Talk:The Marvels/Archive 1

3774:

eventually trigger some articles. At the moment, the movie is still part of a weird little culture war branch, with anti-fans on one side ("this movie must be called a bomb at all costs, because that proves Disney's strategy leads to failure, which proves that their progressive politics leads to failure, which proves Communism doesn't work, so you have to agree with me!") and wagon-circlers on the other ("this movie must not be called a bomb at all costs, because that cedes ground to the haters, which legitimises their grievances, which are adjacent to sexism, which is adjacent to traditional values, which is adjacent to authoritarianism, which is adjacent to fascism, which is adjacent to Nazism, and we all hate Nazis so you have to agree with me!"). You decide if it's worth your time being on one side of this polarization trap, or whether you are here to build an encyclopedia.

1422:

Lashana Lynch's stunt double, John Humber as Jude Law's assistant, Marie Fink as Cobie Smulder's stunt double, Simon Rhee as Randall Park's stunt double, and Sonny Louis as Mohan Kapoor's stunt double. This confirms all of these actors involvements and thinking about the placement of all of these actors and the context of the movie I would say they make a lot of sense in the movie. I would think this confirms their involvement (in the end we all know they'll be in the movie whether or not this is good enough "confirmation") but I was just wondering if putting them on page was a good idea.

499:. So, it seems that's what they're going for here, but we can wait for official confirmation. However, even after we get the confirmation, I think it's going to be too crowded to list all the 6 of them... which leads back to the discussion IronManCap referenced, where my preference would be to just say based on Marvel comics and that's it. Alternatively, we could also change this to just based on Captain Marvel and remove Carol Danvers... since all the other 2 characters and their alter egos also revolve around "Captain Marvel" in the comics. But yeah, for now let's wait. — 2994:- so we can't report these figures strictly verbatim as "the budget". We have to do a bit of thinking about what they mean and what information we are trying to discern. In our infobox template, we're after a specific thing: the production budget. That means how much money they paid to make the film. The source gives us two figures: spending, and net spending. Which one of those is the production budget? It's the first, because that's how much they paid to make the film. They paid the full $ 274.8m. The tax rebate came later. 1971: 2886:

suppliers. The tax relief is applied as a deduction against profit when calculating corporation tax, thus the film production company gets to keep more of the profit and thus are incentivised to produce films in the UK (which is presumably the purpose of the scheme). In Disney's case, they spent $ 274.8m to make this film. That's the actual budget of the film. The tax relief didn't reduce the budget, it just made the production company more profitable.

31: 3901:

those guides. it says multiple, so of course there had to be a 'discussion' on what exactly the word multiple means. you said it means 4 or more, then the next day on this talk page you seemed to imply that "minimum" of 4 was not enough. if the goalposts were not moved constantly i would have significantly less questions about said guidelines. a small level of consistency in the application of MOS Acclaimed would prove to be quite helpful

3789:

or standards on sources. it is entirely about the culture war and as you said "this movie must not be called a bomb at all costs, because that cedes ground to the haters, which legitimises their grievances". so a consensus was made to not call it a bomb for that singular reason. my problem with that is it flies in the face of reality, and i dislike the attempt to use wiki guidelines as cover for personal bias regarding the "culture war"

2871:

million to a special F/X company, including £1 million in VAT, and the Government rebate that money to your production, you have in fact only been charged £4 million: you have only paid £4 million, and the special F/X company has only received £4 million. All of this is incidental though: if different sources are reporting different figures we should include both of them, and clear about what they represent.

1627:"interpret" being the key word there. No one is suggesting that he might be filming SI but put "#TheMarvels" instead, what I am saying is that the the "#TheMarvels" post doesn't say anything about filming, and the other post only implies that he is starting filming and does not mention what project. Putting the two separate posts together to "interpret" his meaning and state that he is definitely filming 892: 3854:

acknowledge the sources or agree to even discuss calling it a bomb. trying to figure out, is 4 enough? because you told me that 4 reliable sources were needed per MOS Acclaimed, and the marvels has more than that amount. is that now not good enough? the movie has been out of the cinema for months and is already on disney+, exactly how much longer do we need to wait?

2184: 1879: 917: 2346:" before its mention of The Marvels. I think it is entirely possible for a slight delay. It is also noted of WBD's consideration of moving Dune Part Two (also a November release). I think we can include this report and what all the sides are saying on it, and if nothing comes from the internal review, we can easily remove it. 415:" worked, carrying over from the first film, but with this new title and reports indicating it is meant to represent all three confirmed characters thus far, Carol, Monica Rambeau, and Kamala Khan / Ms. Marvel, I think it would be best to find a way to credit each one. I'm not too sure if we should just have "Carol Danvers", " 3017:); 2) it doesn't explain where its figure comes from; 3) it doesn't describe their $ 220m figure as net, so it's an assumption by Knowledge editors that this is a net value, presumably because we suspect Variety got it from Forbes. Taken all together, this is probably best explained by Variety just being sloppy. 3915:

If you have questions about the MOS, then take it to that talk page, not here. I have said 4 is a good rule of thumb that has been used in practice across these articles. The consensus specifically highlighted ACCLAIMED and HEADLINES as to which sources to use and which ones did not fall in line with

3830:

You have missed the point entirely. My extreme examples were supposed to be lampoons of the noise going on around this film, not a description of Knowledge editors. Here we are striving to rise above this nonsense, not participate in it. Both of these “sides” are absurd in equal and opposite ways. If

3751:

the film has been out of the cinema for months and is already on disney+, exactly how much longer do we need to wait? how many more articles do you think will be written about a film that old? those sources are now writing about madame web, or dune. we have multiple reliable sources commenting on the

3736:

I don’t think academic sources are needed but I do think waiting is still the right answer. There’s nothing misleading or incorrect about the current wording. The sources from around the release date of a movie tend to run hot. We may get a different characterisation of this movie once we get sources

2885:

UK Film Tax Relief is on corporation tax, not VAT, and qualifying expenditure includes items like actors salaries which would not attract VAT. The expenditure on which tax relief is claimed is real money coming out of the wallet of the film production company and going into the wallets of the various

2855:

I removed it for the reasons in my comment above. The infobox is for simple headline facts, not an elaboration of the film’s finances (of which we only see a glimpse in reliable sources). The “gross” production budget is much more useful to the reader because it indicates the scale of the production.

2534:

The $ 220 million appears to be an estimate of the $ 219.8 million net budget Forbes reported rather than a new figure being reported, with Forbes' report being more accurate and reputable, especially when Variety itself also said it was $ 250 million. Marketing costs are not always factored into the

2427:

Just because a name was used in the comics does not mean it will be the same in the MCU, as this is an adaptation of decades of comics. The Spectrum alias has not been confirmed to be used for this iteration of the character in this adaptation, and toys cannot be used to support this as they can, and

2343:

Walt Disney Co. is reviewing its schedule of film releases through the rest of the year and may delay some titles because striking actors won’t help promote the pictures, according to people familiar with the matter. The discussions are at an early stage, but could impact films including Poor Things,

2287:

The most recent trailer and poster released a few days ago still has the November date. It’s releasing on that date so I do not think we should add it. Personally I believe the strikes will end by September/October once the studios cave and realize the damage it’s causing, which leaves plenty of time

875:

To avoid duplicate discussions, I think we should close this one but change the credits here to use the "based on Marvel Comics" credits used on the first Captain Marvel. That way we don't have to choose which one of the 3 characters and 3 alter egos we have to credit... and just stick to what Marvel

360:

promoting the film and mentioning who is featured in it does not translate to a synopsis/premise. Marvel.com did a description like that for all the films featured in the "Marvel Celebrates the Movies" video. They're not premises/synopsis. They're just promotional material. No rush, wait for the real

135:

But we just got an official announcement of the logo, title, and cast last month. We already know it's in development. I only included it because I felt the bit was partially notable, but have realized it really isn't as that's standard. A start date or expected time will be given sometime this year,

3706:

You could either read pages and pages of talk pages or. Tl dr, a group of editors decided to put the most sugar coated euphemism possible because they didn't want it called a bomb. For some reason this specific film has absolutely massive amount of discussion about how to phrase that i have not seen

3087:

I looked at the John Carter source and it very clearly distinguishes gross from net and reports them as two different metrics. We’re not obliged to report two metrics here. The template (assuming, for the moment, that the template reflects consensus) just asks for the production budget. Why don’t we

3072:

For the same reason we include the gross budget when the net budget is available. Inclusion in Knowledge is based on proportionate coverage by reliable sources, and both metrics are commonly reported. If you want an underlying rationale for why some sources favor one metric over the other then you'd

2870:

You wouldn't get a 99% tax rebate, because a film would not spend that much in tax. You can only recoup money you have been taxed through a tax rebate or tax credit. For example, the UK's Film Tax Relief scheme allows you claim back VAT provided your expenditure meets certain criteria. If you pay £5

406:

Given this film is now titled "The Marvels", and the current state of the article varies on who the leads are and what the "based on" credit is (without any current credits available), I think it is best to discuss what approach should be undertaken for these to remain consistent. Naturally, as this

91:

I didn't want to revert your most recent addition without discussing first, but I feel that this is a bit of a non-update. She says that she doesn't know when filming will start, and it will start when it is safe, both of which are things that generally don't need to be stated. Especially for a film

3900:

