Talk:Render unto Caesar

923:

interpretation, which has no support whatsoever anywhere else within any of the canonical or extracaonnonical gospels. The author(s) of this passage says, "Jesus was asked the question about paying taxes in hope that he would answer "yes" or "no"." This statement is patently false. The render-unto-Caesar incident is recorded in all three synoptic gospels, Matthew 22, Mark 12, and Luke 20. The purpose of asking Jesus whether or not it was lawful, according to God's law, to pay Caesar's tax (in Matthew, Mark and Luke), and whether or not to pay the tax (in Mark only), is not stated in Matthew or Mark, perhaps by ellipsis because the purpose of the questions is evident from the context of all three gospels. However, it is stated unequivocally in the gospel of Luke, thus: "Keeping a close watch on him, they sent spies, who pretended to be sincere. They hoped to catch Jesus in something he said, so that they might hand him over to the power and authority of the governor." The governor was Pontius Pilate. As procurator or prefect, Pilate was responsible to Caesar (Rome) for the collection of Roman taxes in Judea. Asking the question whether or not to pay Caesar's tax for the stated intention of turning Jesus over to Pilate unquestionably proves that the questioners of Jesus anticipated one response and one only. They expected he would answer, "No, it is not lawful. Don't pay it!" They obviously knew he wouldn't endorse Caesar tax, for that answer would not give them cause to turn Jesus over to the authority of Pilate. The point I am making is further supported by the fact that when the religious authorities a few days later did in fact take Jesus by force and turn him over to Pilate for prosecution, one of the charges they made against him was, "'We have found this man subverting our nation. He opposes payment of taxes to Caesar...He stirs up the people all over Judea by his teaching. He started in Galilee(F) and has come all the way here.'" Furthermore, it is demeaning to the character of Jesus to suggest that he would avoid answering the question(s) in the affirmative for any reason whatsoever if he believed that Caesar's tax was in accord with God's law and should be paid. Jesus was a man of impeccable integrity. The author of this erroneous section says, "Answering "yes" would have left him open to the accusation that he was in opposition to Jewish resistance to the Roman occupation and therefore (given the assumption by the Jews that they still held privileged nation status with God at this time) against God, too." Throughout the gospels Jesus demonstrated time and again that he had no fear whatsoever of any of the many (false) accusations made against him by the chief priests, Pharisees or any others. He had previously and frequently bested these adversaries,' refuted their accusations, and left them with egg on their collective faces. He most certainly wouldn't avoid answering in the affirmative if that is what he believed. Everything else in this paragraph is negated by this false interpretation of what his enemies had in mind in asking his opinion on Caesar's tax. Signed, Ned Netterville.

647:

machines and systems that are created to control people are only going to change when we all render to him the prayers that allow God to truly take over all systems that we as humans create. For example there is a cross in the city that is on government property. There are millions of dollars used in defense of this cross but where is the conversion of heart that must do daily as Christians and people of God. What good is a cross when we do not carry our own cross with love and sacrifice for others. Let the atheist and non-believers take down the cross when our duty is to pray for those that do not believe. We give to God those prayers and the immersion of that love will over flow and over come those that do not believe. We get so stubborn about small issues when the bigger issue is flying away in front of our eyes. Our house is burning and we are worried about our possesions. Let us see beyond the possesion and pray that our Lord gives us the strength to carry our cross in a loving and sacrificial way as he did. Jesus saw how miniscule that coin was and thought, "If they only know how small this coin is compared to what I have in store for them." Lets give those coins to Caesar because God is a treasure that has an infinite amount of more importance. Sometime we see our children drop a candy and they cry. In our minds we sympathize with them but we know we have much more to give them and in the long run that piece of candy means so little. In the eternal love of God though he has compassion for us and tries to explain how meanless Caesar's thing are. God I love you and thank you for your love and the things that belong to you.

