Talk:World Health Organization/Archive 1

3023:

believe that pre-symptomatic patients can spread the disease, but have not found tracing of asymptomatic transmission (Reuters, 2020). The W.H.O was tremendously criticized for conveying this information to the public because there is not enough evidence to confidently support or refute it (“Corona Virus Live”, 2020). The World Health Organization responded to various criticisms by making a new statement explaining that their information was only based on a few studies and expressing the importance of preventative measures like face masks and social distancing (“Corona Virus Live”, 2020). The World Health Organization also held a question and answer session to explain what is known and unknown about asymptomatic transmission based off of known data and addressed what asymptomatic means and entails (Joseph, 2020). According to The World Health Organization, asymptomatic is when a patient is infected but has no symptoms (Joseph, 2020). Pre-symptomatic is the period before the onset of symptoms when someone is infected, so they start out as asymptomatic and then later develop symptoms (Joseph, 2020). However, scientists claim that asymptomatic can be confused with paucisymptomatic cases, which appear to show no symptoms but is actually a very mild form of the disease (Howard, 2020). Scientists and experts have not come to all agreed on a concrete decision on whether asymptomatic patients can transmit COVID-19 or not because the virus has only been around for less than a year (Press, 2020). There are various claims that both support and refute transmissions from asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, and paucisymptomatic patients (Press, 2020). This can be harmful because conflicting evidence communicated from various experts on their point of view for this decision can confuse the public and make them less likely to follow preventative measures (Press, 2020). Thus, The World Health Organization refuted their claim due to the lack of concrete evidence and conflicting data that could lead to less preventative measures and worsen the pandemic.

1758:

number-mismatch-error I suspise that maybe the whole text is not correct: "UN Member States (..error..) appoint delegations to the World Health Assembly, WHO's supreme decision-making body". Someone to check all this? I will try to correct the members-error, but for the structural architecture of WHO I don't know anything... Why is Liechtenstein not participating? Are all WHO members sending delegations - including assosiated Cook Isands and Niue (as I have written) or only the regular state members? If all are sending delegations - what is the difference between regular and assosiated member? Why only New Zealand's self-governing territories are "independent" WHO members, but not similar territories of other states?

4367:.. One section out of twenty + sections by no means makes the article "dedicated to negative criticism". There is more than enough criticism about this entity to warrant one such section. There are other significant criticisms not even mentioned here, starting with their position on abortion as a form of health care, when virtually all abortions are performed on those who simply don't want their baby. Referring to it as a needed form of "health care", on a global scale no less, is misleading to say the least and makes them a partisan organization. Abortion is not even mentioned once in this article. To be fair, the WHO considers 3750:. The page was updated in the last time on 22 of April 2020. According to the page, almost all recent pandemic are linked to disturbed ecosystems and climate change can affect the spread of the pandemic indirectly (for example by increasing water scarcity), but there is not any evidence about a direct link between climate change and the emergence of the pandemic. In January 2021 a research linking climate change to the emergence of the pandemic was published in the journal "Science of total environment. It was cited by at least 21 other studies, but the organization did not change anything on the page." 1208:). Given the basic level of the information presented, I cannot see another "side of the story" which should receive attention. The criticisms section is already sourced to alternative sources because WHO's own pages wouldn't do a good job of that. Structural and procedural (eg. aims and methods) notes are not controversial, however, and therefore this isn't a problem. As to reliability, this fundamentally means doubting that the WHO's website is incorrect about details of WHO's operation. I think an exception has to be made here, and it isn't a major one. Per 500:. Here Manoj Das says: "In 1984, the WHO asked India's director-general of health services to discuss the possibility of a hidden fourth dimension of the human, from the physical and mental health point of view, in a workshop consisting of some of India's leading physicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, neuro-scientists and students of mysticism, at NIMHANS, Bangalore. The brainstorming sessions concluded that it was time for medical and psychological healthcare disciplines to take note of Factor X, the unpronounced potency, the foundation of our life.2 2822: 2003: 31: 308:. Firstly, it is an opinion piece from someone who is not an expert on the WHO, the health report or even health policy. Secondly, the amount of space given to it matches the actual description of the report. I am removing this section. If a section wants to be included about criticism, it should have genuine secondary sources that describe the world health report being criticised for x and y. Not chunks of quotation from opinion pieces. 4300:— The issue, here, is really about criticism in general, and while there's a dedicated article for COVID, this doesn't mean we can't summarize accounts of criticism, in an objective manner, in this article, with a link to the dedicated article, which is the common practice.. Aside from mention of criticism as concerns COVID, this article overall comes off like a promotional piece and is begging for a neutrality tag. -- 3099: 2987: 2774: 2425: 2291: 2202: 1952: 1851: 1667: 877: 957:) 14:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC) A few notes: Several references lack date of publication. Based too much on information from WHO itself. Too big for my taste, but this is personal tase, not necessarily according to GA criteria. Membership section: Pleasant to read but mentions a few small countries - why these and not others? Overall a good article which can be better. -- 646:

Monde Diplomatique I worked out this short review on the original agreement which is causing the criticism that possibilities of world-wide health education regarding any nuclear technologies is limited effectively. Secondary ressources like this newspaper itself were not accepted even with the literature ressources which are used within this articles!--

2160: 2119: 3154: 2743: 2260: 1713: 3060: 2354: 2894:. A better idea might be to rewrite this article somewhat, incorporating the information about controversies into a broader description of WHO activities and history, so that a "Controversies" section isn't needed. Some of the more flash-in-the-pan controversies like "Intermittent preventive therapy" could possibly just be removed. — 168:

are quite heart-rending and devastating abortion practices, that put the mother at risk. WHO people are doctors, they have to save lives, and more importantly here, prevent the majority of people from dying. If that means informing people on the availability of safe abortions, that just seems logical, and not particularly pro-choice.

3827:

include N-nitroso compounds." What this means, in plain English, is that nitrites make bacon more carcinogenic. But instead of spelling this out, the WHO moves swiftly on to the question of how both red and processed meats might cause cancer, after adding that "it is not yet fully understood how cancer risk is increased".

3974:, as a way to try to get countries to share virus data with one another and combat future outbreaks. This founding and implementation of the BioHub program could maybe be included in the "Operational history of WHO" subsection of the "History" section of this article for the year of "2021". Article reference: 3034:

index.html. Accessed 16 June 2020. Joseph, A. (2020, June 9).Â WHO clarifies comments on asymptomatic spread of Covid-19. STAT. https:// www.statnews.com/2020/06/09/who-comments-asymptomatic-spread-covid-19/. Accessed 15 June 2020. Press, T. A. (2020, June 9). Confusion Reigns as UN Scrambles Mask,

1454:

Not really. This is not the case for homeopathy, several forms of electrotherapy along with others others. Quite a few don't really have a concept of health as such. Perhaps what you are referring to is "holistic medicine". Whether WHO's definition of health agrees with that of some areas of alt med

1430:

Even that man is ignorant where the nest is, i.e. in the international organisations in Vienna which answer to WHO. I got a little tired of seeing people barking up wrong trees. The right tree would be the UN Assembly passing a resolution to direct the WHO, to direct their sub-organisations to effect

1221:

On the point of structure I was left with a difficult task. If you take the information presented in bullet points and put it in prose you get a long paragraph that is difficult to navigate. The article doesn't have the space to elaborate on each of the tasks, so a prose portion is likely to look the

645:

Maybe someone is willing and interested to have a look on the German contribution for explaining WHO criticism and to translate it to English. I am not the one. My thesaurus of legal termini is quite small. After reading the article about the relations between the IAEO and the WHO in the newspaper Le

245:

Daphne Fresle, a former top official in the WHO office that monitors worldwide pharmaceutical use, resigned in protest in 2002, complaining of the agency's relationships with drug makers. She said WHO higher-ups routinely censored internal disagreements among staff members over drug-company influence

196:

167:

The WHO, being a multi-lateral organization, must uphold health and healthcare standards that suit the needs of the majority of the people within its member states. It happens to be that the cause of pro-lifers is pretty well represented in the world; so much so, that often, in many countries, there

3231:

It currently reads: "On 7 July 2020, President Trump formally notified the UN of his intent to withdraw the United States from the WHO. However, President Joe Biden announced plans to rejoin, and signed an executive order to that effect after his inauguration." Plans to rejoin would mean it actually

3018:

I would like to add the following under the heading ‘controversies’ and subheading ‘2019-20 COVID-19 pandemic’. It elaborates on The World Health Organizations science communication during the COVID-19 pandemic and addresses some concerns with there not yet being enough evidence for The World Health

1125:

I've reworded that section. As regards the "potentially dated statements", it's a voluntary tagging of statements which will become incorrect – clearly this ought to be most of any article on a current organisation, so it's just choice ones. I couldn't find any newer figures than 2002, but they give

704:

Dear 211.27.74.147, your text on the WHO/IAEA is biased and contains your personal opinions ('erroneously'), which nobody really required. In particular, it did not clarify why the controversy arose as you usefully forgot to quote the key paragraph 3 of article 1. Hopefully, my text will do a better

4316:

This article currently discusses criticism about various topics (including the status of Taiwan, affiliation with Robert Mugabe, and the role of the regional offices, among others) in the sections where they're relevant. We shouldn't create a dedicated "criticism" section, for the reasons described

1616:

I've moved the translations of the name from the top of the infobox to a new section, as the mass of black text seemed to me to be getting out of hand. There are several thousand languages and they wouldn't all fit where they were. Also the infobox has been shifted to below the lead, to cut down on

1217:

Only the final part is even questionable of that test, and here about half the article is based on sources from WHO itself and suitable areas are demarcated (as above) where such sources would not be acceptable. If you doubt the World Health Organization's published information about itself, then I

1214:

Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the requirement in the case of self-published sources that they be published experts in the field, so long as: the material is not unduly

4192:

with Great Leader. Let's not try to confuse criticism with theories. There is much criticism about the preoccupation of the WHO with abortion, as if abortion has anything to do with the health of the world. Abortion is not even metnioned here. There's also much criticism about their handling of

4112:

In most cases they shouldn't be. "Criticism" sections tend to lead to NPOV problems and interfere with logical organization of an article. It's better to organize information by topic like this article does, with criticism mentioned where relevant, instead of rearranging negative material into its

1153:

I have a hard time seeing this as a serious nomination. Just a quick glance reveals giant issues with the article: formatting is horrible, with content presented more in list-form than in proper prose, referencing depending almost exclusively on a single source, which is the organization itself. I

