Knowledge

Talk:Reliability of - Knowledge

Source 📝

351: 627: 230: 180: 74: 583: 53: 708: 557: 397: 22: 859:. We might as well replace articles by screenshots of them. And even if we really want an image instead of text pointing out some of the interesting changes, we could at least take a more recent diff, where you actually see easily the changes and you don't have to fish through four paragraphs of text to see the point. — 800:
have that quality in addition to being an appropriate illustration for the article. I say dump the Klee-Irwin.gif (or move it elsewhere in the article if it has some redeeming quality that escapes me) and let the South American coati/Brazilian aardvark lead. Cheers!
406:
for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
777:
Just my two cents, but the first image seems more decorative than anything. At any rate, might as well put the WP home page, a random diff has no specific link with our reliability. —
837:
It doesn't seem so. It is a very extreme example of the removal of damaging facts, replacing them with PR fluff. I will return it; you didn't even put the coati at the top.
96: 934: 919: 135: 125: 929: 924: 670: 665: 660: 653: 648: 643: 735: 896: 914: 403: 261: 892: 297: 760: 100: 90: 81: 58: 864: 820: 782: 885: 537: 33: 688: 606: 360: 601: 739: 591: 514: 491: 468: 445: 422: 313: 253: 188: 305: 301: 714: 317: 309: 158: 806: 325: 249: 39: 293: 271: 184: 21: 756: 868: 824: 786: 402:
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
842: 802: 566:
the page to discuss whether a source in an article is reliable. If you want to do that, go to
350: 242: 626: 752: 229: 908: 860: 816: 778: 567: 900: 872: 846: 828: 810: 796:
Agreed, except to say the image in question isn't even decorative! The second image
790: 764: 743: 838: 356:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
365: 73: 52: 274:- e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc? 582: 378: 292:
Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g.
162: 86: 751:
Please be more specific about what you would like us to change.
702: 620: 577: 551: 391: 345: 170: 151: 15: 85:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's encyclopedic 541: 533: 529: 525: 518: 510: 506: 502: 495: 487: 483: 479: 472: 464: 460: 456: 449: 441: 437: 433: 426: 418: 414: 410: 212: 206: 200: 194: 891:
Quite interesting, I used it in the article a little.
89:. If you would like to participate, please visit the 320:
etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see
361:Study: Knowledge Pretty Accurate, But Hard to Read 815:I'll go on with it, then, if it's not just me. — 250:Criticism of Knowledge#Systemic bias in coverage 699:Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2023 682:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 570:or the talk page of the article in question. 395: 379:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00726-1 372:Messer-Kruse on "verifiability, not truth" 328:and clarify the scope of the two articles. 322:Talk:Reliability of Knowledge#Article name 298:quality and comprehensiveness of Knowledge 237:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 47: 375:Bruckman's Should You Believe Knowledge? 935:Knowledge pages referenced by the press 103:, even on topics relating to Knowledge. 49: 19: 692:when more than 3 sections are present. 526:Reliability of Knowledge#Liberal bias 7: 79:This article is within the scope of 602:"Why does Knowledge (mostly) work?" 600:Eoin O'Carroll (October 11, 2018). 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 920:Top-importance Knowledge articles 686:may be automatically archived by 592:mentioned by a media organization 321: 254:Reliability of Knowledge#Coverage 930:Knowledge pages with to-do lists 706: 625: 581: 555: 349: 277:Find references where called for 228: 178: 72: 51: 20: 130:This article has been rated as 110:Knowledge:WikiProject Knowledge 925:WikiProject Knowledge articles 272:Knowledge assessment of itself 113:Template:WikiProject Knowledge 1: 901:16:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 538:Ideological bias on Knowledge 270:Should there be something on 886:Can You Trust Dr. Knowledge? 765:03:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC) 744:01:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC) 729:to reactivate your request. 717:has been answered. Set the 161:of this article appears in 951: 915:B-Class Knowledge articles 136:project's importance scale 791:14:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 607:Christian Science Monitor 383:other history of policies 314:perspectives on Knowledge 129: 67: 46: 873:08:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 851:An image is supposed to 847:00:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 829:17:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 811:16:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 515:Reliability of Knowledge 492:Reliability of Knowledge 469:Reliability of Knowledge 446:Reliability of Knowledge 423:Reliability of Knowledge 324:). Discuss overlap with 280:Add more recent examples 189:Reliability of Knowledge 544:) on 05:08, 22 May 2018 306:assessment of Knowledge 302:evaluation of Knowledge 689:Lowercase sigmabot III 503:Criticism of Knowledge 480:Criticism of Knowledge 457:Criticism of Knowledge 434:Criticism of Knowledge 