PROMISE - Transform African villages to meet millennium development goals - Board Member

1820:

KELLOGG (NORTHWESTERN), LAUDER (WHARTON), AND SLOAN SCHOOL (MIT) - Board Member at all for 5+ years

2635: 1656:

Hey all, so I created an entry, actually found the idea for the Wiki Entry name from this articel (

1295: 840: 550:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

233: 212: 2121: 1531: 879: 779: 46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 3267: 3205:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1842:

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - Chairman; 2010/2011 - Vice Chairman; 2008, 2009, & 2010

1789:

McKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. - Member of the Firm 1973 to 2007 - Managing Director 1994 to 2003

1657: 1067:

those two extra intro paragraphs. How about that?) Seem to have regular bold back. That's nice.

3221: 3087: 3278: 3025: 1678: 1527: 839:

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |

3102: 2650: 2580: 2562: 2527: 2505: 2448: 2333: 2231: 2078: 2004:

I'm not sold on the name for the new, controversy-only article, and have started expressing

1950: 1884: 1814:

SKOLKOVO (Business School in Russia) - Board Member for 5+ years; Dmitri Medvedev, Chairman

1751: 1712: 1622: 1604: 1539: 1381: 1334: 1299: 1291: 1174: 1088: 1033: 997: 942: 888: 824:] The anchor (#Notable current and former employees) is no longer available because it was 805: 775: 744: 134: 3228: 3094: 2822:

Thanks. Certainly something would then be needed. On the original topic of this section, I

1262:

There's been a seesaw between testimonials and "the case" in the building of this article.

1105:

This entry is reading like a news report and a resume, which is what Knowledge is not (see:

972:

And any idea what's up with the section title? It has no bold, here. Well, cheers, onwego.

338: 317: 3033: 2997: 2982: 2957: 2918: 2866: 2831: 2796: 2765: 2725: 2696: 2660: 2415: 2386: 2272: 2258: 2207: 2164: 2062: 2042: 1970: 1932: 1811:

HARVARD UNIVERSITY - Member of Finance Task Force; set up by then President Larry Summers

1559: 1515: 1480: 1432: 1417: 1348: 1256: 1072: 1017: 977: 926: 866: 249: 39: 1876:- Goldman Sachs - American Airlines - Harman International - Genpact - Sberbank (Russia) 1805:

INDIAN INSTITUTES OF TECHNOLOGY (IIT) - Founding Chairman, Pan – IIT Alumni Association

3187:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2631: 1669: 1358: 1282: 1212: 1208: 1114: 1110: 1106: 831:] The anchor (#Galleon insider trading scandal) is no longer available because it was 354: 3227:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3093:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

180: 3290: 2237: 2095: 1661: 1204: 1740: 1718: 3274: 1992: 956: 645: 3264: 2944:

With no reference to this discussion but saying they weren't supported by source,

909:. "Tuberculosis" is for instance listed three times in article I see. I'd say the 2304:

I just noticed you created a page, but unlike the very notable and press covered

3194: 3144: 3015: 2688: 2646: 1216: 1118: 1029: 993: 938: 910: 906: 884: 118: 94: 3193:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3175:

http://www.financialexpress.com/news/isb-aiming-to-be-world-no.1-gupta/656936/

2993: 2978: 2953: 2914: 2862: 2827: 2792: 2761: 2721: 2692: 2411: 2382: 2324: 2268: 2203: 2160: 2058: 1966: 1928: 1596: 1555: 1534:-- but they are indeed a relevant and notable sign of Gupta-related activity. 1511: 1476: 1428: 1413: 1344: 1194: 1141: 1068: 1013: 973: 922: 862: 707: 635: 547: 344: 239: 124: 3161:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110212201320/http://www.aif.org/who-we-are.html

963:

to support your "should be mentioned twice". Do you have anything to back it?

817:] The anchor (#History and formation) is no longer available because it was 1200:

I agree with your areas to tackle so let's do that in the following format:

1762:

On the original concern of this section: "yes, we are deleting", per movie

914:

guarantee I'd cross-check every item. Maybe someone else will take it on.

629: 602: 2461:

then it should be another paragraph or two. Something to think about. --

530: 509: 243: 2379:

Raj Rajaratnam/Galleon Group/Anil Kumar/Rajat Gupta insider trading cases

2196:

Raj Rajaratnam/Galleon Group/Anil Kumar/Rajat Gupta insider trading cases

1777:

Found this on friendsofrajat.com. Should I merge with the lists we have?

