Talk:Weld quality assurance

933:

a key point. What we have here is an article only about one particular person's product, and the title of the article is the name that he gave his particular product. I'm not sure if there are other similar products. I'd be willing and able to absorb / digest any technical material (including highly technical material) that anyone can email me whether it be for the purpose of adding material to the article or to see where we're at. But I'm not ready to take on looking for and obtaining off-line sources. I see the only viable possibilities to be an article on this particular method (as this article is) or on the general topic of weld analysis via signal processing. I think that one of those should exist, which means I don't think we're any longer talking about a potential AFD situation.

1903:

here it refers to that one particular person/company/organization's methods of weld monitoring. Second, while there is technical sounding stuff in there, it really doesn't explain even the basics on the technology. I planned to write (summarize from the sources) that part if I could get the technicla papers from Tony1, but as it turned out he no longer has them. So, even the technical sounding stuff is really promotional rather than informative. Also, as an aside, after a lot of searching, this looks like an idea that that sort of faded out many years ago, although I'm not sure of that. So, while this probably meets notability and thus

317:

contact microphone. By listening to gearboxes with known faults (chipped bearings etc.) our system learned the sounds of a fault, then could recognise them in the future. We never knew what these sounds were (the machine did), but the "signature" expressed them in some way that our trained expert system had itself learned to recognise. This is a more useful system than a parametric approach where you predict that if gear #3 breaks, you'll expect a noise of 440Hz, so you listen out for that noise. This is why signature processing works for practical machines, when the parametric approach was too difficult to configure.

452:

leg-work with the other journals at the time, because they were easily at hand, but tried to avoid being what I thought was too technical. But on thinking further about it, the broader concept of signature processing could make a good article: the audio pick-up from gears looks analogous (unsure that it really is, but it could be). Are you guys able to write an article on the broader concept? It looks like one is needed. And although I think this one was the first to use signature

113: 92: 619:

There's nothing on how a "signature" is generated, on how a signature is evaluated into good or bad, or on how the system is trained to generate such rules. All of these should be answered within this article - that's not asking for proprietary algorithms to be published. Incidentally, what about patents for this, and links to them? As accessible published documents, these are a great resource for WP.

1032:

product. That's his perogotive....he could name it "purple dinosaur" if he wants to. What has happened is that Knowledge has taken his chosen trad name and made it the title of the article. If the article is to be just about his particular method, that's fine. But if there is other similar weld analysis being done, then it probably would need a broader scope and different title.

61: 433:

non-expert, and greater technical detail is supported in the refs (can you point to other WP articles that print the details of algorithms for such technologies? ... and even if you did find one, does that mean it's necessary to include? The topic is clearly notable on the basis of WP's policy. You keep talking about "the company", but there is none as far as I can see.

32: 1993: 611:. The refs are not there to explain the function - the article should do this, the refs are there to demonstrate the veracity of this content. If the link exists because the content is only to be found there, not in the article, then they belong under "External links", not "References". The reader should gain their understanding by reading 1883:

My main concern was with the promotional nature of the SIP article and the OR-inherent nature of the title (and definition) of this article. By moving this article, and I hope tightening up its lead/definition, we address my concern about this article. We really don't need to discuss the possible SIP

978:

There is no "image", right? No cameras? No 2-d arrangement of pixels whose brightness or color depends on some property of the weld? This is indeed an unfortunate mis-naming of the process, but there's nothing Wikpeida can do about it because it's the original inventor who chose to be confusing. It

395:

Refs 4, 9, and 10, plus the patent text, contain the technical details, I suppose. But how technical should the article be? WP's guidelines tend to want articles to be written to a wider readership, provided they're properly referenced. I don't have access to these references any more (not online ...

1902:

To a technical person, the SIP section has two other problems which are not readily evident. #1 is that the title is sort of deceptive. SIP sounds like a general technical name that their specific technology falls under, but it isn't. While the three word combination may have other random uses, but

932:

Thanks. Now I understand. Here are some comments and answers to the questions. Those additions are nice. They are also, as would be expected from the owner of the particular technology, very vague and not informative on the specifics of topic. I don't hold that against him. But it reinforces

622:

I fail to see where "image" fits into this at all. Presumably there isn't any sort of camera sensor imaging the arc. Is it a pseudo-image, where some scatter-ploy of V.I distribution is used to build up a two-dimensional representation, which can then be processed by off-the-shelf algorithms already

535:

Most applications of signal processing to sensing start out and idea or concept which says that a physical parameter (e.g. sound for gearboxes, presumably welding process voltage and/or current waveforms for welding, plus some signal processing method to pull the desired information out of a complex

474:

Tony, I just realized that you wrote the article. So, first things first, PLEASE PLEASE accept my apology for what is in hindsight the tactless way that I discussed it, and for not checking the history first. Also, knowing that it was written by someone who was not doing it to promote the company

1257:

article talk page. About a week ago I indicated that I plan/propose to roll this article into a broader article on weld monitoring, testing and analysis, roughly per the outline in my August post. In case haven't been watching the article but would like to give input on this I thought I'd drop you

1236:

I'm thinking of doing idea #2. Just to be clear, this will temporarily leave the new article in an awkward position. A bunch of stub sections or sections with headings only (i.e. a framework/skeleton) and then a large "Stephen Simpson method, Signature image processing" section which would be 90%

618:

I don't know how this things works. I don't know which welding processes it can be applied to (the answer is not "arc welding" - just read our SMAW or GMAW articles to see what a range there is). I don't know what is being measured directly - voltage / current? I don't know what "image" means here.