671:

There is a permanent protest in front of the WHO headquarters for the last 2 years, so it is a minor issue. There are numerous reports that the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster are not properly addressed by WHO, although these reports are obviously not from the establishment. Many references

3826:

On the WHO website, the harmfulness of nitrite-treated meats is explained so opaquely you could miss it altogether. In the middle of a paragraph on "what makes red meat and processed meat increase the risk of cancer", it says: "For instance, carcinogenic chemicals that form during meat processing

3022:

The World Health Organization was also criticized during the pandemic for communicating conflicting information. An expert from The World Health organization made a statement claiming that the transmission of COVID-19 by someone who did not have symptoms was rare (“Corona Virus Live”, 2020). They

2954:

of WHO are a controversy, a systematic description of what are those expenses and why they are considered controversial. Providing one single case of someone staying in an expensive hotel without any critical appraisal of that situation seems highly biased and inappropriate for Knowledge. Please

1781:

I don't think that half the budget of the WHO comes from Lucifer Trust. From what I understand the majority of the funding for WHO comes from its members countries - I don't think WHO receives much money at all directly from foundation and industry (or from individuals - though they do offer the

1757:

current revision of the page states that UN member states as of 2004 are 192, but that is wrong. They are 191. 192 are the WHO members, but not all of them are UN member states, and also not all UN member states are members of the WHO. Look at the link that I added at the bottom. Becouse of that

629:

This section is poorly sourced (references are to campaign movies, websites, and blogs) and does not assert notability, and is decidedly one-sided. It is also disproportionately large considering the rest of the article. I think this section is of quite minor relevance to the article and the WHO

252:

The article inaccurately and misleadingly says the WHO gets most of its funding from private sources, and by implication from drug companies. It does not. Since assessed contributions (dues) have long been frozen, voluntary contributions now provide over half of the WHO's funding, primarily from

1363:

to continue the review on my talk page. Unfortunately at this stage I will say it is a fail, but I will allow some time for other commentators on this page to respond. It is an artcile I would be personally interested in getting to GA standard so if you wish I may be able to contribute or offer

1512:

Your article states that WHO was established on 4/7/1948 when it was ratified by the 26th member state. The article in the New York Times, 2/8/1948, p. 44, says that WHO came into existence on 2/7/28, after the 29th UN country ratified its charter. These statements seem to conflict with one

445:

I removed an expert tag that was inserted along with a claim that the WHO's policy on not hiring smokers is discriminatory as it was obvious POV. I did not remove the content. I am uncertain what expert help was being looked for and I do not know that this should continue to be listed under

1785:

Also the public-private partnerships listed on this page work "with" the WHO but in most cases receive no financial support from WHO. Many are independent foundations - with no official links to the WHO. I think that the paragraph on partnerships is very misleading. It makes it look like the

2957:

2) If it is actually even worth mentioning in Knowledge, then the section on Robert Mugabe's role as a goodwill ambassador should likely be removed and this information could be just one of many other entries under the heading Mistakes or Diplomatic Faux Pas, or whatever it would be called.

2037:

for Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Germany, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland declared they fully support the World Health

1426:

Why am I writing this? I have become somewhat tired of marijuana legislation advocacy which turns to national or State politicians. Today, in the 2012 presidential election campaign GOP candidate Romney replied to a question of medical marijuana that it was a State issue.

1789:

I notice that this same information is repeated on the Public-Private Parterships page. I don't know enough yet about Knowledge to suggest how to fix this - but a good source of some additional information on public-private partnerships related to health can be found at

1470:

is currently in arbitration over such edits, so I suggest keeping them until that process is completed rather than indulge in an edit war. The article currently stands as a testament to the unbalancing influence of the aformentioned user. Actually, I'll add a boiler.

1215:

self-serving and exceptional in nature; it does not involve claims about third parties; it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source; there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; the article is not based primarily on such sources.

993:

There are several unaddressed cleanup tags on this article: Knowledge articles needing clarification (March 2012), Articles containing potentially dated statements (2002, 2009, 2010, 2012) I have asked the reviewer whether they plan to complete the review.

4435:

I'm okay with a "Performance assessment" section. That said, the WHO's activities are so complex and varied, I still think it may be more useful to put assessments of each aspect of the organization in the section about that aspect. 15:39, 10 February 2024

3329:

Why is there no mention of Trump trying to cancel the WHO, defund it and blame it for complicity in the "China virus" (as he calls it)? Has this article been censored? Seems to happen a lot on Knowledge. Especially when the "alt-Right" are involved.

235:

The WHO solicits tens of millions of dollars yearly from companies whose fortunes it directly affects. In fact, the international agency now takes in more private money — more than $ 500 million a year — than it gets in dues from its 192 member

2921:, it's both the controversies article *and* sections that are discouraged ! I think however the current state isn't handling that too badly by moving much of that material to sub-articles which treat each subject as an event as recommended by 1431:.... whatever change they want, if they want change. This perennial debate (since before President Carter) gets on my nerves for one and not grasping where the power structures and levers are is just so ignorant that I felt the need to write. 1340:

That brings me to another point, there should be sections on its projects (not just a list under current projects). That would allow the controversies to be presented along with each project. A much better way of structuring the article in my

1201:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable: (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable

3590:

This incident seems too minor to merit mention in this article. It is a minor blip in the 70+ year history of the World Health Organization. Also, we shouldn't have a section titled "Scandals and protests" for the reasons described at

842:

On the other hand, WHO is very influential in terms of rich countries giving aid to poor countries. Its pronouncements carry weight, simply because people listen to them. We might describe how its reputation developed. For example in

834:

a world government or function as one; or that it already is doing so. That POV is opposed by those who see it as doing some valuable work in coordinating national initiatives, but who don't recognize it is authoritative in any way.

3665:

is an essay and therefore just one or more person's opinions, rather than a policy. I do actually agree it is sensible to have a criticisms section, I just don't think that some people objection to the choice of leader is notable.

2852:

I'm noticing that the "Controversies" section is getting large on this article, which itself is over 100k bytes in size. Does any editor have any immediate objections to a new article (created via a copy-paste with attribution) at

1642:

I think we should have a section on the WHO 'Global Health Ethics' office, which is currently headed (Coordinated) by Dr. Abha Saxena. Alternatively, an article on Dr. Saxena would be useful and helpful to the Knowledge project.

4419:, where this idea can be covered as it applies to the acclaim or criticism the WHO has received.regarding issues like abortion, human rights, FGM and so forth, rather than having this overall idea buried in the body of text.. -- 3569:

Yes, I don't know if "content dispute" has some sort of technical meaning, but yes I agree that we are both disagreeing on content. I consider this to be a normal thing here, we disagree, we discuss, we try to reach consensus.

1546:

It would improve the language of this article if United Nations were properly referred to by using its name as just that, a name. That is to say one should refer to UN as simply 'United Nations', and avoid referring to it as

2452:

I propose to revise the first para of the "Opposition by the United States" section as follows. I added footnotes explaining my thinking for the various highlighted edits. Obviously those should not be added to the article.

838:

Let's find a way to avoid exalting either of these viewpoints in the article. Either mention both, or ignore both. Considering that the 1st POV is not mentioned anywhere but the lede, I've opted for ignoring both - for now.

2566:

This clarifies that nothing has actually been halted yet. Could still be halted though. I came to this section to see whether the Trump Administration had followed through on this threat, and the article didn't answer my

3554:

criticism <, but removing the entire edit which is reliably sourced will lead to content disputes, i intend to add further criticsm of this organization, for which there's plenty, enough to warrant it's own section.

4505:

The text you quote is accurate but confusing. The government of Taiwan formally calls itself the "Republic of China", whereas the (post-1949) government of China formally calls itself the "People's Republic of China".

285:

The beginning sector of this page is in need of 'repairs'. The image doesn't show, the disambiguation link doesn't work and a lot of other sectors don't show. I'm no expert so a little bit of volunteering would help.

1336:

I have some reservations about the controversies having their own section. Sure there are controversies associated with the WHO and they should be mentioned, but they would be much better incorporated into the other

2038:

Organization in leading the global public health response to the COVID 19 pandemic and "commit, on a voluntary basis, to provide resources in support of the WHO’s COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan".

3622:

As explained in the edit summary and here, there's enough WHO related critism to warrant it's own section also outside of Covid-19. You can expand it, but well sourced remove critism will lead to content disputes.

2032:

The paragraph wrongly ends with a comma instead of a period. I find undue weight is given to US internal politics with two sentences about Republican support for Trump. It's just one of 194 member states. The

746:

I did some editing with more references + inline citations, including moving some unsubstantiated claims to the "controversies" section and clearly pointing out some places where references were still needed.

4388:

If there are reliable sources discussing the WHO's work related to abortion and/or FGM, I have no objection to adding those to the article, in whichever sections they're relevant to. I suggest you read

1264:

and even without going into the references in depth it needs a lot of work. It doesn't really flow and lacks important information that would allow an average reader to follow it. Some specifics below:

1269:

Needs some introduction to the League of Nations Health Organization. It currently redirects back to this article, but even if it had its own article it should still have a bit of an introduction here.

4266: 3532:

reverting your edit. I don't think people objecting the appointment of the leader is a "scandal". It's just disagreement, and disagreement with multinational organizations is normal, not scandalous.

3708:

You can change the leader, but remove the critism all together is an issue. Yes plenty of articles have controversies and critism sections, and there is enough reliable sources criticizing the WHO.

4037: 1883: 3273:

Would it be beneficial to include a section about public perception and views on the WHO? I don't see a specific section or page for it, but there certainly seems to be a lot of opinions on it.

4451:

I know the China-Taiwan situation is sensitive and a constant topic of debate in Knowledge, but why does this article stand on its own in referring to China (PRC) as governing Taiwan (ROC)? The

1229:

If you could please drop the tone we can have a proper discussion about what might be the best way of improving the article, if necessary. I am well aware of the criteria and their application.

4415:

Yes, I read the material and I believe I quoted the most appropriate passage and addressed any concern about too much focus on criticism. Perhaps it would be best to name a proposed section as

1882:

Change "The Republic of China (Taiwan) however is currently no member of the WHO" to "The Republic of China (Taiwan) however is currently not a member of the WHO" under the Membership section.

