Talk:WWE SmackDown/Archive 1

1500:

ratings in the past few weeks as RAW tends to have inconsistent viewers. To say that Smackdown is the B show because it has lower ratings and less well known superstars and storylines, well to me thats bull!!!! If the WWE wanted to increase Smackdown ratings then why not run promos during RAW or advertise on the CW more times that its usual one or two. Take some of the big superstars from RAW and place them on Smackdown and increase the writing staff for Smackdown or use some of RAW writers. RAW and the WWE are scared that Smackdown can and is better than RAW.

160:

that, but it's not balanced, because it doesn't represent the opinions of those who may believe otherwise, or site names or sources for these supposed opinions. I believe that SmackDown! isn't getting the same star power or creative attention that Raw is getting also, but without credible sources or polls, there's just no way to prove it. I've completely rewritten the section, and hopefully that should clear up the problems while preserving what I think was the original writer's intent. --

2271: 31: 873:

unimportant to provide a preview of the season premiere and to include that Tribune stations aired SmackDown! in the absence of a UPN affiliate. The Hawaii and Salt Lake City information may also be irrelevant. Also, Hawaii may get SmackDown! through an arrangement with another affiliate of a major network, much as the WWE did when the show aired on UPN in markets lacking a UPN affiliate.

717:(all Smackdown! at the time), at the time, were not in the leauge of their RAW counterparts but still gave a superior show. This is a lot because of the quality of matches, the fact that, at this time, the show was under Paul Heyman managment, and because RAW was focused more on entertainment/controversal(attitude era style) storylines than anything else. 480:

the programming was overtaken by CBS and broadcasted an episode of Big Brother 6. At the bottom of the screen was a ticker-tape announcing that Smackdown would be on the following night (Friday). Did this happen to anyone else? Did the change come a week earlier than expected? If so, the date should be reverted back to September 2nd to avoid conflict. --

821:

everything, and it appears on the WWE homepage. It doesn't even have it's own PPV's. Calling ECW a true promotion is like saying that people were interested by the Junior Division. I'll call ECW a promotion just because it had done so much for wrestling, but it's no different from Raw or Smackdown. RAW= A Brand ECW= B Brand Smackdown= C Brand(FOR NOW)

579:- As far as I can remember, this was never actually openly announced. It came about because SD's Melina challenged Trish to a match, obviously, but I also seem to remember Melina promising to bring the title "to Smackdown", which would imply that the title was and is still brand specific, and that this was purely a one-off event. Might be wrong though. 85:"In early to mid-2001 (NOT 2002), World Wrestling Federation (NOT Entertainment at that time) underwent something they called the “Brand Extension”. Basically, this meant that the two WWE television shows (RAW and SmackDown!) would become competition for each other. This came about a year BEFORE WWE purchased their two biggest competitors, WCW and ECW." 573:"In December 2005, WWE announced that the WWE Women's Championship will now be defended by the Champion to Divas on both shows." Not that I am disputing this, becuase I can't of the reason that I missed a few PPVs and a Friday Night Episode but where was this stated? Or orginated from? Please add information on this we appericate it. 888:

upcoming video game "WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2007" is spelled without the exclamation point, even though last year's game included it. This should prove that the official show title is now "WWE Friday Night SmackDown" WITHOUT the exclamation point, and that 3bulletproof16 should not have changed the title back. --

1595:

I know Chris Beniot retain the title at Wrestlemania 23 & Backlash because he's staying on Smackdown Brand but not moving to RAW Brand or ECW Brand just yet. But he has been champion for 6 months, 29 weeks & 206 days (as of 5/4/07), now and his 5th & current reign is longer than his other

1111:

states, It is not beneficial to the mission of Knowledge (XXG) to copy the usage of corporate logos if they interfere with the prose. It seems that WWE agrees with this, as they don't use the exclamation point when writing about the show. It should also be noted that "official name" rationales have

951:

Ok, SD vs Raw 2007 shows the SD logo without the exclamation point. WWE's website has dropped the exclamation point, including from the official logo. However, the TV show itself still shows the exclamation point in it's graphics, making me confused on the official status of the exclamation point.

787:

Does it deserve mentioning in this article that My Network TV stations may or will (in the case of Fox Television Stations Group MNT stations) drop UPN programming, perhaps leaving SmackDown! in limbo in several television markets in the United States? To my knowledge, the WWE has yet to acknowledge

533:

Even when it airs outside of the US on Thursdays, "Friday Night SmackDown!" is what the show is called by the announcers, and "Friday Night SmackDown!" is what appears on every logo and chyron. Point being, "Friday Night" is now part of the name of the program, and not merely a descriptive adjunct.

479:

I made a minor edit to make the article say the change would happen on Friday, September 2nd. Although the WWE has been hyping it up and saying "September 9th" (also the date on the article), my local cable provider (Comcast) broadcasted Smackdown on Friday, September 2nd. On Thursday, September 1st,

457:

I didn't have much of a problem with the section when it was first added, but the SmackDown! vs. RAW section is mainly rambling about "dominant brand" and which title is more important and rather than citing specific sources it makes general statements like "some fans" etc. – it's bordering on being

217:

Juventud, Psychosis, and Super Crazy all appeared on the latest Velocity, during which the commentators commented that all three had joined the Smackdown brand and talked about how they looked forward to what the three could contribute to the Cruiserweight division. I think it's safe to say they're

2021:

We know that. It has been discussed before. WWE.com uses different logos than they do in their actual programs. Just take a look at AM Raw. the logo used on their site is different than the one that is currently used. Bottom line is that WP:PW uses the logos from the actual programs, not those show

1634:

Smackdown is taped on Tuesdays because Raw is taped Mondays. It makes sense from a logistical and financial standpoint to tape on 2 consecutive days, (actually 3 consecutive days when there is a Sunday pay-per-view), in cities relatively close to each other. For example, if Raw is in Cleveland on a