2055:

Tony, from a process standpoint, we floated the name idea here for 7 days with no objections before doing. (probably the first thing Novaseminary and I have really agreed on in a year :-) ) It think that it was also responsive to the comments at the AFD against compound titles. But answering your

1803:

Yes, and that's enough for an article. Signature processing isn't unique, even for welding, although I've not heard "image" applied to it before outside this article. As it stands, this article is very unbalanced between stub-level content on a huge range, with most of the article focussed on this

1704:

One hand grenade in the recent barrage had a possible gem in it which, if one puts the article quality first, shouldn't be ignored. Namely, a possible alternate name for the article "Weld quality assurance". I think that that would be a good name change. It's broad enough to encompass the three

908:

It seems obvious that it's an important advance in quality assurance for a certain type of welding process. It's supported amply by academic references and other notable publications and broadcasts. Yes, in the larger scheme, a different name might have fitted into the conceptual scheme of things,

791:

That sounds like a fine approach to studying welds, and it would clearly fall under "signature images". If you learn to weld (I have basic qualifications for gas, stick & MIG) the split between "amateur" and "apprentice" really begins when formal training requires you not only to weld, but to

432:

I guess it "enables welding processes to be optimised ... using algorithms to assess the quality of the welds produced in robotic manufacturing" bypassing the need for "a definitive understanding of phenomena "—to piece together what the text says. The scientific concept is clear even to me as a

221:

The title looks like one company's specific term for an invention of theirs. I found no indication that the subject term is in use anywhere now, and even back then outside of by that one company. The article is written as promotional copy for that company, and now it appears that the company no

1866:

This is from the person who said that even the broader article which had SIP within it "Further, this seems not much more than a vehicle to promote the academic whose photo appears below and whose work is the only work profiled here". If we were to think about reversing the three month decision

763:

I found the inventor's university webpage and emailed him. Amazingly, he got back this morning. He agreed the company thing is secondary, and said the article needs updating, here, add these. So I translated from engineeringese. Can you review it. If a parent article is more appropriate to house

377:

I often write and edit published technical articles. This article is one which I would call absolutely free of technical content, basically a promotional article disguised as a technical article. Rather than me dissecting the whole article, Tony, why don't you pick a paragraph which you feel is

1772:

Only as far as I think it would be better split, with an article for Weld testing under that name (or some variant, Weld QA qould be fine) and then the bulk of this article returned to an article on the signature analysis technique specifically. We need an article on Weld QA, that's clearly an

580:

Thinking through it now, I'd have though signature processing might end up being a parent article, with signature image, audio signal, etc being offspring articles. Perhaps that's too far into the future. Isn't what astonomers do with light and gravity measurements, and possibly biologists on a

316:

Expand the context for signature processing, ideally by linking to (maybe writing) a broad article on the topic. When I was doing this, we had recently released PD sourcecode from the US Navy for sonar processing (post Cold War peace dividend) and we used it to listen to car gearboxes through a

844:

I also am not sure who wrote "that looked like a really neat idea, the concept of x-raying welds, so to speak, and building a library of patterns that allow you to identify cracks and other imperfections" or what they meant with respect to this article. , and it looks important. Could y'all

655:

A plot of dependent variable(s) against an independent variable (i.e. time) is a line graph, not an image. It is one-dimensional data, not two-dimensional. Plotting V against I would give a two-dimensional plot, thus a real image, but either or both of these against time is a simpler situation

1031:

I guess context matters. In terms of the inherent structure of what is being analyzed, it is one or two variables over time, not a matrix of data (image) One could argue that the graph of the variables vs time is an image, and that is probably what the inventor was thinking when he named his

451:

Sorry to be vague: it's quite a few years back, and I picked what looked like a really neat idea, the concept of x-raying welds, so to speak, and building a library of patterns that allow you to identify cracks and other imperfections, from ref 11, which is not a technical journal. I did some

1907:

be a separate article, that doesn't necessarily mean that a seperate article is the best choice. What we decided is that it shouldn't be, but instead become a section in an article on a broader topic which is conspicuously absent from Knowledge. I partially condensed the SIP material, but

305:

The tone needs work, but "signature processing" is a well-known technique in manufacturing control. Twenty years ago I was building systems for it myself (gearboxes and power presses though, rather than welding). This article seems to be on a company that has developed a strand of this broad

950:

It would be perfectly possible to replace your use of "product" with "science", wouldn't it? The product is just the commercial embodiment of the science, and I believe the scientist/inventor see the science as much more important than that embodiment (and the article name refers—however

1884:

article here now. If it meets N, it can be created/recreated/spun-off subject to any disagreeing ed taking that article to AfD (either for a straight deletion, or one of the alternatives for deletion). The question here would be how much of a SIP article should remain here, etc., per

312:

Editing of the business aspect to remove any concerns over spam. This is the usual copyediting: stripping the weasels and peacocks, not claiming anything that isn't supportable, not listing office addresses, the name of the vice-president for paperclips, or the non-encyclopedic

730:

In industrial automation, a SET of technologies/methods/areas of expertise/specialized equipment is often the "subject". If the idea of using signal processing to asnalyze welds is in use, I think that THAT should be the article. One of the main fields drawn upon to do it is

1237:

of this article. But in the long run I thank that that would lead to creation of the much-needed slightly broader article, and the resolution of the problems with this article, further reinforced by the new tag that someone (correctly) put on. Any objections?

1773:

important topic. Yet the coverage here so far is only at stub level. The signature technique is novel and seems to meet notability on its own, and we already have far better coverage on that. There's enough material for two articles, even at the current level.

543:

a field vs. just one invention. Signature image processing is not a basic description of this...it's sort of a novel/creative way to describe it, this leads to concerns that it may be a term which the company/inventor/owner uses top refer to their particular

865:"So I translated from engineeringese."—that is, I translated from his emailed text, which wasn't in WP-type format; I worked out where the expansions would go; I added refs that he gave, using WP syntax and consistent formatting with the pre-existing refs. 185:

Note: In November 2011 this article was moved from "Signature image processing" to "Weld monitoring, testing and analysis ", and on December 24th, 2011 it was moved/renamed to "Weld quality assurance". Please understand talk items with this in mind.

2123:

I didn't like it (as it was) either. But by "push/put" us a step forward, the area covered by that material is a major area missing from this article, and getting it started, even in that problematic form, was a messy step in the right direction.

306:

technique with application to welding. Now that seems like a good topic to me: it has coverage for basic notability, the technique is of encyclopedic interest and we do cover businesses within WP without everything turning into content-free spam.

1681:

Nice work finding that new source. Since the statements that the current source supports are merely that those methods exist, I think that even the current sources is sufficient. But the upgrade tht you found and suggested is good idea.

862:"here, add these."—I was paraphrasing, very quickly, what the inventor said to me in his emailed response. That is, "here are some comments you might add to the article to make it more scientifically explicit, and to bring it up to date." 827:

I didn't understand "here, add these. So I translated from engineeringese. Can you review it. If a parent article is more appropriate to house this, are you willing to write it?" and it looks important. Could you explain? Thanks.

1460:

Found a piece on line about signature image processing method. Has much info on the the attributes of the welding process that it utilizes. I left it in just as an external link for now until we can more thoroughly absorb it.

871:"If a parent article is more appropriate to house this, are you willing to write it?" Means, there was talk above of a broader topic ("Signature processing", I guess): does this still have a bearing on the current article? 1943:

I don't remember that reversion (unless you are referring to the split) but either way I think it should be reduced. I already took out the easy-to-pick stuff. But we should do with a scalpel, not a chainsaw. :-)

1436: 792:

section and polish your welds afterwards. However that's a destructive testing process - as I read this article, it's a non-destructive in-process quality measure that doesn't require welds to be sampled afterwards.

547:

I don't have ready access to any of thos papers. If someone could email me one of them I'd be happy to read through it and see if I can be helpful in the above areas or if it clears up any questions. Sincerely,

242:

Err ... there are 11 items in the ref list, many of them in scientific journals. The topic is clearly notable. I think you'll find from reading those that the term is not some company's, but the research engineer's.

42: 1058:

I did some technical searches and found a lot. This is basically a large topic which is about 1% covered in Knowledge, the 1% being the Stephen Simpson "Signature image processing" method covered in this article.

893:

As this article has clearly made it to Wtshymanski's radar, then no, I'm not prepared to waste time on either this or a related article, only to have him follow along afterwards and delete it section by section.

1924:

I would fully support cutting down, or all but eliminating, the SIP material in this article. (I already tried to do it but you reverted.) Whether SIP gets its own article, though, is based on whether it meets

1012:

If we keep diluting the language like this, eventually we'll all be reduced to pointing and grunting. I'd like "imaging" to mean some process that eventually produces a *picture*, darn it; even if it's using

1867:

process and splitting SIP back off, there would be a lot more to talk about that I'd need more time for. But it appears that there is no opposition to the rename of THIS article to"Weld quality assurance".

2109:. If any of it can be salvaged, cited, and reinserted in an appropriate place rather than stuck in the lead, the world would be a better place. But Knowledge is better off without it until then. 994:

I don't disagree; but even as a layperson, I'd not put such strictures on the definition of "image". They image stars via gravitons nowadays, and it's not an image in the photographic sense.

