Knowledge

Talk:Runaways (TV series)/Archive 1

Source 📝

2224:
listing Old Lace would not be correct). "Main" felt like the best subsection of "Cast and characters" to place the info since Old Lace is considered a Runaway member in the comics. However, adding it under "Recurring" or "Guest" would also be acceptable in my opinion, simply as long as the content is listed under the level 2 "Cast and characters" heading. I don't feel it is quite accurate to include it in the "Production" section. Casting doesn't work in my eyes, because the issue of no actor attached becomes more apparent here, when all the other info in this section is about actors joining the project, and I don't feel any of the other subsections there currently would work, nor the need to create a single one just for this info. -
658:"? Saying that, at least that way, is basically to say that the film is in the MCU. If we follow the cautious approach of not treating this as a MCU property unless confirmed, we should also avoid the idea of both installments having the same character. They may be two different and unrelated live-action characters that are simply based on the same comic book character, for the same reason that Spider-Man is not the same live-action character in the Maguire, Garfield and Webb portrayals. Recast and reboot are not the same thing. 2285:, the version I linked was how the info initially was added to the article before its premiere. Then you edited the article to move the info elsewhere, which I took as "Bold". I believe I then reverted it, for you to undo my edit, (so "Revert") and we did that once more before I started this discussion. So the version I put the article to, is the STATUSQUO as it is the version before the disputed change (the moving of the info out of the "Cast and characters" section). - 31: 1963:- if you open up the page history to a lot more than the past fifty contributions, you'll see that there are a far lot more edits concerning it. (However, we all know that content disputes are never solved by how many people there are on each side; that is, after all, a vote.) That means that the bold edit is adding the headers, and once these have been reverted, the discussion needs to unfold here on the talk page. -- 694:
list anything remotely superheroic at all. So who's to say that it will be a super hero show? It may also fall in the realm of posibility that the adaption uses the character's personalities and the general premise of escaping from home, but avoiding superpowers completely. No dinosaurs, no aliens, no magic staffs, no robots, no time-travel, no evil gods from another dimension, etc.
1208:
lines, we still want it to be someone. Often times, that's how the names come about. The names that we pull usually are the ones that are relatively top of mind or have been amongst characters that we've thought about, like the Runaways for a long time. I would call that an Easter egg that most people won't even see".
1227:
Also, as can be seen via the article, the actress playing Tina in the TV series is not the same as the one who played her in the film, and their character descriptions are vastly different. Was this simply a recasting? We don't know at this time, so we can't use that as a confirmation. Plus, all that
2153:
Cool, we appear to have a marked difference of opinion, equally supported and opposed. Let's initiate an RfC, and get some more opinions on the subject. I haven't heard anything yet that alters my opinion that articles have the freedom to present themselves how they wish, and I believe that the cast
1041:
can be listed within the MCU, for various reasons. One thing that Marvel Studios has done with it's official Marvel Cinematic Universe television series is include the "Marvel's" intro word. The pilot episode has now been filmed and wrapped production and those involved in the series are posting on
940:
I have noticed that the Runaways comic book may be relaunched, by Rainbow Rowell and Kris Anka. This is not directly related to the TV series, but focused on the original comic book continuity (meaning, this is not "the comic adaption of the TV series", but an actual comic with new stories). Still,
920:
I feel like this is becoming WAY to particular when really a whole lot about the show isn't yet known. It's like at the slightest indication that something's different, we jump to say one thing or another. The graphic used at the presentation was obviously not a logo for one. Secondly if you reread
2003:
The consensu of the Television WikiProject and Television Manual of Style is that only three sections are necessary in any cast section - Main (as credited in the opening credits or per reliable sources), Recurring (appearances in three or more episodes) and Guest (normally only notable guests, in
2223:
on November 18, 2017, has the info in the cast section, under main. My reasoning and support of this location, is yes, there is no actor attached or credited as Old Lace, but she is still a character, and the section is called "Cast and characters", not just "Cast" (if it was just that, then yes,
2057:
to split the cast into sections that are based on in-universe events. In the credits of the series, which is determined by the series producers, there is no differentiating between the ages of the characters, and thus, there should be no such differentiation here. If you wish to gain consensus to
1939:
of the Television WikiProject and Television Manual of Style is that only three sections are necessary in any cast section - Main (as credited in the opening credits or per reliable sources), Recurring (appearances in three or more episodes) and Guest (normally only notable guests, in two or less
1908:
So, what is the edit-warring all about now? The cast can almost perfectly be broken into three groups: kids (protagonists), parents (antagonists) and recurring. As the series is new, I am not expecting a lot in the recurring section, but the parent/kid split is noted in several sources. Since our
1207:
Just in case someone else has problems with the links, Siege said this: "Drumm, you do hear the name in the movie. That's how we always build the universe. There are so many characters in the books, that if we have the need for a person to be in this place at this time and have a line, or have no
693:
The "Genre" field in the infobox currently lists Action / Adventure, Science fiction, Superhero and Teen drama. But which is the source for that? The character description released by Marvel, for both the runaways and their parents, not only do not mention anything related to the MCU, they do not
224:
had been ordered straight-to-series."? But what seems odd too, is the supposed filming start info added below, only states it is for the pilot, whereas C&D's states it is for the series. I've already added this Futon source to the C&D draft for the executive producer info for that series,
2280:
But as formatted (without a bullet), that is not indicating that anyone is "playing" Old Lace in my opinion, and I think others will not think that as well or get that interpretation. And as I stated, if it is a matter of credits, I'd be fine moving the info out of the "Main" section, and to the
963:
Marvel generally tends to publish comics related to their upcoming TV projects or films before or around their release. I wouldn't call it a "coincidence", but I also wouldn't call it anything that should be mentioned here, since it is not a tie-in to this series, just a relaunch of the title in
268:
It seems reeally odd that they would order a pilot plus scripts and then pick it up for series before the pilot is made. Perhaps someone at Freeform writing the release mistakenly translated the full season order of scripts to a straight to season order. I agree that waiting is the most prudent
2109:
I disagree, for the very reasons as presented above. You have no essay, guideline or policy support, or WikiProject or Manual of Style to support, to split the credits into sections that are not displayed as such in the credits. Shall we have the same discussion twice in the same section? --
1211:
Which, as pointed by DinoSlider, does not say anything about the TV series. He is talking about the minor character in the Dr. Strange film, that Tina Minoru is a character from the Runaways comic, and why did they name that character as "Tina Minoru" and not "average joe with magic powers".
