1129:, I agree with Yoninah's edits, it was too long for a lead and works much better with sections. Being very general, it was intended to show how the realities of the country (culture, audiences, climate, industry) shape its comedians, and what distinguishes Canadian comedians from those of other countries. I'll try to write a lead and organize it in that vein. I'm not sure anything stands out as hook-worthy. I have a couple sources which say something along the lines of "Canada produces more comedians per capita than any other country in the world", which I feel is broadly interesting, but they aren't high-quality sources for census-type information like that, and I didn't include it in the article as I felt it was likely to be challenged. (Census information I did find grouped comedians with actors, so I couldn't resolve it as a distinct profession.) If we can't think of a good hook, I'm fine with dropping it, but please keep the QPQ credit for the review. –
1310:
682:, even if both articles are bolded? What's the difference in requirements between a bolded article and a linked article, just that they've both been through review? They don't need to be connected to one another via a hook that is sourced in each? It seems like when someone goes to a bolded article and doesn't see anything that connects it to the hook, they'd wonder why. ETA: er, not arguing, just trying to get my own understanding straight. :) --
1813:
1732:
420:
409:
398:
387:
376:
361:
955:: 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. However, the material which constitutes the lead is unorganized and jumps from topic to topic. I suggest writing a more general lead (see hidden note in edit window) and then breaking the rest up into subsections. After "Types of humour", though, I was unable to find a logical sequence; it all seems like a mish-mash.
1503:
1908:
1353:
890:
1429:
1381:
1154:
979:
912:
199:
1058:
946:
444:
615:
awards, and in the awards article that poutine was served. Winning a Beaver would need to be mentioned in the Made in Canada article, and the fact Made in Canada won a Beaver in the awards article. But the Made in Canada article doesn't need to mention poutine, and vice versa. But maybe I'm wildly off base here! --
1692:
Canadians identify with their sense of humour but cannot always express it; comedians are the exceptional individuals with artistic talent who can express the cultural ideas and ideals of humour, and represent this aspect of the culture – becoming the group's cultural representatives, eh? Does that
1403:
I set the long skinny picture of
Katherine Ryan to 150px. The others are all 'thumb's, which I believe sets the width according to the user preferences and browser platform. The Wayne & Shuster picture certainly fits the hook, and I was really pleased to find it. Have added it to ALT2c, above.
1019:
which is for an artist's debut work (i.e. first novels written by authors, not the first year the award was given). Some list by the year, but this can become ambiguous and confusing (between the eligibility year, the year the award was given, if the ceremony ever skipped a year for some reason, or
614:
the other articles, just that the point in the hook (that poutine was served at this awards dinner, for instance) would need to be mentioned in both articles, and so on. Poutine doesn't need to go into any of the other articles. It just needs to be in the poutine article that they were served at the
593:
Rule H5 requires the hook fact to be cited in the article, but it isn't clear if the hook fact must be present in every bolded article of a multiple-article hook. I don't mind the addition of the hook fact to the above articles (poutine, peameal bacon), but it might seem trivial or out of place in
1199:
Source: "working-class individuals idea of Canada's cultural best is more likely to include the
Canadian comedians who have frequented American television shows such as Saturday Night Live (Dan Akroyd, Mike Myers) or rock groups such as Rush or more recently internationally famous performers such
1621:
I have a quote from a comedy historian that " comedians have long been a source of national pride" but I was trying to keep the article short and generalized and was avoiding quotes. There were also quotes that "Canada produces more notable comedians per capita than any other country" but I would
999:
Comments: I wonder about the article name, why "1st", not "First"? I also suggest you write a short lead and have a new section below. The names of collagues of someone who won in two categories seems no lead material. - General: I'd collapse the navbox in all articles, at least until there's more
798:
and
Canadian comedians. (About 20 people on that list received awards at the 1st CCAs; less than 5% of the list. Mump and Smoot are regarded as the most-famous Canadian clown duo, so Canadian clowns → Mump and Smoot.) I'm open to ALT1 but would like to see how the rest of the reviews go. –
1257:
I've added a lead paragraph, expanded a little and organized the sections a bit. The one layout problem might be that the A, B, C are L2 sections when they might logically fit better as L3 sections. Also I should probably put the TOC higher up. (I took a look at a few other list articles and
1025:
I noted the colleagues who shared that award because it wasn't written out anywhere else in prose. The lead looks a little long compared to the prose in some sections, but it's also summarizing a lot of tables. (I feel like it would get a bit redundant if all the information in tables was also
514:
GTG: was expanded from 762 characters to 5000+ between Jun 7 and 10, nominated Jun 7, so plenty long and 5x expansion done and nominated in time. I did not find the hook info (that it was served at the first awards) in the article, but I did find that at the awards article, so I’ve added it in
1367:
I like ALT2c. Fixed the TOC and section headers, and added a bunch of images, all marked with free licenses. I tried to use performance images, and then added a few others where there were gaps. I tried to balance the columns and images as best I could, hopefully it doesn't look too bad at
266:
Other awards went to: Mike
Kennard and John Turner (a.k.a. Mump and Smoot, although they appeared sans clown face last night); best actorin a comedic play Canada's comic elite were finally able to take home something more tangible than simply the memory of chuckles and guffaws."