1444:

I'm confused about your notion of "worth moving" and what exactly you mean by it. It's not as if moving a page is a Herculean effort. That said, I don't think the point of this move request is to "simplify" so much as to bring the page in line with the usage that the Manual of Style calls for and

922:

That video is enough proof for me. I hadn't seen the new intro video since I never watch SmackDown! anymore. I also didn't know that the previous logo is now being used again in certain situations. I just wonder why WWE.com has stopped using the exclamation point even though it is still featured

273:

If we cannot trust WWE's own commentators as an authority on WWE, who can we trust? The notoriously out-of-date (for anybody who isn't a main eventer) bios on WWE.com? The fact remains that Josh Matthews confirmed on national television that Psychosis, Super Crazy, and Juventud are members of the

159:

Renaming the section doesn't mask its major POV issues. Nearly every statement in that section is speculatory and unproven. Whether or not few, some, most, or all fans believe SD! is the "poor cousin" of Raw, and I understand why it was put in there, that kind of statement isn't objective. Not only

593:

In this article something is mentioned about not using the traditional role of acting as though smackdown! is not pre-recorded. If that were really the case, then how would they get people to show up for the smackdown event on tuesday? I realize, I am being a little nitpicky and that is the reason

1499:

It has been said many times that Smackdown is the "B" show of the WWE. Whatever, if Smackdown is the "b" show then someone tell me why in the world in 2004 and 2005, in the Smackdown vs. RAW matches, Smackdown pulled out both wins.?? Please, someone tell me why Smackdown has shown an increase in

977:. The fact that WWE does not find a need to use it when they write about the show themselves should be enough evidence to convince the "official name" crowd that it is possible to use something besides what is "official" when you write about a TV show. The exclamation point should be dropped. 887:

On WWE.com, all references to the show are listed as "SmackDown" without the exclamation point. Recently, the exclamation point was removed from the show's official logo and the WWE logo was added above it. This was most likely done around the time the show moved from UPN to The CW. Also, the

804:

I removed this information, as it is not validated by WWE. My belief is that ECW is a third brand, separate from the two current WWE brands. WWE cancelled Velocity, and used its open spot to leverage ECW onto international markets. Therefore, ECW has its own wrestlers, although it is open to

820:

I hate to say it, but Smackdown is no longer the B Brand. Nope. It's the C Brand. Since pulling ratings that are lower that one hour of ECW, I think it is justified. Some people will say that ECW isn't a brand but an entirely different promotion. Well, ECW is owned by WWE, Vince has all say on

138:

I gave it a second look, and you're right. The following statement does need a credible reference though: "The creative team of SmackDown! have also voiced their disapproval of the WWE's attitude towards SmackDown!, at WrestleMania 21, the WWE Championship match pitting John Cena against John

872:

Burlington does have a CW affiliate (secondary on WFFF, plus they recieve WPIX from New York on cable), so I removed that statement and revised it to just show Hawaii as lacking a CW affiliate. It might be speculative and current event material in the section at that moment. It is probably

1282:

does not use the exclamation point when they write about the show. Many respected wrestling publications such as Pro Wrestling Torch do not use the decorative punctuation. "Official name" rationales have consistently been rejected as valid reasons to ignore the Manual of Style, such as in

1526:

Smackdown has been the B show since it began. Raw is live whilst Smackdown is taped then edited. Whenever a wrestler comes back (Hogan, Foley, Austin) they go on RAW because it has the most viewers and is on the better network. I'm sure that WWE want all three brands to do well but for the

1423:

For the record, I would be fine with moving the article to WWE SmackDown or something similar if that makes a difference to anyone. Would those in opposition change their minds if the exclamation point disappeared from the TV broadcast the way it has disappeared from the website?

1688:

does anybody think that it should be added that since the brad extension, Smackdown is the first show to not have 4 but 5 champions on there show. I think this and that there the first show to have someone on there brand to win a title from another show and stay on there show.

93:, the brand split took place on March 26, 2002. This is consistent with my personal memories of the split (as the Invasion was over befgore the split happened; in fact, the entire reason for the split was the extremely large roster they had acquired as part of the WCW purchase!) 1445:

the usage that publications such as WWE.com and PW Torch have already adopted. Again, though, for the editors using the "it's still on TV" rationale--would you change your mind if the exclamation point were no longer used on TV the way it's no longer used on the website?

1635:

Monday, Smackdown will be in, say Pittsburgh the next night. Makes it easy for the production crews, all the equipment that needs moved, etc. The crews can work two consecutive days then be done and back home, instead of having the tapings spaced out several days apart.

998:

Yeah, I have to say I was confused about the ending of this RM discussion. I can't see why divided support for moving and "official name" rationales, which have generally not been accepted as reasons to ignore the MoS, translates to a consensus for "do not move".

1664:

I remember back in 2003 when Stone Cold & Eric Bischoff were co-general managers of RAW from 4/28 to 11/16, then Mick Foley shared the same duties as Bischoff from 12/1 to 12/15. But is it true if Vickie Guerrero & Theodore Long will co-gms of Smackdown or

645:

Here in Canada, I get to see it twice (On Thursday on The Score, 9:00 PM PST), and the next day, on Friday, the time when SD is on depends (Re-airs on The Score @ Noon PST), and then on 8:00 PM PST on UPN (I'm guessing this is the airtime it's supposed to be on).

1434:

I just don't think it's worth moving for the sake of deleting the exclamation mark. If we're going to simplify it considerably then I'd support removing the punctuation at that point on the grounds that it's redundant, whether or not the WWE continue its use.

1728:

No idea what happened to it, but I wouldn't have though it particularly valuable, since presumably it relates only to the USA. Not sure where you get the "A show" "B show" and "No show" tags from, but I would be inclined to call RAW the "A show" in any case.