262: 2198:

instead of the non-Kumar one just above): Anyone else please comment at

1465:

I'd be fine with a "highlights" but choices are hard and there was push

542:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 2974: 1700:

Are we deleting stuff? I hope not. We're moving a lot of it to the new

813:

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

777: 543: 369: 3081:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

3164: 1727:. Much of that needs to be condensed or deleted. Also I am moving 1150:

Redundancy (career lists, spinning off separate lists into articles)

661:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 3282: 3250: 3130: 3114: 3001: 2986: 2961: 2939: 2922: 2888: 2870: 2852: 2835: 2816: 2800: 2785: 2769: 2747: 2729: 2714: 2700: 2668: 2654: 2639: 2624: 2603: 2586: 2568: 2549: 2533: 2511: 2470: 2454: 2419: 2407: 2390: 2339: 2317: 2299: 2276: 2252: 2211: 2189: 2168: 2112: 2084: 2066: 1974: 1956: 1936: 1904: 1890: 1832:

PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF INDIA - Founding Chairman for 5+ years

1757: 1690: 1645: 1628: 1610: 1585: 1563: 1545: 1519: 1504: 1484: 1459: 1436: 1421: 1387: 1370: 1352: 1244: 1180: 1130: 1094: 1076: 1037: 1021: 1001: 981: 946: 930: 892: 870: 154:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1264:

I've commented, gently I hope, on the resultant duplication above.

658: 445: 424: 1869:

ADVISORY COUNCIL OF THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA - Council Member

1823:

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - Trustee; Advisor to President Sonensheim

2895: 2681:"Corrected source that actually reflects the wiretap objections" 2481:

he's accused of (the main section: the charges and history) and

1259:. And welcome! Monster. I appreciate your good new energy here. 2679:

For the record, the original cite covered the edit just fine. (

1783:

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (DELHI) - B. Tech; Class of ‘71

1333:. It's not been easy and, again, it's central to RGupta's bio. 3043: 2306:

Raj Rajaratnam/Galleon Group/Rajat Gupta insider trading cases

2156:

Raj Rajaratnam/Galleon Group/Rajat Gupta insider trading cases

1863:

AMERICA INDIA FOUNDATION - Founding Co- Chairman for 10 years

1063:

On. (And someday maybe I'll tackle the duplication; like just

787: 780: 738: 57: 38:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

15: 1658:

http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2776

3049:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

1799:

INDIAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS - Founding Chairman for 12+ years

706: 179: 3312:

Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles

2738:

Yes, I read it again and the change looks good. Thanks. --

3155:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2360:). For my full opinion on the title question, please see 368:, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to 3307:

Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles

3014:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

2013:

I want to clarify that I mentioned Martha Stewart above

918: 3261: 3019: 2952:. I can live with it though see it as a bit of a loss. 2949: 2680: 2023: 1997: 1107:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not

854: 2477:

Great -- for me there's a logical distinction between

2057:

will be well-considered as we go forward. Best, all.

1083:

Doesn't feel like there's a good/easy solution here.

2791:

just deleting it. Still open to discussion. Cheers.

261:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3197:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2176:I agree with the title, I commented on the Talk of 1860:UNITED NATIONS - Advisor to Kofi Anan on UN reform 1857:ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION - Board Member for 3+ years 3412:Start-Class West Bengal articles of Low-importance 2257:Good catch. Hopefully corrected. I have found the 2126:well enough and feel for all the Sheens/Estevezes 1927:than I but I am wary. Free advice, right? Cheers. 467:Knowledge:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 3367:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles 1786:HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL - MBA; CLASS OF ‘73 1335:This bit on My's talk page I've just stumbled on. 1307:get in trouble (as a world; as an encyclopedia). 470:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 3377:Low-importance Finance & Investment articles 1986: 1263: 657:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 2103:and I'm open to other titles for the entry. -- 3183:This message was posted before February 2018. 2120:Comparison to CSheen is a joke, right? I like 952: 560:Knowledge:WikiProject Finance & Investment 3382:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles 3372:Start-Class Finance & Investment articles 2362:Talk:Insider Trading 2011#Inspiration; title? 2200:Talk:Insider Trading 2011#Inspiration; title? 1910:Basically agreeing with Mike, I'd say to use 563:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment 8: 3397:Start-Class India articles of Low-importance 3332:Low-importance WikiProject Business articles 3256:Removing section on continuing ties with MGI 2049:In conclusion, I don't feel the article has 2037:world. I've now gotten myself back into the 1275:Fine tune but not rebuild right now. On the 3317:Politics and government work group articles 61: 2970:Seemingly unrelated link, Template removed 597: 504: 419: 312: 207: 89: 3327:Start-Class WikiProject Business articles 3143:I have just modified 2 external links on 2992:no-discussion Template. Discussion open. 2691:: Each edit gets stored forever. Cheers. 2194:Thanks. Re: the title change (perhaps to 955:. Consider my current effort "on a fresh 2443:discuss here before changing or moving. 878:a few reasons behind it: didn't want to 454:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 1924: 1763: 1121:. I will make some appropriate edits. 1101:Entry getting away from Wiki Guidelines 599: 506: 421: 314: 209: 91: 3123:2601:181:8000:D6D0:A8C8:79CC:EA45:54A2 1322:it has somewhere else to go, I'd say. 191:the politics and government work group 3362:Low-importance Crime-related articles 3061:to let others know (documentation at 937:career in this hybrid list+para way. 7: 2975:http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1017657/ 1707:What else should I be helping with? 1681:is in order pending the outcome. -- 651:This article is within the scope of 539:WikiProject Finance & Investment 536:This article is within the scope of 451:This article is within the scope of 360:This article is within the scope of 255:This article is within the scope of 140:This article is within the scope of 3407:Low-importance West Bengal articles 3297:Biography articles of living people 2024:A mention of MMilken's Wiki article 1998:recent revision history of the page 80:It is of interest to the following 3357:Start-Class Crime-related articles 3165:http://www.aif.org/who-we-are.html 2041:area of my concern (see above and 2017:primarily as an example of a Wiki 1229:Personal Life - this can stay also 1169:Look forward to working with you! 14: 3147:. Please take a moment to review 3018:. Please take a moment to review 907:List of professional affiliations 566:Finance & Investment articles 3417:WikiProject West Bengal articles 3402:Start-Class West Bengal articles 3072: 2138:Gupta? Well, to each their own. 1343:My two cents, to start. Cheers. 1049:was so much duplication evident 791: 743: 638: 628: 601: 529: 508: 444: 423: 347: 337: 316: 242: 232: 211: 127: 117: 93: 62: 21:This article must adhere to the 3347:Low-importance Chicago articles 2377:on that title change either to 2221: 1766:at least. "Mike?", I ask again. 1696:I hope we aren't deleting stuff 693:This article has been rated as 580:This article has been rated as 487:This article has been rated as 402:This article has been rated as 295:This article has been rated as 164:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 3322:WikiProject Biography articles 3302:Start-Class biography articles 3042:Attempted to fix sourcing for 1695: 1285:is the one that most comes to 1053:it would looked even sillier. 275:Knowledge:WikiProject Business 167:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 3392:Low-importance India articles 3337:WikiProject Business articles 2420:22:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1987:"Eliminate some duplication?" 1314:The Rajaratnam connection is 893:18:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 871:02:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 715:This article is supported by 554:and see a list of open tasks. 