Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/Beatrice Kerr

Source 📝

239:
reason to withhold approval); DYKcheck gives the size of the article as 2610 prose characters, far more than needed here. New reviewer needed to see whether the article does meet all DYK standards, or whether the prose issues mentioned above are sufficient to hold it back. I thought the hook was pretty interesting myself, and as nominator and author do not seem to be interested in expanding the article further, the offered ideas for other hooks would seem to be moot.
98: 207: 235: 185: 256: 160: 180: 219:
of material in that source that is not included in the article. I would encourage the author or nominator to take another look at that ref since some of that missing material could be fruitful for a more "punchier" hook such as Ms. Kerr's "Flying Honey Pot" maneuver or her "daring" 5 pound swimsuits.
218:
states that not everything in the section needs to have a reference citation there is one strong claim involving the challenges to Annette Kellerman that certainly merits a citation. One of the refs, from the Australian Dictionary of Biography, looks like it would suffice and I noticed there is a lot
238:
Claim in lead is now supported by the citation mentioned, and reworded so it doesn't go beyond what the source supports. As this is a DYK-level article, there is no requirement that MOS be fully adhered to, nor that additional material be added to the article at this time ("nice to see" is not a
259:
Everything checks out to my eyes. Article is definitely at DYK level. I agree with Agne27 that it's an interesting article, and it would be good to see it expanded in future, but it's in a good condition for the front page. Hook is interesting to me too. Go go go!
284: 210:
There are couple things that would be nice to see before this article hits the main page, mostly involving the the lead. First, the lead could use a little
188:
While new reviewers are warmly welcomed, I think it's a good idea that a review that's the second edit by a new user be rechecked prior to final approval.
164: 36: 17: 223: 44: 81: 214:
work and some paragraph break. Right now it looks a little jumbled with several awkward sentences. Also, while
140: 168: 97: 244: 193: 136: 40: 29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
240: 226: 189: 148: 65: 215: 234: 184: 278: 263: 211: 107: 206: 220: 144: 61: 255: 159: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
179: 115: 105:... that while performing as "Australia's Champion Lady Swimmer and Diver", 47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 86: 8: 49:No further edits should be made to this page 163:- Length, date, sourcing, hook all check. 285:Passed DYK nominations from October 2012 7: 24: 151:) at 20:50, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 18:Template:Did you know nominations 254: 233: 205: 183: 178: 158: 96: 247:) 22:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 68:) 00:01, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify this page. 196:) 14:22, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 171:) 12:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1: 268:10:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 228:06:19, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 45:Knowledge talk:Did you know 37:this nomination's talk page 301: 128:: Not a self nomination 41:the article's talk page 135:Created/expanded by 118:boys from drowning? 152: 143:). Nominated by 292: 258: 237: 209: 187: 182: 162: 134: 100: 56:The result was: 34: 300: 299: 295: 294: 293: 291: 290: 289: 275: 274: 273: 102: 93: 91: 87:Article history 75: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 298: 296: 288: 287: 277: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 249: 248: 230: 229: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 173: 172: 165:69.237.151.243 137:IgnorantArmies 132: 131: 130: 129: 120: 119: 94: 90: 89: 84: 82:Back to T:TDYK 78: 76: 74: 71: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 297: 286: 283: 282: 280: 267: 266: 265: 257: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 236: 232: 231: 227: 224: 222: 217: 213: 208: 204: 203: 195: 191: 186: 181: 177: 176: 175: 174: 170: 166: 161: 157: 156: 155: 154: 153: 150: 146: 142: 138: 127: 124: 123: 122: 121: 117: 113: 110: 109: 108:Beatrice Kerr 104: 103: 101: 99: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 73:Beatrice Kerr 72: 70: 67: 63: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 262: 261: 133: 125: 111: 106: 95: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 241:BlueMoonset 190:BlueMoonset 114:saved two 112:(pictured) 116:Blackpool 279:Category 264:Moswento 58:promoted 216:WP:LEAD 126:Comment 212:WP:MOS 145:Allen3 62:Orlady 16:< 245:talk 221:Agne 194:talk 169:talk 149:talk 141:talk 66:talk 60:by 43:or 281:: 77:( 39:, 243:( 225:/ 192:( 167:( 147:( 139:( 92:) 64:( 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge talk:Did you know
Orlady
talk
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Beatrice Kerr
Beatrice Kerr
Blackpool
IgnorantArmies
talk
Allen3
talk

69.237.151.243
talk


BlueMoonset
talk

WP:MOS
WP:LEAD
Agne



BlueMoonset

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.