1100:

otherwise I would try adding it myself. It seems like it would fit with the content under the "Giving God the Benefit of the Doubt" subheading. Although this view is hinted at within, or similar to, some of the other portions of the article, this specific verse and evidence in Psalms seems noteworthy and interesting to me. After a few minutes of searching I've found three sources that use the verse: two are small sites and don't seem widely known or reputable, but clearly support tax resistance. The other doesn't explicitly support the view that the tax shouldn't be payed, but it seems more reputable. I don't know what standards religious articles are held to for sources on opinions based off of religious texts like this, so I don't know if any would work very well. Here they are anyways,

1031:

living in the way that Jesus prescribed there is no tribute to pay to Caesar or tax to resist. Those things only emerge to the extent one subscribes to Caesar, i.e. the state and its money. One should not participate, but to the extent one does participate then one should pay the tax as the expected costs of doing so. How could his answer have been any more clear? Likewise I think the most direct interpretation of the line is that he who would follow Jesus' way avoids this dilemma by being outside the state and not using its money. Since this seems the simplest possible interpretation, I wonder why it seems to be missing from those discussed on this page? And, in this interpretation the fact that Jesus does not have the coin is quite relevant.

1052:"Give Caesar what belongs to Caesar...etc." only appears to be ambiguous to those who don't know, as Jesus did, what belongs to God and what to Caesar. Scripture, which Jesus knew well, is not ambiguous: "The earth is the Lord's and everything in it..." (Psalm 24:1). That leaves nothing whatever to belong to and give back to Caesar, and nothing is unambiguously what Jesus meant Caesar should be given, both by those following him and others. Jesus died to save all mankind and would not abandon anyone to Caesar. 837:

matter what; while others, like the Mennonites & Quakers, believe that Christians must carefully weigh conflicting obligations before voluntarily submitting to taxation. This article tries, in part, to show how different Christians and different denominations have reconciled their understanding of Christian duties about taxation with this particular biblical episode. Please refrain from mass-deletions like the ones you have recently made. -

32: 284: 169: 148: 179: 781:" page might be a good idea, and might well absorb some of the content on this page, but I'm not convinced of the wisdom of how you divided it up and I think it needs more thought. Have you looked into Robert McGee's cross-cultural/cross-religious studies of attitudes toward tax paying and tax resistance? That might help you expand your new page beyond its current Christian-only focus. — 731:

option, but only for the disabled not the suffering and poor communities. Food is a staple of life and a certain amount a week to sustain that life should be given. Housing and shelter of course should be free if obtained. The public sector such as the roads should be free until a new technology arrives. The pavement is a crude akward backwards step to the roman style roads.

1071:" is off the wall for this article and the only reference is an esoteric soliloquy on the web about monetary policy that has nothing to do with this article. The only connection is that the soliloquy uses the term "render unto Caesar" and references this article. Unless the author can defend the insertion of this non-germane paragraph, I will edit it to remove it entirely. 117: 1169: 1143:

borrow the greater we will be obligated to the present day "Caesars". So therefore money is an earthly creation and has no divine essence or power to prosper, only God is the true source of our prosperity and faith in God as our ultimate source of life, health and prosperity is the correct way. "Caeser" can have his own, back.

274: 253: 1099:

Could we get this interpretation (that nothing is owed and that Christ may have been referencing scripture) in here? I'm absolutely uninformed on editing wiki articles and don't have the time to get up to speed, so I don't know if this view would or wouldn't be an appropriate addition to the article;

855:

I'm excluding small sects and cults from my methodology, because those groups are the most likely to literally become outlawed in the real world, outside small rural regions of the United States, which is the only place where their views are given de facto attention. Also, I would like to add that if

734:

Like I said, if the technology is there it should be free or really cheap. I find it interesting that africans care nothing about the roman way of life we live today because of there untouched culture and non-relation to slavic-european history. Why pay for the cow when you can just eat the beans.

