Knowledge

Talk:UEFA Euro 2012 Group A

Source đź“ť

1279:. Note that Russia defeat the Czech Republic by 4:1, the Czech Republic defeat Greece by 2:1 and we assume Greece defeat Russia. The goal difference of the Czech Republic among teams in question is -1. Since we assume Greece to defeat Russia while their goal difference among teams in question is -1 before their last group match, they must be the one of the top 2 teams. The goal difference among teams in question of Russia before their last group match is +3, so if they lose not more than 4 goals, their goal difference among teams in question is higher than -2, which makes them rank higher than the Czech Republic. In other words, Greece and Russia will qualify (in some order). 702: 681: 1093:
scenarios was full of such almost speculations that takes many calculations to check. But there is a long way from your example to the scenario of this matchday: If Russia wins the match they win the group! It takes a glance to see that is correct. You ask if I have often seen such scenarios where team X ect. YES! In every final tournament I have used the Knowledge to be updated on. This is common pracis, maybe it should be so but that is a broader discussion and should take place on the Projects talkpage.
712: 443: 354: 327: 597: 576: 191: 492: 471: 607: 502: 364: 243: 222: 253: 1472:
added a long and convoluted explanation which basically said exactly the same as what was already there, that "The Czech Republic will also advance to the quarter-finals if they draw with Poland and Greece does not defeat Russia by fewer than six goals." I think just having that one sentence there is
1274:
You are wrong. If Greece defeat Russia and the Czech Republic draws with Poland, the three teams Russia, Greece and the Czech Republic will tie on 4 points. The points among their matches will be 3 points for each team, so the first tiebreaker fails. The second tiebreaker comes to the goal difference
1092:
And this is a updated relevant encyclopedia, maybe a little different than the 100 year old 100 volumes kind that we had 20 years ago. This one is updated after each match, not just after each match day. Your made up scenario full of speculation might not be correct, and I would agree with you if the
1282:
If Russia lose by 5 goals, they tie with the Czech Republic on this tiebreaker. Because Greece have left the tiebreaker at this point, we come to the first tiebreaker among Russia and the Czech Republic again, which is their match result. Since Russia defeat the Czech Republic, Russia come second in
1030:
Maybe the very complex calculations you are using as a not routine calculations, I am sure that is why not all these pages have next matchday scenarios. But for both this group right now (and for the group B) it is very routine calculations, very very routine calculations. So putting a tag on a page
1170:
If, after having applied criteria 1) to 3), two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1) to 3) are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine the final rankings of the two teams. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 5) to 9) apply in
1063:
The problem is that while it might be obvious and meaningful, it isn't sourced or reliable (the best example: the scenario now displayed isn't true either), so it can be a source of argument. Another problem: is it relevant? I mean, would you keep the scenario on this page for 10 years? Have you
1554:
I made an edit to correct the dashes to minus signs in the standings for goal difference, and it was removed twice. This should be put back, because in accordance with Knowledge's style, "& minus;" (without a space in between the "&" and "minus;") is the correct script for a minus sign.
1035:. On this talkpage it would be interesting to have many different editors to contributed to change or make a policy on this subject - a policy needed at most football articles. But for now I am removing this tag. Tagging something that are obsolete in a few hours are not the right use of tags. 1361:
Yes, only that the spread between the Czech and Russia is 5 goals. Since Czech would stay at -2 GF that means Greece must win by at least 5 goals (depending on the total number of scored goals from Russia and the Czech) for the Czech to get ahead of Russia.
1031:
where the contents will be changed in two hours are in my opionon very much overkill and nitpicking. A general debate about when and when not to would be very useful. But not to be put here for the next two hours. It would be a very useful debate at
1534:
I added the color-coded table before the standings table (which appears on the main UEFA Euro 2012 page), and it was removed. I put it back, and it should remain since it is necessary to read the standings table below it.
153: 1064:
often seen "team X would have qualified if had won match Y"? While it surely is a piece of interesting information now, for an encyclopedia like Knowledge, it becomes pretty useless after a certain period of time.
452: 337: 834:
I'll just give one example of this and you tell me if the calculation is an obvious and meaningful reflection of the sources, and what you need to do to check if it's correct without proper references.
1397:
True! I was factoring in the goals scored between the Czech and Poland but of course that's irrelevant. So just edit the number of goals between Greece and Russia to 6 and we're done?
