98:
524:
540:
368:
Doesn't sound like you've taken the feedback onboard. Running a shadow DYK without letting primary contributor(s) know is exceptionally bad form. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that this wasn't intentional - if it was, then you'll have a lot more to answer for. Adding yourself as an author
332:
I am not claiming authorship "based on intent". If I don't get around to expanding the article, I will remove myself from the credits. I have simply requested that the article be bypassed for review until I have had time to add my contribution. That hardly appears to me to be an unreasonable request,
415:
Now it's my turn to run out of patience. Quite frankly I can't recall anybody ever kicking up such a fuss over the fact that somebody nominated his article at DYK and failed to immediately inform him of the fact. But I certainly have no desire to continue bickering with someone over something as
238:
436:
Clearly you've missed the point, and I too have lost patience waiting for the elusive content addition that never came. Anyway, thanks for striking the note and good luck with the T.J Southall article you've spun off this one.
372:
Lastly, you don't have any "skin" in the game (yet), so very simply, you don't have a mandate right now to put the brakes on the review of this article; please could you strike your note from the top of this text. Thanks
424:
article, so I will be moving on to greener pastures. I just hope someone will still have enough interest in this nomination to at least give it the copyedit it so desperately needs before being displayed on the mainpage.
226:
Well, you may be done with it, but I'm not :) There is quite a bit of info I intend to add to this before it goes to the mainpage, so again, please refrain from reviewing it for the time being.
297:
Socrates2008 is the only author at the time of nomination. And as of this posting, Gatoclass has contributed nothing to editing of the article. You can't claim authorship based on
369:
above without having made a single edit to the article was hopefully an oversight too, as the alternative would be exceptionally selfish and disrespectful towards your WP peers.
567:
420:
Wikipedians would view as a positive. Certainly, you've done more than enough at this point to discourage me from adding any additional content to
36:
241:
to the article, yet have submitted the article for DYK with yourself as a co-creator, and without having the courtesy to inform me?
17:
97:
44:
81:
333:
given that there are over 100 unreviewed articles on this page, some of which have sat here for two months.
443:
379:
298:
247:
214:
138:
532:
65:
548:
492:
430:
338:
275:
231:
200:
192:
146:
40:
416:
innocuous as a proposal to add some additional content to a new article - a proposal that I think
543:
Article is new enough and long enough and the hook is referenced. Image is in the public domain.
185:
This article is not quite ready for review yet. I will strike this post when the article is ready
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
306:
134:
528:
125:
106:
61:
544:
488:
426:
334:
271:
227:
196:
188:
142:
111:
523:
561:
302:
539:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
117:
195:) 05:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC) * Struck as a result of discussion below.
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
208:
I'm done expanding the article, so please go ahead with the review.
124:
led to a change in U.S. law permitting the awarding of
86:
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
237:Perhaps you could elaborate - you haven't
169:The following discussion has been closed.
164:Discussion not relevant to article review
160:
568:Passed DYK nominations from October 2012
7:
24:
149:) at 03:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
18:Template:Did you know nominations
538:
522:
96:
535:) 17:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
433:) 10:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
234:) 10:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
551:) 13:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
495:) 12:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
341:) 18:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
309:) 11:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
278:) 15:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
203:) 10:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
68:) 04:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
1:
448:11:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
384:06:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
252:12:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
219:10:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
270:Replied on your talk page.
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
584:
105:... that the loss of the
172:Please do not modify it.
41:the article's talk page
133:Created/expanded by
122:(wreckage pictured)
519:
518:
150:
141:). Nominated by
128:to non-Americans?
126:Lifesaving Medals
575:
542:
526:
487:Thanks - ditto.
447:
383:
251:
218:
174:
161:
132:
107:full-rigged ship
100:
56:The result was:
34:
583:
582:
578:
577:
576:
574:
573:
572:
558:
557:
556:
527:Review needed.
438:
374:
260:
242:
209:
170:
102:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
581:
579:
571:
570:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
552:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
370:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
221:
220:
205:
204:
176:
175:
166:
165:
159:
158:
157:
156:
130:
129:
112:Ellen Southard
94:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
73:Ellen Southard
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
580:
569:
566:
565:
563:
550:
546:
541:
537:
536:
534:
530:
525:
521:
520:
494:
490:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
445:
441:
435:
434:
432:
428:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
381:
377:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
340:
336:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
277:
273:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
249:
245:
240:
236:
235:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
216:
212:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
183:
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
168:
167:
163:
162:
155:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
144:
140:
136:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
113:
108:
104:
103:
101:
99:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
440:Socrates2008
439:
421:
417:
376:Socrates2008
375:
259:
244:Socrates2008
243:
211:Socrates2008
210:
184:
181:
171:
135:Socrates2008
131:
121:
110:
109:
95:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
529:BlueMoonset
239:contributed
62:BlueMoonset
545:Cwmhiraeth
489:Gatoclass
427:Gatoclass
335:Gatoclass
272:Gatoclass
228:Gatoclass
197:Gatoclass
189:Gatoclass
143:Gatoclass
118:Liverpool
562:Category
303:— Maile
120:in 1875
58:promoted
299:intent
182:NOTE:
16:<
549:talk
533:talk
493:talk
444:Talk
431:talk
422:this
418:most
380:Talk
339:talk
307:talk
276:talk
248:Talk
232:talk
215:Talk
201:talk
193:talk
147:talk
139:talk
116:off
66:talk
60:by
43:or
564::
301:.
187:.
77:(
39:,
547:(
531:(
491:(
446:)
442:(
429:(
382:)
378:(
337:(
305:(
274:(
250:)
246:(
230:(
217:)
213:(
199:(
191:(
145:(
137:(
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