461:and see a list of open tasks. 382:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago 281:WikiProject Business articles 278:Template:WikiProject Business 269:and see a list of open tasks. 188:This article is supported by 24:biographies of living persons 3352:WikiProject Chicago articles 3342:Start-Class Chicago articles 2222:Please don't break backlinks 2180:for a possible addition. -- 961:in this style-manual article 464:Crime and Criminal Biography 431:Crime and Criminal Biography 385:Template:WikiProject Chicago 152:contribute to the discussion 3283:10:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 3251:01:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC) 3044:http://omnivc.com/Team2.htm 2669:16:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 2655:16:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 2640:15:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 2625:20:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 1836:Board Member for 10+ years 1793:HUMANITARIAN CONTRIBUTIONS 1677:framing another entry like 901:Eliminate some duplication? 673:Knowledge:WikiProject India 36:must be removed immediately 3438: 3422:WikiProject India articles 3387:Start-Class India articles 3214:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3140:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3115:07:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 3036:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 3011:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3002:16:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 2987:15:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 2962:23:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC) 2940:17:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2923:17:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2889:17:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2871:16:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2853:16:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2836:16:28, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2817:16:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 2801:03:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC) 2786:00:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC) 2770:23:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC) 1038:22:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 1022:21:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 1002:20:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 982:02:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 699:project's importance scale 676:Template:WikiProject India 586:project's importance scale 493:project's importance scale 408:project's importance scale 301:project's importance scale 2408:A follow-on exchange here 1985:As a counterweight to my 1475:the list? I think maybe. 947:23:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 931:18:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 714: 692: 623: 579: 524: 486: 439: 401: 374:Chicago metropolitan area 332: 294: 227: 187: 112: 88: 3131:23:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC) 2948:native name was removed 2748:17:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 2730:16:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 2715:23:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 2701:23:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 2604:16:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2587:01:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2569:01:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2550:21:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 2534:02:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 2512:01:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2471:21:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 2455:22:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 2391:21:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 2340:18:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2318:17:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2300:13:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2277:18:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2253:23:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2238:21:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2212:21:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 2190:00:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2169:18:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2144:"everybody was doing it" 2113:23:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2085:20:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2067:20:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1975:18:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 