2243: 2322:

Apart from the Director General (Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus), all other heads of WHO (deputy director generals) have changed designations or have moved out. Current list of leadership :

3310:" (plural), with a very weak source to establish that; then only one (singular) institution is itemized. Shouldn't this information just get plowed into another section as one sentence? 882: 555:, there should only be the official names given in the working languages of the UN (English, Chinese, Russian, etc.) and I barely consider Italian and Korean to be UN working languages. -- 2068:

It’s Not Just the WHO: How China Is Moving on the Whole U.N.; Despite his saber-rattling, Trump’s pullback actually helps Beijing in its new, inside-baseball strategy to build influence.

1423:

are the three WHO sub-organisations in Vienna monitoring/supervising drug and narcotics legislation in all or most countries. Haven't got the list handy, but you'll probably find them.

260:

The Dec 23, 2001, six-page resignation letter by Daphne Fresle, a member of the WHO essential drugs and medicines policy group, was described in more detail in a May 4, 2002 article by

686:

The claim that the WHO was gagged by the IAEA is obviously made by people who haven't actually read the agreement or any of the other agreements the WHO made, I've fixed that section.

3039:

confusion.html?searchResultPosition=1. Accessed 16 June 2020. Reuters. (2020, June 3). Explainer: Are Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patients Safe or Silent Carriers? The New York Times.

1819:

What was that event? There was someone who had a disease and recovered sane. He brought his story to, I don't know who, but those people acknowledged his story and founded the WHO.

3842: 3392:

in D. R. Congo during 2018 and 2020. Many of them did not how to report it 29 women became pregnant and were forced by the perpetrators to have abortions. WHO director-general

2171: 2130: 4221:

How the 'bureaucratic' World Health Organization ended up on the hot seat over its COVID response U.S. announces it's withdrawing from WHO, citing undue influence from China

2749:

Looks good, I didn't change the second highlight though (kept 'its' instead of 'the WHO's) as I think it's clear enough and it's better to avoid repeating 'the WHO' too much.

2587: 217:

In the 1980s, the agency turned its attention to noncommunicable diseases. But its ability to do meaningful work was limited by a budget that had been frozen at $ 450 million.

1738: 1701: 775:

The internationally recognized sovereign states section lists all 193 widely recognised sovereign states, including all member states of the United Nations, plus Vatican City

3442:

If you think there are more incidents where dozens of WHO staff were raped by their supervisors, I'd absolutely say that should be added too! i.e. I don't agree at all.

2633: 4041: 3687:

Acccording to you, and not the policy as i read it, WHO falls under organizations, the reliable sources are there. This will warrant next steps at dispute resolution.

4533:

You're completely right. I was being overly protective of Taiwan and read the text too quickly. As there was no actual problem, I'll mark this as closed according to

122:

The WHO fits this description. WHO does not have to have pro-choice or anything similar in its name in order to promote or support abortion rights, which it does.

2039: 1226:

makes it clear that there are plenty of situations where a list might be appropriate and given these reasons I felt it was the best way to present the information.

915: 4393:

again, as it discusses both "criticism" articles and "criticism" sections; both tend to lead to NPOV issues and are not usually the best way to organize content. —

4011: 3977: 847:

campaigns, it used to say that DDT shouldn't be sprayed inside huts; then it suddenly changed its position (even though IIRC the science of DDT hadn't changed. --

466:

05:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Not hiring smokers is by very deffinition discriminatory and the downsides should be mentioned but only if given a decent source.

4371:, openly practiced in many third-world countries, as an affront to humanity. Good for them The article would improve if this also was adequately covered, imo-- 887: 4098:

That's absolutely not true. Criticism and/or conspiracy theories sections are often present in many Wiki articles about important organizations, people etc.

1539:'United Nations' is a name, not a description. 'International Business Machines' is another example of a name (as opposed to a description). The expression ' 905: 2233:

Change "The current chairman of the executive board is Dr. Assad Hafeez." to "The current chairman of the executive board is Dr. Hiroki Nakatani." Source:

253:

national and local governments, foundations and NGOs, and other UN organizations, with very little coming from private sources (drug companies and others).

2470:

The United States had paid half of its annual assessed fees to the WHO as of 31 March 2020; it would ordinarily pay its remaining fees in September 2020

1486:

The WHO publishing drafts on homeopathy in a positive light is concerning. It wouldn't be if they investigated "alternative" therapies scientifically.

4225: 3418:

to me. In the WHO's 70+ year history, there have surely been other incidents of this scale, but none of them get their own section in the article. —

3377: 2067: 1223: 830:

The lede had described WHO as having authority and a "mandate", as if someone had put them in charge. This is the POV of those who feel that the UN

1154:

don't think this should have been nominated at all; the improvements needed to get it to GA standard are just way beyond the scope of a GA review.

504:

I've never heard about that until now, and I'd like to read a report on the results of the workshop. Maybe something can be found with the help of

1742: 1705: 1297:

The first meeting World Health Assembly finished on 24 July 1948, having secured a budget of US$ 5 million (then GBP£1,250,000) for the 1949 year.

3040: 2705: 1306:

Its first priorities were malaria, tuberculosis, sexually transmitted infections, maternal and child health, nutrition and environmental hygiene.

1799:

I think this website above is not critical enough of private-public partnerships! Please compare with views held by Health Action International:

1384:

Will fail it in its current state. Feel free to leave me a note on my talk page when you re-nominate it and if I have time I will re-review it.

1020: 4365:

says -- "An article dedicated to negative criticism of a topic, as well as one dedicated to accolades and praises is usually discouraged ..."

4235: 2854: 1285:

The use of the word "world", rather than "international", emphasised the truly global nature of what the organization was seeking to achieve.

631: 3130:

Under membership: "The government of Taiwan was allowed to participate as an observer from 2009–2016, but has not been invited gain since."

1828: 1432: 591: 4265:

Criticism of the WHO's response to COVID-19 is already covered in the relevant section of this article, and in more detail in the article

1466:

are completely out of place here OR that they need to be accompanied by ALL WHO definitions of ALL types of medicine/therapies. However,

1180:) is not even mentioned in the article. It's available for preview on Amazon and Google Books, so there's really no excuse not to use it. 584:

i agree - i think it's really superfluous, and if people don't provide some reason to provide non-UN languages, we should take them out.

3280: 3190: 3026:

Coronavirus Live Updates: Fauci Delivers Grim Assessment, Saying, 'It Isn't Over Yet'. (2020, June 09). Retrieved June 09, 2020, from

2727: 2370: 1928: 1493: 727: 690: 473: 459: 407: 150: 3817: 1887: 3331: 3133:

should be: "The government of Taiwan was allowed to participate as an observer from 2009–2016, but has not been invited again since."

2153: 2112: 1552: 1520: 933: 657: 574: 513: 4466: 3801: 2549: 344:

Montenegro yes; Liechtenstein - it is not on the official members list, so it appears to be a non-member, but I don't know why so...

4517: 4404: 4332: 4280: 4128: 4085: 3652: 3606: 3498: 3429: 3258: 3233: 3216: 2905: 2340: 2247: 2100: 811: 571: 107: 85: 4193:

the COVID crisis. It doesn't matter 'how many' other articles have criticism sections. The question is, is it warranted here? --

1356: 954: 2694:

remove commentary that oversimplifies the issue, see Politifact article. legality now discussed earlier in the sentence I added.

1023:

they are most likely not required of a good article (although it could be a good idea to see if the older ones can be updated).

2828:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a

2167: 2126: 2009:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a

1245: 1142: 1086: 1059: 910: 91: 4458:

I want to change the text in this article to correct this, but I don't want to accidentally start an edit battle with others.

3364:==Abuse of power in Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ebola Response== In 2021, 51 women accused WHO staff (and also staff at 1586:"? Going back to origins, before the founding of the present-day UN organization, "the United Nations" was a synonym for "the 4534: 1560: 1273:

Its efforts were hampered by the Second World War, during which UNRRA also played a role in international health initiatives.

1177: 139: 127: 47: 17: 3373: 3396:

called the situation "inexcusable" and said he would work to reform the organization and hold the perpetrators to account.

2968: 1195:

Firstly that's unnecessarily insulting and should not have been said the way it was. Secondly, it is not borne out by the

1543:

is therefore confused language, like it also would be mistaken to refer to IBM as 'the International Business Machines'.

153:. Input in helping to better define the criteria used for project categorization and/or inclusion would be appreciated. - 3869:"Shifts in global bat diversity suggest a possible role of climate change in the emergence of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2" 2042: 1984: 3487:. This article already includes information about criticism of the WHO, incorporated into several different sections. — 3247:

The US government announced plans to withdraw but did not actually withdraw. I've edited the article to clarify this. —

1333:

Current projects is not a great header. It will constatntly need to be updated and runs a real risk of being incorrect.

3950:

Hard no. Obviously. This is an encyclopaedia. What this page does not need is people introducing conspiracy theories.

3036: 2234: 1571: 3030:

Howard, J. (2020, June 9). Coronavirus spread by asymptomatic people 'appears to be rare,' WHO official says. CNN.

1279:

In February 1946, the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations helped draft the constitution of the new body

2622:

cut unnecessary detail for broad article on WHO, removed ref of their announcement re the disease -- not needed here

3713: 3692: 3628: 3560: 3518: 3381: 3232:

left, but the article only mentions an "intention" to leave. Did the USA actually leave, and if so, on what date?

2829: 2613:

accuracy again -- no payment has actually been stopped yet, and there is some debate over whether Trump can do this

2010: 38: 3595:; controversies involving the WHO are already incorporated into other sections of the article as they should be. — 2034: 4155: 4103: 4060: 4019: 3970:

Reuters has written an article about the WHO's new pilot program called BioHub, which was started in 2021 in the

3303: 3296: 3109: 2997: 2784: 2301: 2212: 1962: 1861: 1567: 635: 4070:

In most cases "criticism" sections are not a good way to organize article content, for the reasons described at

3031: 2676:

addition so people can go to the Politifact reference for more nuanced discussion inappropriate for this article

1455:

is not very important for an article about the WHO. It is probably of interest in some alt med articles though.

