30:
93:
321:
396:
338:
356:
I've just put a notice on GregJackP's talk page. While the page says he's retired (posted
February 6), he made a couple of edits today, so I think we should allow a full week from now for a response on the issue. Alternatively, someone here could try to address the "second ICWA case" issue in the
372:
It sent me an email notice (I forgot to disable it) - my other edits were to an FA that was still in FAC when I retired. I added a sentence and ref to the U.S. Supreme Court subsection, last sentence. Hopefully this will take care of it.
341:
This article is new enough and long enough, the only problem is with the hook. I can see no mention in the article of this being the second ICWA case taken on by the
Supreme Court.
423:
61:
76:
17:
280:
218:
211:
42:
290:
228:
181:
97:
160:
48:
286:
224:
185:
362:
88:
404:
346:
381:
307:
260:
196:
329:
239:
144:
56:. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived
122:
358:
400:
342:
375:
301:
254:
192:
320:
417:
325:
235:
140:
117:
92:
29:
399:
The hook is now supported by an inline citation and this nomination is ready to go.
357:
article/sourcing, or propose a new hook that avoids the "second" part altogether.
395:
252:, my bad, sorry (I know better -facepalm- ). I like your hook, let's use it.
337:
107:. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here.
299:
I listed the current hook as Alt1 and struck the original hook.
233:
If any of my terminology is non-standard, feel free to improve.
165:
188:for only the second time in Supreme Court history?
8:
199:). Self nom at 01:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
110:No further edits should be made to this page
424:Passed DYK nominations from January 2013
37:The following is an archived discussion
7:
24:
184:has agreed to hear a case on the
18:Template:Did you know nominations
394:
336:
319:
147:) 10:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC).
91:
28:
407:) 06:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
365:) 21:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
349:) 06:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
332:) 00:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
285:is only the second case on the
223:is only the second case on the
242:) 01:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
54:Please do not modify this page
1:
387:23:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
215:somewhere. Perhaps "... that
313:20:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
281:Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
266:01:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
219:Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
212:Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
152:Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
43:Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
291:United States Supreme Court
229:United States Supreme Court
182:United States Supreme Court
440:
209:, the hook has to link to
287:Indian Child Welfare Act
225:Indian Child Welfare Act
186:Indian Child Welfare Act
118:talk page guidelines
324:Needs full review.
234:
200:
431:
398:
386:
384:
378:
340:
323:
312:
310:
304:
289:taken on by the
265:
263:
257:
232:
227:taken on by the
190:
135:The result was:
130:
113:
95:
71:, the nominated
38:
32:
439:
438:
434:
433:
432:
430:
429:
428:
414:
413:
412:
382:
376:
374:
308:
302:
300:
261:
255:
253:
172:
170:
166:Article history
154:
148:
114:
108:
36:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
437:
435:
427:
426:
416:
415:
411:
410:
409:
408:
391:
390:
389:
388:
367:
366:
351:
350:
317:
316:
315:
314:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
244:
243:
177:
176:
169:
168:
163:
161:Back to T:TDYK
157:
155:
153:
150:
133:
132:
49:DYK nomination
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
436:
425:
422:
421:
419:
406:
402:
397:
393:
392:
385:
379:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
327:
322:
311:
305:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
276:
264:
258:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
230:
226:
222:
221:
220:
214:
213:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
194:
189:
187:
183:
174:
173:
167:
164:
162:
159:
158:
151:
149:
146:
142:
138:
131:
128:
126:
120:
119:
111:
106:
105:
101:
96:
94:
90:
85:
84:
80:
74:
70:
69:
65:
59:
55:
51:
50:
45:
44:
39:
31:
27:
26:
19:
318:
279:
278:
274:
273:
249:
217:
216:
210:
206:
191:Created by
179:
178:
136:
134:
129:information.
124:
116:
109:
103:
99:
89:Did you know
87:
82:
78:
72:
67:
63:
57:
53:
47:
41:
35:
34:
359:BlueMoonset
401:Cwmhiraeth
343:Cwmhiraeth
58:nomination
377:GregJackP
303:GregJackP
256:GregJackP
193:GregJackP
180:that the
86:, or the
418:Category
326:Chris857
275:ALT1 ...
236:Chris857
141:Miyagawa
137:promoted
115:See the
383:Boomer!
309:Boomer!
262:Boomer!
250:Comment
207:Comment
73:article
380:
306:
259:
33:
277:that
16:<
405:talk
363:talk
347:talk
330:talk
240:talk
197:talk
145:talk
125:more
121:for
104:page
100:talk
83:page
79:talk
68:page
64:talk
293:?"
231:?"
175:...
139:by
75:'s
60:"s
46:'s
40:of
420::
156:(
102:)
81:)
66:)
52:.
403:(
361:(
345:(
328:(
238:(
195:(
171:)
143:(
127:)
123:(
112:.
98:(
77:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