1957:20:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1937:20:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1905:17:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1891:01:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1758:20:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1741:16:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1719:01:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1691:19:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 1646:19:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 1629:00:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 1611:00:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 1593:Ron Daniel (businessman) 1586:19:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 1564:18:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 1546:20:40, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1520:21:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 1505:18:33, 10 May 2012 (UTC) 1485:21:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 1460:18:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC) 1445:Philanthropic activities 1437:21:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 557:Finance & Investment 516:Finance & Investment 3136:External links modified 3007:External links modified 2500:Thx for all your work! 1422:20:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC) 1407:on this one. Good luck. 1388:18:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC) 1371:10:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 1353:01:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC) 1245:12:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 1181:02:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 1131:10:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 1095:21:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC) 1077:19:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC) 718:WikiProject West Bengal 106:Politics and Government 1851:4. OTHER INSTITUTIONS 1666:McKinsey & Company 1294:: Then it was (maybe) 953:earlier, above section 711: 473:Crime-related articles 184: 70:This article is rated 1981:Too much elimination? 855:Eleven years for Raj. 710: 183: 143:WikiProject Biography 3195:regular verification 2899:"maybe not 'major'" 2437:Insider Trading 2011 2430:Relationship section 2358:Insider Trading 2011 2356:article (now titled 2178:Insider Trading 2011 2101:Insider Trading 2011 2055:Insider Trading 2011 1729:Insider Trading 2011 1725:Insider Trading 2011 1702:Insider Trading 2011 1674:Insider Trading 2011 1412:Thanks to you both. 258:WikiProject Business 3185:After February 2018 3053:parameter below to 2683:: Do I detect some 2243:Sorry about that -- 1839:3. GLOBAL BUSINESS 1595:. He also mentored 1296:Charles E. Mitchell 1252:Hi Monster and My, 1044:Another ... thought 919:that 'B' assessment 364:WikiProject Chicago 3239:InternetArchiveBot 3190:InternetArchiveBot 1873:CORPORATE BOARDS: 1780:CAREER HIGHLIGHTS 1652:Controversy Update 1491:Friendsofrajat.com 712: 185: 170:biography articles 76:content assessment 3215: 3113: 2259:"What links here" 2006:my thoughts there 1826:2. GLOBAL HEALTH 1773:Career highlights 1679:SEC v. Rajaratnam 1672:. The new entry 1257:for the reach out 847: 846: 833:deleted by a user 826:deleted by a user 819:deleted by a user 808:in most browsers. 786: 785: 767: 766: 737: 736: 733: 732: 729: 728: 654:WikiProject India 596: 595: 592: 591: 503: 502: 499: 498: 418: 417: 414: 413: 311: 310: 307: 306: 206: 205: 202: 201: 56: 55: 3429: 3260:I have removed ( 3249: 3240: 3213: 3212: 3191: 3109: 3108:Talk to my owner 3104: 3079: 3076: 3075: 3068: 3037: 3029: 2824:propose deleting 2583: 2578: 2565: 2560: 2530: 2525: 2518:Section ordering 2508: 2503: 2451: 2446: 2336: 2331: 2289: 2283:Affiliation List 2234: 2229: 2081: 2076: 2045:). We shall see. 1953: 1948: 1887: 1882: 1754: 1749: 1715: 1710: 1625: 1620: 1607: 1602: 1542: 1537: 1384: 1379: 1300:Ferdinand Pecora 1192: 1177: 1172: 1091: 1086: 841:Reporting errors 795: 794: 788: 781: 758: 757: 747: 739: 681: 680: 677: 674: 671: 648: 643: 642: 641: 632: 625: 624: 619: 616: 605: 598: 568: 567: 564: 561: 558: 533: 526: 525: 520: 512: 505: 475: 474: 471: 468: 465: 448: 441: 440: 435: 427: 420: 390: 389: 388:Chicago articles 386: 383: 380: 357: 352: 351: 350: 341: 334: 333: 328: 320: 313: 283: 282: 279: 276: 273: 252: 247: 246: 236: 229: 228: 223: 215: 208: 172: 171: 168: 165: 162: 148:join the project 137: 135:Biography portal 132: 131: 130: 121: 114: 113: 108: 97: 90: 73: 67: 66: 58: 44:this noticeboard 16: 3437: 3436: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3287: 3286: 3258: 3243: 3238: 3206: 3199:have permission 3189: 3153:this simple FaQ 3138: 3112: 3107: 3077: 3073: 3062: 3031: 3023: 3009: 2972: 2758: 2677: 2675:Good to be back 2612: 2581: 2576: 2563: 2558: 2528: 2523: 2520: 2506: 2501: 2449: 2444: 2432: 2351:Raj Rajaratnam 2334: 2329: 2287: 2285: 2232: 2227: 2224: 2079: 2074: 1983: 1951: 1946: 1885: 1880: 1775: 1752: 1747: 1713: 1708: 1698: 1654: 1623: 1618: 1605: 1600: 1574: 1540: 1535: 1493: 1447: 1382: 1377: 1190: 1175: 1170: 1103: 1089: 1084: 1046: 917:Maybe a way to 903: 852: 843: 811: 810: 809: 792: 782: 776: 752: 678: 675: 672: 669: 668: 644: 639: 637: 617: 611: 565: 562: 559: 556: 555: 518: 472: 469: 466: 463: 462: 433: 387: 384: 381: 378: 377: 