3471:

Some Covid-related criticism could be culled together from various sections, but I'm not an expert on that. --

2964: 2181: 2140: 1983:

It would be good to put under the controversies topic of COVID-19, what is mentioned here about December 2019:

1906: 1832: 1098:

In 1959, the WHO signed Agreement WHA 12–40 with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which some{who}

770: 532:

In the near future I am planning to add the HWTS to the list of programs and then add an article about it. --

386: 4220: 3041:

https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/06/03/world/asia/03reuters-health-coronavirus-asymptomatic-explainer.html

2872:

Yes, the Covid portion is obviously of great significance for not only the WHO but also the world as a whole.

1436: 595: 4368: 3284: 2496:

permanently terminate all American funding of WHO and end its membership if there were not "improvements" by

1932: 971:

The above is not intended to be the only comment for this review. Others reviewers, feel free to continue. --

694: 3483:

Designated "Criticism" sections are generally not a good idea because they're a magnet for NPOV issues. See

3335: 3194: 3105: 2993: 2877: 2780: 2731: 2431: 2366: 2297: 2208: 1958: 1857: 1673: 1497: 1479:

Remove them. I put them in because MNH seemed to think defintions were nesscary and I was trying to be fair.

1312:

I know the answer to some, if not most of these questions, but they should still be made clear in the text.

731: 661: 517: 477: 456: 411: 290: 3738:

I've removed this recently added content because in my opinion this is not encyclopedic content but rather

3237: 2336: 1578:" - the first word of all these articles is "The". We would say "I'm taking over IBM" but "I'm taking over 4426: 4378: 4307: 4245: 4200: 3997: 2754: 1648: 1587: 1556: 1524: 1467: 929: 4113:

own section. I have not often seen articles with a "Conspiracy theories" section, but that seems like an

3513:

There are plenty of criticism of WHO, i added the Scandals and Protest sections, feel free to expand it.

382: 326: 272: 4544: 4511: 4488: 4398: 4326: 4274: 4122: 4079: 3709: 3688: 3661:

I've seen plenty articles with criticisms sections, and they seemed appropriate to me, I think the link

3646: 3624: 3600: 3556: 3514: 3492: 3423: 3252: 3210: 3167: 2899: 2094: 1728: 1724: 999: 815: 568: 362: 309: 4150:

such articles that fit this category to begin with, thus you "have not ofteen seen" such sections tbh.

3993: 3141: 1768:

I checked the WHO constitution to clarify the WHO/UN membership issue. Hope the current text is clear.

647: 446:

controversies, but left it to others more intimately familiar with the WHO. Cheers and happy editing,

4540: 4500: 4484: 3777: 2550:"Critics say Trump's WHO funding hold violates the Impoundment Control Act. Here's what experts think" 2332: 1991: 4291: 4251: 4186: 4151: 4099: 4056: 4015: 3315: 3276: 3186: 3048: 2810: 2806: 2328: 2239: 1924: 1734: 1697: 1516: 1489: 1447: 1409: 1350: 1204:. It might be you believe that the information presented is not representative of published sources ( 976: 962: 948: 807: 723: 653: 587: 469: 431: 403: 2046: 706: 323: 4548: 4521: 4492: 4430: 4408: 4382: 4336: 4311: 4284: 4255: 4204: 4159: 4132: 4114: 4107: 4089: 4064: 4045: 4023: 4001: 3959: 3943: 3759: 3717: 3696: 3675: 3656: 3632: 3610: 3579: 3564: 3541: 3522: 3502: 3477: 3451: 3433: 3415: 3408: 3385: 3358: 3339: 3319: 3288: 3262: 3241: 3220: 3198: 3172: 3145: 3084: 3052: 3027: 2972: 2934: 2909: 2881: 2866: 2841: 2837: 2814: 2758: 2735: 2409: 2394: 2385:

Unfortunately Peter Salama is no longer head of the WHO as is displayed on Wiki, as he passed away

2374: 2344: 2276: 2251: 2187: 2176: 2146: 2135: 2104: 2083: 2054: 2050: 2021: 1995: 1936: 1910: 1902: 1891: 1836: 1746: 1720: 1652: 1632: 1605: 1528: 1501: 1440: 1413: 1398: 1378: 1250: 1241: 1189: 1163: 1147: 1138: 1118: 1091: 1082: 1064: 1055: 1037: 1003: 980: 966: 856: 819: 797: 755: 747: 735: 714: 710: 698: 681: 665: 639: 616: 599: 578: 541: 521: 481: 435: 415: 390: 365: 348: 339: 329: 312: 275: 172: 162: 143: 78: 3802:

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/who-heartbroken-by-congo-sex-abuse-probe-findings-2021-09-28/

3137: 2486:

Trump critics also said that such a suspension would be illegal, though legal experts speaking to

4390: 4361: 4318: 4071: 3931: 3662: 3638: 3592: 3484: 2922: 2918: 2887: 2873: 2862: 2531: 2362: 1987: 844: 789: 751: 447: 135: 3901: 3742:: "The organization created a special page on its site dedicated to questions and answers about 3641:. Criticism of the WHO is already described in other sections of the article, as it should be. — 2472:. World leaders and health experts largely condemned President Trump's announcement, which came 1901:

rather than the truncated and unwieldy Republic of China (Taiwan) so I’l make both corrections.

1566:

Don't agree. These public bodies take "the" because the final word is an abstract noun, as "the

4055:

There has to be a section about the criticism and the conspiracy theories surrounding the WHO.

3637:

A criticism section is not a good idea, here or in most articles, for the reasons explained at

2948:

to choosing and describing topics. This should be a general rule and below are just 2 examples:

2386: 4420: 4372: 4301: 4239: 4194: 4142:"I have not often seen articles with a "Conspiracy theories" section " I said "articles about 3955: 3939: 3755: 3743: 3671: 3575: 3537: 3447: 3404: 2891: 2750: 2650: 1644: 1626: 1599: 1395: 1375: 1209: 1185: 1174: 1159: 1115: 1034: 852: 537: 493: 336: 265: 4528: 4507: 4477: 4394: 4322: 4295: 4270: 4182: 4138: 4118: 4095: 4075: 3971: 3876: 3682: 3642: 3617: 3596: 3529: 3488: 3419: 3248: 3206: 3162: 2895: 2405: 2090: 1551:. Of course this also applies to 'World Health Organization' (a name, not a description). -- 995: 793: 557: 271:

It was not protesting pharmaceutical companies contributing too much to funding of the WHO.

158: 2805:

trump has already cut funds to the WHO and redirected them to more deserving organizations

381:

The first director general is listed at the top, but the incumbent is listed at the bottom.

3311: 3072: 3044: 2930: 2663: 2490:

said its legality could depend on the particular way in which the suspension was executed.

2323: 2015: 1405: 1346: 1327: 1320: 1275:

Expand UNRRA. I am not sure what this sentence is trying to say. Its efforts at what? What

1205: 972: 958: 944: 427: 305: 208: 3868: 2079: 1803: 1404:

I agree that at its current state it does not satisfy the criteria of a good article. --

1291:

The constitution of the World Health Organization had been signed by all 61 countries...

4470: 4033:

The WHO maintains the VigiAccess database, which is searchable and open to the public:

3778:"EXCLUSIVE-More than 50 women accuse aid workers of sexual abuse in Congo Ebola crisis" 3747: 3393: 3351: 3080: 3068: 2833: 2390: 2272: 1575: 1472: 1237: 1196: 1134: 1078: 1051: 1013: 677: 552: 2858: 1583: 287: 169: 131: 3880: 3951: 3935: 3751: 3739: 3703: 3667: 3571: 3548: 3533: 3465: 3443: 3400: 3389: 3037:

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/06/09/world/europe/ap-eu-virus-outbreak-mask-

2458: 2235:

https://apps.who.int/gb/gov/en/chairman-and-officers-of-the-executive-board_en.html

1618: 1591: 1385: 1365: 1323:, but because they are too close to the source. The objectives are a copy paste of 1181: 1155: 1105: 1024: 848: 720:

During the 1980s wasn't Homosexuality a disease as far as the WHO were concerned?

533: 301: 254: 75: 1793: 551:

Do we really need all these names in foreign languages within the namebox? As per

1213: 1200: 256: 2401: 1761: 1043:

Right, sorry – I didn't notice this review had been undertaken. I'll get to it.

345: 203:

This section was presumably based on an inaccurate and misleading June 26, 2005

154: 123: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4462: 4455:

page refers to Taiwan as a country and makes no mention of China governing it.

1070:

Could anyone point out where clarification is requested? I can't find the tag.

3813: 3472: 2926: 2706:"Trump threatens to permanently cut off WHO funding, withdraw U.S. membership" 2634:"'We Alerted The World' To Coronavirus On Jan. 5, WHO Says In Response To U.S" 2553: 2487: 2468:

role in "severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus."

1769: 1324: 611: 115: 4236:

REUTERS: WHO's Tedros disappointed by end of U.S. abortion ruling Roe v Wade

3032:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/health/coronavirus-asymptomatic-spread-who-bn/

2925:, instead of including them directly inside a massive controversies section. 3346: 3345:

It's clearly outlined in the article. Do you need assistance in finding it?

3076: 2532:"Coronavirus Updates: Trump Halts U.S. Funding of World Health Organization" 2512:

more accurate description of what has happened so far per Politifact article

2268: 2075: 1480: 1287:

How does world rather than international emphasise the truely global nature?

673: 497: 1446:

This is essentially the same definition of health used by most branches of

1345:

It is an important encyclopaedic topic and I commend you for taking it on.

936:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 268: 4230: 3468:

has criticized the WHO for downplaying the risk of nitrite-treated meats.

2955:

consider removing that section or editing it based on systematic research.

2588:"WHO regrets Trump funding halt as global coronavirus cases top 2 million" 1326:. Of couse if you don't take it from the source it runs the risk of being 99: 2159: 2118: 767:

Members of the WHO are 191 of the UN members, the Cook Islands and Niue.

4483:

This is my first time using the Talk page. Apologies for any blunders.

2960:

Systematic research of the topic should be a general rule in Knowledge.

2592: 2482:

defended its actions in alerting the world to the emergence of COVID-19

2041:(By the way as I saw there was no article for this alliance I set up a 505: 3306:

section feels awkward. It announces that there are "other institution

788:

It's not my cup of tea but I think that looks like a problem to me...

