253:, the chair of the TEF panel said that the TEF was not supposed to be a "direct measure of teaching" but rather "a measure based on some of the outcomes of teaching", that different outcomes for institutions with similar metrics was to be directed as "The TEF is metric-led, not metric determined" and that the TEF was "a relative, rather than absolute measure of university and college performance". He also noted that "whilst universities have been impressive at widening participation they have been less assiduous in combatting the impact of disadvantage after students enroll", and said that the TEF was with doing as it had "raised the profile of teaching" and "focused attention on things which need to be done better".
236:, with the same number of negative flags, received bronze, "perhaps because one was not in an NSS-derived category". Wonkhe further noted that "it seems perverse that an institution – in Bristol’s case – which was ‘notably’ below benchmark should receive a higher outcome than Liverpool for which the statement is softer" and that "for institutions with a similar data pattern to Bristol’s, such as Southampton (with two negative flags in the same categories, but which wasn’t upgraded to Silver) there could be some well-deserved anger. And if you look to Durham, with its one positive flag, and no negatives, it only has a Silver result when compared to Nottingham’s Gold."
217:, which was rated bronze, said "There is no logic in our result at all", and that he had "deep concerns about its subjective assessment, its lack of transparency, and with different benchmarks for each institution removing any sense of equity and equality of assessment". He also pointed out that exceeding the benchmark by what the TEF considered a significant margin was much easier for institutions with lower benchmarks – to beat its benchmark on drop-out rate of 4.5% by the required two percentage points, Southampton would have to have achieved a drop-out rate of only 2.5% – leading him to conclude that "the benchmarking is fundamentally flawed".
196:
on the written submissions and 'split' metrics (a breakdown of the core metrics by gender, ethnicity, age, disability, etc.). While the extent of these modifications was expected to be limited, changes were made to the initial hypothesis in 22% of cases. Among higher education institutions and alternative providers, three were downgraded, 17 were upgraded from Bronze to Silver, 15 were upgraded from Silver to Gold, and one was upgraded from Bronze to Gold.
246:(HEPI), said after the results were released that "the fact that some of the results seem surprising suggests it is working", as it was designed to be different from other league tables. He added, however, that "in this early guise, the TEF is far from a perfect assessment of teaching and learning. While it tells us a lot of useful things, none of them accurately reflects precisely what goes on in lecture halls."
264:, stated that the TEF was a 'godsend' for higher education. She stated: "For people like me, a vice-provost, TEF exercises are actually a godsend because what happens is, for the first time, the president and the provost start paying close attention to the quality of teaching...It’s not a bad thing if there is very close attention being paid to teaching at research-intensive universities."
228:, which had a positive flag for highly skilled employment and a negative flag for student satisfaction, was awarded gold, "the presumption that a negative flag would rule out Gold hav been overturned by the panel, perhaps because the TEF guidance also steered the panel away from over-reliance on NSS scores." Similarly, the
55:, in order of quality of teaching. The first results were published in June 2017. This was considered a "trial year" (even though the non-provisional ratings awarded are valid for 3 years) and is to be followed by a "lessons learned exercise" that will feed into the 2018 TEF and longer-term plans for subject-level ratings.
75:
Universities are measured across three areas: teaching quality, learning environment, and student outcomes and learning gain. For 2017, all institutions meeting basic standards will be allowed to raise fees. The first ratings were to have been announced on 14 June 2017, publication having been delayed from May due to the
374:(NSS), the results of which feed into the TEF, unless the link was broken. There were suggestions that the boycott may have backfired as participation levels in the National Student Survey rose nationally with some commentators linking this to the additional publicity from the boycott. However 12 institutions, including
195:
Institutions received three or more positive flags and no negative flags are initially considered Gold; institutions with two or more negative flags are initially considered Bronze; all other institutions are initially considered Silver. This initial hypothesis can then be modified by the panel based
539:
As set out in its white paper, Success as a knowledge economy (May 2016), the government will shortly begin a lessons learned exercise into this first trial year of the TEF. The findings of the lessons learned exercise will inform the operation of the TEF in 2018 and the intention to move to subject
386:
universities, were omitted from the NSS results in 2017 due to having less than the required 50% of final year students complete the survey; which is seen as evidence that the boycott was successful in at least some of those institutions. However, with the boycott coming too late to prevent the use
394:
Some top universities threatened to boycott the TEF, fearing that reputational damage might outweigh potential gain. However, in
January 2017, just prior to the deadline for signing up, the higher education minister said that "almost all" universities would, after all, take part, and Times Higher
74:
The TEF ratings are based on statistics such as dropout rates, student satisfaction survey results and graduate employment rates. These are assessed by experts in teaching and learning who make a recommendation to a TEF panel, which includes academics and students, that will make the final award.