353: 348: 346: 326: 280: 277: 274: 271: 270: 250:Business portal 248: 241: 221: 169: 166: 163: 160: 159: 133: 128: 126: 103: 74:on Knowledge's 71: 12: 11: 5: 3435: 3433: 3425: 3424: 3419: 3414: 3409: 3404: 3399: 3394: 3389: 3384: 3379: 3374: 3369: 3364: 3359: 3354: 3349: 3344: 3339: 3334: 3329: 3324: 3319: 3314: 3309: 3304: 3299: 3289: 3288: 3257: 3254: 3233: 3232: 3225: 3178: 3177: 3169:Added archive 3167: 3159:Added archive 3137: 3134: 3119: 3105: 3099: 3098: 3091: 3047: 3046: 3022:. You may add 3008: 3005: 2971: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2820: 2819: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2757: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2733: 2732: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2657: 2642: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2590: 2589: 2572: 2571: 2553: 2552: 2519: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2497: 2496: 2488: 2487: 2474: 2473: 2431: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2343: 2342: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2263: 2262: 2255: 2223: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2088: 2087: 2047: 2046: 2039:reputation.com 2029: 2028: 2010: 2009: 1982: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1940: 1939: 1872: 1792: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1697: 1694: 1670:Raj Rajaratnam 1653: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1632: 1631: 1614: 1613: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1549: 1548: 1523: 1522: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1409: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1399:reputation.com 1359:Martha Stewart 1283:Martha Stewart 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1213:Michael Milken 1209:Raj Rajaratnam 1198: 1184: 1183: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1138: 1115:Michael Milken 1111:Raj Rajaratnam 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1025: 1024: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 987: 986: 985: 984: 967: 966: 965: 964: 921:, eh? Cheers. 905:Specifically, 902: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 851: 848: 845: 844: 838: 837: 836: 829: 822: 806:case-sensitive 800: 799: 798: 796: 784: 783: 778: 774: 772: 769: 768: 765: 764: 754: 753: 748: 742: 735: 734: 731: 730: 727: 726: 723:Low-importance 713: 703: 702: 695:Low-importance 691: 685: 684: 682: 679:India articles 650: 649: 633: 621: 620: 618:Low‑importance 606: 594: 593: 590: 589: 582:Low-importance 578: 572: 571: 569: 552:the discussion 534: 522: 521: 519:Low‑importance 513: 501: 500: 497: 496: 489:Low-importance 485: 479: 478: 476: 459:the discussion 449: 437: 436: 434:Low‑importance 428: 416: 415: 412: 411: 404:Low-importance 400: 394: 393: 391: 359: 358: 355:Chicago portal 342: 330: 329: 327:Low‑importance 321: 309: 308: 305: 304: 297:Low-importance 293: 287: 286: 284: 267:the discussion 254: 253: 237: 225: 224: 222:Low‑importance 216: 204: 203: 200: 199: 196:Low-importance 186: 176: 175: 173: 139: 138: 122: 110: 109: 98: 86: 85: 79: 68: 54: 53: 49:this help page 33:poorly sourced 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3434: 3423: 3420: 3418: 3415: 3413: 3410: 3408: 3405: 3403: 3400: 3398: 3395: 3393: 3390: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3380: 3378: 3375: 3373: 3370: 3368: 3365: 3363: 3360: 3358: 3355: 3353: 3350: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3333: 3330: 3328: 3325: 3323: 3320: 3318: 3315: 3313: 3310: 3308: 3305: 3303: 3300: 3298: 3295: 3294: 3292: 3285: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3270: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3255: 3253: 3252: 3247: 3242: 3241: 3230: 3226: 3223: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3210: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3186: 3181: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3141: 3135: 3133: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3103: 3096: 3092: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3070: 3066: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3045: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3027: 3021: 3017: 3012: 3006: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2989: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2969: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2932:Monstermike99 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2898: 2897: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2881:Monstermike99 2878: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2859: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2845:Monstermike99 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2809:Monstermike99 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2778:Monstermike99 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2756:"Native name" 2755: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2740:Monstermike99 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2707:Monstermike99 2703: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2643: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2617:Monstermike99 