226:
attractive for my taste: "... common dish and food pairing in
American cuisine, the cuisine of New York City and American Jewish cuisine". - I went ahead and altered the headers, finding cuisine and mass production a contradiction in terms ;) - In the article, do we need the ref in the lead? (should better be in the body) - I'd be happier without the See also section. Can you make the note part of the text? (get's easily overlooked down there) --
160:
291:
222:
239:
ps: all entries in the further reading section appear with fat messages (to me) that they are not used as references. Do you want to use them? If not omit the ref-para. Another idea: saying in the hook "the food pairing b + cc is" might avoid the grammar confusion that after b + cc you expect "are",
259:
states that the dish "...had saturated the culture." I didn't want to use the word "saturated" because this would be close paraphrasing. When a food dish literally saturates a culture, I feel that it is worthy of inclusion in a hook, whereas omission of this would make the hook less interesting and
225:
Solid article, not many surprises, on plenty of sources, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and appetite-wetting. I am less happy with the hook. What does the "permeated" thing add? How interesting is "very popular", at whatever time? I liked some of the names, and just the lead reads more
93:
196:
294:
Please don't misunderstand; there are criteria for DYK, and there helpful comments, at least trying to be helpful. Thanks for action, I would approve even without, but
372:
256:
182:
88:
36:
264:). It's unclear why you're "unhappy" with the See also section, but I find the links useful, directly related to the topic, and on par with
17:
268:. I prefer the note where it is at, in the Notes section. The sources in the Further reading section are in full compliance with
272:, and can assist readers to learn more about the article subject. I removed the ref markup within them as suggested above (
339:"Pervaded" and "permeated" are both fine by me. I prefer "permeated". I'd rather do this than using a quote in the hook.
159:
44:
40:
210:
143:
269:
83:
327:
Other thought: we have to paraphrase in the article, but couldn't we use what the source says in the hook? --
332:
303:
245:
231:
172:
113:
341:
311:
278:
206:
118:
65:
328:
321:
299:
265:
241:
227:
179:
was very popular in the United States in the early 1950s, having permeated
American culture?
103:
252:
61:
366:
295:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
317:
290:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
221:
123:
276:), although this was not necessary for the article to qualify for DYK.
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
255:. This comes across as a GA review. Regarding the word "permeated",
260:
less informative. I removed the citations from the lead (
273:
261:
148:
108:
251:I feel that this review is way too strict, as per
213:). Self-nominated at 07:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC).
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
74:
373:Passed DYK nominations from July 2017
7:
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
289:
220:
158:
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
335:) 19:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
324:) 19:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
306:) 07:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
248:) 14:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
234:) 14:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
68:) 06:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
389:
345:08:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
282:06:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
197:Radioactive nanoparticle
164:A bagel and cream cheese
41:the article's talk page
316:how about "pervaded"?
173:bagel and cream cheese
135:Bagel and cream cheese
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
296:working for quality
114:Reviewers' template
346:
270:WP:FURTHERREADING
214:
185:
132:
131:
380:
344:
338:
315:
312:Northamerica1000
293:
281:
224:
207:Northamerica1000
204:
180:
162:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
388:
387:
383:
382:
381:
379:
378:
377:
363:
362:
361:
340:
309:
277:
167:
166:
165:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
386:
384:
376:
375:
365:
364:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
284:
283:
236:
235:
202:
201:
200:
199:
187:
186:
163:
157:
156:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
385:
374:
371:
370:
368:
343:
342:North America
337:
336:
334:
330:
326:
325:
323:
319:
313:
308:
307:
305:
301:
297:
292:
288:
287:
286:
285:
280:
279:North America
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
254:
250:
249:
247:
243:
238:
237:
233:
229:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
208:
198:
194:
191:
190:
189:
188:
183:
178:
175:
174:
170:... that the
169:
168:
161:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
329:Gerda Arendt
300:Gerda Arendt
242:Gerda Arendt
240:not "is". --
228:Gerda Arendt
203:
192:
176:
171:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
298: ;) --
205:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
266:WP:SEEALSO
257:the source
177:(pictured)
62:Cwmhiraeth
253:WP:DYKNOT
181:(Source:
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
367:Category
193:Reviewed
58:promoted
318:Yoninah
16:<
333:talk
322:talk
304:talk
274:diff
262:diff
246:talk
232:talk
211:talk
66:talk
60:by
43:or
369::
195::
139:(
39:,
331:(
320:(
314::
310:@
302:(
244:(
230:(
209:(
184:)
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