387:
of the NSS in the 2017 TEF, it would be necessary to sustain it for a further two years in order to have any effect and the national NUS conference voted in 2017 not to debate a continued boycott or send it to their
National Executive Committee. The boycott may also benefit universities such as
125:
The "initial hypothesis" for the ratings is based on six core metrics, for which institutions receive a double-positive flag, a positive flag, no flag, a negative flag or a double-negative flag, depending on whether they exceed or fall short of their benchmark by certain thresholds. These are:
275:
Eighteen institutions chose to appeal their 2017 ratings, including at least four from the
Russell Group. Of eleven institutions that said they were appealing, three were awarded Silver and eight Bronze. Appeals must demonstrate a "significant procedural irregularity" and cannot challenge the
121:
The TEF ratings do not measure absolute performance, like traditional university league tables, but rather performance against benchmarks based on their student intake. A university with a low absolute dropout rate of 2% and a benchmark of 2% would thus be rated worse on this measure than a
329:
noted that the financial cost of living in London meant that the student retention rate in the city was lower than the national average. The director of HEPI, Nick
Hillman, said that there might not be any gold-rated universities in London, but that for institutions such as the
934:
83:. It was expected that 20–30% of the institutions would be rated gold, 50–60% silver, and 20% bronze. The actual distribution, across all rated institutions including further education and alternative providers, was 26% gold, 50% silver, 24% bronze.
122:
university with a much higher absolute dropout rate of 8% but a benchmark of 11%. The ratings are thus a measure of whether a university exceeds, meets or falls short of expectations based on the profile of students admitted and subjects taught.
113:
Institutions that do not enter the TEF or that do not meet the minimum quality threshold will not receive an award. Institutions with insufficient data for a full assessment but which meet the quality standards can receive an unrated
1186:
199:
Following the publication of the 2017 "trial year" results, the TEF is to undergo a "lessons learned exercise" that will feed into the 2018 exercise as well as a full independent review on its use of statistics by 2020.
334:
this would not have a significant impact as "ts name and reputation for research excellence will trump any negative press it gets from the TEF". Similarly, a "Mock TEF" carried out by the data analytics team at
923:
212:
said that "TEF does not measure absolute quality and we have raised concerns that the current approach to flags and benchmarking could have a significant unintended impact." while the vice-chancellor of the
306:
reported in May 2017 that a number of "world-renowned" universities were at risk of receiving a bronze rating; particularly London institutions, which normally have lower student satisfaction scores. The
391:
for which student satisfaction has traditionally been low. Whether metrics such as student satisfaction and employability data are valid measures of teaching quality has also been questioned.
1175:
363:(in order of their ranking) were definitely rated as gold, although this did not include any adjustments that may be made for the qualitative submissions from institutions.
690:
297:
1132:
39:, which may be used from 2020 to determine whether state-funded providers are permitted to raise tuition fees. Higher education providers from elsewhere in the
1220:
792:
Providers that meet rigorous national quality requirements but which do not yet have sufficient data to be fully assessed may opt in for a provisional award.
321:
were expected to do well. However, universities also submitted additional written information to the TEF to clarify their institutional context: the head of
188:
178:
367:
288:; all other appeals were rejected. In addition, four institutions appealed their eligibility for provisional TEF awards, of which three were successful.