I have read those guides multiple times, while purposely vague they are quite easy to understand. the problem of course is that the consensus on this page completely ignores those guides. the reason i have to keep asking for explanation is that editors, such as yourself keep moving the goalposts on

3853:

the discussion was after it was out of the cinema, and those multiple reliable sources were either ignored or dismissed, as can be seen in this talk page. multiple times. when over and over those multiple reliable sources were brought at no point did anyone advocating for not calling it a bomb even

3788:

I applaud you for finally speaking the truth of the entire debate. none of this is about how many reliable sources are provided, and MOS acclaimed or WP Headline or NORUSH. this film is seen a singular statement on the "culture war". the entire debate has nothing to do with any wikipedia guidelines

3721:

The editors wanted to wait for more academic reliable sources to discuss and analyze the box office as a whole, rather than using the bare minimum of reliable sources available from only the first few months of its theatrical run. Your comments and assumptions are not really constructive, let alone

3406:

to prove something which cannot be verified yet as it is still far too early to determine what the actual loss figure is, what with all the financial analysis, marketing, etc. that goes into it. To reiterate, wait a few more months to a year to see if anything highly reputable comes along. There is

3002:

to give an account of the production company's financing and profitability. Why not? Because we can not achieve that purpose using only this tiny slice of information. Film financing and profitability is extremely complex, and the fact that we know about a tax rebate tells us nothing about the many

2904:

Regardless of how it is applied, it is applied and sources regularly deduct tax credits/rebates when presenting the cost of production. It is a matter of perspective as to whether a credit or a rebate should be counted as income against the film or deducted from the overall cost, and perspective is

669:

will be done here as well, at least for the time being. I see now that what we're trying to do here is basically the definition of SYNTH and OR. We should base ourselves off the credits and the credits don't credit any character, comic, or creator in particular. We should also include a hidden note

641:

for us to try work out what comic/character the films are based on when they are not officially based on any specific comic or creator's work. Using the 1967 line as a guide is even more dubious since there are two options from that year, and using the special thanks credit to make our own based on

614:

My main concern was about how the article previously listed Captain Marvel, Monica, and Ms. Marvel in the lede's based on credit but not in the infobox, which I have rectified. I'm honestly not too sure about what to do here. I have looked through the larger discussion, but feel for the time being,

3873:

and are just continuing something that is unlikely to change without new major points and sources to reference. It is generally advised to wait six months before trying to change an established consensus, so in that time, I would urge you to research potential sources and familiarize yourself with

3366:

to have lost Disney and Marvel Studios around $ 255 million looking exclusively at the figures from its theatrical run. Luckily, much of this revenue ought to be recouped in home entertainment sales - including digital and physical - along with streaming deals like the amount Disney pays itself to

3166:

I feel like more critic reviews should be featured in the Critical Response section, such as the positive reviews from IO9 and The Hollywood Reporter and the negative ones from The New York Post and The Telegraph. At the moment it feels a bit empty. if there's a reason it hasn't been done already,

3031:

Sources don't have to explain where they get their figures from. Trade press usually obtain their figures either through an examination of audited figures if available, or via a contact connected to the production. As for not describing the figure as a "net budget" this is splitting hairs now. The

2058:

We have no clue how Secret Invasion will go, given it was only the first of six episodes and honestly, anything can happen with these fictional stories. I don't think there is anything justifiable to hide or dispute Collider's casting reports, especially after last month's very brief talk. We know

273:

I'm still inclined to find an article we can use to confirm the notice. I feel if we were to go ahead and use this Reddit post as weak verification, a site might catch onto it, but I know the obstacles in using sites like Reddit as sources. We probably could just move it as we know what we already

2967:

At no point does the article use the term "actual budget". It states "This brought its net spending down to $ 219.8 million" which is line with Variety's figure. There is no valid reason to choose one figure over the other. The source provides both figures, and the net figure is reported in other

3868:

I'm not going to rehash statements which have already been said or further entertain this discussion. The ACCLAIMED MOS and HEADLINES policy has already been explained to you and the consensus has already been established and implemented. If you want to be constructive and help, then please find

3567:

Good point. In this situation, the odd unexpected financial updates occurred on older films as well (long after their theatrical run had ended), and each of those would have benefited from an archived citation. But generally you are spot on. Archived snapshots are a waste of time during a film's

2810:

Why are we reporting the “net” at all? I would have thought readers are most interested in the production budget, since it helps contextualise the scale of the production effort. The existence of a tax rebate changes nothing about how much money was spent on production, and the terms “gross” and

2445:

would apply here. Is it probably extremely likely that she goes by Spectrum? Yes. Has there been reliable sources outside of merchandising/toys confirming this? No. All the recent marketing material and interviews have not confirmed this for us, and we only know it's a possibility because of the

3920:" is utterly false. The bomb information is in the article in the box office section and is attributed to three reliable sources that fall within those guidelines, as the others were deemed not to. I'm not saying 4 is a must have or the definitive minimum, though it is more preferred and a good 2659:

The $ 130 million is not the full budget, and it was removed from the Vanity Fair piece shortly after publication, instead opting to only state it was budgeted more than A Wrinkle in Time. The exact budget won't be known likely until closer to release, and it has been removed from this article.

1421:

There are a few cast members who have been subtly revealed through IMDB recently: namely Lashana Lynch (Maria Rambeau), Jude Law (Yon-Rogg), Cobie Smulders (Maria Hill), Randall Park (Jimmy Woo), and Mohan Kapoor (Yusuf Khan from the upcoming Ms. Marvel series) - on IMDB Thom Jones is listed as

3803:

No one on here is knowingly giving into a nonsensical "culture war" and, from what I can tell in the discussion, most of the editors just want more accurate resources to analyze the box office that have had enough time to shift away from all of this bullshit, and are not engaging in any way of

3773:

Articles about movies written around the time of release suffer from hype/hate bias, and particularly this one. The passage of time may serve to turn the heat down and allow a more objective retrospective characterisation of the film. We haven't even had final financials, so I'd expect that to

3524:. Some algorithm or formula was probably having issues and has since been fixed. Not sure if it's been fixed across the board, but I also don't think this is the first time that's happened. Perhaps moving forward we should capture an archived version of the page and include it in the citation. 2268:(limited access) is reporting insiders are saying Disney may delay some of their remaining 2023 releases because of the strikes and not having cast to promote them, but others are saying The Marvels is too far along in its marketing and won't be pushed. Should we include this at all? Here's 807:

comic book character. Now that's entirely different to taking a credit that just says "Based on the Marvel Comics", then going to the Press Kit, seeing it specifies a year, then seeing that the two creators of the comic book character were given a Special Thanks credit and

3146:

The Article lists two sources for the opening weekend total. But one source puts the international total at $ 63.3 million, while the other source puts it at $ 41.5 million. That's a little too large a number to just be a rounding error. Can someone explain what gives?

2889:

So this isn't a case of different sources reporting two different figures for the budget. One figure ($ 274.8m) is the actual budget, the other figure ($ 219.8) is a bit of armchair-accountancy to inform some rough reckoning of whether the film will be commercial success.

355:

Adding this here, just in case someone else tries to add it back because some site called it a "synopsis" and others ran with it. Please note that a synopsis or premise is usually a summary of what happens in the film. It's a high level summary of the plot. An article

3367:

put its movies on Disney+. Looking at the 2022 MCU movies (the last year for which the profit and loss data is currently available), Deadline reported home entertainment and streaming totals ranged between Thor 4's $ 300 million and Doctor Strange 2's $ 340 million.

3924:, though more would be preferred and can be added should they become available and meet ACCLAIMED and HEADLINES. Rather than trying to call out something that isn't entirely true and in a manner that hasn't been quite constructive, you can try and help 3752:

marvels being a bomb after it was no longer in cinema. exactly what do you think is going to be written or going to change at this point? for months the default response has been "you just need to wait longer", exactly how much waiting is needed?

650:

at the other discussion is to take all the guessing out and just say "Based on the Marvel Comics" since that is what it says onscreen. If consensus agrees then I think we should do the same here until we get the official credits for this film. -

3369:

Only time will tell if The Marvels' at-home arrival can compensate for a disappointing theatrical haul, but these figures could indicate Marvel Studios may still be able to turn a small profit or at least break even on its $ 219.8 million

2811:“net” are more than a little ambiguous here. There are many cost and revenue line items that the film’s finances could be gross of or net of. For example, a budget figure might be gross of marketing costs. Why single out this tax rebate? 1930:

used "mutation" which is just a different way of saying she's a mutant. In addition to the X-Men 97 theme song, the cast and crew interviews have pretty much confirmed she's a mutant. So, we don't need to beat around the bush about it. —

2997:

Going back to my first comment on this matter, we do have a valid reason to prefer "spending" instead of "net spending": because the purpose of including the budget at all is to give the reader a sense of the scale of the production -

160:

Filming is supposed to start the week of April 12, and is prominently stated in the infobox on the top of the page. If we don't get a secondary source on this by tomorrow, are we still scheduled to move the page to the mainspace? -

3003:

other factors that go into determining a film's profitability - and to show "gross" and "net" as we currently do is highly likely to mislead the reader, because we haven't grossed up or netted down any of those other factors. It's

1476:

provides SLJ's casting as a brief mention in a box that is not part of the article, which provides no additional context or reasoning for the casting, so it is likely based on his Insta post, which we are holding off on per

3454:

The box office totals in the article don't match the source (Box Office Mojo). Is there a good reason for this, or perhaps has BOM updated totals from initial estimates, but the article hasn't been correspondingly updated?