1414:

At this time the name of the article changed from "Signature image processing" to "Weld monitoring, testing and analysis". So all talk prior to this point refers to the previous article.

207:

Need to locate the other scientific publications that form the foundation for the technology. Need to assess whether brief mentions of SIP might be made in other welding-related articles.

493:

No problem, I think you were right to raise issues; fact is, it needs more referencing and I like the idea of integrating it into a broader topic (if the concept can be made to fit).

265:

I'll be gone for 4 1/2 days. There's no hurry so might be good to discuss then. But my main thought is that the article really doesn't cover the topic; it's really just sales talk.

539:

I think that if it is currently being done, that doing this for weld analysis would be / is an excellent article. I'm not knowledgeable in that field; actually I'm not sure that it

1787:

But SIP is just one company's name for for their particular method of using analysis of the voltage and current waveforms and the relationship between them for weld monitoring.

785:

what looked like a really neat idea, the concept of x-raying welds, so to speak, and building a library of patterns that allow you to identify cracks and other imperfections,

607:

The "Development" and "Industrial use" sections are OK, for covering what the headers suggest they should cover. However there is still no coverage to explain what this thing

225:

I'd say retain it's technical content merged into another article, except there is none. The stuff that appears to be technical content isn't, it's just vague sales talk.

326:

Describe the algorithmic processing to extract a signature from the measurement, and the categorisation algorithms that can identify behaviours from these varied signatures.

1530:

I finished absorbing it. It provides good foundation material for SIP and also briefly intorduces SIP, but does not explain SIP. A good source fore certain aspects.

670:

A picture of the plot would be an image, but that wasn't my point. I was more trying to guess at how somebody might have thought up putting "image" into the name.

414:

My comment would be less about spotting particular items as overly "promotional" and more about the article being nearly 8k long, yet still not communicating what it

1740:

Actually it was a complaint about behavior, not a personal attack. But I think one too many in the spirit of new hope. Sorry. Good source find and good name idea!

656:(because time is independent, ie its progress is unaffected by the welding behaviour). V/t graphs could well be a "signature", but not AFAIC a "signature image". 1593:

I think SIP meets N on its own. If you disagree, send it to AfD. If you disagree with how I summarized it here (with a link to the main SIP article), change it.

2157: 163: 153: 1908:

envisioned it being further condensed, but with material possibly added with a true technical explanation if the sources became available. Sincerely,

320:

Describe what they measure, ie. the easily accessible parameter of the process here (which I assume is the electrical behaviour of the welding supply)

129: 2152: 951:

problematically—to the science, not a product). Apparently the Osaka people have pursued something similar, without acknowledgement. Hmmm ....

358:

The algorithms are possibly not public: bit detailed even for a WP article. Are you serious about printing them? Not the usual thing, I think.

639:(Added later) Or considering a v or I vs time plot to be an "image" and a "signature" (e.g. like an ocilliscope view) and processing that. 2056:

question directly, the thought is that all of those items in the previous title fall under quality assurance, including analysis. Sincerely,

1253:

I plan to put the following on the talk pages of the persons who posted here in the last 6 months. "Hi, I noticed that you commented at the

1220:

I'm assuming that you mean one of my final 2 "practical choices"? And if so, which one? Also, are you able to email me any of those papers?

1478:

Novaseminary just deleted it. This article isn't going to be able to develop under such an assault. I'll put it back in as a source.

120: 97: 1167:

Create / morph this into a "Weld monitoring" article ("2." from the above) and leave this article as the only section in it (for now)

2084:

The substantial additions made today hav some issues that need to get fixed, but I think that they put/push us a step forward.

323:

Describe the welding process, its variables and faults, and which of these are amenable to analysis by their external feature.

1568:

Last night Novaseminary gutted this article by removing all of the SIP material back into a separate article. I reverted.

1512:

May / may not qualify as an RS, but RS is a condition for fulfilling sourcing requirements, not for inclusion of a source.

1164:

Leave this article as is, being 2.1.1 from the above. Let someone else worry about the other 99% when they are up to it.

72: 806:

The quote—I'm confused about your response to it. I was describing how I came to write the article in the first place.

1851:

If SIP meets N, it should get its own article. I think it barely does. I would agree with Andy’s proposal on this.

1254: 1666:. At the very least, the citation needs to be corrected, and I would suggest that as is, this link is not an RS. 1548:

I support North's handling of this rename/revamp. Nova, please do not make unilateral changes without consensus.

396:

and I don't plan on hiking to the library for them). Do you? Can you point out where the promotional content is?

38: 2035:

Assurance? I'd have though "analysis". I don't see assurance here, not at this earlier part of the pipeline.