1241:
326:
641:
608:
464:
103:: "provision is of high quality, and significantly and consistently exceeds the baseline quality threshold expected of UK Higher Education"
76:
662:
1112:
749:
419:
164:
443:
284:
was re-graded on appeal, moving from silver to gold, and the only other change made was a revision of the statement of findings for
1091:
1057:
830:
1012:
952:
731:
995:
Joe
Banfield (22 June 2017). "Durham University fires pure sass in spicy email announcing it will contest silver TEF rating".
35:) is a government assessment of the quality of undergraduate teaching in universities and other higher education providers in
1262:
1072:
1294:
168:
711:
522:
1153:
243:
1278:
331:
269:
973:
281:
265:
214:
735:
572:
The government introduced the TEF in 2016 as a trial year, from which lessons will be learned for future years.
526:
352:
225:
87:
322:
805:
375:
371:
344:
257:
233:
154:
144:
134:
97:: "provision is consistently outstanding and of the highest quality found in the UK Higher Education sector"
1158:
1137:
1117:
1096:
957:
716:
667:
448:
336:
309:
900:
388:
229:
296:
Prior to their publication, the TEF results were expected to be significantly different from the usual
1035:
896:
874:
584:
379:
360:
356:
21:
852:
43:
are allowed to opt-in, but the rating has no impact on their funding. The TEF rates universities as
776:"New assessment highlights excellence of teaching and learning across UK universities and colleges"
775:
492:"New assessment highlights excellence of teaching and learning across UK universities and colleges"
491:
469:
277:
348:
343:
institutions did well on absolute results, once results were adjusted for student intake only
285:
261:
232:
overcame two negative flags – both in NSS-related categories – to be awarded silver, but the
325:
said that he hoped this would raise the institution from a bronze to a silver rating, while
318:
221:
1181:
929:
80:
250:
40:
220:
Analysis of the results and the panel statements by higher education policy thinktank
1288:
396:
383:
340:
314:
209:
1246:
1225:
695:
646:
424:
302:
239:
272:, suggested that the TEF would bring benefits to universities in the long-run.
58:
In
October 2017 the official title of the exercise was officially renamed from
399:
universities had committed to participating, with the others not yet decided.
280:, submitted an intent to appeal but had its case ruled inadmissible. Only the
1201:
555:
924:"Elite UK universities found to be second-rate in new Government rankings"
831:"TEF results must be carefully communicated to improve students' choices"
691:"Why should I care about the teaching excellence framework? – explainer"
366:
The link between the TEF and tuition fees has been criticised, with the
997:
36:
1221:"The Teaching Excellence Framework: can higher education up its game?"
16:
For information about other organisations or groups using the acronym
1013:"HEPI Director responds to the Teaching Excellence Framework results"
585:"Farewell TEF, hello TEaSOF: Year 3 digested | Wonkhe | Policy Watch"
79:, but were postponed until 22 June after the election resulted in a
779:
615:
559:
1242:"Universities and NUS plan boycott of flagship teaching rankings"
1092:"UEA upgraded to gold in teaching excellence framework on appeal"
444:"England's universities to have medal-style ratings for teaching"
208:
After the publication of the results, the acting director of the
1058:"Imperial vice-provost: TEF a 'godsend' for university teaching"
806:"TEF Results 2023: A Guide To The Teaching Excellence Framework"
753:
663:"Publication of teaching excellence framework results postponed"
465:"What will change under the Higher Education and Research Act?"
395:
Education was able to confirm that all but five of the
English
276:
academic judgment of the TEF panels. At least one institution,
953:"TEF: 'meaningless' results 'devoid of credibility', says v-c"
1113:"Will teaching excellence framework shatter old hierarchies?"
642:"TEF: big upsets expected in official UK university rankings"
974:"TEF results – What the panel statements say, and don't say"
317:(two in London) were in danger of being rated bronze, while
420:"English universities to be ranked gold, silver and bronze"
1176:"Students boycotting NUS National Student Survey boycott"
313:
also reported in early June 2017 that the members of the
1263:"TEF boycott fears allayed as elite universities opt in"
897:"Positive result in the Teaching Excellence Framework"
732:"Teaching Excellence Framework: year 2 specification"
523:"Universities rated in Teaching Excellence Framework"
1133:"Mock TEF results revealed: a new hierarchy emerges"
609:"Student guide to the Teaching Excellence Framework"
1174:
922:
413:
411:
64:Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework
29:Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework
1154:"Destabilising the teaching excellence framework"
1073:"More UK universities appeal against TEF ratings"
635:
633:
712:"TEF: LSE, Southampton and Liverpool get bronze"
1036:"TEF results – the chair's post-match analysis"
875:"TEF results – Who moved up and who fell down?"