1838:
I'm going to suggest a slight revision to ALT4, as the article doesn't say that Canada's climate did give rise to dark and fatalistic humour, it says that kind of humour is "generally attributed" to the climate of the vast and often sparsely populated country. So, what about:
1961:: There are 2 separate hooks on this page, ALT1 which is scheduled for a special occasion appearance on July 1, and ALT2c. Please leave this template open after promoting one so the other will still be available for promotion. Or, promote them at the same time! Thank you,
988:: 5x expansion verified, new enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. All of the citations for the hook are found in this article, and hook refs are verified and cited inline. Image is freely licensed. Good to go.
1655:
it does seem to me that you wrote this article very sketchily; perhaps you were just busy with all the other articles you were nominating. If you were to expand any of the sections with examples, rather than generalities, I think you could come up with better hooks.
1222:
I think the hook is good. Are you going to create a lead paragraph too? I'm not very familiar with list articles but you should probably summarize the major points there. I'll take a look at this once this is done. Overall, this is ripe for promotion.
1667:
My feeling was that the prose should be just enough to introduce the list, and what distinguishes
Canadian comedians from other comedians. I didn't want to go down the path of examples – although I could see doing that in a history section
548:
GTG: is long enough and was reviewed for GA June 7, so new enough. There are sufficient citations, at least one per paragraph, and they appear to be in good shape. Once again I did not find the hook point in the article, but again added it.
1391:
nice job on the images. Confirming that all images are freely licensed. What do you think about adding the Wayne and
Schuster image to this nomination? From a design point of view, the images do look a bit too big. Are they default 200px?
515:+source. There was a minor instance of too-close paraphrasing in the lead, which I fixed. Article is sufficiently sourced, and references appear to be in good shape. The point within the hook that references this article is interesting. --
1208:
It's not in the article yet, but does that sound hook-worthy? Oh, the "more likely" part in the source is comparing what is broadly popular to what is traditionally chosen from the fine arts by the elite. Feel free to suggest changes.
1622:
not consider the sources reliable for that kind of data and was unable to find census data to back it up. (Although comparing with the lists for other countries, Canada certainly has more
Knowledge articles on comedians per capita.)
637:
Ah, good! CCA has "The Beaver" and comedians, the List refers to CCA, you've fixed the food articles, and MIC refers to this article and CCAs. This main article is the only one with the complete hook fact. –
93:
1685:
The vicarious actions undertaken by individual, exceptional persons either for, on behalf of, or acting as proxy for the other members of the group in question or society (or even the whole human race).
794:
Comment: My idea was for "Made in Canada, clowns and comedians" to read without the comma, as if "Made in Canada" was a compound modifier applied to "clowns and comedians", like another way of saying
1625:
I feel the Wayne & Shuster picture worked when the hook was about Canada's cultural representatives to the world. I'm not so sure about the other hooks. I suppose if we expanded something like
700:
the hook fact has to appear in only one bolded article in the hook, even if there are 30 bolded articles! I don't understand your question about linked articles; they are not subject to DYK review.