1926:

I'm not sure where to get it, but SD!'s current logo is different than the one listed on the page. The new one is more of a comic book-style to complement the show's opening. Edit: Not sure why this is appearing in the Requested Move box. It's unintentional.

1124:

WWE.com and SVR07 are listing the name without the ! and if u look at the OvalTron in the arena of SmackDown u will see the old logo without the !. It's only used on TV so viewers still know its the same show. It should be moved from SmackDown! to SmackDown.

767:

Unfortunately, everything you just mentioned is, at best, a matter of opinion. I fear the best you're going to find as far as a reliable source to back up your claims is opinion pieces, and those just don't pass here. However, welcome in as a new editor.

788:

whether SmackDown! would consider going on hiatus for the two weeks prior to the launch of the CW, choose to stream their show through WWE.com, or offer a best of SmackDown! (or similar package of previously shown SmackDown! shows) run for the final weeks.

727:

WWE PPV's at the time a Smackdown! match would be the show stealer(Unforgiven, No Mercy, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble etc.), as well as Edge, Benoit, Guerrero, and Angle all became increasingly popular around their tenure of Smackdown! in 2002.

1679:

I know that the smackdown entrance stage , with the fist going threw the glass is up , but where is the version with the mini trons at the side , and the ovaltron? i really would like it if someone could put some more photos of them up please.

551:

The list of champions was reverted back to a table. The list is really simple - it just consists of the Championship name and the wrestler(s) holding that championship. While it may look better as a table, it's simple enough for a list. See

243:

Being identified as Smackdown wrestlers by the commentators and wrestling as such on national TV produced by the WWE seems an awful lot like confirmation. WWE.com is not the sole arbiter of truth. Also, Velocity, while a minor show,

1743:

King Leonidas is a new Smackdown superstar who has yet to debut on the show but his profile has been added to the Smackdown superstar page on WWE.com, shouldn't he be added to the superstar page on wikipedia under smackdown roster?

952:

I'm inclined to say they will drop it from TV as well shortly, but I think we should keep the status quo until the change is made on TV as well. Otherwise, WWE's just sending mixed messages on the status of the exclamation point.

618:

It's supposed to air Friday night at 8:00 PM, but there have been so many preemptions for baseball games (particularly in the Boston and New York markets) that it has all too often been pushed back to a late Saturday airing.

361:

What's the difference between "fired" and "released"? I was reading the Past Wrestlers section, and for the first half of the list, the wrestlers were "fired". I think what "fired" means is to be released from the company

1724:

What ever happened to the ratings page that showed the ratings for SMACKDOWN (The A Show), RAW (The B Show), and ECW (The No Show)?????????? CAN I PUT IT BACK UP OR IS THERE A REASON WHY IT WAS TAKEN OFF THE FIRST PLACE?

720:

Of course ratings cant speak for it because Smackdown! always had lower ratings than RAW. Some sort of evidence could be formulated by this like the necropillia storyline (added in wrestlecrap) on RAW, as well as

96:

I'm going to revert the page to reflect this. If you have any reputable sources that the split actually took place in 2001, please inform me (and I will have my head examined, as I obviously have false memories).

706:

However, one ought to point out at some the results in late 2002. While RAW was meant to be a stronger show with the more over (popular/well known) talents on that show. Smackdown! did create a "GEM" on its own.

987:

2085:

SmackDown! was created before WCW was over so NO. SmackDown! was created to compete with WCW Thunder. After the brand extension in 2002, most of SmackDown!'s wrestlers were a combination of WWE, WCW, and ECW.

1898:"Friday Night" is as has never changed since it became that, thats not going to change. The most recent intro on SmackDown! listed it with the exclamation point, so I'm siding with keeping the title as is. — 439:

I'm not sure if we should have a "Current events" section. I don't think Knowledge (XXG) is intended for this purpose. You don't see many articles on TV series recounting ongoing events from the series.

291:

I am the original person who typed in that Psicosis, Juventud, and Super Crazy were part of the Smackdown! roster an everyone kept on deleting it. Now it is not posted on WWE.com, but was confirmed on

1966:

The logo is the current logo used for the show. It is used in the current graphics, ring apron, and other videos promoting the show (Friday Night SmackDown!) and the brand (SmackDown!). See the link

1552:

Recently, I've noticed Smackdown International being aired on tv. It's shows the same events as normal Smackdown but is only one hour long, can anyone elaborate? and should it be put in the article.

404:

I could be wrong, but most of those wrestlers listed in the wrestlers who appear sporadically for WWE section have ever appeared on SmackDown! in years--they all have mostly appeared just for RAW.

375:

In this case, fired and released mean the same thing, let go of the company. Fired doesn't always mean some kind of wrongdoing. If it will make you happy, I will change the wording under the

2185:

I think the only time SmackDown ever aired live was the one that aired right after 9/11 (since 9/11 was on a Tuesday, they cancelled the taping and decided to do it live on Thursday night).

366:. Lately people have been released either because their contracts ended and the wrestler and/or WWE agreed not to renew, or they've just been laid off. Should we change the wording? -- 1262: 689:"Rumored to be fed up with WWE and possibly leave". The hell? First of all, where did this come from? And second, does this even warrant mention in the current announcers section? 127:

I don't know that it's POV, since it doesn't assert the opinions, it merely reports them. As for something to back it up, one need only visit any wrestling fan forum, for example

703:

Hi im a nood here, but I would like to point out something. While it is believed that Smackdown! is now the "B" show of the WWE, its intention was such since the beginning.

1537:

This is the talk page for this article, used to discuss changes to the article, NOT a forum! If you want to talk about if Smackdown is better than RAW, go to a forum.