1839:
I am noticing that a lot of the character section seems to be a direct lift from the press materials for the series. I urge a rewrite to remove the similarities, before someone (read: me) starts excising parts of the section for being copyright violations. I'll wait a week. -
1344:
has been confirmed to be in the MCU, perhaps it is logical (and perhaps expected by the studio(?)) to assume that if it says "Marvel's" in a title announcement for a live action series - it means it is a part of the MCU? Sounds like it's the case thus far. Apologize to those
2244:. No one is being credited for "playing" Old Lace—this is not a motion-capture performance like Andy Serkis in Lord of the Rings or Planet of the Apes. These sections, sometimes called "Cast" or sometimes called "Cast and characters", all share the same type of information: 884:
True (but that's only a matter of time). It was linked to from the official Marvel Facebook page, which is how I first noticed it. The logo is also featured in images specifically uploaded by the official Marvel page. (likewise for Twitter and Instagram equivalents)
1278:
There's actually some good info in here that might be useful on the main MCU article about how even though the films do not reference the series, placing the series into the universe is still useful to the showrunners since they do not have to try to introduce new
1449:
Both the ComicBook.com and DenOfGeek.com sources are simply observing what is on the poster. Neither source provides any knowledge of what is actually in the series. While we can all agree that it is likely, these sources are only speculating just like us. -
2262:
The key point being: "real person". A visual/animatronic effect like Old Lace should be in the "Production" section. I don't have a preference on where... I'm guessing "Filming" would make the most sense, but Old Lace is not a cast member. Old Lace is
653:
There has been some discussion about the Runaways being in the MCU or not, and the current idea is to refrain any such claim until Marvel confirms it. But what about the part "The character previously appeared in the Marvel Cinematic Universe film
1686:
I've seen the site here and there. It is definitely fringe in terms of using as a source, and I'm not sure if it would be consider reliable. I would be okay holding off, or adding these hidden on the article until a better source came around. -
2023:
Additionally, you make the feeble argument that consensus decided against noting the adversarial nature of the cast of characters; I guess I just don;t see that. So prove to me that you have a valid consensus. That's all I am asking. -
1670:
of the first four episodes. According to them, the titles for episodes three and four are Destiny and Fifteen, respectively. It is a review, so they must have seen them, but I have never seen this site used as a reference. Thoughts? -
176:
I can't seem to access the primary source, but it's not that I don't believe it's there. It's more that it seems like something that would be touted by Hulu or Marvel with an announcement. Or at least the trade sites reporting such. -
2019:
note main/recurring/guest. It isn't INUNIVERSE to note the basic breakdown of characters. Plus, you note a "guest star" who isn't credited as such. I'm not opposed to Main/Recurring/Guest but ignoring the elephant in the room is
1335:
That or it's simply verifies that sources I have used are indeed reliable and dependable. That's all that was intended here. Not so much an 'in your face' but more of a 'yeah, I knew those were good sources'. Given the fact that
1363:. As I replied on the List of MCU TV series talk, we still can not assume "Marvel's" in the title automatically makes it an MCU series, without the individual verification for that series. Coincidence is not verification. - 239:
Since there seems to be a bit of confusion, we could just hold off for now. This is a Freeform press release as well, not ABC Signature Studios, Marvel, or Hulu, so there is a chance that someone at Freeform got it wrong. -
2049:
I'm not seeing anything about a Kids or Parents section? I also recommend that you read the archives of both the Television WikiProject and Television Manual of Style talk pages, not just the latter; you might find it most
122: 769:) is far different than any we've seen yet for a TV series (note there is no indication it is a final one or not). Seeing this though, definitely puts up flags for me that the series may in fact not be in the MCU. - 1298:
Man, it's great that that article is finally enough for all of you to agree that it is a part of the franchise. Was obvious from the beginning. Now we can all look and see that my observations were indeed correct.