3126:. It is not for editors to decide which figure is "more useful" or more correct. The net figure is commonly reported by reliable sources because this is actually closest to the final expenditure on the film's production. 3538:

Huh. Thanks for letting us know. I know there is an archive option for the cite BOM temp, though I haven't seen it used as frequently as it should across these film articles. This might be enough incentive to do so.

2344:

Next Goal Wins, Wish and Magazine Dreams, which are all slated for release this year. Any changes will depend on the outcome of the review, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing internal matters.

1594:

He made one post suggesting that he was about to start filming, and one post tagged "#TheMarvels". I think it is a stretch to say that this is confirmation, even if a decent source is doing the stretching for us. -

3615:

The Marvels failed to surpass its budget and is the lowest performing MCU movie. Surely given the financial definition of "box office disaster" that Knowledge uses for Madame Web, that would be applicable here.

3324:, 72 hours of semi-protection has been applied to the Talk page due to a volume of repetitive commentary that risks overwhelming it and making orderly discussion impossible. Thank you for your understanding. 2472:

I feel it is important to note that while the original budget when the film was scheduled for a July 2022 release was $ 274.8 gross, with $ 219.8m after UK tax write-offs, the entire film has been reshot

2059:

The Marvels is set after SI, and that Skrulls can impersonate anyone. This is a let's wait and see situation, and there doesn't seem to be anything definitive to counter the casting report at this time.

243:

and Warbird II Productions, the respective working title and production for this film, in Jersey City from April 9 for filming in green screen plates for one day. I haven't found an article on this yet.

738:

as sources aren't being combined to reach the conclusion. If the exact character creators are stated in the credits, then per convention for various different comic-based film articles and consensus at

2428:

have a tendency to, be incorrect and not reflective of what is in a finished film. Regardless, a source is still required to verify any such additions, and not just what you think should be included.

1908:

The Ms. Marvel series, noticeably, avoided the word mutant. They referred to any character the comics would call mutant as the established MCU "enhanced" Why is she called a mutant in this article?

598:

I'll just add that both Gene Golan and Roy Thomas received a Special Thanks credit, as can be seen on page XI (page 13 in the .PDF file), to serve as back-up for including those names in particular. —

295:

I think we should go ahead with the move, as it doesn't seem any new articles are popping up on this. We know the source we have is true per the Reddit post, so I say that's safe enough for a move.

2710:

Except that’s not accounting for UK subsidiary, so the real budget is $ 219.8 million, which a lot of media are beginning to correct themselves to report this figure when taking that into account.

783:

That's just like putting two and two together, especially if it lines up exactly with the creator of the comic book character that's at the center of the film. If you look at the credits of, e.g.

3187: 3168: 2560: 2109:

I think we should note that she was announced to be reprising her role here and that she denies it. We shouldn't remove it because her simply lying or being coy in order to hide any spoilers for

1432: 3770:. It's informal, fuzzy, and IMHO not very encyclopedic. The only reason we would normally entertain it is if we see a great deal of weight in the sources pointing towards labelling it this way. 3239:, even if we don't see her destroy it in the 2019 film. I reworded the opening sentence of the plot summary to clarify this, but it may be better leave the note out to avoid further confusion. 2341:

I wouldn't rule out a potential delay, and some industry sources have mentioned a theoretical Sep/Oct end to the strikes, although that should not sway what we include here. Bloomberg reports "

3804:

personal biases as you seem to be assuming here. The policies and guidelines are in place specifically so we have a groundwork to go off of when such material gets heated or disputed, not to "

3620: 3285:

discusses the problems this production had, including the need for reshoots—but I don't see any of this reflected in our article. Oversight? Or has someone been "tidying it up", soda speak? –

2481: 1379: 259:

So seeing that, even though we can't use it, it does confirm the sourcing we have in article. Should we proceed with moving, or wait until we possibly get something to confirm this notice? -

2495:

Yet again, Forbes' report on the budget is more accurate than Variety's, which is an estimate. We do not know the extent of the reshoots, so we cannot assume their impact on the production.

1060:: This does seem to be the primary topic, but there are also a lot of things with the same or similar name at the disambig page in addition to the one article and redirect that you noted. - 1789: 2011:

I have not seen any other trades report on or verify this, and I was partially skeptical in including them. Then again, we have seen castings only included in weird press releases before.

1821: 1378:

Hi there, Ive noticed that Samuel L Jackson as Nick Fury is removed from the cast list. Isn't he supposed to be in the Marvels or was he talking about filming the Secret Invasion TV Show?

2905:

for reliable sources to determine, not us as editors. It would become very difficult (and inconsistent) for Knowledge to report film finance if we limited ourselves to one or the other.

274:

have in the article can be verified by this, and if an article is made on it after the fact, we can always add that into here. So, I support a move to the mainspace with this in mind.

2919:

In this case, the reliable source we are using is completely clear that $ 274.8m is the actual budget. Where are the reliable sources claiming anything else as the actual budget?

2151:

Okay. Now that there is some denial on Smulders' part, I would be fine with hiding it from cast prose here and at Phase Five, and we could note the report and her denial in Post.

547:

series by Roy Thomas and Gene Colan, both which debuted in 1967. So for now in both articles, we could simply put based on Marvel Comics by Stan Lee, Gene Colan, and Roy Thomas.--

2616:

and follows the other parameters there, such an addition could work if deemed beneficial to a readers' basic understanding of the plot, though it may just be a character beat.

1351:- this is clearly the primary subject of the topic and the other articles lack enough significance & notability as explained in the nom and per Facu-el Millo's analysis. — 525: 3553:

I think we usually avoid archives for box office and other things that are constantly changing, but we should be fine to add an archive once the theatrical run is done. -

477:

I agree with IronManCap, leave it as it is until we have reliable sources that say different. Many superhero films feature other heroes and not every creator is credited.—

1996:

Has any other publication made mention of these actors, particularly Smulders and Park? Just feels a bit odd since there as no previous indication they'd be involved. -

703:

by..." would do, with a hidden note to clarify why a particular character isn't included in that parameter. This would mean adjusting the leads of the articles as well.

1861:

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.

785: 1176:, which translates to "The Wonders of Creatures and the Marvels of Creation", so there's barely any reason for it to be in the disambiguation page in the first place; 3619:

Why isn't The Marvels also labelled as a Box Office Disaster considering it lost the studio money, failed to break-even and did not even surpass its initial budget?

2794:

Variety and other mainstream trades tend to report those figures that are usually rounded to a degree and do not always reflect what the final costs actually are.

2640:

Many sources are reporting the $ 130 million budget, but in April Forbes said that was the budget only for the first two months of filming, not the entire movie:

1635:. We need a source stating that information, and if the only sources that we have are basing their information on the same two posts then it is still WP:SYNTH. - 1000: 2762:

Yup, both should remain in the article. Disney spent the full $ 274.8 million, though was essentially reimbursed $ 55 million. The $ 274.8 was never incorrect.

3670:

Unconstructive, disruptive comments and accusations of other editors' intents and complains against the consensus. Ranting editor does not seem to be here to

2412:

I know "Spectrum" is yet to be used as Monica's hero name in the MCU, but that's what she's called in the comics. I think therefore that should be reflected.

3882:

rather than asking other editors to explain things for you. It is not our responsibility to hand you everything. If you want to help, then please do so in a

3488:

It appears that this figure was given by BOM which then retracted it, likely as an overage of the actual gross, which tends to happen with these sites. Now,

2244:

Only McDonnell and DaCosta and Karasik are credited on the poster released recently. Something must have happened with Wells's contributions to the script. -

1748: 876:

used in the first film. So, if no opposition, we should change this to "based on Marvel Comics" while we try to reach a consensus for the rest of the MCU. —

3201:

In the old parlance of 'column inhces' there's really only one critical view given here which leads me to believe that's pro-Disney editorialising going on

2265: 1653:. I was suggesting using a single source (CinemaBlend) for this info, but I agree with the rationale of waiting for more explicit confirmation nonetheless. 1038:

until the film name came along. The other in the disambiguation is a redirect to the author's article. Also, this page receives 99 percent of the pageviews

1484:

As for the Khan family, the post is from a low-profile, unverified account, so cannot be counted as a reliable source, whilst the picture is simply of the

107:

Ah, that's true. I just thought some filming bit would be notable, but looking at it again, it's really not much of an update as you said. I'll revert it.

2986:

It doesn't call either $ 274.8m or $ 219.8 "the budget" or "the gross budget" or "the net budget". It describes those two different figures as spending -

2598:

I expanded the section. I'm mulling over whether I should put in the memory flashback of Maria, since it would provide context for the mid-credits scene.

3010:

I could understand reporting a "net" figure if that's all sources provide, but I can see no upside to including "net" when "gross" is readily available.

2641: 2212:, which could be them going off of the Collider report. Given the conflicting reports, I still think it is fine to remain hidden until we are certain. 1553: 795: 3464:

The Marvels grossed $ 84.5 million in the United States and Canada, and $ 121.5 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $ 206 million.

