369:
282:
491:
298:
355:
I strongly prefer the other hook, it is more direct in defining the article subject. If they want all the details they can click the link and read the article. However, enough time has passed that we should not assume readers know what the Soviet Union was, many of them were not even born when it
268:
I don't know if this effects the DYK nomination at all, but the page's creator has been blocked as a sock used to avoid scrutiny. A bunch of users worked on this page though, and it still seems like a good candidate for DYK regardless. Just not sure how DYK prefers to "give credit" in a case like
498:
is under consideration here: short and informative enough, alt6 counts only as a fringe opinion and alt5 is hardly telling us anything. Hook alt4 is covered in article, referenced and confirmed. good to go.
285:
I think this can still pass, notable subject and the like. As the sock master was blocked for copyright issues, this needs to be looked at thoroughly. BTW, Beeblebrox seems to deserve a credit. —
372:
I agree: ALT3 is too talky and explanatory: I'm bored long before it's done saying what the speech wasn't. Still need a reviewer to examine the entire article and its original hook; I've struck ALT3.
521:
36:
156:
Maybe the hook should be more specific, I.e. "encouraged
Ukranians not to leave the Soviet Union in a 1991 speech in Kiev, later dubbed the
356:
broke up, we should probably link that as well. (member of the last generation taught cold-war paranoia in school, I feel so old...)
209:
17:
465:
405:
494:
Article review: big enoug, new enough, cited enough, free of copyright infringement, and does not appear biased. Hook
44:
81:
504:
389:
Just a thought, maybe a more concise hook (that also puts the target article up front) might be something like:
40:
377:
290:
202:
65:
500:
361:
274:
165:
460:
437:
399:
316:
254:
190:
157:
146:
138:
111:
346:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
408:
102:
481:
373:
286:
198:
61:
357:
301:
Can I suggest a different hook? The current one isn't particularly interesting. How about:
270:
161:
329:
250:
186:
178:
142:
134:
368:
281:
515:
213:
174:
98:
432:
412:
321:
182:
106:
477:
490:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
297:
325:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
332:'s attempt to discourage Ukrainians from seeking independence?
247:
86:
173:thank you, I like that! I changed it from: "that
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
464:"may have been the worst speech ever" by a
249:for what Mandarax did, thank you Mandarax.
109:in a 1991 speech in Kiev, later dubbed the
522:Passed DYK nominations from December 2012
411:encouraged Ukraine to remain within the
197:Note: I've added a credit template for
105:encouraged Ukranians not to leave the
7:
181:Sr. discouraged the break up of the
342:What do you think? Otherwise, OK.
24:
149:) at 18:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
126:: New article - interesting topic
18:Template:Did you know nominations
489:
367:
364:) 18:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
296:
280:
422:or even something quirky like:
293:) 01:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
193:) 20:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
507:) 10:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
352:17:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
277:) 19:39, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
257:) 21:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
168:) 18:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
68:) 04:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
1:
484:) 22:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
380:) 02:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
242:20:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
449:or something more pointed:
160:?" or something like that.
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
538:
328:, but was U.S. President
41:the article's talk page
431:... that there was no
324:, nor about anyone's
133:Created/expanded by
322:popular chicken dish
461:Chicken Kiev speech
438:Chicken Kiev speech
400:Chicken Kiev speech
317:Chicken Kiev Speech
158:Chicken Kiev speech
112:Chicken Kiev speech
73:Chicken Kiev speech
320:was not about the
238:
234:
222:
218:
150:
141:). Nominated by
529:
493:
397:... that in the
371:
351:
300:
284:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
220:
216:
199:Dream Focus
132:
56:The result was:
34:
537:
536:
532:
531:
530:
528:
527:
526:
512:
511:
510:
501:Graeme Bartlett
343:
330:George Bush Sr.
231:
226:
214:
196:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
535:
533:
525:
524:
514:
513:
509:
508:
486:
485:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
303:
302:
294:
278:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
170:
169:
130:
129:
128:
127:
118:
117:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
534:
523:
520:
519:
517:
506:
502:
497:
492:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
469:
467:
463:
462:
458:... that the
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
448:
442:
440:
439:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
423:
421:
414:
410:
407:
403:
401:
396:
393:
392:
391:
390:
388:
387:
379:
375:
370:
366:
365:
363:
359:
354:
353:
349:
348:
341:
340:
333:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
314:... that the
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
299:
295:
292:
288:
283:
279:
276:
272:
267:
266:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
241:
224:
211:
208:
204:
200:
195:
194:
192:
188:
185:?" to yours.
184:
180:
176:
175:United States
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
144:
140:
136:
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
116:
114:
113:
108:
104:
100:
99:United States
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
495:
466:US President
459:
455:
454:
436:
433:chicken kiev
428:
427:
413:Soviet Union
406:US President
398:
394:
344:
315:
311:
310:
206:
183:Soviet Union
131:
123:
110:
107:Soviet Union
96:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
476:Any good?
409:George Bush
374:BlueMoonset
287:Crisco 1492
179:George Bush
103:George Bush
62:BlueMoonset
358:Beeblebrox
271:Beeblebrox
177:President
162:Beeblebrox
101:President
326:cowardice
251:Spoildead
187:Spoildead
143:Spoildead
135:Spoildead
97:... that
516:Category
210:contribs
58:promoted
435:in the
201: (
124:Comment
478:EdChem
350:
347:danjel
345:˜
269:this.
229:
225:
205:
456:ALT6:
429:ALT5:
404:then-
395:ALT4:
246:See:
16:<
505:talk
496:ALT4
482:talk
378:talk
362:talk
312:ALT3
291:talk
275:talk
255:talk
233:XAЯA
221:ARAX
203:talk
191:talk
166:talk
147:talk
139:talk
66:talk
212:).
60:by
43:or
518::
237:ИA
217:AN
77:(
39:,
503:(
480:(
468:?
441:?
415:?
402:,
376:(
360:(
289:(
273:(
253:(
239:M
235:b
227:•
219:d
215:M
207:·
189:(
164:(
145:(
137:(
115:?
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.