435:"In 1952, Anderson carried out some remedial work on the murals but requested that no further work be done during her lifetime. She died in 1958. By the 1980s the murals had deteriorated so much that the chapel had to be closed. Large sections of the paint were being lost as a result of crystalline salts on the wall surface forcing off the painted plaster and gold leaf. With a grant from the Heritage Council of New South Wales, the chapel was restored in 1992 with work done by skilled conservators under the aegis of International Conservation Services." – this is sourced to
399:
137:
161:. Were it removed, it would be easy to move the image of Mary and the infant Jesus to the right, thus eliminating the jarring contrast between it and the wider quote box below (And while I understand what was being thought by making the boxes gold, I seem to recall that adding any background color without a very, very good reason is also an MOS no-no).
444:
471:
This source lists pages 3–24 as verifying the material. Page ranges of over 20 pages make checking sources difficult. The citations should be broken down into small ranges of no more than two pages if the information is spread out through 20 pages. Based on my spotchecks, the last two sources of the
314:
I have moved the quote box to the right and the main image to the left. I prefer to have the Mary and Jesus image separated from the gallery ones because it is an individual composition and also one of the best paintings in the set. Is this arrangement satisfactory, do you think? And also, I don't
366:
Wow! Wonderful! Thanks for this Orlady. I'll add this reference (and also go to the library to borrow the book). On another point, I have taken two other pictures that clearly show the unfinished
Harbour Bridge on the mural and I would like to add them to the gallery on the article since the text
367:
specifically refers to that imagery. However, I do not know how to put the four related pictures in a row underneath the other two (that is, arrange two rows of pictures in the gallery). Does one of you (Daniel or Orlady) have the time to explain this to me so I can do it? Thanks
245:
The reader can now more easily related the renamed "imagery" section to the lines in the text of the carol - which I believe is necessary to show alongside the images of the murals as they are illustrative. I've also removed the gold colour of the quote
157:" are unnecessary to the article, especially when we have an article that I just linked to but the article itself does not. Thus it is doubly troubling that the box they have been put in squeezes the text next to it ... rather against
272:
I've included a brilliant reference for the conservation section (the
Diakowska-Czarnota article) which I will use to develop the article further, but for the moment it greatly increases the verifiability of the article and DYK
332:
Much better. Is there any sort of source we could find for the "Imagery" section, like some sort of guide? I suppose we could say this is verifiable by walking inside, but we do need to try.
40:
36:
219:
Your prompting on the full text of the carol made me realise that I had the title wrong. Now with the correct title we see that there is no article for that specific carol.
496:
90:
445:"Conservation and restoration of the mural paintings from the Children's Chapel in the Church of St James, King Street, Sydney: looking for the method of transfer"
408:
Pictures of children and of yachts on the harbour, taken by the well-known photographer Harold
Cazneaux, were used by the artists to help with details of the scene
419:
Pictures of children and of yachts on the harbour taken by the well-known photographer Harold
Cazneaux were used by the artists to help with details of the scene
193:
I've rewritten the text that the hook refers to, to make the link to illuminated manuscript explicit. In doing so I've also removed that quote box.
150:
And even given that, the article is underreferenced. The entire "Artists" section is unsourced, as is the last several sentences of "Conservation".
17:
228:
Good catch, although nothing, of course, would stop us from actually starting one as well. But that's something for another DYK.
255:
I still would like to see the text of the carol not squeezing the article text. Could it be on the right below Mary and Jesus?
436:
111:: This week I wrote this article at the same time as its parent but it grew too big and so I created it as a new article.
44:
73:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
315:
know how to make the gallery into two rows. Thanks for your assistance with this. The comments were very helpful.
372:
345:
320:
283:
123:
140:
History and length are OK. But nowhere in the article does the text actually say it's painted to resemble an
141:
95:
153:
The layout is clunky, too. Even though it is in the public domain, I submit that the complete lyrics of "
337:
298:
260:
233:
207:
190:
This feedback has been very helpful, thank you Daniel! I've tried to address your points. Specifically:
169:
368:
341:
316:
279:
119:
472:
article are verified by page 19 of the source, though I am not sure about the preceding sentences.
