326:
the next few days. I am not sure why the house of commons report would fail to meet notability requirements, it gives him a pretty good write up along with the
Patrick Foundation, from which the article was primarily based. If you read my userpage you'll perhaps understand that conflict of interest, I have met Edmund, and conducted the original survey of a 1 mile, straight, rock-cut trench leading to the source of the
401:
156:
196:, but that article itself offers scant evidence of notability: only 3 secondary references, all by the same journalist in the same newspaper within 2 months of each other (Geoff Ward, in the Western Daily Press). Similarly, the article on Marriage himself uses the same 3 Geoff Ward secondary sources plus a passing mention in an
232:
In several places the sentence structure is convoluted. Even the lead sentence "Edmund
Marriage (born 28 February 1941) is the director of the Patrick Foundation and British Wildlife Management, an independent researcher, lobbyist and lecturer" is poor grammar, and it is also self-contradictory. (Is
325:
Fantastic job reviewing the article BrownHairedGirl. Thanks. It needed looking at by someone who knows the rules better than me. I'll sort out the peacocking and try to change the text significantly from the justenergyradio site and try to improve the article according to your recommendations over
346:
and getting the records of human culture straight, purely in the interest of the benefit of mankind. Whilst appreciating the guidance, I excuse myself from writing COI articles on the grounds that I have no personal or financial motivation and have exterminated greed from my personality in this
288:
are the same evidence section of a House of
Commons Select Committee report to which the Patrick Foundation made a submission, and the ctte reprinted the submission in full along with all the other submissions. None of the other 4 appear to be reliable sources ... but one of them is
124:
227:"His notable research amongst a range of submissions" (who says its notable? Any source for that value judgement, or evidence of its notability, such as citation details)
224:"has attended as a partner the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs "Partnership Against Wildlife Crime" since inception" (what does "as a partner mean"?)
438:
406:
342:
archaeological site in 1984 and has largely been ignored by the corporate world of academia since then. Considering my interest simply involves saving the
280:
the article claims that
Marriage lobbies for the “Quality Driving Initiative”. But although the website claims lots of involvement, the term gets
237:
421:
305:
256:
36:
379:
197:
17:
347:
endeavour to get as much of these records of the origins of our culture documented before their imminent destruction by
44:
77:
417:
301:
281:
252:
159:. This is new enough and long enough to meet the criteria, but the article has many serious problems, including:
378:
Oh my. Brownhaired Girl is correct. This person does not strike me as notable either, and AfD is the next step.
383:
187:
192:
I see no plausible assertion of notability. The only claim to notability is that the subject is head of the
186:... and Bedson has clearly at least met Edmund Marriage, becuase he claims authorship of the portrait photo
40:
362:
270:
193:
173:
138:
184:
410:
392:
335:
294:
285:
274:
245:
94:
106:
181:
286:
general Google search for term throws up only 10 hits. 2 of those are on
Knowledge, two of them
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
215:
356:
169:
134:
290:
176:, and both articles use the same sources. Bedson's name appears twice on the website of
343:
339:
99:
432:
205:
201:
165:
327:
155:
331:
177:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
351:
61:
102:
348:
110:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
269:
The article is an orphan, linked to only from one mainspace page:
266:
The more I look at this, the less I like it. For example:
242:
Try to avoid hooks that take the form of "... that X is Y?
293:, with almost identical text to the Knowledge article. --
82:
291:
http://justenergyradio.com/archive-pages/emarriage.htm
200:
236:
Even if those serious problems can be resolved, the
407:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Edmund Marriage
240:do not appear to be met. They specifically say
233:he head of a Foundation, or is he independent?)
172:) has also created the article on the linked
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
141:). Self nom at 20:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
178:The Patrick Foundation Golden Age Project
439:Failed DYK nominations from August 2012
221:"He lobbies on a range of key issues"
7:
168:here? The creator of this article (
405:The article is being discussed at
105:who has campaigned on issues from
24:
244:-- yet this hook is just that. --
18:Template:Did you know nominations
399:
154:
214:There are several instances of
32:Please do not modify this page.
334:in 2009, which Edmund's uncle
273:, which in turn links only to
211:Para 2 is completely unsourced
64:14:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
426:14:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
386:) 01:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
369:00:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
310:21:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
261:20:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
455:
198:article by Duff Hart-Davis
188:File:Edmund marriage.jpg
41:the article's talk page
133:Created/expanded by
125:Symphony (video game)
107:wildlife management
338:suggested was the
271:Patrick Foundation
194:Patrick Foundation
174:Patrick Foundation
425:
336:Christian O'Brien
309:
260:
142:
446:
416:
413:
403:
402:
368:
365:
359:
300:
297:
251:
248:
170:user:Paul Bedson
158:
132:
56:The result was:
34:
454:
453:
449:
448:
447:
445:
444:
443:
429:
428:
427:
411:
404:
400:
397:
393:Edmund Marriage
363:
357:
355:
295:
275:Edmund Marriage
246:
95:Edmund Marriage
89:
87:
83:Article history
71:
69:Edmund Marriage
65:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
452:
450:
442:
441:
431:
430:
398:
396:
391:Nomination of
389:
388:
387:
380:66.168.247.159
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
344:Garden of Eden
340:Garden of Eden
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
278:
263:
262:
234:
230:
229:
228:
225:
222:
212:
209:
190:
151:
150:
149:
148:
130:
129:
128:
127:
115:
114:
86:
85:
80:
78:Back to T:TDYK
74:
72:
70:
67:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
451:
440:
437:
436:
434:
423:
419:
415:
408:
394:
390:
385:
381:
377:
376:
366:
360:
353:
350:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
307:
303:
299:
292:
287:
283:
282:no Gnews hits
279:
276:
272:
268:
267:
265:
264:
258:
254:
250:
243:
239:
235:
231:
226:
223:
220:
219:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
153:
152:
147:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
126:
122:
119:
118:
117:
116:
112:
108:
104:
101:
97:
96:
91:
90:
84:
81:
79:
76:
75:
68:
66:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
395:for deletion
328:Jordan river
241:
238:hook citeria
131:
120:
93:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
358:Paul Bedson
332:Aaiha plain
164:Is there a
135:Paul Bedson
414:HairedGirl
352:bulldozers
298:HairedGirl
249:HairedGirl
216:WP:PEACOCK
92:... that
433:Category
422:contribs
349:Lebanese
306:contribs
284:, and a
257:contribs
121:Reviewed
103:lobbyist
58:rejected
330:in the
218:prose:
113:safety?
111:driving
100:British
418:(talk)
302:(talk)
253:(talk)
206:WP:BIO
202:WP:GNG
166:WP:COI
412:Brown
296:Brown
247:Brown
98:is a
62:Panyd
16:<
409:. --
384:talk
364:talk
204:and
139:talk
420:• (
304:• (
255:• (
109:to
60:by
43:or
435::
354:.
183:,
180::
123::
73:(
39:,
424:)
382:(
367:❉
361:❉
308:)
277:.
259:)
208:.
137:(
88:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
