360:
238:
256:
293:," after all.) In as much as the reference sections can hardly be called unreferenced, it seems to me that they are in conformity with the essential requirement for appropriate citation (in fact, it's hard to see how to incorporate inline citations in those sections without seeming a trifle ridiculous and perhaps
276:
Thank you, Secretlondon, for your review. I've added inline citations to make sure that every paragraph in the main prose part of the article has citations. With regard to the reference sections, I wonder if this is a place where we should let
378:
Great! Since I too prefer ALT4, I will strike out all the others so as to encourage the usage of ALT4. Of course, if ALT4 has unexpected problems, then the prep editors could always use ALT3.
127:: Although I prefer my primary suggested hook (above), here are some alternative hooks (variations on a theme) that could be used if the primary suggested hook is regarded as inadequate:
417:
316:
of one inline citation per para. I certainly wouldn't pass anything without that. Linking at the top of the works section to an article with a list of works?
119:
282:
36:
380:
Also, here's a spontaneous thought: Since the hook is partly about food/cooking, and since US Thanksgiving is only 3 days away, why don't we
17:
286:
331:
OK, the article now includes inline citations for every paragraph in the "Works" sections. Please note that the article does
339:
be complete - I think I included everything that came up in online searches). So please take another peek. Many thanks. --
44:
335:
claim that any of these lists are complete and inclusive of everything she's ever published (although I suppose they
79:
40:
368:
321:
264:
246:
297:, although if you see a straightforward way to proceed, I'm open to it). What do you think? Thanks --
394:
344:
302:
221:
192:
175:
158:
141:
103:
215:
169:
152:
135:
97:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
364:
317:
260:
278:
242:
390:
340:
298:
294:
259:
Every paragraph needs a reference. There are also no references for the list of works.
188:
359:
237:
411:
290:
208:
Another hook, that I'd be inclined to use as more interesting than the first 4, is:
62:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
255:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
162:(1976), recently described as a "renowned countercultural cookbook"?
225:, has also written books on spirituality, mysticism, and feminism?
145:, recently described as a "renowned countercultural cookbook"?
107:, recently described as a "renowned countercultural cookbook"?
179:, described in 2009 as a "renowned countercultural cookbook"?
289:
seem to call the inline citation requirement simply a "
84:
219:, coauthor of the "renowned countercultural cookbook"
363:
This is okay now. ALT3 and ALT4, but I prefer ALT4.
384:run this hook on US Thanksgiving (Thu 22 Nov)
8:
195:). Self nom at 21:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
120:Template:Did you know nominations/Ralph Garr
49:No further edits should be made to this page
418:Passed DYK nominations from October 2012
7:
66: 13:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
371:) 22:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
358:
254:
236:
397:) 04:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
347:) 01:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
324:) 22:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
305:) 19:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
267:) 16:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
249:) 19:00, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
434:
312:The rule of thumb is a
41:the article's talk page
187:Created/expanded by
389: --
216:Carol Lee Flinders
170:Carol Lee Flinders
153:Carol Lee Flinders
136:Carol Lee Flinders
133:... that in 1976,
98:Carol Lee Flinders
71:Carol Lee Flinders
241:Needs reviewing.
196:
425:
362:
281:take over? (The
258:
240:
222:Laurel's Kitchen
186:
176:Laurel's Kitchen
159:Laurel's Kitchen
142:Laurel's Kitchen
104:Laurel's Kitchen
56:The result was:
34:
433:
432:
428:
427:
426:
424:
423:
422:
408:
407:
406:
388:
381:
379:
209:
163:
146:
128:
91:
89:
85:Article history
73:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
431:
429:
421:
420:
410:
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
326:
325:
307:
306:
269:
268:
252:
251:
250:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
203:
202:
184:
183:
182:
181:
122:
110:
109:
88:
87:
82:
80:Back to T:TDYK
76:
74:
72:
69:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
430:
419:
416:
415:
413:
396:
392:
386:
385:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
370:
366:
361:
357:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:rule of thumb
288:
287:citation page
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
257:
253:
248:
244:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
224:
223:
218:
217:
212:
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
190:
180:
178:
177:
172:
171:
166:
161:
160:
155:
154:
149:
144:
143:
138:
137:
131:
126:
123:
121:
117:
114:
113:
112:
111:
108:
106:
105:
100:
99:
93:
92:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
383:
382:
365:Secretlondon
336:
332:
318:Secretlondon
313:
295:bureaucratic
279:common sense
261:Secretlondon
220:
214:
210:
185:
174:
168:
164:
157:
151:
147:
140:
134:
132:
129:
124:
115:
102:
96:
94:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
243:BlueMoonset
173:coauthored
156:coauthored
139:coauthored
101:coauthored
391:Presearch
341:Presearch
299:Presearch
283:DYK Guide
213:... that
189:Presearch
167:... that
150:... that
95:... that
412:Category
285:and its
116:Reviewed
58:promoted
314:minimum
125:Comment
63:Allen3
337:might
211:ALT4:
165:ALT3:
148:ALT2:
130:ALT1:
16:<
395:talk
369:talk
345:talk
322:talk
303:talk
265:talk
247:talk
193:talk
333:not
60:by
43:or
414::
118::
75:(
39:,
393:(
387:?
367:(
343:(
320:(
301:(
263:(
245:(
191:(
90:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