116:

I'm calling into question the fan opinion section - it seems pov, particularly since it doesn't have anything to back it up. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? --

2089:

I believe he's referring to the US and CW belts orignally being WCW's as well as the WHC sharing the design of the old WCW Championship. Either way, not notable, OR.

710:

As mentioned, the intention of RAW is to have the more "entertaining"(hence better) program with bigger names and controversal storylines (necrophillia and HLA).

1466:

says that camelcase is a judgment call. I personally don't object to it, but I'd have supported the move if it also sought to change the second capital as well.

1291:. Besides, if WWE does not use the exclamation point when they write about the show, that seems to poke holes in the idea that it is somehow more "official". 538:" airs on tape-delay in some markets, and technically the bulk of the show airs on Sunday -- yet this does not warrant a mention at the head of that article. 104:

That's correct, it did happen after the Invasion angle but before the name change. The name was changed about a few weeks to a month later (from my memory).

1527:

foreseeable future RAW will be seen as the better show. Some would say that Smackdown is better in terms of wrestling whilst RAW is better for storylines.

1310:- The exclaimation has been a part of the name and signmark since the show's inception. It should be viewed much in the same way that the exclaimation in 1503: 713:

However, this was not always the case. Smackdown!, not having bigger stars, created their own stars. This is true especially with the Smackdown 6.

1261:

on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is

1879:

The program is still called Friday Night Smackdown and it says that on the new logo, so the ! can go. But it needs to keep the Friday Night part.

235:- It does not matter. If WWE does not list whomever on their roster then they are not officially part of SmackDown! until they are listed. - 825:

Okay, I can dig it, but what are you asking us to do, if anything? Remember, this isn't for casual discussion about the article's subject.

758: 376: 2252: 2220: 1784:

During the show's run, Lillian Garcia, Justin Roberts & Howard Finkel are the 3 who occasionally fill-in if Tony Chimel is not present.

1651: 459: 2194:

Actually, there was a streak in 2000 and 2001 in which SmackDown! was live on the East Coast. I'll see if I can find a source for this. --

1760: 1626: 1515: 1399: 501:

remains on Thursday nights elsewhere... How I can include this without disrupting the delicate balance this is quite the problem...

930:

Wow, that video means nothing, since that was back in SEPTEMBER! It was AFTER that when WWE began dropping the exclamation point.

2173: 2064: 840:

Any objections to adding the "current event" box for the next 2 weeks w/ the UPN closure/Smackdown on Tribune stuff going on? --

731:

While "Smackdown! 6" isnt really a commonly accepted term. Another way to describle this that Smackdown!, at the time, was the "

1810:

no longer uses the exclamation point when writing about the program. It is also purely decorative, which does not comply with

1057:

no longer uses the exclamation point when writing about the program. It is also purely decorative, which does not comply with

805:

wrestlers switching brands. Currently, HEAT seems to be a sister show to the Raw brand, although that may be open to debate.

1814:. We should also change the Friday Night part to make it shorter because there is no need to call it Friday Night Smackdown! 553: 209:

roster or I will keep referring to you as an idiot in the history page or in this discussion page if you ever reply. :) -

254: 2311: 2306: 2159:

I don't know when the last live SD! was, but I do believe that would warrant a mention in the special episodes section.

1568: 71: 66: 1950:

I reverted a change because the logo was a redlink, although now it is displaying correctly I have no problem with it.

1870:

I don't think the "Friday Night" part should be omitted, as they still use that, but the ! indeed is no longer used. --

1488:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1454:

If we're changing it to meet the criteria in the Manual of Style, shouldn't the second capital also be removed then? --

1204:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1184:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1018:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

274:

Smackdown roster. If anybody adds Essa Rios again, feel free to delete him again, but those three are in like Flynn.--

1799: 1600: 1218: 1046: 331:

Am I the only one who things this article needs to be called WWE SmackDown! to make it like its counterpart, WWE RAW?

296: 2278: 1222: 1050: 38: 858: 754: 139:"Bradshaw" Layfield was cut short and made to feel less important so as not to overshadow the Raw main-event." -- 608:

Can someone till me what time SmackDown airs in the US? I'm in the UK so I think it comes on over here first. --

89:

Actually, the Brand Extension took place after the WCW/ECW Invasion, but before the name change. According to

2256: 2224: 1647: 1622: 407:

Should the wrestlers who appear sporadically for WWE section be moved to the WWE section or the RAW section?

1842:

on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

1756: 1511: 1089:

on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

509:

The article already mentions how countries like Canada and the UK get SmackDown! earlier than the US in the

2248: 2216: 1748: 1639: 1614: 1556: 1387: 746: 299:. None of you should ever try to insult me or anyone elses intelligence by calling us an idiot, namely you 2135:

Anyone know the last time SmackDown! was live? and if there is Don't you think it should be mentioned. --

2104: 1666: 1597: 1395: 750: 1785: 1643: 1910: 1752: 1730: 1702: 1618: 1507: 1455: 1436: 1372: 806: 789: 690: 665:

Here in New Zealnd, I get to see it three times (Sunday on SKY 1 at 6:45. Then Monday at 1:30 and 6:00!)

423: 391: 318: 874: 285:

Jerry Flynn is not a member of the Smackdown roster. He was last seen in The Block, taking all comers.

2167: 2074: 1711: 620: 2052:

Hey just putting this out there but doesn't it seem like Smackdown was built on the remains of WCW.

90: 2235:

Is what on? There is no "alliance", just an agreement to let superstars appear on the other brand.

2112: 2023: 1971: 1351: 1032: 902: 580: 574: 535: 347: 227:

This is true. Also, calling other well-meaning editors liars and idiots is counter-productive. --

2287: 2124: 1560: 1528: 1467: 1446: 1425: 1292: 1113: 1062: 1000: 978: 960: 938: 560: 466: 444: 370: 275: 219: 153: 143: 132: 120: 98: 47: 17: 1769:

It's just a joke. It's like how WWE listed "Nacho Libre" in their superstars section last year.