718:

I have a few I noticed. I live with my mother because of the adam and eve situation the roman empire is giving to its citizens. The tax of utilities and bills. Basically, I am a nature born resident, whom rely on such instead of the nameless faces upon which I give monetary funds to. These aren't

1030:

It doesn't seem to me that Jesus' answer was ambiguous regarding whether the tribute should be paid or the tax resisted. His point, it seems to me, is that the question they pose pose to him is predicated on misunderstanding. It is only a dilemma to those who are not (fully) following God. For those

730:

Third, college loans should be free or reduced if the degree is not used, food should not be free. Food should be payed for somehow but at an option for the poor. They should be able to buy easily manufactured foods with low monetary value eg a 10 cent can of soup if they need. Foodstamps are an

726:

Second, trash deposal services should not be free, it takes man-power to dispose of trash, but electricity should once again be free or a yearly small tax. Electricity takes small amounts of energy per household but can also be free if the right technology is available to its residents. Eg why pay

388:

It seems to me the "perhaps significant" line should be deleted. While it just might be perhaps significant, the fact that he asked for the coin was already mentioned and this line adds nothing to the article. If the comments suggestions were elaborated to say something like "Jesus carried no money"

809:

The part about resisting taxes is also fairly irrelevant to the article because the vast majority of Christians throughout history have accepted not what their own consciences tell them, like what the libertarians do, but what the Church teaches. The global Church has always supported paying taxes,

625:

perspective, which is often hostile to taxes and government authority. However, it ought to mention some more disturbing things such as the use of the statement to justify many historically authoritarian regimes and high taxes in Catholic Europe, such as Franco's Spain, the Bourbon monarchy or even

552:

First time looking at this page, but I don't agree that the denarius in question was "doubly" blasphemous. How does it qualify as a "graven image"? I thought graven images referred to objects intended to be worshipped, not just any old picture. Tiberius certainly did not expect anyone to worship

501:

so that they understand what needs to be sourced. Also, the page does not unfold in as logical a manner as one could hope. The editors need to put themselves in the position of a reader who is unfamiliar with the material. Finally, at times the page begins to takes on a POV and a tone of colloquial

945:

Yes, there are all sorts of problems with the section. There is only one reference, and that from 1839. Also, the text doesn't really match up with the heading. The bit about "in opposition to Jewish resistance to the Roman occupation and therefore against God, too" sounds like somebody's personal

1142:

The most significant thing is that we have exactly the same situation today. The federal reserve is printing, or "counterfeiting" money without out any backing whatsoever and then loaning it to us with the requirement that we pay interest on it by means of our hard earnings. So the more money we

878:

Your methodology? Quakers and Mennonites being small sects and cults unworthy of interest? Whatever. If your new page does end up just being a duplication of the bulk of another page then, yeah, it probably should be axed. I was hoping you were just planning to use that information to get you

754:

I edited a line that says "Jesus showed compassion for tax collectors as he did to other notorious sinners, such as prostitutes." If a wikipedia article said "prostitutes are notorious sinners" or just "prostitutes are sinners," I think that would qualify as non-neutral POV, and that is what this

897:

I'm not against quoting Quakers and Mennonites per se, I'm just against presenting their views as if they were very important, extremely important. They are actually less than 1 % of all Christians, and we can only present their views after we take into account the other 99 % of Christians. The

836:

global Church," and various Christian denominations have a variety of teachings about what constitutes a legitimate taxing authority, what taxes are legitimate, and when the obligation to pay a tax might be overridden by another obligation. Some, like the Mormons, tend to support tax-paying no

646:

The truth is that Jesus acknowledges the exsistance and uses of government on earth. As people of faith though our job is to give to God what is God's. We are the lambs of God and therefore we must render our prayers to him and let God convert our souls to him. We render ourselves to him. These

922:

I plan to delete the entire section headed "Doctrinal context," along with the sub-heading, "Further information: Pharisees and Christianity." The information in the main paragraph is manifestly erroneous. By no means does the sole reference provided therein support the intendment of this