1149:
Dang it won't let me embed the link here for some weird reason... search "runaways easter egg in doctor strange" on Google, and it's the first article to come up, and is directly from Comicbook.com in an exclusive
921:
that interview with Feige I don't see how it can be misconstrued to be misunderstood as him talking about he comicbooks as opposed to the TV series. Can't wait for the studio to shut down all this nitpicking. --
2239:
And to me, it is clear the cast section is meant for actors, as in humans, who appear in the credits, hence the reason there is so much guidance on listing entries there based on the series' credits as per
1743:
Does that mean the last episode is scheduled for a January 9 release? If so, i request the intro be edited, because the part i quoted above reads to me like the series will not be on Hulu after January 9.
205:
It does seem a bit odd, but we knew that they were likely to pick up a full season, so maybe someone just didn't realise that it hadn't been announced yet? The timing for pre-production does sound right. -
1791:
premiered in Los Angeles on November 16, 2017, and on Hulu on November 21, 2017. The tenth episode, currently intended as the last episode of season 1, is presently scheduled to be on Hulu on January 9,
1538:
has listed the characters' powers multiple times, only for other editors to revert them stating that the trailers aren't evidence enough. Well now we have the actors discussing their characters powers
2266:
Also, would have been nice if, while we were discussing, you had left the status quo as it currently stood, as opposed to reaching into the past to find an edit that supported your interpretation. —
1068:
thing is a good indication to us, as fans, that the series will likely be set in the MCU, but it is not actual confirmation that we can use here. And MCUExchange is just assuming, like many fans. -
565:
Cool. Adding now. And given there is a new actress for Tina Minoru and completely different character description (which was kind of a given), it does throw a little doubt on if it is in the MCU. -
1883: 1314:
Your "I told you so" attitude towards the editors here is an extreme turn-off towards editing collaboratively with you. It won't be appreciated or tolerated by anyone here, so please act in a more
1952:
is a consensus - different editors adding it to the article without starting any form of discussion, that's their personal belief on what should be in the article, that's not a consensus, as you
1099:
wielding the Staff of One -- whether it was a deleted scene or not (I'm not sure because it's been a while since I've seen the movie) -- was intentionally shot so as to 'set up' or connect to
2299:
I agree with Favre that the Old Lace information should be placed in the "Cast and characters" section and not in any of the "Production" subsections as it doesn't fit in any of those per
1924:
Well, given that it was you that started the edit-warring, I am the one that is most interested in your answer to your own question. Especially when it's so interesting that you preach for
1169:
For everyone else article is titled, "First Major Runaways Easter Eggs in Doctor Strange" and is a Comicbook.com exclusive article. Not sure why it's not letting me link the page here...--
191:
You have to click on the link under the picture and then it pops up. I agree with you, so that's why I went looking for the original version to make sure it wasn't a typo or something. -
1189: 2080:
For Your Information. My edits was so a person a more easy to read the Cast section list and the Parents group is named the Pride or calling them that in the Article would work too.
1464:
We'll hopefully get clarification at the NYCC panel in 2 days, at which point even if we kept the source we had now, it would be mute because a better one will become available. -
731:
After looking at the sources carefully, I suppose you are correct but Chase's description does seem to hint at his technopathic skills. I guess we'll have to wait and see.--
1812:
You're reading it correctly, yes - the final episode of this season is set to be released on January 9, after which the whole season will remain on Hulu indefinitely. --
1232:
makes absolutely no mention of the TV series. (And regardless, all this info about this appearance is in the "Cast" section stating as much as we can at the moment.) -
2095:
That would work for me, esp. since the Pride is wikilinked. Add that to the adversarial nature of the charcters as cited by sources, and that might work just fine. -
1786:
correct or not. IF the 10th episode is first available on Hulu on January 9, 2018, but ANY episodes are still available on Hulu after that, maybe something like...
2127:
Alex is correct. If a cast list needs to be split, we do say based on crediting and not any other subjective measure—particularly not in-universe categorisation. -
1417:
from Den of Geek is more definitive (and includes the poster in the source for visual reference). I'd be happy to replace the Comicbook.com source with this one. -
1192:: At no point in that source does Feige say anything about the TV series. The author of the article mentions it, but does not explicitly connect it to the film. - 1087:
Easter eggs. Now I know that we usually don't use Comicbook.com as a source, as it is secondary -- but in few cases they have an exclusive article. In the article
254:
True, though most of the content is the same as what Deadline and Marvel.com had, outside of the bits that discussed each company. But yeah, no problem waiting. -
475:
Fair enough, I'll take your word for it. I read it as soon as I got an email that the story had been published, but I didn't pay much attention to that detail. -
461:
I read it before they've changed the title and it was nothing about pilot. I'm just saying that it's something strange that Marvel don't use word pilot at all.
447:
I saw that original Deadline title as well, but I believe the article always said pilot. The author of the article doesn't always determine the title. -
1581:
Who changed the logo?! The one that was there before was much better looking aesthetically than the dark-colored bizarre version that is there now.--
1103:, as similar strategies are used to set up connections to related properties in the MCU. Does this not confirm that the show is a part of the MCU?-- 1610:
The new one is the actual title card for the series, which is what will be used eventually. Might as well just do it now, as I saw the episode. -
1948:). That also includes no Guest Starring, Special Guest, etc. sections. Yes, that also includes not having any specific Kids and Parents section. 941:
it is clearly done at the same time. Should we mention this, in a "marketing" section or similar, or ignore it as if it was a mere coincidence?