306:
557:
Fixed an instance of too-close paraphrasing. Point within the hook that references this article is interesting. Article is stable. Image of
Poutine is properly licensed and used in article. --
294:
262:. Sources: "the premier Canadian Comedy Awards guests munched on Canadian fare like back bacon on a bun and poutine Rick Mercer was chosen best male performer in a TV comedy for
465:
Nothing specific. I suppose a picture would balance-out the length of the hook, so good idea! The picture of the trophy at the CCA article is fair use, as is the title card for
302:
1033:
which I was going to move to mainspace when this passed, but I recently gained access to the ProQuest database and want to flesh them out with additional sources first.) –
1688:
1015:). It probably makes it easier for listing/navigation, and to keep the title from becoming unwieldy. When I ran an intitle search with "first" I mostly found things like
1510:. Let's get the hook into shape and approved before promotion. It would be great to run this with the Wayne and Shuster image, but the hook has to connect to it. Pinging
290:
1631:
and did a hook about
Canadian comedians taking over the US, the picture could fit that. Or we could just save the picture for the Wayne & Shuster articles. –
310:
2005:
298:
1271:
1259:
88:
555:: I think you’re going to need to put the hook point with source into each of the other articles in order for them to be bolded rather than simply linked.
1267:
1274:
have tables with citations for every person; I just didn't have time to do that for the 450+ on this list. I suppose that this is technically more of a
36:
1794:
I'm good with ALT4. I'd borrowed the book used as the main source, and find that I didn't take good enough notes to improve the citation for ALT3. –
1030:
958:
As mentioned above, I don't think this page should be included in the multi-hook nomination, and neither should the non-bolded "clowns" directing to
1309:
1757:
I still like ALT4 out of all of them. The first two alts are a little scholarly for a hook. ALT3 is good, but does not have an inline cite.
1711:
are any of the hooks interesting and passable enough? If not, is there something specific that should be done to move this forward? –
1149:
no problem. I'm sure we can come up with a good hook after you fix up the article. We could leave this template open until that's resolved.
1157:
ALT1 is simply a shorter version of ALT0, and since all five articles have been checked and verified, ALT1 is good to go. I have struck
1683:
and found that there are differing, and sometimes conflicting, definitions. In line with my conception is the following definition:
1110:
Agreed with the List, struck ALT0, nominator approval for ALT1. Thanks for the reviews! Need another editor to check ALT1. –
823:
OK, but that compound modifier thing isn't clear at all. I'll try to review the rest of the hooks if someone doesn't beat me to it.
17:
268:
40:
877:
I checked the completed reviews; so far no editor has specifically stated an intention to review any of the last four. –
274:
1672:
writing some missing articles for the early history. I'm not really interested in further expanding the article at this time.
1368:
different screen widths. I might go back to crop a photo so it'll display better, but I'm pretty happy with it. –
1275:
1759:
So I'll go ahead and approve ALT4, which is an offline source but cited inline. Rest of review above. ALT4 good to go.
135:
1st
Canadian Comedy Awards, Canadian Comedy Awards, List of Canadian comedians, Peameal bacon, Poutine, Made in Canada
44:
735:
is also confusing; was the award given to all the comedians in the list? I would suggest doing a different hook for
1847:
1612:
1595:
1580:
1565:
1549:
1539:
1460:
1336:
1192:
1158:
1125:
1094:
1088:
1076:
984:
951:
895:
776:
769:
736:
732:
414:
403:
381:
259:
251:
245:
234:
140:
1432:
Thank you. The image is freely licensed. I edited the caption and "(pictured)" part. ALT2c good to go with image.
1091:– article needs more work; suggest leaving it out of the current multi-hook and proposing a different hook for it
1240:
83:
1627:
866:
I may help later today or tomorrow, - please clarify in the list of 6 above what's already under review. --
1920:
1864:
1833:
1776:
1744:
1082:
1005:
926:
917:
904:
871:
762:
594:
the other secondary articles (Made in Canada, List of Canadian comedians, Canadian Comedy Awards). –
392:
227:
113:
118:
1297:! The presentation looks much better now and the lead reads well. I suggest writing the hook this way:
1981:
1196:, along with its singers and musicians, are considered to be the country's cultural representatives?"