860:, then you should propose it for deletion, because it is simply intolerable to have the same exact text in two separate entries. If you don't want it deleted, then you should accept the principle that the text should not be at two places at the same time. 674:-um, true except jesus says when youre born again you are somehow not accepted to human ways, culture and civilization. You're you, belonging to this time, not some fake clone or imprint. That's soul. 1256:– Including the ellipses in the title doesn't make any more sense than including quotation marks in song titles, which of course we don't do. Other articles on phrases aren't tilted thus even when they 722:

First, why should I pay for technology that already exists. Eg plumbing and waterways. This should be free or have a very small tax yearly to support the technology. Water should be free basically.

1331:; I think most of the examples that don't use the ellipsis work as standalone phrases; this one does not. If the ellipses are a problem, maybe we should title this with the entire quotation. 626:

the Tsars of Russia. For example, the statement might be even quoted today in order to state that it is legimitate for Christians in minority situations to obey leaders that are thought to be

677:

Americans like to instigate things, except when you kill someone, you really do have a death mark on this life or the next regardless, even if its a bunch of ants there's no free ticket.

362:

Science vs Religion is perhaps the most significant meaning of this quote, and not mentioned at all on this Wiki page. Very important and potentially useful distinction. -Eric Higley

755:

sentence assumes. I changed "notorious sinners" to "vilified groups", which I think is less NNPOV and more accurate. Still, I'm not sure sentence adds anything at all to the article.

1343:. I can see why the ellipsis is there, but disagree that the quotation does not stand alone... purists in grammar may not like it, but using just this phrase is common enough. 591:

The section on "benefits if people had followed Jesus" on this question needs, AT LEAST, some citations and supporting evidence. It is widely wide in scope and presumptuous.

1265: 804:

in terms of tax resistance, because it is more than just that, it notably includes the concepts of civil allegiance, Church-State separation and political neutrality.

680:

The "truth" on Wiki needs some support more than just saying it is the truth. Where in t he gospels does Jesus acknowledge the uses of government?--Ned Netterville

43: 1443: 1104: 225: 235: 572:

The fact that the charge went undisputed at Christ’s trial doesn't necessarily mean anything. The trial was full of false accusations that went unattested. -

403:

I have read commentators who made much of this detail, but don't know off-hand of any. Perhaps this could be marked with a {who} or {Fact} tag for now. -

1448: 1385:

to the title, although many of us still have sufficient Sunday Schooling for it to look a bit truncated without this reference. No change of vote.

1458: 330: 201: 1438: 493:

for sourcing, among other things. Much of the text, including interpretations of the story and controversial claims, are unsourced and have no

340: 1433: 796:

I could expand it, it would not really be very hard to go beyond Christian perspectives. My point though is that it is wrong that the phrase

696: 1085:

Since there has been no defense offered for including this off-the-wall paragraph, with fair warning given, I deleted this paragraph today.

389:

or something like that, there would be verifiability issues. If they remain un-elaborated, they certainly don't seem encyclopedic in style.

1220:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

1463: 1129: 1110: 930: 756: 736: 598: 465: 390: 58: 533:

is original research and the authors seems to be interpreting the New Testament. It needs to be sourced, and if necessary, attributed.

192: 153: 53: 1038: 727:

for a computer without the right software? Technology causes many problems, when not available but is a source of free energy.

306: 52:

at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be

993: 1453: 1105:

http://biblelaw101.com/Other%20Law%20Related%20Articles/Is%20it%20Lawful%20to%20Give%20Tribute%20unto%20Caesar,%20or%20Not.html

1015: 49: 1315: 952: 663: 128: 1151:

It seems mostly to be trivia of the most trivial sort, and adds little or nothing that throws any light on the topic. —

857: 778: 297: 258: 31: 1369:

But that's just it... the quote does stand on its own. As a result the title, whether as is or as proposed, is both

1261: 1211: 1090: 1076: 1057: 971: 692: 777:

ADM, before you go deleting big hunks of the page wholesale, please discuss your proposed changes here. Your "

1114: 934: 760: 602: 394: 1133: 740: 461: 372: 1272:. If nothing else, we should prefer the more concise form, and not expect readers to type in the ellipses. 1042: 367:

It is perhaps significant that Jesus did not have such a coin with him but that one of his questioners did.