735:

but, per the previous sentence, that does not make this article a subset of signal processing. Sincerely,

2114: 2095: 2007: 1934: 1893: 1856: 1809: 1778: 1731: 1671: 1598: 1503: 1181:) 18:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Finally, if anyone would be able to email me any of the technical papers on 899: 797: 661: 628: 423: 335: 17: 1888:. The promotional aspects of the SIP have been tempered somewhat, and could be fixed entirely by editing. 1331: 1022: 984: 519:

which is processing of multi-dimensional (typically 2) image-type-arrays of information. More to come.

78: 456:(in more than just welding), I wonder whether sig. imaging has since been applied to other areas now. 378:

actually describing the subject of the article and then I'll chime in on how it isn't? Sincerely,

60: 31: 2131: 2091: 2063: 2026: 1971: 1951: 1915: 1874: 1829: 1794: 1763: 1747: 1712: 1689: 1625: 1575: 1537: 1519: 1485: 1468: 1446: 1421: 1387: 1347: 1314: 1298: 1282: 1265: 1244: 1227: 1192: 1178: 1066: 1039: 940: 852: 835: 742: 677: 646: 555: 526: 482: 385: 272: 232: 193: 128:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1658:

that probably has not been touched in years. This seems to be a copy of part of some version of

2110: 2003: 1930: 1889: 1885: 1852: 1805: 1774: 1727: 1667: 1594: 1499: 895: 793: 732: 657: 624: 512: 419: 331: 1618:

No, please stop your disruptive editing, and get a consensus before trying such huge changes.

1327: 1018: 980: 909:

but I don't see that as an issue that can be dealt with by WP. We just cover what is there.

516: 2044: 1557: 1210: 1002: 959: 917: 879: 814: 772: 700: 589: 501: 464: 441: 404: 366: 289: 251: 1125:

2.1.1 Stephen Simpson method, "Signature image processing" (contents of this article)

112: 91: 1014: 511:

Thank you so much! Now on to a few details. The overall technical field of the is

2146: 1723: 1659: 1307:

Not sure on exactly what Andy Dingley meant, but it looks like it's fine with him.

125: 2135: 2118: 2067: 2050: 2030: 2011: 1975: 1955: 1938: 1919: 1897: 1878: 1860: 1833: 1813: 1798: 1782: 1767: 1751: 1735: 1716: 1693: 1675: 1629: 1602: 1579: 1563: 1541: 1523: 1507: 1489: 1472: 1450: 1425: 1391: 1351: 1335: 1318: 1302: 1286: 1269: 1248: 1231: 1215: 1196: 1070: 1043: 1026: 1007: 988: 964: 944: 922: 903: 884: 856: 839: 819: 801: 777: 746: 705: 681: 665: 650: 632: 594: 581:

nano-scale, signature processing? I don't have enough knowledge to take the lead.

559: 530: 506: 486: 469: 446: 427: 409: 389: 371: 339: 294: 276: 256: 236: 211: 197: 1756:

Is there any objection to changing the article name to "Weld quality assurance"?

1926: 1663: 1655: 1156:

Seeing the scale of that, and no real expert to write it, my best two suggested

868:"Can you review it?" That means, "Can either of you review what I've inserted?" 2037: 1550: 1203: 995: 952: 910: 872: 807: 765: 693: 582: 494: 457: 434: 397: 359: 282: 244: 208: 1185:

I'd be happy to absorb those and write a "technical core" of this article.

349:

Where's the weasel? I did go through yesterday and prune obvious offenders.

1073:

To open a huge can of worms, here's what I'd consider to be the ideal:

1705:

subjects currently in the title, and a shorter and more elegant title.

2101:

It had more than "some issues" and was entirely unsourced, etc. With

1437:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Weld monitoring, testing and analysis

1431:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Weld monitoring, testing and analysis

1015:

deBroglie waves and tachyon interference in the flux core generators

1495: 692:

You haven't answered the larger structural issue I just raised.

1494:(ec) It doesn't belong in the EL section, so I removed it. But 1439:

Also see article edits/edit summaries for the run-up to this.

1275:

I did it. So far Tony1 responded, supporting the change/idea.

1380:

Done. I also did some work on it but it needs much much more.

475:

is an important, useful, new piece of information. Sincerely,

54: 26: 1822:

that way as a way to cause the other material to get built.

1654:, the most cited reference in this article (footnote 2) is 1456:

Found a bit more in depth info on signature image processing

1202:

Sounds like a great advance. I can copy-edit at some stage.

979:

would be nice to have this clearly explained in the lead. --

1960:

Either way I think that we're ready for the name change on

1498:. I'm not sure it is an RS, either, but ”absorb” at will. 352:

There's no company; I believe it's owned by a university.