298:rankings of universities in the United Kingdom
853:"TEF results – The full core metrics results"
517:
515:
507:An award will be valid for up to three years.
437:
435:
8:
189:Destination of Leavers from Higher Education
179:Destination of Leavers from Higher Education
1202:"A bruising boycott for the Russell Group"
185:Highly skilled-employment or further study
756:. What if my university doesn’t have TEF?
750:"The Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF)"
946:
944:
109:: "provision is of satisfactory quality"
550:
548:
407:
1060:. Times Higher Education. 1 July 2017.
1240:Anna Fazackerley (22 November 2016).
1219:Rebecca Ratcliffe (2 November 2015).
1200:Nona Buckley-Irvine (9 August 2017).
249:In response to some of these points,
7:
738:. 29 September 2016. pp. 46–47.
370:(NUS) voting in 2016 to boycott the
418:Richard Adams (29 September 2016).
256:At a conference held in late June,
1173:Rachael Pells (24 February 2017).
165:Higher Education Statistics Agency
14:
442:John Morgan (29 September 2016).
244:Higher Education Policy Institute
86:The ratings are described by the
1189:from the original on 2022-05-26.
1071:Chris Havergal (3 August 2017).
937:from the original on 2022-05-26.
640:Anna Fazackerley (30 May 2017).
1034:Chris Husbands (23 June 2017).
1261:John Elmes (23 January 2017).
1090:John Morgan (15 August 2017).
921:Rachael Pells (22 June 2017).
661:Chris Havergal (9 June 2017).
1:
829:Sarah Stevens (31 May 2017).
463:David Midgley (17 May 2017).
169:Individualised Learner Record
60:Teaching Excellence Framework
972:Ant Bagshaw (22 June 2017).
689:Rachel Hall (19 June 2017).
1152:Rima Amin (21 April 2016).
951:Jack Grove (22 June 2017).
710:Jack Grove (22 June 2017).
175:Employment or further study
1311:
1111:Jack Grove (8 June 2017).
368:National Union of Students
339:in 2016 showed that while
332:London School of Economics
15:
527:Department for Education
282:University of East Anglia
266:University College London
215:University of Southampton
736:Department for Education
226:University of Nottingham
204:Reaction to 2017 results
88:Department for Education
372:National Student Survey
258:Imperial College London
234:University of Liverpool
155:National Student Survey
145:National Student Survey
141:Assessment and feedback
135:National Student Survey
1159:Times Higher Education
1138:Times Higher Education
1118:Times Higher Education
1097:Times Higher Education
1077:Times Higher Education
958:Times Higher Education
877:. Wonkhe. 22 June 2017
855:. Wonkhe. 22 June 2017
717:Times Higher Education
668:Times Higher Education
449:Times Higher Education
337:Times Higher Education
319:post-1992 universities
310:Times Higher Education
242:, the director of the
1281:, Office for Students
901:University of Warwick
323:King's College London
230:University of Bristol
131:Teaching on my course
1295:Education in England
1015:. HEPI. 22 June 2017
804:Bryan (2023-11-08).
77:UK general election
540:level assessments.
