150:
newspaper, book, or magazine that had been previously published, on the web or in paper form, I would consider it private, but since, the author merely reports facts that others may validate, and these facts are not original ideas or works of fiction, I believe there is no copyright infringement, whatsoever. The author is a former member of the group that lived there is merely providing recollections as facts about the place. The author did not indicate in any way on his site, on the home page, or within the text or surrounding text of the article that this was his original copyright work, nor issue any disclaimers or warnings. The bot picked up on the source's digital identifier, but has no way to know if there was an infringement. I would prefer not to be tried by a bot, but do appreciate the opportunity to research copyright law further, and provide this explanation.
71:
53:
81:
22:
149:
This article has been placed in the public domain, not as an original work of fiction or art, but as public information to be redistributed as common knowledge or fact, which is not held to the copyright laws, and would not constitute intellectual property. If this article had originated from a
161:
I've started a basic edit and clean-up of this article, removing several duplications and potential copyvio text in the process. The article still needs work and better references but I've run out of time to do
142:"Works in the public domain include those whose once valid US copyright has expired and works otherwise dedicated to the public either voluntarily or by operation of law" (Barbara, Webmaster, lawyer,
190:
109:
105:
95:
58:
185:
33:
21:
167:
39:
143:
163:
153:
ALSO note: ISBN-10: 1107014611 Constructing
Intellectual Property, Dr. Alexandra George
104:-related issues on Knowledge. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
179:
86:
70:
52:
76:
171:
101:
100:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
15:
144:
http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/what-is-public-domain.html
8:
47:
19:
49:
7:
157:Cleanup and removal of copyvio text
38:It is of interest to the following
118:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
14:
191:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
121:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
79:
69:
51:
20:
92:This article is of interest to
1:
207:
172:18:11, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
64:
46:
186:Stub-Class LGBT articles
96:WikiProject LGBT studies
28:This article is rated
108:or contribute to the
34:content assessment
140:
139:
136:
135:
132:
131:
198:
126:
125:
122:
119:
116:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
206:
205:
201:
200:
199:
197:
196:
195:
176:
175:
159:
123:
120:
117:
114:
113:
85:
80:
78:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
204:
202:
194:
193:
188:
178:
177:
158:
155:
138:
137:
134:
133:
130:
129:
127:
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
203:
192:
189:
187:
184:
183:
181:
174:
173:
169:
165:
156:
154:
151:
147:
145:
128:
124:LGBT articles
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
97:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
164:CharlieDelta
160:
152:
148:
141:
115:LGBT studies
106:project page
94:
93:
87:LGBTQ portal
59:LGBT studies
40:WikiProjects
180:Categories
110:discussion
30:Stub-class
162:more.--
36:scale.
102:LGBTQ
168:talk
182::
170:)
146:)
166:(
112:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