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596:Monstermike99 2592: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2566: 2555: 2554: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2542:Monstermike99 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2499: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463:Monstermike99 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2452: 2442: 2438: 2429: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2354: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2326: 2323:See above -- 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2310:Monstermike99 2307: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2292:Monstermike99 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2265: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2245:Monstermike99 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2182:Monstermike99 2179: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2139: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105:Monstermike99 2102: 2097: 2096:Charlie Sheen 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2031: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1988: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1958: 1954: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1913: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1897:Monstermike99 1893: 1892: 1888: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1855: 1852: 1849: 1846: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1812: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1800: 1797: 1796:1. EDUCATION 1794: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1772: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733:Monstermike99 1730: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1705: 1703: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1683:Monstermike99 1680: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1662:Galleon Group 1659: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1638:Monstermike99 1634: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1616: 1615: 1612: 1608: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578:Monstermike99 1571: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1497:Monstermike99 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452:Monstermike99 1444: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363:Monstermike99 1360: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1323: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1308: 1306: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1278: 1272: 1269: 1265: 1260: 1258: 1253: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1237:Monstermike99 1233: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1201: 1199: 1196: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1168: 1165: 1158: 1156:Less "news-y" 1155: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123:Monstermike99 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1052: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 983: 979: 975: 971: 970: 969: 968: 962: 958: 954: 950: 949: 948: 944: 940: 935: 934: 933: 932: 928: 924: 920: 915: 912: 908: 900: 894: 890: 886: 881: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 849: 842: 834: 830: 827: 823: 820: 816: 815: 814: 807: 803: 797: 790: 789: 771: 770: 763: 760: 759: 756: 755: 751: 746: 741: 740: 724: 721:(assessed as 720: 719: 709: 705: 704: 700: 696: 690: 687: 686: 683: 666: 665: 660: 656: 655: 647: 636: 634: 631: 627: 626: 622: 615: 610: 607: 604: 600: 587: 583: 577: 574: 573: 570: 553: 549: 545: 541: 540: 535: 532: 528: 527: 523: 517: 514: 511: 507: 494: 490: 484: 481: 480: 477: 460: 456: 455: 450: 447: 443: 442: 438: 432: 429: 426: 422: 409: 405: 399: 396: 395: 392: 375: 371: 367: 366: 365: 356: 345: 343: 340: 336: 335: 331: 325: 322: 319: 315: 302: 298: 292: 289: 288: 285: 268: 264: 260: 259: 251: 245: 240: 238: 235: 231: 230: 226: 220: 217: 214: 210: 197: 194:(assessed as 193: 192: 182: 178: 177: 174: 157: 156:documentation 153: 149: 145: 144: 136: 125: 123: 120: 116: 115: 111: 107: 102: 99: 96: 92: 87: 83: 77: 69: 65: 60: 59: 51: 50: 45: 41: 37: 34: 30: 26: 25: 20: 18: 17: 3271: 3259: 3237: 3234: 3209:source check 3188: 3182: 3179: 3142: 3139: 3118: 3100: 3080: 3071: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3048: 3013: 3010: 2990: 2973: 2945: 2910: 2905: 2901:i.e. further 2900: 2894: 2857: 2823: 2821: 2759: 2704: 2689:server farms 2678: 2613: 2521: 2492: 2482: 2478: 2440: 2433: 2403: 2374: 2352: 2303: 2286: 2225: 2153: 2147: 2140: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2122: 2119: 2050: 2048: 2038: 2034: 2018: 2014: 1991: 1984: 1920: 1916: 1911: 1894: 1878: 1875: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1859: 1856: 1853: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1841: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1828: 1825: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1795: 1791: 1788: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1722: 1706: 1699: 1655: 1575: 1494: 1471: 1466: 