673:
Maguire, Garfield, and Holland all play Spider-Man though, and the respective articles for the latter two mention prior portrayals as well. -
1596:
It doesn't really matter what is better looking aesthetically, apparently this is the version of the logo that was in the actual episode. -
418: 301:
I think that reports about pilot order are false. When it comes to press releases, earier Marvel never skiped information about pilot order
2154:
separation is helpful and germane to the article, and not in-universe. As others disagree, lets get more eyes on the discussion, please. -
1799: 1751: 922: 1932:, especially when the first paragraph in its lead states "These "other stuff exists" arguments can be valid or invalid" - much like now. 1547: 1133: 1088: 1360: 1185: 716:"Teen drama" is fine, that one can clearly be understood from the press releases, but I would remove the others for the time being. 525:
Oh yeah. Missed that on the first time around. That's a big flag there that this might not be the best place to gather this info. -
2015:
You might want to give that MOS another look; it doesn't say what you think it does. But please, feel entirely free to note how we
1398:
The cited source only says that the poster "seemingly confirms the Deinonychus for the series". That sounds a little iffy to me. -
1667: 1014: 1483: 702: 547: 2058:
update the cast guideline and support the addition of extra sections, then that's up to you to start a discussion elsewhere. --
1886:
only returns one source with a moderate level of possible copyright violations and that source isn’t used in the cast section.—-
1516:
Furthermore - the trailer officially released gives the viewers a glimpse of Old Lace, and each of the Runaways abilities too.--
1414: 1002: 306: 1929: 433:
don't use pilot. It's wierd, that Marvel in their press releases don't say anything about pilot, what they usually did.
784:
That's not a logo. They used standard text in the same font and style for all their shows during the presentation (See
2038:
Amusing how you accuse others of personal attacks, then do the same. Clearly you're such the companion here, bucko.
1359:
The sources were probably reliable all along, that doesn't mean what they were say was correct or able to be used.
38: 623:
article nor the LoC. I also believe we did not do the same with Meredith Quill's actress, who had a small role in
400: 121:"Marvel Studios and ABC Signature are also in pre-production on straight-to-series “Marvel’s Runaways” for Hulu." 1632: 1586: 1566: 1521: 1440: 1350: 1304: 1174: 1155: 1140: 1108: 1054: 987:
reports "A @Hulu Original series based on the @Marvel cult classic comic series. Coming November 21. #Runaways"
220:
Yes pre-production sounds right. Do you think we should add it here something like, "By the end of January 2017,
47: 17: 2303:. Since the character has not appeared in series regular manner, I would put it at the bottom of "Recurring". - 2159: 2119: 2100: 2067: 2029: 1972: 1914: 1891: 1867: 1845: 1821: 1774: 1327: 1284: 1269: 926: 890: 861: 846: 797: 751: 736: 555: 516: 376: 336: 1803: 1755: 422: 945: 1928:
and against edit-warring, then go against both of those yourself. It is also interesting how you state that
1551: 593:
Maybe, but it wasn't that big of a role. As a comparison, I don't think we mention that Enver Gjokaj was in
1482:, "Loeb then rolled a teaser from the second episode of the series, which features a cameo from Old Lace." 2300: 2085: 1217: 1123: 1049:. It's also worth nothing that the series is a regular topic on the MCU Exchange at www.mcuexchange.com -- 953: 721: 663: 886: 857: 842: 793: 551: 512: 430: 372: 332: 313:
Marvel never used word "pilot" (I know it's OR) in any press release. Second thing is, what is writen on
159: 2290: 2271: 2229: 2192: 2132: 1945: 1692: 1651: 1615: 1601: 1469: 1422: 1368: 1237: 1073: 1022: 969: 948:, but have a care, there is a huge spoiler on the content of the first story arc. You have been warned. 832: 811: 774: 678: 632: 606: 570: 530: 408: 302: 259: 245: 230: 211: 182: 149: 106: 2081: 1561:
Thanks for finding these other sources. I have now added this information with citations to the page.--
426: 2054: 1941: 1726: 1708: 1676: 1628: 1582: 1562: 1535: 1517: 1496: 1455: 1436: 1403: 1389: 1346: 1300: 1255: 1247: 1197: 1170: 1151: 1136: 1134:
http://comicbook.com/marvel/2016/10/14/first-look-at-major-runaways-easter-eggs-in-doctor-strange/.--
1104: 1050: 990: 904: 875: 584: 480: 466: 462: 452: 438: 434: 390: 386: 358: 354: 322: 318: 274: 196: 167: 130: 126: 698: 2282: 2216: 2155: 2112: 2096: 2060: 2025: 1965: 1936: 1910: 1887: 1877: 1860: 1841: 1814: 1767: 1320: 1280: 1265: 998: 766: 747: 732: 1782:
That depends if i'm reading what it says now correctly or not--and it depends if what it says now
2215:
There has been some disagreement about where to place Old Lace's description in the article. The
706: 87: 1984:
Okay, since you decided to champion this (goody), let's look at your asserions, bypassing the
1643: 1543: 1539: 1213: 1119: 949: 824: 717: 659: 548:
https://news.marvel.com/tv/59437/marvels-runaways-sets-remaining-cast-television-project-hulu/
417:
An hour ago it was "‘Marvel’s Runaways’ Hulu Drama Series Sets Cast", they had to change, but
2047:
It may be appropriate to split the cast listing by "Main" and "Recurring" cast or characters.