339:

I don't think it's as integral to the show's name as Raw's, but I wouldn't be opposed to it. --

782:

UPN/My Network TV Stations and the Possibility of SmackDown! Being Off the Air in Those Markets

1951: 1880: 1391: 149:

I renamed it to a name that seems to fit the topics discussed in it - "SmackDown! vs. RAW". --

2138: 2090: 1899: 1564: 1315: 1157: 769: 647: 609: 412: 380: 307: 265: 128: 2059: 194:

Just because WWE signed wrestlers to their company or because the wrestler(s) performed on

2162: 2069: 1997: 1288: 1126: 989: 826: 2001: 1996:

I found an image of the new one on wwe.com. This is the one they're using on the site.

1928: 1871: 1538: 1214: 1028: 2236: 2195: 2186: 1815: 1803: 1770: 1578: 1339: 1327: 1230: 1145: 953: 931: 841: 629: 557: 463: 441: 367: 340: 300: 236: 228: 210: 161: 150: 140: 117: 1610:

Can someone tell me why Smackdown is taped on Tuesdays? It just seems stupid to me!

2260: 2239: 2228: 2198: 2189: 2180: 2153: 2093: 2080: 2053: 2035: 2004: 1983: 1954: 1944: 1931: 1915: 1893: 1883: 1874: 1818: 1788: 1773: 1733: 1714: 1705: 1696: 1669: 1581: 1541: 1531: 1519: 1470: 1458: 1449: 1439: 1428: 1403: 1375: 1363: 1342: 1330: 1318: 1295: 1237: 1160: 1148: 1129: 1116: 1065: 1036: 1003: 992: 981: 967: 945: 914: 877: 844: 829: 809: 792: 772: 693: 676: 673: 650: 632: 623: 612: 598: 583: 563: 527: 517: 514: 502: 484: 481: 469: 447: 428: 350: 292: 411:

RAW already has that section, that list is for both brands not just SmackDown!. —

497:

Although that's technically the name of the show now, it's also to be noted that

2286:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1937: 1890: 1693: 924: 889: 332: 261: 258: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

628:

It's pre-empted in certain markets, SD has never been pre-empted where I live.

181:

roster is an idiot! i.e. Essa Rios, Super Crazy, Juventud, Garrison Cade etc.

1967: 898: 715:

Kurt Angle, Eddie Guerrero, Brock Lesnar, Rey Mysterio, Chris Benoit, and Edge

595: 594:

why I didn't delete it, because its not a big deal, but still think about it.

1144:

If you watch SmackDown, you will see they still used the exclamation point.

105: 2103:

Can someone add MVP's new segment "VIP Lounge" or whatever it's called?

1371:. If we're going to rename it, it should be simply to WWE Smackdown. -- 526:, it deserves a mention at the head of the article and not at the foot. 1284: 1104: 1807: 1054: 1811: 1463: 1311: 1226: 1108: 1058: 974: 2022:

on WWE.com. Just check out the video link from my comment above. --

489:

Friday Night SmackDown! is taped on Tuesdays and played on Fridays.

589:

Traditional role of acting as though smackdown! is not pre-recorded

346:

WWE isn't part of the name of the show. It isn't even in the logo.

1225:— The exclamation mark is decorative. The name should comply with 1936:

i tried changing it but somebody changed it back to the old one!

742:

Hope I get some replies soon to hear some feedback. Thanks guys!

1482:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

1198:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal.

1178:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

1012:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal.

723: 554:

Knowledge (XXG):How to use tables#When tables are inappropriate

177:

Whoever keeps adding people who ARE NOT confirmed to be on the

2265: 883:"WWE Friday Night SmackDown!" or "WWE Friday Night SmackDown"? 25: 1889:

I agree with him the ! can go but Friday Night needs to stay.

1338:

per EC. Also, this just got shot down less than a month ago.

1577:

Huh? I've never heard of that. What country do you live in?

1383:

As Milchama said, EC hit the nail on the head for this one.

1265:, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation. 973:

The exclamation point is decorative, which is a no-no per

205:

So to sum it up, DO NOT add wrestlers who are not on the

1998:

http://www.wwe.com/content/media/images/3883682/5054046

462:, which is not something Knowledge (XXG) is about. -- 1279: 1590: 799:ECW as a Sister Program to the SmackDown! Brand? 1112:consistently been rejected in similar cases. 8: 1596:4 previous reigns (2 in WWE & 2 in WCW). 218:all an official part of the roster now. -- 1968:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rGMUrcwnT4 1587:England Jay316 22:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 853: 522:Yes, but seeing that the article title is 1591:Beniot's United States Championship Reign 1326:- EazieCheeze got it right on the mark. 2284:Do not edit the contents of this page. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1780:interim ring announcers on Smackdown! 1103:as nominator. Also note precedent of 377:List of previous SmackDown! wrestlers 188:worker then he or she is not part of 7: 198:DOES NOT make whomever an immediate 1156:The official name still has the !. 184:If WWE does not list whomever as a 2065: 1302:Survey - in opposition to the move 400:Wrestlers who appear sporadically? 24: 1720:WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RATINGS PAGE 1229:regardless of the official name. 253:Finally, please do not resort to 2269: 850:Someone is messing with the page 29: 1271:Survey - in support of the move 2168: 2070: 1916:01:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 878:01:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 830:10:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 518:19:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC) 364:due to some kind of wrongdoing 1: 2174: 2118: 2075: 2029: 1977: 1520:14:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1357: 1232: 1217:00:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1209:The result of the debate was 1161:01:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 1149:07:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 1117:08:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 1066:07:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 1023:The result of the debate was 982:11:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 968:05:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 961: 954: 946:05:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 939: 932: 908: 845:23:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 677:23:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 485:10:53, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 2261:02:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 2240:22:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2229:22:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2199:03:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2190:20:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 2181:13:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 2154:13:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 2113: 2024: 1972: 1864:Add any additional comments: 1471:13:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1459:13:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1450:21:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1440:17:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1429:11:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1418:Add any additional comments: 1404:20:52, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1376:22:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1364:21:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1352: 1343:21:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1331:17:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1319:17:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1296:10:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1238:09:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1173:Add any additional comments: 915:00:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 903: 564:21:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC) 351:23:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 248:part of the Smackdown brand. 2125:03:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2098: 1894:18:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1800:WWE Friday Night SmackDown! 1219:WWE Friday Night SmackDown! 1130:03:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 1047:WWE Friday Night SmackDown! 1037:02:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 1004:19:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 993:03:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 530:23:58:10, 2005-09-12 (UTC) 505:05:36:41, 2005-09-11 (UTC) 470:00:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 448:00:28, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 323:23:47, June 25, 2005 (UTC) 2330: 2245:that should be mentioned 2094:21:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 1582:23:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 1223:WWE Friday Night SmackDown 1051:WWE Friday Night SmackDown 810:01:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 793:19:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 613:09:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC) 599:08:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 453:SmackDown! vs. RAW section 135:18:05, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC) 129:The Inside Pulse Fan Forms 2081:19:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 2036:21:22, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 2005:05:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 1984:19:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 1955:00:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 1945:00:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 1932:05:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1884:00:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 1875:05:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1706:22:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 1697:20:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 1542:18:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1532:10:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 773:05:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 651:23:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 429:22:23, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 396:1:55, July 8, 2005 (UTC) 372:July 6, 2005 22:48 (UTC) 335:July 1, 2005 15:59 (UTC) 278:04:22, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) 231:19:18, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 222:06:23, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 156:18:14, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 123:17:56, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 108:06:05, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC) 101:17:38, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC) 1819:04:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 1789:22:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 1774:01:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 1734:21:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 1715:23:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 1670:16:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1485:Please do not modify it. 1201:Please do not modify it. 1181:Please do not modify it. 1015:Please do not modify it. 694:00:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 633:19:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 624:16:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC) 556:for more information. -- 343:July 6, 2005 22:18 (UTC) 327:SD! --) WWE SmackDown! ? 