206:
269:
301:
217:
As for the hooks however...the first one is too bland (and the low first season ratings claim isn't actually sourced), the second has nothing to do with the season itself and is probably true of the majority of
Paramount projects at the time, and the third is not quite sourced in the article (similar
209:
First, apologies if I misformat or don't hit everything that's necessary--this is my first DYK review. Article is of sufficient length and moved into mainspace within 5 days prior to submission. There was some non-neutral language in the article, but I think I've removed most of it. I personally find
255:
I know the first is not "unusual", but it is a strong claim to high quality, and to me is enough. The second combines two separate sourced facts from the article; I assume this is okay, but if it has to arise out of a singular sourced statement, it could be modified.
210:
some of the episode synopses to be too long, while others are too short, but that's a matter for editorial discretion. Overall, the article seems to be well-written, comprehensive, and well-sourced. It could likely qualify as a
272:
I don't know; removing things, like one paragraph or one partial sentence, may be deemed to me as more than mere copyediting. Also, you made two alternative hooks, so another reviewer may be needed, unless I'm wrong.
169:
324:
218:
things are said, but no specific mention is made that they "did not regret" the pairing. Personally, I'd suggest something more like one of the following:
36:
17:
44:
79:
40:
231:
309:
278:
196:
289:
261:
137:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
246:
226:
158:
126:
110:
105:
305:
95:
274:
214:
given a little more work on the prose and a more careful balancing of the episode list.
192:
268:
205:
318:
285:
257:
241:
153:
211:
62:
300:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
156:
together, despite negative reviews and huge breakup between them in finale of
250:
because it lasted too long and presented a poor relationship role model?
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
148:
132:
100:
240:... that several reviewers criticized the romance between
84:
304:
Alt4 seems the most hooky. Date and length also OK.
199:). Self nom at 07:09, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
325:Passed DYK nominations from September 2012
177:: This article was created as a sandbox a
184:. It moved to mainspace on September 18.
284:That would be completely fine by me.
7:
152:producers did not regret on pairing
66: 10:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
136:set survived fire that struck the
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
299:
267:
204:
306:The C of E. God Save The Queen!
32:Please do not modify this page.
312:) 10:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
281:) 00:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
264:) 00:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
1:
292:) 23:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
182:(actually) several weeks ago
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
341:
247:second season of Cheers
227:second season of Cheers
41:the article's talk page
124::... that, during its
232:Primetime Emmy Awards
191:Created/expanded by
170:Mayday (Lecrae song)
200:
159:the second season
138:Paramount Studios
71:Cheers (season 2)
332:
303:
271:
208:
190:
108:but high in the
104:were low in the
56:The result was:
34:
340:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
330:
329:
315:
314:
313:
96:Nielsen ratings
91:
89:
85:Article history
73:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
338:
336:
328:
327:
317:
316:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
253:
252:
251:
235:
215:
188:
187:
186:
185:
179:few months ago
172:
163:
141:
116:
115:
88:
87:
82:
80:Back to T:TDYK
76:
74:
72:
69:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
337:
326:
323:
322:
320:
311:
307:
302:
291:
287:
283:
282:
280:
276:
270:
266:
265:
263:
259:
254:
249:
248:
243:
242:Sam and Diane
239:
236:
233:
229:
228:
224:... that the
223:
220:
219:
216:
213:
207:
203:
202:
201:
198:
194:
183:
180:
176:
173:
171:
167:
164:
161:
160:
155:
154:Sam and Diane
151:
150:
145:
142:
139:
135:
134:
129:
128:
127:second season
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
103:
102:
97:
93:
92:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
245:
237:
225:
221:
212:good article
189:
181:
178:
174:
165:
157:
147:
143:
131:
125:
121:
109:
106:first season
99:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
146::... that
275:George Ho
230:won four
193:George Ho
94:... that
319:Category
286:Qwyrxian
258:Qwyrxian
166:Reviewed
58:promoted
244:in the
175:Comment
149:Cheers
133:Cheers
130:, the
111:second
101:Cheers
63:Allen3
16:<
310:talk
290:talk
279:talk
262:talk
238:ALT4
222:ALT3
197:talk
144:ALT2
122:ALT1
98:of
60:by
43:or
321::
273:--
168::
75:(
39:,
308:(
288:(
277:(
260:(
234:?
195:(
162:?
140:?
114:?
90:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