3037: 3869:

updated reliable sources that attribute to it being a bomb, rather than criticizing other editors and making assumptions, which do not appear to be

2934: 2517: 1752: 3398:

As I noted in that discussion, The Direct, as a fan site/blog, is an unreliable source and not a reputable source for box office information. See

3278: 1779: 1511:, reliable sources are split on what project SLJ means by his Instagram post. Outside of the shirt he is wearing, nothing is indicating it is for 2073:

Also, Hill's appearance in this film could be through in-universe video footage, a flashback, etc. It's too early to make a presumption on this.

1082:

said below, almost all of the other points on the disambig page are either stubs, redirects, or completely differently named articles. Regarding

1811: 1609:

Well we have several RS that interpret this as him appearing in the film, and I don't see why he would tag "#TheMarvels" if the filming was for

1508: 1398: 2777: 2205: 3375: 699:

If the credited creators exactly match up with the creators of a particular character or comic book, we can add that. If not, just "based on

984:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

2938: 2841: 2781: 2749: 2693: 2679: 2645: 2521: 3191: 3172: 2564: 1436: 3624: 3007:. Never mind that it's extra clutter in the infobox, which is supposed to be for concise summarised information, not trivial details. 2485: 1383: 236: 2720: 2331: 2308:

And the Bloomberg article itself admits some are too far into their marketing to be changed, such as Haunted Mansion and this film:

2298: 1915: 2856:

Imagine a $ 100m film was produced in a country with a 99% tax rebate on film spending. It’s still a $ 100m film, not a $ 1m film.

1040:] against the band and the disambiguation, even accounting for the time before the film name was even announced. Just my thoughts. 3183: 3925: 3671: 2092: 2088: 646:. Not to mention the first film has multiple Captain Marvel's in it and they have different comic creators. My suggestion for 3432: 3403: 2745: 408: 191: 721:

is. You shouldn't combine things from different sources or prior knowledge to make a conclusion that isn't in the source. —

324: 3870: 2840:

The net was removed from the infobox, but I don't see any consensus here or in the other pages where the net was removed--

2388:

delayed, than that Bloomberg report could be worth including, though if it retains its release, it would not be relevant.

1951: 1369:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1339: 740: 634: 454: 2376:

That strike lasted 3 months from November '07 to February '08. It is not worth speculating the timeline of the strike at

1387: 457:. I think it's best to leave this how it is for now, considering this has been billed and marketed as a direct sequel to 204:

We need a source to state it has begun filming in order to move it to the mainspace, or if a new filming start is given.

766: 1425:

I need help sourcing (IMDB cast list) and I'm not sure if the order is right but I just thought I would let you know!

1180: 3223:

I've noticed that the plot summary has a note explaining that the fall of the Supreme Intelligence was "depicted in

2642:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinereid/2023/04/11/disneys-bill-for-the-marvels-came-to-130-million-two-years-ago/

2319:, a superhero film that’s likely to be the biggest picture still on the calendar, saying it’s scheduled for Nov. 10. 615:

just leaving Carol/Captain Marvel should suffice until/if anything changes, as this is currently being billed as a

187: 71: 66: 38: 3612:

Madame Web ends its opening by stating it is a "box-office disaster" because it's only just surpassed its budget.

1763:

article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

3836: 3779: 3742: 3506:

Hmm, it appears BOM had an error and it has now gone back to listing the 206 figure. I have restored it as such.

3093: 3063: 3022: 2956: 2924: 2895: 2861: 2816: 2518:

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/the-marvels-box-office-opening-weekend-projections-worst-mcu-debut-1235783293/

975: 121:

For what its worth, I didn't think it was necessary to remove, as it is still a sign it is still in development.

92:

where we have had such recent updates and don't really need an update to show that it is still in development. -

3933: 3891: 3821: 3727: 3683: 3587: 3544: 3511: 3497: 3416: 3350: 2799: 2767: 2735: 2701: 2665: 2621: 2540: 2500: 2433: 2393: 2367: 2351: 2217: 2195: 2156: 2078: 2064: 2016: 1981: 1759:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for 1335: 1287: 1159: 1155: 1142: 624: 589: 552: 482: 436: 332: 300: 279: 249: 218:

It is also only second unit filming, so a new source might be harder to come by, but it won't be impossible. -

209: 141: 112: 3044:

as the "cost". Fine, you have a different perspective, but it does not usurp those found in reliable sources.

743:

we should include that. If the creators in the credits are different from the character's creators, then it's

3014: 2942: 2845: 2785: 2753: 2683: 2649: 2525: 3657: 3032:

expenditure on production costs is the production budget i.e. what the film cost to make. In the context of

2172: 2124: 1893: 1563: 1453: 1236: 1196: 957: 905: 823: 677: 605: 575: 515: 3290: 2251: 2048: 2038: 1816: 1805: 1773: 1112: 1046: 1026:– This might seem to be too premature, but this film seems to be the primary topic for this article name, 357: 2381: 3906: 3859: 3794: 3757: 3712: 3558: 3470:

All Releases DOMESTIC (43.3%) $ 84,500,223 INTERNATIONAL (56.7%) $ 110,663,691 WORLDWIDE $ 195,163,914

3389: 3305: 3263: 3131: 3123: 3078: 3049: 2977: 2910: 2876: 2455: 2277: 2142: 2100: 2001: 1919: 1727: 1713: 1698: 1640: 1600: 1524: 1270: 1065: 985: 947: 656: 459: 314: 264: 223: 97: 500: 3902: 3855: 3808:" as you have falsely accused without evidence. Making such claims is not helping the constructive or 3790: 3766:

Until some sources come up that warrant changing the article. The term "bomb" is ultimately a kind of

3753: 3708: 3127: 3074: 3045: 2973: 2906: 2872: 1572:

I think the most solid sourcing for including SLJ in the cast list would actually be that CB article.

1173: 3832: 3775: 3738: 3089: 3059: 3018: 2952: 2920: 2891: 2857: 2812: 1911: 1658: 1618: 1585: 1543: 1493: 1428: 1406: 1300: 1253: 1166: 929: 841: 774: 756: 708: 468: 195: 3474: 2133:

Usually I would agree, but given there was some uncertainty around the initial announcement (in the

3929: 3887: 3879: 3817: 3723: 3679: 3583: 3540: 3507: 3493: 3478: 3412: 3346: 3329: 3209: 3148: 2795: 2763: 2731: 2697: 2661: 2617: 2582: 2536: 2511: 2496: 2480:

As such it's completely infeasible for the $ 219.8m net budget to be its actual budget as of 2023.

2429: 2389: 2363: 2347: 2288:

for marketing normally with press and the cast, which is likely what Marvel Studios is betting on.

2213: 2191: 2152: 2074: 2060: 2031:

Should Hill still be listed as appearing in the movie after the first episode of Secret Invasion? -

2012: 1977: 1865: 1577: 1469: 1283: 988:

after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

769:, where the credits' wording has been written out as well as what we should include for each film. 744: 735: 718: 620: 585: 563: 548: 478: 448: 432: 393: 328: 296: 275: 245: 205: 166: 137: 126: 108: 86: 3492:

actually lists a higher gross than what BOM does, so I will implement that as the correct figure.

686:

I agree, 100%. It really is OR. So, yeah I'm in favor of simply using "based on Marvel Comics". —

3653: 3643: 3573: 3529: 3440: 3244: 3152: 2613: 2603: 2167: 2119: 1959: 1888: 1558: 1449: 1316: 1232: 1191: 1134: 1130: 1079: 1031: 1030:

in comparison with the other articles. It is worth noting the only other article with this name,

1019: 952: 900: 833: 818: 672: 600: 570: 511: 389: 183: 1970: 1689:

specific social media posts, should we reconsider the ones back in August to actually being for

1535: 3928:(which is always changing and improving) and gather more sources to see if they would qualify. 3489: 1160:

Sloan Digital Sky Survey#Multi-object APO Radial Velocity Exoplanet Large-area Survey (MARVELS)

3286: 2477:

and that's not factoring in the additional costs of insuring the film throughout the delays.

2417: 2246: 2043: 2033: 1837: 1784: 1217: 1107: 1095: 1041: 3186:

sorry just realised the Hollywood Reporter's one is already there. the others are not though

2968:

sources. Net budgets are widely reported metrics in the trade press. If it's good enough for

2696:, which is far more realistic than the figure sites misinterpreted and were throwing around. 3554: 3408: 3385: 3301: 3259: 2713: 2451: 2447: 2324: 2291: 2273: 2138: 2096: 1997: 1963: 1932: 1723: 1709: 1694: 1636: 1596: 1573: 1520: 1352: 1266: 1061: 877: 722: 687: 652: 401: 385: 381: 362: 310: 290: 260: 219: 93: 47: 17: 3431:

Just as an FYI, expect the budget to rise again around September 2024, as this is when the

3343: 510:

I agree that we simply state it's based on Captain Marvel (Carol Danvers) and that's it. —

3883: 3809: 3767: 3399: 3004: 1853: 1654: 1650: 1632: 1614: 1581: 1539: 1489: 1402: 1249: 925: 837: 770: 752: 704: 643: 464: 3013:

The Variety source is problematic for three reasons: 1) a later articles contradicts it (

2744:

I added both (gross and net) in the infobox, like in the others MCU movies, for example

3675: 3325: 3321: 3205: 3204:

It's not making any money so a consensus based on that alone shows it's not well liked

2575: 2384:. None of that chatter holds a bearing currently on this article, however. If the film 2269: 1862: 1812:"Marvel Unveils Post-'Endgame' Slate with 'Eternals', 'Shang-Chi' and Multiple Sequels" 1445: 1138: 1009: 416: 397: 162: 122: 2362:

I know it is a belief, but wouldn't the strike last almost a year like 2007-2008 one?