268:21:32, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) 164:July 8, 2005 18:48 (UTC) 146:18:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1601:15:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1548:Smackdown International 1495:Smackdown the "B" show? 923:on the show itself! -- 868:CW Network section edit 584:18:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 524:Friday Night SmackDown! 511:Friday Night SmackDown! 499:Friday Night SmackDown! 2209:ecw smackdown allience 2107:22:28, 17 August 2007 1848:Survey - Support votes 1095:Survey - Support votes 2282:of past discussions. 2111:It has been added.-- 1853:Survey - Oppose votes 1506:comment was added by 1136:Survey - Oppose votes 859:blanked as a courtesy 475:Friday Night Conflict 42:of past discussions. 604:USA SmackDown Airing 1660:Co-GMs of Smackdown 857:This page has been 735:" and RAW was the " 569:Womens Championship 536:Saturday Night Live 493:"Friday Night" POV? 379:section for you. — 173:Liars on the Roster 1960:i changed it back 1191:Requested move (2) 737:Entertainment Show 18:Talk:WWE SmackDown 2317: 2316: 2294: 2293: 2288:current talk page 2263: 2251:comment added by 2231: 2219:comment added by 2099:MVP's New Segment 1765: 1751:comment added by 1656: 1642:comment added by 1631: 1617:comment added by 1573: 1559:comment added by 1523: 1407: 1390:comment added by 865: 864: 763: 749:comment added by 699:The "Smackdown 6" 547:List of champions 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2321: 2303: 2296: 2295: 2273: 2272: 2266: 2246: 2214: 2178: 2176: 2170: 2165: 2149: 2147: 2145: 2122: 2117: 2077: 2072: 2067: 2033: 2028: 1981: 1976: 1941: 1913: 1908: 1905: 1902: 1764: 1745: 1655: 1636: 1630: 1611: 1572: 1553: 1501: 1487: 1406: 1384: 1361: 1356: 1234: 1203: 1183: 1017: 965: 958: 943: 936: 912: 907: 854: 762: 743: 460:original thought 426: 421: 418: 415: 394: 389: 386: 383: 321: 316: 313: 310: 255:personal attacks 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2299: 2270: 2211: 2163: 2161: 2143: 2141: 2139: 2133: 2105:SmackDown!RULES 2101: 2050: 1939: 1924: 1919: 1911: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1840: 1834: 1833:# '''Support''' 1826: 1797: 1782: 1746: 1741: 1722: 1686: 1677: 1667:134.124.143.149 1662: 1637: 1612: 1608: 1598:134.124.143.149 1593: 1554: 1550: 1502:—The preceding 1497: 1492: 1483: 1414: 1385: 1304: 1289:Thirtysomething 1273: 1259: 1253: 1252:# '''Support''' 1245: 1199: 1193: 1188: 1179: 1169: 1138: 1097: 1087: 1081: 1080:# '''Support''' 1073: 1044: 1013: 885: 870: 852: 842:David Bixenspan 838: 818: 801: 784: 751:Shooter mcgavin 744: 701: 687: 621:Tromboneguy0186 606: 591: 571: 549: 495: 477: 455: 437: 424: 419: 416: 413: 402: 392: 387: 384: 381: 359: 329: 319: 314: 311: 308: 175: 114: 82: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2327: 2325: 2315: 2314: 2309: 2304: 2292: 2291: 2274: 2253:70.149.114.205 2243: 2242: 2221:68.223.200.207 2210: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2132: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2100: 2097: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1958: 1957: 1923: 1920: 1887: 1886: 1877: 1867: 1866: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1841: 1839:# '''Oppose''' 1838: 1835: 1832: 1825: 1822: 1796: 1795:Requested move 1793: 1792: 1786:12.127.178.158 1781: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1740: 1737: 1721: 1718: 1685: 1682: 1676: 1675:ENTRANCE STAGE 1673: 1661: 1658: 1644:207.255.128.79 1607: 1604: 1592: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1490: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1421: 1420: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1378: 1366: 1350:per above. -- 1345: 1333: 1321: 1314:is viewed. -- 1303: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1260: 1258:# '''Oppose''' 1257: 1254: 1251: 1244: 1241: 1207: 1206: 1194: 1192: 1189: 1187: 1186: 1175: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1151: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1119: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1088: 1086:# '''Oppose''' 1085: 1082: 1079: 1072: 1069: 1043: 1042:Requested move 1040: 1021: 1020: 1008: 1007: 1006: 985: 984: 949: 948: 920: 919: 918: 917: 884: 881: 869: 866: 863: 862: 851: 848: 837: 836:Current Event? 834: 833: 832: 817: 814: 813: 812: 800: 797: 796: 795: 783: 780: 778: 776: 775: 733:Wrestling Show 700: 697: 686: 683: 681: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 638: 637: 636: 635: 605: 602: 590: 587: 570: 567: 548: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 494: 491: 476: 473: 454: 451: 436: 435:Current events 433: 432: 431: 401: 398: 358: 357:Past Wrestlers 355: 354: 353: 344: 328: 325: 289: 288: 287: 286: 280: 279: 270: 269: 250: 249: 233: 232: 224: 223: 174: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 166: 165: 147: 113: 110: 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2326: 2313: 2310: 2308: 2305: 2302: 2298: 2297: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2280: 2275: 2268: 2267: 2264: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2241: 2238: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2208: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2188: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2179: 2177: 2171: 2166: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2130: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2116: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2106: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2073: 2068: 2061: 2056: 2055: 2047: 2037: 2034: 2032: 2027: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2006: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1975: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1956: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1943: 1942: 1934: 1933: 1930: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1914: 1909: 1896: 1895: 1892: 1885: 1882: 1878: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1847: 1843: 1837: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1821: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1804:WWE SmackDown 1801: 1794: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1779: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753:William147204 1750: 1739:King Leonidas 1738: 1736: 1735: 1732: 1726: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1690: 1683: 1681: 1674: 1672: 1671: 1668: 1659: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619:24.86.145.131 