4474: 4452: 4231:

BBC: Covid: Serious failures in WHO and global response, report finds

3365: 1898: 3978:"Inside the super-secure Swiss lab trying to stop the next pandemic" 1694:

Change home page links in external links from http to https, thanks

2474:

amid criticism of his response to the outbreak in the United States

3905:

US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, PMC

3867:

M. Beyer, Robert; Manica, Andrea; Mora, Camilo (26 January 2021).

3369: 3071:, and is not central to the role of WHO in the COVID-19 pandemic, 1617:

white space. Please say here if you don't agree with either action

3028:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/09/world/coronavirus-us-usa.html

2886:

Dedicated "Controversies" articles tend to be discouraged, see

400:

is there anymore information on this as it sounds fascinating

300:

The "criticism" in this section from an opinion piece violates

4563: 3227:

Did the USA actually withdraw from the WHO? Article is unclear

3093: 2981: 2768: 2638: 2419: 2285: 2196: 1946: 1845: 1661: 1102:

The nature of this statement has led some{who} pressure groups

114:

The following is a list of organizations that call themselves

98:

The following is a list of organizations that call themselves

25: 4267:

World Health Organization's response to the COVID-19 pandemic

2166:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2125:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2158: 2117: 1299:

Is the World Health Assembly the name of the first meeting?

4535:

Knowledge:Talk page guidelines#Marking a closed discussion

3553:

I could only move on the title name and change it to : -->

3509:

Includes Section for Scandals and protests related to WHO.

1009:

The potentially dated statements come from the use of the

209:

New blood-pressure guidelines pay off — for drug companies

528:

Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage (HWTS) program

4447:

Why does the article say China currently governs Taiwan?

2855:

Controversies relating to the World Health Organization

2324:

https://www.who.int/dg/who-headquarters-leadership-team

1360: 4463:

Membership and participation of the Republic of China"

4074:. Instead, information should be organized by topic. — 1816:

There is an omission of the true event that made WHO.

1921:

Any particular reason why this page remains locked?

1804:

http://www.haiweb.org/campaign/PPI/seminar200011.html

705:

job at presenting the controversy without the bias.--

3924:

Conspiracy Theories Covid/Global Health dictatorship

4051:No section about criticism and conspiracy theories 1638:Dr. Abha Saxena, Coordinator, Global Health Ethics 1319:The lists are a serious problem. Not just because 4029:Please add under "Data Handling and Publications" 3043:? searchResultPosition=2. Accessed 16 June 2020. 2586:Nebehay, Stephanie; Mason, Jeff (15 April 2020). 2361:. It's not clear what changes you want to make. – 3843:"Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Climate change" 185:Removed this inaccurate and misleading section: 130:. I think it belongs there. Thoughts, anyone? 2890:. There's a risk of such an article becoming a 2576:cut unnecessary detail for broad article on WHO 1794:http://www.mmv.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=27 784:Cook Islands and Niue are really sovereign? o_O 4012:Draft:Taiwan and the World Health Organization 74:I think a topic should be added, who agrees?-- 2940:This article needs a more systematic approach 1218:think seeking wider input would be suitable. 1104:. The who tags are gone, but still relavent. 494:Peace of Mind: The Silent Soul Bides its Time 8: 2193:Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2020 2152:"World Health Organisation (WHO)" listed at 2111:"World Health Organization (WHO)" listed at 2045:but would need some help for improving it.) 1842:Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2020 361:It's most likely represented by switzerland 3035:Virus Spread Advice. The New York Times. 2978:Semi-protected edit request on 17 June 2020 2685:accuracy -- not clear he has this authority 609:I too agree, and I have edited the page. — 4249: 4146:organizations, people etc.". There aren't 3928:There are so many. Neeeds single section. 3837: 3835: 3274: 3184: 3090:Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2020 2765:Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2020 2457:On 14 April 2020, United States President 2326: 2237: 1922: 1897:Thanks for pointing that out, we also use 1732: 1695: 1514: 865: 3734:Removed recent addition about WHO website 2848:Spinoff article for Controversies section 1786:partnerships listed are part of the WHO. 1727:) 11:05, 2 February 2020 (UTC) Thank you 761:191 or another number of representatives? 4473:from 1912 to 1949 and currently governs 4461:The text I'm referring to is under the " 3378:International Organization for Migration 1782:possibly to donate with their website). 1224:Knowledge:Manual_of_Style/Embedded_lists 1096:Not 100% sure but I think ot relates to 4556: 4038:2600:4040:780C:6F00:CC87:C7B1:3676:111E 3769: 2505: 1884:2606:A000:1127:C197:8C1E:5977:A99F:9215 1534: 896: 868: 226:That's where drug companies stepped in. 2659: 2648: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2917:Well reading the recommendation from 2462:pledged to halt United States funding 1777:budget of the WHO/partnership section 7: 2543: 2541: 2244:2405:201:800:6755:1D7:67ED:6DCB:EFFB 94:includes the following description: 3067:- This is more of a soapbox issue, 1308:Curing or something similar I hope. 1260:I have looked at the first section 803:Why is Cuba not colored on the map? 322:Why isn't Liechtenstein a member? - 3161:Thank you for pointing this out!-- 2534:. 14 April 2020 – via NYTimes.com. 1458:I believe that the definitions of 1169:Just a quick search: Kelley Lee's 934:Talk:World Health Organization/GA1 24: 3976:Rigby, Jennifer (July 31, 2022). 3818:"Yes, bacon really is killing us" 2548:McCarthy, Bill (April 21, 2020). 2521:clarity--referring to WHO, not US 2282:Requesting edits for Heads of WHO 2089:Already covered in the article. — 1582:IBM company". And how about "the 1315:Other stuff from a quick glance: 426:Opinionated and reads like PR. -- 108:Category:Pro-choice organizations 106:I added a similar description to 86:Category:Pro-choice organizations 3873:Science of The Total Environment 3152: 3097: 3058: 2985: 2820: 2772: 2741: 2632:Chappell, Bill (15 April 2020). 2423: 2352: 2289: 2258: 2200: 2001: 1950: 1849: 1711: 1665: 1364:opinions further down the line. 630:itself, so should be removed. -- 29: 4369:Female gentile mutilation (FGM) 4007:New draft on Taiwan and the WHO 3881:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145413 3019:Organization to make a claim. 2168:World Health Organisation (WHO) 2127:World Health Organization (WHO) 335:Has Montenegro been admited? - 149:Please see my rationale at the 92:Category:Pro-life organizations 3460:How about a Criticism section? 2704:Wang, Christine (2020-05-19). 1708:) 22:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC) 1281:What is the new body. The WHO? 1019:and while they show up in the 672:are provided to this section. 366:18:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 313:14:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 151:WikiProject Abortion talk page 18:Talk:World Health Organization 1: 4256:21:34, 6 February 2024‎ (UTC) 3760:16:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC) 3503:16:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC) 3478:13:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC) 3221:06:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC) 3205:Thanks, has now been fixed. — 3199:01:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC) 2643:. Retrieved 16 April 2020.... 1813:Dear writer of this article, 1739:2001:14BA:984A:F200:0:0:0:8EA 1702:2001:14BA:984A:F200:0:0:0:8EA 1606:12:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC) 1561:02:47, 28 December 2014 (UTC) 1529:18:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC) 1419:Another little known activity 1302:Honorifics are to be avoided. 1171:The World Health Organization 820:16:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC) 650:23:43, 15. Oct., 2008 (CET) 522:14:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 436:00:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 391:02:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 340:20:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4431:23:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 4409:04:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 4383:18:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 4337:05:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 4312:17:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 4285:14:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 4205:20:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 4046:11:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC) 3718:17:15, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3697:17:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3676:17:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3657:16:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3633:16:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3611:16:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3580:17:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3565:16:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3542:16:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3523:16:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 3452:16:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 3434:16:10, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 3409:20:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC) 2962:Otherwise what is its value? 2035:Alliance for Multilateralism 1985:2019-20 coronavirus pandemic 1747:10:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC) 1502:01:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC) 1330:. Much better to have prose. 857:15:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 798:20:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 666:22:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 617:01:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 542:16:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 482:02:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 276:00:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 4564:https://www.vigiaccess.org/ 4160:13:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC) 4133:14:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 4108:09:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 4090:20:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC) 4065:16:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC) 4024:22:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 3902:"Journal List Cited By ..." 3359:19:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 3340:14:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 3124:to reactivate your request. 3112:has been answered. Set the 3012:to reactivate your request. 3000:has been answered. Set the 2799:to reactivate your request. 2787:has been answered. Set the 2464:to the WHO while reviewing 2446:to reactivate your request. 2434:has been answered. Set the 2316:to reactivate your request. 2304:has been answered. Set the 2227:to reactivate your request. 2215:has been answered. Set the 1977:to reactivate your request. 1965:has been answered. Set the 1876:to reactivate your request. 1864:has been answered. Set the 1688:to reactivate your request. 1676:has been answered. Set the 1633:10:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 1572:International Monetary Fund 1441:03:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 173:13:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 126:keeps removing it from the 70:List of WHO Representatives 4582: 4226:How China Deceived the WHO 4117:issue waiting to happen. — 3394:Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus 3320:13:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC) 3289:04:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC) 3263:15:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC) 3242:14:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC) 2910:01:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 2882:01:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 2867:23:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 2375:16:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 2345:15:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 2277:15:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 2252:15:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 2188:21:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 2147:21:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 2105:15:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2084:09:04, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2055:07:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2022:13:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 1996:12:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 1911:22:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 1892:22:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 1535:'United Nations' is a name 1475:09:45, Jun 10, 2004 (UTC) 967:14:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 781:UN has 191 or 192 members? 715:14:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 699:11:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC) 600:01:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 291:16:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 4549:01:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 4522:00:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 4493:11:47, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 4002:16:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 3930:(Unsigned comment was by 3847:World Health Organization 3110:World Health Organization 3085:22:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 3053:20:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 2998:World Health Organization 2973:15:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 2935:16:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 2785:World Health Organization 2302:World Health Organization 2213:World Health Organization 1963:World Health Organization 1937:00:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 1862:World Health Organization 1837:12:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC) 1568:World Health Organization 1483:12:52, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1126:an indication, at least. 756:18:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC) 736:16:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 682:13:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC) 579:10:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 488:One little known activity 416:08:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 349:06:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 163:16:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 144:15:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 4469:(ROC), which controlled 3960:01:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 3944:01:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 3374:Medecins Sans Frontieres 3183:Why is the logo so big 3173:00:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 3146:22:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC) 3136:spelling: gain to again 2842:07:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC) 2815:07:03, 30 May 2020 (UTC) 2759:20:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 2736:17:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 2410:11:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2395:09:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2170:. Please participate in 2154:Redirects for discussion 2129:. Please participate in 2113:Redirects for discussion 1764:12:51, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1414:13:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 1399:08:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC) 1379:13:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC) 1251:22:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 1190:20:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 1164:20:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 1148:15:53, 19 May 2012 (UTC) 1119:13:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC) 1092:09:07, 19 May 2012 (UTC) 1065:08:49, 19 May 2012 (UTC) 1038:04:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 981:15:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 771:list of sovereign states 640:11:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 330:06:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 118:, or support this cause. 