411:Criticism of Knowledge 326:criticism of Knowledge 318:reception of Knowledge 310:appraisal of Knowledge 28:This article is rated 101:neutral point of view 97:avoid self-references 82:WikiProject Knowledge 590:This topic has been 294:quality of Knowledge 833:Have either of you 404:provide attribution 363:- - TechNewsDaily ( 95:Please remember to 893:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 869:why I did it wrong 825:why I did it wrong 787:why I did it wrong 218:Updated 2019-10-25 116:Knowledge articles 87:coverage of itself 34:content assessment 835:actually read it? 733: 732: 696: 695: 676: 675: 619: 618: 574: 573: 550: 549: 390: 389: 344: 343: 335: 334: 169: 168: 150: 149: 146: 145: 142: 141: 942: 724: 720: 710: 709: 703: 691: 640: 639: 629: 621: 611: 585: 578: 559: 558: 552: 399: 398: 392: 353: 346: 232: 225: 224: 219: 182: 181: 171: 152: 118: 117: 114: 111: 108: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 950: 949: 945: 944: 943: 941: 940: 939: 905: 904: 889: 775: 746: 736:113.160.204.217 722: 718: 707: 701: 687: 634: 615: 614: 599: 595: 556: 396: 340: 339: 336: 331: 283: 193: 179: 115: 112: 109: 106: 105: 99:and maintain a 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 948: 946: 938: 937: 932: 927: 922: 917: 907: 906: 888: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 774: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 734: 731: 730: 711: 700: 697: 694: 693: 681: 678: 677: 674: 673: 668: 663: 657: 656: 651: 646: 636: 635: 630: 624: 617: 616: 613: 612: 596: 589: 588: 586: 572: 571: 560: 548: 547: 546: 545: 522: 499: 476: 453: 430: 400: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 381: 376: 373: 370: 369:) 01 June 2010 357: 354: 342: 341: 337: 333: 332: 330: 329: 284: 282: 281: 278: 275: 267: 257: 236: 234: 233: 221: 176: 174: 167: 166: 155: 148: 147: 144: 143: 140: 139: 132:Top-importance 128: 122: 121: 119: 77: 65: 64: 62:Top‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 947: 936: 933: 931: 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 913: 912: 910: 903: 902: 898: 894: 887: 884: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 849: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 831: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 799: 795: 794: 793: 792: 788: 784: 780: 773:Remove image? 772: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 749: 748: 747: 745: 741: 737: 728: 725:parameter to 716: 712: 705: 704: 698: 690: 685: 680: 679: 672: 669: 667: 664: 662: 659: 658: 655: 652: 650: 647: 645: 642: 641: 638: 637: 633: 628: 623: 622: 609: 608: 603: 598: 597: 593: 587: 584: 580: 579: 576: 569: 565: 561: 554: 553: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 405: 401: 394: 393: 382: 380: 377: 374: 371: 368: 367: 362: 359: 358: 355: 352: 348: 347: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 289: 285: 279: 276: 273: 269: 268: 266: 264: 263: 258: 255: 251: 247: 245: 244: 239: 238: 235: 231: 227: 226: 223: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 192: 190: 186: 175: 173: 172: 164: 160: 156: 154: 153: 137: 133: 127: 124: 123: 120: 104: 102: 98: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 890: 856: 855:, not to be 852: 834: 803:Captainllama 797: 776: 726: 715:edit request 683: 631: 605: 575: 563: 364: 287: 286: 260: 259: 241: 240: 222: 215: 209: 203: 197: 183: 177: 131: 94: 91:project page 80: 40:WikiProjects 366:LiveScience 338:Priority 4 909:Categories 865:what I did 853:illustrate 821:what I did 783:what I did 719:|answered= 185:To-do list 753:Clayoquot 671:Archive 6 666:Archive 5 661:Archive 4 654:Archive 3 649:Archive 2 644:Archive 1 163:Knowledge 107:Knowledge 59:Knowledge 861:Alien333 817:Alien333 779:Alien333 761:contribs 632:Archives 562:This is 839:Johnbod 684:28 days 534:history 524:Copied 511:history 501:Copied 488:history 478:Copied 465:history 455:Copied 442:history 432:Copied 419:history 409:Copied 243:Cleanup 213:refresh 201:history 159:summary 134:on the 30:B-class 867:& 823:& 785:& 568:WP:RSN 262:Expand 248:Merge 36:scale. 723:|ans= 713:This 530:oldid 507:oldid 484:oldid 461:oldid 438:oldid 415:oldid 288:Other 252:with 207:watch 897:talk 857:read 843:talk 807:talk 798:does 757:talk 740:talk 542:diff 536:) → 519:diff 513:) → 496:diff 490:) → 473:diff 467:) → 450:diff 444:) → 427:diff 421:) → 195:edit 187:for 721:or 564:not 126:Top 911:: 899:) 871:) 845:) 827:) 809:) 789:) 763:) 759:| 742:) 727:no 604:. 532:, 509:, 486:, 463:, 440:, 417:, 316:, 312:, 308:, 304:, 300:, 296:, 157:A 93:. 895:( 863:( 841:( 819:( 805:( 781:( 755:( 738:( 610:. 594:: 540:( 528:( 521:) 517:( 505:( 498:) 494:( 482:( 475:) 471:( 459:( 452:) 448:( 436:( 429:) 425:( 413:( 290:: 265:: 256:. 246:: 216:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 191:: 165:. 138:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Knowledge
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Knowledge
coverage of itself
project page
avoid self-references
neutral point of view
Top
project's importance scale
summary
Knowledge
To-do list
Reliability of Knowledge
edit
history
watch
refresh

Cleanup
Criticism of Knowledge#Systemic bias in coverage
Reliability of Knowledge#Coverage
Expand
Knowledge assessment of itself
quality of Knowledge
quality and comprehensiveness of Knowledge
evaluation of Knowledge

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.