1170:
disagree that
Freedom of Speech is in conflict with requiring "forgetting", but the major criticism - not present here! - is that historical behavior of a person is the BEST guide to future behavior. It is not up to the relevant jurisdiction whether or not any public behavior is "minor" or "insignificant" or "no longer relevant". That should be obvious. It is also simply obfuscatory to say that a person's 20 yr old (say) bankruptcy is or is not relevant to evaluate that person's character. Using that information to make a decision (whether it is to offer that person a job, a loan, or let him/her babysit your kids) depends on the type of decision AND the strength of the link between behavior X (then) and behavior Y (now). At least, that is a typical USA perspective, imho. (* it is also not the case that a person's professional behavior is "personal" and should be forgotten upon request.OTOH, what is public and private is much more difficult to untangle with today's on-line social media.)
375:
354:
385:
270:
249:
280:
1186:
sharing, or by pictures uploaded due to poor judgment." "Poor judgement" appears absolutely nowhere in the citation, and is an element of active propaganda denying the harm of revenge porn. I've added an NPOV marker to the whole article for now, and I don't think it should be removed without serious effort to rewrite multiple sections, which I don't currently have the energy to research myself after doing the same for the "Privacy" page.
74:
53:
526:
730:
covered this story in
October 2014 , and it was mentioned again in the Wall Street Journal blog as a risk for investors. This is an example of using the Right to be Forgotten to remove information that could be considered relevant, such as a recent director appointment in a company. Google continues to remove URLs from our site. Is this information relevant for the article?
22:
463:
163:
142:
173:
886:
It is important to note, that currently, requests made by private persons under the EU ruling for information removal are just implemented by Google on
European sub domains, such as Google.co.uk or Google.fr but not on Google.com. Thatâs not about to change, according to Eric Schmidt unless Google is
843:
The lists are updated daily, and they are going to include more countries soon. We have more than 10 million directors of 4 countries in our databases, and we have to deal with many data protection conflicts every day, including Right to be
Forgotten requests and hundreds of requests for deletion. As
729:
Google has removed hundreds of links of our website about corporate information. This information only relates to the business scope of company directors in the United
Kingdom and Spain, and it's not considered personal information under the Data Protection Acts of the two countries. Fortune Magazine
894:
I was about to correct the flaws, but then I noticed that it was almost identical to its cited source. I would have simply marked it with {{close paraphrasing}}, but the paraphrased source was unreliable, and was itself ripped from a copyrighted TechCrunch article. Even after two very thin layers
619:
I agree. I think it is POINT-y and cruel and unwise to use this photo in any encyclopedia article, and particularly this one. There is no reason to punish whoever the subject of this photo is (we have little evidence, and there is some argument that we are not even sure of the license status). I
1123:
A recent court judgement in South Africa forcing a former employee of a company to update his LinkedIn profile also exemplified the question, if companies should have control over what we do on social media. âThis was highlighted by the high court in
Pretoria yesterday in the case of a city estate
1052:
The section on Europe contains a single two-line paragraph that in a vague handwavy way says something about the
European version of this right, and then talks at length about how one party (Google) interprets and handles that. I'm not sure that explains *anything* at all about the European right,
603:
It worries me that this is a so-called self-referential edit protecting
Knowledge's interests (as perceived by some and not necessarily excluding one of its founders). Needless to say I have no intention whatsoever of intervening, forewarned by others of the ruinous effect of intervening in such
1169:
This is an awful article. It confuses and for some unknown reason fails to distinguish between personal behavior* (or images, facts) and private behavior (and images, facts, etc.). It describes the subject concept incorrectly, at least as far as what the
European Commission has to say. I don't
1185:
I came to this page after linking to it from the "Privacy" page, and I completely agree with this; I feel very uncomfortable linking to it from "Privacy". One part I found particularly revealing: "As of 2011, there were few protections against the harm caused by incidents such as revenge porn
834:
Thanks for including that information. Regarding removed urls, there is an external link about removed URLs "hiddenfromgoogle.com". We tried at first to send our lists of removed URLs to that site but it's no longer updated. So we published our own lists and they are the basis for the
Fortune
808:
laws. The right to be forgotten was invoked to remove from Google searches 120 reports about company directors published by a Spanish company which compiles such reports about private company directors, consisting entirely of information they are required by law to disclose;
1124:
agent who was ordered to correct his employment history on professional social media site LinkedIn. The court gave Willem van der Schyff five days within which to remove the details of former employer Daniel Crous Auctioneers from his LinkedIn profile, as it was misleading.