1184: 1086: 1072: 1053: 967: 688: 577: 558: 506:. On pages about religious topics, it is especially important to retain as much neutrality as possible. 474:

I agree with the anonymous comment above, and have nominated this as a Good Article on their suggestion.

1415: 1249: 1221: 530: 457: 449:

It covers everything anyone who came to this article could hope to find. Someone should nominate it. ;)

134: 1360:

Maybe it was titled thus because the complete saying is "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's." —

554: 1381:(as is suggested by Powers above, and a very good point IMO) than there is to add the Bible reference 659: 1034: 926: 684: 651: 594: 573: 538: 453: 879:

started on something more substantial. I wish you luck on that project and hope it turns out well.

116: 1269: 475: 184: 305:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

200:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1319: 1253: 1156: 956: 884: 842: 786: 655: 514: 408: 1390: 1374: 1348: 1238: 994:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2020:19-30&version=NIV;NASB;KJV;NKJV;ASV

810:

because that's the majority position, and that's why most people have continued to pay taxes.

1287: 1016:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2023:1-10&version=NIV;NASB;KJV;NKJV;ASV

1192: 534: 509:

If you have any questions about this review, please leave a note on my talk page. Thanks.

435: 17: 1107: 490: 503: 494: 376: 1427: 1361: 1332: 1310: 1296: 1178: 1152: 966:

With fair warning, and no defense of the section being offered, I deleted this today.

947: 907: 880: 865: 838: 819: 782: 635: 510: 404: 380: 1405: 1386: 1370: 1344: 1234: 289: 197: 1279: 1101: 498: 1414:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

1188: 279: 174: 168: 147: 902:

page is POV because it looks like a piece of unadulerated Quaker propaganda.

422:

Why is the translation of the line in Latin, when the original was in Greek?

1394: 1364: 1352: 1335: 1323: 1300: 1242: 1196: 1160: 1137: 1118: 1094: 1080: 1061: 1046: 975: 960: 938: 911: 888: 869: 846: 823: 790: 764: 744: 700: 667: 606: 581: 562: 542: 519: 478: 438: 412: 398: 383: 178: 426:

I came here to ask the same thing. The relevant Greek portion of 22:21 is

1292: 903: 861: 815: 631: 1128:

I'm just curious why this exchange is being referred to as a parable?--

715:

Problems with monetary funding: Basically the qualms about cash flow

1309:. It doesn't even usually have the ellipsis in secondary sources. 1147:

Anyone else think the "In popular culture" section is unnecessary?

302: 1004: 273: 252: 110: 630:, such as Kim Jong-il, Fidel Castro or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. 432:

Apodote oun ta Kaisaros Kaisari kai ta tou theou tôi theôi.

1210:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

301:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 428:Ἀπόδοτε οὖν τὰ Καίσαρος Καίσαρι καὶ τὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ τῷ Θεῷ. 88: 1404:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

1108:

http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/20090804_1.htm

719:

really problems, just exagerated complaints really.

196:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 62:

of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

1266:

Category:Political terminology of the United States

1224:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1418:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1260:the beginning. See, for example, the members of 497:. The editors need to spend some time reading 1102:http://www.thelordsway.net/Beliefs/render.htm 8: 247: 142: 67: 26: 735:Waste of energy and the life of a cow. -- 712:Consensus of Tax within the Roman Empire 986: 249: 144: 114: 1005:http://en.wikipedia.org/Pontius_Pilate 832:I don't think there is such thing as " 773:Discuss major changes to the page here 1444:High-importance Christianity articles 1069:Money is not for the people's benefit 531:Render_unto_Caesar...#Interpretations 44:Philosophy and religion good articles 7: 1379:title this with the entire quotation 1229:The result of the move request was: 379:carried the money bag, not Jesus. – 295:This article is within the scope of 190:This article is within the scope of 750:"Prostitutes are notorious sinners" 133:It is of interest to the following 210:Knowledge:WikiProject Christianity 25: 1449:WikiProject Christianity articles 858:religious views on tax resistance 779:Religious views on tax resistance 553:his denarii. Revising this .... 213:Template:WikiProject Christianity 1167: 568:Christ’s Trial is a poor support 445:This page is extremely well-done 282: 272: 251: 177: 167: 146: 115: 30: 335:This article has been rated as 230:This article has been rated as 1459:High-importance Bible articles 1047:17:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 642:Give way to what is the Truth. 617:The article is written from a 48:nominee, but did not meet the 1: 1439:C-Class Christianity articles 1336:01:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC) 1324:06:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC) 1301:06:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC) 1026:Ambiguity and Interpretations 745:17:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 375:may shed some light on that; 309:and see a list of open tasks. 204:and see a list of open tasks. 1434:Former good article nominees 1138:13:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1067:The short paragraph headed " 939:15:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 765:03:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 543:05:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 520:18:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 489:This page does not meet the 479:14:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 439:18:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 413:04:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 399:03:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 946:opinion/original research. 856:you don't like the article 384:11:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 315:Knowledge:WikiProject Bible 1480: 1464:WikiProject Bible articles 1395:20:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC) 1377:. There's no more need to 1365:18:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC) 1353:14:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC) 1268:, or the broader category 1243:09:30, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1064:--signed, Ned Netterville 1062:21:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 976:21:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 961:20:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 912:03:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC) 889:03:33, 8 August 2009 (UTC) 870:02:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC) 847:01:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC) 824:23:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 791:16:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 701:20:00, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 607:04:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 504:neutral, encyclopedic tone 341:project's importance scale 318:Template:WikiProject Bible 236:project's importance scale 56:. Editors may also seek a 18:Talk:Render unto Caesar... 