160:
407:
270:
614:
565:
509:
446:
347:
is very valuable scietific source which clearly differetiates "ancient wheats" (like Kamut) from "modern bread wheat" that we usually eat. Read complete doculement, they have been genetically changed over the time, search word "ancient" in it, they are also saying it is more nutritional. Journal also
273:
I'm very concerned about neutrality for this article. A lot of the statements in this article are vague and provide no context. For example, what does it mean for a grain to be 5,000 years old? How old are wheat and rice and other more widespread grains? What does "3 times higher than the average
386:
I've pruned the article to get rid of vague statements and unreliable sources. There is more than enough information in the five reliable sources that I left to build it back up to DYK length. The addition of any other reliable sources, such as the Oxford article you mentioned, would be welcome as
342:
thakns for your review and for giving me extended time. This is very interesting concept that many people don't know, thats why this deserves place in DYK. I found this article while deletion sorting at AfD and till that time I was not knowing anything about this subject. After some search I found
277:
There are some reputable popular publications included as sources (LA Times, NPR, BBC, etc.) but more than half are from blogs and organizations that seem to have a POV of advocating "natural" nutrition. The net effect of this is to make the article seem promotional, which is not consistent with
353:
311:
We don't outright oppose articles here at DYK; we provide helpful feedback and give nominators every chance to improve their articles. Rejection only occurs if the article is not made consistent with the guidelines after an extended period of time.
512:
New and long enough, neutrality and prose good after a few copyedits by me, QPQ done, no copyvios. The word "worshipped" isn't used in any of the sources, though the bit about it being banned by the
Spanish might make for a good hook.
274:
value in other grains" mean? I'd like to see a scientific source discuss protein content of grains, and their healthiness in general. Why does it matter that sales of specific grains increased a lot in a specific year?
300:
this but neither hook is cited to a neutral source and the alt hook makes a medical claim, which I think is forbidden. Also the article is promotional and lacks clarity, or even a proper definition.
93:
343:
this topic very useful and interesting. Agriculture was discivered 10,000 years ago, those grains which were grown by ancient humans in their farm are known as ancient grains, for example
410:
Just to be clear, the article is now below the length threshold required for DYK. The article needs to be expanded using reliable sources as discussed above, otherwise it will not pass.
538:
454:
541:
in the article clearly mentions that "ancient grains" were being worshipped. Moreover, one can see numerous sources after google searching "Ancient grains worshipped". --
645:
217:
226:
88:
379:
The Oxford article is a good reliable source, but it's not currently used as a citation in the
Knowledge (XXG) article, though it would be a good addition. See
356:
will clear your doubts. I am posting it here to at least convince you that it is not "hoax" or "promotional". It is one of most deserving candidate for DYK.--
159:
36:
17:
579:
524:
421:
398:
323:
289:
568:
Ah, my mistake. Looks like I misplaced that reference while copyediting. Good to go. I'll suggest one extra hook as well.
44:
428:
To clarify, the article currently has 785 prose characters, and requires a minimum of 1500 prose characters for DYK.
143:
349:
83:
113:
433:
118:
183:
are considered to be more nutritional than other grains and remained unchanged for thousands of years?
232:
created by new user, but later it was improved and AfD was withdrawn by nominator and closed as keep.
240:
552:
493:
367:
260:
252:
244:
40:
380:
337:
305:
103:
65:
429:
278:
neutrality. I'm sorry, but the article will need substantial work to be eligible for DYK.
591:
569:
542:
533:
514:
483:
471:
411:
388:
357:
344:
313:
279:
256:
248:
198:
176:
639:
618:
98:
601:
was banned by
Spanish colonial authorities due to its religious significance to the
406:
269:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
301:
61:
613:
564:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
508:
123:
595:
164:
383:
for the rationale on reliable sources on medical and health information.
602:
206:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
352:
regarding most modern wheat. There are some books like by "
229:
148:
209:-free and beneficial in controlling various diseases?
108:
478:were worshipped in various ancient civilizations?