1016:
1852:
1266:
is a featured list, though it looks to me like it qualifies as an article. At the featured level,
1875:
1799:
1716:
1698:
1636:
1507:
1413:
1373:
1283:
1263:
1214:
1134:
1115:
1038:
1012:
882:
804:
687:
643:
631:
620:
599:
584:
562:
535:
520:
501:
482:
432:
338:
326:
but would appreciate if it can be a non-bold link (I can add a seventh review for QPQ if needed).
1966:
1916:
1896:
1886:
1860:
1788:
1765:
1661:
1523:
1490:
1437:
1397:
1361:
1342:
1166:
1104:
1001:
993:
967:
922:
900:
867:
828:
795:
788:
705:
669:
459:
198:
103:
65:
1011:
The ordinal (1st) in the title seems to be the convention with these sorts of articles (e.g.
530:
Starting review of Poutine, which is another food article so happy to pitch in there, too. --
1693:
make sense? The article touches on this in a few places and the lead summarizes it. –
474:
477:
might be good and appears in the article, though I'm not the best person to judge.) –
1977:
1743:
Would it be okay for you to please take another look at the ones that Reidgreg suggested?
1812:
1731:
1543:, along with their singers and musicians, to be the country's cultural representatives?
1347:, along with their singers and musicians, to be the country's cultural representatives?
1202:
959:
727:
There is too much linking going on in the hook. The "clowns" link looks like a link to
323:
240:
899:, substantial GA on good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. --
1999:
1871:
1819:
1795:
1780:
1712:
1694:
1650:
1632:
1513:
1465:
1409:
1386:
1369:
1294:
1279:
1210:
1144:
1130:
1111:
1070:
1034:
878:
818:
800:
756:
722:
715:
695:
683:
659:
651:
639:
627:
616:
610:, I'm not interpreting it to mean all the articles have to be connected somehow with
607:
595:
580:
570:
558:
552:
531:
516:
511:
497:
478:
449:
428:
370:
366:
355:
334:
221:
98:
1502:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
1962:
1892:
1826:
1784:
1761:
1738:
1706:
1657:
1519:
1486:
1433:
1393:
1357:
1231:
1162:
1100:
989:
963:
824:
784:
701:
679:
665:
455:
61:
1907:
1356:
Offline hook ref AGF and cited inline. Rest of my review above. ALT2c good to go.
1352:
889:
496:
Starting review of Peameal bacon, as that's one that hasn't been to GA already --
1315:
1428:
1408:
note sufficient? Also cropped the picture of Candy Palmater in the article. –
1380:
1153:
978:
911:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1783:, do you prefer ALT3, in which case you'll need an inline cite there. Thanks,
1057:
945:
731:, not to the award winner. I suggest deleting that. Linking to "comedians" as
443:
319:
656:
the hook fact only needs to be mentioned and sourced in one of the articles.
579:
to the nomination, if you wouldn't mind checking it as well. Thanks. –
123:
406:– expanded, DYK review by Yoninah: split into separate hook, good to go
1404:
I used an ampersand to keep the caption short; are the caption and the
1224:
1064:
747:
576:
545:
351:
212:
1610:
climate have given rise to dark and fatalistic humour on the part of
1547:... that Canadians popularly consider their cultural best to include
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
1599:
face taboos regarding immodesty, impoliteness, and social criticism?
1891:
all you did was turn the hook around; you can approve it. Thanks,
1883:
We need someone to approve this, and someone to promote it, ASAP.
1020:
if the eligibility period does not coincide with a calendar year).
728:
470:
921:, substantial expansion on good sources, no copyvio obvious. --
962:. Please suggest a different hook for this article. Thanks,
346:
Note that not all of the articles are ready for DYK reviews:
1569:
use individual expression to reinforce collective values?
