311:
because they "might" contain pro-nazi, pro-fascist, pro-satan sentiments. That there are so few reliable persons who have bothered to take the time to compile source material on many of these subjects, it seems logical that
Knowledge (XXG) would be the perfect place to present an overview and introduction to them. It isn't racist to present ostensibly racist material. Nor is it fascist to study its serpentine course throughout world history. As ugly as it may seem to most people, Black Metal, satanism, and Nazism are not purely of interest only to their various fanatical contingents. Academics like
21:
369:, but from this entry it seems to be a well researched journal, and even if its contents focus on subjects that have a close affinity with neonazism, it seems a step removed from the meat-head thugism that movement usually presents. Also, many 'industrial' bands have flirted with similar ideas, and their wiki entries are valid.
305:
I am not familiar with the much of the content that comprises the bulk of this magazine due primarily to having little exposure to much of its original source material. However, I strongly believe that
Knowledge (XXG) was created for people like me who have a keen interest in satanism, Black Metal,
310:
and the range of topics covered in its pages. These are very significant explorations into the sinister aspect of
Kultcher and the countless individuals who historically have made it their life's work to pursue it. It strikes me as reactionary to beg to eliminate valid, quality, seminal texts
206:
a bit longer. It is not the type of topic that interest me, but I believe it is neutral. However, more information is needed before one can judge its importance: e. g., how big is the readership? Is it expanding? Who reads it, who writes it? Is the only journal of its kind? There is NO factual
235:
Having written much of the article in question, I can attest that its content is not part of some mass mailing intended for the purpose of advertizement. While the journal itself, or some of its contents, can be characterized as "racist propaganda", I strove to adhere to NPOV principles when
266:
scene." The size of its readership, its trajectory, its uniqueness and other factual analysis are, I agree, sorely lacking from the article. The amount of detail to include was something I struggled with; at one point I simply listed the main topics of the issue, but thought this might be
344:
Delete or NPOV'ify it. For deletion is the fact that the article is little more than a list of contents, and are we going to list the contents of ALL magazines, however obscure? A brief item might be more appropriate, just giving bare details about the magazine. or should that be "zine"?
182:
Delete: Actually, if it's illegal, then that does have something to do with whether it should be in
Knowledge (XXG) or not. I don't think this is the case here. This seems like a skateboarder 'zine or fan 'zine, only for fascists. None of them are notable or encyclopedic.
306:
and occult fascism and find most of what is written on these subjects either sensationalistic or dismissive and condemning. The Nexus has proven itself to be relevant in its vary narrow field, as evinced by the opinion of the aformentioned
271:
nature of its viewpoints), so I added the full title of each article to provide context (which also might have cast an impression of POV/propaganda). I thought an article on this journal worthy of inclusion as useful to anyone researching
207:
analysis of the magazine/journal, and left as such it would be cryptic propaganda. It seems to have too much detail and too many links, but again most of them are blue, so, it seems an important subject. In my opinion the article should be
323:
are part of a growing body of intellectuals who have begun to focus on the relationships between occultism, satanism, and fascism. Their work is important and will continue to be whether this exceedingly important journal stays here or is
113:
I don't think that was called for. If something is racist propaganda it should be deleted. Since I don't understand much of this article I am not really qualified to comment, but it doesn't look like racist propaganda to me.
58:
211:
and, because it seems to be the work of only two people, perhaps they ought to reduce detail and clarify some questions that would allow a less drastic, more just decision.
355:
Checked on several library and
University listings, this is not a widespread or established journal and the article is currently little more than an index of its articles.
52:
387:
The extensive issue-by-issue description is unnecessary and unencyclopedic - this should be refactored as a list of common topics, i.e. a summary rather than an
236:
relating them. As to the importance of the periodical, no one would deny its marginality from a mainstream POV, however, in the somewhat subterranean world of
126:, whether it's racist or not has nothing to do with whether or not it should be included in Knowledge (XXG). Whether it's noteworthy or not does. --
175:. (Unless shown notability, in which case rewrite and trim drastically. An I will demand a lot of evidence if I am supposed to change my vote.) -
149:). Topics which are too small have trouble gathering the necessary critical mass of reader/editors to write and then protect a good article.