785: 349: 2312: 2308: 2294: 2286: 2275: 2267: 2233: 2225: 2196: 2188: 2163: 2136: 2128: 2122: 2104: 2089: 2070: 2042: 2033: 1975: 1918: 1895: 1870: 1849: 1824: 1807: 1777: 1759: 1696: 1688: 1680: 1655: 1647: 1636: 1619: 1611: 1605: 1597: 1590: 1570: 1555: 1525: 1500: 1486: 1473: 1465: 1459: 1444: 1432: 1426: 1418: 1407: 1393: 1372: 1364: 1354: 1330: 1308: 1288: 1273: 1259: 1241: 1233: 1221: 1201: 1178: 1159: 1144: 1127: 1112: 1077: 1069: 1058: 1026: 1018: 1006: 973: 965: 957: 930: 908: 894: 879: 865: 850: 836: 828: 815: 807: 801: 778: 770: 755: 740: 725: 682: 674: 667: 636: 628: 610: 602: 588: 574: 566: 559: 534: 526: 520: 484: 470: 456: 442: 412: 404: 394: 380: 362: 340: 326: 278: 263: 255: 249: 241: 234: 226: 215: 207: 200: 186: 178: 171: 153: 145: 141: 134: 110: 102: 95: 1672: 1492: 1451: 1399: 1315: 1251: 1193: 900: 871: 580: 476: 448: 270: 192: 163: 91: 140:
Hmm. That seems a little strange to bury that reveal in the very end of a press release.
710: 1855: 1096: 994: 1985: 1925: 1091:
it can be read that in the site's interview with Producer and head of Marvel Studios
317:: "Don't miss Marvel's Runaways, an ALL NEW original series, coming soon to @Hulu!". 1909:
viewpoints have no weight versus that of reliable sources, we include it as such. -
1718:
the 10-episode series streaming on Hulu from November 21, 2017 until January 9, 2018
1627:
Since when has Knowledge used on-screen title cards for pages? This is news to me.--
789: 75: 2304: 1092: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2241: 331:
It's missing the blue checkmark to verify it's an official Twitter feed. -
579:
Is it notable that James Yaegashi appeared in an episode of Daredevil? -
1435:
stated, the character is very plainly on the poster for the TV series.--
1228:
Dino and Cambalachero pointed out: Feige talking about the character in
1993:
other stuff exists arguments can be valid or invalid" - much like now.
314: 1940:
episodes). That is, real-life groups, not in-universe groupings per
1479: 511:. So we know there's already at least one error in that statement. - 2008:
that also includes not having any specific Kids and Parents section
827:. But who knows how trustworthy Marvel Support can be with this. - 1959:
It is far more than two editors want it, one doesn't, as you also
856:
Which I see Favre1fan93 beat me to uploading and adding. Thanks! -
101:
Good to know, but I don't believe that site is a reliable one. -
984: 25: 2185:
articles have the freedom to present themselves how they wish
870:
It should be noted that the Facebook page is not verified. -
765:
The logo used during Hulu's upfront presentation today (seen
709:. As you can see, nothing superheroic anywhere. Compare with 841:
An official logo has been released on the Facebook page. -
2041:
Let's go on a journey, an unexpected adventure, and read
1184:
You have some extra characters at the end of your links.
