403:
218:
533:
476:
for details.) In this case, it was the
February 18 at 16:27 "NFLisAwesome moved page User:ZappaOMati/2004 Subway 400 to 2004 Subway 400: Move into mainspace" item in the Revision History; such moves never change the article size or contents. It was nominated the same day as the move, so it definitely
461:
ZappaOMati, notifications to the nominator's talk page are a courtesy, not a requirement. I strongly suggest that you Assume Good Faith: 19 minutes is pretty good, all things considered, and not everyone examines their watchlist to see what might have changed in the interim. That also extends to your
326:
states, "Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace." As this was initially in my
373:
It's supposed to be deleted. It shows my alternate account moving the page into mainspace, which proves it did in fact contain the article. Also, I'm just saying that you should probably inform me immediately after posting your initial review, instead of waiting 20 minutes to do so.
282:
I'm not sure about the status of the article, new or expanded. Maybe, someone with more experience in that can help. Hook fact must be cited inline. The citation at the end of the paragraph is insufficient. BTW, I had to inform you about the DYK problem. It is not
406:
The only issue remains is whether the article is new or expanded. I have no clue about that. I kindly ask an experienced DYK reviewer to check that. @ZappaOMati, pls note that there is no time limit for calling the DYK nominator.
298:
There, added the ref. Happy now? Also, you might want to watch this page beforehand or something before actually adding it (or sending the problem right after the review, instead of waiting 19 minutes to do so).
250:
I thought pages moved to mainspace would be considered new if they're nominated within the five-day timespan between the nomination and the page being moved to mainspace. Anyway, the hook is in fact cited by
466:
required that hook facts be inline cited by the end of the sentence in the article in which the fact is contained, something you certainly ought to know by now given how long you've been participating in
93:
362:
goes nowhere. It is deleted. How do I know that the deleted link contained the article? On the other hand, you are not competent to give me advise how I have to inform you. OK? --
557:
88:
494:
for my hot-headed behavior there. I guess stress from
Presidents' Week ending got to me and all. Now can I at least get an actual review for once?
462:"There, I entered the ref. Happy now?" comment, which was inappropriate (and the edit summary "DYK reviewer insists on this" likewise). DYK has
230:
Article has not been expanded 5x since it was created. Length at creation is 1661 chars, currently it is 4513 chars long, lacking 3793 chars.
36:
17:
502:
426:
382:
339:
307:
263:
44:
359:
328:
143:
221:
Article is within neutral "Dup detector bot" reports no duplication on all the refs. Hook length is within limit.
83:
183:
205:
113:
482:
118:
472:
CeeGee, the article is considered new on the date that it moves from user space to article space. (See
477:
qualifies as new, and only needs to satisfy the usual 1,500 prose character minimum for new articles.
507:
431:
387:
344:
312:
268:
197:
40:
61:
65:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
539:
has clarified the status of the article as new. Thanks. No problems at all now. Good to go. --
491:
201:
103:
540:
536:
478:
408:
363:
288:
242:
497:
473:
421:
377:
334:
302:
258:
193:
160:
418:
I'm aware of that. However, I'd at least like a notice beforehand, just for our sanity.
402:
252:
551:
323:
98:
217:
165:
532:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
123:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
169:
331:), it was eventually moved and nominated within five days.
168:
ran only one lap before being ordered to park his car by
148:
108:
8:
255:(ref 10, which cites the entire paragraph).
49:No further edits should be made to this page
287:as you commented on your user talk page. --
71:
558:Passed DYK nominations from February 2014
74:
7:
358:Hook fact is cited now. Your link
208:) at 16:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
24:
233:Not all sources are cited inline.
18:Template:Did you know nominations
531:
485:) 04:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
401:
216:
68:) 15:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
245:20:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
1:
543:08:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
514:04:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
438:14:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
411:10:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
394:22:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
366:22:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
351:21:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
319:21:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
291:21:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
275:20:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
574:
236:Hook is not cited inline.
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
192:Moved to mainspace by
200:). Nominated by
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
184:Twitch Plays Pokémon
327:userspace (as seen
114:Reviewers' template
490:OK, I guess I'll
209:
132:
131:
565:
537:User:BlueMoonset
535:
512:
510:
505:
500:
436:
434:
429:
424:
405:
392:
390:
385:
380:
349:
347:
342:
337:
317:
315:
310:
305:
273:
271:
266:
261:
220:
191:
158:... that in the
72:
56:The result was:
34:
573:
572:
568:
567:
566:
564:
563:
562:
548:
547:
546:
508:
503:
498:
496:
432:
427:
422:
420:
388:
383:
378:
376:
345:
340:
335:
333:
313:
308:
303:
301:
269:
264:
259:
257:
161:2004 Subway 400
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
135:2004 Subway 400
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
571:
569:
561:
560:
550:
549:
545:
544:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
469:
468:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
413:
412:
398:
397:
396:
395:
368:
367:
355:
354:
353:
352:
320:
293:
292:
277:
276:
239:
238:
237:
234:
231:
225:
224:
223:
222:
189:
188:
187:
186:
174:
173:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
570:
559:
556:
555:
553:
542:
538:
534:
530:
513:
511:
506:
501:
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
484:
480:
475:
471:
470:
465:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
437:
435:
430:
425:
417:
416:
415:
414:
410:
404:
400:
399:
393:
391:
386:
381:
372:
371:
370:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
350:
348:
343:
338:
330:
325:
321:
318:
316:
311:
306:
297:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
272:
267:
262:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
244:
240:
235:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
495:
463:
419:
375:
332:
300:
284:
256:
202:NFLisAwesome
190:
179:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
479:BlueMoonset
474:WP:DYKSG#D8
166:Joe Ruttman
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
194:ZappaOMati
492:apologize
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
552:Category
180:Reviewed
58:promoted
285:awkward
541:CeeGee
464:always
409:CeeGee
364:CeeGee
324:WP:DYK
322:Also,
289:CeeGee
243:CeeGee
170:NASCAR
62:Mentoz
499:Zappa
423:Zappa
379:Zappa
336:Zappa
304:Zappa
260:Zappa
16:<
509:Mati
483:talk
467:DYK.
433:Mati
389:Mati
360:here
346:Mati
329:here
314:Mati
270:Mati
253:this
206:talk
198:talk
66:talk
60:by
43:or
554::
407:--
241:--
210:.
182::
164:,
139:(
39:,
504:O
481:(
428:O
384:O
341:O
309:O
265:O
204:(
196:(
172:?
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