102:, or support this cause. 79:09:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 4036:Thank you very kindly, 2944:Please consider a more 2174:if you wish to do so. 2172:the redirect discussion 2133:if you wish to do so. 2131:the redirect discussion 1772:20:51, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1653:16:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC) 1612:Name in other languages 1004:09:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 377:Directors General order 4417:Performance assessment 3399:I suggest we keep it? 2658:Check date values in: 2163: 2122: 2071:15 April 2020 Politico 1943:Controversies Covid-19 1588:Allies of World War II 1468:User:Mr-Natural-Health 280: 264:editor Richard Horton. 2162: 2121: 1197:Good Article criteria 826:Authority and mandate 422:Summary of Activities 42:of past discussions. 3966:BioHub Pilot Project 3269:Reception of the WHO 1508:establishment of WHO 1464:tradtional mnedicine 1448:alternative medicine 128:WikiProject Abortion 3386:sexual exploitation 3304:Global institutions 3297:Global institutions 2965:Gianluigi Ambrogino 2946:systematic approach 2060:PRC influence, add? 1549:the United Nations' 1541:the United Nations' 625:Controversy section 612:Guillaume Pelletier 441:Smoking Controversy 327:(Er...let's shimmy) 296:World Health Report 189:Funding Controversy 181:Funding controversy 3932:User:Lovemankind83 2832:if appropriate. -- 2492:In mid-May, Trump 2480:"regrettable" and 2381:Peter Salama (RIP) 2164: 2123: 1321:prose is preferred 845:malaria prevention 396:Operation Cat Drop 110:to be consistent: 4467:Republic of China 4258: 3946: 3744:COVID-19 pandemic 3291: 3279:comment added by 3201: 3189:comment added by 3171: 3128: 3127: 3016: 3015: 2803: 2802: 2476:. WHO called the 2450: 2449: 2347: 2331:comment added by 2320: 2319: 2254: 2242:comment added by 2231: 2230: 2028:Current financing 2013:if appropriate. — 1981: 1980: 1939: 1927:comment added by 1880: 1879: 1825:It is up to you. 1749: 1737:comment added by 1709: 1700:comment added by 1692: 1691: 1531: 1519:comment added by 1492:comment added by 924: 923: 810:comment added by 726:comment added by 656:comment added by 590:comment added by 577: 472:comment added by 463: 418: 406:comment added by 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4573: 4566: 4561: 4532: 4504: 4465:heading as "The 4299: 3992: 3990: 3988: 3972:Spiez Laboratory 3929: 3916: 3915: 3913: 3911: 3898: 3892: 3891: 3889: 3887: 3864: 3858: 3857: 3855: 3853: 3839: 3830: 3829: 3816:(1 March 2018). 3810: 3804: 3799: 3793: 3792: 3790: 3789: 3774: 3710:Dawit S Gondaria 3707: 3689:Dawit S Gondaria 3686: 3625:Dawit S Gondaria 3621: 3557:Dawit S Gondaria 3552: 3530:User:Mx._Granger 3515:Dawit S Gondaria 3475: 3414:This feels like 3356: 3349: 3295:Awkward section 3179:Logo way too big 3165: 3160: 3156: 3155: 3119: 3115: 3101: 3100: 3094: 3066: 3062: 3061: 3007: 3003: 2989: 2988: 2982: 2824: 2823: 2794: 2790: 2776: 2775: 2769: 2745: 2744: 2720: 2719: 2717: 2716: 2701: 2695: 2692: 2686: 2683: 2677: 2674: 2668: 2667: 2661: 2656: 2654: 2646: 2644: 2629: 2623: 2620: 2614: 2611: 2605: 2604: 2602: 2600: 2583: 2577: 2574: 2568: 2564: 2558: 2557: 2545: 2536: 2535: 2528: 2522: 2519: 2513: 2510: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2441: 2437: 2427: 2426: 2420: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2311: 2307: 2293: 2292: 2286: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2222: 2218: 2204: 2203: 2197: 2186: 2184: 2179: 2145: 2143: 2138: 2020: 2005: 2004: 1972: 1968: 1954: 1953: 1947: 1871: 1867: 1853: 1852: 1846: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1683: 1679: 1669: 1668: 1662: 1629: 1624: 1602: 1597: 1504: 1393: 1373: 1249: 1234: 1216: 1203: 1146: 1131: 1113: 1090: 1075: 1063: 1048: 1032: 1018: 1012: 878:Copyvio detector 866: 822: 738: 668: 602: 566: 564: 562: 484: 464: 461: 453: 401: 310:Recurring dreams 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4581: 4580: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4562: 4558: 4526: 4498: 4449: 4292:GreatLeader1945 4289: 4187:GreatLeader1945 4152:GreatLeader1945 4100:GreatLeader1945 4057:GreatLeader1945 4053: 4031: 4016:ScrumptiousFood 4009: 3986: 3984: 3982:www.reuters.com 3975: 3968: 3926: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3909: 3907: 3900: 3899: 3895: 3885: 3883: 3866: 3865: 3861: 3851: 3849: 3841: 3840: 3833: 3812: 3811: 3807: 3800: 3796: 3787: 3785: 3776: 3775: 3771: 3736: 3701: 3680: 3615: 3546: 3511: 3473: 3462: 3352: 3347: 3327: 3300: 3271: 3229: 3181: 3153: 3151: 3117: 3113: 3098: 3092: 3059: 3057: 3005: 3001: 2986: 2980: 2952:Travel Expenses 2942: 2850: 2830:reliable source 2821: 2792: 2788: 2773: 2767: 2742: 2724: 2723: 2714: 2712: 2703: 2702: 2698: 2693: 2689: 2684: 2680: 2675: 2671: 2657: 2647: 2642: 2631: 2630: 2626: 2621: 2617: 2612: 2608: 2598: 2596: 2585: 2584: 2580: 2575: 2571: 2565: 2561: 2547: 2546: 2539: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2516: 2511: 2507: 2497: 2493: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2439: 2435: 2424: 2418: 2383: 2353: 2351: 2309: 2305: 2290: 2284: 2259: 2257: 2220: 2216: 2201: 2195: 2182: 2177: 2175: 2157: 2141: 2136: 2134: 2116: 2062: 2030: 2014: 2011:reliable source 2002: 1970: 1966: 1951: 1945: 1919: 1869: 1865: 1850: 1844: 1822:Is this weird? 1811: 1779: 1755: 1712: 1710: 1681: 1677: 1666: 1660: 1640: 1627: 1620: 1614: 1600: 1593: 1537: 1510: 1487: 1460:palliative care 1452: 1421: 1387: 1367: 1293:What countries? 1258: 1235: 1230: 1132: 1127: 1107: 1076: 1071: 1049: 1044: 1026: 1021:cleanup listing 1016: 1010: 991: 928:This review is 920: 892: 864: 828: 805: 763: 744: 721: 651: 632:147.171.255.159 627: 585: 558: 556: 549: 530: 490: 467: 460: 449: 443: 424: 398: 379: 320: 298: 283: 183: 89: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4579: 4577: 4568: 4567: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4537: 4471:mainland China 4448: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4260: 4259: 4254:comment added 4233: 4228: 4223: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4208: 4207: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4052: 4049: 4030: 4027: 4008: 4005: 3967: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3925: 3922: 3918: 3917: 3893: 3859: 3831: 3805: 3794: 3768: 3767: 3763: 3748:Climate change 3735: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3510: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3461: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3437: 3436: 3384:and ALIMA) of 3362: 3361: 3326: 3323: 3299: 3293: 3270: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3228: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3180: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3126: 3125: 3102: 3091: 3088: 3014: 3013: 2990: 2979: 2976: 2963: 2956: 2949: 2941: 2938: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2849: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2801: 2800: 2777: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2722: 2721: 2696: 2687: 2678: 2669: 2624: 2615: 2606: 2578: 2569: 2559: 2537: 2523: 2514: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2448: 2447: 2428: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2318: 2317: 2294: 2283: 2280: 2229: 2228: 2205: 2194: 2191: 2156: 2150: 2115: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2073: 2072: 2061: 2058: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 1979: 1978: 1955: 1944: 1941: 1918: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1903:Horse Eye Jack 1878: 1877: 1854: 1843: 1840: 1829:145.129.136.48 1810: 1807: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1754: 1751: 1690: 1689: 1670: 1659: 1656: 1639: 1636: 1613: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1576:European Union 1536: 1533: 1509: 1506: 1478: 1451: 1444: 1433:144.136.192.15 1420: 1417: 1402: 1401: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1310: 1309: 1303: 1300: 1294: 1288: 1282: 1276: 1270: 1257: 1254: 1193: 1192: 1151: 1150: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1041: 1040: 990: 987: 985: 939: 938: 922: 921: 919: 918: 913: 908: 902: 899: 898: 894: 893: 891: 890: 888:External links 885: 880: 874: 871: 870: 863: 860: 827: 824: 786: 785: 782: 762: 759: 743: 740: 718: 717: 688: 687: 684: 669: 626: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 604: 603: 592:141.161.58.106 553:United Nations 548: 545: 529: 526: 525: 524: 512:Austerlitz -- 502: 501: 489: 486: 442: 439: 423: 420: 397: 394: 383:Htmlqawsedrftg 378: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 354: 353: 352: 351: 319: 316: 297: 294: 282: 279: 273:69.208.181.183 250: 249: 248: 247: 246:on the agency. 240: 239: 238: 237: 230: 229: 228: 227: 221: 220: 219: 218: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197:on the agency. 191: 190: 182: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 120: 119: 104: 103: 88: 82: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4578: 4565: 4560: 4557: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4536: 4530: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4519: 4516: 4513: 4509: 4502: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4490: 4486: 4481: 4479: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4459: 4456: 4454: 4446: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4423: 4418: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4406: 4403: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4375: 4370: 4366: 4364: 4354: 4338: 4334: 4331: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4304: 4297: 4293: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4282: 4279: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4257: 4253: 4247: 4243: 4242: 4237: 4234: 4232: 4229: 4227: 4224: 4222: 4219: 4218: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4197: 4191: 4188: 4184: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4140: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4127: 4124: 4120: 4116: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4087: 4084: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4050: 4048: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4034: 4028: 4026: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4006: 4004: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3983: 3979: 3973: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3923: 3906: 3903: 3897: 3894: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3863: 3860: 3848: 3844: 3838: 3836: 3832: 3828: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3809: 3806: 3803: 3798: 3795: 3783: 3779: 3773: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3733: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3705: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3684: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3654: 3651: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3619: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3589: 3588: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3550: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3528:I agree with 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3497: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3476: 3469: 3467: 3464:For example, 3459: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3435: 3431: 3428: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3397: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3360: 3357: 3355: 3350: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3325:Controversies 3324: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3298: 3294: 3292: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3281:73.36.169.215 3278: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3257: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3215: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191:71.254.10.148 3188: 3178: 3174: 3169: 3164: 3159: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3134: 3131: 3123: 3120:parameter to 3111: 3107: 3103: 3096: 3095: 3089: 3087: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3065: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3033: 3029: 3024: 3020: 3011: 3008:parameter to 2999: 2995: 2991: 2984: 2983: 2977: 2975: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2961: 2953: 2947: 2939: 2937: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2911: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2874:Adoring nanny 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2798: 2795:parameter to 2786: 2782: 2778: 2771: 2770: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728:151.194.65.68 2711: 2707: 2700: 2697: 2691: 2688: 2682: 2679: 2673: 2670: 2665: 2652: 2641: 2640: 2635: 2628: 2625: 2619: 2616: 2610: 2607: 2595: 2594: 2589: 2582: 2579: 2573: 2570: 2563: 2560: 2555: 2551: 2544: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2527: 2524: 2518: 2515: 2509: 2506: 2489: 2460: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2445: 2442:parameter to 2433: 2429: 2422: 2421: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2363:Deacon Vorbis 2359: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2325: 2315: 2312:parameter to 2303: 2299: 2295: 2288: 2287: 2281: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2265: 2255: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2236: 2226: 2223:parameter to 2214: 2210: 2206: 2199: 2198: 2192: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2180: 2173: 2169: 2161: 2155: 2151: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2139: 