1376:
They must win by 6 since Russia has already scored more goals than Czech in the three way tiebreaker (4 vs. 3) and the Czech have played both their matches against Russia and Greece.
1613: 1608: 147: 1603: 1663: 768: 758: 44: 1668: 1658: 1648: 1214:
or if they lose to Greece, the Czech Republic draw with Poland, and Russia does not have a worse goal differential than both Greece & the Czech Republic.
1204:
Here's my version of a correct analysis. Let's use it for starters, and discuss what's wrong with it 'here' before we make the final edit in the article.
1473:
better, but I also think it might be a bit difficult to grasp just what it means, so I've reverted it but also reworded it a bit. How does it look now?
79: 1583: 734: 309: 299: 1001:
So why keeping deleting the scenarios? These have been inserted for ages in WP without anyone complaining about before. It's obvious and meaningful.
1190:
Number 2 means that Greece is guaranteed to qualify if they win and the Czech draw, since Greece already has better goal difference than the Czech.
1628: 1598: 663: 558: 548: 433: 423: 1643: 1588: 1578: 653: 1653: 85: 1078:
It's deleted/renewed after the matchday is completed or a part of it so after the group stage is over the scenarios aren't there anymore...
1633: 1623: 1618: 1593: 725: 686: 1164:
Superior goal difference resulting from the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
1638: 1108: 1032: 275: 1480: 1383: 988: 168: 629: 524: 399: 135: 1167:
Higher number of goals scored in the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
1229:
or if they draw with Poland, Russia loses to Greece, and the Czech Republic does not have a worse goal differential than Russia.
99: 30: 1259: 266: 227: 104: 20: 74: 1346:
It highlights more how open the group really are right now. All four teams can qualify by themselve, that is remarkable.
620: 581: 515: 476: 395: 377: 332: 202: 129: 258: 65: 125: 954:
will advance to the quarterfinals as the second-placed team in the group if they defeat Mali by at least 9 goals
1126: 190: 175: 1484: 1387: 1351: 1098: 1040: 992: 109: 1499:
Why has the red shading on the Russia and Poland columns been removed? It looked better with the shading?
1116: 1054: 1021: 963: 799: 24: 1107:
If it takes a glance and it's so obvious, there's no point to include it. Anyway, I started a section at
1469: 717: 382: 208: 701: 680: 1476: 1379: 1247: 987:
The formula for these results is rigid, so indirectly, this information still comes from the source.
271: 141: 1006: 161: 55: 1456: 1418: 1284: 1065: 733:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
628:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
523:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
274:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1440: 1402: 1367: 1347: 1255: 1195: 1094: 1036: 70: 1560: 1540: 1460: 1435:
I can't revert to that because of conflicting intermediate edits. It has to be done manually.
1422: 1288: 1112: 1069: 1050: 1017: 959: 795: 51: 1325:
or if they lose to Greece with less than three goals and the Czech Republic draw with Poland.
1519: 1083: 442: 1504: 978: 822: 1002: 730: 1572: 1436: 1398: 1363: 1251: 1191: 1161:
Higher number of points obtained in the matches played between the teams in question;
1129: 791: 612: 507: 369: 1556: 1536: 1564: 1544: 1523: 1508: 1488: 1464: 1444: 1426: 1406: 1391: 1371: 1355: 1292: 1263: 1199: 1132: 1120: 1102: 1087: 1073: 1058: 1044: 1025: 1010: 996: 982: 967: 826: 803: 353: 326: 1515: 1079: 596: 575: 1500: 974: 818: 707: 602: 497: 491: 470: 359: 248: 923:
will advance to the quarterfinals as the second-placed team in the group if:
884:
will advance to the quarterfinals as the second-placed team in the group if:
864:
will advance to the quarterfinals as the second-placed team in the group if:
1314:
All teams can advance to the quarter-finals if they win their next match
252: 242: 221: 1211:
will advance to the quarter-finals if they defeat or draw with Greece.
1237:
will advance to the quarter-finals if they defeat the Czech Republic.
625: 520: 386: 1016:
They are not referenced and certainly are not routine calculations.
394:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
790:
Next match day scenarios are not referenced and are a violation of
1226:
or if they draw with Poland and Greece does not defeat Russia .
