Knowledge (XXG)

Tapia v. United States

Source 📝

31: 361: 327: 411:, specifically that a court must "recogniz that imprisonment is not an appropriate means of promoting correction and rehabilitation." Further, the act instructs the courts to acknowledge this fact when "determining whether to impose a term of imprisonment, and... determining the length of the term." 293:
Alejandra Tapia was sentenced to 51 months in federal prison for bringing an illegal immigrant into the United States for financial gain. Tapia challenged the basis for the District Court's sentencing decision. Specifically, Tapia challenged basing the length of sentence on speculation about when
406:
precludes a federal court from imposing or lengthening a prison term for the purposes of prompting rehabilitation. The Court held in a unanimous opinion that it does. First considered by the Court was the language of the
379: 313:
on the issue. Specifically, the Eighth and Ninth Circuits permit the use of rehabilitation as a factor in sentencing, while four other circuit courts prohibit it. The Court agreed to hear the case on that issue.
580: 570: 509: 130: 82: 419:
Justice Sotomayor wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Alito, in which she expressed "skepticism that the District Judge violated this proscription in this case".
370: 565: 575: 274: 256: 35: 378: 299: 538: 282: 151:
precludes a federal court from imposing or lengthening a prison sentence for the purposes of rehabilitation.
456: 439: 118: 513: 408: 403: 148: 134: 74: 546: 194: 295: 277:
case in which the Court held that a federal court cannot give a criminal defendant a longer
210: 186: 182: 520: 468: 278: 198: 174: 63: 326: 559: 310: 260: 206: 166: 77: 488: 377: 218: 115: 550: 476: 394: 306: 126: 93: 111: 89: 529: 122: 472: 30: 321: 359: 302:, relying on its previous decisions, affirmed the decision. 489:
Questions presented in No. 10-5400, Tapia v. United States
338: 581:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
298:' drug abuse treatment program. In a brief order, the 385:
Recording of oral arguments before the Supreme Court.
96:
4556; 79 U.S.L.W. 4521; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 1160
571:
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines case law
250: 242: 231: 226: 155: 141: 106: 101: 69: 59: 49: 42: 23: 294:Tapia would be able to enter and complete the 8: 54:Alejandra Tapia, Petitioner v. United States 402:The issue before the Court was whether the 443:, No. 09-50248, (9th Cir. April 16, 2010). 20: 110:Defendant convicted, 3:08-CR-00249-BTM ( 539:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived) 428: 305:Tapia petitioned the Supreme Court for 392: 491:, Supreme Court of the United States. 18:2011 United States Supreme Court case 7: 434: 432: 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 566:United States Supreme Court cases 516:319 (2011) is available from: 457:Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 393:Problems playing this file? See 375: 325: 29: 576:2011 in United States case law 300:Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 1: 273:, 564 U.S. 319 (2011), was a 275:United States Supreme Court 597: 530:Oyez (oral argument audio) 246:Sotomayor, joined by Alito 255: 160: 146: 28: 473:Court grants 3 new cases 547:Tapia v. United States 506:Tapia v. United States 453:Tapia v. United States 440:United States v. Tapia 364: 270:Tapia v. United States 24:Tapia v. United States 409:Sentencing Reform Act 404:Sentencing Reform Act 363: 149:Sentencing Reform Act 114:2010); affirmed, 376 88:131 S. Ct. 2382; 180 45:Decided June 16, 2011 43:Argued April 18, 2011 479:(December 10, 2010). 318:Opinion of the Court 195:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 365: 337:. You can help by 171:Associate Justices 380: 355: 354: 296:Bureau of Prisons 266: 265: 235:Kagan, joined by 588: 543: 537: 534: 528: 525: 519: 492: 486: 480: 466: 460: 450: 444: 436: 382: 381: 362: 350: 347: 329: 322: 156:Court membership 137:1104 (2010). 33: 32: 21: 596: 595: 591: 590: 589: 587: 586: 585: 556: 555: 541: 535: 532: 526: 523: 517: 501: 496: 495: 487: 483: 467: 463: 459:, July 9, 2010. 451: 447: 437: 430: 425: 417: 400: 399: 391: 389: 388: 387: 386: 383: 376: 373: 366: 360: 351: 345: 342: 335:needs expansion 320: 291: 211:Sonia Sotomayor 209: 197: 187:Clarence Thomas 185: 183:Anthony Kennedy 97: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 594: 592: 584: 583: 578: 573: 568: 558: 557: 554: 553: 544: 500: 499:External links 497: 494: 493: 481: 469:Lyle Denniston 461: 445: 427: 426: 424: 421: 416: 413: 390: 384: 374: 371:Oral arguments 369: 368: 367: 358: 357: 356: 353: 352: 332: 330: 319: 316: 290: 287: 283:rehabilitation 264: 263: 257:18 U.S.C. 253: 252: 248: 247: 244: 240: 239: 233: 229: 228: 224: 223: 222: 221: 199:Stephen Breyer 175:Antonin Scalia 172: 169: 164: 158: 157: 153: 152: 144: 143: 139: 138: 108: 104: 103: 99: 98: 87: 71: 67: 66: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 593: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 567: 564: 563: 561: 552: 548: 545: 540: 531: 522: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 498: 490: 485: 482: 478: 474: 470: 465: 462: 458: 454: 449: 446: 442: 441: 435: 433: 429: 422: 420: 414: 412: 410: 405: 398: 396: 372: 349: 340: 336: 333:This section 331: 328: 324: 323: 317: 315: 312: 311:circuit split 309:, citing the 308: 303: 301: 297: 288: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 262: 258: 254: 249: 245: 241: 238: 234: 230: 227:Case opinions 225: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 170: 168: 165: 163:Chief Justice 162: 161: 159: 154: 150: 145: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 95: 91: 85: 84: 79: 76: 72: 68: 65: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 549:coverage on 505: 484: 464: 452: 448: 438: 418: 401: 343: 339:adding to it 334: 304: 292: 269: 268: 267: 261:§ 3582a 251:Laws applied 236: 214: 207:Samuel Alito 202: 190: 178: 167:John Roberts 102:Case history 81: 53: 15: 415:Concurrence 281:to promote 243:Concurrence 219:Elena Kagan 560:Categories 551:SCOTUSblog 477:SCOTUSblog 423:References 395:media help 307:certiorari 289:Background 94:U.S. LEXIS 92:357; 2011 60:Docket no. 346:June 2011 237:unanimous 129:granted, 112:S.D. Cal. 90:L. Ed. 2d 70:Citations 504:Text of 279:sentence 232:Majority 123:9th Cir. 116:F. App'x 142:Holding 125:2010); 64:10-5400 542:  536:  533:  527:  524:  521:Justia 518:  259:  217: 215:· 213:  205: 203:· 201:  193: 191:· 189:  181: 179:· 177:  512: 133: 127:cert. 107:Prior 514:U.S. 147:The 135:U.S. 83:more 75:U.S. 73:564 510:564 471:, " 341:. 131:562 119:707 78:319 562:: 508:, 475:" 455:, 431:^ 285:. 397:. 348:) 344:( 121:( 86:) 80:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
10-5400
U.S.
319
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
S.D. Cal.
F. App'x
707
9th Cir.
cert.
562
U.S.
Sentencing Reform Act
John Roberts
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
18 U.S.C.
§ 3582a
United States Supreme Court
sentence
rehabilitation
Bureau of Prisons

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.