670:

that clarifies why we're not putting anything more specific in the field, of course. —

3921: 3875: 3806:

attempt to use wiki guidelines as cover for personal bias regarding the "culture war"

3639: 3569: 3525: 3436: 3240: 2599: 2442: 1955: 1780:"Here are all the Marvel shows coming to Disney+, from 'Ms. Marvel' to 'Moon Knight'" 1312: 1091: 700: 412: 177: 3227:(2019)". However, the destruction of that entity is only depicted via flashback in 2413: 1213: 748: 638: 2382:

studio/streamer representatives have expressed a desire to return to talks over it

3361: 3937: 3910: 3895: 3863: 3840: 3825: 3812:

nature of the discussion process, and you have already been warned at your talk

3798: 3783: 3761: 3746: 3731: 3716: 3687: 3661: 3647: 3628: 3591: 3577: 3562: 3548: 3533: 3515: 3501: 3482: 3444: 3420: 3393: 3354: 3333: 3309: 3294: 3267: 3248: 3213: 3195: 3176: 3156: 3135: 3097: 3082: 3067: 3058:

What is the purpose of including a net budget when a gross budget is available?

3053: 3026: 2981: 2960: 2946: 2928: 2914: 2899: 2880: 2865: 2849: 2820: 2803: 2789: 2771: 2757: 2739: 2725: 2705: 2687: 2669: 2653: 2625: 2607: 2589: 2568: 2544: 2529: 2504: 2489: 2459: 2437: 2421: 2397: 2371: 2355: 2336: 2303: 2281: 2255: 2221: 2199: 2176: 2160: 2146: 2128: 2104: 2082: 2068: 2052: 2020: 2005: 1985: 1939: 1897: 1870: 1756: 1741: 1731: 1717: 1702: 1662: 1644: 1622: 1604: 1589: 1567: 1547: 1528: 1497: 1457: 1410: 1359: 1343: 1320: 1303: 1291: 1274: 1257: 1240: 1223: 1200: 1117: 1087: 1069: 1051: 1023: 1013: 961: 933: 909: 884: 845: 827: 778: 760: 729: 712: 694: 681: 660: 628: 609: 593: 579: 556: 519: 486: 472: 440: 420: 369: 336: 318: 304: 283: 268: 253: 227: 213: 199: 170: 145: 130: 116: 101: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3088:

report the metric that corresponds most closely to what the template asks for?

2951:

That article doesn't mention tax relief or gross or net or anything like that.

2315:

is scheduled to hit theaters July 28. Last week, Disney released a trailer for

1751:

to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for

1189:

None of these are even close to being as notable as this film for this title. —

1485: 1103: 751:

to include a particular character, which is where hidden notes come in handy.

424: 323:

Well, I contacted Comicbook.com about this info last week, and they published

1488:

and provides no indication that the user undertook filming for this project.

3258:(with a source), rather than trying to have the "as depicted in" wording. - 2692:

And now, just to state here, Disney revealed the actual budget clocks in at

1519:. See the draft talk discussion for more and to join in the conversation. - 1169:, which is an even shorter stub that's one line long and has two references; 1034:(which is a stub and rarely received any pageviews before), was just called 1005: 2210:

Her seventh movie appearance is reportedly coming in November’s The Marvels

2137:

section above) I thought we may want to consider removing that for now. -

2535:

overall budget of films, so we would not add 100 to any of the budgets.

1649:

Obviously, we cannot put two sources together to reach a conclusion per

946:

There's a discussion involving this and many other MCU film articles at

3380: 1151: 1083: 948:

Talk:Loki (TV series)#"Featuring" vs "Based on" in the opening sentence

3254:

I have adjusted the note so it says the flashback happened soon after

537:

Based on the beloved Marvel comic-book series, first published in 1967

463:. If Marvel confirms this is a team-oriented film we can change this. 1099: 3886:

manner. If not, then you don't have to respond, and neither do we.

3816:

times about making such assumptions of other editors on this talk.

3707:

in any other film page ever. Read the talk page it's quite amusing

1417:

Other Cast Members (Maria Rambeau, Yon-Rogg, Maria Hill, Jimmy Woo)

1401:

about this. We have agreed to wait for more explicit confirmation.

2113:

is just as likely, if not more, than reports of her appearance in

665:

I think it's already agreed upon that whatever we decide to do at

3638:, and it shouldn't have been without citing reliable sources. -- 327:

on it today. So, I've added that info to the relevant articles.

309:

As long as no one else objects, then sure, we could move it. -

2311:

Some films may be too far along in their marketing to change.

2165:

I hadn't realized that. I agree then with hiding it for now. —

453:

the criteria for 'based on' is currently being reevaluated at

25: 2574:

Because very few people other than critics have seen it yet.

3374:". Concerns about this source have also been raised over at 803:

novel, just like "the Marvel Comic" is clearly referring to

1133:, which is a very short stub with only two references, and 3831:

you can only see fault in one, you might be on the other.

3360:

More context from that source (I've added the emphasis): "

1755:

in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of

1534:

New find: Jackson tags "#TheMarvels" in his latest tweet

1328:

per nom El Millo. No page directly relating to the word "

799:

clearly isn't SYNTH, "the novel" is clearly referring to

3520:

A lot of films were affected by this "error", including

3402:

for a list of what is and is not reliable. This is just

2516:

the $ 220 million budget was confirmed also by Variety:

1708:

I think so, but is there a good source for us to use? -

1507:

Just adding a note here as well as the one happening at

1472:'s revert of the additions of Fury and the Khan family: 765:

An example of what I mean is adamstom.97's additions to

176:

No, unfortunately, but I would still suggest waiting. ~

3635: 2612:

As long as the section falls between 400-700 words per

3918:

consensus on this page completely ignores those guides

3634:

It has been removed. The unsourced claim was added in

1373: 3142:

International Box office discrepancy between sources.

2992:

This brought its net spending down to $ 219.8 million

1722:

I believe the CinemaBlend source above could work. -

407:

started off as "Captain Marvel 2", the crediting of "

950:

that may be of interest of watchers of this page. —

3376:Talk:List of biggest box-office bombs#The Marvels 942:"Featuring" vs "Based on" in the opening sentence 3122:I have restored it. Cherry-picking goes against 2309: 3231:itself. That flashback follows up on Danvers' 2520:with another $ 100 million for the promotion-- 2272:'s article reporting on Bloomberg's report. - 2087:Smulders denies she will be in this film with 1852:timestamp mismatch; July 21, 2019 suggested ( 8: 3345:This source puts loss at around 255 million. 2972:I don't see any reason to preclude it here. 1749:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting 1374:Isn't Nick Fury supposed to be in the movie? 1129:: The only articles that share the name are 1210:Per nom. Seems like the primary topic here. 836:, you explained it much better than I did. 812:take that to justify crediting them in the 136:so it really doesn't provide anything new. 3694:The following discussion has been closed. 3666: 1909: 1810:Couch, Aaron; Kit, Borys (July 20, 2019). 1515:, but it also isn't explicitly indicating 1426: 974:The following is a closed discussion of a 3040:. This figure is further corroborated by 2240:Zeb Wells not credited with recent poster 1468:Just noting here some likely reasons for 3916:those were removed, so the notion that " 3300:It is in the post-production section. - 1448:, and those castings are not confirmed. 1090:is a big enough distinction, similar to 1086:, I think that having "The" in front of 796:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone 786:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone 423:" or also include "Captain Marvel" and " 3917: 3805: 3316:Temporary semi-protection of Talk page 3188:2A02:C7C:A4B6:1A00:5422:2760:981E:CB69 3184:2A02:C7C:A4B6:1A00:5422:2760:981E:CB69 3169:2A02:C7C:A4B6:1A00:5422:2760:981E:CB69 2991: 2987: 2561:2600:1004:B30B:D052:B4EA:597:5122:36C0 2342: 2209: 2134: 1954:that Zawe Ashton is playing Dar-Benn. 1849: 1845: 1835: 1538:. This seems like confirmation to me. 1509:Draft talk:Secret Invasion (TV series) 1433:2601:98a:4300:9230:4549:e20f:67af:9df9 1399:Draft talk:Secret Invasion (TV series) 1154:, which is a redirect to a section of 813: 790: 536: 532: 427:", as we do for the Ant-Man films and 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3621:2A00:23C7:812:3A01:307E:D00:36D1:224C 2776:Now Variety says 250 million dollars 2482:2A00:23C7:80B:7901:CEB:2C27:4638:AE2B 1380:2A02:C7E:1814:6B00:3DA4:B566:9D67:403 7: 3235:to stop the Supreme Intelligence in 1792:from the original on August 24, 2019 993:The result of the move request was: 3219:Plot summary - Supreme Intelligence 2468:Citation needed for outdated budget 3450:Box Office Mojo Source discrepancy 3073:need to put the question to them. 1824:from the original on July 20, 2019 1478: 1464:Why recent additions were reverted 1394: 791:Based on the novel by J.K. Rowling 543:by Stan Lee and Gene Colan or the 24: 429:The Falcon and the Winter Soldier 3162:are there enough critic reviews? 2933:Variety says that the budget is 2182: 1969: 1877: 1778:Brown, Tracy (August 23, 2019). 1365:The discussion above is closed. 915: 890: 29: 3652:Two wrongs don't make a right. 431:, as that would be a bit much. 2772:22:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC) 2758:22:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC) 2746:Guardians of the Galaxy (film) 2740:21:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC) 2726:18:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC) 2706:17:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC) 2688:21:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC) 2670:21:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC) 2654:20:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC) 2460:16:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC) 2438:17:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC) 2422:17:42, 15 September 2023 (UTC) 2408:use of "Spectrum" in cast list 1940:00:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC) 1439:) 01:52, 29 August, 2021 (UTC) 1186:, which isn't even a redirect. 1001:closed by non-admin page mover 1: 3662:19:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC) 3648:21:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 3629:21:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 3249:19:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC) 3196:21:49, 12 November 2023 (UTC) 3177:21:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC) 3157:05:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC) 3136:12:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 3098:09:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 3083:08:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 3068:07:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 3054:05:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 3038:described as the "net budget" 3027:21:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2982:16:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2961:16:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2947:16:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2929:15:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2915:14:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2900:14:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2881:12:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2866:11:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 2850:11:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 1498:14:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC) 1311:per nom and Facu-el Millo. -- 1265:per nom and Facu-el Millo. - 1141:. At the disambiguation page 741:Talk:The Avengers (2012 film) 635:Talk:The Avengers (2012 film) 491:I see this as similar to how 455:Talk:The Avengers (2012 film) 3592:00:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 3578:15:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 3563:04:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 3549:19:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 3534:19:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 3516:16:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 3502:21:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC) 3483:21:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC) 3445:06:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 3421:23:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC) 3394:23:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC) 3384:has been participating in). 3355:22:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC) 3320:In response to a request at 3310:06:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC) 3295:06:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC) 3268:23:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC) 3214:02:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC) 2821:10:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC) 2804:15:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC) 2790:11:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC) 2626:16:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 2608:15:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 2590:02:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 2569:02:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 2545:16:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 2530:12:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 2505:15:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC) 2490:13:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC) 1898:22:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 1871:21:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 1767:Reference named "PhaseFour": 1732:15:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC) 1718:04:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC) 1703:23:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 1552:Cinemablend took note of it 146:17:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 131:16:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 117:13:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 102:06:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 3461:Box office $ 206.1 million 3334:09:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 2555:plot summary until detailed 1663:01:06, 14 August 2021 (UTC) 1645:23:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 1623:13:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 1605:09:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 1590:20:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 1568:20:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 1548:20:37, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 1529:20:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 1458:03:05, 29 August 2021 (UTC) 1411:14:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1388:14:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 967:Requested move 30 June 2021 3968: 3737:written by cooler heads. 3722:helpful, to this article. 3036:this exact same figure is 2398:19:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC) 2372:07:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC) 2021:22:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC) 2006:20:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC) 1986:16:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC) 1964:15:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC) 1950:Disney confirmed on their 1179:—The Marvels, an issue of 717:No, that's literally what 637:discussion, I think it is 539:" which could either mean 533:Based on the Marvel Comics 337:03:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 319:23:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC) 305:01:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC) 284:19:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 269:19:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 254:18:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 228:16:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC) 214:13:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC) 200:13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC) 171:13:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC) 80:Parris filming uncertainty 3938:18:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3911:18:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3896:17:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3864:16:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3841:18:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3826:18:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3799:18:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3784:18:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3762:16:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3747:07:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3732:04:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3717:04:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3688:20:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3467:Whereas the source says: 2356:21:29, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 2337:17:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 2304:16:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 2282:14:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 2256:05:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) 2222:19:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC) 2200:05:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC) 2177:04:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC) 2161:00:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC) 2147:00:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC) 2129:23:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 2105:22:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 2083:01:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC) 2069:23:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 2053:22:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1945: 1904:"A teenage mutant" (Khan) 1304:22:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1292:15:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1275:15:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1258:13:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1241:06:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1224:05:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1201:01:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1137:, which is a redirect to 1118:13:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1070:01:12, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 1052:00:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 962:03:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 495:sequel became a team up, 3926:WP:Build an encyclopedia 3697:Please do not modify it. 3672:WP:Build an encyclopedia 3473:Am I missing something? 