1410:

At this point then name and scope of the article changed

2106: 2102: 1651: 1324: 1119:

2. Weld monitoring (= while the weld is occurring)

124:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2105:I reverted. The material is not "gone", of course. 1435:Novaseminary nominated the article for deletion at 1131:

2.1.3 Other arc welding electrical analysis method

1128:

2.1.2 Other arc welding electrical analysis method

615:, not by just using the article as a reading list. 1662:of which there are many versions dating back to 1083:1. Weld Analysis (= after the weld is done) 8: 1323:Andy's been sulking ever since he found out 1818:Thaw was the discussed plan, that it would 1103:1.2 Destructive weld testing and analysis 86: 18:Talk:Weld monitoring, testing and analysis 355:The article mainly concerns the research. 41:on 5 December 2011 (UTC). The result of 88: 58: 1291:Wtshymanski also supported proceeding. 1122:2.1 Arc welding electric signal based 281:What aspects/wording is "sales talk"? 2079: 1078:Weld monitoring, testing and analysis 7: 2158:Mid-importance Metalworking articles 1136:2.2 Visual/imaging-based monitoring 118:This article is within the scope of 764:this, are you willing to write it? 77:It is of interest to the following 1086:1.1 Non-destructive weld analysis 138:Knowledge:WikiProject Metalworking 25: 623:built to process camera images? 141:Template:WikiProject Metalworking 1991: 111: 90: 59: 30: 1054:Article subject, scope and name 309:I'd like to see the following: 158:This article has been rated as 37:This article was nominated for 212:02:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 2153:C-Class Metalworking articles 2080:Today's substantial additions 2068:11:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2051:02:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2031:16:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 2012:16:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 1976:15:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1956:21:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1939:20:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1920:17:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1898:16:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1879:12:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1861:21:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 1834:20:13, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1814:18:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1799:18:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1783:17:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1768:17:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1752:18:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1736:17:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1717:14:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1694:12:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1676:06:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1630:21:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 1603:15:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 1580:13:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 1564:13:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 1542:15:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 1426:03:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1392:10:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC) 1352:21:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1336:22:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1319:21:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1303:18:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1287:13:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1270:12:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1249:15:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC) 198:16:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 132:and see a list of open tasks. 2136:11:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC) 2119:05:01, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 2107:It can be seen and read here 2096:00:41, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 1524:19:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1508:15:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1490:14:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1473:12:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1451:14:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1726:aside, I'm glad you agree. 1232:13:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 1216:01:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 1197:18:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 1071:17:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 1044:17:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 1027:14:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 1008:14:19, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 989:13:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 965:14:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 945:14:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 923:14:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 904:14:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 885:12:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 857:09:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 840:09:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 820:12:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 802:09:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 778:03:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 747:02:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 706:02:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 682:11:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 