813: 184: 15: 1322:
will advance to the quarter-finals if they draw with Greece.
1180:
position in the UEFA national team coefficient ranking system
1514:
After all matches are played those red columns are deleted.
1334:
will advance to the quarter-finals if they draw with Poland
1157:
Hi Jack, and others. First of all, these are the criteria.
441: 1243:
will advance to the quarter-finals if they defeat Russia.
1223:
will advance to the quarter-finals if they defeat Poland.
814:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:NOR#Routine_calculations
729:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 160: 624:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 519:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1177:
higher number of goals scored in all group matches;
1340:or Russia loses to Greece with more than two goals 1183:fair play conduct of the teams (final tournament); 809:Are you sure? Isn't it under Routine calculations? 1283:the group. Again, Greece and Russia will qualify. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1417:Skrofler, please just revert to my last change. 1614:Sports and games in Russia task force articles 1609:Start-Class Russia (sports and games) articles 1174:superior goal difference in all group matches; 174: 8: 188: 1604:Low-importance Start-Class Russia articles 675: 570: 465: 321: 216: 1049:Nitpicking is the only way to stop this. 911:they defeat Ghana by at least 2 goals, or 453:the sports and games in Russia task force 944:Botswana defeat Mali by at most 8 goals. 1111:so you can provide your opinion there. 867:they lose to Guinea by 2 or 3 goals, or 677: 572: 467: 323: 218: 1664:Low-importance Czech Republic articles 7: 1669:All WikiProject Czech Republic pages 743:Knowledge:WikiProject Czech Republic 723:This article is within the scope of 618:This article is within the scope of 513:This article is within the scope of 375:This article is within the scope of 264:This article is within the scope of 1659:Start-Class Czech Republic articles 1649:WikiProject Greece general articles 1337:and Greece does not defeat Russia . 1303:Wouldnt it be more logical to say: 855:they lose to Guinea by only 1 goal 840:On the next matchday (1 February): 746:Template:WikiProject Czech Republic 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 973:Yes it's obvious and meaningful. 926:they defeat Ghana by only 1 goal 891:Ghana defeat or draw with Guinea. 1584:Mid-importance football articles 710: 700: 679: 605: 595: 574: 500: 490: 469: 362: 352: 325: 251: 241: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1455:The current version looks fine. 763:This article has been rated as 658:This article has been rated as 553:This article has been rated as 428:This article has been rated as 304:This article has been rated as 1629:Low-importance Poland articles 1599:Low-importance Russia articles 852:they do not lose to Guinea, or 284:Knowledge:WikiProject Football 1: 1644:Low-importance Greek articles 1589:WikiProject Football articles 1579:Start-Class football articles 918:Mali fail to defeat Botswana. 737:and see a list of open tasks. 632:and see a list of open tasks. 527:and see a list of open tasks. 450:This article is supported by 287:Template:WikiProject Football 278:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1654:All WikiProject Greece pages 874:Mali fail to defeat Botswana 638:Knowledge:WikiProject Greece 533:Knowledge:WikiProject Poland 408:Knowledge:WikiProject Russia 1634:WikiProject Poland articles 1624:Start-Class Poland articles 1619:WikiProject Russia articles 1594:Start-Class Russia articles 641:Template:WikiProject Greece 536:Template:WikiProject Poland 411:Template:WikiProject Russia 259:Association football portal 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1685: 1639:Start-Class Greek articles 769:project's importance scale 726:WikiProject Czech Republic 664:project's importance scale 559:project's importance scale 434:project's importance scale 310:project's importance scale 1565:21:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 1550:Minus sign vs. other dash 1545:21:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 1524:22:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 1509:17:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 1489:03:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 1465:22:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1445:22:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1427:22:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1407:22:18, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1392:22:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1372:22:12, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1356:22:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1293:22:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1264:21:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1200:21:50, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1133:21:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 