844:
an important part involved in the Right to be Forgotten conflict and due to the relevancy of our company shouldn't be named (or have a Knowledge entry)? Please forgive my boldness, I'm new at Knowledge. I've read all the guidelines and considering our
649:
I totally agree with Jimbo on this and I applaud him for taking the initiative to remove the image from the article. I honestly came expecting to see a huge fight/argument. I'm rather glad there isn't one. The image's copyright is also under dispute
815:
magazine examined the 64 reports relating to UK directorships, finding that in 27 (42%) the director was the only person named, in the remaining only the director and co-directors were named, and 23 (36%) involve directorships started since 2012."
599:
simply establishes that search engines are responsible for their links as data providers. The so-called "right to be forgotten" was in fact not established by the ruling and is just one of a number of grounds for requesting take downs.
634:
Yes, I'm sure that's sensible (I mean removing it on BLP grounds), and I saw your remarks about it on your Talk page as well. It's an odd case and I think you're right to say it doesn't have much significance for the debate.
851:
684:
case, with a link to a Knowledge page of that name - but that page is a redirect back to this page. Was there, and should there be, a page for this case, and if not, shouldn't the link be removed?
992:
Hi everyone, I was interested in making mention of how this movement is also gaining traction in Canada due to a recent legal decision in a case here. Some links that discuss it are here:
472:
in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Canterbury/International Human Rights Law (2014 S1)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
1297:
431:
796:
Yes, I think it is relevant. I've added the following in the criticism section: "Such removal can impact the accuracy and ability of businesses and individuals to carry out
441:
194:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1257:
651:
124:
114:
407:
1292:
1272:
231:
221:
1262:
1206:
This section sounds like marketing and I think it should simply be removed. But I'll wait a bit in case it's more important than I realize right now.--
1282:
336:
326:
546:
Pablo Palazzi 17:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC) the mention of the argentinean references in this article are incorrect, it has nothing to do with the RTBF
562:
997:
398:
359:
90:
1287:
1252:
1030:
196:
1267:
702:
1171:
1054:
620:
am removing it on BLP grounds pending further discussion here. Please let's not put it back here without a strong consensus to do so.--
374:
353:
302:
1277:
1001:
490:
81:
58:
509:
I think the name of the man that the recent legal decision was decided for should be in this article. he is his own streisand effect.
510:
186:
147:
536:
293:
254:
1000:(Non-profit organization which deals with professional information management, and extendedly data and privacy, as well.)
783:
595:
Regarding the lead image, there is no evidence that the take down request was properly a "right to be forgotten" request.
469:
1115:
Although an interesting story, as it is not related to "right to be forgotten" and also no verifiable source, I removed:
895:
of paraphrasing, the Knowledge version seems to infringe on AOL's copyright, though the writer may not have been aware.
558:
33:
1045:
Actually, Google is mentioned 70 times in the article body, which seems fine when you consider their involvement and
840:
920:
712:
532:
836:
1034:
998:
http://www.arma.org/r1/news/canadian-policy-brief/2017/02/08/canadian-court-opens-door-to-right-to-be-forgotten
390:
1225:
1058:
1175:
1023:
This document mentions 'Google' 116 times. Now Google is a good example, but this feels a bit over the top.
916:
760:
554:
494:
964:
514:
1097:
1211:
1049:. Are you suggesting that some of the mentions should be removed, or just letting us know how you feel?
797:
625:
39:
859:
737:
572:
279:
269:
248:
1026:
1009:
709:
550:
486:
575:
in the Bibliography and it seemed to me both on-topic and useful, the text remarks depending on it.
21:
1191:
1002:
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/2017/02/did-a-canadian-court-just-establish-a-new-right-to-be-forgotten/
636:
605:
576:
406:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
301:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1233:
1152:
811:
805:
1004:(Michael Geist is a legal expert, with specific expertise in the area of technology and law.)