384:– passed GA, DYK review by Gerda Arendt: good to go
395:– expanded, DYK review by Gerda Arendt: good to go
1775:
Whoops, I can't approve it because I wrote it :).
1506:
Returned from prep. Several alts have been proposed at
1476:
1470:
174:
169:
164:
159:
154:
149:
1456:: Please use this DYK credit line with the ALT2c hook:
591:
Could I have a third opinion on the bolded note above?
1278:.) Will take a look for pictures on Commons. –
273:
and "Beaver (yup, that's what the award is called)"
108:
626:
I've added the image check to the poutine review --
417:– expanded, DYK review by Yoninah: good to go
1976:I have promoted ALT1 without the image to Prep 3.
318:: Would be very happy if this can run on July 1,
469:, so they don't qualify. Commons has plenty of
1735:A new review is needed to check the new hooks.
341:). Self-nominated at 23:21, 7 June 2019 (UTC).
1911:OK, if that's the case, I'm happy to approve
8:
1260:List of countries by Human Development Index
49:No further edits should be made to this page
1845:... that the dark and fatalistic humour of
1537:that many working-class Canadians consider
1945:
1584:link comedic discontent to group survival?
1272:List of inductees of Canada's Walk of Fame
1268:List of Canadian Victoria Cross recipients
427:All articles ready for DYK review. –
322:. I was not able to significantly expand
184:
71:
1948:
1578:... that to be social acceptable, some
1029:I collapsed the nav template. (I have
187:
74:
1851:has been attributed to the dangers of
1684:
454:do you have an image to go with this?
2006:Passed DYK nominations from June 2019
7:
1606:: ... that the dangers of Canada's
24:
1870:Sure, I'm fine with that. –
18:Template:Did you know nominations
1906:
1878:) 18:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
1867:) 14:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
1811:
1730:
1501:
1427:
1379:
1351:
1308:
1200:as Shania Twain or Celine Dion"
1152:
1056:
977:
944:
910:
888:
777:inaugural Canadian Comedy Awards
442:
418:
407:
396:
385:
374:
359:
354:– passed GA. DYK review by
252:inaugural Canadian Comedy Awards
197:
1923:) 23:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
1899:) 23:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
68:) 01:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
1915:, AGF for the offline source.
1853:Canada's climate and geography
1791:) 22:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
1675:I did some more reading about
1529:Going to list the hooks here:
739:and writing the hook this way:
1:
1802:) 23:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
1768:) 22:39, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
1719:) 14:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
1664:) 19:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
1526:) 17:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
1747:00:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
1701:) 22:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
1639:) 19:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
1608:vast and sparsely populated
1400:) 09:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
1364:) 20:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
1334:... that Canadians consider
1137:) 12:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
1107:) 23:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
1008:) 07:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
885:) 13:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
874:) 12:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
791:) 19:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
708:) 19:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
690:) 17:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
646:) 17:38, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
634:) 17:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
623:) 17:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
602:) 17:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
565:) 16:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
462:) 13:09, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
1984:) 05:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
1969:) 20:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
1493:) 20:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
1440:) 13:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
1416:) 12:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
1376:) 23:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
1293:Good job on the expansion,
1286:) 20:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
1217:) 16:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
1169:) 13:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
1161:from the DYK credit lines.
1118:) 12:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
1041:) 12:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
996:) 23:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
970:) 23:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
929:) 21:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
907:) 20:31, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
831:) 20:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
807:) 20:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
672:) 17:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
587:) 17:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
538:) 15:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
523:) 15:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
504:) 14:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
485:) 13:53, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
435:) 12:04, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
2022:
1461:List of Canadian comedians
1262:has quite a bit of prose;
1159:List of Canadian comedians
1126:List of Canadian comedians
1095:1st Canadian Comedy Awards
1089:List of Canadian Comedians
1031:drafts for ceremonies 2–19
985:1st Canadian Comedy Awards
952:List of Canadian comedians
737:List of Canadian comedians
733:List of Canadian comedians
415:1st Canadian Comedy Awards
404:List of Canadian Comedians
369:– expanded, DYK review by
307:O clap your hands (Rutter)
260:1st Canadian Comedy Awards
175:Made in Canada (TV series)
160:List of Canadian comedians
150:1st Canadian Comedy Awards
1779:can you approve ALT4? Or
1250:17:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
145:( Article history links:
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
1677:cultural representatives
1628:The Canadian Conspiracy
1314:Wayne and Shuster with
575:I added a picture from
41:the article's talk page
1681:representative culture
1083:Canadian Comedy Awards
1026:written out in prose.)
