Knowledge

Tallmadge Amendment

Source 📝

27: 20: 135:
And provided, that the further introduction of slavery or involuntary servitude be prohibited, except for the punishment of crimes, whereof the party shall have been fully convicted; and that all children born within the said State, after the admission thereof into the Union, shall be free at the age
167:
Southerners in Congress asserted that the Tallmadge Amendment was unconstitutional because it put restrictions on states as a condition of admission to the Union. They argued that it was the decision of Missouri, not of Congress, to allow slavery there. The proponents of the Tallmadge Amendment
140:
There were two senators from each state, regardless of its population. The number of seats in the House of Representatives, however, was based on the population of the state, and to complicate matters further, slave states were allowed to count
153:, which also had a large percentage of slaves and so resulted in a lower countable populace. Thus, the proposed Tallmadge Amendment was seen as a way to restrict the weight of the slaveholding South in Congress further. 334: 164:
adjourned on March 4, 1819 without acting on Missouri's request for statehood. Heated discussions on the Tallmadge Amendment and Missouri statehood continued through the summer and the fall.
76:
The measure passed the House 87-76, with northern Representatives voting 86-10 for it and southern Representatives voting 66-1 against it. The amendment, however, was rejected in the
107:
was passed without the Tallmadge Amendment. The Compromise attempted to appease both sides of the debate by admitting Missouri as a slave state in exchange for the admission of
324: 131:, sought to impose conditions on Missouri's statehood that would provide for the eventual termination of legal slavery and the emancipation of current slaves: 329: 319: 58: 344: 127:
concerning the admission of Missouri as a state and its effect on the existing balance of slave and free states, Tallmadge, an opponent of
339: 157: 169: 81: 251: 202: 160:
in general. By a close vote on the same day, the House adopted the Tallmadge Amendment, but the Senate promptly rejected it.
128: 124: 66: 192:
warned Tallmadge on the floor of Congress that he had kindled "a fire which only seas of blood could extinguish."
142: 161: 150: 146: 54: 189: 77: 104: 62: 168:
argued that "slavery itself was a moral and political evil that was contrary to the spirit of the
112: 46: 80:, because of growing Southern opposition to slavery that was joined by five northern Senators: 173: 181: 156:
Tallmadge delivered an impassioned speech on February 16 in support of his amendment and of
70: 26: 180:
Passions ran high, and the words "disunion" and "civil war" were boldly uttered. The aged
93: 19: 185: 89: 184:
wrote that the sudden strife woke him like the alarm of a fire-bell in the night. And
313: 85: 111:
as a free state and by the complete prohibition of slavery in all of the remaining
302:(2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Riverside Press. 1952. p. 335. 288:(2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Riverside Press. 1952. p. 334. 42: 38: 145:, which increased their number of representatives. The population of the 97: 50: 274:(1st ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Ginn and Company. p. 208. 241:(1st ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Ginn and Company. p. 210. 108: 25: 18: 335:
United States federal territory and statehood legislation
256:, House of Representatives, 15th Congress, 2nd Session 224:
The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Jackson
176:only by necessity and ought to now be restricted." 178: 133: 8: 115:territory north of the 36˚30' parallel. 172:, and that it had been tolerated in the 149:had grown more rapidly than that of the 214: 143:three fifths of their slave population 325:History of United States expansionism 265: 263: 57:. The amendment was submitted in the 7: 330:Legal history of the United States 270:David Muzzey; Arthur Link (1968). 237:David Muzzey; Arthur Link (1968). 16:Proposed 1819 American legislation 14: 320:Pre-statehood history of Missouri 45:regarding the admission of the 203:History of slavery in Missouri 1: 59:U.S. House of Representatives 345:16th United States Congress 170:Declaration of Independence 123:In response to the ongoing 73:, and Charles Baumgardner. 361: 340:Presidency of James Monroe 61:on February 13, 1819, by 49:as a state, under which 53:would be admitted as a 222:Wilentz, Sean (2005). 194: 138: 30: 23: 272:Our Country's History 239:Our Country's History 136:of twenty-five years. 67:Democratic-Republican 47:Territory of Missouri 29: 22: 105:Missouri Compromise 63:James Tallmadge Jr. 35:Tallmadge Amendment 254:Annals of Congress 125:debate in Congress 113:Louisiana Purchase 100:, and two others. 31: 24: 300:The Federal Union 286:The Federal Union 352: 304: 303: 296: 290: 289: 282: 276: 275: 267: 258: 249: 243: 242: 234: 228: 227: 219: 82:Harrison G. Otis 37:was a proposed 360: 359: 355: 354: 353: 351: 350: 349: 310: 309: 308: 307: 298: 297: 293: 284: 283: 279: 269: 268: 261: 250: 246: 236: 235: 231: 221: 220: 216: 211: 199: 121: 94:Jesse B. Thomas 17: 12: 11: 5: 358: 356: 348: 347: 342: 337: 332: 327: 322: 312: 311: 306: 305: 291: 277: 259: 244: 229: 226:. p. 845. 213: 212: 210: 207: 206: 205: 198: 195: 186:Thomas W. Cobb 120: 117: 90:Ninian Edwards 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 357: 346: 343: 341: 338: 336: 333: 331: 328: 326: 323: 321: 318: 317: 315: 301: 295: 292: 287: 281: 278: 273: 266: 264: 260: 257: 255: 248: 245: 240: 233: 230: 225: 218: 215: 208: 204: 201: 200: 196: 193: 191: 187: 183: 177: 175: 171: 165: 163: 159: 154: 152: 148: 144: 137: 132: 130: 126: 118: 116: 114: 110: 106: 103:In 1820, the 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86:Massachusetts 83: 79: 74: 72: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 28: 21: 299: 294: 285: 280: 271: 253: 247: 238: 232: 223: 217: 179: 174:Constitution 166: 158:abolitionism 155: 139: 134: 122: 102: 75: 34: 32: 78:U.S. Senate 314:Categories 209:References 119:Background 55:free state 182:Jefferson 39:amendment 197:See also 162:Congress 98:Illinois 71:New York 51:Missouri 190:Georgia 129:slavery 252:1170 151:South 147:North 109:Maine 69:from 41:to a 92:and 65:, a 43:bill 33:The 188:of 96:of 84:of 316:: 262:^ 88:,

Index



amendment
bill
Territory of Missouri
Missouri
free state
U.S. House of Representatives
James Tallmadge Jr.
Democratic-Republican
New York
U.S. Senate
Harrison G. Otis
Massachusetts
Ninian Edwards
Jesse B. Thomas
Illinois
Missouri Compromise
Maine
Louisiana Purchase
debate in Congress
slavery
three fifths of their slave population
North
South
abolitionism
Congress
Declaration of Independence
Constitution
Jefferson

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.