106:
I'd like to see what makes this encyclopedic. At any rate, we're not here to list every single issue ever produced.] 08:24, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
388:
250:
312:
73:
40:
145:
Comment: Notability is often a reliable proxy verifiability and maintainability (especially the ability to keep it
307:
245:
280:. What I see as the beauty of Knowledge (XXG) is that someone can come across a reference to something like
34:
293:
138:
That's actually entirely bogus. Notability is not a listed criterion for deletion; verifiability is -
96:
30:
191:
66:
316:
289:
80:
284:, type it in, find out what it is, where "it's coming from", and that it's distinct from, say,
336:
263:
195:
159:
153:
139:
176:
328:
285:
254:, describes it as "important as a notice board and contact directory for the worldwide
226:
46:
392:
356:
346:
212:
130:
320:
150:
115:
184:
273:
237:
219:
240:, it is a fairly prominent mainstay (having been continually published since
370:
268:
277:
127:
255:
225:
delete, even if there could be an article it's better to start again
95:
non-encyclopedic (seems to be racist propaganda) 11/26/04 07:47 (UTC)
395:
259:
241:
146:
335:
Keep. Possibly with a cleanup - this reads like an apologia -
15:
65:
79:
158:Yes, but it's still not a criterion in itself -
110:I'd like to see what makes this encyclopedic.
8:
389:indiscriminate collection of information
7:
14:
99:07:48, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)newuser
19:
1:
365:. I'm not familiar with the
411:
396:03:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
331:14:53, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
222:03:16, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
187:14:10, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
142:20:30, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
135:11:16, 2004 Nov 26 (UTC)
349:08:53, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
339:20:30, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
296:00:24, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
246:Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
229:23:55, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
218:Delete unless NPOVed. -
215:14:57, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
198:20:30, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
179:12:35, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
118:08:48, 2004 Nov 26 (UTC)
373:22:47, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
359:02:27, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
162:10:08, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
267:misleading (given the
209:observed by a few days
378:end moved discussion
192:Category:Neo-Nazism
133:
88:
87:
402:
313:Michael Moynihan
290:Nexus comic book
131:
84:
83:
69:
23:
22:
16:
410:
409:
405:
404:
403:
401:
400:
399:
385:
383:Trimming needed
308:Goodrick-Clarke
171:Neo-Nazi spam.
26:
20:
12:
11:
5:
408:
406:
384:
381:
375:
374:
360:
350:
341:
340:
326:
325:
299:
298:
297:
286:Nexus magazine
230:
223:
216:
201:
200:
199:
180:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
121:
120:
119:
112:
86:
85:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
407:
398:
397:
394:
390:
382:
380:
379:
372:
368:
364:
361:
358:
354:
351:
348:
343:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
330:
322:
318:
314:
309:
304:
301:
300:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
247:
243:
239:
234:
231:
228:
224:
221:
217:
214:
210:
205:
202:
197:
193:
189:
188:
186:
181:
178:
174:
170:
161:
157:
156:
155:
152:
148:
144:
143:
141:
137:
136:
134:
129:
125:
122:
117:
111:
108:
107:
105:
102:
101:
100:
98:
93:
92:
82:
78:
75:
72:
68:
64:
60:
57:
54:
51:
48:
45:
42:
39:
36:
32:
29:
28:Find sources:
25:
18:
17:
386:
377:
376:
366:
362:
352:
337:David Gerard
327:
321:Kerry Bolton
317:Kevin Coogan
302:
281:
249:
232:
208:
203:
196:David Gerard
190:False - see
172:
160:David Gerard
140:David Gerard
123:
109:
103:
94:
90:
89:
76:
70:
62:
55:
49:
43:
37:
27:
294:24.17.156.8
220:Sean Curtin
177:Mike Rosoft
97:67.68.83.36
53:free images
274:neofascism
238:neofascism
367:The Nexus
329:Curtsurly
282:The Nexus
269:heterodox
251:Black Sun
227:Mozzerati
91:from VfD:
393:Ziggurat
357:Cari0028
347:Coolmoon
324:removed.
278:Satanism
213:Lcgarcia
104:Comment:
288:or the
276:and/or
256:satanic
151:Rossami
116:Brianjd
59:WP refs
47:scholar
353:Delete
319:, and
185:Geogre
173:Delete
154:(talk)
124:Delete
31:Google
303:Keep.
264:metal
248:, in
233:Keep:
74:JSTOR
35:books
371:Cnwb
363:Keep
260:Nazi
242:1995
204:Keep
147:NPOV
67:FENS
41:news
292:. –
244:).
128:fvw
81:TWL
391:.
315:,
194:-
61:)
262:-
258:-
132:*
77:·
71:·
63:·
56:·
50:·
44:·
38:·
33:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.