918:Canadian Comedy Awards
393:Canadian Comedy Awards
155:Canadian Comedy Awards
258:Hook fact appears in
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
1593:... that in Canada,
1017:First Novelist Award
333:Created/expanded by
757:back bacon on a bun
471:pictures of poutine
303:Battle of Meligalas
222:back bacon on a bun
114:Reviewers' template
1848:Canadian comedians
1613:Canadian comedians
1581:Canadian comedians
1566:Canadian comedians
1264:1st Academy Awards
1193:Canada's comedians
1013:1st Academy Awards
760:were served while
295:Mario Alberto Peña
276:The Globe and Mail
270:The Globe and Mail
225:were served while
203:Serving of poutine
1992:
1991:
1834:Narutolovehinata5
1777:Narutolovehinata5
1745:Narutolovehinata5
1691:
1343:Wayne and Shuster
1276:set index article
1249:
1229:
1207:
1206:(source offline).
1177:
1176:
1067:– good to go
783:
342:
279:
132:
131:
2013:
1959:Note to promoter
1950:Extended content
1946:
1910:
1890:
1837:
1830:
1823:
1815:
1742:
1734:
1710:
1687:
1654:
1517:
1505:
1482:View nom subpage
1479:
1473:
1454:Note to promoter
1431:
1390:
1383:
1355:
1312:
1247:
1245:
1236:
1227:
1198:
1156:
1148:
1060:
981:
948:
914:
892:
822:
782:Sources per ALT0
781:
726:
719:
699:
663:
655:
574:
475:File:Poutine.JPG
453:
446:
422:
421:
411:
410:
400:
399:
389:
388:
378:
377:
363:
362:
332:
257:
201:
189:Extended content
185:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
2021:
2020:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2012:
2011:
2010:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1951:
1884:
1831:
1824:
1817:
1736:
1704:
1648:
1540:their comedians
1511:
1496:
1480:) –
1475:
1469:
1384:
1337:their comedians
1320:
1319:
1318:
1241:
1238:
1232:
1178:
1142:
1061:Review summary:
816:
796:Canadian clowns
766:was awarded to
720:
713:
693:
664:great picture!
657:
649:
568:
447:
419:
408:
397:
386:
375:
360:
291:Unhinged (book)
231:was awarded to
206:
205:
204:
190:
182:
181:
179:
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2019:
2017:
2009:
2008:
1998:
1997:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1971:
1970:
1953:
1952:
1949:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1901:
1900:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1770:
1769:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1702:
1673:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1623:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1601:
1586:
1571:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1495:
1494:
1484:
1464: –
1457:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1377:
1349:
1313:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1288:
1287:
1252:
1251:
1230:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1203:Anthropologica
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1150:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1098:
1092:
1086:
1080:
1077:Made in Canada
1074:
1068:
1062:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1027:
1022:
1021:
997:
972:
971:
960:Mump and Smoot
956:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
908:
896:Made in Canada
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
811:
810:
809:
808:
770:Made in Canada
740:
674:
673:
588:
540:
539:
527:
526:
525:
524:
506:
505:
489:
488:
487:
486:
467:Made in Canada
424:
423:
412:
401:
390:
382:Made in Canada
379:
364:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:Mump and Smoot
313:
281:
280:
264:Made in Canada
235:Made in Canada
202:
196:
195:
192:
191:
188:
183:
178:
177:
172:
167:
162:
157:
152:
146:
144:
141:Back to T:TDYK