2988:it spent $ 274.8 million 1747:I check pages listed in 1685:Given, SLJ has now made 1367:Please do not modify it. 1360:23:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1344:23:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1321:05:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC) 1156:Sloan Digital Sky Survey 1143:Marvels (disambiguation) 1014:01:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC) 981:Please do not modify it. 568:so, no character name? — 235:Apparently, there was a 3404:WP:Beating a dead horse 1946:Zawe Ashton's character 1740:Orphaned references in 934:21:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 910:21:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 885:20:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 846:17:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 828:17:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 793:. To say that novel is 779:15:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 761:15:36, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 730:15:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 713:13:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 695:05:46, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 682:05:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 661:05:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC) 633:Per my comments at the 629:23:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 610:22:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 594:22:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 580:22:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 557:12:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 535:" but then later says " 520:05:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 507:18:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC) 487:22:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC) 473:21:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC) 441:21:35, 4 May 2021 (UTC) 370:17:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC) 3871:WP:Assuming good faith 2321: 2252:User talk:TrixieCat123 2049:User talk:TrixieCat123 2039:User talk:TrixieCat123 1817:The Hollywood Reporter 1806:Thor: Love and Thunder 1774:Ms. Marvel (TV series) 1299:per nom and El Millo. 1282:per nom and El Millo. 1248:per nom and El Millo. 3608:"Box Office Disaster" 3582:My thoughts exactly. 3124:Template:Infobox film 2730:Mhm. That's correct. 1446:not a reliable source 642:credit is definitely 361:official synopsis. — 156:Move to the mainspace 42:of past discussions. 3274:Troubled production? 2559:it's missing stuff. 1167:Marvels (Theopompus) 497:Ant Man and the Wasp 3568:theatrical run. -- 1753:orphaned references 1336:WellThisIsTheReaper 1174:Aja'ib al-Makhluqat 584:No character name.— 541:Marvel Super-Heroes 524:The credits in the 3435:will be released. 3433:next UK tax filing 2636:130 million Budget 2204:Just to note that 2135:#Collider castings 1135:The Marvels (book) 1131:The Marvels (band) 1032:The Marvels (band) 1020:The Marvels (film) 767:El Millo's sandbox 3955: 3954: 3674:. Collapsing per 2644:so who is right? 1992:Collider castings 1923: 1914:comment added by 1785:Los Angeles Times 1440: 1431:comment added by 1221: 1096:The Series Finale 1004: 237:production notice 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3959: 3699: 3676:WP:TALK#POSITIVE 3667: 3383: 3373: 3362:So, The Marvels 2587: 2580: 2515: 2190: 2186: 2185: 1973: 1937: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1868: 1857: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1841: 1833: 1831: 1829: 1801: 1799: 1797: 1357: 1212: 1115: 1110: 1049: 1044: 998: 983: 923: 919: 918: 894: 893: 882: 815: 727: 692: 567: 505: 452: 405: 367: 351:Premise/Synopsis 294: 180: 90: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:Talk:The Marvels 3967: 3966: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3833:Barnards.tar.gz 3776:Barnards.tar.gz 3768:value judgement 3739:Barnards.tar.gz 3695: 3610: 3452: 3429: 3379: 3341: 3339:New Information 3318: 3276: 3221: 3164: 3144: 3090:Barnards.tar.gz 3060:Barnards.tar.gz 3019:Barnards.tar.gz 3005:false precision 2953:Barnards.tar.gz 2921:Barnards.tar.gz 2892:Barnards.tar.gz 2858:Barnards.tar.gz 2813:Barnards.tar.gz 2723: 2694:$ 274.8 million 2638: 2583: 2576: 2557: 2509: 2470: 2410: 2334: 2313:Haunted Mansion 2301: 2263: 2261:Possible delay? 2242: 2183: 2181: 2111:Secret Invasion 2029: 1994: 1948: 1933: 1906: 1878: 1876: 1866: 1844: 1834: 1827: 1825: 1809: 1795: 1793: 1777: 1745: 1687:Secret Invasion 1683: 1611:Secret Invasion 1517:Secret Invasion 1505: 1466: 1419: 1376: 1371: 1370: 1353: 1222: 1184:(Marvel Comics) 1113: 1108: 1047: 1042: 979: 969: 944: 916: 914: 891: 878: 723: 688: 561: 501: 446: 379: 377: 363: 353: 288: 178: 158: 84: 82: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3965: 3963: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3930:Trailblazer101 3888:Trailblazer101 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3828: 3818:Trailblazer101 3815: 3771: 3724:Trailblazer101 3701: 3700: 3691: 3690: 3680:Trailblazer101 3665: 3664: 3650: 3609: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3584:Trailblazer101 3580: 3541:Trailblazer101 3508:Trailblazer101 3494:Trailblazer101 3458:Article says: 3451: 3448: 3428: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3413:Trailblazer101 3396: 3381:UnboundBeartic 3378:(a discussion 3347:UnboundBeartic 3340: 3337: 3317: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3275: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3256:Captain Marvel 3237:Captain Marvel 3225:Captain Marvel 3220: 3217: 3199: 3198: 3163: 3160: 3143: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3011: 3008: 2995: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2887: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2796:Trailblazer101 2778:for the budget 2764:Trailblazer101 2732:Trailblazer101 2719: 2698:Trailblazer101 2673: 2672: 2662:Trailblazer101 2637: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2618:Trailblazer101 2593: 2592: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2537:Trailblazer101 2512:Trailblazer101 2497:Trailblazer101 2469: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2430:Trailblazer101 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2390:Trailblazer101 2387: 2379: 2364:JEDIMASTER2008 2360: 2359: 2358: 2348:Trailblazer101 2330: 2297: 2262: 2259: 2241: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2214:Trailblazer101 2192:Trailblazer101 2163: 2153:Trailblazer101 2117:being wrong. — 2075:Trailblazer101 2071: 2061:Trailblazer101 2028: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2013:Trailblazer101 1993: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1978:Trailblazer101 1947: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1859: 1858: 1846:|archive-date= 1802: 1744: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1578:Trailblazer101 1504: 1501: 1479:#Regarding SLJ 1470:TriiipleThreat 1465: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1395:#Regarding SLJ 1375: 1372: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1346: 1323: 1306: 1294: 1284:Trailblazer101 1277: 1260: 1243: 1226: 1211: 1204: 1203: 1187: 1177: 1170: 1163: 1147: 1146: 1139:Brian Selznick 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1073: 1072: 1017: 991: 990: 976:requested move 970: 968: 965: 943: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 781: 667:Captain Marvel 648:Captain Marvel 621:Trailblazer101 617:Captain Marvel 586:TriiipleThreat 564:TriiipleThreat 549:TriiipleThreat 545:Captain Marvel 527:Captain Marvel 522: 508: 489: 479:TriiipleThreat 475: 460:Captain Marvel 449:Trailblazer101 433:Trailblazer101 417:Monica Rambeau 409:Captain Marvel 394:TriiipleThreat 376: 373: 352: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 329:Trailblazer101 297:Trailblazer101 276:Trailblazer101 246:Trailblazer101 233: 232: 231: 230: 206:Trailblazer101 202: 157: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 148: 138:Trailblazer101 109:Trailblazer101 87:Trailblazer101 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3964: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3922:rule of thumb 3919: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3876:MOS:ACCLAIMED 3872: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3852: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3829: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3813: 3811: 3807: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3772: 3769: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3698: 3693: 3692: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3668: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3654:InfiniteNexus 3651: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3617: 3613: 3607: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3471: 3468: 3465: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3449: 3447: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3382: 3377: 3371: 3365: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3338: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3282: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3218: 3216: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3202: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3167:that's fine. 3161: 3159: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3009: 3006: 3001: 2996: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2939:79.50.113.179 2936: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2842:79.50.113.179 2822: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2782:79.50.113.179 2779: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2750:79.50.113.179 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2722: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2680:79.50.113.179 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646:79.50.113.179 2643: 2635: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2586: 2581: 2579: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2554: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2522:79.50.113.179 2519: 2513: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2478: 2476: 2467: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2446:merchandise. 