1092:
1082:
821:
659:
640:
609:
580:
403:
178:
1207:
621:
1228:
probably needs to be worked into the article somehow, though I'm not the person to do it. â
1005:
689:
285:
483:
Whole section sounds like a really contrived advertisement for this Oblivion software.
1187:
1086:
965:"Google's Schmidt Stands Firm On Not Applying Europe's Search De-Listing To Google.Com"
680:
942:
1246:
1229:
1085:, otherwise comments like the one above are likely to be ignored as non-constructive
1074:
848:
maybe we should have an entry, given that an editor agrees, of course. Best regards.
801:
817:
655:
86:
993:
876:
I've never tried to contribute, and I feel out of my depth here. Please advise.
1238:
1215:
1195:
1179:
1104:
1062:
1038:
1013:
924:
863:
855:
825:
741:
733:
693:
663:
644:
629:
613:
584:
540:
518:
498:
761:"Company directors are deep-sixing Google links citing 'right to be forgotten'"
685:
525:
380:
275:
191:
168:
73:
52:
462:
604:
edits. However (hopefully), it cannot be harmful to point out the facts.
298:
1151:. Tallinn University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Governance,
845:
190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
908:
check the rest of the article for plagiarism, unreliable sources, etc.
162:
141:
887:
compelled to escalate de-indexing to .com by the ECJ in the future.
573:
http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/eilr/27/27.1/Carter.pdf
1141:
879:
First, I noticed various cosmetic flaws in the following text:
872:
plagiarism, unreliable sources, possible copyright infringement
457:
15:
902:
rewrite the quoted text to have sufficiently original wording
912:
For now, I just deleted the text to avoid copyright issues.
678:
In the section on the U. S. A. there's reference to the
297:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
402:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
707:and could one day become an article. All the best:
725:Right to be forgotten and non-personal information
804:to comply with antibribery, anticorruption, and
699:Not necessarily. The redirect is what we call a
994:http://canliiconnects.org/en/commentaries/44785
8:
852:requested the creation of Dato Capital entry
1142:"The Right to be Forgotten in Social Media"
1298:High-importance Freedom of speech articles
1024:
484:
348:
243:
136:
47:
996:(Legal website which discusses case law)
571:Seems OK to me. I checked this reference
1069:In future please append comments to the
1132:
934:
784:"Some Things Should Not Be 'Forgotten'"
751:
416:Knowledge:WikiProject Freedom of speech
350:
245:
138:
49:
19:
835:article. Maybe they are relevant too:
419:Template:WikiProject Freedom of speech
200:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
7:
1258:Mid-importance Human rights articles
898:I imagine the steps to take are to:
396:This article is within the scope of
291:This article is within the scope of
184:This article is within the scope of
79:This article is within the scope of
1081:). You might also wish to consider
468:This article was the subject of an
38:It is of interest to the following
1293:B-Class Freedom of speech articles
1273:Mid-importance Philosophy articles
915:Thank you, anyone, for helping! --
99:Knowledge:WikiProject Human rights
14:
1263:WikiProject Human rights articles
102:Template:WikiProject Human rights
1283:Mid-importance Internet articles
524:
461:
383:
373:
352:
278:
268:
247:
206:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
171:
161:
140:
72:
51:
20:
1053:and am tempted to remove it...
837:Removed links from UK directors
436:This article has been rated as
331:This article has been rated as
226:This article has been rated as
209:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
119:This article has been rated as
1014:23:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
694:08:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
311:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet
1:
1288:WikiProject Internet articles
1253:B-Class Human rights articles
1239:07:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
1216:18:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
1140:Ezeani, Uchenna Paul (2017).
1063:20:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
864:10:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
826:00:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
759:Parloff, Roger (2014-10-21).
742:23:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
718:20:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC).
410:and see a list of open tasks.
399:WikiProject Freedom of speech
314:Template:WikiProject Internet
305:and see a list of open tasks.
93:and see a list of open tasks.
1165:Article seems to be rubbish.