382:and several other
278:Swansea University
286:Durham University
262:Simone Buitendijk
260:'s Vice Provost,
1302:
1267:
1266:
1258:
1252:
1251:
1237:
1231:
1230:
1216:
1210:
1209:
1197:
1191:
1190:
1178:
1170:
1164:
1163:
1149:
1143:
1142:
1129:
1123:
1122:
1108:
1102:
1101:
1087:
1081:
1080:
1068:
1062:
1061:
1054:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1043:
1031:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1020:
1009:
1003:
1002:
992:
986:
985:
983:
981:
969:
963:
962:
948:
939:
938:
926:
918:
912:
911:
909:
907:
893:
887:
886:
884:
882:
871:
865:
864:
862:
860:
849:
843:
842:
840:
838:
826:
820:
819:
817:
816:
801:
795:
794:
789:
787:
772:
766:
765:
763:
761:
746:
740:
739:
728:
722:
721:
707:
701:
700:
686:
680:
679:
677:
675:
658:
652:
651:
637:
628:
627:
625:
623:
613:
605:
599:
598:
596:
595:
581:
575:
574:
569:
567:
552:
543:
542:
536:
534:
519:
510:
509:
504:
502:
488:
482:
481:
479:
477:
460:
454:
453:
439:
430:
429:
415:
161:Non-continuation
151:Academic support
1310:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1285:
1284:
1275:
1270:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1182:The Independent
1172:
1171:
1167:
1151:
1150:
1146:
1141:. 23 June 2016.
1131:
1130:
1126:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1041:
1039:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1018:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1006:
994:
993:
989:
979:
977:
971:
970:
966:
950:
949:
942:
930:The Independent
920:
919:
915:
905:
903:
895:
894:
890:
880:
878:
873:
872:
868:
858:
856:
851:
850:
846:
836:
834:
828:
827:
823:
814:
812:
803:
802:
798:
785:
783:
774:
773:
769:
759:
757:
748:
747:
743:
730:
729:
725:
709:
708:
704:
688:
687:
683:
673:
671:
660:
659:
655:
639:
638:
631:
621:
619:
618:. December 2016
611:
607:
606:
602:
593:
591:
583:
582:
578:
565:
563:
556:"About the TEF"
554:
553:
546:
532:
530:
521:
520:
513:
500:
498:
490:
489:
485:
475:
473:
462:
461:
457:
441:
440:
433:
417:
416:
409:
405:
294:
224:noted that the
206:
81:hung parliament
72:
25:
12:
11:
5:
1308:
1306:
1298:
1297:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1274:
1273:External links
1271:
1269:
1268:
1253:
1232:
1211:
1192:
1165:
1144:
1124:
1103:
1082:
1063:
1049:
1026:
1004:
987:
964:
940:
913:
888:
866:
844:
821:
796:
782:. 21 June 2017
767:
741:
723:
702:
681:
653:
629:
600:
576:
562:. 22 June 2017
544:
529:. 22 June 2017
511:
483:
455:
431:
406:
404:
401:
293:
290:
270:Michael Arthur
268:'s President,
251:Chris Husbands
205:
202:
193:
192:
182:
172:
158:
148:
138:
111:
110:
104:
98:
71:
68:
41:United Kingdom
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1307:
1296:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1280:
1279:About the TEF
1277:
1276:
1272:
1264:
1257:
1254:
1249:
1248:
1243:
1236:
1233:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1215:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1196:
1193:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1177:
1169:
1166:
1161:
1160:
1155:
1148:
1145:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1128:
1125:
1120:
1119:
1114:
1107:
1104:
1099:
1098:
1093:
1086:
1083:
1078:
1074:
1067:
1064:
1059:
1053:
1050:
1037:
1030:
1027:
1014:
1008:
1005:
1000:
999:
991:
988:
975:
968:
965:
960:
959:
954:
947:
945:
941:
936:
932:
931:
925:
917:
914:
902:
898:
892:
889:
876:
870:
867:
854:
848:
845:
832:
825:
822:
811:
807:
800:
797:
793:
781:
777:
771:
768:
755:
751:
745:
742:
737:
733:
727:
724:
719:
718:
713:
706:
703:
698:
697:
692:
685:
682:
670:
669:
664:
657:
654:
649:
648:
643:
636:
634:
630:
617:
610:
604:
601:
590:
586:
580:
577:
573:
561:
557:
551:
549:
545:
541:
528:
524:
518:
516:
512:
508:
497:
493:
487:
484:
472:
471:
466:
459:
456:
451:
450:
445:
438:
436:
432:
427:
426:
421:
414:
412:
408:
402:
400:
398:
397:Russell Group
392:
390:
385:
384:Russell Group
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:Russell Group
338:
333:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:Russell Group
312:
311:
305:
304:
299:
291:
289:
287:
283:
279:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
252:
247:
245:
241:
237:
235:
231:
227:
223:
218:
216:
211:
210:Russell Group
203:
201:
197:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
123:
119:
117:
108:
105:
102:
99:
96:
93:
92:
91:
89:
84:
82:
78:
69:
67:
65:
61:
56:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
23:
19:
1256:
1247:The Guardian
1245:
1235:
1226:The Guardian
1224:
1214:
1205:
1195:
1180:
1168:
1157:
1147:
1136:
1127:
1116:
1106:
1095:
1085:
1076:
1066:
1052:
1040:. Retrieved
1029:
1017:. Retrieved
1007:
996:
990:
978:. Retrieved
967:
956:
928:
916:
904:. Retrieved
891:
879:. Retrieved
869:
857:. Retrieved
847:
835:. Retrieved
824:
813:. Retrieved
810:Britannia UK
809:
799:
791:
784:. Retrieved
770:
758:. Retrieved
744:
726:
715:
705:
696:The Guardian
694:
684:
672:. Retrieved
666:
656:
647:The Guardian
645:
620:. Retrieved
603:
592:. Retrieved
588:
579:
571:
564:. Retrieved
538:
531:. Retrieved
506:
499:. Retrieved
495:
486:
474:. Retrieved
468:
458:
447:
425:The Guardian
423:
393:
365:
308:
303:The Guardian
301:
295:
274:
255:
248:
240:Nick Hillman
238:
219:
207:
198:
194:
184:
174:
160:
150:
140:
130:
124:
120:
115:
112:
106:
100:
94:
85:
73:
63:
59:
57:
52:
48:
44:
32:
28:
26:
17:
292:Controversy
116:provisional
815:2023-12-06
594:2017-12-14
403:References
353:Birmingham
187:(from the
177:(from the
163:(from the
153:(from the
143:(from the
133:(from the
376:Cambridge
361:Newcastle
345:Cambridge
1289:Category
1187:Archived
1038:. Wonkhe
976:. Wonkhe
935:Archived
833:. WonkHE
470:Prospect
1042:24 June
1019:24 June
998:The Tab
980:24 June
906:22 June
881:23 June
859:23 June
786:27 June
674:13 June
566:27 June
533:22 June
501:27 June
476:12 June
389:Bristol
191:survey)
181:survey)
118:award.
70:Ratings
62:to the
37:England
1206:Wonkhe
837:3 June
760:3 June
622:3 June
589:Wonkhe
380:Oxford
357:Exeter
349:Durham
222:Wonkhe
107:Bronze
101:Silver
53:Bronze
49:Silver
20:, see
780:HEFCE
616:HEFCE
612:(PDF)
560:HEFCE
496:HEFCE
171:data)
1044:2017
1021:2017
982:2017
908:2017
883:2017
861:2017
839:2017
788:2017
762:2017
754:UCAS
676:2017
624:2017
568:2017
535:2017
503:2017
478:2017
359:and
327:SOAS
167:and
95:Gold
90:as:
45:Gold
27:The
51:or
33:TEF
22:Tef
18:TEF
1291::
1244:.
1223:.
1204:.
1185:.
1179:.
1156:.
1135:.
1115:.
1094:.
1075:.
955:.
943:^
933:.
927:.
899:.
808:.
790:.
778:.
752:.
734:.
714:.
693:.
665:.
644:.
632:^
614:.
587:.
570:.
558:.
547:^
537:.
525:.
514:^
505:.
494:.
467:.
446:.
434:^
422:.
410:^
378:,
355:,
351:,
347:,
300:.
66:.
47:,
1265:.
1250:.
1229:.
1208:.
1162:.
1121:.
1100:.
1079:.
1046:.
1023:.
1001:.
984:.
961:.
910:.
885:.
863:.
841:.
818:.
764:.
720:.
699:.
678:.
650:.
626:.
597:.
480:.
452:.
428:.
157:)
147:)
137:)
31:(
24:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.