30:
177:
93:
462:
235:
318:
375:
city so did not removed. Source No.6 is a blogpost but I did not removed it as there is an Image in blogpost which shows plaque situated at Bhadra Fort telling an important truth about its etymology which is rarely recorded in history. All other websites are
Government official websites. Others are
238:
New article that was moved into mainspace from sandbox. Was 6,182 characters at the time of move and still is. Ref 22 (the source supporting the hook) is from the Times of India, so reliable and verifiable. Entire article is well-sourced. Hook is interesting and is 112 characters long, so below
300:
I wasn't actually addressing you specifically, though when I read my comment in context, it does look like I'm responding to you calling the Times of India a reliable source. Nevertheless, I think one third of an article being based on unreliable sources (assuming they are all unreliable, I don't
391:
If this were an FA or GA nomination, I would also insist on that photo of the plaque being removed from the sources, since I don't think it's an appropriate source. Here, the standards are a little lower, however, so I'll let it pass. Those websites promoting tourism, however, are clearly
336:
All unreliable sources are website sources and the most of them are additional sources to support an information of reliable sources. Removal of those unreliable web sources may not affect much to an article. Only small amount of content is
513:
222:
256:
I'm uncertain about the reliability of the sources cited in footnotes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 21, and 26. Could you explain why you think they're reliable?--
392:
inappropriate. It's completely unclear what sort of expertise the writers of those texts have, so I don't think they qualify as reliable.--
356:
Unless there is reason to believe that these sources are reliable, I'd suggest removing them as well as any material based only on them.--
61:
17:
407:
I am removing those unreliable tourism websites. One of them is run by an author who have written city guides and many books on
445:
Carabinieri, can I ask you to give the final approval tick when you're satisfied that all the sourcing is reliable? Thanks.
176:
97:
160:
415:. Still I am removing them as it does not affect the content. I added a news source instead of it. Now is it OK?--
48:
470:
450:
435:
397:
361:
326:
306:
261:
144:
88:
420:
381:
346:
208:
371:
All additional unreliable sources removed. Source no.5 and 16 are websites dedicated to tourism in
290:
244:
285:
of the article's sources (19 of 28) are indeed reliable without question, I'm letting this pass. —
56:. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived
122:
466:
446:
431:
393:
357:
322:
302:
257:
140:
76:
416:
377:
342:
204:
286:
240:
507:
117:
92:
29:
412:
190:
42:
461:
234:
317:
408:
372:
195:
321:
Nomination should not be promoted while this issue is being discussed.
341:
based on unreliable sources. Should I remove them or leave as it is?--
107:. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here.
239:
the 200 character limit. QPQ done. Looks good to go. —
165:
271:
I never said they were reliable. I said the source
223:Template:Did you know nominations/P. Shilu Ao
8:
211:). Self nom at 07:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
110:No further edits should be made to this page
194:, was the first electrical connection of
514:Passed DYK nominations from January 2013
37:The following is an archived discussion
7:
275:is reliable. And since more than
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
460:
316:
233:
175:
147:) 22:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC).
91:
28:
473:) 22:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
453:) 00:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
438:) 18:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
423:) 19:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
400:) 14:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
384:) 10:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
364:) 16:38, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
349:) 10:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
329:) 16:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
309:) 15:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
293:) 11:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
264:) 01:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
247:) 23:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
54:Please do not modify this page
1:
376:news or book references. --
530:
465:Yes, of course, sorry.--
184:... that a tower clock
301:know) is a problem. --
118:talk page guidelines
430:Looks good to me.--
212:
521:
464:
320:
284:
283:
279:
237:
202:
179:
135:The result was:
130:
113:
95:
71:, the nominated
38:
32:
529:
528:
524:
523:
522:
520:
519:
518:
504:
503:
502:
281:
277:
276:
181:
172:
170:
166:Article history
154:
148:
114:
108:
36:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
527:
525:
517:
516:
506:
505:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
455:
454:
440:
439:
425:
424:
402:
401:
386:
385:
366:
365:
351:
350:
331:
330:
311:
310:
295:
294:
266:
265:
249:
248:
230:
229:
228:
227:
225:
200:
199:
173:
169:
168:
163:
161:Back to T:TDYK
157:
155:
153:
150:
133:
132:
49:DYK nomination
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
526:
515:
512:
511:
509:
472:
468:
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
390:
389:
388:
387:
383:
379:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
319:
315:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
274:
270:
269:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
236:
232:
231:
226:
224:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
210:
206:
197:
193:
192:
187:
183:
182:
180:
178:
167:
164:
162:
159:
158:
151:
149:
146:
142:
138:
131:
128:
126:
120:
119:
111:
106:
105:
101:
96:
94:
90:
85:
84:
80:
74:
70:
69:
65:
59:
55:
51:
50:
45:
44:
39:
31:
27:
26:
19:
338:
273:for the hook
272:
218:
203:Created by
201:
189:
185:
174:
136:
134:
129:information.
124:
116:
109:
103:
99:
89:Did you know
87:
82:
78:
72:
67:
63:
57:
53:
47:
41:
35:
34:
467:Carabinieri
447:BlueMoonset
432:Carabinieri
394:Carabinieri
358:Carabinieri
323:BlueMoonset
303:Carabinieri
258:Carabinieri
191:Bhadra Fort
152:Bhadra Fort
141:Carabinieri
43:Bhadra Fort
411:city. See
205:Nizil Shah
186:(pictured)
58:nomination
409:Ahmedabad
373:Ahmedabad
287:Bloom6132
241:Bloom6132
196:Ahmedabad
86:, or the
508:Category
219:Reviewed
137:promoted
115:See the
280:⁄
73:article
339:solely
33:
417:Nizil
413:Books
378:Nizil
343:Nizil
16:<
471:talk
451:talk
436:talk
421:talk
398:talk
382:talk
362:talk
347:talk
327:talk
307:talk
291:talk
262:talk
245:talk
209:talk
145:talk
125:more
121:for
104:page
100:talk
83:page
79:talk
68:page
64:talk
188:at
139:by
75:'s
60:"s
46:'s
40:of
510::
221::
156:(
102:)
81:)
66:)
52:.
469:(
449:(
434:(
419:(
396:(
380:(
360:(
345:(
325:(
305:(
289:(
282:3
278:2
260:(
243:(
207:(
198:?
171:)
143:(
127:)
123:(
112:.
98:(
77:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