1111:Linkedin Case - South Africa
1105:14:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
1039:12:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
841:Removed directors from Spain
1268:B-Class Philosophy articles
905:cite the TechCrunch article
703:Redirect with possibilities
664:02:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
1314:
925:09:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
645:18:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
630:10:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
614:01:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
499:18:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
442:project's importance scale
422:Freedom of speech articles
337:project's importance scale
232:project's importance scale
125:project's importance scale
1278:B-Class Internet articles
1196:05:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
585:18:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
435:
368:
330:
263:
225:
156:
118:
67:
46:
541:00:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
519:15:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
391:Freedom of speech portal
82:WikiProject Human rights
1221:News story from Germany
1180:16:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
943:"Right to be forgotten"
786:. Wall Street Journal.
470:educational assignment
187:WikiProject Philosophy
28:This article is rated
988:Contribution interest
798:business intelligence
105:Human rights articles
1019:Google Google Google
533:WalledGardenDefender
294:WikiProject Internet
1202:Section on Oblivion
1083:creating an account
1077:using four tildes (
505:Google vs. Gonzalez
212:Philosophy articles
1153:Tallinn Law School
1075:sign your comments
1073:of talk pages and
806:know your customer
763:. Fortune Magazine
555:Pabloandrespalazzi
197:general discussion
34:content assessment
1041:
1029:comment added by
917:Josiahmcclellan07
719:
567:
553:comment added by
501:
489:comment added by
476:
475:
456:
455:
452:
451:
448:
447:
413:Freedom of speech
404:Freedom of speech
360:Freedom of speech
347:
346:
343:
342:
317:Internet articles
242:
241:
238:
237:
179:Philosophy portal
135:
134:
131:
130:
1305:
1157:
1156:
1146:
1137:
1102:
1100:
1095:
1080:
1047:read the article
980:
979:
977:
975:
963:Lomas, Natasha.
960:
954:
953:
951:
949:
939:
788:
787:
779:
773:
772:
770:
768:
756:
717:
706:
566:
547:
528:
465:
458:
424:
423:
420:
417:
414:
393:
388:
387:
386:
377:
370:
369:
364:
356:
349:
319:
318:
315:
312:
309:
288:
283:
282:
272:
265:
264:
259:
251:
244:
214:
213:
210:
207:
204:
181:
176:
175:
174:
165:
158:
157:
152:
144:
137:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1243:
1242:
1223:
1204:
1167:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1149:Bachelor Thesis
1144:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1121:
1113:
1098:
1093:
1091:
1078:
1031:217.149.135.124
1021:
990:
985:
984:
983:
973:
971:
962:
961:
957:
947:
945:
941:
940:
936:
874:
800:, particularly
793:
792:
791:
782:Wright, Jason.
781:
780:
776:
766:
764:
758:
757:
753:
727:
700:
676:
652:on its own page
593:
548:
507:
481:
438:High-importance
421:
418:
415:
412:
411:
389:
384:
382:
363:Highâimportance
362:
316:
313:
310:
307:
306:
286:Internet portal
284:
277:
257:
211:
208:
205:
202:
201:
177:
172:
170:
150:
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1311:
1309:
1301:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1245:
1244:
1222:
1219:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1120:
1117:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1020:
1017:
989:
986:
982:
981:
955:
933:
932:
928:
910:
909:
906:
903:
892:
891:
890:
889:
873:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
846:media presence
829:
828:
790:
789:
774:
750:
749:
745:
726:
723:
722:
721:
720:
681:Melvin v. Reid
675:
673:Melvin v. Reid
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
647:
592:
589:
588:
587:
544:
543:
506:
503:
480:
477:
474:
473:
466:
454:
453:
450:
449:
446:
445:
434:
428:
427:
425:
408:the discussion
395:
394:
378:
366:
365:
357:
345:
344:
341:
340:
333:Mid-importance
329:
323:
322:
320:
303:the discussion
290:
289:
273:
261:
260:
258:Midâimportance
252:
240:
239:
236:
235:
228:Mid-importance
224:
218:
217:
215:
183:
182:
166:
154:
153:
151:Midâimportance
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:Mid-importance
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
62:Midâimportance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1310:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1248:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1231:
1227:
1220:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1172:98.21.221.175
1164:
1154:
1150:
1143:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1118:
1116:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1096:
1088:
1084:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1055:197.89.183.63
1051:
1050:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1018:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
987:
970:
966:
959:
956:
944:
938:
935:
931:
927:
926:
922:
918:
913:
907:
904:
901:
900:
899:
896:
888:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
877:
871:
865:
861:
857:
854:
853:
847:
842:
838:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
823:
819:
814:
813:
807:
803:
802:due diligence
799:
795:
794:
785:
778:
775:
762:
755:
752:
748:
744:
743:
739:
735:
731:
724:
715:
714:
711:
704:
698:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
683:
682:
674:
671:
665:
661:
657:
653:
648:
646:
642:
638:
633:
632:
631:
627:
623:
618:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
601:
598:
591:Tom Carstairs
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
542:
538:
534:
531:
527:
523:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
504:
502:
500:
496:
492:
488:
478:
471:
467:
464:
460:
459:
443:
439:
433:
430:
429:
426:
409:
405:
401:
400:
392:
381:
379:
376:
372:
371:
367:
361:
358:
355:
351:
338:
334:
328:
325:
324:
321:
304:
300:
296:
295:
287:
281:
276:
274:
271:
267:
266:
262:
256:
253:
250:
246:
233:
229:
223:
220:
219:
216:
199:
198:
193:
189:
188:
180:
169:
167:
164:
160:
159:
155:
149:
146:
143:
139:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1234:
1224:
1205:
1168:
1148:
1135:
1127:
1122:
1119:South Africa
1114:
1090:
1070:
1046:
1025:â Preceding
1022:
991:
972:. Retrieved
968:
958:
946:. Retrieved
937:
929:
914:
911:
897:
893:
885:
878:
875:
849:
810:
777:
765:. Retrieved
754:
746:
732:
728:
708:
679:
677:
672:
602:
596:
594:
549:â Preceding
545:
529:
508:
491:5.144.157.51
485:â Preceding
482:
437:
397:
332:
292:
227:
195:
185:
120:
96:Human rights
87:Human rights
80:
59:Human rights
40:WikiProjects
1208:Jimbo Wales
1089:. Regards,
850:Note: I've
767:15 February
622:Jimbo Wales
511:108.94.3.58
1247:Categories
1226:This story
1128:References
1087:soapboxing
1006:100937852S
969:TechCrunch
948:22 October
930:References
747:References
713:Farmbrough
203:Philosophy
192:philosophy
148:Philosophy
1188:Lcdrovers
1230:MahÄgaja
1027:unsigned
974:9 August
563:contribs
551:unsigned
530:Declined
487:unsigned
479:Research
308:Internet
299:Internet
255:Internet
1155:. 8407.
818:AHeneen
812:Fortune
656:JMP EAX
637:RR 2014
606:RR 2014
597:Costeja
577:RR 2014
440:on the
335:on the
230:on the
123:on the
30:B-class
1099:design
1094:nagual
1071:bottom
856:EA 999
734:EA 999
36:scale.
1145:(pdf)
686:Wocky
1235:talk
1212:talk
1192:talk
1176:talk
1079:~~~~
1059:talk
1035:talk
1010:talk
976:2015
950:2014
921:talk
860:talk
839:and
822:talk
769:2015
738:talk
710:Rich
690:talk
660:talk
641:talk
626:talk
610:talk
581:talk
559:talk
537:talk
515:talk
495:talk
432:High
654:.)
327:Mid
222:Mid
115:Mid
1249::
1232:¡
1214:)
1194:)
1178:)
1147:.
1061:)
1037:)
1012:)
967:.
923:)
862:)
824:)
740:)
716:,
705:}}
701:{{
692:)
662:)
643:)
628:)
612:)
583:)
565:)
561:â˘
539:)
517:)
497:)
1210:(
1190:(
1174:(
1057:(
1033:(
1008:(
978:.
952:.
919:(
858:(
820:(
771:.
736:(
688:(
658:(
650:(
639:(
624:(
608:(
579:(
557:(
535:(
513:(
493:(
444:.
339:.
234:.
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
