Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/Elevational Diversity Gradient

Source 📝

142: 163: 145:
Article is big and new enough. However there are sections with no references. The introduction, first paragraph in Origin and Area Hypothesis have no references. Normally the introduction would need no reference as the content would be covered elsewhere in the article with a citation. In this case
146:
the hook is included but not expanded on elsewhere, so I will have to count hook as uncited. Also the hook is quite boring being just a definition. An alternative is the idea about the Flood concentrating species higher up is much more interesting.
192: 36: 40: 17: 98: 44: 81: 151: 128: 112: 120: 171: 65: 124: 108: 147: 116: 102:
is an ecological pattern describing differences in biodiversity across an elevational gradient?
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
167: 61: 186: 141: 162: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 86: 8: 49:No further edits should be made to this page 193:Failed DYK nominations from November 2012 7: 166:Issues still present. —  131:) at 20:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 24: 18:Template:Did you know nominations 161: 140: 174:) 23:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC) 154:) 20:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC) 68:) 16:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify this page. 99:Elevational Diversity Gradient 73:Elevational Diversity Gradient 1: 45:Knowledge talk:Did you know 37:this nomination's talk page 209: 41:the article's talk page 107:Created/expanded by 132: 123:). Nominated by 200: 165: 144: 106: 60:by  —  56:The result was: 34: 208: 207: 203: 202: 201: 199: 198: 197: 183: 182: 181: 148:Graeme Bartlett 93: 91: 87:Article history 75: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 206: 204: 196: 195: 185: 184: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 156: 155: 138: 104: 103: 90: 89: 84: 82:Back to T:TDYK 78: 76: 74: 71: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 205: 194: 191: 190: 188: 173: 169: 164: 160: 159: 158: 157: 153: 149: 143: 139: 137: 136: 135: 134: 133: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 101: 100: 95: 94: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 72: 70: 67: 63: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 125:Mike.stansel 109:Mike.stansel 105: 97: 96:... that an 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 168:Crisco 1492 62:Crisco 1492 117:Ratkins92 187:Category 58:rejected 16:< 172:talk 152:talk 129:talk 121:talk 113:talk 66:talk 115:), 43:or 189:: 77:( 39:, 170:( 150:( 127:( 119:( 111:( 92:) 64:( 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge talk:Did you know
Crisco 1492
talk
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Elevational Diversity Gradient
Mike.stansel
talk
Ratkins92
talk
Mike.stansel
talk

Graeme Bartlett
talk

Crisco 1492
talk
Category
Failed DYK nominations from November 2012

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.