348:talk about 10,000 years thing. You can also read
218:Template:Did you know nominations/Corinne Bennett
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
345:this Oxford Journal of Experimental Botany
71:
646:Passed DYK nominations from October 2015
74:
501: 12:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
560: 08:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
375: 19:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
7:
617:ALT3 verified to source provided.
263:) at 00:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC).
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
612:
589:... that the cultivation of the
583:) 08:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
563:
528:) 07:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
507:
444:
405:
268:
158:
425:) 21:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
308:) 12:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
293:) 19:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
68:) 17:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
436:) 22:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
402:) 23:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
327:) 18:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
1:
621:03:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
457:) will provide another hook,
453:(2332 characters, QPQ done,
37:this nomination's talk page
662:
203:(Amaranth grain pictured)
181:(Amaranth grain pictured)
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
476:(amaranth pictured)
114:Reviewers' template
167:, an ancient grain
556:
497:
371:
264:
227:nominated for AfD
132:
131:
653:
616:
567:
558:
555:
549:
546:
537:
511:
499:
496:
490:
487:
455:copyvio unlikely
452:
448:
447:
409:
373:
370:
364:
361:
341:
296:Not sure how to
272:
255:). Nominated by
238:
162:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
661:
660:
656:
655:
654:
652:
651:
650:
636:
635:
634:
582:
553:
547:
544:
531:
527:
494:
488:
485:
445:
443:
424:
401:
368:
362:
359:
335:
326:
292:
230:on this version
170:
169:
168:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
659:
657:
649:
648:
638:
637:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
607:
606:
578:
523:
480:
479:
472:ancient grains
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
438:
437:
420:
403:
397:
384:
354:Academic press
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
322:
288:
275:
236:
235:
234:
233:
225:: Article was
220:
211:
199:ancient grains
186:
185:
177:ancient grains
163:
157:
156:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
135:Ancient grains
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
658:
647:
644:
643:
641:
620:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
597:
594:
593:
592:ancient grain
588:
585:
584:
581:
576:
575:
574:
570:Antony–
566:
562:
561:
559:
557:
551:
550:
540:
535:
530:
529:
526:
521:
520:
519:
515:Antony–
510:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
500:
498:
492:
491:
477:
474:
473:
468:
465:
464:
456:
451:
442:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
423:
418:
417:
416:
412:Antony–
408:
404:
400:
395:
394:
393:
389:Antony–
385:
382:
378:
377:
376:
374:
372:
366:
365:
355:
351:
346:
339:
325:
320:
319:
318:
314:Antony–
310:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
291:
286:
285:
284:
280:Antony–
276:
271:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
231:
228:
224:
221:
219:
215:
212:
210:
208:
204:
201:
200:
193:
190:
189:
188:
187:
184:
182:
179:
178:
172:
171:
166:
161:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
598:
590:
586:
572:
571:
554:
543:
517:
516:
495:
484:
481:
475:
470:
466:
449:
414:
413:
391:
390:
369:
358:
334:
316:
315:
297:
282:
281:
237:
222:
213:
202:
197:
195:
191:
180:
175:
173:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
539:this source
430:BlueMoonset
239:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
599:(pictured)
450: Done
534:Antony-22
469:... that
381:WP:MEDPOP
338:Antony–22
257:Human3015
249:Human3015
241:Jcampsall
196:... that
174:... that
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
640:Category
596:amaranth
580:contribs
525:contribs
422:contribs
399:contribs
324:contribs
290:contribs
214:Reviewed
165:Amaranth
58:promoted
387:well.
302:Siuenti
223:Comment
62:4meter4
603:Aztecs
298:oppose
247:) and
207:gluten
587:ALT3:
545:Human
486:Human
360:Human
16:<
619:sst✈
548:3015
489:3015
467:ALT2
434:talk
363:3015
350:this
306:talk
261:talk
253:talk
245:talk
205:are
192:ALT1
66:talk
60:by
43:or
642::
577:(⁄
573:22
522:(⁄
518:22
482:--
419:(⁄
415:22
396:(⁄
392:22
321:(⁄
317:22
287:(⁄
283:22
216::
194::
139:(
39:,
605:?
536::
532:@
432:(
340::
336:@
304:(
259:(
251:(
243:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