477:
202:
Good. Sorry to take so long to review this; I had a busy weekend with limited
Internet access.
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
352:
154:
481:
360:
333:
294:
256:
229:
203:
165:
437:
http://www.sjks.org.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=82&Itemid=60
278:
Please advise if these changes are sufficient for accepting this as a DYK. Sincerely,
490:
145:
398:
148:
and then know enough to make that inference. Perhaps the hook should be more direct.
136:
356:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
158:
144:. A reader would have to chance across the box with the quote referencing the
57:
449:
Australian
Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Materials Bulletin
293:
I think once we do something about the quote box placement, we're good.
340:) 03:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC) Yes, you can walk inside :)
432:
The second paragraph of the "Imagery" section is unsourced.
78:
429:, then under construction and of harbour landmarks."
351:
I found a partial description of the images in this
443:Diakowska-Czarnota, Anna; Werstak, Arek (1994).
412:as were photographs of the Sydney Harbour Bridge
64:
8:
126:). Self nom at 04:32, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
65:Children's Chapel, St James' Church, Sydney
497:Failed DYK nominations from October 2011
439:, which does not verify the information.
402:Close paraphrasing and sourcing issues:
7:
24:
427:photographs of the harbour bridge
18:Template:Did you know nominations
397:
135:
484:) 22:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
363:) 19:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
301:) 17:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
263:) 17:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
236:) 17:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
210:) 17:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
172:) 18:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
1:
414:and other harbour landmarks."
348:23:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
286:03:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
60:18:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
375:23:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
323:01:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
164:In short, this needs work.
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
513:
32:Please do not modify it.
41:the article's talk page
142:illuminated manuscript
96:illuminated manuscript
88:... that there is a
155:I Saw Three Ships
127:
504:
464:
462:
460:
401:
353:this Google book
139:
117:
94:painted like an
91:chapel in Sydney
52:The result was:
34:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
487:
486:
485:
458:
456:
442:
102:
85:
83:
79:Article history
67:
61:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
500:
499:
489:
488:
476:
475:
474:
473:
466:
465:
440:
433:
430:
415:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
305:
304:
303:
302:
276:
275:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
248:
247:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
221:
220:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
195:
194:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
120:Whiteghost.ink
115:
114:
113:
112:
100:
99:
82:
81:
76:
74:Back to T:TDYK
70:
68:
66:
63:
50:
49:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
498:
495:
494:
492:
483:
479:
470:
469:
468:
467:
454:
450:
446:
441:
438:
434:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
400:
374:
370:
365:
364:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
322:
318:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
300:
296:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
285:
281:
277:
271:
270:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
244:
243:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
217:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
191:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
173:
171:
167:
162:
160:
156:
151:
147:
146:Book of Kells
143:
138:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
121:
110:
107:
106:
105:
104:
103:
97:
93:
92:
87:
86:
80:
77:
75:
72:
71:
62:
59:
55:
48:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
457:. Retrieved
452:
448:
426:
422:
418:
411:
407:
396:
163:
152:
149:
118:Created by
116:
108:
101:
89:
53:
51:
31:
28:
455:(3–4): 3–24
334:Daniel Case
295:Daniel Case
273:worthiness.
257:Daniel Case
230:Daniel Case
204:Daniel Case
166:Daniel Case
459:12 October
406:Article: "
369:Whiteghost
342:Whiteghost
317:Whiteghost
280:Whiteghost
159:MOS:IMAGES
417:Source: "
491:Category
54:rejected
423:as were
109:Comment
478:Cunard
357:Orlady
425:also
58:Panyd
16:<
482:talk
461:2011
361:talk
355:. --
338:talk
299:talk
261:talk
246:box.
234:talk
208:talk
170:talk
124:talk
373:ink
346:ink
321:ink
284:ink
56:by
43:or
493::
453:19
451:.
447:.
421:,
410:,
69:(
39:,
480:(
463:.
371:.
359:(
344:.
336:(
319:.
297:(
282:.
259:(
232:(
206:(
168:(
122:(
98:?
84:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