1290:01:51, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 1262:Category:Sayings of Jesus 1119:07:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 1095:18:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 582:16:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 334: 267: 229: 162: 141: 70: 66: 1411:Please do not modify it. 1217:Please do not modify it. 1197:17:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC) 1081:04:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 668:00:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 563:21:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 193:WikiProject Christianity 1161:04:23, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 1454:C-Class Bible articles 502:writing rather than a 358:Perhaps significant... 123:This article is rated 1250:Render unto Caesar... 216:Christianity articles 50:good article criteria 96:Good article nominee 1270:Category:Quotations 185:Christianity portal 1254:Render unto Caesar 798:render unto Caesar 129:content assessment 71:Article milestones 38:Render unto Caesar 1373:and sufficiently 1291: 1289: 1037:comment added by 929:comment added by 918:Doctrinal context 704: 687:comment added by 671: 654:comment added by 609: 597:comment added by 525:Original research 517: 470: 456:comment added by 355: 354: 351: 350: 347: 346: 298:WikiProject Bible 246: 245: 242: 241: 109: 108: 105: 104: 16:(Redirected from 1471: 1413: 1286: 1284: 1273: 1219: 1182: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1049: 1018: 1013: 1007: 1002: 996: 991: 978:Ned Netterville 941: 703: 681: 670: 648: 613:Authoritarianism 592: 515: 495:inline citations 469: 450: 323: 322: 319: 316: 313: 292: 287: 286: 285: 276: 269: 268: 263: 255: 248: 218: 217: 214: 211: 208: 187: 182: 181: 171: 164: 163: 158: 150: 143: 126: 120: 119: 111: 91: 89:November 4, 2007 68: 34: 27: 21: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1409: 1280: 1215: 1205: 1176: 1168: 1166: 1149: 1126: 1087:Ned Netterville 1073:Ned Netterville 1054:Ned Netterville 1032: 1028: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1014: 1010: 1003: 999: 992: 988: 968:Ned Netterville 924: 920: 775: 752: 710: 689:Ned Netterville 682: 649: 644: 615: 589: 570: 550: 527: 487: 451: 447: 420: 360: 337:High-importance 320: 317: 314: 311: 310: 288: 283: 281: 262:High‑importance 261: 232:High-importance 215: 212: 209: 206: 205: 183: 176: 157:High‑importance 156: 127:on Knowledge's 124: 87: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1477: 1475: 1467: 1466: 1461: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1406:requested move 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1355: 1338: 1326: 1248: 1246: 1227: 1226: 1212:requested move 1206: 1204: 1203:Requested move 1201: 1200: 1199: 1148: 1145: 1125: 1122: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1008: 997: 985: 984: 980: 964: 963: 919: 916: 915: 914: 894: 893: 892: 891: 873: 872: 852: 851: 850: 849: 827: 826: 812: 811: 806: 805: 800:be understood 774: 771: 769: 751: 748: 709: 706: 643: 640: 614: 611: 588: 585: 569: 566: 549: 546: 526: 523: 486: 483: 482: 481: 446: 443: 442: 441: 419: 416: 377:Judas Iscariot 370: 369: 359: 356: 353: 352: 349: 348: 345: 344: 333: 327: 326: 324: 321:Bible articles 307:the discussion 294: 293: 277: 265: 264: 256: 244: 243: 240: 239: 228: 222: 221: 219: 202:the discussion 189: 188: 172: 160: 159: 151: 139: 138: 132: 121: 107: 106: 103: 102: 99: 92: 84: 83: 80: 77: 73: 72: 64: 63: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1476: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1429: 1419: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1401: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383:Matthew 22:21 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1277: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1225: 1223: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1180: 1174: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1146: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130:209.7.195.158 1123: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111:174.23.169.39 1109: 1106: 1103: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1083: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1025: 