666:09:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 651:02:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 633:02:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 595:01:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 560:00:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 531:17:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 507:17:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 487:16:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 470:16:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 447:15:52, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 428:15:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 410:15:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 390:02:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 372:10:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 340:10:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 295:04:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 277:17:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC) 257:12:38, 18 August 2011 (UTC) 237:12:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC) 2174: 1255:Signature image processing 164:project's importance scale 157: 106: 85: 121:WikiProject Metalworking 1258:this note. Sincerely, 1076:Hypothetical Article: 346:Some good points, Andy. 2002:- moved this article. 1092:1.1.2 Microscopy based 67:This article is rated 1804:one novel technique. 1656:this personal website 144:Metalworking articles 1700:Possible name change 1150:2.3 Other approaches 1089:1.1.1 Acoustic based 1340:OK, so here goes! 1095:1.1.3 Imaging Based 1660:this Army circular 1098:1.1.4 Other method 845:clarify? Thanks. 515:. BTW, it's not 73:content assessment 733:Signal processing 513:Signal processing 181:Name change notes 178: 177: 174: 173: 170: 169: 53: 52: 16:(Redirected from 2165: 2129: 2089: 2061: 2049: 2047: 2042: 2024: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1969: 1949: 1913: 1872: 1827: 1792: 1761: 1745: 1710: 1687: 1623: 1573: 1562: 1560: 1555: 1535: 1517: 1483: 1466: 1444: 1419: 1385: 1345: 1312: 1296: 1280: 1263: 1242: 1225: 1213: 1208: 1190: 1176: 1112:1.2.3 Method #3 1109:1.2.2 Method #2 1106:1.2.1 Method #1 1064: 1037: 1005: 1000: 974:Unfortunate name 962: 957: 938: 920: 915: 882: 877: 850: 833: 817: 812: 775: 770: 740: 703: 698: 675: 644: 592: 587: 553: 524: 517:Image processing 504: 499: 480: 467: 462: 444: 439: 407: 402: 383: 369: 364: 292: 287: 270: 254: 249: 230: 222:longer exists. 191: 146: 145: 142: 139: 136: 115: 108: 107: 102: 94: 87: 70: 64: 63: 55: 34: 27: 21: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2143: 2142: 2125: 2085: 2082: 2057: 2045: 2038: 2036: 2020: 1996: 1992: 1965: 1945: 1909: 1868: 1823: 1788: 1757: 1741: 1724:personal attack 1706: 1702: 1683: 1648: 1646:Reliable source 1619: 1569: 1558: 1551: 1549: 1531: 1513: 1479: 1462: 1458: 1440: 1433: 1415: 1412: 1381: 1341: 1308: 1292: 1276: 1259: 1238: 1221: 1211: 1204: 1186: 1172: 1145:2.2.1 Method #6 1142:2.2.1 Method #5 1139:2.2.1 Method #4 1060: 1056: 1033: 1003: 996: 976: 960: 953: 934: 918: 911: 880: 873: 846: 829: 815: 808: 773: 766: 736: 701: 694: 671: 640: 590: 583: 549: 520: 502: 495: 476: 465: 458: 442: 435: 405: 398: 379: 367: 360: 290: 283: 266: 252: 245: 226: 219: 205: 187: 183: 143: 140: 137: 134: 133: 100: 71:on Knowledge's 68: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2171: 2169: 2161: 2160: 2155: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1647: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1457: 1454: 1432: 1429: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1338: 1305: 1289: 1169: 1168: 1165: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 975: 972: 970: 968: 967: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 888: 887: 869: 866: 863: 825: 824: 823: 822: 788: 787: 781: 780: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 620: 616: 598: 597: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 545: 537: 533: 375: 374: 356: 353: 350: 347: 343: 342: 329: 328: 327: 324: 321: 318: 314: 307: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 260: 259: 218: 217:AFD candidate? 215: 204: 201: 182: 179: 176: 175: 172: 171: 168: 167: 160:Mid-importance 156: 150: 149: 147: 130:the discussion 116: 104: 103: 101:Mid‑importance 95: 83: 82: 76: 65: 51: 50: 43:the discussion 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2170: 2159: 2156: 2154: 2151: 2150: 2148: 2137: 2133: 2128: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2069: 2065: 2060: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2043: 2041: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2023: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1977: 1973: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1953: 1948: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1912: 1906: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1871: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1791: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1760: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1744: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1709: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1664:at least WWII 1661: 1657: 1653: 1645: 1631: 1627: 1622: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1556: 1554: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1534: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1465: 1455: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1430: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1418: 1409: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1339: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1306: 1304: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1267: 1262: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1214: 1209: 1207: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160:ideas