1616: 1605: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1588: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1547: 1543: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1530: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1508:William147204 1505: 1494: 1489: 1486: 1480: 1472: 1469: 1468:Croctotheface 1465: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1447:Croctotheface 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1427: 1426:Croctotheface 1419: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1355: 1349: 1348:Strong Oppose 1346: 1344: 1341: 1337: 1336:Strong Oppose 1334: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1293:Croctotheface 1290: 1286: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1264: 1256: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1240: 1239: 1236: 1235: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1205: 1202: 1196: 1195: 1190: 1185: 1182: 1176: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1114:Croctotheface 1110: 1106: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1084: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1068: 1067: 1064: 1063:Croctotheface 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1041: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1019: 1016: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1002: 1001:Croctotheface 997: 996: 995: 994: 991: 983: 980: 979:Croctotheface 976: 972: 971: 970: 969: 966: 964: 959: 957: 947: 944: 942: 937: 935: 929: 928: 927: 926: 916: 913: 911: 906: 900: 897:...*sigh*... 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 882: 880: 879: 876: 867: 860: 856: 855: 849: 847: 846: 843: 835: 831: 828: 824: 823: 822: 815: 811: 808: 807:D2001dstanley 803: 802: 798: 794: 791: 790:D2001dstanley 786: 785: 781: 779: 774: 771: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 740: 738: 734: 729: 726: 725: 718: 716: 711: 708: 704: 698: 696: 695: 692: 691:71.201.59.253 684: 682: 679: 678: 675: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 652: 649: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 634: 631: 627: 626: 625: 622: 617: 616: 615: 614: 611: 603: 601: 600: 597: 588: 586: 585: 582: 577: 576: 568: 566: 565: 562: 559: 555: 546: 537: 532: 531: 529: 525: 521: 520: 519: 516: 512: 508: 507: 506: 504: 500: 492: 490: 487: 486: 483: 474: 472: 471: 468: 465: 461: 452: 450: 449: 446: 443: 434: 430: 427: 422: 410: 409: 408: 405: 399: 397: 395: 390: 378: 373: 371: 369: 365: 356: 352: 349: 345: 342: 338: 337: 336: 334: 326: 324: 322: 317: 304: 302: 298: 294: 284: 283: 282: 281: 277: 272: 271: 267: 263: 259: 257:. Stay civil. 256: 252: 251: 247: 242: 241: 240: 238: 230: 226: 225: 221: 216: 215: 214: 212: 208: 203: 201: 197: 192: 191: 187: 182: 180: 172: 163: 158: 157: 155: 152: 148: 145: 142: 137: 136: 134: 130: 126: 125: 124: 122: 119: 111: 109: 107: 102: 100: 94: 92: 87: 86: 80:Headline text 79: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2300: 2283: 2277: 2244: 2212: 2160: 2137: 2136: 2134: 2119: 2114: 2102: 2088: 2084: 2063: 2057: 2051: 2030: 2025: 1978: 1973: 1959: 1952:Darrenhusted 1938: 1935: 1925: 1897: 1888: 1881:Darrenhusted 1863: 1829: 1798: 1783: 1742: 1727: 1723: 1709: 1700: 1691: 1687: 1678: 1663: 1633: 1609: 1594: 1586: 1551: 1525: 1498: 1484: 1481: 1422: 1417: 1392:Kris Classic 1380: 1368: 1358: 1353: 1347: 1335: 1323: 1307: 1276: 1248: 1231: 1210: 1208: 1200: 1197: 1180: 1177: 1172: 1153: 1141: 1121: 1100: 1076: 1045: 1024: 1022: 1014: 1011: 986: 962: 955: 950: 940: 933: 921: 909: 904: 886: 875:70.111.50.30 871: 839: 819: 777: 741: 736: 732: 730: 722: 719: 714: 712: 709: 705: 702: 688: 685:Michael Cole 680: 672: 607: 592: 578: 572: 550: 523: 510: 498: 496: 488: 478: 456: 438: 406: 403: 374: 363: 360: 330: 305: 290: 245: 234: 206: 204: 199: 195: 193: 189: 185: 183: 178: 176: 115: 112:Fan opinions 103: 95: 88: 84: 83: 60: 43: 37: 2276:This is an 2247:—Preceding 2215:—Preceding 2213:is it on? 2091:Gavyn Sykes 1922:Logo change 1747:—Preceding 1694:user:sub619 1638:—Preceding 1613:—Preceding 1555:—Preceding 1386:—Preceding 1316:EazieCheeze 1158:DS9 Voyager 1025:Do not move 770:EazieCheeze 745:—Preceding 648:Sandtrooper 513:section. -- 36:This is an 2164:The Hybrid 2062:. Cheers, 1858:Discussion 1712:The Hybrid 1412:Discussion 1263:not a vote 1167:Discussion 1127:Belevsquad 990:Belevsquad 297:Smackdown! 207:SmackDown! 202:wrestler. 200:SmackDown! 190:SmackDown! 186:SmackDown! 179:SmackDown! 2312:Archive 3 2307:Archive 2 2301:Archive 1 2002:David7581 1929:David7581 1872:David7581 1684:Champions 1606:Time Slot 1539:Anakinjmt 1215:Patstuart 1029:Wknight94 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 2249:unsigned 2237:TJ Spyke 2217:unsigned 2196:Raderick 2187:TJ Spyke 1816:Socks 01 1771:TJ Spyke 1761:contribs 1749:unsigned 1652:contribs 1640:unsigned 1627:contribs 1615:unsigned 1579:TJ Spyke 1569:contribs 1557:unsigned 1516:contribs 1504:unsigned 1400:contribs 1388:unsigned 1340:TJ Spyke 1328:Milchama 1277:Support. 1233:Aaru Bui 1146:TJ Spyke 759:contribs 747:unsigned 630:TJ Spyke 610:sonicKAI 581:Wee bull 558:Jtalledo 464:Jtalledo 442:Jtalledo 368:LBMixPro 348:Tim Long 341:Chrysaor 301:Scorpion 293:Velocity 239:6/20/05 237:Scorpion 229:Chrysaor 213:6/19/05 211:Scorpion 196:Velocity 162:Chrysaor 151:Jtalledo 141:Jtalledo 118:Jtalledo 2279:archive 2054:seth103 1285:WWE Raw 1280:WWE.com 1211:no move 1122:Support 1105:WWE Raw 1101:Support 816:B Brand 674:s0cks01 528:kelvSYC 515:Oakster 503:kelvSYC 482:Antoshi 39:archive 2115:bullet 2060:WP:NOR 2026:bullet 1974:bullet 1891:Bizub4 1824:Survey 1812:MoS:TM 1561:Jay316 1529:Bencey 1464:MoS:TM 1381:Oppose 1369:Oppose 1354:bullet 1324:Oppose 1312:Yahoo! 1308:Oppose 1243:Survey 1227:MoS:TM 1154:Oppose 1142:Oppose 1109:MoS:TM 1107:. As 1071:Survey 1059:MoS:TM 975:MoS:TM 963:Duggan 941:Duggan 925:mCy919 905:bullet 890:mCy919 827:Hybrid 561:(talk) 534:e.g. " 467:(talk) 445:(talk) 333:Chad1m 262:Gwalla 154:(talk) 144:(talk) 121:(talk) 2120:proof 2031:proof 1979:proof 1940:Sub! 1830:Add 1731:Dave. 1703:Dave. 1701:No.-- 1456:Dave. 1437:Dave. 1373:Dave. 1359:proof 1249:Add 1077:Add 956:James 934:James 910:proof 899:WATCH 596:Jman5 575:J. C. 131:. -- 16:< 2257:talk 2225:talk 2131:Live 2058:See 1836:or 1757:talk 1710:No. 1692:YES 1665:not. 1648:talk 1623:talk 1565:talk 1512:talk 1396:talk 1287:and 1255:or 1083:or 1033:talk 1027:. — 755:talk 724:most 295:and 266:Talk 2142:nni 2076:rid 2071:Hyb 2066:The 2048:WCW 1970:-- 1808:WWE 1055:WWE 901:-- 739:". 276:HBK 220:HBK 133:HBK 106:CMC 99:HBK 91:411 2259:) 2227:) 2148:rs 2146:wa 2144:te 2140:Mo 2000:-- 1927:-- 1806:— 1802:→ 1763:) 1759:• 1729:-- 1654:) 1650:• 1629:) 1625:• 1571:) 1567:• 1518:) 1514:• 1435:-- 1402:) 1398:• 1221:→ 1213:. 1061:. 1053:— 1049:→ 1035:) 861:. 768:-- 761:) 757:• 440:-- 306:— 303:. 264:| 260:— 246:is 97:-- 2290:. 2255:( 2223:( 2175:C 2172:/ 2169:T 1912:ε 1907:e 1904:o 1901:M 1755:( 1646:( 1621:( 1563:( 1522:. 1510:( 1394:( 1031:( 753:( 425:ε 420:e 417:o 414:M 393:ε 388:e 385:o 382:M 320:ε 315:e 312:o 309:M 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index