1121:20:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1103:20:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1088:20:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1074:19:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1059:19:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1045:18:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1026:18:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1011:18:18, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 997:21:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 983:20:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 968:14:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 827:13:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 804:21:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 762: 695: 657: 590: 552: 485: 449: 427: 385:dedicated to coverage of 347: 303: 236: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 937:Botswana defeat Mali, or 933:they draw against Ghana 930:Mali defeat Botswana, or 894:they draw with Botswana 1277:among teams in question 908:will win the group if: 849:will win the group if: 749:Czech Republic articles 398:, or contribute to the 446: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 25:UEFA Euro 2012 Group A 1307:On the next match day 1125:I found a reference. 958:Ghana defeat Guinea. 887:they defeat Botswana 859:Mali defeat Botswana. 718:Czech Republic portal 445: 100:Neutral point of view 1109:WikiProject Football 1033:WikiProject Football 898:Ghana defeat Guinea. 870:they lose to Guinea 272:Association football 267:WikiProject Football 105:No original research 940:they lose to Ghana 1470:User:Strafpeloton2 914:they defeat Ghana 621:WikiProject Greece 516:WikiProject Poland 447: 400:project discussion 378:WikiProject Russia 338:Sports & games 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1530:Color-coded table 1479:comment added by 1382:comment added by 1267: 1250:comment added by 786:Original research 783: 782: 779: 778: 775: 774: 674: 673: 670: 669: 569: 568: 565: 564: 464: 463: 460: 459: 320: 319: 316: 315: 290:football articles 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1676: 1491: 1394: 1266: 1244: 1171:the order given; 1153:QF qualification 751: 750: 747: 744: 741: 720: 715: 714: 713: 704: 697: 696: 691: 683: 676: 646: 645: 642: 639: 636: 615: 610: 609: 608: 599: 592: 591: 586: 578: 571: 541: 540: 537: 534: 531: 510: 505: 504: 503: 494: 487: 486: 481: 473: 466: 416: 415: 412: 409: 406: 372: 367: 366: 365: 356: 349: 348: 343: 340: 329: 322: 292: 291: 288: 285: 282: 261: 256: 255: 245: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1569: 1568: 1552: 1532: 1474: 1377: 1245: 1186:drawing of lots 1155: 788: 748: 745: 742: 739: 738: 716: 711: 709: 689: 643: 640: 637: 634: 633: 611: 606: 604: 584: 539:Poland articles 538: 535: 532: 529: 528: 506: 501: 499: 479: 414:Russia articles 413: 410: 407: 404: 403: 392:To participate: 368: 363: 361: 341: 335: 289: 286: 283: 280: 279: 257: 250: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1682: 1680: 1672: 1671: 1666: 1661: 1656: 1651: 1646: 1641: 1636: 1631: 1626: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1606: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1586: 1581: 1571: 1570: 1551: 1548: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1430: 1429: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1332:Czech Republic 1328: 1327: 1326: 1317: 1302: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1269: 1268: 1238: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1221:Czech Republic 1217: 1216: 1215: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1154: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 971: 970: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 938: 931: 921: 920: 919: 912: 901: 900: 899: 892: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 868: 862: 861: 860: 853: 838: 837: 836: 835: 811: 810: 787: 784: 781: 780: 777: 776: 773: 772: 765:Low-importance 761: 755: 754: 752: 740:Czech Republic 735:the discussion 731:Czech Republic 722: 721: 705: 693: 692: 690:Low‑importance 687:Czech Republic 684: 672: 671: 668: 667: 660:Low-importance 656: 650: 649: 647: 644:Greek articles 630:the discussion 617: 616: 600: 588: 587: 585:Low‑importance 579: 567: 566: 563: 562: 555:Low-importance 551: 545: 544: 542: 525:the discussion 512: 511: 495: 483: 482: 480:Low‑importance 474: 462: 461: 458: 457: 448: 438: 437: 430:Low-importance 426: 420: 419: 417: 390: 389:on Knowledge. 