are: 1159: 1149: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1135: 1130: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1063: 1053: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1001: 999: 993: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 973: 971: 966: 963: 958: 956: 949: 948: 947: 946: 942: 937: 924: 921: 916: 914: 907: 906: 905: 901: 897: 892: 891: 890: 889: 886: 883: 878: 876: 870: 867: 864: 861: 860: 859: 858: 854: 849: 842: 841: 837: 832: 821: 818: 813: 811: 805: 804: 803: 799: 795: 790: 789: 786: 783: 782: 779: 776: 771: 769: 762: 761: 748: 744: 739: 734: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 707: 704: 699: 697: 691: 683: 679: 674: 669: 668: 667: 663: 659: 654: 653: 652: 648: 643: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 630: 626: 621: 617: 614: 610: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 596: 593: 588: 586: 579: 578: 561: 557: 552: 546: 542: 538: 534: 532: 528: 523: 518: 514: 510: 509: 508: 505: 500: 498: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 484: 479: 473: 472: 471: 468: 463: 461: 455: 450: 449: 448: 445: 440: 438: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412: 411: 408: 403: 401: 394: 393: 392: 391: 387: 382: 373: 370: 365: 363: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 344: 341: 337: 333: 330: 325: 322: 319: 315: 311: 310: 308: 304: 303: 296: 293: 288: 286: 280: 279: 278: 274: 269: 264: 263: 262: 261: 258: 255: 250: 248: 241: 240: 239: 238: 234: 229: 223: 216: 214: 213: 210: 202: 200: 199: 195: 190: 180: 165: 161: 155: 152: 151: 148: 131: 127: 123: 122: 117: 114: 110: 109: 105: 99: 96: 93: 89: 84: 80: 74: 66: 62: 57: 56: 48: 44: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 2126: 2111:Novaseminary 2086: 2083: 2058: 2039: 2021: 2004:Novaseminary 1999: 1990: 1966: 1961: 1946: 1931:Novaseminary 1910: 1904: 1890:Novaseminary 1869: 1853:Novaseminary 1850: 1824: 1819: 1806:Andy Dingley 1789: 1775:Andy Dingley 1758: 1742: 1728:Novaseminary 1722:Unnecessary 1707: 1703: 1684: 1668:Novaseminary 1649: 1620: 1595:Novaseminary 1592: 1570: 1552: 1532: 1514: 1500:Novaseminary 1480: 1463: 1459: 1441: 1434: 1416: 1413: 1382: 1342: 1309: 1293: 1277: 1260: 1239: 1222: 1205: 1187: 1182: 1173: 1170: 1157: 1155: 1077: 1075: 1061: 1057: 1034: 997: 977: 969: 954: 935: 931: 912: 896:Andy Dingley 874: 847: 843: 830: 826: 809: 794:Andy Dingley 784: 767: 737: 695: 672: 658:Andy Dingley 641: 625:Andy Dingley 613:this article 612: 608: 584: 550: 540: 521: 496: 477: 459: 453: 436: 420:Andy Dingley 415: 399: 380: 376: 361: 332:Andy Dingley 284: 267: 246: 227: 224: 220: 206: 188: 184: 159: 135:Metalworking 126:Metalworking 119: 98:Metalworking 79:WikiProjects 46: 1652:this moment 1328:Wtshymanski 1171:Sincerely, 1019:Wtshymanski 981:Wtshymanski 2147:Categories 1886:WP:SUMMARY 1496:here it is 2127:North8000 2103:this edit 2087:North8000 2059:North8000 2022:North8000 1967:North8000 1964:article. 1947:North8000 1911:North8000 1870:North8000 1825:North8000 1790:North8000 1759:North8000 1743:North8000 1708:North8000 1685:North8000 1621:North8000 1571:North8000 1533:North8000 1515:North8000 1481:North8000 1464:North8000 1442:North8000 1417:North8000 1383:North8000 1343:North8000 1310:North8000 1294:North8000 1278:North8000 1261:North8000 1240:North8000 1223:North8000 1188:North8000 1174:North8000 1158:realistic 1062:North8000 1035:North8000 936:North8000 848:North8000 831:North8000 738:North8000 673:North8000 642:North8000 551:North8000 522:North8000 478:North8000 381:North8000 268:North8000 228:North8000 189:North8000 544:version. 313:flannel. 39:deletion 536:signal. 162:on the 69:C-class 2046:(talk) 2019:Cool. 1650:As of 1559:(talk) 1212:(talk) 1004:(talk) 961:(talk) 919:(talk) 881:(talk) 816:(talk) 774:(talk) 702:(talk) 591:(talk) 503:(talk) 466:(talk) 454:images 443:(talk) 406:(talk) 368:(talk) 291:(talk) 253:(talk) 75:scale. 1962:this 1905:could 1820:start 2132:talk 2115:talk 2092:talk 2064:talk 2040:Tony 2027:talk 2008:talk 2000:Done 1972:talk 1952:talk 1935:talk 1927:WP:N 1916:talk 1894:talk 1875:talk 1857:talk 1830:talk 1810:talk 1795:talk 1779:talk 1764:talk 1748:talk 1732:talk 1713:talk 1690:talk 1672:talk 1626:talk 1599:talk 1576:talk 1553:Tony 1538:talk 1520:talk 1504:talk 1486:talk 1469:talk 1447:talk 1422:talk 1388:talk 1348:talk 1332:talk 1326:. -- 1315:talk 1299:talk 1283:talk 1266:talk 1245:talk 1228:talk 1206:Tony 1193:talk 1183:this 1179:talk 1067:talk 1040:talk 1023:talk 1017:. -- 998:Tony 985:talk 955:Tony 941:talk 913:Tony 900:talk 875:Tony 853:talk 836:talk 810:Tony 798:talk 768:Tony 743:talk 696:Tony 678:talk 662:talk 647:talk 629:talk 585:Tony 556:talk 527:talk 497:Tony 483:talk 460:Tony 437:Tony 424:talk 416:does 400:Tony 386:talk 362:Tony 336:talk 285:Tony 273:talk 247:Tony 233:talk 209:Tony 203:Need 194:talk 47:keep 45:was 154:Mid 2149:: 2134:) 2117:) 2094:) 2066:) 2029:) 2010:) 1974:) 1954:) 1937:) 1929:. 1918:) 1896:) 1877:) 1859:) 1832:) 1812:) 1797:) 1781:) 1766:) 1750:) 1734:) 1715:) 1692:) 1674:) 1628:) 1601:) 1578:) 1540:) 1522:) 1506:) 1488:) 1471:) 1449:) 1424:) 1390:) 1350:) 1334:) 1317:) 1301:) 1285:) 1272:" 1268:) 1247:) 1230:) 1195:) 1069:) 1042:) 1025:) 987:) 943:) 902:) 855:) 838:) 800:) 745:) 680:) 664:) 649:) 631:) 609:is 558:) 541:is 529:) 485:) 426:) 418:. 388:) 338:) 275:) 235:) 196:) 2130:( 2113:( 2090:( 2062:( 2025:( 2006:( 1997:Y 1970:( 1950:( 1933:( 1914:( 1892:( 1873:( 1855:( 1828:( 1808:( 1793:( 1777:( 1762:( 1746:( 1730:( 1711:( 1688:( 1670:( 1624:( 1597:( 1574:( 1536:( 1518:( 1502:( 1484:( 1467:( 1445:( 1420:( 1386:( 1346:( 1330:( 1313:( 1297:( 1281:( 1264:( 1243:( 1226:( 1191:( 1177:( 1065:( 1038:( 1021:( 983:( 939:( 898:( 851:( 834:( 796:( 741:( 676:( 660:( 645:( 627:( 554:( 525:( 481:( 422:( 384:( 334:( 271:( 231:( 192:( 166:. 81:: 49:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index