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2018:
2007:
2004:
2003:
2001:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1947:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1888:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1868:
1866:
1862:
1859:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1844:
1841:
1840:
1835:
1828:
1821:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1746:
1740:
1733:
1718:
1714:
1708:
1703:
1700:
1696:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1671:
1666:
1665:
1663:
1659:
1652:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1624:
1620:
1615:
1614:
1609:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1598:
1597:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1583:
1582:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1568:
1567:
1560:
1557:
1552:
1551:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1542:
1541:
1534:
1531:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1525:
1521:
1515:
1509:
1508:WT:DYK#Prep 3
1504:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1478:
1472:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1439:
1435:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1402:
1401:
1399:
1395:
1388:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1363:
1359:
1354:
1350:
1348:
1346:
1344:
1339:
1338:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1311:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1246:
1244:
1237:
1235:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1212:
1205:
1204:
1197:
1195:
1194:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1081:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1071:Peameal bacon
1069:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1003:
998:
995:
991:
987:
986:
980:
976:
975:
974:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
954:
953:
947:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
928:
924:
920:
919:
913:
909:
906:
902:
898:
897:
891:
887:
886:
884:
880:
876:
875:
873:
869:
865:
864:
830:
826:
820:
815:
814:
813:
812:
806:
802:
797:
793:
792:
790:
786:
779:
778:
773:
772:
771:
765:
764:
759:
758:
753:
750:
749:
744:
741:
738:
734:
730:
724:
717:
712:
711:
710:
709:
707:
703:
697:
692:
691:
689:
685:
681:
678:
677:
676:
675:
671:
667:
661:
653:
648:
647:
645:
641:
636:
635:
633:
629:
625:
624:
622:
618:
613:
609:
606:
605:
604:
603:
601:
597:
592:
589:
586:
582:
578:
572:
567:
566:
564:
560:
556:
554:
547:
544:
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
528:
522:
518:
513:
512:Peameal bacon
510:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
463:
461:
457:
451:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
434:
430:
416:
413:
405:
402:
394:
391:
383:
380:
373:: good to go
372:
368:
367:Peameal bacon
365:
358:: good to go
357:
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
343:
340:
336:
325:
321:
317:
314:
312:
311:Willie Borsch
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
283:
282:
278:
277:
272:
271:
265:
261:
256:
254:
253:
248:
247:
242:
238:
237:
236:
230:
229:
224:
223:
218:
215:
214:
208:
207:
200:
194:
193:
186:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
165:Peameal bacon
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
147:
142:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1958:
1917:RebeccaGreen
1912:
1887:RebeccaGreen
1861:RebeccaGreen
1846:
1842:
1758:
1728:
1680:
1676:
1669:
1626:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1594:
1592:
1588:
1579:
1577:
1573:
1564:
1562:
1558:
1548:
1538:
1536:
1532:
1481:
1459:
1453:
1405:
1340:
1335:
1333:
1329:
1242:
1233:
1201:
1191:
1189:
1185:
1124:
1097:– good to go
1085:– good to go
1079:– good to go
1073:– good to go
1002:Gerda Arendt
983:
950:
923:Gerda Arendt
916:
901:Gerda Arendt
894:
868:Gerda Arendt
775:
768:
767:
761:
755:
751:
746:
742:
611:
590:
550:
466:
426:
425:
345:
344:
331:
315:
299:Hijabophobia
286:
275:
269:
263:
250:
244:
233:
232:
226:
220:
216:
211:
209:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
1316:Ed Sullivan
745:: ... that
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
1978:Cwmhiraeth
1406:(pictured)
982:Review of
949:Review of
763:The Beaver
752:(pictured)
320:Canada Day
228:The Beaver
217:(pictured)
1596:comedians
1563:... that
1550:comedians
1345:pictured)
1190:... that
246:comedians
210:... that
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
2000:Category
1872:Reidgreg
1820:Reidgreg
1796:Reidgreg
1781:Reidgreg
1713:Reidgreg
1695:Reidgreg
1689:UC Press
1651:Reidgreg
1633:Reidgreg
1514:Reidgreg
1466:Reidgreg
1410:Reidgreg
1387:Reidgreg
1370:Reidgreg
1295:Reidgreg
1280:Reidgreg
1211:Reidgreg
1145:Reidgreg
1131:Reidgreg
1112:Reidgreg
1035:Reidgreg
1000:blue. --
879:Reidgreg
819:Reidgreg
801:Reidgreg
723:Valereee
716:Reidgreg
696:Valereee
684:valereee
660:Reidgreg
652:Valereee
640:Reidgreg
628:valereee
617:valereee
608:Reidgreg
596:Reidgreg
581:Reidgreg
571:Valereee
559:valereee
553:Reidgreg
551:Note to
532:valereee
517:valereee
498:valereee
479:Reidgreg
450:Reidgreg
429:Reidgreg
371:Valereee
356:Valereee
335:Reidgreg
289:: six:
287:Reviewed
62:— Maile
58:promoted
1963:Yoninah
1893:Yoninah
1827:Yoninah
1785:Yoninah
1762:Yoninah
1739:Yoninah
1707:Yoninah
1658:Yoninah
1520:Yoninah
1487:Yoninah
1434:Yoninah
1394:Yoninah
1358:Yoninah
1209:–
1163:Yoninah
1101:Yoninah
1065:Poutine
990:Yoninah
964:Yoninah
825:Yoninah
785:Yoninah
774:at the
748:poutine
702:Yoninah
680:Yoninah
666:Yoninah
577:poutine
546:Poutine
456:Yoninah
352:Poutine
316:Comment
249:at the
213:poutine
170:Poutine
1535:: ...
243:, and
241:clowns
1913:ALT4a
1843:ALT4a
1670:after
1330:ALT2c
1186:ALT2B
729:Clown
16:<
1982:talk
1967:talk
1921:talk
1897:talk
1876:talk
1865:talk
1800:talk
1789:talk
1766:talk
1717:talk
1699:talk
1679:and
1662:talk
1637:talk
1604:ALT4
1589:ALT3
1574:ALT2
1559:ALT1
1533:ALT0
1524:talk
1491:talk
1471:give
1438:talk
1414:talk
1398:talk
1374:talk
1362:talk
1284:talk
1270:and
1215:talk
1167:talk
1135:talk
1123:For
1116:talk
1105:talk
1039:talk
1006:talk
994:talk
968:talk
927:talk
915:for
905:talk
893:for
883:talk
872:talk
829:talk
805:talk
789:talk
754:and
743:ALT1
706:talk
688:talk
670:talk
644:talk
632:talk
621:talk
600:talk
585:talk
563:talk
536:talk
521:talk
502:talk
483:talk
473:. (
460:talk
433:talk
339:talk
219:and
66:talk
1816:Hi
1477:tag
1474:) (
612:all
60:by
43:or
2002::
1591::
1518:.
1332::
1239:•
1225:MX
1188::
780:?
309:,
305:,
301:,
297:,
293:,
239:,
139:(
39:,
1980:(
1965:(
1919:(
1895:(
1889::
1885:@
1874:(
1863:(
1855:?
1836::
1832:@
1829::
1825:@
1822::
1818:@
1798:(
1787:(
1764:(
1741::
1737:@
1729:(
1715:(
1709::
1705:@
1697:(
1660:(
1653::
1649:@
1635:(
1616:?
1576::
1561::
1553:?
1522:(
1516::
1512:@
1489:(
1468:(
1436:(
1412:(
1396:(
1389::
1385:@
1372:(
1360:(
1341:(
1282:(
1248:)
1243:✎
1234:✉
1228:(
1213:(
1165:(
1147::
1143:@
1133:(
1114:(
1103:(
1037:(
1004:(
992:(
966:(
925:(
903:(
881:(
870:(
827:(
821::
817:@
803:(
787:(
725::
721:@
718::
714:@
704:(
698::
694:@
686:(
668:(
662::
658:@
654::
650:@
642:(
630:(
619:(
598:(
583:(
573::
569:@
561:(
534:(
519:(
500:(
481:(
458:(
452::
448:@
431:(
337:(
255:?
180:)
143:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