2132: 2128: 2120: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2070: 2069: 2065:Kristine Lee 2064: 2063: 2059: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2018: 2012: 2008: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1976: 1973:parameter to 1964: 1960: 1956: 1949: 1948: 1942: 1940: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1929:36.11.225.151 1926: 1917:Unlock please 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1875: 1872:parameter to 1863: 1859: 1855: 1848: 1847: 1841: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1808: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1776: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1763: 1759: 1752: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1687: 1684:parameter to 1675: 1671: 1664: 1663: 1657: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1637: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1625: 1623: 1611: 1607: 1604: 1598: 1596: 1589: 1585: 1584:United States 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1544: 1542: 1532: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1507: 1505: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494:202.182.91.94 1491: 1484: 1482: 1476: 1474: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1456: 1449: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1428: 1424: 1418: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1391: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1371: 1362: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1348: 1339: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1262:Establishment 1255: 1253: 1252: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1233: 1227: 1225: 1219: 1211: 1207: 1198: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1149: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1130: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1111: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1074: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1047: 1039: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1030: 1022: 1015: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 988: 986: 983: 982: 978: 974: 969: 968: 964: 960: 956: 953: 950: 946: 943: 937: 935: 931: 926: 925: 917: 914: 912: 909: 907: 904: 903: 901: 900: 895: 889: 886: 884: 881: 879: 876: 875: 873: 872: 867: 861: 859: 858: 854: 850: 846: 840: 836: 833: 825: 823: 821: 817: 813: 809: 804: 800: 799: 795: 791: 783: 780: 779: 778: 776: 772: 768: 760: 758: 757: 753: 749: 742:Editing notes 741: 739: 737: 733: 729: 728:194.200.130.2 725: 716: 712: 708: 703: 702: 701: 700: 696: 692: 691:211.27.74.147 685: 683: 679: 675: 670: 667: 663: 659: 655: 649: 644: 643: 642: 641: 637: 633: 624: 618: 614: 613: 608: 607: 606: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 583: 582: 581: 580: 576: 573: 570: 563: 561: 554: 546: 544: 543: 539: 535: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 510: 509: 507: 499: 495: 492: 491: 487: 485: 483: 479: 475: 474:86.31.180.132 471: 465: 457: 455: 454: 452: 451:Into The Fray 440: 438: 437: 433: 429: 421: 419: 417: 413: 409: 408:212.87.70.232 405: 395: 393: 392: 388: 384: 376: 367: 364: 363:4.142.126.242 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 350: 347: 343: 342: 341: 338: 334: 333: 332: 331: 328: 325: 324:Tim Rhymeless 318:Liechtenstein 317: 315: 314: 311: 307: 303: 295: 293: 292: 289: 278: 277: 274: 270: 267: 263: 258: 257: 255: 244: 243: 242: 241: 234: 233: 232: 231: 225: 224: 223: 222: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 210: 206: 205:Seattle Times 195: 194: 193: 192: 188: 187: 186: 180: 174: 171: 166: 165: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 147: 146: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 117: 113: 112: 111: 109: 101: 97: 96: 95: 93: 87: 84:Inclusion in 83: 81: 80: 77: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4559: 4514: 4482: 4460: 4457: 4450: 4422:Gwillhickers 4421: 4416: 4401: 4374:Gwillhickers 4373: 4362: 4359: 4329: 4303:Gwillhickers 4302: 4277: 4250:— Preceding 4241:Gwillhickers 4240: 4196:Gwillhickers 4195: 4189: 4147: 4143: 4125: 4115:undue weight 4082: 4054: 4035: 4032: 4010: 3994:Smellyshirt5 3985:. Retrieved 3981: 3969: 3927: 3908:. Retrieved 3904: 3896: 3884:. Retrieved 3872: 3862: 3850:. Retrieved 3846: 3825: 3822:the Guardian 3821: 3808: 3797: 3786:. Retrieved 3784:. 2020-09-29 3781: 3772: 3764: 3737: 3649: 3603: 3512: 3495: 3470: 3466:The Guardian 3463: 3426: 3398: 3382:World Vision 3363: 3353: 3332:2.28.151.250 3328: 3307: 3302:The current 3301: 3275:— Preceding 3272: 3255: 3230: 3213: 3185:— Preceding 3182: 3157: 3135: 3132: 3129: 3121: 3106:edit request 3063: 3056: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3009: 2994:edit request 2959: 2951: 2945: 2943: 2916: 2902: 2851: 2825: 2804: 2796: 2781:edit request 2751:GoodCrossing 2746: 2725: 2713:. Retrieved 2709: 2699: 2690: 2681: 2672: 2660:|accessdate= 2637: 2627: 2618: 2609: 2597:. Retrieved 2591: 2581: 2572: 2562: 2526: 2517: 2508: 2478:announcement 2459:Donald Trump 2451: 2443: 2432:edit request 2416:Edit request 2384: 2357: 2327:— Preceding 2321: 2313: 2298:edit request 2263: 2256: 2238:— Preceding 2232: 2224: 2209:edit request 2165: 2124: 2097: 2074: 2066: 2031: 2016: 2006: 1982: 1974: 1959:edit request 1923:— Preceding 1920: 1881: 1873: 1858:edit request 1827: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1812: 1802: 1798: 1797: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1760: 1756: 1733:— Preceding 1716: 1696:— Preceding 1693: 1685: 1674:edit request 1645:MaynardClark 1641: 1621: 1615: 1594: 1579: 1553:62.16.186.44 1548: 1545: 1540: 1538: 1521:38.98.224.98 1515:— Preceding 1511: 1488:— Preceding 1485: 1477: 1463: 1459: 1457: 1453: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1403: 1389: 1388: 1369: 1368: 1353: 1344: 1314: 1311: 1305: 1296: 1290: 1284: 1278: 1272: 1261: 1259: 1231: 1228: 1220: 1194: 1170: 1152: 1128: 1109: 1108: 1101: 1097: 1072: 1045: 1042: 1028: 1027: 992: 984: 970: 951: 941: 940: 927: 916:Instructions 841: 837: 831: 829: 806:— Preceding 802: 801: 787: 774: 766: 764: 745: 719: 689: 658:84.56.241.55 648:84.56.209.22 628: 610: 559: 550: 531: 514:88.75.71.237 503: 450: 448: 444: 425: 399: 380: 321: 299: 284: 261: 259: 251: 204: 202: 184: 121: 105: 90: 73: 60: 43: 37: 4541:Jstncrdible 4529:Mx. Granger 4508:Mx. Granger 4501:Jstncrdible 4485:Jstncrdible 4395:Mx. Granger 4391:WP:CSECTION 4363:WP:CSECTION 4323:Mx. Granger 4319:WP:CSECTION 4296:Mx. Granger 4271:Mx. Granger 4183:Mx. Granger 4139:Mx. Granger 4119:Mx. Granger 4096:Mx. Granger 4076:Mx. Granger 4072:WP:CSECTION 3910:25 February 3886:25 February 3852:25 February 3814:Wilson, Bee 3683:Mx. Granger 3663:WP:CSECTION 3643:Mx. Granger 3639:WP:CSECTION 3618:Mx. Granger 3597:Mx. Granger 3593:WP:CSECTION 3489:Mx. Granger 3485:WP:CSECTION 3420:Mx. Granger 3249:Mx. Granger 3234:2.31.162.82 3163:regentspark 2923:WP:CSECTION 2919:WP:CSECTION 2888:WP:CSECTION 2333:Sahilmodi21 1658:Linky edits 1574:", or "the 996:Jezhotwells 930:transcluded 832:ought to be 812:67.204.8.39 722:—Preceding 652:—Preceding 586:—Preceding 468:—Preceding 402:—Preceding 211:that said: 36:This is an 4478:since 1945 3788:2021-10-28 3765:References 3312:Cyberflag1 3114:|answered= 3045:Nrandazzza 3002:|answered= 2892:WP:POVFORK 2807:Baisil1234 2789:|answered= 2726:Thoughts? 2715:2020-05-19 2554:Politifact 2494:pledged to 2488:Politifact 2436:|answered= 2306:|answered= 2217:|answered= 2178:TheAwesome 2137:TheAwesome 2017:KuyaBriBri 1967:|answered= 1866:|answered= 1678:|answered= 1513:another. 1406:FocalPoint 1347:FocalPoint 1210:WP:SELFPUB 1202:sources... 1178:0415370132 973:FocalPoint 959:FocalPoint 945:FocalPoint 883:Authorship 869:GA toolbox 777:". I ask: 428:Sabrown100 116:pro-choice 4539:{{Done}} 4144:important 3416:recentism 2834:TheImaCow 2826:Not done: 2466:the WHO's 2047:Supsudelu 2007:Not done: 1753:structure 1473:bodnotbod 1337:sections. 1232:Grandiose 1129:Grandiose 1073:Grandiose 1046:Grandiose 942:Reviewer: 906:Templates 897:Reviewing 862:GA Review 707:Gigoachef 498:Manoj Das 281:'Repairs' 207:article, 61:Archive 1 4518:contribs 4405:contribs 4333:contribs 4281:contribs 4129:contribs 4086:contribs 3987:July 31, 3653:contribs 3607:contribs 3499:contribs 3430:contribs 3277:unsigned 3259:contribs 3217:contribs 3187:unsigned 3073:WP:UNDUE 3064:Not done 2906:contribs 2859:SamHolt6 2651:cite web 2599:16 April 2567:question 2358:Not done 2341:contribs 2329:unsigned 2240:unsigned 2101:contribs 1925:unsigned 1809:History? 1735:unsigned 1729:Outriggr 1721:Outriggr 1698:unsigned 1570:", "the 1517:unsigned 1490:unsigned 1361:asked me 1357:contribs 1341:opinion. 1328:WP:synth 1246:contribs 1206:WP:UNDUE 1143:contribs 1087:contribs 1060:contribs 955:contribs 911:Criteria 849:Uncle Ed 808:unsigned 769:" While 748:Guptan99 724:unsigned 654:unsigned 588:unsigned 572:contribs 470:unsigned 404:unsigned 306:WP:UNDUE 288:Dorkules 269:12047986 236:nations. 170:Themalau 132:MamaGeek 100:pro-life 4252:undated 3952:CT55555 3936:CT55555 3782:Reuters 3752:EMsmile 3704:CT55555 3668:CT55555 3572:CT55555 3549:CT55555 3534:CT55555 3444:CT55555 3401:CT55555 3207:Granger 3168:comment 3138:Xxproto 3069:WP:SOAP 2896:Granger 2593:Reuters 2400:Fixed. 2091:Granger 1622:Noyster 1595:Noyster 1182:Lampman 1156:Lampman 989:Comment 547:Namebox 534:Tal Bee 506:NIMHANS 337:Privacy 140:Contrib 76:Eshcorp 39:archive 4475:Taiwan 4453:Taiwan 4185:& 3366:UNICEF 3354:(talk) 2950:1) If 2402:Prolog 2371:videos 2367:carbon 1988:Aelray 1899:Taiwan 1762:Alinor 1628:(talk) 1601:(talk) 1396:(talk) 1376:(talk) 1359:) has 1256:Review 1222:same. 1116:(talk) 1035:(talk) 790:Vinne2 773:says " 346:Alinor 262:Lancet 155:Severa 124:Severa 4436:(UTC) 4360:Yes, 4190:Agree 4141:: --> 3740:WP:OR 3474:Dandv 3390:abuse 3370:Oxfam 3118:|ans= 3104:This 3006:|ans= 2992:This 2927:Jmdwp 2793:|ans= 2779:This 2440:|ans= 2430:This 2310:|ans= 2296:This 2221:|ans= 2207:This 2043:draft 1971:|ans= 1957:This 1870:|ans= 1856:This 1770:Rd232 1682:|ans= 1672:This 1014:as of 932:from 575:email 508:(?). 302:WP:RS 16:< 4545:talk 4512:talk 4489:talk 4427:talk 4399:talk 4379:talk 4327:talk 4308:talk 4294:and 4275:talk 4246:talk 4213:See: 4201:talk 4156:talk 4148:many 4123:talk 4104:talk 4080:talk 4061:talk 4042:talk 4020:talk 3998:talk 3989:2022 3956:talk 3940:talk 3912:2022 3888:2022 3854:2022 3756:talk 3746:and 3714:talk 3693:talk 3672:talk 3647:talk 3629:talk 3601:talk 3576:talk 3561:talk 3538:talk 3519:talk 3493:talk 3448:talk 3424:talk 3405:talk 3388:and 3348:Kuru 3336:talk 3316:talk 3285:talk 3253:talk 3238:talk 3211:talk 3195:talk 3158:Done 3142:talk 3081:talk 3077:Zefr 3049:talk 2969:talk 2931:talk 2900:talk 2878:talk 2863:talk 2838:talk 2811:talk 2755:talk 2747:Done 2732:talk 2710:CNBC 2664:help 2601:2020 2406:talk 2391:talk 2387:Sjek 2337:talk 2273:talk 2269:Zefr 2264:Done 2248:talk 2183:Hwyh 2142:Hwyh 2095:talk 2080:talk 2051:talk 1992:talk 1933:talk 1907:talk 1888:talk 1833:talk 1743:talk 1725:talk 1717:Done 1706:talk 1649:talk 1557:talk 1525:talk 1498:talk 1481:Geni 1462:and 1437:talk 1410:talk 1390:corn 1370:corn 1351:talk 1242:talk 1186:talk 1175:ISBN 1160:talk 1139:talk 1110:corn 1100:and 1083:talk 1056:talk 1029:corn 1000:talk 977:talk 963:talk 949:talk 853:talk 816:talk 794:talk 752:talk 732:talk 711:talk 695:talk 678:talk 674:Yann 662:talk 636:talk 596:talk 569:Talk 560:李博杰 538:talk 518:talk 478:talk 432:talk 412:talk 387:talk 368:eric 304:and 266:PMID 136:Talk 4321:. — 4317:at 4269:. — 3877:doi 3116:or 3108:to 3075:. 3004:or 2996:to 2791:or 2783:to 2639:NPR 2498:WHO 2438:or 2308:or 2300:to 2219:or 2211:to 2076:X1\ 1969:or 1961:to 1868:or 1860:to 1731:. 1680:or 1580:the 1386:AIR 1366:AIR 1106:AIR 1025:AIR 496:by 159:!!! 4547:) 4520:) 4491:) 4480:" 4429:) 4407:) 4381:) 4335:) 4310:) 4283:) 4248:) 4238:- 4203:) 4158:) 4131:) 4106:) 4088:) 4063:) 4044:) 4022:) 4014:. 4000:) 3980:. 3958:) 3942:) 3934:) 3875:. 3871:. 3845:. 3834:^ 3824:. 3820:. 3780:. 3758:) 3716:) 3695:) 3674:) 3655:) 3631:) 3609:) 3578:) 3563:) 3540:) 3521:) 3501:) 3450:) 3432:) 3407:) 3380:, 3376:, 3372:, 3368:, 3338:) 3318:) 3287:) 3261:) 3240:) 3219:) 3197:) 3144:) 3122:no 3083:) 3051:) 3010:no 2971:) 2933:) 2908:) 2880:) 2865:) 2857:? 2840:) 2813:) 2797:no 2757:) 2734:) 2708:. 2655:: 2653:}} 2649:{{ 2636:. 2590:. 2552:. 2540:^ 2484:. 2444:no 2408:) 2393:) 2373:) 2369:• 2343:) 2339:• 2314:no 2275:) 2267:- 2250:) 2225:no 2103:) 2082:) 2053:) 1994:) 1975:no 1935:) 1909:) 1890:) 1874:no 1835:) 1745:) 1686:no 1651:) 1630:, 1619:: 1603:, 1592:: 1559:) 1527:) 1500:) 1471:-- 1439:) 1412:) 1248:) 1244:, 1240:, 1238:me 1212:: 1199:: 1188:) 1162:) 1145:) 1141:, 1137:, 1135:me 1089:) 1085:, 1081:, 1079:me 1062:) 1058:, 1054:, 1052:me 1017:}} 1011:{{ 1002:) 979:) 965:) 855:) 818:) 796:) 754:) 734:) 713:) 697:) 680:) 664:) 638:) 615:~ 598:) 565:| 540:) 520:) 480:) 434:) 414:) 389:) 161:) 142:) 4543:( 4531:: 4527:@ 4515:· 4510:( 4506:— 4503:: 4499:@ 4487:( 4425:( 4402:· 4397:( 4377:( 4330:· 4325:( 4306:( 4298:: 4290:@ 4278:· 4273:( 4244:( 4199:( 4154:( 4137:@ 4126:· 4121:( 4102:( 4094:@ 4083:· 4078:( 4059:( 4040:( 4018:( 3996:( 3991:. 3954:( 3938:( 3914:. 3890:. 3879:: 3856:. 3791:. 3754:( 3712:( 3706:: 3702:@ 3691:( 3685:: 3681:@ 3670:( 3650:· 3645:( 3627:( 3620:: 3616:@ 3604:· 3599:( 3574:( 3559:( 3551:: 3547:@ 3536:( 3517:( 3496:· 3491:( 3446:( 3427:· 3422:( 3403:( 3334:( 3314:( 3308:s 3283:( 3256:· 3251:( 3236:( 3214:· 3209:( 3193:( 3170:) 3166:( 3140:( 3079:( 3047:( 2967:( 2929:( 2903:· 2898:( 2876:( 2861:( 2836:( 2809:( 2753:( 2730:( 2718:. 2666:) 2662:( 2645:. 2603:. 2556:. 2500:. 2404:( 2389:( 2365:( 2335:( 2271:( 2246:( 2098:· 2093:( 2078:( 2049:( 1990:( 1931:( 1905:( 1886:( 1831:( 1741:( 1723:( 1704:( 1647:( 1590:" 1555:( 1547:' 1523:( 1496:( 1450:. 1435:( 1408:( 1354:· 1349:( 1236:( 1184:( 1173:( 1158:( 1133:( 1077:( 1050:( 998:( 975:( 961:( 952:· 947:( 851:( 814:( 792:( 765:" 750:( 730:( 709:( 693:( 676:( 660:( 634:( 594:( 567:— 536:( 516:( 476:( 462:C 458:/ 430:( 410:( 385:( 157:( 138:/ 134:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index