1448: 1398: 1394: 1374: 1356: 1342: 1339: 1330: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1315: 1313: 1309: 1304: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1273: 1267: 1261: 1255:Thanks, My, 1254: 1251: 1104: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1055: 1050: 1047: 916: 904: 858: 853: 812: 804:Anchors are 801: 749: 716: 694: 664:project page 662: 652: 646:India portal 581: 537: 488: 452: 403: 362: 361: 296: 256: 189: 141: 82:WikiProjects 47: 35: 28: 22: 3145:Rajat Gupta 3065:Sourcecheck 3016:Rajat Gupta 2610:Affiliation 2051:necessarily 1925:of the site 1912:friends.com 1532:WP:COATRACK 1268:inclination 1217:Ivan Boesky 1119:Ivan Boesky 880:WP:COATRACK 614:West Bengal 72:Start-class 3291:Categories 3246:Report bug 2913:. Cheers. 2661:Vistawhite 2486:something. 2404:Postscript 2325:User:Swliv 2202:. Thanks. 2154:How about 1597:Anil Kumar 1528:WP:PEACOCK 1331:vice versa 1292:Depression 1159:what else? 1153:Shortening 1142:User:Swliv 857:... I was 548:Investment 3229:this tool 3222:this tool 3095:this tool 3088:this tool 2632:Stlamanda 1993:in spades 1065:eliminate 859:surprised 762:Archive 1 161:Biography 101:Biography 40:libellous 3235:Cheers.— 3101:Cheers.— 3026:cbignore 2911:deletion 2267:Cheers. 750:Archives 272:Business 263:business 219:Business 3275:Martinp 3149:my edit 3111::Online 3051:checked 3020:my edit 2685:sarcasm 2375:comment 2019:article 1921:friends 1668:, even 1636:that.-- 1572:Mentors 911:Summary 835:before. 828:before. 821:before. 697:on the 584:on the 544:Finance 491:on the 406:on the 379:Chicago 372:or the 370:Chicago 324:Chicago 299:on the 3059:failed 3034:nobots 2647:Rjp422 2441:Please 2353:et al. 1305:really 1205:WP:NOT 1030:My2011 994:My2011 957:palate 939:My2011 885:My2011 850:Pshaw! 78:scale. 2994:Swliv 2979:Swliv 2954:Swliv 2915:Swliv 2863:Swliv 2828:Swliv 2793:Swliv 2762:Swliv 2722:Swliv 2693:Swliv 2540:OK?-- 2493:maybe 2412:Swliv 2383:Swliv 2269:Swliv 2204:Swliv 2161:Swliv 2128:et c. 2123:2 1/2 2059:Swliv 1967:Swliv 1929:Swliv 1917:about 1879:thx, 1764:above 1556:Swliv 1512:Swliv 1477:Swliv 1472:could 1429:Swliv 1414:Swliv 1395:there 1345:Swliv 1320:until 1277:other 1223:long. 1195:Swliv 1069:Swliv 1051:there 1014:Swliv 974:Swliv 923:Swliv 863:Swliv 670:India 659:India 609:India 3279:talk 3127:talk 3069:). 3055:true 2998:talk 2983:talk 2958:talk 2950:here 2936:talk 2919:talk 2896:i.e. 2885:talk 2867:talk 2849:talk 2832:talk 2813:talk 2797:talk 2782:talk 2766:talk 2744:talk 2726:talk 2711:talk 2697:talk 2665:talk 2651:talk 2636:talk 2621:talk 2600:talk 2585:) | 2582:talk 2567:) | 2564:talk 2546:talk 2532:) | 2529:talk 2510:) | 2507:talk 2479:what 2467:talk 2453:) | 2450:talk 2416:talk 2387:talk 2338:) | 2335:talk 2314:talk 2296:talk 2273:talk 2249:talk 2236:) | 2233:talk 2208:talk 2186:talk 2165:talk 2132:that 2109:talk 2083:) | 2080:talk 2063:talk 2043:here 2027:too. 1971:talk 1955:) | 1952:talk 1933:talk 1919:the 1901:talk 1889:) | 1886:talk 1756:) | 1753:talk 1737:talk 1717:) | 1714:talk 1687:talk 1664:and 1642:talk 1627:) | 1624:talk 1609:) | 1606:talk 1582:talk 1560:talk 1544:) | 1541:talk 1516:talk 1501:talk 1481:talk 1456:talk 1433:talk 1418:talk 1386:) | 1383:talk 1367:talk 1349:talk 1298:and 1241:talk 1215:and 1193:and 1179:) | 1176:talk 1127:talk 1117:and 1093:) | 1090:talk 1073:talk 1034:talk 1018:talk 998:talk 978:talk 943:talk 927:talk 889:talk 867:talk 802:Tip: 546:and 150:and 3203:RfC 3173:to 3163:to 3057:or 2946:all 2906:now 2858:All 2483:who 2373:To 2146:-- 2015:not 1584:) 1530:or 1467:for 1458:) 1189:Hi 689:Low 576:Low 483:Low 398:Low 291:Low 29:BLP 3293:: 3281:) 3216:. 3211:}} 3207:{{ 3129:) 3067:}} 3063:{{ 3032:{{ 3028:}} 3024:{{ 3000:) 2985:) 2960:) 2938:) 2921:) 2887:) 2869:) 2851:) 2834:) 2815:) 2799:) 2784:) 2768:) 2746:) 2728:) 2713:) 2699:) 2667:) 2653:) 2638:) 2623:) 2615:-- 2602:) 2577:My 2559:My 2548:) 2524:My 2502:My 2469:) 2445:My 2439:. 2418:) 2410:. 2406:: 2389:) 2330:My 2316:) 2298:) 2288:My 2275:) 2251:) 2228:My 2210:) 2188:) 2167:) 2136:v. 2111:) 2075:My 2065:) 2035:my 1973:) 1947:My 1935:) 1903:) 1881:My 1748:My 1739:) 1709:My 1689:) 1644:) 1619:My 1601:My 1599:. 1562:) 1536:My 1518:) 1503:) 1483:) 1435:) 1420:) 1378:My 1369:) 1351:) 1316:so 1287:my 1243:) 1211:, 1191:My 1171:My 1129:) 1113:, 1085:My 1075:) 1036:) 1020:) 1000:) 980:) 945:) 929:) 891:) 869:) 725:). 612:: 198:). 104:: 3277:( 3266:, 3248:) 3244:( 3231:. 3224:. 3125:( 3097:. 3090:. 3078:Y 2996:( 2981:( 2956:( 2934:( 2917:( 2883:( 2865:( 2847:( 2830:( 2811:( 2795:( 2780:( 2764:( 2742:( 2724:( 2709:( 2695:( 2663:( 2649:( 2634:( 2619:( 2598:( 2579:( 2561:( 2544:( 2526:( 2504:( 2465:( 2447:( 2414:( 2385:( 2332:( 2312:( 2294:( 2271:( 2247:( 2230:( 2206:( 2184:( 2163:( 2148:I 2107:( 2077:( 2061:( 2008:. 1969:( 1949:( 1931:( 1899:( 1883:( 1750:( 1735:( 1711:( 1685:( 1640:( 1621:( 1603:( 1580:( 1558:( 1538:( 1514:( 1499:( 1479:( 1454:( 1431:( 1416:( 1380:( 1365:( 1347:( 1239:( 1219:. 1173:( 1125:( 1087:( 1071:( 1032:( 1016:( 996:( 976:( 941:( 925:( 887:( 865:( 701:. 667:. 588:. 495:. 410:. 376:. 303:. 158:. 84:: 52:. 27:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index