374: 373: 357: 345: 344: 342:Low‑importance 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 306:Mid-importance 302: 296: 295: 293: 276:the discussion 263: 262: 246: 234: 233: 231:Mid‑importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1681: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1642: 1640: 1637: 1635: 1632: 1630: 1627: 1625: 1622: 1620: 1617: 1615: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1587: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1549: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348:Jack Bornholm 1339: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1329: 1324: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316:. If loosing: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1304: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1213: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1152: 1134: 1131: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1095:Jack Bornholm 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037:Jack Bornholm 1034: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 998: 994: 990: 985: 984: 980: 976: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 950: 943: 939: 936: 932: 929: 925: 924: 922: 917: 913: 910: 909: 907: 906: 905: 902: 897: 893: 890: 886: 885: 883: 880: 873: 869: 866: 865: 863: 858: 854: 851: 850: 848: 847: 846: 843: 842: 841: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 808: 807: 806: 805: 801: 797: 793: 785: 770: 766: 760: 757: 756: 753: 736: 732: 728: 727: 719: 708: 706: 703: 699: 698: 694: 688: 685: 682: 678: 665: 661: 655: 652: 651: 648: 631: 627: 623: 622: 614: 613:Greece portal 603: 601: 598: 594: 593: 589: 583: 580: 577: 573: 560: 556: 550: 547: 546: 543: 526: 522: 518: 517: 509: 508:Poland portal 498: 496: 493: 489: 488: 484: 478: 475: 472: 468: 455: 454: 444: 440: 439: 435: 431: 425: 422: 421: 418: 401: 397: 393: 388: 384: 380: 379: 371: 370:Russia portal 360: 358: 355: 351: 350: 346: 339: 334: 331: 328: 324: 311: 307: 301: 298: 297: 294: 277: 273: 269: 268: 260: 254: 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1553: 1533: 1498: 1481:88.91.42.145 1475:— Preceding 1384:88.91.42.145 1378:— Preceding 1345: 1331: 1319: 1313: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1276: 1246:— Preceding 1240: 1234: 1220: 1208: 1203: 1189: 1156: 1113:Dr. Vicodine 1051:Dr. Vicodine 1018:Dr. Vicodine 1000: 989:84.86.56.119 986: 972: 960:Dr. Vicodine 955: 951: 941: 934: 927: 915: 903: 895: 888: 881: 871: 856: 844: 839: 817: 812: 796:Dr. Vicodine 789: 764: 724: 659: 619: 554: 514: 451: 429: 396:project page 391: 376: 305: 265: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1309:(16 June): 383:WikiProject 199:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 1573:Categories 1003:Schnapper 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1477:unsigned 1437:Skrofler 1399:Skrofler 1380:unsigned 1364:Skrofler 1260:contribs 1252:Skrofler 1248:unsigned 1192:Skrofler 1130:LukeSurl 952:Botswana 281:Football 228:Football 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1557:Dar5995 1537:Dar5995 1457:Ckhandy 1419:Ckhandy 1285:Ckhandy 1066:Zokniaw 767:on the 662:on the 557:on the 432:on the 308:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1516:Kante4 1320:Russia 1241:Greece 1235:Poland 1209:Russia 1080:Kante4 904:Guinea 792:WP:NOR 635:Greece 626:Greece 582:Greece 530:Poland 521:Poland 477:Poland 405:Russia 387:Russia 333:Russia 205:scale. 126:Google 1501:Jas39 975:Kiwi8 845:Ghana 819:Kiwi8 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1561:talk 1541:talk 1520:talk 1505:talk 1485:talk 1461:talk 1441:talk 1423:talk 1403:talk 1388:talk 1368:talk 1352:talk 1330:The 1289:talk 1256:talk 1219:The 1196:talk 1117:talk 1099:talk 1084:talk 1070:talk 1055:talk 1041:talk 1022:talk 1007:talk 993:talk 979:talk 964:talk 882:Mali 823:talk 800:talk 381:, a 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 956:and 942:and 935:and 928:and 916:and 896:and 889:and 872:and 857:and 759:Low 654:Low 549:Low 424:Low 300:Mid 176:TWL 1575:: 1563:) 1543:) 1522:) 1507:) 1487:) 1463:) 1443:) 1425:) 1405:) 1390:) 1370:) 1354:) 1291:) 1262:) 1258:• 1198:) 1128:-- 1119:) 1101:) 1086:) 1072:) 1057:) 1043:) 1024:) 1009:) 995:) 981:) 966:) 825:) 802:) 794:. 336:: 156:) 54:; 1559:( 1539:( 1518:( 1503:( 1483:( 1459:( 1439:( 1421:( 1401:( 1386:( 1366:( 1350:( 1287:( 1254:( 1194:( 1115:( 1097:( 1082:( 1068:( 1053:( 1039:( 1020:( 1005:( 991:( 977:( 962:( 821:( 798:( 771:. 666:. 561:. 456:. 436:. 402:. 312:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
UEFA Euro 2012 Group A
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Football
WikiProject icon
icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