74:
53:
84:
22:
349:
Thanks. And fair enough, Paul. Honestly, I'm appalled by the lack of citations and believe this is
Knowledge's greatest weakness. Much of what's entered without citations is accurate, I have no doubt. I'm also convinced that too much is unsourced and is less than accurate. And then decades go by
222:
Three citations for 500+ years of history? That means nothing can be verified. It also means any editor who wants to can remove what's here. So, consider this: if you add to the timeline without a source to point to, your work will most likely be replaced in the future because there's nothing to
195:
I saw no mention of the Dust Bowl or Great
Depression whatsoever. These are major, important events in Kansas history. This directly influenced Kansas as a modern state, and it is not mentioned. Yet there are mentions of Native American battles and moves. Yes, these are important, but if you are
330:
states "Attribute all quotations and any material whose verifiability is challenged or likely to be challenged to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." It further states "If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before
269:
And exactly which of these sources applies to which "fact"? How can anything be verified without citations using this approach? What "guideline" says this is acceptable? I'm not suggesting deleting. Wouldn't think of it. I'm suggesting that editors abide by our values and in so doing, serve our
311:
And I just realized I had already added the template and then saw your comment. To tell you the truth, I hate these templates. But they do serve a good purpose. Seldom does anyone clean up an entire article, but at least future editors are discouraged from adding material without a source.
199:
Also, it mentions the
Populist's revolt in the shortened timeline, but not in the long one. The only way to find out what it is was to follow the link, which was about the People's Party. It took a lot of scrolling to reach where it talked about it.
297:
P.S. What I said was not a threat. I was pointing out that editors could well be wasting their time because more diligent future editors are likely to replace their well-intentioned unsourced work.
395:
168:
I'll remove the inline tag after a bit if no one put some refs in (such as by the person who 1st put the referece tag in the articl in the 1st place) ... as this timeline was gotten from
394:
I was wondering why they didn't have the great depression on here the 20s was a big era of all of america. Why didn't this show information about how Kansas went through with the GD.
235:
No, it just means that there needs to be significant editing. For example, the bullet point "1830: Indian
Removal Act expedites the process of Indian removal." links to the article
181:... oh yes .. this is just basically a stripped down history article ... so, the tag should go there in the real "history of" if there is a concern.
422:
146:
136:
427:
417:
399:
112:
335:
issues. The header tag should be sufficient as there is no deadline. I'll put a note on the WikiProject Kansas page for help.--
97:
58:
33:
369:
340:
256:
208:
39:
277:
111:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
236:
365:
355:
336:
317:
302:
288:
252:
228:
196:
going to leave out the Dust Bowl and Great
Depression you may as well leave them out as well.
204:
403:
373:
359:
344:
321:
306:
292:
260:
212:
185:
176:
411:
169:
89:
351:
313:
298:
284:
224:
327:
182:
173:
102:
79:
73:
52:
243:
section. It would be nice if inline sources were added. This is an
107:
251:
issue and certainly not one that should be preceded with a threat.--
364:
I've done a couple myself and will try to do one or two a day.--
15:
331:
considering whether to remove or tag it." All are basically
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
273:
With those thoughts in mind I'm considering adding a
350:
without anybody doing anything about it. Take care.
283:template, but I am completely open to suggestions.
239:which is abundantly sourced. There's also a good
203:Next revisions should certainly add these in. --
8:
47:
21:
19:
396:2600:1702:4640:2D70:B5C5:85E3:30F2:334B
49:
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
390:What about the Great Depression?
191:Dust Bowl/ Great Depression?????
82:
72:
51:
20:
141:This article has been rated as
423:Top-importance Kansas articles
223:indicate it's worth anything.
1:
270:readers and Knowledge better.
115:and see a list of open tasks.
121:Knowledge:WikiProject Kansas
428:WikiProject Kansas articles
124:Template:WikiProject Kansas
444:
418:List-Class Kansas articles
213:21:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
147:project's importance scale
404:08:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
140:
67:
46:
186:23:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
177:23:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
374:16:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
360:16:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
345:16:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
322:15:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
307:15:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
293:15:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
261:15:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
28:This article is rated
237:Indian Removal Act
98:WikiProject Kansas
34:content assessment
161:
160:
157:
156:
153:
152:
435:
282:
276:
129:
128:
125:
122:
119:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
408:
407:
392:
280:
274:
220:
193:
166:
127:Kansas articles
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
431:
430:
425:
420:
410:
409:
391:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
309:
271:
264:
263:
219:
216:
192:
189:
165:
162:
159:
158:
155:
154:
151:
150:
143:Top-importance
139:
133:
132:
130:
113:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Top‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
415:
413:
406:
405:
401:
397:
389:
375:
371:
367:
366:Paul McDonald
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
337:Paul McDonald
334:
329:
328:Verifiability
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
279:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
254:
253:Paul McDonald
250:
247:issue, not a
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
230:
226:
217:
215:
214:
210:
206:
201:
197:
190:
188:
187:
184:
183:J. D. Redding
179:
178:
175:
174:J. D. Redding
171:
170:public domain
163:
148:
144:
138:
135:
134:
131:
114:
110:
109:
104:
100:
99:
91:
90:Kansas portal
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
393:
332:
248:
244:
240:
221:
202:
198:
194:
180:
167:
142:
106:
96:
40:WikiProjects
326:The policy
205:Brainybrack
412:Categories
278:Refimprove
241:references
103:U.S. state
30:List-class
172:sources.
249:deletion
218:Sources?
352:Allreet
333:editing
314:Allreet
299:Allreet
285:Allreet
245:editing
225:Allreet
145:on the
118:Kansas
108:Kansas
59:Kansas
36:scale.
400:talk
370:talk
356:talk
341:talk
318:talk
303:talk
289:talk
257:talk
229:talk
209:talk
164:Tags
137:Top
105:of
414::
402:)
372:)
358:)
343:)
320:)
305:)
291:)
281:}}
275:{{
259:)
231:)
211:)
398:(
368:(
354:(
339:(
316:(
301:(
287:(
255:(
227:(
207:(
149:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