2444: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2407: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2385: 2383: 2380:talk, though 2377: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2333: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2320: 2318: 2314: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2300: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2260: 2258: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2239: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2164: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1941: 1938: 1936: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1884: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1869: 1864: 1855: 1850:|archive-url= 1839: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1813: 1807: 1803: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1781: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1743: 1739: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1680: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1560: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1503:Regarding SLJ 1502: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1480: 1475: 1471: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1450:InfiniteNexus 1447: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1423: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1368: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1261: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233:InfiniteNexus 1230: 1227: 1225: 1219: 1215: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1178: 1175: 1171: 1168: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1116: 1111: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1092:Series Finale 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1045: 1039: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1002: 996: 989: 987: 982: 977: 972: 971: 966: 964: 963: 959: 955: 954: 949: 941: 935: 931: 927: 922: 913: 912: 911: 907: 903: 902: 897: 889: 888: 887: 886: 883: 881: 847: 843: 839: 835: 834:Facu-el Millo 831: 830: 829: 825: 821: 820: 811: 806: 802: 798: 797: 792: 788: 787: 782: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 763: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 737: 733: 732: 731: 728: 726: 720: 716: 715: 714: 710: 706: 702: 701:Marvel Comics 698: 697: 696: 693: 691: 685: 684: 683: 679: 675: 674: 668: 664: 663: 662: 658: 654: 649: 645: 640: 636: 632: 631: 630: 626: 622: 618: 613: 612: 611: 607: 603: 602: 597: 596: 595: 591: 587: 583: 582: 581: 577: 573: 572: 565: 560: 559: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 528: 523: 521: 517: 513: 512:ChannelSpider 509: 506: 504: 498: 494: 490: 488: 484: 480: 476: 474: 470: 466: 462: 461: 456: 450: 445: 444: 443: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 413:Carol Danvers 410: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390:Facu-el Millo 387: 383: 374: 372: 371: 368: 366: 359: 350: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 321: 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 292: 287: 286: 285: 281: 277: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 242: 238: 229: 225: 221: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 203: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 175: 174: 173: 172: 168: 164: 155: 147: 143: 139: 134: 133: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 118: 114: 110: 106: 105: 104: 103: 99: 95: 88: 79: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3880:WP:HEADLINES 3696: 3618: 3614: 3611: 3522:Man of Steel 3521: 3472: 3469: 3466: 3463: 3460: 3457: 3453: 3430: 3368: 3363: 3342: 3319: 3287:AndyFielding 3280: 3277: 3255: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3222: 3203: 3200: 3165: 3145: 3041: 3033: 2999: 2969: 2839: 2712: 2711: 2639: 2584: 2577: 2558: 2479: 2474: 2471: 2411: 2323: 2322: 2316: 2312: 2310: 2290: 2289: 2264: 2247:TrixieCat123 2245: 2243: 2187: 2166: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2044:TrixieCat123 2042: 2034:TrixieCat123 2032: 2030: 1995: 1974: 1949: 1934: 1927: 1910:— Preceding 1907: 1887: 1882: 1860: 1826:. Retrieved 1815: 1794:. Retrieved 1783: 1766: 1765: 1760: 1746: 1690: 1686: 1684: 1628: 1610: 1580:, thoughts? 1557: 1516: 1512: 1506: 1483: 1473: 1467: 1427:— Preceding 1424: 1420: 1377: 1366: 1354: 1348: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1308: 1296: 1279: 1262: 1245: 1228: 1207: 1190: 1181: 1126: 1109:Hummerrocket 1057: 1043:Hummerrocket 1035: 1027: 1018: 994: 992: 980: 973: 951: 945: 920: 899: 895: 879: 874: 832:Yup exactly 817: 816:parameter. — 809: 804: 800: 794: 784: 745:WP:SYNTHESIS 736:WP:SYNTHESIS 724: 719:WP:SYNTHESIS 689: 671: 666: 647: 616: 599: 569: 544: 540: 531:simply say " 526: 502: 496: 492: 458: 428: 378: 364: 354: 240: 234: 159: 83: 60: 43: 37: 3903:Holydiver82 3856:Holydiver82 3791:Holydiver82 3754:Holydiver82 3709:Holydiver82 3490:The Numbers 3386:Sariel Xilo 3229:The Marvels 3128:Betty Logan 3075:Betty Logan 3046:Betty Logan 3034:John Carter 2974:Betty Logan 2935:220 million 2907:Betty Logan 2873:Betty Logan 2714:MarioProtIV 2678:Ok thanks-- 2614:WP:FILMPLOT 2452:Favre1fan93 2325:MarioProtIV 2317:The Marvels 2292:MarioProtIV 2274:Favre1fan93 2115:The Marvels 2089:Vanity Fair 1998:Favre1fan93 1916:64.72.40.86 1757:The Marvels 1742:The Marvels 1724:Favre1fan93 1695:Favre1fan93 1691:The Marvels 1629:The Marvels 1574:Favre1fan93 1521:Favre1fan93 1513:The Marvels 1474:Film London 1331:The Marvels 1267:Favre1fan93 1182:Generations 1088:The Marvels 1058:Weak oppose 1036:The Marvels 1024:The Marvels 986:move review 421:Kamala Khan 402:Starforce13 386:Adamstom.97 382:Favre1fan93 311:Favre1fan93 291:Favre1fan93 261:Favre1fan93 220:Favre1fan93 36:This is an 3555:adamstom97 3302:adamstom97 3260:adamstom97 2139:adamstom97 2097:adamstom97 2027:Maria Hill 1952:press site 1796:August 24, 1710:adamstom97 1655:IronManCap 1637:adamstom97 1615:IronManCap 1597:adamstom97 1582:IronManCap 1540:IronManCap 1490:IronManCap 1486:London Eye 1403:IronManCap 1301:Chompy Ace 1250:IronManCap 1145:, we have: 1104:The Hobbit 1062:adamstom97 1028:especially 995:Page moved 926:IronManCap 838:IronManCap 814:|Based on= 789:, it says 771:IronManCap 753:IronManCap 705:IronManCap 653:adamstom97 465:IronManCap 425:Ms. Marvel 325:an article 241:Goat Rodeo 94:adamstom97 3636:this edit 3475:Dcfcowper 3409:WP:NORUSH 3326:Chetsford 3233:intention 3206:Montalban 2448:WP:NORUSH 2266:Bloomberg 1935:Starforce 1928:Ms Marvel 1863:AnomieBOT 1355:Starforce 1231:per nom. 880:Starforce 734:It's not 725:Starforce 690:Starforce 529:press kit 503:Starforce 398:Richiekim 365:Starforce 358:like this 163:Richiekim 123:Starzoner 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 3884:WP:CIVIL 3814:multiple 3810:WP:CIVIL 3640:GoneIn60 3570:GoneIn60 3526:GoneIn60 3437:poketape 3400:WP:MCURS 3241:jhsounds 3149:MLcausey 2721:contribs 2600:jhsounds 2332:contribs 2299:contribs 2168:El Millo 2120:El Millo 1956:Aldwiki1 1912:unsigned 1889:El Millo 1838:cite web 1828:July 20, 1822:Archived 1790:Archived 1651:WP:SYNTH 1633:WP:SYNTH 1559:El Millo 1481:above. 1444:IMDb is 1429:unsigned 1313:Jgstokes 1192:El Millo 1080:El Millo 953:El Millo 901:El Millo 819:El Millo 673:El Millo 644:WP:SYNTH 619:sequel. 601:El Millo 571:El Millo 419:", and " 375:Based on 179:Aseleste 3407:again, 3364:appears 3322:WP:RPPI 3281:Variety 3042:Variety 2970:Variety 2414:Visokor 2208:states 1681:Revisit 1349:Support 1326:Support 1309:Support 1297:Support 1280:Support 1263:Support 1246:Support 1229:Support 1214:ZXCVBNM 1208:Support 1158:titled 1152:MARVELS 1127:Support 1106:, etc. 1084:Marvels 493:Ant Man 411:" and " 400:, and 39:archive 3427:Budget 3015:$ 250m 2990:& 2585:Blazer 2443:WP:VNT 2093:TVLine 1114:(talk) 1100:Hobbit 1048:(talk) 3370:spend 3283:piece 3279:This 2475:twice 1975:Added 1804:From 1772:From 1078:Like 896:Agree 749:WP:OR 639:WP:OR 16:< 3934:talk 3907:talk 3892:talk 3878:and 3860:talk 3837:talk 3822:talk 3795:talk 3780:talk 3758:talk 3743:talk 3728:talk 3713:talk 3684:talk 3658:talk 3644:talk 3625:talk 3588:talk 3574:talk 3559:talk 3545:talk 3530:talk 3512:talk 3498:talk 3479:talk 3441:talk 3417:talk 3390:talk 3351:talk 3330:talk 3306:talk 3291:talk 3264:talk 3245:talk 3210:talk 3192:talk 3173:talk 3153:talk 3132:talk 3094:talk 3079:talk 3064:talk 3050:talk 3023:talk 2978:talk 2957:talk 2943:talk 2925:talk 2911:talk 2896:talk 2877:talk 2862:talk 2846:talk 2817:talk 2800:talk 2786:talk 2768:talk 2754:talk 2736:talk 2702:talk 2684:talk 2666:talk 2650:talk 2622:talk 2604:talk 2565:talk 2541:talk 2526:talk 2501:talk 2486:talk 2456:talk 2450:. - 2434:talk 2418:talk 2394:talk 2378:this 2368:talk 2352:talk 2278:talk 2218:talk 2196:talk 2188:Done 2173:talk 2157:talk 2143:talk 2125:talk 2101:talk 2095:. - 2091:and 2079:talk 2065:talk 2017:talk 2002:talk 1982:talk 1960:talk 1920:talk 1894:talk 1883:Done 1854:help 1830:2019 1798:2019 1761:this 1728:talk 1714:talk 1699:talk 1693:? - 1659:talk 1641:talk 1619:talk 1601:talk 1586:talk 1576:and 1564:talk 1554:here 1544:talk 1536:here 1525:talk 1494:talk 1454:talk 1437:talk 1407:talk 1397:and 1393:See 1384:talk 1340:talk 1317:talk 1288:talk 1271:talk 1254:talk 1237:talk 1218:TALK 1197:talk 1102:and 1094:and 1066:talk 1010:talk 1006:Jerm 958:talk 930:talk 921:Done 906:talk 842:talk 824:talk 810:then 805:that 801:that 775:talk 757:talk 747:and 709:talk 678:talk 657:talk 625:talk 606:talk 590:talk 576:talk 553:talk 516:talk 483:talk 469:talk 437:talk 333:talk 315:talk 301:talk 280:talk 265:talk 250:talk 239:for 224:talk 210:talk 167:talk 142:talk 127:talk 113:talk 98:talk 3000:not 2578:Zoo 2270:CBR 2206:THR 2041:) - 1631:is 1556:. — 1334:". 3936:) 3909:) 3894:) 3862:) 3839:) 3824:) 3797:) 3782:) 3760:) 3745:) 3730:) 3715:) 3686:) 3678:. 3660:) 3646:) 3627:) 3590:) 3576:) 3561:) 3547:) 3532:) 3514:) 3500:) 3481:) 3443:) 3419:) 3411:. 3392:) 3353:) 3332:) 3308:) 3293:) 3266:) 3247:) 3212:) 3194:) 3175:) 3155:) 3134:) 3096:) 3081:) 3066:) 3052:) 3025:) 2980:) 2959:) 2945:) 2937:-- 2927:) 2913:) 2898:) 2879:) 2864:) 2848:) 2819:) 2802:) 2788:) 2780:-- 2770:) 2756:) 2748:-- 2738:) 2724:) 2718:(/ 2704:) 2686:) 2668:) 2652:) 2624:) 2606:) 2567:) 2543:) 2528:) 2503:) 2488:) 2458:) 2436:) 2420:) 2396:) 2386:is 2370:) 2354:) 2335:) 2329:(/ 2302:) 2296:(/ 2280:) 2254:) 2220:) 2198:) 2175:) 2159:) 2145:) 2127:) 2103:) 2081:) 2067:) 2051:) 2019:) 2004:) 1984:) 1962:) 1922:) 1896:) 1848:/ 1842:: 1840:}} 1836:{{ 1820:. 1814:. 1808:: 1788:. 1782:. 1776:: 1730:) 1716:) 1701:) 1661:) 1643:) 1621:) 1613:. 1603:) 1588:) 1566:) 1546:) 1527:) 1496:) 1456:) 1409:) 1386:) 1342:) 1319:) 1290:) 1273:) 1256:) 1239:) 1199:) 1098:, 1068:) 1022:→ 1012:) 997:. 978:. 960:) 932:) 924:. 908:) 844:) 826:) 777:) 759:) 711:) 680:) 659:) 627:) 608:) 592:) 578:) 555:) 518:) 485:) 471:) 439:) 396:, 392:, 388:, 384:, 335:) 317:) 303:) 282:) 267:) 252:) 226:) 212:) 198:) 194:, 190:| 186:, 169:) 144:) 129:) 115:) 100:) 3932:( 3905:( 3890:( 3858:( 3835:( 3820:( 3793:( 3778:( 3756:( 3741:( 3726:( 3711:( 3682:( 3656:( 3642:( 3623:( 3586:( 3572:( 3557:( 3543:( 3528:( 3510:( 3496:( 3477:( 3439:( 3415:( 3388:( 3372:. 3349:( 3328:( 3304:( 3289:( 3262:( 3243:( 3208:( 3190:( 3182:@ 3171:( 3151:( 3130:( 3092:( 3077:( 3062:( 3048:( 3021:( 2976:( 2955:( 2941:( 2923:( 2909:( 2894:( 2875:( 2860:( 2844:( 2815:( 2798:( 2784:( 2766:( 2752:( 2734:( 2700:( 2682:( 2664:( 2648:( 2620:( 2602:( 2563:( 2539:( 2524:( 2514:: 2510:@ 2499:( 2484:( 2454:( 2432:( 2416:( 2392:( 2366:( 2350:( 2276:( 2250:( 2216:( 2194:( 2171:( 2155:( 2141:( 2123:( 2099:( 2077:( 2063:( 2047:( 2037:( 2015:( 2000:( 1980:( 1958:( 1918:( 1892:( 1886:— 1867:⚡ 1856:) 1832:. 1800:. 1726:( 1712:( 1697:( 1657:( 1639:( 1617:( 1599:( 1584:( 1562:( 1542:( 1523:( 1492:( 1452:( 1435:( 1405:( 1382:( 1338:( 1315:( 1286:( 1269:( 1252:( 1235:( 1220:) 1216:( 1195:( 1172:— 1165:— 1162:; 1150:— 1064:( 1008:( 1003:) 999:( 956:( 928:( 904:( 898:— 840:( 822:( 773:( 755:( 707:( 676:( 655:( 623:( 604:( 588:( 574:( 566:: 562:@ 551:( 514:( 481:( 467:( 451:: 447:@ 435:( 404:: 380:@ 331:( 313:( 299:( 293:: 289:@ 278:( 263:( 248:( 222:( 208:( 196:l 192:c 188:e 184:t 182:( 165:( 140:( 125:( 111:( 96:( 89:: 85:@ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index