1017: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1001: 998: 995: 990: 987: 983: 979: 977: 973: 969: 962: 958: 954: 951: 950: 944: 943: 942: 940: 936: 932: 931:68.53.227.101 928: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 896: 895: 890: 886: 882: 877: 876: 875: 874: 871: 867: 863: 859: 854: 853: 848: 844: 840: 835: 831: 830: 829: 828: 825: 821: 817: 814: 813: 808: 807: 803: 799: 795: 794: 793: 792: 788: 784: 780: 772: 770: 767: 766: 762: 758: 757:98.192.38.248 749: 747: 746: 742: 738: 737:69.255.42.105 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 713: 707: 705: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 678: 675: 672: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 641: 639: 637: 633: 629: 624: 620: 612: 610: 608: 604: 600: 599:75.20.175.108 596: 586: 584: 583: 579: 575: 567: 565: 564: 560: 556: 548:Graven image? 547: 545: 544: 540: 536: 532: 524: 522: 521: 518: 512: 507: 505: 500: 496: 492: 485:GA quick fail 484: 480: 477: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 459: 458:64.122.208.51 455: 444: 440: 437: 433: 429: 425: 424: 423: 417: 415: 414: 410: 406: 401: 400: 396: 392: 391:98.192.38.248 386: 385: 382: 378: 374: 368: 365: 364: 363: 357: 342: 338: 332: 329: 328: 325: 308: 304: 300: 299: 291: 280: 278: 275: 271: 270: 266: 260: 257: 254: 250: 237: 233: 227: 224: 223: 220: 203: 199: 195: 194: 186: 180: 175: 173: 170: 166: 165: 161: 155: 152: 149: 145: 140: 136: 130: 122: 118: 113: 112: 100: 98: 97: 93: 90: 86: 85: 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 65: 61: 60: 55: 51: 47: 46: 45: 39: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 1410: 1403: 1382: 1378: 1371:recognisable 1357: 1340: 1328: 1311: 1306: 1281: 1275: 1257: 1247: 1230: 1228: 1216: 1209: 1172: 1150: 1141: 1127: 1098: 1084: 1068: 1066: 1051: 1029: 1011: 1000: 989: 981: 965: 948: 925:— Preceding 921: 899: 833: 801: 797: 776: 768: 753: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 714: 711: 683:— Preceding 679: 676: 673: 645: 627: 622: 618: 616: 590: 571: 555:Scrutchfield 551: 528: 508: 488: 448: 431: 427: 421: 402: 387: 371: 366: 361: 336: 296: 290:Bible portal 231: 207:Christianity 198:Christianity 191: 154:Christianity 135:WikiProjects 95: 94: 59:reassessment 57: 42: 41: 37: 1416:move review 1222:move review 1183:Agreed and 1039:98.237.4.41 1033:—Preceding 802:exclusively 650:—Preceding 623:evangelical 619:libertarian 593:—Preceding 491:GA criteria 452:—Preceding 373:John 12:4-6 54:renominated 1428:Categories 982:References 574:Alan Trick 535:Bless sins 436:Wasabe3543 101:Not listed 708:Roman Tax 628:dictators 1362:goethean 1276:Relisted 1179:Moorlock 1153:Moorlock 1124:Parable? 1035:unsigned 927:unsigned 839:Moorlock 783:Moorlock 697:contribs 685:unsigned 664:contribs 652:unsigned 595:unsigned 587:Benefits 529:Much of 511:Awadewit 476:Terraxos 466:contribs 454:unsigned 381:Tintazul 1387:Andrewa 1375:precise 1358:Comment 1345:Andrewa 1341:Support 1307:Support 1235:Jenks24 339:on the 234:on the 125:C-class 79:Process 1333:Powers 1329:Oppose 1316:Anselm 1282:Tyrol5 953:Anselm 900:Caesar 656:LOKOIN 418:Latin? 131:scale. 82:Result 40:was a 1231:moved 1189:Daask 312:Bible 303:Bible 259:Bible 1391:talk 1349:talk 1320:talk 1297:talk 1239:talk 1193:talk 1185:done 1173:Done 1157:talk 1134:talk 1115:talk 1091:talk 1077:talk 1058:talk 1043:talk 972:talk 957:talk 935:talk 908:talk 885:talk 866:talk 843:talk 820:talk 787:talk 761:talk 741:talk 693:talk 660:talk 636:talk 621:and 603:talk 578:talk 559:talk 539:talk 516:talk 499:WP:V 462:talk 409:talk 395:talk 331:High 226:High 76:Date 1408:. 1293:BDD 1258:are 904:ADM 862:ADM 834:The 816:ADM 632:ADM 1430:: 1393:) 1351:) 1322:) 1312:St 1299:) 1278:. 1274:-- 1264:, 1252:→ 1241:) 1233:. 1214:. 1195:) 1187:. 1159:) 1136:) 1117:) 1093:) 1079:) 1060:) 1045:) 974:) 959:) 949:St 937:) 910:) 887:) 868:) 845:) 822:) 789:) 763:) 743:) 699:) 695:• 666:) 662:• 638:) 605:) 580:) 561:) 541:) 513:| 468:) 464:• 434:)— 411:) 397:) 1389:( 1347:( 1318:( 1295:( 1237:( 1191:( 1181:: 1177:@ 1155:( 1132:( 1113:( 1089:( 1075:( 1056:( 1041:( 970:( 955:( 933:( 906:( 883:( 881:— 864:( 841:( 818:( 785:( 759:( 739:( 691:( 658:( 634:( 601:( 576:( 557:( 537:( 460:( 430:( 407:( 405:— 393:( 343:. 238:. 137:: 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index