1190:
Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series
1037:
I know there has been a big debate about whether or not
2220: 1960: 1953: 1083:
I just discovered something when I was reading about
1188:
is the article in question. However, as I stated at
1042:
their social media platforms the news while calling
1736:
scheduled to conclude its season on January 9, 2018
899:And just like that, the page is now verified. - 746:Update, the teaser trailer shows super powers.-- 713:, a description of the comic book characters. 503:It should also be noted the same sentence says 1095:, Feige stated that the brief scene featuring 1132:Try this one, copy and paste it to your url. 8: 507:is producing the series, when it should be 86:) has a shoot date on February 13, 2017. -- 988: 1998:So, feel free to argue how it is invalid. 1765:What do you suggest it be changed to? -- 806:Ah. Thanks for the clarification Anon! - 2281:bottom of "Recurring". Also, as to the 1935:Now onto content, not contributor. The 315:Marvel's Runaways official Twitter page 2046: 1642:It is the standard practice. See also 615:We do not mention Gjokaj appearing in 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1033:Marvel Cinematic Universe installment 7: 1856:Be bold, go for it, do it yourself. 225:should we need this source, FYI. - 385:You're right, I haven't read all. 24: 697:You can read the press releases: 1013:Thanks. Third party sources (ie 29: 980:Premiere date November 21, 2017 403:is still calling it a pilot. - 70:February 13, 2017 Filming Date 1: 2313:07:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2295:06:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2276:18:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 2234:07:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 2211:Old Lace placement in article 2164:16:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 2137:09:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 2123:03:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 2105:02:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 2090:00:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 2071:03:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 2034:16:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 1976:03:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 1944:(and also, for your wording, 1919:02:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 1896:15:23, 24 November 2017 (UTC) 1871:14:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC) 1850:14:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC) 1825:03:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1808:03:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1778:02:49, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1760:02:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1697:00:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC) 1681:00:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 1118:The link is broken for me. -- 1017:) are reporting. Will add. - 637:01:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC) 611:01:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC) 589:00:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC) 575:00:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC) 2197:02:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 1656:00:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1637:23:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1571:23:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1556:20:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 985:https://twitter.com/runaways 560:23:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 535:00:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC) 521:00:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC) 485:00:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC) 471:00:20, 3 February 2017 (UTC) 457:00:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC) 443:00:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC) 413:23:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 395:23:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 381:23:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 363:22:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 341:23:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 327:22:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 279:12:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 264:06:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 250:06:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 235:06:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 216:05:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 201:05:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 187:05:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 172:04:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 154:04:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 135:22:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 111:04:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 96:04:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 1620:00:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC) 1606:19:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 1591:17:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 1526:17:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 1501:13:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 1487:07:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 1474:20:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1460:13:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1445:05:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1427:03:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1413:Old Lace is on the poster. 1408:00:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 1361:WP:Verifiability, not truth 117:Runaways straight-to-series 2333: 1546:. It's indisputable now.-- 741:14:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC) 683:04:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 668:13:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 158:FYI, it is present in the 144:what are your thoughts? - 1373:02:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 1355:01:35, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 1331:02:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 1309:02:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 1289:00:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 1274:23:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC) 1260:23:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC) 1078:09:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC) 1059:04:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC) 1027:17:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 1007:16:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 974:23:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 958:17:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 944:You can see some details 726:14:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC) 18:Talk:Runaways (TV series) 1884:Earwigs Copyvio Detector 543:Remaining Cast Announced 269:action at this point. - 1264:And there we have it.-- 1242:15:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 1222:13:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 1202:04:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 1179:03:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 1160:03:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 1145:03:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 1128:02:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 1113:02:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 931:19:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC) 909:20:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 895:00:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 880:00:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 866:22:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC) 851:22:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC) 837:19:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC) 816:19:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC) 802:19:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC) 779:18:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC) 756:20:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC) 1484:Reach Out to the Truth 76:My Entertainment World 2004:two or less episodes) 307:Most Wanted cast info 123:C&D press release 42:of past discussions. 1536:User:DisneyMetalhead 352:is as "NEW ON HULU". 303:Legion press release 1318:manner. Cheers. -- 790:I Love You, America 761:FWIW - Upfront logo 2221:this article state 1930:other stuff exists 1246:Looks like it is: 1707:from the article 1047:Marvel's Runaways 1009: 993:comment added by 786:The Looming Tower 509:Marvel Television 369:Marvel's Runaways 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2324: 2115: 2063: 2053:It is certainly 2010: 1995: 1986:personal attacks 1968: 1881: 1863: 1835:Copyvio concerns 1817: 1770: 1531:Character powers 1433:User:Favre1fan93 1397: 1323: 82:(working title: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2301:WP:TVPRODUCTION 2213: 2113: 2061: 2001: 1991: 1966: 1906: 1875: 1861: 1837: 1815: 1768: 1705: 1703:January 9, 2018 1664: 1629:DisneyMetalhead 1583:DisneyMetalhead 1579: 1563:DisneyMetalhead 1533: 1518:DisneyMetalhead 1437:DisneyMetalhead 1390:DisneyMetalhead 1387: 1385: 1347:DisneyMetalhead 1321: 1301:DisneyMetalhead 1171:DisneyMetalhead 1152:DisneyMetalhead 1137:DisneyMetalhead 1105:DisneyMetalhead 1051:DisneyMetalhead 1035: 982: 938: 763: 691: 651: 545: 353: 119: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2330: 2328: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2264: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2187: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2156:Jack Sebastian 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2097:Jack Sebastian 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2051: 2039: 2026:Jack Sebastian 2021: 2013: 2012: 2011: 1999: 1996: 1979: 1978: 1957: 1933: 1911:Jack Sebastian 1905: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1888:TriiipleThreat 1878:Jack Sebastian 1842:Jack Sebastian 1836: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1800:71.121.143.161 1796: 1795: 1794: 1752:71.121.143.161 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1704: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1663: 1662:Episode Titles 1660: 1659: 1658: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1532: 1529: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1384: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1281:TriiipleThreat 1276: 1266:TriiipleThreat 1230:Doctor Strange 1205: 1204: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1085:Doctor Strange 1081: 1080: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 981: 978: 977: 976: 937: 936:New comic book 934: 923:50.232.205.246 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 887:AnonWikiEditor 858:AnonWikiEditor 843:AnonWikiEditor 821: 820: 819: 818: 794:AnonWikiEditor 788:and again for 762: 759: 748:TriiipleThreat 744: 743: 733:TriiipleThreat 690: 687: 686: 685: 656:Doctor Strange 650: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 552:AnonWikiEditor 544: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 513:AnonWikiEditor 505:Marvel Studios 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 373:AnonWikiEditor 347: 345: 344: 343: 333:AnonWikiEditor 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 160:primary source 118: 115: 114: 113: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2329: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2254: 2253: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2243: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2222: 2218: 2210: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2117: 2116: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2056: 2052: 2050:enlightening. 2048: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2005: 2000: 1997: 1994: 1990: 1989: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1962: 1958: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1903: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1879: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1834: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1787: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1748: 1745: 1737: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1728: 1719: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1710: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548:206.81.136.61 1545: 1541: 1537: 1530: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1395: 1391: 1382: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1339: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1209: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1040: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 986: 979: 975: 971: 967: 962: 961: 960: 959: 955: 951: 947: 942: 935: 933: 932: 928: 924: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 883: 882: 881: 877: 873: 869: 868: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 839: 838: 834: 830: 826: 817: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 782: 781: 780: 776: 772: 768: 760: 758: 757: 753: 749: 742: 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 727: 723: 719: 714: 712: 708: 704: 700: 695: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 671: 670: 669: 665: 661: 657: 648: 638: 634: 630: 626: 625:First Avenger 622: 618: 614: 613: 612: 608: 604: 600: 597:anywhere for 596: 592: 591: 590: 586: 582: 578: 577: 576: 572: 568: 564: 563: 562: 561: 557: 553: 549: 542: 536: 532: 528: 524: 523: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 459: 458: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 415: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 384: 383: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 360: 356: 351: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 299: 280: 276: 272: 267: 266: 265: 261: 257: 253: 252: 251: 247: 243: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 223: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 204: 203: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 175: 174: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 156: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 138: 137: 136: 132: 128: 124: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 99: 98: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 74:According to 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2283:WP:STATUSQUO 2217:WP:STATUSQUO 2214: 2184: 2118: 2111: 2082:Brownshoes22 2079: 2066: 2059: 2016: 2007: 2002: 1992: 1971: 1964: 1949: 1907: 1904:Cast section 1866: 1859: 1838: 1820: 1813: 1790: 1783: 1773: 1766: 1749: 1746: 1742: 1735: 1724: 1717: 1706: 1665: 1626: 1580: 1534: 1515: 1478:Here we go. 1386: 1342:New Warriors 1341: 1337: 1326: 1319: 1297: 1229: 1214:Cambalachero 1210: 1206: 1168: 1150:interview.-- 1120:Cambalachero 1100: 1084: 1082: 1065: 1046: 1043: 1038: 1036: 989:— Preceding 983: 950:Cambalachero 943: 939: 919: 840: 822: 764: 745: 718:Cambalachero 715: 696: 692: 660:Cambalachero 655: 652: 624: 620: 619:on the main 617:The Avengers 616: 599:Agent Carter 598: 595:The Avengers 594: 546: 508: 504: 399:By the way, 368: 350:on Hulu page 310: 221: 120: 83: 79: 73: 60: 43: 37: 2287:Favre1fan93 2268:Joeyconnick 2226:Favre1fan93 2189:Weeb Dingle 1946:PROTAGONIST 1689:Favre1fan93 1612:Favre1fan93 1491:Perfect. - 1466:Favre1fan93 1419:Favre1fan93 1415:This source 1394:Favre1fan93 1365:Favre1fan93 1345:offended.-- 1279:concepts.-- 1234:Favre1fan93 1097:Tina Minoru 1093:Kevin Feige 1019:Favre1fan93 966:Favre1fan93 964:general. - 829:Favre1fan93 808:Favre1fan93 771:Favre1fan93 649:Tina Minoru 629:Favre1fan93 567:Favre1fan93 527:Favre1fan93 367:That's not 256:Favre1fan93 227:Favre1fan93 179:Favre1fan93 162:as well. - 146:Favre1fan93 142:Adamstom.97 103:Favre1fan93 78:, Marvel's 36:This is an 2242:MOS:TVCAST 2129:adamstom97 2055:INUNIVERSE 1942:INUNIVERSE 1882:Examples? 1673:DinoSlider 1666:Here is a 1648:adamstom97 1644:WP:TVIMAGE 1598:adamstom97 1493:DinoSlider 1452:DinoSlider 1400:DinoSlider 1252:DinoSlider 1194:DinoSlider 1070:adamstom97 901:DinoSlider 872:DinoSlider 675:adamstom97 603:adamstom97 581:DinoSlider 477:DinoSlider 463:Mike210381 449:DinoSlider 435:Mike210381 405:adamstom97 387:Mike210381 355:Mike210381 319:Mike210381 271:DinoSlider 242:adamstom97 208:adamstom97 193:DinoSlider 164:DinoSlider 127:Mike210381 2043:WP:TVCAST 1937:CONSENSUS 1725:from the 995:Bflaminio 61:Archive 1 1789:Runaways 1747:Thanks. 1480:From CBR 1383:Old Lace 1338:Runaways 1101:Runaways 1066:Marvel's 1044:Runaways 1039:Runaways 1015:Deadline 1003:contribs 991:unsigned 431:The Wrap 427:Collider 401:Deadline 311:Runaways 309:. About 222:Runaways 80:Runaways 2020:stupid. 1727:Release 423:TV Line 84:Rugrats 39:archive 2305:Brojam 1961:stated 1668:review 1542:, and 1299:Bam.-- 1248:source 705:, and 621:Carter 2247:as : 2219:from 1954:state 1792:2018. 1709:intro 1316:civil 823:Also 689:Genre 348:Also 88:FBISD 16:< 2309:talk 2291:talk 2272:talk 2263:VFX. 2255:(): 2230:talk 2193:talk 2160:talk 2133:talk 2114:Alex 2101:talk 2086:talk 2062:Alex 2030:talk 2017:only 1967:Alex 1950:This 1915:talk 1892:talk 1862:Alex 1846:talk 1816:Alex 1804:talk 1769:Alex 1756:talk 1693:talk 1677:talk 1652:talk 1646:. - 1633:talk 1616:talk 1602:talk 1587:talk 1577:Logo 1567:talk 1552:talk 1544:here 1540:here 1522:talk 1497:talk 1470:talk 1456:talk 1441:talk 1423:talk 1404:talk 1392:and 1369:talk 1351:talk 1340:and 1322:Alex 1305:talk 1285:talk 1270:talk 1256:talk 1238:talk 1218:talk 1198:talk 1186:Here 1175:talk 1156:talk 1141:talk 1124:talk 1109:talk 1089:here 1074:talk 1064:The 1055:talk 1023:talk 999:talk 970:talk 954:talk 946:here 927:talk 905:talk 891:talk 876:talk 862:talk 847:talk 833:talk 825:this 812:talk 798:talk 775:talk 767:here 752:talk 737:talk 722:talk 711:here 707:here 703:here 699:here 679:talk 664:talk 633:talk 627:. - 607:talk 601:. - 585:talk 571:talk 556:talk 531:talk 517:talk 481:talk 467:talk 453:talk 439:talk 409:talk 391:talk 377:talk 359:talk 337:talk 323:talk 275:talk 260:talk 246:talk 231:talk 212:talk 197:talk 183:talk 168:talk 150:talk 131:talk 107:talk 92:talk 2252:or 2006:... 1926:BRD 1858:-- 1431:As 792:) - 429:or 371:. - 305:or 2311:) 2293:) 2274:) 2232:) 2195:) 2162:) 2135:) 2103:) 2088:) 2045:: 2032:) 1988:: 1917:) 1894:) 1848:) 1806:) 1798:-- 1784:is 1758:) 1750:-- 1729:: 1711:: 1695:) 1679:) 1654:) 1635:) 1618:) 1604:) 1589:) 1569:) 1554:) 1524:) 1499:) 1472:) 1458:) 1443:) 1425:) 1406:) 1371:) 1353:) 1307:) 1287:) 1272:) 1258:) 1250:- 1240:) 1220:) 1200:) 1177:) 1158:) 1143:) 1126:) 1111:) 1076:) 1057:) 1025:) 1005:) 1001:• 972:) 956:) 929:) 907:) 893:) 878:) 864:) 849:) 835:) 814:) 800:) 777:) 754:) 739:) 724:) 701:, 681:) 666:) 635:) 609:) 587:) 573:) 558:) 533:) 519:) 483:) 469:) 455:) 441:) 425:, 421:, 419:EW 411:) 393:) 379:) 361:) 339:) 325:) 277:) 262:) 248:) 233:) 214:) 199:) 185:) 170:) 152:) 133:) 125:. 109:) 94:) 2307:( 2289:( 2270:( 2228:( 2191:( 2158:( 2131:( 2099:( 2084:( 2028:( 1956:. 1913:( 1890:( 1880:: 1876:@ 1844:( 1802:( 1754:( 1691:( 1675:( 1650:( 1631:( 1614:( 1600:( 1585:( 1565:( 1550:( 1520:( 1495:( 1468:( 1454:( 1439:( 1421:( 1402:( 1396:: 1388:@ 1367:( 1349:( 1303:( 1283:( 1268:( 1254:( 1236:( 1216:( 1196:( 1173:( 1154:( 1139:( 1122:( 1107:( 1072:( 1053:( 1021:( 997:( 968:( 952:( 925:( 903:( 889:( 885:- 874:( 860:( 845:( 831:( 810:( 796:( 773:( 750:( 735:( 720:( 677:( 662:( 631:( 605:( 583:( 569:( 554:( 550:- 529:( 515:( 479:( 465:( 451:( 437:( 407:( 389:( 375:( 357:( 335:( 321:( 273:( 258:( 244:( 229:( 210:( 195:( 181:( 166:( 148:( 129:( 105:( 90:( 50:.

Index

Talk:Runaways (TV series)
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
My Entertainment World
FBISD
talk
04:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Favre1fan93
talk
04:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
C&D press release
Mike210381
talk
22:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Adamstom.97
Favre1fan93
talk
04:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
primary source
DinoSlider
talk
04:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Favre1fan93
talk
05:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
DinoSlider
talk
05:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
adamstom97

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